Mechanical lithotripsy is commonly used for large common bile duct (CBD) stones; however, fragmentation can be difficult, especially in cases of hard or large stones 1 2 3 . We evaluated the utility of a novel crusher catheter, Stone Smash (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA), which is equipped with a distal impact tip that doubles as a basket guide ( Fig. 1 ). This device was jointly developed by our institution and Lake R&D Co., Ltd. (Okaya, Nagano, Japan). Conventional basket catheters apply circumferential compression to the entire stone, leading to a crushing pattern in which the stone is flattened and fractured 4 . In contrast, the impact tip on Stone Smash enables direct, longitudinal force application at a single point, causing the stone to split along its vertical axis. Additionally, to improve ductal insertion, the sheath is short and flexible, with a preshaped bendable tip that allows easy advancement even without a guidewire. We conducted a bench test comparing Stone Smash and a standard crusher catheter without an impact tip. Five calcium sulfate blocks of similar size were used for each device, and the average crushing force required for fragmentation was measured. Stone Smash required a mean force of 5.6 kgf, significantly less than the 8.2 kgf needed with the conventional catheter ( p < 0.05). We performed lithotripsy using the Stone Smash in a 78-year-old man with CBD stones measuring 22 and 14 mm. The procedure was completed successfully without any complications ( Video 1 ). This novel catheter demonstrated superior crushing force compared to standard devices and provided excellent maneuverability due to its flexible sheath and short-type guidewire compatibility. These features enabled smooth bile duct insertion, even in tortuous anatomy or in the absence of a guidewire. Stone Smash appears to be a valuable tool in the endoscopic management of difficult CBD stones.
Fig. 1.
a Basket with high expansion force prevents stone escape. b Claw-equipped metallic tip allows effective and concentrated lithotripsy.
Demonstration of the Stone Smash catheter used for endoscopic lithotripsy of a common bile duct stone. The catheter is inserted into the bile duct over a guidewire or directly without it. After capturing the stone within the basket, the gradual closure of the claw-equipped metallic tip enables effective fragmentation.
Video 1
Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AR_2AH
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Endoscopy E-Videos https://eref.thieme.de/e-videos .
E-Videos is an open access online section of the journal Endoscopy , reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high-quality video and are published with a Creative Commons CC-BY license. Endoscopy E-Videos qualify for HINARI discounts and waivers and eligibility is automatically checked during the submission process. We grant 100% waivers to articles whose corresponding authors are based in Group A countries and 50% waivers to those who are based in Group B countries as classified by Research4Life (see: https://www.research4life.org/access/eligibility/ ). This section has its own submission website at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos .
References
- 1.Yasuda I, Itoi T. Recent advances in endoscopic management of difficult bile duct stones. Dig Endosc. 2013;25:376–385. doi: 10.1111/den.12118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chang WH, Chu CH, Wang TE et al. Outcome of simple use of mechanical lithotripsy of difficult common bile duct stones. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11:593–596. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i4.593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Syed IA, Hanif MF, Malik AK et al. Cholangioscope-Guided Electrohydraulic Lithotripsy as a Rescue Technique for an Impacted Dormia Basket With Large Common Bile Duct Stone. ACG Case Rep J. 2023;10:e00981. doi: 10.14309/crj.0000000000000981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Angsuwatcharakon P, Rerknimitr R. Cracking Difficult Biliary Stones. Clin Endosc. 2021;54:660–668. doi: 10.5946/ce.2020.256-IDEN. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

