Skip to main content
JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques logoLink to JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques
. 2025 Jul 17;15(3):e24.00005. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.24.00005

Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Matthew Easthardt 1,a, Daniel Park 1,2, Phillip Zakko 1, Ju Eun Kim 3
PMCID: PMC12269813  PMID: 40678177

Abstract

Background:

The present video article describes transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), a common spine procedure, performed with use of a less common technique—utilizing a biportal endoscopic spine surgery (BESS) approach. This procedure is performed for the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Description:

The procedure is performed with the patient in the supine position. An endoscopic portal and a working portal are developed at the level of interest. Fluid is pumped into the working space with use of a standard arthroscopy tower. Using the camera endoscope to visualize; shavers, burrs, and a Kerrison rongeur are passed through the working portal to clear the disc and to create space for insertion of an interbody device. Trial TLIF cages are placed through the disc defect, which can be observed both directly and on radiograph. An appropriate final implant is placed, and percutaneous pedicle screws are typically placed at the instrumented level.

Alternatives:

Alternatives include nonoperative treatment with physical therapy, weight loss, and/or corticosteroid injection. Surgical options for degenerative spondylolisthesis include lumbar decompression and instrumented fusion. Interbody fusion can provide indirect decompression and increase fusion success rates.

Rationale:

This procedure utilizes a minimally invasive endoscopic approach with small incisions, resulting in decreased muscle trauma, which has been shown to reduce postoperative pain and recovery time.

Expected Outcomes:

Outcomes of the biportal endoscopic technique are similar to those reported for open or conventional TLIF, with the benefit of improved postoperative pain compared with those procedures.

Important Tips:

  • Position the patient on a Jackson frame with hip and thigh pads to maintain lordosis for the fusion procedure.

  • Utilize fluoroscopic guidance when determining starting points. The goal is for the portals to be centered over the ipsilateral pedicles of the targeted level.

  • It is best to maintain the camera portal in your non-dominant hand and the working portal in your dominant hand.

  • Stand on the side that the patient reports has worse pain.

  • When dissecting, there is no need to go to the lateral edge of the facet; going further can result in excessive bleeding and decreased visualization.

Acronyms and Abbreviations:

  • BESS = biportal endoscopic spine surgery

  • TLIF = transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

  • MRI = Magnetic Resonance Imaging

  • PEEK = polyetheretherketone

  • K-wire = Kirschner wire

  • CT = computed tomography

  • PROM = patient-reported outcome measure

  • VAS = visual analog scale

  • ODI = Oswestry Disability Index


Download video file (46.5MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.24.00005.vid1
Download video file (48.5MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.24.00005.vid2
Download video file (59.6MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.24.00005.vid3
Download video file (128.4MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.24.00005.vid4
Download video file (47MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.24.00005.vid5
Download video file (54.3MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.24.00005.vid6
Download video file (14.4MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.24.00005.vid7
Download video file (27MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.24.00005.vid8

Published outcomes of this procedure can be found at: World Neurosurg. 2021 Jan;145:396-404, Clin Spine Surg. 2021 Mar 1;34(2):E64-71, and Clin Orthop Surg. 2018 Jun;10(2):248-52.

Investigation performed at William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan

Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSEST/A495).

Contributor Information

Daniel Park, Email: danparkmd@gmail.com.

Phillip Zakko, Email: phillip.zakko@corewellhealth.org, philipzakko@gmail.com.

Ju Eun Kim, Email: dspfuture@hanmail.net.

References

  • 1.Kim JE, Yoo HS, Choi DJ, Park EJ, Jee SM. Comparison of Minimal Invasive Versus Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-level Lumbar Disease. Clin Spine Surg. 2021. Mar 1;34(2):E64-71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kim JE, Choi DJ. Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Arthroscopy. Clin Orthop Surg. 2018. Jun;10(2):248-52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Heo DH, Lee DC, Kim HS, Park CK, Chung H. Clinical Results and Complications of Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg. 2021. Jan;145:396-404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kim JE, Yoo HS, Choi DJ, Hwang JH, Park EJ, Chung S. Learning Curve and Clinical Outcome of Biportal Endoscopic-Assisted Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Biomed Res Int. 2020. Dec 17;2020:8815432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Malham G, Seex K, Rao PJ. Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF. J Spine Surg. 2015. Dec;1(1):2-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zakko P, Lipphardt M, Park DK. Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Advertisement or Game Changer? Instr Course Lect. 2023;72:675-87. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Glassman SD, Carreon LY, Ghogawala Z, Foley KT, McGirt MJ, Asher AL. Benefit of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion vs Posterolateral Spinal Fusion in Lumbar Spine Disorders: A Propensity-Matched Analysis From the National Neurosurgical Quality and Outcomes Database Registry. Neurosurgery. 2016. Sep;79(3):397-405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kim JE, Choi DJ, Park EJ. Evaluation of Postoperative Spinal Epidural Hematoma After Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery for Single-Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. World Neurosurg. 2019. Jun;126:e786-92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Li Y, Gao SJ, Hu X, Lin SS. Comparison of efficacy between unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023. Aug 25;102(34):e34705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Barbosa TP, Raposo AR, Cunha PD, Cruz Oliveira N, Lobarinhas A, Varanda P, Direito-Santos B. Rehabilitation after cervical and lumbar spine surgery. EFORT Open Rev. 2023. Aug 1;8(8):626-38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kou Y, Chang J, Guan X, Chang Q, Feng H. Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg. 2021. Aug;152:e352-68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sim DS, Sim CHS, Jiang L, Ling ZM. Single-Level Endoscopic TLIF Has Decreased Surgery Duration, Blood Loss, and Length of Hospital Stay While Achieving Similar 1-Year Clinical and Radiological Outcomes Compared With Conventional Minimally Invasive TLIF. Int J Spine Surg. 2023. Jun;17(3):380-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES