Abstract
Background
Cinnamomum longepaniculatum(Gamble) N. Chao ex H. W. Li (C. longepaniculatum), a species renowned for its leaves and twigs yielding essential oils, is extensively utilized as a vital raw material in traditional Chinese medicine, spice, and daily chemical products, and thus possesses both high economic value and significant scientific research value. However, to date, no detailed information on the mitochondrial genome (mitogenome) has been reported.
Results
The mitogenome of C. longepaniculatum was characterized by a linear structure, spanning 870,686 bp with 46.94% GC content. It encompassed 44 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 28 tRNAs, and 3 rRNAs. Numerous repetitive sequences were observed, including 317 simple sequence repeats (SSRs), 52 tandem repeats and 874 pairs of dispersed repeats. Phylogenetic analysis based on the 41 conserved mitochondrial PCGs of C. longepaniculatum reflected its close evolutionary affinity to C. camphora, followed by C. chekiangense and C. insularimontanum. Furthermore, dot-plot analysis revealed diverse homologous collinear regions between C. longepaniculatum and other species belonging to the Laurales. Specifically, the largest collinear blocks, spanning over 861 kb, accounted for 95.59% of the total proportion between C. longepaniculatum and Cinnamomum camphora, indicating a high degree of conservation and similarity in their mitogenome structures.
Conclusions
This study presents the initial assembly and annotation of C. longepaniculatum mitogenome, thereby enriching the limited repository of mitogenome sequences available for Laurales plants. These findings provide crucial molecular evidence for further studies on the evolutionary relationships and genomic evolution within the Laurales.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12870-025-06839-6.
Keywords: Mitochondrial genome, Cinnamomum longepaniculatum, Repeat sequence, Phylogenetic analysis, Linear structure
Background
The family Lauraceae, a significant group within the order Laurales of the Magnoliidae, encompasses approximately 60 genera and 3500 species, accounting for one-third of the Magnoliid plants [1]. Despite its long history in taxonomic research, traditional classification methods based on morphological characteristics have exhibited limitations and uncertainties in both species definition and resolution of phylogenetic relationships [2]. DNA sequence analysis of the semi-autonomous organelles, chloroplasts and mitochondria, which possess their own genomes, has emerged as an indispensable tool in plant taxonomy, augmenting classification precision and advancing phylogenetic research. Compared to the conserved plastid genome, the plant mitochondrial genome (mitogenome) exhibits a relatively low mutation rate but a high frequency of genomic structural rearrangements, making it an important genetic system for studying the evolution of genome structure and functional content [3, 4].
Mitochondria are the central hub of cellular energy metabolism, underpinning the vitality and proliferation of life forms across the eukaryotic domain [5]. Mitochondria originated from α-Proteobacteria that were engulfed by early eukaryotic cells, leading to a symbiotic relationship where the engulfed bacteria provided energy production capabilities, and in return, received protection from the host cell's environment [6, 7]. Mitogenome in most organisms is inherited exclusively from the mother, a pattern known as maternal inheritance [8]. This mode of inheritance simplifies genetic studies by providing a clear lineage of transmission, which is why mitogenome is often utilized in phylogenetic and evolutionary research [9]. Plant mitogenome, compared to plant chloroplast genome and animal mitochondrial genome, varies tremendously in size among different species, spanning a 170-fold range from ~ 66 Kb in Viscum scurruloideum to 11,300 Kb in Silene conica (Caryophyllaceae) [10–13]. Plant mitogenome exhibit a high degree of plasticity, with genome architecture subject to frequent changes such as gene loss, transfer of genetic material to the nucleus, and various structural mutations and rearrangements [14, 15].
The morphology and organization of mitochondria are much more diverse and dynamic than previously thought. Their structure can range from circular to linear or even branched forms, enriched with repetitive sequences and introns, and they can also be organized into single or multipartite chromosomes [16–20]. The intricate nature of plant mitogenomes often arises from intracellular gene transfer (IGT) and mitogenome recombination events, which are facilitated by extensive repeat sequences. These transfers commonly take place between the chloroplast genome and mitogenome, as well as between the mitochondrial and nuclear genomes. The cumulative effect of such IGT contributes to the enhanced complexity observed in plant mitogenome. Extensive studies on the sequence and structure of plant mitogenome can reveal the primary mechanism, underlying the replication of plant mitogenome, offering genetic diversity, species evolutionary histories, and adaptive mechanisms.
Cinnamomum longepaniculatum (Gamble) N. Chao ex H. W. Li (C. longepaniculatum), a unique and valuable natural spice tree species belonging to the family Lauraceae, is primarily found in the Yibin region of Sichuan Province, China [21, 22]. C. longepaniculatum possesses an exceptionally strong aroma and contains rich concentration of natural essential oils extracted from its leaves and twigs, which exhibit significant applications in the spices, pharmaceuticals, and perfume production [23]. Furthermore, C. longepaniculatum plays a pivotal role in ecology, with its robust environmental adaptability and ecological service functions, such as soil improvement and air purification, contributing immeasurably to maintaining regional ecological balance [24]. Consequently, the significance of C. longepaniculatum extends beyond its potential economic value, encompassing its crucial role in preserving biodiversity and supporting ecosystem functions.
The emergence of high-throughput sequencing technology has greatly advanced the study of mitogenome, enabling the characteristics of mitogenome in non-model, understudied eukaryotes to be revealed. It has also facilitated the sequencing of large, fragmented, or repetitive-rich mitochondrial genomes, which were difficult to achieve with traditional cloning, standard/long polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and sequencing methods [25, 26].
Although the mitogenome of several species have been reported [27–29], the mitochondrial genomes of family Lauraceae are still poorly studied, severely impeding the in-depth understanding of mitochondrial level biological characteristics. In this study, the assembly of the mitochondrial genome of C. longepaniculatum was conducted, and comparative genomics analysis was performed to examine their structural stability and sequence variations. The insights obtained are pivotal for understanding the evolutionary pathway and biochemical attributes of Laurales plants.
Materials and methods
Plant materials, DNA extraction, sequencing of mitochondrial genome
The leaves of C. longepaniculatum for mitogenome determination were collected from the germplasm resource nursery with elite mother trees of Hongyan Mountain, Yibin, Sichuan Province (28°44′N, 104°48′E), China. In April 2024, six randomly selected healthy C. longepaniculatum mother trees aged 20 years were chosen. From each tree, a total of 12 mature leaves were collected in four different directions (east, west, north, and south), with three leaves obtained from the upper, middle, and lower parts of the crown. After being collected, these leaves were thoroughly mixed together, rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen, and subsequently stored in an ultra-low temperature refrigerator at −80 °C for total DNA analysis.
Both the Illumina Novaseq6000 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) and Nanopore PromethION sequencing platform (Nanopore, Oxford, UK) were utilized for the DNA sequencing of C. longepaniculatum. The genomic DNA for Illumina was extracted using the plant genomic DNA kit (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China), while the samples for PromethION were extracted using the CTAB procedure. The quality and concentration of DNA were assessed through 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, One drop spectrophotometer, and Tanon-1600 Fluorometer.
The high-quality clean reads, totaling 60.83 Mb, were obtained by applying the fastp software [30] to filter the raw Illumina sequencing data. For PromethION sequencing, a total of 4.95 Mb high-quality clean reads were obtained after filtering by filtlong (v0.2.1, https://github.com/rrwick/Filtlong) software.
Assembly and annotation of C. longepaniculatum
The PromethION data were aligned to the reference gene sequence of plant mitochondrial core genes (https://github.com/xul962464/plant_mt_ref_gene) using the minimap2 (v2.1) [31]to obtain the mitogenome sequence. Core genes are highly conserved genes in the mitochondrial genome of most eukaryotes and are usually involved in the core functions of mitochondria (such as oxidative phosphorylation, energy metabolism). These genes are highly homologous between species and are the focus of mitochondrial genome research. Variable genes refer to genes that are present exclusively in specific taxa. These genes exhibit functional diversity and are generally less conserved, potentially reflecting the adaptive evolution of species [32, 33].
Subsequently, the assembly software canu (v2.2) [34] was employed for correcting the obtained PromethION data, while bowtie2 (v2.3.5.1) [35] was utilized for aligning the Illumina data with the corrected sequence. Following this step, Unicycler (v0.4.8) [36], employing default parameters, was used to assemble both the aligned Illumina and corrected PromethION datasets together. Bandage (v0.8.1) software [37] facilitated visualization of assembly results and allowed for manual adjustments.
Mitochondrial genes of C. longepaniculatum were annotated by GeSeq [38] software using Cinnamomum camphora (C. camphora) (NC_086632.1), Cinnamomum chekiangense (C. chekiangense) (NC_082065.1) and Caryodaphnopsis henryi(NC_088584.1) as reference sequences. Default settings of tRNAscan-SE [39] were used to accurately annotated tRNAs. All obtained results underwent thorough review and manual correction prior to final annotation. Visualization of the C. longepaniculatum mitogenome was carried out using the Organellar Genome Draw (OGDRAW) (v1.3.1) software [40].
Codon usage analysis
Due to codon concatenation, each amino acid corresponds to a minimum of one codon and a maximum of six codons. There exists considerable variation in the rate of codon usage across the genomes of different species and organisms. This disparity in synonymous codon usage is referred to as Relative Synonymous Codon Usage (RSCU). The numerical value is the ratio of the actual frequency of codon usage to the theoretical frequency of codon usage. A script written in Perl was used to filter Uniq CDS (http://cloud.genepioneer.com:9929/#/tool/alltool/detail/214) (choosing one of multiple copies of CDS) and do the calculations.
Repeat sequence analysis
Repeat sequences, encompassing simple sequence repeats (SSRs), tandem repeats, and dispersed repeats were identified. The SSRs were identified utilizing MISA software (v1.0) [41]. Tandem repeats were recognized through the application of TRF software (v4.09), which was executed with a defined set of parameters [42]. Dispersed repeats were discovered by employing BLASTN software (v2.10.1), operating with a specified range of parameters that included the removal of redundancy and crosstalk duplicates. Subsequently, the visualization of these identified repeat sequences was facilitated by Circos (v0.69–5) software [43].
Homologous sequence analysis
Homologous sequences between chloroplast genome and mitogenome were identified using BLAST software [44]. The E-value was set to 1e-5, while other parameters were kept at their default settings.
Phylogenetic analysis
Sequences from different species were compared with multiple sequences using MAFFT software (v7) [45]. The aligned sequences were subsequently concatenated, trimmed with TrimAl (v1.4) using the parameter -gt 0.7, and model selection was performed via jModelTest (v2.1.10) [46] to confirm that the appropriate model was of GTR type. Following this, a Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree was constructed utilizing RAxML software (v8.2.10) [47], employing the GTRGAMMA model and conducting 1000 bootstrap replicates to assess the stability of the resulting tree.
RNA editing site prediction of C. longepaniculatum
RNA editing site predictions were performed using PmtREP tools available at (http://cloud.genepioneer.com:9929/#/tool/alltool/detail/336) [48]. Based on multiple sequence alignments, the amino acid sequence of the target sequence was compared with multiple sequences in the database. Variations occurring at corresponding positions of the target sequence across the database are then tallied. If the conditions for RNA editing are met, the site is considered a potential RNA editing site.
Collinearity analysis
The assembled C. longepaniculatum mitogenome sequences were compared with those of six closely related species using nucmer software (v4.0.0) [49] for genomic comparisons. Dot-plot plots were generated by utilizing the –maxmatch parameter.
Results
Genome features of the mitogenome of C. longepaniculatum
The mitogenome of C. longepaniculatum was successfully assembled in a computationally efficient manner, employing a unique linear model to encapsulate the entire mitogenome sequence based on long-reads data obtained from PromethION sequencing. The total length of the mitogenome was 870,686 bp, with a GC content of 46.94% (Fig. 1A). This mitogenome size is shorter than that of C. camphora, Caryodaphnopsis henryi, and Chimonanthus praecox, yet longer than observed in four other species within the Laurales (Fig. 1B).
Fig. 1.
Mitogenome map of C. longepaniculatum and PCGs composition of Laurales mitogenomes. A Mitogenome map of C. longepaniculatum. B The composition of PCGs in the mitogenomes of eight Laurales species. White square represents absent genes and varying shades of red blocks reflects different gene copy numbers
A total of 75 genes were annotated in the C. longepaniculatum mitogenome, comprising 44 protein-coding genes (PCGs), which included 26 core mitochondrial genes and 18 non-core genes (Table S1) [50]. Based on their functional characteristics, the PCGs were categorized into ten categories: ATP synthase genes (6), Cytochrome C biogenesis (4), Ubichinol cytochrome C reductase (1), Cytochrome C oxidase (3), Maturases (1), Transport membrance protein (1), NADH dehydrogenase (10), Ribosomal proteins (LSU) (4), Ribosomal proteins (SSU) (11), Succinate dehydrogenase (3) (Table 1). Additionally, 28 tRNA and 3 rRNA (rrn18, rrn26, rrn5) genes were also annotated in C. longepaniculatum mitogenome, with 6 tRNAs identified as multicopy (Table 1). Notably, within the mitogenome of C. longepaniculatum, a total of 13 genes were found to contain introns. Specifically, the genes ccmFc, cox2, rpl2, rps1, rps2, rps3, rps10 and trnT-TGT each contained one intron. The gene nad4 contained three introns, while nad1, nad2, nad5 and nad7 each possessed four introns (Table 1).
Table 1.
Gene organization in the mitogenome of C. longepaniculatum
| Group of genes# | Gene names | |
|---|---|---|
| PCGs-Core genes | ATP synthase | atp1, atp4(2), atp6, atp8, atp9 |
| Cytohrome c biogenesis | ccmB, ccmC, ccmFc*, ccmFn | |
| Ubichinol cytochrome c reductase | cob | |
| Cytochrome c oxidase | cox1, cox2*, cox3 | |
| Maturases | matR | |
| Transport membrance protein | mttB | |
| NADH dehydrogenase | nad1****, nad2****, nad3, nad4***, nad4L(2), nad5****, nad6, nad7**** nad9 | |
| PCGs-Variable genes | Ribosomal proteins (LSU) | rpl10, rpl16, rpl2*, rpl5 |
| Ribosomal proteins (SSU) | rps1*, rps10*, rps11, rps12, rps13, rps14, rps19, rps2*, rps3*, rps4, rps7 | |
| Succinate dehydrogenase | sdh3(2), sdh4 | |
| rRNAs | Ribosomal RNAs | rrn18, rrn26, rrn5 |
| tRNAs | Transfer RNAs | trnC-GCA, trnD-GTC(2), trnE-TTC(2), trnF-GAA, trnG-GCC, trnH-GTG, trnK-CTT, trnK-TTT, trnL-CAA(2), trnM-CAT(3), trnN-GTT, trnP-TGG(3), trnQ-TTG, trnR-GCG, trnS-GCT, trnS-TGA, trnT-GGT, trnT-TGT*, trnW-CCA, trnY-GTA(2) |
| other |
Note: *, ***, **** represent the total count of introns; # indicates the Pseudo gene; (2) (3) represent the copy number of multi-copy genes
The schematic comprised nine contigs, with its name, sequence length, and sequencing depth as provided in Fig. 2A. The nine contigs formed a complex and branched structure, representing the complete mitogenome of C. longepaniculatum. Contig 7 and contig 9 were two sequences of key nodes. The resulting genome sequence followed the path 6-9_copy-1–7-3–5-2–9-4-7_copy-8 (Fig. 2B). It is important to note that this method was not the exclusive form due to the dynamic nature of plant mitogenome structures. However, it was chosen to facilitate subsequent analysis.
Fig. 2.
A Schematic of C. longepaniculatum mitogenome based on Flye assembly. B Unicycler hybrid assembly-based mitogenome of C. longepaniculatum (node ID labeled in the figure). The mitogenome schematic was generated using Bandage software based on PromethION data. Each contig represented a sequence obtained from the assembly process. Contigs connected by a black line indicated an overlapping region between them
Codon usage preference of PCGs
The cumulative length of PCGs in C. longepaniculatum amounted to 35,367 bp, accounting for 4.06% of the whole mitogenome (Table S2a). In the C. longepaniculatum mitogenome, a total of 11,378 codons were utilized to encode 44 PCGs. All annotated PCGs initiated with the ATG codon and exhibited three types of termination codons (TAA, TGA, and TAG), with frequencies of utilization at 45.45%, 34.09%, and 20.45%, respectively (Table 2). The three most frequently employed amino acids were Ser (9.78%), Leu (9.44%), and Ile (7.49%), whereas Ter was the least frequent, occurring only 41 times (0.36%) (Table 2). Further analysis revealed 31 codons were found to be more prevalent (RSCU > 1), while 30 codons were less frequently employed (RSCU < 1). Notably, the codons for Met (AUG), Ser (AGU) and Trp (UGG) exhibited RSCU values of 1, indicating their standard levels of utilization. Among these high-frequency codons (RSCU > 1), 28 ended in either A or U, accounting for a significant proportion of 90.3%. This indicated a strong inclination towards codons ending in NNA or NNU in the mitogenome of C. longepaniculatum (Table 2).
Table 2.
Codon counts and RSCU in C. longepaniculatum mitochondrial PCGs
| Amino Acid | Symbol | Codon | Count | RSCU | Amino Acid | Symbol | Codon | Count | RSCU |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| * | Ter | UAA | 19 | 1.39 | M | Met | AUG | 311 | 1.00 |
| * | Ter | UGA | 13 | 0.95 | N | Asn | AAU | 248 | 1.36 |
| * | Ter | UAG | 9 | 0.66 | N | Asn | AAC | 117 | 0.64 |
| A | Ala | GCU | 288 | 1.58 | P | Pro | CCU | 240 | 1.35 |
| A | Ala | GCA | 184 | 1.01 | P | Pro | CCA | 202 | 1.14 |
| A | Ala | GCC | 158 | 0.87 | P | Pro | CCC | 148 | 0.83 |
| A | Ala | GCG | 98 | 0.54 | P | Pro | CCG | 121 | 0.68 |
| C | Cys | UGU | 93 | 1.16 | Q | Gln | CAA | 240 | 1.49 |
| C | Cys | UGC | 68 | 0.84 | Q | Gln | CAG | 82 | 0.51 |
| D | Asp | GAU | 261 | 1.41 | R | Arg | AGA | 184 | 1.33 |
| D | Asp | GAC | 110 | 0.59 | R | Arg | CGA | 180 | 1.30 |
| E | Glu | GAA | 316 | 1.32 | R | Arg | CGU | 170 | 1.22 |
| E | Glu | GAG | 162 | 0.68 | R | Arg | CGG | 108 | 0.78 |
| F | Phe | UUU | 345 | 1.06 | R | Arg | AGG | 102 | 0.73 |
| F | Phe | UUC | 307 | 0.94 | R | Arg | CGC | 89 | 0.64 |
| G | Gly | GGA | 294 | 1.44 | S | Ser | UCU | 242 | 1.30 |
| G | Gly | GGU | 256 | 1.26 | S | Ser | UCA | 214 | 1.15 |
| G | Gly | GGG | 152 | 0.75 | S | Ser | UCC | 188 | 1.01 |
| G | Gly | GGC | 112 | 0.55 | S | Ser | AGU | 186 | 1.00 |
| H | His | CAU | 229 | 1.54 | S | Ser | UCG | 171 | 0.92 |
| H | His | CAC | 68 | 0.46 | S | Ser | AGC | 112 | 0.60 |
| I | Ile | AUU | 365 | 1.29 | T | Thr | ACU | 198 | 1.36 |
| I | Ile | AUC | 256 | 0.90 | T | Thr | ACC | 153 | 1.05 |
| I | Ile | AUA | 231 | 0.81 | T | Thr | ACA | 147 | 1.01 |
| K | Lys | AAA | 295 | 1.19 | T | Thr | ACG | 86 | 0.59 |
| K | Lys | AAG | 202 | 0.81 | V | Val | GUA | 211 | 1.20 |
| L | Leu | UUA | 237 | 1.32 | V | Val | GUU | 194 | 1.10 |
| L | Leu | CUU | 231 | 1.29 | V | Val | GUG | 172 | 0.98 |
| L | Leu | UUG | 223 | 1.25 | V | Val | GUC | 128 | 0.73 |
| L | Leu | CUA | 155 | 0.87 | W | Trp | UGG | 153 | 1.00 |
| L | Leu | CUC | 123 | 0.69 | Y | Tyr | UAU | 236 | 1.49 |
| L | Leu | CUG | 105 | 0.59 | Y | Tyr | UAC | 80 | 0.51 |
Note: The asterisk (*) denotes a stop codon
In the eight complete mitogenome sequences of Laurales plants, a total of 64 different types of codons encoding all 20 amino acids were also identified. The three most frequently utilized amino acids were also Ser, Leu, and Ile, with total count of more than 1066, 1090 and 795, respectively (Table S2b). Among the mitochondrial PCGs of C. longepaniculatum, alanine (Ala) exhibited a distinct preference for GCU with highest RSCU value of 1.58. Following closely was histidine (His), which favored CAU with an RSCU value of 1.54 (Table 2). Similarly, in the seven species of Laurales plants, the preferred codons for alanine and histidine were also GCU and CAU, respectively, which demonstrates a strongly conserved preference across Laurales species (Table S2b, Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.
Relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) of PCGs within eight species of Laurales. The x-axis represents codon families. The stacked bar graph for each codon from left to right is the species of C. longepaniculatum, C. camphora, C. chekiangense, C. insularimontanum, Machilus pauhoi, Caryodaphnopsis henryi, Hernandia nymphaeifolia and Chimonanthua praecox. RSCU values represents specific codon frequency in comparison to uniform synonymous codon usage expected frequency
Repeat sequences analysis
The repetitive sequence, including simple sequence, tandem, and dispersed repeats, was analyzed in the mitogenome of C. longepaniculatum (Fig. 4). A total of 317 SSRs were identified, encompassing repeat types ranging from monomeric to hexameric nucleotides in length. Notably, the monomeric and tetrameric repeats were the predominant types with 86 and 121 repeats, accounting for 27.1% and 38.2%, respectively (Table S3). This pattern of distribution aligned closely with observations in the mitogenomes of Machilus pauhoi, hernandia nymphaeifolia and Chimonanthus praecox. However, in the mitogenomes of C. camphora, C. chekiangense, C. insularimontanum and Caryodaphnopsis henryi, monomeric and dimeric repeats were more abundant, particularly in Caryodaphnopsis henryi, where monomeric repeats constituted as high as 75.8% of the SSRs (Table S3, Fig. 5A).
Fig. 4.
Distribution of repetitive sequences within mitogenome of C. longepaniculatum. The outermost circle represented the mitogenome sequence, followed inward by simple sequence repeats, tandem repeated sequences, and dispersed repeated sequences
Fig. 5.
Histogram of repetitive sequence analysis. A SSRs Types in eight Laurales species. The horizontal axis represented SSR types, while the vertical axis displayed the number of repetitive fragments. B Tandem and dispersed repeats in eight Laurales species. The horizontal axis represented the types of repeats, while the vertical axis illustrated the number of repeats
A total of 52 tandem repeat sequences were identified within the C. longepaniculatum mitogenome, with matching degrees exceeding 76% and lengths ranging from 2 to 48 bp. The copy number variation of these 52 tandem repeat sequences ranged between 1.9 and 16.2, among them, three nucleotide sequences had copy numbers exceeding 10, specifically the dinucleotide repeat sequences AT and TA, and the tetranucleotide repeat sequence AAAG (Table S4).
The REPuter software also detected dispersed repeats in the C. longepaniculatum mitogenome [51], revealing a significant number of dispersed repeats totaling 874 pairs, with lengths equal to or greater than 30 bp. Among these, there were 414 pairs of forward repeats (F) and 460 pairs of palindromic repeats (P), without any reverse or complementary repeats (Table S5). The longest palindromic repeat was found to be 958 bp in length, while the longest forward repeat spanned an impressive length of 9991 bp (Table S6). Additionally, an analysis of the mitogenomes of seven other Laurales species revealed that Machilus pauhoi exhibited a similar number of forward repeats (381) and palindromic repeats (472) as compared to C. longepaniculatum (Table S5). Particularly, our analysis of C. longepaniculatum mitogenome did not reveal any reverse or complementary repeats, a finding that was consistent with observations in mitogenomes of Machilus pauhoi, hernandia nymphaeifolia and Chimonanthus praecox (Fig. 5B).
Homologous analysis of genome sequences
The chloroplast genome of C. longepaniculatum exhibited a length of 152,730 bp, encompassing 129 genes (Table S7). Through sequence similarity analysis, a total of 35 fragments were homologous sequences to the chloroplast genome and mitogenome, with more than 75.8% similarity. The length of these fragments ranged from 32 to 4,741 bp, with six fragments exceeding 1000 bp (Table S8). These homologous sequences had a cumulative length of 15,462 bp, constituting approximately 1.78% of the overall mitogenome length (Fig. 6). By annotating these homologous sequences, a total of 10 tRNA genes (trnH-GTG, trnL-CAA, trnN-GTT, trnT-GGT, trnM-CAT, trnE-TTC, trnY-GTA, trnP-TGG, trnW-CCA, trnD-GTC) in mitogenome were completely located within these homologous sequences, while two rRNA genes (rrn18, rrn26) were partially located within them. Additionally, some chloroplasts genes were also observed on these homologous sequences, including three PCGs (rps7, ndhB and petN) and eleven tRNA (Table S9).
Fig. 6.
Homology analysis of the mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes of C. longepaniculatum. The upper arcs symbolized the mitogenome, the lower arcs denoted the chloroplast genome, and blue lines connecting the arcs indicated homologous sequences. Blocks of the same color symbolized genes from the same complex, with outer and inner circles indicating genes on the positive and negative strands, respectively
Phylogenetic analysis
Based on the DNA sequences of 41 conserved mtPCGs (atp1, atp4, atp6, atp8, atp9, ccmB, ccmC, ccmFc, ccmFn, cob, cox1, cox2, cox3, matR, mttB, nad1, nad2, nad3, nad4, nad4L, nad5, nad6, nad7, nad9, rpl10, rpl16, rpl2, rpl5, rps1, rps10, rps11, rps12, rps13, rps14, rps19, rps2, rps3, rps4, rps7, sdh3, sdh4), a phylogenetic tree was constructed for 26 species belonging to four orders of magnoliids. In the resulting phylogenetic tree analysis, 22 out of 25 branching nodes exhibited bootstrap values exceeding 99%, with 20 nodes having a bootstrap value of 100%. The topological arrangement of the phylogenetic tree aligned consistently with the latest identification by the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG) when rooted in mitogenome sequences. It was worth noting that the C. longepaniculatum was classified within the family Lauraceae of the Laurales order and demonstrated a close phylogenetic relationship with C. camphora, followed by the C. chekiangense and the C. insularimontanum species (Fig. 7).
Fig. 7.
The phylogenetic associations of C. longepaniculatum. alongside 28 other plant species. Phylogenetic tree constructed by maximum likelihood method based on 41 conserved mitochondrial genomic PCGs. Numerical values at each node represented bootstrap probability. Different colors indicated the respective orders that the specific species belong. Ginkgo biloba and Pinus taeda were used as outgroup species
Prediction of RNA editing sites
The PmtREP software was used to predict RNA editing events in 44 unique PCGs from C. longepaniculatum mitogenome. A total of 761 potential RNA editing sites were identified, characterized by consistent C to T conversions. The RNA editing sites identified involve changes in 25 codons, which mainly at the second base (n = 491, 64.52%), followed by the first base (n = 240, 31.54%), with the both changes occurring at the first and second base (n = 30, 3.94%) (Table S10). Notably, the nad4 gene exhibited the highest frequency of RNA editing sites with a total of 64 edits, while rps1, rps7, rps11 and rps14 had only 3 editing site each. The number of change sites in the remaining genes ranged from 4 to 45 (Fig. 8). In addition, there were a total of 31 codon variations implicated in RNA editing sites. Among them, 43.76% of amino acids showed no alteration in hydrophobicity. Conversely, 46.52% were predicted to transition from a hydrophilic to a hydrophobic state, while 8.94% were anticipated to shift from hydrophobic to hydrophilic (Table S11). Furthermore, it was found that RNA editing events could potentially introduce stop codons in the atp6, atp9, rps10, rps11, rpl16 and ccmFc genes (Table S10. Table S11).
Fig. 8.
Illustration of RNA editing site distribution across individual mitochondrial PCGs in C. longepaniculatum. The blue bars depict the number of RNA-editing sites for each gene
Collinearity analysis
The dot-plot analysis revealed a substantial number of variations in collinearity among the mitogenomes of C. longepaniculatum and seven related species within the Laurales order. Notably, the largest co-linear blocks, spanning 861,135 bp, were observed in comparison with C. camphora, accounting for approximately 95.59% of the total proportion, followed by C. chekiangense and C. insularimontanum with 72.98% (Table S12). These findings indicate that C. longepaniculatum shared a high degree of genetic similarity and evolutionary conservation with species within the Lauraceae family, particularly with C. camphora. Conversely, the collinearity between C. longepaniculatum and species from other families in the order Laurales is markedly lower, with only 38.92% in Hernandia nymphaeifolia (Hernandiaceae) and 26.88% in Chimonanthus praecox (Calycanthaceae) (Fig. 9). These results suggest greater divergence in mitogenome structure and evolution across these lineages.
Fig. 9.
Dot-plots analysis. The sequence of C. longepaniculatum were plotted along the horizontal axis in each box, while the sequences of the other seven species were represented along the vertical axis. The numbers in parentheses indicated the proportion of homologous sequences in relation to the total genome. The red lines in the box denoted forward alignment, whereas the blue lines represented reverse complementary alignment
Discussion
Structural characteristics of the C. longepaniculatum mitogenome
Plant mitogenome exhibits a higher level of complexity compared to those of animals, characterized by substantial variations in size, intricate sequence arrangements, abundant repetitive content, and a remarkably conserved coding sequence [13, 52, 53]. Deciphering the architecture of these mitogenomes is crucial for elucidating their functionalities, replication mechanisms, modes of inheritance, as well as their evolutionary pathways. Although the plant mitogenomes are frequently assembled and depicted in the form of circular maps, it is most probably not a single, large, circular DNA molecule. Instead, it primarily exists as an intricate and ever-changing assortment of linear DNA segments, along with a mix of smaller, circular, and branched DNA molecules [54–56]. The mitogenome of order Laurales that has been identified exhibits complex and varied structures, which included branched (C. camphora) [27], one large linear plus two small circular structures (Caryodaphnopsis henryi) [28], single circular (C. chekiangense) [29], and double circular structure (Machilus pauhoi) [57]. The mitogenome of our C. longepaniculatum displayed a linear arrangement and consisted of 9 contigs with a total genome size of 870,686 bp, which added another dimension to this structural repertoire (Fig. 1, Table 1).
Despite these structural variations, C. longepaniculatum shares core PCGs essential for oxidative phosphorylation (e.g., atp1, cox1, nad2) with other Laurales species, probably highlighting the conservation of fundamental energy-production mechanisms in mitogenomes of this family. Notably, 24 core PCGs were all identified in C. longepaniculatum mitogenome, which were inconsistent with the identification results of missing matR core genes in C. camphora, C. chekiangense and C. insularimontanum. This indicates that the core PCGs sequence in mitogenome of C. longepaniculatum are not lost during mitochondrial symbiosis. The specific function and related mechanism of this mitochondrial gene still need to be further explored and verified.
Codon usage analysis of PCGs
The eukaryotic genome comprises 64 codons, with substantial variation in the frequency of codon utilization among different species. This preference is thought to be the result of a relative equilibrium that gradually develops within the cell over a long period of evolutionary selection [58]. The PCGs in the mitogenome of C. longepaniculatum accounted for only 4.06% (35,367/870,686) of the total sequence length, similar to 3.59% observed in Caryodaphnopsis henryi [47]. This suggests a significant presence of non-coding sequences within the mitogenome, which might contain regulatory elements crucial for replication, transcription, and expression regulation of mitogenome. Alternatively, this low proportion of PCGs could suggest a more streamlined and efficient encoding strategy employed by C. longepaniculatum to prioritize the synthesis of essential mitochondrial proteins, while minimizing the metabolic cost associated with mitogenome replication and maintenance [59]. Analysis of codon usage through RSCU unveiled a notable adenine/thymine (A/U) richness (90.3%) at third codon position within C. longepaniculatum mitogenome. Similarly, the proportion in the other Laurales species ranged from 90.6% to 93.9% (Table S2). The prevalence of NNA and NNU codons underscores a pronounced bias towards a nucleotide at the third codon. This observed pattern likely results from a combination of mutational pressure and selection for efficient translation within the mitochondria [60]. Further investigation is needed to elucidate the specific functional and regulatory roles of these codon usage patterns in the mitochondrial biology of C. longepaniculatum.
The PCGs of eight Laurales plants exhibited a significant preference for the codons encoding Ser, Leu and Ile, while the usage frequency of Ter was relatively low. This phenomenon likely reflects the functional requirements of the mitogenome. Specifically, Leu and Ile participate in energy metabolism through the branched-chain amino acid metabolic pathway, and Ser supports mitochondrial function through the one-carbon metabolic pathway. These processes are crucial for maintaining the normal function of mitochondria [61]. In addition, the low-frequency usage of termination codons may be related to the small size of the mitogenome and the efficient gene expression regulation mechanism to reduce the risk of functional disorders caused by premature termination [62].
Repeat sequences
Repeated sequences are important sources of information for the development of population and evolutionary analysis markers. Tandem, SSR, and long repeats are widely present in mitochondrial genomes. The repeated sequences in plant mitogenome are critical to intermolecular recombination, which can generate structural variations and extreme mitogenome sizes [63–65]. The detection of 52 tandem repeat sequences in C. longepaniculatum, with high matching degrees (more than 76%) and varying copy numbers (from 1.9 to 16.2), indicates a dynamic region of the mitogenome that may be subject to frequent recombination events. The presence of tandem repeats with high copy numbers, such as the dinucleotide repeats AT and TA, and the tetranucleotide repeat AAAG, could have implications for genome stability and gene expression regulation (Table S4). The high A/T composition in SSRs likely contributes to the overall AT richness observed in C. longepaniculatum mitogenome. This trend aligns with broader patterns observed across land plants, suggesting a consistent evolutionary trajectory in terms of base composition within plant organelle genomes [66–68].
Interestingly, C. longepaniculatum exhibits a similar number of forward and palindromic repeats to Machilus pauhoi, further supporting the shared structural features among these closely related species. However, the significantly longer palindromic repeat (958 bp) and forward repeat (9,991 bp) identified in C. longepaniculatum highlight its unique genomic complexity. Importantly, these repetitive sequences not only facilitate the expansion of the size of mitogenome but also signify the recurrent and frequent occurrence of intermolecular recombination within mitogenome molecules [39, 69]. Further research into the functional implications of these repeat sequences could provide deeper insights into the molecular mechanisms shaping the evolution of mitochondrial genomes in plants.
Homology analysis
Angiosperms exhibit substantial exchange of genetic material among organelle genomes, facilitated by the transfer of DNA from chloroplasts to the mitochondrial DNA, a process termed MTPTs (Mitochondrial plastid DNAs) [70]. Monitoring gene migration is crucial for unraveling the evolutionary trajectory of the plant mitogenome. This phenomenon primarily accounts for the variations in the number of coding genes observed across diverse plant species [71]. Based on the data, it was found that 15,462 bp of homologous sequences between the mitogenome and chloroplast genome of C. longepaniculatum, representing approximately 1.78% of the total length of the mitogenome. Generally, genes that migrate from chloroplast genome to mitogenome frequently evolve into pseudogenes, losing their functional significance, potentially as a result of sequence recombination events [72, 73]. Previous studies have demonstrated that the two pseudogenes ψndhB and ψcemA in the Aeginetia indica mitogenome were transferred from its plastid genome [74]. These homologous segments vary interspecifically in terms of both their length and sequence composition. In this study, 10 intact tRNA genes were completely located in homologous sequences, accounting for 35.71% (10/28) of the total tRNA in the C. longepaniculatum mitogenome. The translocation of tRNA genes from chloroplast genome to mitogenome a represents a recurring pattern in plant evolutionary history. Notably, as plants evolve from simpler to more complex taxonomic groups, the incidence of such tRNA transfers intensifies, paralleling the escalating requirements for protein biosynthesis [75]. The chloroplast genome of C. longepaniculatum significantly contributes numerous sequences to the mitogenome, thereby enriching the diversity of its mitogenome. However, the underlying mechanisms that govern the migration of sequences between these genomes and the expression patterns of genes within the transferred sequences remain elusive, necessitating further exploration and research.
RNA editing sites prediction
RNA editing refers to the phenomenon of insertion, deletion, and substitution of bases in the coding region of RNA after transcription [76]. This is a common phenomenon in the transcriptome, particularly in the transcription process of plant mitochondrial genes, which can lead to great diversity of posttranscriptional gene sequences [77]. Earlier studies have reported 782 RNA editing sites in 40 PCGs of C. camphora, 1119 in 41 C. chekiangense PCGs [27, 29]. In this study, the 761 RNA editing sites were identified across 44 PCGs, with nad4 showing the highest frequency of RNA editing (64 sites) (Fig. 8). This finding is consistent with the observation of the highest editing events (68 sites and 77 sites) for the nad4 gene in C. camphora and C. chekiangense. The nad4 gene, encoding a core subunit of Complex I (NADH dehydrogenase) in the electron transport chain, plays a critical role in ATP synthesis and mitochondrial energy production [78]. RNA editing at multiple sites within nad4 may fine-tune its catalytic efficiency or regulatory interactions, ensuring adaptation to metabolic demands.
The RNA editing sites in C. longepaniculatum exclusively exhibited transitions from C to T, mainly occurring at the first (31.54%, 240 sites) and second (64.52%, 491 sites) editing position in codon (Table S10). This positional preference aligns with the observed pattern of RNA editing changes in other angiosperms, where editing at the second base often modulates amino acid hydrophobicity or maintains conserved protein domains [79, 80]. The impact of RNA editing on protein structure is highly significant, as it alters the start and stop codons of PCGs, thereby modifying the placement of the initiation and termination signals for translation [81]. For instance, cox1, nad1, nad4L and rps10 were found to possess ACG start codons that are corrected to the universal AUG start codon via RNA editing [79]. In C. camphora, an ACG-to-AUG editing event in nad4L generates the correct start codon [27]. Additionally, in Asparagus officinalis, five amino acid coding sites (0.82%) resulted in stop codons, specifically located in the atp9 and ccmFc gene (CGA-TGA), rps11 and atp6 gene (CAA-TAA), and rpl16 gene (CAG-TAG) [54]. The generation of new start and stop codons through RNA editing leads to the production of more evolutionarily conserved proteins, which exhibit high homology with corresponding proteins in other species. This conservation enhances the expression of mitochondrial genes [82].
Phylogenetic analysis and collinearity
The phylogenetic analysis of mitogenome has gained increased attention to elucidate the intricate evolutionary relationships. In this study, we used 41 conserved PCGs to reconstruct the phylogenetic trees of 26 Magnoliids species. Eight species of Laurales formed a closely related cluster and exhibit a close phylogenetic relationship with Magnoliales, as compared to Piperales and Ranunculaceles. This finding aligns with the results reported by Han et al. concerning C. camphora [27] and is consistent with the Angiosperm classification system APG IV [83]. It is worth noting that although plant mitogenome play a key role in plant evolutionary studies and provide unique evolutionary information, the total number of plant mitogenomes that have been completely sequenced is still limited, and constructing a phylogenetic tree solely based on mitogenome may not precisely mirror the accurate phylogenetic relationships. Therefore, the complete DNA information of species can be obtained by whole genome sequencing in the future, and the problem of data bias can be better solved by constructing molecular phylogenetic trees at the gene level [84, 85].
We identified homologous co-linear blocks among C. longepaniculatum and other seven species of Laurales in the comprehensive comparative analysis. The dot-plot analysis revealed distinct patterns of genomic conservation and divergence. High collinearity, such as the 95.59% similarity observed between C. longepaniculatum and C. camphora, was concentrated in dense red forward alignments along the diagonal, suggesting that these two species likely share a relatively recent common ancestor within the Lauraceae family. The low collinearity from other families may reflect differences in genomic conservation and the potential influence of evolutionary processes such as gene rearrangements, insertions, or deletions across these lineages. Such extensive rearrangements are likely drivers of evolution and contributors to the observed mitogenome diversity in this species [20, 86]. Further investigation into the specific mechanisms underlying these rearrangements can provide insights into the molecular basis of evolutionary adaptation and the generation of biodiversity in Laurales species.
Conclusions
In this study, we completed the assembly and annotation of the entire C. longepaniculatum mitogenome. The assembled mitogenome exhibited a linear structure with a length of 870,686 bp and a GC content of 46.94%. A total of 75 genes, comprising 44 PCGs, 28 tRNA genes, and 3 rRNA genes were annotated. Codon usage preference analysis revealed that among the 31 codons with RSCU > 1, there was a strong preference for ending in A/U, highlighting conserved translational optimization strategies. Repeat sequence analysis uncovered 317 SSRs and abundant tandem/dispersed repeats. Phylogenetic analyses based on 41 conserved mitochondrial PCGs illustrated its close evolutionary affinity to C. camphora and other Laurales species. Collinearity analysis indicated that the mitogenome of C. longepaniculatum had undergone extensive genomic rearrangements with its close related species. In conclusion, this research offered comprehensive insights into the organelle genetic characteristics and phylogenetic relationships of C. longepaniculatum, serving as an essential reference for subsequent investigations into the genomes of Laurales plants.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
The authors sincerely thank the personnel and bioinformatics analysis at Nanjing GENEPIONEER Biological Technology Co., Ltd (http://www.genepioneer.com).
Clinical trial number
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
- rRNA
Ribosomal RNA
- tRNA
Transfer RNA
- PCGs
Protein‑coding genes
- SSRs
Simple sequence repeats
- RSCU
Relative synonymous codon usage ratios
- ORFs
Open Reading Frames
Authors’ contributions
Yanling Fan designed the experiment and wrote the original manuscript; Linxin Tan collected the sample and prepared Figs. 1, 2 and 3; Ruizhang Feng was responsible for the production of tables, Xin Zhao conducted bioinformatical analysis; Xiangdong Xu revised the manuscript critically. The authors sincerely thank the personnel and bioinformatics analysis at Nanjing GENEPIONEER Biological Technology Co., Ltd (http://www.genepioneer.com).
Funding
This work was supported by Sichuan Province Engineering Technology Research Center of Oil Cinnamon (23YZZ01), and the Ph.D. Fund Project of Yibin University (2023QH04).
Data availability
The raw sequencing data for the Illumina Novaseq 6000 platform and Oxford Nanopore PromethION sequencing platform and the mitogenome sequences have been deposited in NCBI with accession numbers PQ591767.
Declarations
Ethical approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Yang Z, Liu B, Yang Y, Ferguson DK. Phylogeny and taxonomy of Cinnamomum (Lauraceae). Ecol Evol. 2022;12(10):e9378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yang Z, Tan C, Wei YM, Rohwer JG, Liu B, Yang Y. Floral morphology and phenology of Sassafras tzumu (Lauraceae). BMC Plant Biol. 2022;22(1):327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wu ZQ, Liao XZ, Zhang XN, Tembrock LR, Broz A. Genomic architectural variation of plant mitochondria-A review of multichromosomal structuring. J Syst Evol. 2022;60(1):160–8. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lai C, Wang J, Kan S, Zhang S, Li P, Reeve WG, Wu Z, Zhang Y. Comparative analysis of mitochondrial genomes of Broussonetia spp. (Moraceae) reveals heterogeneity in structure, synteny, intercellular gene transfer, and RNA editing. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:1052151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Møller IM, Rasmusson AG, Van Aken O. Plant mitochondria-past, present and future. Plant J. 2021;108(4):912–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Roger AJ, Muñoz-Gómez SA, Kamikawa R. The origin and diversification of mitochondria. Curr Biol. 2017;27(21):R1177–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sagan L. On the origin of mitosing cells. J Theor Biol. 1967;14(3):225–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Birky CW Jr. The inheritance of genes in mitochondria and chloroplasts: laws, mechanisms, and models. Annu Rev Genet. 2001;35:125–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wallace DC, Singh G, Lott MT, Hodge JA, Schurr TG, Lezza AM, Elsas LJ 2nd, Nikoskelainen EK. Mitochondrial DNA mutation associated with Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy. Science. 1988;242(4884):1427–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Petersen G, Cuenca A, Møller IM, Seberg O. Massive gene loss in mistletoe (Viscum, Viscaceae) mitochondria. Sci Rep. 2015;5:17588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Xiang QP, Tang JY, Yu JG, Smith DR, Zhu YM, Wang YR, Kang JS, Yang J, Zhang XC. The evolution of extremely diverged plastomes in Selaginellaceae (lycophyte) is driven by repeat patterns and the underlying DNA maintenance machinery. Plant J. 2022;111(3):768–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sloan DB, Alverson AJ, Chuckalovcak JP, Wu M, McCauley DE, Palmer JD, Taylor DR. Rapid evolution of enormous, multichromosomal genomes in flowering plant mitochondria with exceptionally high mutation rates. PLoS Biol. 2012;10(1):e1001241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sloan DB. One ring to rule them all? Genome sequencing provides new insights into the “master circle” model of plant mitochondrial DNA structure. New Phytol. 2013;200(4):978–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Adams KL, Palmer JD. Evolution of mitochondrial gene content: gene loss and transfer to the nucleus. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2003;29(3):380–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cole LW, Guo W, Mower JP, Palmer JD. High and variable rates of repeat-mediated mitochondrial genome rearrangement in a genus of plants. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35(11):2773–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kozik A, Rowan BA, Lavelle D, Berke L, Schranz ME, Michelmore RW, Christensen AC. The alternative reality of plant mitochondrial DNA: One ring does not rule them all. PLoS Genet. 2019;15(8):e1008373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sloan DB, Wu Z, Sharbrough J. Correction of persistent errors in Arabidopsis reference mitochondrial genomes. Plant Cell. 2018;30(3):525–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chen L, Dong X, Huang H, Xu H, Rono PC, Cai X, Hu G. Assembly and comparative analysis of the initial complete mitochondrial genome of Primulina hunanensis (Gesneriaceae): a cave-dwelling endangered plant. BMC Genomics. 2024;25(1):322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Liu GH, Zuo YW, Shan Y, Yu J, Li JX, Chen Y, Gong XY, Liao XM. Structural analysis of the mitochondrial genome of Santalum album reveals a complex branched configuration. Genomics. 2024;116(5):110935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Shi Y, Chen Z, Jiang J, Wu W, Yu W, Zhang S, Zeng W. The assembly and comparative analysis of the first complete mitogenome of Lindera aggregata. Front Plant Sci. 2024;15:1439245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Che F, Xu M, Yang X, Liu J, Xiao Y, Yang L. An improved approach for the isolation of essential oil from the leaves of Cinnamomum longepaniculatum using microwave-assisted hydrodistillation concatenated double-column liquid-liquid extraction. Sep Purif Technol. 2018;195:110–20. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhao X, Wei Q, Wu H, Zhou W, Liu M, Yang L, Feng R, Li M. Changes in essential oils content, antioxidant capacity and secondary metabolism in different Cinnamomum longepaniculatum varieties. Ind Crop Prod. 2023;192:115996. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zhao X, Yan Y, Zhou WH, Feng RZ, Shuai YK, Yang L, Liu MJ, He XY, Wei Q. Transcriptome and metabolome reveal the accumulation of secondary metabolites in different varieties of Cinnamomum longepaniculatum. BMC Plant Biol. 2022;22(1):243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wu D, Zhu P, Wu H, Dai H. Industry development status and prospect of Cinnamomum longepaniculatum. OALib. 2022;9:e8616. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Briscoe AG, Hopkins KP, Waeschenbach A. High-throughput sequencing of complete mitochondrial genomes. Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1452:45–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Feng S, Pozzi A, Stejskal V, Opit G, Yang Q, Shao R, Dowling DK, Li Z. Fragmentation in mitochondrial genomes in relation to elevated sequence divergence and extreme rearrangements. BMC Biol. 2022;20(1):7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Han F, Bi C, Zhao Y, Gao M, Wang Y, Chen Y. Unraveling the complex evolutionary features of the Cinnamomum camphora mitochondrial genome. Plant Cell Rep. 2024;43(7):183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yang S, Huang J, Qu Y, Zhang D, Tan Y, Wen S, Song Y. Phylogenetic incongruence in an Asiatic species complex of the genus Caryodaphnopsis (Lauraceae). BMC Plant Biol. 2024;24(1):616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bi C, Sun N, Han F, Xu K, Yang Y, Ferguson DK. The first mitogenome of Lauraceae (Cinnamomum chekiangense). Plant Divers. 2023;46(1):144–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(17):i884–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Li H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(18):3094–100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lu G, Zhang K, Que Y, Li Y. Assembly and analysis of the first complete mitochondrial genome of Punica granatum and the gene transfer from chloroplast genome. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1132551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Liu Q, Wu Z, Tian C, Yang Y, Liu L, Feng Y, Li Z. Complete mitochondrial genome of the endangered Prunus pedunculata (Prunoideae, Rosaceae) in China: characterization and phylogenetic analysis. Front Plant Sci. 2023;8(14):1266797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Koren S, Walenz BP, Berlin K, Miller JR, Bergman NH, Phillippy AM. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res. 2017;27(5):722–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9(4):357–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. Unicycler: Resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017;13(6):e1005595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wick RR, Schultz MB, Zobel J, Holt KE. Bandage: interactive visualization of de novo genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(20):3350–2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Tillich M, Lehwark P, Pellizzer T, Ulbricht-Jones ES, Fischer A, Bock R, Greiner S. GeSeq-versatile and accurate annotation of organelle genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(W1):W6-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Chan PP, Lowe TM. tRNAscan-SE: Searching for tRNA Genes in Genomic Sequences. Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1962:1–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Greiner S, Lehwark P, Bock R. OrganellarGenomeDRAW (OGDRAW) version 1.3.1: expanded toolkit for the graphical visualization of organellar genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(W1):W59–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Beier S, Thiel T, Münch T, Scholz U, Mascher M. MISA-web: a web server for microsatellite prediction. Bioinformatics. 2017;33(16):2583–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Benson G. Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27(2):573–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Krzywinski M, Schein J, Birol I, Connors J, Gascoyne R, Horsman D, Jones SJ, Marra MA. Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 2009;19(9):1639–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215(3):403–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:772–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Santorum JM, Darriba D, Taboada GL, Posada D. jmodeltest.org: selection of nucleotide substitution models on the cloud. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(9):1310–1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Togkousidis A, Kozlov OM, Haag J, Höhler D, Stamatakis A. Adaptive RAxML-NG: Accelerating Phylogenetic Inference under Maximum Likelihood using Dataset Difficulty. Mol Biol Evol. 2023;40(10):msad227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Li W, Godzik A. Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics. 2006;22(13):1658–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Marçais G, Delcher AL, Phillippy AM, Coston R, Salzberg SL, Zimin A. MUMmer4: A fast and versatile genome alignment system. PLoS Comput Biol. 2018;14(1):e1005944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Jiang M, Ni Y, Zhang J, Li J, Liu C. Complete mitochondrial genome of Mentha spicata L. reveals multiple chromosomal configurations and RNA editing events. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023;251:126257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kurtz S, Choudhuri JV, Ohlebusch E, Schleiermacher C, Stoye J, Giegerich R. REPuter: the manifold applications of repeat analysis on a genomic scale. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29(22):4633–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Mower JP. Variation in protein gene and intron content among land plant mitogenomes. Mitochondrion. 2020;53:203–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zardoya R. Recent advances in understanding mitochondrial genome diversity. F1000Res. 2020;17(9):F1000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Oldenburg DJ, Bendich AJ. DNA maintenance in plastids and mitochondria of plants. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Wynn EL, Christensen AC. Repeats of unusual size in plant mitochondrial genomes: identification, incidence and evolution. G3 (Bethesda). 2019;9(2):549–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Backert S, Nielsen BL, Borner T. The mystery of the rings: structure and replication of mitochondrial genomes from higher plants. Trends Plant Sci. 1997;2(97):477–83. [Google Scholar]
- 57.Yu R, Chen X, Long L, Jost M, Zhao R, Liu L, Mower JP, dePamphilis CW, Wanke S, Jiao Y. De novo assembly and comparative analyses of mitochondrial genomes in Piperales. Genome Biol Evol. 2023;15(3):evad041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Hershberg R, Petrov DA. Selection on codon bias. Annu Rev Genet. 2008;42:287–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Passamonti M, Calderone M, Delpero M, Plazz F. Clues of in vivo nuclear gene regulation by mitochondrial short non-coding RNAs. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):8219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Parvathy ST, Udayasuriyan V, Bhadana V. Codon usage bias. Mol Biol Rep. 2022;49(1):539–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Schuster J, Knill T, Reichelt M, Gershenzon J, Binder S. Branched-chain aminotransferase4 is part of the chain elongation pathway in the biosynthesis of methionine-derived glucosinolates in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2006;18(10):2664–79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Sheng W, Deng J, Wang C, Kuang Q. The garden asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L.) mitochondrial genome revealed rich sequence variation throughout whole sequencing data. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1140043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Jiang M, Ni Y, Li J, Liu C. Characterisation of the complete mitochondrial genome of Taraxacum mongolicum revealed five repeat-mediated recombinations. Plant Cell Rep. 2023;42(4):775–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Ma Q, Wang Y, Li S, Wen J, Zhu L, Yan K, Du Y, Ren J, Li S, Chen Z, Bi C, Li Q. Assembly and comparative analysis of the first complete mitochondrial genome of Acer truncatum Bunge: a woody oil-tree species producing nervonic acid. BMC Plant Biol. 2022;22(1):29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Gualberto JM, Mileshina D, Wallet C, Niazi AK, Weber-Lotfi F, Dietrich A. The plant mitochondrial genome: dynamics and maintenance. Biochimie. 2014;100:107–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Bi C, Lu N, Xu Y, He C, Lu Z. Characterization and analysis of the mitochondrial genome of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) by comparative genomic approaches. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(11):3778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Yang H, Li W, Yu X, Zhang X, Zhang Z, Liu Y, Wang W, Tian X. Insights into molecular structure, genome evolution and phylogenetic implication through mitochondrial genome sequence of Gleditsia sinensis. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):14850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Wang X, Zhang R, Yun Q, Xu Y, Zhao G, Liu J, Shi S, Chen Z, Jia L. Comprehensive analysis of complete mitochondrial genome of Sapindus mukorossi Gaertn.: an important industrial oil tree species in China. Ind Crop Prod. 2021;174:114210. [Google Scholar]
- 69.Cheng Y, He X, Priyadarshani SVGN, Wang Y, Ye L, Shi C, Ye K, Zhou Q, Luo Z, Deng F, Cao L, Zheng P, Aslam M, Qin Y. Assembly and comparative analysis of the complete mitochondrial genome of Suaeda glauca. BMC Genomics. 2021;22(1):167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Wang XC, Chen H, Yang D, Liu C. Diversity of mitochondrial plastid DNAs (MTPTs) in seed plants. Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal. 2018;29(4):635–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Sibbald SJ, Lawton M, Archibald JM. Mitochondrial genome evolution in Pelagophyte Algae. Genome Biol Evol. 2021;13(3):evab018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Richardson AO, Rice DW, Young GJ, Alverson AJ, Palmer JD. The “fossilized” mitochondrial genome of Liriodendron tulipifera: ancestral gene content and order, ancestral editing sites, and extraordinarily low mutation rate. BMC Biol. 2013;11:29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Anderson BM, Krause K, Petersen G. Mitochondrial genomes of two parasitic Cuscuta species lack clear evidence of horizontal gene transfer and retain unusually fragmented ccmFC genes. BMC Genomics. 2021;22(1):816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Choi KS, Park S. Complete Plastid and mitochondrial genomes of Aeginetia indica reveal intracellular gene transfer (IGT), horizontal gene transfer (HGT), and cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS). Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(11):6143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Bi C, Paterson AH, Wang X, Xu Y, Wu D, Qu Y, Jiang A, Ye Q, Ye N. Analysis of the complete mitochondrial genome sequence of the diploid cotton Gossypium raimondii by comparative genomics approaches. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:5040598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Lukeš J, Kaur B, Speijer D. RNA editing in mitochondria and plastids: weird and widespread. Trends Genet. 2021;37(2):99–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Ou T, Wu Z, Tian C, Yang Y, Li Z. Complete mitochondrial genome of Agropyron cristatum reveals gene transfer and RNA editing events. BMC Plant Biol. 2024;24(1):830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Tsai HC, Hsieh CH, Hsu CW, Hsu YH, Chien LF. Cloning and organelle expression of Bamboo mitochondrial Complex I subunits Nad1, Nad2, Nad4, and Nad5 in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(7):4054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Small ID, Schallenberg-Rüdinger M, Takenaka M, Mireau H, Ostersetzer-Biran O. Plant organellar RNA editing: what 30 years of research has revealed. Plant J. 2020;101(5):1040–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Sloan DB, MacQueen AH, Alverson AJ, Palmer JD, Taylor DR. Extensive loss of RNA editing sites in rapidly evolving Silene mitochondrial genomes: selection vs. retroprocessing as the driving force. Genetics. 2010;185(4):1369–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Handa H. The complete nucleotide sequence and RNA editing content of the mitochondrial genome of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.): comparative analysis of the mitochondrial genomes of rapeseed and Arabidopsis thaliana. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31(20):5907–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Galtier N. The intriguing evolutionary dynamics of plant mitochondrial DNA. BMC Biol. 2011;9:61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Group TAP, Chase MW, Christenhusz MJM, Fay MF, Byng JW, Judd WS, Soltis DE, Mabberley DJ, Sennikov AN, Soltis PS, Stevens PF. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Bot J Linn Soc. 2016;181:1–20. [Google Scholar]
- 84.Liu LX, Du YX, Folk RA, Wang SY, Soltis DE, Shang FD, Li P. Plastome evolution in Saxifragaceae and multiple plastid capture events involving Heuchera and Tiarella. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Yin H, Akimoto M, Kaewcheenchai R, Sotowa M, Ishii T, Ishikawa R. Inconsistent diversities between nuclear and plastid genomes of AA genome species in the genus Oryza. Genes Genet Syst. 2015;90(5):269–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Zhu W, Zhang D, Xu W, Gan Y, Huang J, Liu Y, Tan Y, Song Y, Xin P. Comparative genomics and phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial genomes of Neocinnamomum. BMC Plant Biol. 2025;25(1):289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The raw sequencing data for the Illumina Novaseq 6000 platform and Oxford Nanopore PromethION sequencing platform and the mitogenome sequences have been deposited in NCBI with accession numbers PQ591767.









