Skip to main content
ACG Case Reports Journal logoLink to ACG Case Reports Journal
. 2025 Jul 18;12(7):e01772. doi: 10.14309/crj.0000000000001772

Tacrolimus-Induced Acute Esophageal Necrosis Postorthotopic Liver Transplantation

Wei Tang 1,, Makeda Dawkins 2, Daniel Basta 1, Nao Hara 3, Fouzia Shakil 3, Bodin Roxana 2, Shireen Pais 4, Kenji Okumura 5, Seigo Nishida 5, Abhay Dhand 6
PMCID: PMC12273670  PMID: 40689057

ABSTRACT

Acute esophageal necrosis, or “black esophagus,” is a rare but severe condition characterized by circumferential black necrotized esophageal mucosa with an abrupt transition at the gastroesophageal junction. The “two-hit” hypothesis suggests that an initial ischemic insult predisposes the esophageal mucosa to further injury from luminal acid exposure or medications. We present the first documented case of tacrolimus-induced acute esophageal necrosis without preceding hemodynamic instability in a liver transplant recipient, which resolved with discontinuation of tacrolimus and transition to cyclosporin.

KEYWORDS: acute esophageal necrosis, tacrolimus, liver transplant, immunosuppression, gastrointestinal toxicity

INTRODUCTION

Acute esophageal necrosis (AEN), or “black esophagus,” is a rare but severe condition characterized by circumferential black necrotized esophageal mucosa with an abrupt transition at the gastroesophageal junction.1 The pathogenesis follows a “two-hit” hypothesis, where an initial ischemic insult due to low perfusion, often in setting of systemic hypotension, predisposes the esophageal mucosa to severe topical injury from luminal acid exposure, infections, medications, and other etiologies.2,3

Various medications, including antibiotics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antihypertensives, and antipsychotics, have been implicated as potential triggers. In addition, chronic medical conditions such as diabetes mellitus, atherosclerotic arterial disease, malnutrition, and chronic kidney disease may confer an increased risk of AEN.46

Tacrolimus (TAC), a calcineurin inhibitor, is widely used for immunosuppression in transplant recipients. While the association between TAC and AEN has been previously reported in a renal transplant recipient,7 and its link to gastric and colonic ulcers has been described in 2 cardiac transplant recipients,8,9 we report the first documented case of TAC-induced AEN in a liver transplant recipient.

CASE REPORT

A 54-year-old man with a history of insulin-dependent diabetes was initiated on TAC (5 mg twice daily) and prednisone (20 mg daily) after orthoptic liver transplantation. His immediate post-transplant course was complicated by acute kidney injury and altered mentation suspected secondary to TAC nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity in the setting of a supratherapeutic TAC level of 14 ng/mL (goal 10-12 ng/mL). Two weeks after transplantation, TAC was transitioned to cyclosporine (200 mg twice daily). The patient remained clinically and serologically stable on cyclosporine; however, 3 months after the transition, repeat laboratory testing revealed elevated aspartate aminotransferase to 461 U/L, alanine aminotransferase to 551 U/L, alkaline phosphatase to 386 U/L, and total bilirubin of 0.8 mg/dL concerning for allograft rejection. Cyclosporine was discontinued, and TAC was reinitiated (starting at 5 mg twice daily and titrated to a target trough level of 8–10 ng/mL), resulting in rapid normalization of liver enzyme levels.

Two months later, the patient presented with 2 weeks of nausea, hematochezia, odynophagia, and early satiety. He was hemodynamically stable, and patient appeared euvolemic on examination. Repeat laboratory tests noted normal aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, and bilirubin with a hemoglobin of 11.7 g/dL and TAC level of 7.0 ng/mL (goal 8-10 ng/mL).

A contrast-enhanced chest computed tomography revealed diffuse mid-to-distal esophageal thickening. Subsequent esophagogastroduodenoscopy demonstrated diffuse circumferential erosive esophageal mucosa with friability, black necrosis, and mucosal ulcerations, sparing of the gastroesophageal junction (Figure 1). Histopathology confirmed mucosal ulceration with acute and chronic inflammation, and necrosis without evidence of viral, fungal, or bacterial infection.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Endoscopic finding of acute esophageal necrosis. Endoscopic view of the mid-esophagus (A) showing circumferential erythema, friability, necrosis, and active bleeding extending caudally to the distal esophagus (B) with sharp demarcation at the gastroesophageal junction.

In the absence of alternative etiologies, he was diagnosed with AEN suspected secondary to TAC; thus, tacrolimus was discontinued, and cyclosporine was reintroduced. Supportive management was initiated, including administration of intravenous fluids, high-dose proton pump inhibitors, and nil per os status, leading to gradual symptomatic improvement over 1 week.

At 3-month follow-up, the patient endorsed mild dysphagia to solids. Repeat esophagogastroduodenoscopy showed resolution of necrotizing esophagitis with residual ulceration at the middle to distal esophagus and a new benign 8-mm distal esophageal stricture, successfully dilated to 12 mm via a Savary 10 mm through-the-scope balloon (Figure 2). The patient remained symptom-free at 1-year follow-up.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Endoscopic evolution of acute esophageal necrosis. Interval endoscopic assessment 3 months later with (A) residual longitudinal ulceration and (B) a distal esophageal stricture.

DISCUSSION

AEN is a rare clinicopathologic entity with a reported prevalence ranging from 0.01% to 0.28% upon diagnostic endoscopic.10 Due to its rarity, there are no current standardized management guidelines; however, it carries an overall mortality rate of approximately 30%, largely due to life-threatening complications such as esophageal perforation (∼7%) and uncontrolled esophageal bleeding.5,6

Tacrolimus is the primary agent used for immunosuppression in solid organ transplant recipients. Its side effect profile includes nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, and gastrointestinal toxicity, such as colitis.11 Although AEN is not a well-established association, case reports have suggested a possible association between TAC use and AEN in renal transplant recipients.7 The exact mechanism of gastrointestinal injury remains unclear but is believed to involve crypt abnormalities, mucosal destruction, and apoptosis. A retrospective review of colonic samples from 20 patients receiving TAC monotherapy identified no necrosis but neutrophilic cryptitis (60%), apoptotic crypt cells (55%), and crypt destruction (35%), and more than half of these patients had endoscopic colitis, reflecting possible drug-induced immune dysregulation.12 Notably, CNIs can also cause arterial endothelial impairment, disrupting the balance between vasodilators and vasoconstrictors, and promoting vascular inflammation via toll-like receptor-4 signaling, as seen in TAC-associated cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome.1315

In our case, TAC may have played a central role in the “two-hit” AEN mechanism via vascular endothelial injury, vasoconstriction, and vascular inflammation, culminating in esophageal necrosis (Figure 3). The patient's risk factors, including age over 50 years, male sex, and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, further predisposed him to AEN, while his history of presumed TAC-induced nephrotoxicity may suggest an idiosyncratic response and heightened susceptibility to vascular injury, also increasing his risk of AEN development.3 This case highlights the need for clinicians understand the proposed AEN pathophysiology and recognize the interrelation among various side effects as reported in the literature.16

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Pathophysiology of acute esophageal necrosis.

Evaluation of possible underlying etiologies should include a thorough medication review, screening for superimposed bacterial, fungal, or viral infections, and evaluation of underlying comorbid conditions. In the present case, a comprehensive infectious workup, along with histopathological evaluation of esophageal biopsy obtained during EGD—including special stains for bacterial, fungal, and viral organisms—revealed no evidence of infection. Furthermore, a detailed review of the patient's medication list identified no agents other than tacrolimus with the potential to cause esophageal necrosis. In addition to cessation of the offending agent, conservative treatment is the mainstay of management, including hydration, acid suppression therapy, total parenteral nutrition (if indicated), and sucralfate. Severe cases may surgical intervention for perforation or abscess formation.6 Esophageal strictures, as observed in this case, are the most common long-term complication of AEN, reported in 25% to 40% of patients, and can be successfully treated with balloon dilation, esophageal stents, or surgery.17 In this case, TAC discontinuation led to both clinical and endoscopic resolution of AEN.

This case of tacrolimus-induced AEN highlights a possible rare but fatal adverse effect of a commonly used immunosuppressive agent. Diagnosis of AEN requires an initial broad differential and high index of suspicion. Clinicians should recognize key triggering events, prior ischemic insults, and chronic conditions as risk factors for AEN, as early detection and discontinuation of the offending agent can significantly improve patient outcomes.

DISCLOSURES

Author contributions: All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this article, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given their approval for this version to be published. Abhay Dhand is the article guarantor.

Financial disclosure: None to report.

Informed consent was obtained for this case report.

Footnotes

*

Wei Tang and Makeda Dawkins contributed equally to this work.

Contributor Information

Makeda Dawkins, Email: Makeda.Dawkins@wmchealth.org.

Daniel Basta, Email: daniel.basta@wmchealth.org.

Nao Hara, Email: nao.hara@wmchealth.org.

Fouzia Shakil, Email: fouzia.shakil@wmchealth.org.

Bodin Roxana, Email: roxana.bodin@wmchealth.org.

Shireen Pais, Email: shireen.pais@wmchealth.org.

Kenji Okumura, Email: kenji.okumura@wmchealth.org.

Seigo Nishida, Email: seigo.nishida@wmchealth.org.

Abhay Dhand, Email: abhay.dhand@wmchealth.org.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Gurvits GE, Shapsis A, Lau N, Gualtieri N, Robilotti JG. Acute esophageal necrosis: A rare syndrome. J Gastroenterol 2007;42(1):29–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gurvits GE. Black esophagus: Acute esophageal necrosis syndrome. World J Gastroenterol 2010;16(26):3219–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dias E, Santos-Antunes J, Macedo G. Diagnosis and management of acute esophageal necrosis. Ann Gastroenterol 2019;32(6):529–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Augusto F, Fernandes V, Cremers MI, et al. Acute necrotizing esophagitis: A large retrospective case series. Endoscopy 2004;36(5):411–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Abdullah HM, Ullah W, Abdallah M, Khan U, Hurairah A, Atiq M. Clinical presentations, management, and outcomes of acute esophageal necrosis: A systemic review. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019;13(5):507–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Schizas D, Theochari NA, Mylonas KS, et al. Acute esophageal necrosis: A systematic review and pooled analysis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2020;12(3):104–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wanta K, Abegunde AT. Tacrolimus-induced acute esophageal necrosis. ACG Case Rep J 2020;7(6):e00396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pan D, Shaye O, Kobashigawa JA. Tacrolimus-associated diffuse gastrointestinal ulcerations and pathergy: A case report. Transplant Proc 2017;49(1):216–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Vazquez-Reyes R, Yeoh A, Kamal A. Tacrolimus-induced esophageal and colon ulcers. ACG Case Rep J 2023;10(6):e01072. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Inayat F, Hurairah A, Virk HU. Acute esophageal necrosis: An update. N Am J Med Sci 2016;8(7):320–2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nankivell BJ, P'Ng CH, O'Connell PJ, Chapman JR. Calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity through the lens of longitudinal histology: Comparison of cyclosporine and tacrolimus eras. Transplantation 2016;100(8):1723–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hissong E, Mostyka M, Yantiss RK. Histologic features of tacrolimus-induced colonic injury. Am J Surg Pathol 2022;46(1):118–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lamas S. Cellular mechanisms of vascular injury mediated by calcineurin inhibitors. Kidney Int 2005;68(2):898–907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rodrigues-Diez R, Gonzalez-Guerrero C, Ocana-Salceda C, et al. Calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporine A and tacrolimus induce vascular inflammation and endothelial activation through TLR4 signaling. Sci Rep 2016;6:27915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kodama S, Mano T, Masuzawa A, et al. Tacrolimus-induced reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome with delayed multi-segmental vasoconstriction. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2017;26(5):e75–e77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Vicari-Christensen M, Repper S, Basile S, Young D. Tacrolimus: Review of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenetics to facilitate practitioners' understanding and offer strategies for educating patients and promoting adherence. Prog Transplant 2009;19(3):277–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gurvits GE, Cherian K, Shami MN, et al. Black esophagus: New insights and multicenter international experience in 2014. Dig Dis Sci 2015;60(2):444–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from ACG Case Reports Journal are provided here courtesy of American College of Gastroenterology

RESOURCES