Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2025 Jun 20;17(6):e86428. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86428

Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

Marina Katerini 1,, Ioanna V Papathanasiou 2, Lambrini Kourkouta 3, Konstantinos Koukourikos 3, Theodosios Paralikas 2, Maria Malliarou 2, Areti Tsaloglidou 3
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC12276721  PMID: 40688834

Abstract

Introduction

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia occurring after cardiac surgery. It can lead to hemodynamic instability and significantly increase the risk of thromboembolic events.

Aim

The primary aim of this study was to assess the incidence of AF in patients undergoing cardiac surgery during the first postoperative week. The secondary aim was to investigate the influence of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors on the development of postoperative AF (POAF).

Materials and methods

This study included 140 patients of all ages and both sexes who underwent cardiac surgery and were admitted to the ICU of the General Hospital of Athens “Ippokrateio.” All participants had no prior history of AF but developed a POAF episode lasting more than 30 seconds within the first postoperative week. Data were collected from the patients’ medical records.

Results

Among the 140 patients, 42.9% developed POAF. The incidence of POAF was significantly higher in patients who were taking diuretics (62.2% vs. 33.7%; p = 0.001) and in those who underwent mitral valve replacement (64.3% vs. 37.5%; p = 0.010). POAF was also associated with lower ejection fraction (p = 0.003), higher preoperative CRP levels (p < 0.001), longer duration of intubation (p = 0.015), longer cross-clamp time (p = 0.016), and extended ICU stay (p = 0.005). Furthermore, postoperative hemoglobin (p = 0.050) and hematocrit (p = 0.044) levels were significantly lower in POAF cases, while postoperative CRP levels were significantly higher (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

POAF is associated with multiple risk factors, including mitral valve surgery, prolonged ICU stay, low ejection fraction, extended cross-clamp time, and longer ventilation duration. Additionally, the use of diuretics and elevated CRP levels were significantly linked to the occurrence of POAF.

Keywords: arrythmias, atrial fibrillation, cardiac surgery, postoperative period, risk factors

Introduction

Increased life expectancy and the rising prevalence of cardiovascular disease in older populations have led to a significant increase in cardiac surgeries. As people live longer, age-related heart conditions requiring surgical intervention are becoming more common [1]. Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is the most frequent sustained arrhythmia following cardiac surgery and is associated with longer hospital stays, increased healthcare costs, complications, thromboembolic events, and higher mortality rates [2].

Overall, approximately 15-30% of cardiac surgery patients develop POAF [3]. The incidence varies by type of surgery: patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) have a relatively lower risk (about 20%), whereas those undergoing valve replacement surgeries have a higher incidence (around 50%). The risk is even greater in patients undergoing combined CABG and valve procedures [4]. Rates of POAF also remain high following aortic surgery, ranging between 30% and 50% [5].

POAF is defined as new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) occurring after surgery in patients without a prior history of arrhythmia [6]. The risk factors associated with the development of POAF can be broadly categorized into patient-related factors, such as age, sex, and comorbidities, and surgery-related factors, including the type of surgery performed. Additionally, there are reversible causes of POAF, the correction of which can potentially restore sinus rhythm promptly [7].

The aim of the present study is to evaluate the incidence of AF in patients undergoing cardiac surgery during the first postoperative week. The secondary aim is to examine the influence of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables on the development of POAF.

The pathogenesis of POAF is multifactorial and differs from that of nonsurgical AF, as cardiac surgery introduces specific conditions that contribute to its onset [8]. Key mechanisms involved in POAF include atrial myocardial injury, pericardial effusion and inflammation, gap junction uncoupling, peri-atrial fat metabolism, autonomic nervous system modulation, ion channel alterations, re-entry circuits, and ectopic activity in the pulmonary veins [9].

Beyond advanced age, other clinical risk factors for POAF after cardiac surgery include increased left atrial diameter, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, and a history of heart failure (HF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, and myocardial infarction. However, a meta-analysis found that body mass index, beta-blocker use, sex, and dyslipidemia were not significantly associated with POAF incidence [10].

Advanced age is not only a risk factor for morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery [1], but also one of the strongest predictors of POAF, with incidence rates rising sharply after age 50 [11]. For example, a study by Shen et al. reported that the incidence of POAF was 25% at age 60, 40% at age 70, and 50% at age 80 [12].

Management of POAF includes the use of beta-blockers, amiodarone, statins, and oral anticoagulants. Moreover, several studies have demonstrated that postoperative supplementation with magnesium [13] and vitamin D [14] can significantly reduce the risk of developing POAF.

Materials and methods

Study design and data collection

This study utilized a retrospective chart review to collect data from existing medical records and telemetry/ECG monitoring documentation, as outlined below. Information gathered included demographic and social characteristics, medical history, type of surgery, medications, and the results of relevant laboratory and imaging tests.

The study sample comprised 140 patients, both men and women of all ages, who underwent cardiac surgery and were admitted to the ICU of the General Hospital of Athens “Ippokrateio.” Patient data were collected over a 22-month period, from September 2020 to June 2022.

Inclusion criteria required that patients have no prior history of AF and experience a POAF episode lasting more than 30 seconds during the first week of hospitalization. All patients had continuous heart rhythm and heart rate monitoring via ECG telemetry during their stay in the resuscitation unit, where they typically remained for the first 48 hours post-surgery. Patients were then transferred to the cardiac surgery ward, where telemetry monitoring was used if arrhythmia was suspected. The preferred method for accurate rhythm assessment was ECG or telemetry, both performed by a physician and monitored by a trained ward nurse.

Exclusion criteria

Patients were excluded from the study if they met any of the following criteria: undergoing emergency surgery, being under 18 years of age, having a history of AF (either paroxysmal or chronic), or presenting with hepatic dysfunction, uncontrolled HF, or a history of previous cardiac surgery (redo surgery).

Statistical analysis

Quantitative variables were presented as mean ± SD or as median with IQR, while categorical variables were expressed as absolute numbers and percentages. The chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test were used to compare proportions. For comparisons of continuous variables between patients who developed POAF and those who did not, Student’s t-test and the Mann-Whitney U test were applied, as appropriate.

A stepwise logistic regression analysis (entry criterion: p = 0.05; removal criterion: p = 0.10) was conducted to identify independent predictors of POAF. Adjusted ORs with 95% CIs were calculated from the regression model. All p-values were two-tailed, and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 27.0 (Released 2019; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

Study ethics

The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Scientific Council and the Research Ethics Committee of the General Hospital of Athens “IPPOKRATEIO,” granting access to electronic medical records and permission to collect and process data. The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Results

The study sample included 140 patients who underwent cardiac surgery, the majority of whom were male (105 patients, 75%). In terms of age distribution, 33 patients (23.6%) were under 60 years old, 56 (40.0%) were between 61 and 70 years old, and 51 (36.4%) were aged 71 years or older. Regarding smoking status, 41 patients (29.3%) were active smokers, 48 (34.3%) were nonsmokers, and 51 (36.4%) were former smokers. Among the active smokers, 18 patients (43.9%) reported smoking one to 15 cigarettes per day, while 23 (56.1%) smoked more than 16 cigarettes daily. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the study population.

¹ Refers only to active smokers

BSA, body surface area

Characteristic Category n %
Gender Men 105 75
Women 35 25
Age (years) ≤60 33 23.6
61-70 56 40
≥71 51 36.4
BMI Normal 38 27.1
Overweight 60 42.9
Obese 42 30
Smoking status Active smokers 41 29.3
Nonsmokers 48 34.3
Former smokers 51 36.4
Cigarettes/day¹ 1-15 18 43.9
≥16 23 56.1
Continuous variables Mean (SD) Median (IQR)
Age 67.3 (8.6) 68 (61-74)
BSA 1.93 (0.17) 1.92 (1.82-2.06)
BMI 28 (4.3) 27.7 (24.7-30.7)

The clinical characteristics of the study participants are summarized in Table 2. Among the 140 patients, 73 (52.1%) had coronary artery disease (CAD), 44 (31.4%) had valvular heart disease, and 23 (16.4%) had both CAD and valvular disease. A family history of CAD was reported by 52 patients (37.1%). Based on the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification, 15 patients (10.7%) were categorized as NYHA I, 104 (74.3%) as NYHA II, and 21 (15.0%) as NYHA III.

Table 2. Clinical characteristics of study participants.

¹ Multiple responses were allowed

ACEi, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; AF, atrial fibrillation; ARBs, angiotensin II receptor blockers; AVR, aortic valve replacement; BSA, body surface area; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; CAD, coronary artery disease; CCBs, calcium channel blockers; CKD, chronic kidney disease; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CPK, creatine phosphokinase; CVA, cerebrovascular accident; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; DM, diabetes mellitus; ECC, extracorporeal circulation; EF, ejection fraction; HCT, hematocrit; HGB, hemoglobin; ICU, intensive care unit; K, potassium; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; MVR, mitral valve replacement; NYHA, New York Heart Association; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SR, sinus rhythm

Clinical characteristics n %
Heart disease CAD 73 52.1
Heart valve disease 44 31.4
CAD and heart valve disease 23 16.4
Family history No 88 62.9
Yes 52 37.1
ΝΥΗΑ I 15 10.7
II 104 74.3
III 21 15
Comorbidities Hypertension 132 94.3
DM 53 37.9
COPD 27 19.3
Dyslipidemia 120 85.7
CVA 14 10
CKD 8 5.7
Medication Aspirin 96 68.6
Clopidogrel 40 28.6
Beta-blockers 111 79.3
ACEi 63 45
ARBs 36 25.7
CCBs 28 20
Statins 116 82.9
Diuretics 45 32.1
Nitrates 31 22.1
Inotropic drugs 62 44.3
Type of surgery¹ CABG 91 65
AVR 39 27.9
MVR 28 20
ECC No 6 4.3
Yes 134 95.7
ECG at discharge SR 131 93.6
AF 5 3.6
Paced rhythm 4 2.9
In-hospital mortality No 137 97.9
Yes 3 2.1
Continuous variables Mean (SD) Median (IQR)
SBP 144.8 (8.1) 145 (142-151)
DBP 79 (4) 79 (77-82)
EF (%) 52.4 (9.6) 55 (47.5-60)
WBC (pre) 8.1 (2.2) 7.7 (6.6-9.1)
HGb (pre) 13.5 (1.4) 13.9 (12.6-14.5)
HCT (pre) 41.3 (4.7) 42.2 (39.2-44.2)
Creatinine (pre) 0.99 (0.24) 0.9 (0.9-1.1)
CRP (pre) 1.52 (1.48) 0.9 (0.4-2.2)
K (pre) 4.55 (0.37) 4.5 (4.3-4.8)
LDH (pre) 324.3 (512.8) 256 (227.5-311.5)
CPK (pre) 92.6 (84.3) 76 (51-97)
ECC (min) 97.6 (38.2) 97 (76.5-118.5)
Duration of operation (hours) 4.32 (0.92) 4 (4-5)
Ventilation support (hours of intubation) 19.7 (12.8) 17 (11-24)
Cross-clamping time (minutes) 65.2 (38.3) 66.5 (46-91.5)
ICU stay (days) 2.8 (1.28) 3 (2-4)
WBC (post) 10.8 (3) 10.7 (8.6-12.7)
HGB (post) 11 (2.8) 10.9 (9.8-11.9)
HCT (post) 33 (4.9) 33.5 (29.4-36.2)
Creatinine (post) 1.08 (0.32) 1 (0.9-1.2)
K (post) 4.21 (0.28) 4.1 (4-4.4)
LDH (post) 459.5 (287.8) 436 (348.5-505)
CPK (post) 425.8 (215) 348 (305.5-505.5)
CRP (post) 1.9 (1.6) 1.2 (0.7-2.8)

Hypertension was the most prevalent comorbidity, observed in 132 patients (94.3%), followed by dyslipidemia in 120 (85.7%), diabetes mellitus in 53 (37.9%), chronic respiratory failure in 27 (19.3%), stroke in 14 (10.0%), and chronic kidney disease in eight patients (5.7%). Regarding medication use, 116 patients (82.9%) were on statins, 111 (79.3%) were receiving β-blockers, and 96 (68.6%) were taking aspirin.

In terms of surgical procedures, 91 patients (65.0%) underwent CABG, 39 (27.9%) had aortic valve replacement (AVR), and 28 (20.0%) underwent mitral valve replacement (MVR). The in-hospital mortality rate among the study population was 2.1% (three patients).

Postoperative arrhythmia was observed in 66 patients (47.1%). Among these, 60 patients (42.9%) experienced episodes of POAF, while six patients (4.2%) developed third-degree atrioventricular block during hospitalization. The diagnosis of in-hospital POAF was confirmed in all cases using a 12-lead ECG. This diagnostic test was performed either following the detection of arrhythmia through continuous ECG monitoring, particularly during the first 48 hours after cardiac surgery, or during routine physical examination.

All cases of POAF were treated with amiodarone. Notably, every POAF episode occurred within the first four days following surgery, with the highest incidence observed on postoperative day 2 (40.0%) and day 3 (41.7%). Figure 1 illustrates the frequency of POAF across the first four postoperative days.

Figure 1. Frequency of AF occurrence during the first four postoperative days.

Figure 1

AF, atrial fibrillation

The association between demographic characteristics and POAF is presented in Table 3. The incidence of POAF was significantly higher in women than in men (57.1% vs. 38.1%; p = 0.049). No significant associations were found between POAF and other demographic variables.

Table 3. Association between demographic characteristics and POAF.

+ p-value from Pearson’s chi-square test

p-value from Student’s t-test

¹ Refers only to active smokers

BSA, body surface area; POAF, postoperative atrial fibrillation

Demographic characteristics POAF χ² (df) p
No (n = 80; 57.1%) Yes (n = 60; 42.9%)
n (%) n (%)
Gender Men 65 (61.9) 40 (38.1) 3.89 (1) 0.049+
Women 15 (42.9) 20 (57.1)
Age ≤60 20 (60.6) 13 (39.4) 1.24 (2) 0.537+
61-70 34 (60.7) 22 (39.3)
71+ 26 (51.0) 25 (49.0)
BMI Normal 22 (57.9) 16 (42.1) 0.14 (2) 0.932+
Overweight 35 (58.3) 25 (41.7)
Obese 23 (54.8) 19 (45.2)
Smoking Active smokers 26 (63.4) 15 (36.6) 4.77 (2) 0.092+
Nonsmokers 31 (64.6) 17 (35.4)
Former smokers 23 (45.1) 28 (54.9)
Cigarettes/day¹ 1-15 14 (77.8) 4 (22.2) 2.85 (1) 0.091+
16+ 12 (52.2) 11 (47.8)
Continuous variables Mean (SD) Mean (SD) t (df)  
Age 66.5 (8.6) 68.3 (8.6) 1.22 (138) 0.225
BSA 1.94 (0.17) 1.93 (0.18) -0.42 (138) 0.674
BMI 28.2 (4.6) 27.7 (3.8) -0.62 (138) 0.538

The association between clinical characteristics and the occurrence of POAF is presented in Table 4. The incidence of POAF was significantly higher among patients who were receiving diuretics and those who underwent MVR. Additionally, POAF was significantly associated with lower ejection fraction, elevated preoperative CRP levels, longer intubation time, extended cross-clamp duration, and prolonged ICU stay.

Table 4. Association between clinical characteristics and POAF.

+ p-value from Pearson’s chi-square test

++ p-value from Fisher’s exact test

p-value from Student’s t-test

‡‡ p-value from Mann-Whitney test

¹ Multiple responses were allowed

ACEi, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; ARBs, angiotensin II receptor blockers; AVR, aortic valve replacement; CABG, coronary artery bypass surgery; CAD, coronary artery disease; CCBs, calcium channel blockers; CKD, chronic kidney disease; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CPK, creatine phosphokinase; CVA, cerebral vascular accident; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; DM, diabetes mellitus; ECC, extracorporeal circulation; EF, ejection fraction; HCT, hematocrit; HGB, hemoglobin; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; MVR, mitral valve replacement; NYHA, New York Heart Association; SBP, systolic blood pressure

Clinical characteristics POAF χ² (df) p
No (n = 80; 57.1%) Yes (n = 60; 42.9%)
n (%) n (%)
Heart disease CAD 46 (63.0) 27 (37.0) 2.62 (2) 0.269+
Heart valve disease 21 (47.7) 23 (52.3)
CAD and heart valve disease 13 (56.5) 10 (43.5)
Family history No 53 (60.2) 35 (39.8) 0.92 (1) 0.337+
Yes 27 (51.9) 25 (48.1)
ΝΥΗΑ I 10 (66.7) 5 (33.3) 1.35 (2) 0.510+
II 60 (57.7) 44 (42.3)
III 10 (47.6) 11 (52.4)
Comorbidities
Hypertension No 7 (87.5) 1 (12.5) 3.19 (1) 0.138++
Yes 73 (55.3) 59 (44.7)
DM No 52 (59.8) 35 (40.2) 0.65 (1) 0.421+
Yes 28 (52.8) 25 (47.2)
COPD No 67 (59.3) 46 (40.7) 1.11 (1) 0.293+
Yes 13 (48.1) 14 (51.9)
Dyslipidemia No 11 (55.0) 9 (45.0) 0.04 (1) 0.834+
Yes 69 (57.5) 51 (42.5)
CVA No 71 (56.3) 55 (43.7) 0.32 (1) 0.569+
Yes 9 (64.3) 5 (35.7)
CKD No 76 (57.6) 56 (42.4) 0.18 (1) 0.724++
Yes 4 (50.0) 4 (50.0)
Medication
Aspirin No 28 (63.6) 16 (36.4) 1.11 (1) 0.293+
Yes 52 (54.2) 44 (45.8)
Clopidogrel No 61 (61.0) 39 (39.0) 2.13 (1) 0.145+
Yes 19 (47.5) 21 (52.5)
Beta-blockers No 16 (55.2) 13 (44.8) 0.06 (1) 0.810+
Yes 64 (57.7) 47 (42.3)
ACEi No 42 (54.5) 35 (45.5) 0.47 (1) 0.492+
Yes 38 (60.3) 25 (39.7)
ARB No 63 (60.6) 41 (39.4) 1.95 (1) 0.163+
Yes 17 (47.2) 19 (52.8)
CCB No 67 (59.8) 45 (40.2) 1.64 (1) 0.200+
Yes 13 (46.4) 15 (53.6)
Statins No 13 (54.2) 11 (45.8) 0.11 (1) 0.746+
Yes 67 (57.8) 49 (42.2)
Diuretics No 63 (66.3) 32 (33.7) 10.16 (1) 0.001+
Yes 17 (37.8) 28 (62.2)
Nitrates No 63 (57.8) 46 (42.2) 0.09 (1) 0.769+
Yes 17 (54.8) 14 (45.2)
Amiodarone No 80 (57.6) 59 (42.4) 1.34 (1) 0.429++
Yes 0 (0.0) 1 (100.0)
Inotropic drugs No 44 (56.4) 34 (43.6) 0.04 (1) 0.844+
Yes 36 (58.1) 26 (41.9)
Type of surgery¹
CABG No 25 (51.0) 24 (49.0) 1.15 (1) 0.283+
Yes 55 (60.4) 36 (39.6)
AVR No 57 (56.4) 44 (43.6) 0.07 (1) 0.786+
Yes 23 (59.0) 16 (41.0)
MVR No 70 (62.5) 42 (37.5) 6.56 (1) 0.010+
Yes 10 (35.7) 18 (64.3)
ECC No 5 (83.3) 1 (16.7) 1.76 (1) 0.238++
Yes 75 (56.0) 59 (44.0)
In-hospital mortality No 80 (58.4) 57 (41.6) 4.09 (1) 0.076++
Yes 0 (0.0) 3 (100.0)
Continuous variables Mean (SD) Mean (SD) t (df)  
SBP 144.5 (8.8) 145.3 (7.2) 0.56 (138) 0.579
DBP 79.1 (4.1) 78.9 (3.8) -0.33 (138) 0.746
Continuous variables Median (IQR) Median (IQR) U value  
EF (%) 55 (50-60) 50 (45-55) 1702 0.003‡‡
WBC (pre) 7.8 (6.5-9.1) 7.7 (6.6-9.1) 2322 0.743‡‡
HGb (pre) 14.1 (12.8-14.5) 13.4 (12.3-14.5) 2027 0.116‡‡
HCT (pre) 42.5 (39.4-43.9) 42 (38.5-44.5) 2212 0.429‡‡
Creatinine (pre) 0.9 (0.9-1) 0.95 (0.8-1.1) 2187.5 0.357‡‡
CRP (pre) 0.5 (0.2-0.85) 2.25 (1.55-3.5) 388 <0.001‡‡
K (pre) 4.5 (4.3-4.8) 4.5 (4.2-4.8) 2062.5 0.150‡‡
LDH (pre) 247.5 (223-304) 272.5 (235.5-321) 1972.5 0.072‡‡
CPK (pre) 79.5 (62.5-99.5) 75 (45-95) 2052 0.143‡‡
ECC (min) 91 (76.5-113.5) 102.5 (76.5-125) 2059.5 0.152‡‡
Duration of operation (hours) 4 (4-5) 4 (4-5) 2068.5 0.135‡‡
Ventilation support (hours of intubation) 14 (10.5-20) 20 (12-26) 1824.5 0.015‡‡
Cross-clamping time (minutes) 61 (44-84) 73.5 (55.5-99) 1826.5 0.016‡‡
ICU stay (days) 2 (2-3) 3 (2-4) 1756 0.005‡‡
WBC (post) 10.5 (8.4-12.6) 11.1 (8.7-12.9) 2243.5 0.510‡‡
HGB (post) 11.3 (10.2-12) 10.4 (9.4-11.4) 1935 0.050‡‡
HCT (post) 34.3 (30.5-36.5) 32.1 (28.3-35.7) 1922 0.044‡‡
Creatinine (post) 1 (0.9-1.15) 1.1 (0.9-1.3) 1951 0.055‡‡
K (post) 4.15 (4-4.4) 4.1 (4-4.4) 2386 0.953‡‡
LDH (post) 427.5 (334.5-492.5) 449.5 (370-512) 2173.5 0.340‡‡
CPK (post) 386 (305.5-535.5) 346.5 (304-469.5) 2218.5 0.445‡‡
CRP (post) 0.8 (0.4-1.1) 2.8 (2.1-3.9) 306 <0.001‡‡

The results of the multiple logistic regression analysis are presented in Table 5. Two factors were found to be significantly associated with the development of POAF: undergoing MVR and the length of ICU stay. Specifically, a longer ICU stay was associated with an increased likelihood of developing POAF. Additionally, patients who underwent MVR were 2.77 times more likely to experience POAF compared to those who did not.

Table 5. Multiple logistic regression results with POAF as the dependent variable.

MVR, mitral valve replacement; POAF, postoperative atrial fibrillation

Variable OR 95% CI p
ICU stay (days) 1.39 1.05-1.83 0.023
MVR (yes vs. no) 2.77 1.15-6.67 0.023

Discussion

Despite advances in both prevention and treatment, POAF remains one of the most common and clinically significant arrhythmias following cardiac surgery. Its incidence remains high, ranging from 20% to 55% [15], and it is associated with a fourfold increase in thromboembolic events and a twofold increase in mortality compared to patients who do not develop POAF [16,17]. Additionally, affected patients typically experience a longer hospital course, with an average increase of up to two days in the ICU and up to three days in total hospital stay [18].

In the present study, the majority of POAF episodes occurred within the first four postoperative days, peaking on the second and third days. Similar findings were reported in the Afrodite study, a prospective multicenter cohort study evaluating AF recurrence after CABG, where arrhythmias most frequently occurred on the third and fourth postoperative days [19].

Advanced age is widely recognized as one of the strongest risk factors for the development of AF after open-heart surgery. A retrospective cohort study reported that patients who developed POAF were significantly older (70.6 ± 10.7 years) compared to those who did not (60.4 ± 16.4 years, p = 0.001) [20]. In our study, patients with POAF were also older (68.3 ± 8.6 vs. 66.3 ± 8.8 years), although the difference did not reach statistical significance. However, a statistically significant association was observed in patients who underwent MVR (p = 0.010). This finding is consistent with a study by Dokko et al. (2022), which found a higher incidence of POAF following mitral valve surgery compared to other cardiac procedures [21]. Another study reported POAF rates ranging from 14% to 42% following mitral valve surgery, with approximately 23% of patients developing POAF after MVR and 15% after mitral valve repair [22].

A retrospective case-control study involving 388 CABG patients at Townsville University Hospital found that increased cross-clamping time was associated with POAF [23]. In the present study, longer cross-clamping time was also associated with POAF (p = 0.016), although the association was not statistically significant. In contrast, a recent single-center prospective study (2023) found no significant association between cross-clamping time and POAF incidence [24].

A retrospective study conducted at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, showed that patients who developed POAF had a significantly lower ejection fraction (44.8%) compared to those without POAF (56.7%) (p = 0.001) [25]. The same study also reported that ICU stay, ventilation time, and total hospital stay were significantly longer in POAF patients. Similarly, our findings demonstrated statistically significant associations between POAF and lower ejection fraction (p < 0.012), prolonged mechanical ventilation (p = 0.008), and extended ICU stay (p < 0.001). Supporting this, a large multi-institutional study by Hawkins et al. in the southeastern United States, which included 27,307 cardiac surgery patients, also found an association between POAF and ICU length of stay [26]. Our multivariate analysis confirmed that patients who developed POAF were more likely to have undergone MVR and experienced longer ICU stays, with MVR associated with a 2.77-fold increased likelihood of developing POAF.

In our study, postoperative CRP levels were significantly elevated in patients who developed POAF (p < 0.001). This aligns with findings from a cross-sectional study of patients undergoing AVR, which reported significantly higher peak CRP levels in those who developed POAF [27]. These results support the hypothesis that inflammation plays a role in the development of POAF.

Renal function has also been implicated in POAF risk. A study by Limite et al. [28] found that a lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was associated with POAF in valve surgery patients. In our study, patients with elevated postoperative creatinine levels were more likely to develop POAF, although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.055).

Preoperative diuretic use has also been associated with POAF. A retrospective observational case-control study investigating predictors of new-onset POAF in off-pump CABG patients found that older age, higher baseline systolic blood pressure, preoperative diuretic use, blood transfusion, atrial dilation, and postoperative use of positive inotropic agents were all associated with increased risk of POAF [29].

Limitations

The main limitation of this study is the relatively small sample size. Additionally, data were collected from a single hospital, and diagnostic or monitoring practices, such as the use of electrocardiography or telemetry, may differ across institutions. Some brief or asymptomatic episodes of POAF may have gone undetected, particularly if they occurred outside of continuous monitoring periods.

Future implications

Further large-scale, multicenter studies are needed to improve the generalizability of findings and account for variations in clinical practice, including monitoring techniques and diagnostic protocols. Future research should also investigate the long-term impact of undiagnosed POAF on patient outcomes, with the aim of informing optimal screening and management strategies.

Conclusions

This study identified a significant association between POAF and both longer ICU stays and MVR. In addition, lower ejection fraction, longer cross-clamp duration, and extended ventilation time were found to be important factors that increase the risk of POAF following cardiac surgery.

Disclosures

Human subjects: Informed consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. The Scientific Council of the General Hospital of Athens ''Ippokrateio'' issued approval during its 70th extraordinary meeting, as recorded in the 13th decision dated August 23, 2018. Αfter the positive recommendation of the Research and Protocols Committee, chaired by Professor Mr. Ioannis Koskina, the Scientific Council unanimously approves the conduct of the research protocol of Ms. Marinas Katerini entitled "Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery".

Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Author Contributions

Concept and design:  Marina Katerini, Ioanna V. Papathanasiou, Lambrini Kourkouta, Konstantinos Koukourikos, Theodosios Paralikas, Maria Malliarou, Areti Tsaloglidou

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Marina Katerini, Ioanna V. Papathanasiou, Lambrini Kourkouta, Konstantinos Koukourikos, Theodosios Paralikas, Maria Malliarou, Areti Tsaloglidou

Drafting of the manuscript:  Marina Katerini, Ioanna V. Papathanasiou, Konstantinos Koukourikos, Theodosios Paralikas, Areti Tsaloglidou

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Marina Katerini, Lambrini Kourkouta, Maria Malliarou, Areti Tsaloglidou

Supervision:  Areti Tsaloglidou

References

  • 1.The evolution of cardiovascular surgery in elderly patient: a review of current options and outcomes. Nicolini F, Agostinelli A, Vezzani A, Manca T, Benassi F, Molardi A, Gherli T. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:736298. doi: 10.1155/2014/736298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.The management of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF): a systematic review. Meenashi Sundaram D, Vasavada AM, Ravindra C, Rengan V, Meenashi Sundaram P. Cureus. 2023;15:0. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after cardiac surgery: clinical practice review. Suero OR, Ali AK, Barron LR, Segar MW, Moon MR, Chatterjee S. J Thorac Dis. 2024;16:1503–1520. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-1626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.New-onset perioperative atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting and long-term risk of adverse events: an analysis from the CORONARY trial. Conen D, Wang MK, Devereaux PJ, et al. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10:0. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.020426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Biochemical predictors of new-onset atrial fibrillation after ascending aorta replacement surgery in acute type A aortic dissection patients. Shi J, Cheng YQ, Zhu XY, et al. J Card Surg. 2023;1:8. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Predicting atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a scoping review of associated factors and systematic review of existing prediction models. Fleet H, Pilcher D, Bellomo R, Coulson TG. Perfusion. 2023;38:92–108. doi: 10.1177/02676591211037025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Stroke prevention for patients with atrial fibrillation: beyond the guidelines. McIntyre WF, Healey J. J Atr Fibrillation. 2017;9:1475. doi: 10.4022/jafib.1475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Postoperative atrial fibrillation: a review. Shah S, Chahil V, Battisha A, Haq S, Kalra DK. Biomedicines. 2024;12:1968. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12091968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Postoperative atrial fibrillation: from mechanisms to treatment. Gaudino M, Di Franco A, Rong LQ, Piccini J, Mack M. Eur Heart J. 2023;44:1020–1039. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Clinical risk factors for postoperative atrial fibrillation among patients after cardiac surgery. Yamashita K, Hu N, Ranjan R, Selzman CH, Dosdall DJ. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;67:107–116. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1667065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Age-related association between sex and postoperative atrial fibrillation in non-cardiac surgery patients: observational cohort study. Oh AR, Kwon JH, Park J, Lee JH. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023;24:271. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2409271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.The persistent problem of new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation: a single-institution experience over two decades. Shen J, Lall S, Zheng V, Buckley P, Damiano RJ Jr, Schuessler RB. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;141:559–570. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.03.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Role of prophylactic magnesium supplementation in prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 20 randomized controlled trials. Chaudhary R, Garg J, Turagam M, et al. J Atr Fibrillation. 2019;12:2154. doi: 10.4022/jafib.2154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Preventive effect of preoperative vitamin D supplementation on postoperative atrial fibrillation. Cerit L, Özcem B, Cerit Z, Duygu H. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;33:347–352. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Post-operative atrial fibrillation: current treatments and etiologies for a persistent surgical complication. Lopes LA, Agrawal DK. J Surg Res (Houst) 2022;5:159–172. doi: 10.26502/jsr.10020209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Short-term and long-term risk of stroke in patients with perioperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Wang MK, Meyre PB, Heo R, et al. CJC Open. 2022;4:85–96. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2021.09.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eikelboom R, Sanjanwala R, Le ML, Yamashita MH, Arora RC. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021;111:544–554. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.05.104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Post-operative atrial fibrillation and risk of heart failure hospitalization. Goyal P, Kim M, Krishnan U, et al. Eur Heart J. 2022;43:2971–2980. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Atrial fibrillation post CABG and the risk of arrhythmia recurrence: the AFRODITE study. Nikolaou M, Pattakos G, Hitas C, et al. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2024 doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2024.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Overweight and aging increase the risk of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery independently of left atrial size and left ventricular ejection fraction. Stefàno PL, Bugetti M, Del Monaco G, et al. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020;15:316. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01366-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Incidence, etiology, and outcomes of pre- and post-operative atrial fibrillation in mitral valve procedures: a review. Dokko J, Novotny S, Santore LA, Shroyer AL, Bilfinger T. Vessel Plus. 2022;6:37. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.New-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation after mitral valve surgery: determinants and the effect on survival. Aggarwal R, Siems C, Potel KN, et al. JTCVS Open. 2023;16:305–320. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.08.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Predictors of atrial fibrillation post coronary artery bypass graft surgery: new scoring system. Lotter K, Yadav S, Saxena P, Vangaveti V, John B. Open Heart. 2023;10 doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2023-002284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Effect of aortic cross-clamping time on development of postoperative atrial fibrillation in isolated cabg: a single-center prospective clinical study. Dayi HI, Çalik ES, Birdal O, et al. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2023;38:0. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Factors influencing postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, single center experience. Ismail MF, El-Mahrouk AF, Hamouda TH, Radwan H, Haneef A, Jamjoom AA. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;12:40. doi: 10.1186/s13019-017-0609-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Postoperative atrial fibrillation is associated with increased resource utilization after cardiac surgery: a regional analysis of the Southeastern United States. Hawkins RB, Strobel RJ, Joseph M, Quader M, Teman NR, Almassi GH, Mehaffey JH. Vessel Plus. 2022;6:42–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.De novo atrial fibrillation following aortic valve replacement surgery is associated with decreased creatinine clearance and increased C-reactive protein levels: PS025. Fragão-Marques M, Saraiva F, Oliveira J, Lourenço AP, Leite-Moreira A, Falcão-Pires I. Porto Biomed J. 2017;2:189. doi: 10.1016/j.pbj.2017.07.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.The predictive role of renal function and systemic inflammation on the onset of de novo atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Limite LR, Magnoni M, Berteotti M, et al. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016;23:206–213. doi: 10.1177/2047487314564896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.New-onset post-operative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery − a retrospective case-control study. Cui X, Xu C, Chen C, Su Y, Li J, He X, Wang D. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2023;38:149–156. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES