Skip to main content
Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery logoLink to Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery
. 2025 Jul 20;27(7):1098612X251341769. doi: 10.1177/1098612X251341769

Standardized classification of synchronous gastrointestinal small cell lymphoma and gastrointestinal mast cell tumors in 15 cats

Ann E Hohenhaus 1,, Danielle Hudak 1, Taryn A Donovan 2, Christof A Bertram 3, Heather Daverio 2
PMCID: PMC12277675  PMID: 40685558

Abstract

Objectives

Synchronous primary tumors have been defined as two or more concurrent, yet independent tumors diagnosed within 6 months or less. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the occurrence and clinical findings in cats with synchronous gastrointestinal (GI) small cell lymphoma (SCL) and GI mast cell tumor (MCT) at two referral hospitals. A secondary objective was to classify these tumors as distinct or mixed, and if mixed, categorize them histomorphologically as collision or combined tumors based on standardized definitions informed by literature review.

Methods

The databases of the Schwarzman Animal Medical Center (AMC) and University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna, Austria (Vetmeduni) were searched between January 2012 and December 2022 for cats with synchronous GI SCL and GI MCT. Clinical findings, treatment and outcome were abstracted from medical records. Biopsy or autopsy reports and, when available, slides and/or histopathology images indicating the presence of a synchronous GI SCL and GI MCT were reviewed by two board-certified pathologists.

Results

A total of 15 cats were diagnosed with synchronous GI SCL and GI MCT, representing 4.3% of 329 cats with GI SCL in the AMC population. This study identified 15 cats with a total of 18 synchronous tumors. Six cats had tumors classified as distinct tumors and six as combined. Three cats had both distinct and combined tumors. Survival in this group of cats was in the range of 8–1189 days.

Conclusions and relevance

This is the first report to classify synchronous tumors in cats as distinct and combined tumors. The results of this study indicate a wide range of survival times for cats with synchronous GI SCL and GI MCT, suggesting that despite the diagnosis of synchronous tumors, the outcome is similar to cats with either GI SCL or GI MCT.

Keywords: Synchronous tumor, mixed tumor, distinct tumor, collision tumor, combined tumor, gastrointestinal mast cell tumor, histopathology, gastrointestinal lymphoma

Plain language summary

Fifteen cats diagnosed with intestinal small cell lymphoma and intestinal mast cell tumor at the same time

When two unrelated tumors occur within 6 months or less of one another, they are called synchronous tumors. This study investigated gastrointestinal (GI) small cell lymphoma (SCL) and GI mast cell tumor (MCT) occurring synchronously in cats. The tumors were classified as distinct if they were distant from each other and mixed if they occurred at the same site. A total of 15 cats with synchronous GI SCL and GI MCT were identified at two veterinary hospitals, Schwarzman Animal Medical Center (AMC) and University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna, Austria. Of the 329 cats in the AMC population with GI SCL, 4.3% were also diagnosed with a GI MCT. Six cats had distinct tumors and six cats had mixed tumors. Three cats had both distinct and mixed tumors. Seven cats survived more than 30 days after surgery (range 8–1189). Cats may have more than one type of tumor at the same time and multiple intestinal biopsies are required to identify these tumors. The results of this study suggest that the outcome in cats with synchronous GI SCLs and GI MCTs is similar to those with either one of these tumors despite the diagnosis of two tumors at the same time.

Introduction

Synchronous primary tumors have been defined in the veterinary and human literature as two or more concurrent, yet independent tumors diagnosed within 6 months or less of one another.15 Based on the human literature, metachronous tumors occur 6 months or more apart.25 Synchronous primary tumors can be further classified as distinct, meaning physically separate from one another, or mixed. The latter denotes a tumor appearing macroscopically as one mass, but when examined microscopically, contains two or more cell types.1,2,5 Histologic subtypes of mixed tumors have been defined in several human review papers and are based on geographic and physical interactions of the neoplastic cells and their presumed tumorigenesis.1,68 Mixed subtypes include collision, combined colonized or biphenotypic/biphasic tumors. The differences between subtypes can be minor and difficult to distinguish. 8 However, a lack of consensus in their use can result in these terms being used interchangeably, which is not ideal for reproducibility and comparisons between studies.1,79 Therefore, there is a need for well-defined histomorphologic criteria and standardized usage of terms in veterinary medicine that allow for reproducibility and comparison between studies.

In a large retrospective study of dogs with multiple distinct tumors, mast cell tumors (MCTs) were one of the most common tumor types occurring with another primary tumor. 10 Reported data from one veterinary diagnostic center identified mixed tumors encompassing MCTs and multiple other tumor types, including lymphoma. 1 A synchronous hepatosplenic lymphoma and visceral MCT was reported in a dog; however, the diagnosis of the visceral MCT was made on cytology alone and therefore further characterization of these tumors into synchronous tumor subtype(s) was not reported.10,11 Synchronous tumors have not been well documented in cats. A large retrospective study of 680 European shorthair cats found seven cats with multiple tumors, the most common being squamous cell carcinoma and mammary gland tumors. 12 The authors of that study did not indicate if the tumors were distinct or mixed. A second retrospective study of feline tumors identified 2.7% of cats with multiple primary tumors; however, the location of these tumors was not specified. 13 Laurenson et al 14 reported 4/14 cats with gastrointestinal (GI) MCTs having synchronous GI small cell lymphoma (SCL). Those authors did not report on the histomorphologic subtype or outcome in those cats. To our knowledge, there are no studies reporting on the occurrence, histomorphologic classification and outcome of cats diagnosed with synchronous GI SCL and GI MCT, which we have observed in our clinical practice.

Lymphoma is the most common feline neoplasm, with GI SCL accounting for 36–75% of all feline alimentary lymphoma.15,16 Lymphoma primarily affects the alimentary tract in older cats that test negative for feline leukemia virus (FeLV). 17 As GI SCL is a low-grade malignancy, treatment is less intense than for GI large cell lymphoma and long survival times are common.1820 GI MCTs affect the GI tract, spleen, liver and abdominal lymph nodes in cats.21,22 GI MCTs represent approximately 4–5% of feline intestinal tumors.12,13,23,24 Recent reports suggest survival times of 1–2 years can be achieved in cats with GI MCT.21,22

The primary objective of this study was to investigate the occurrence and clinical findings in cats with synchronous GI SCL and GI MCT at two referral hospitals. A secondary objective was to classify these tumors as distinct or mixed, and if mixed, categorize them histomorphologically as collision or combined tumors based on standardized definitions informed by literature review.

Materials and methods

The medical records and autopsy database of the AMC and the surgical biopsy and autopsy database at the Vetmeduni were retrospectively searched between January 2012 and December 2022 for cats with synchronous GI SCL and GI MCT. The date of study entry for all cats was defined as the date of diagnosis with synchronous GI SCL and GI MCT by histology. The end date was defined as the date of death (natural death or death by euthanasia) or the close of data collection if still alive on 31 December 2022. Data collected from the medical records, when available, included age, sex and neuter status, clinical signs, clinicopathologic testing, chemotherapeutic/treatment protocol(s), response to therapy and survival time.

Two board-certified (American College of Veterinary Pathologists) pathologists (TAD and HD) reviewed biopsy and autopsy reports for all cases and, where available, any histopathology images or slides. GI SCL was diagnosed using routine hematoxylin and eosin staining and, in some cases, molecular clonality testing (PCR for antigen receptor T-cell gamma locus rearrangement [PARR]) or immunohistochemistry (IHC) within the stomach, small intestine and/or large intestine. GI MCT was defined as documented MCT histopathology and, in some cases, IHC. The noteworthy histomorphologic features, as well as PARR and IHC findings (when available), were reviewed by each pathologist separately and each case was classified by the definition criteria summarized in Figure 1 and study objective 2. Pathologists were blinded to each other’s results during the review process. One discordant case was resolved via consensus review and discussion. Mixed tumor subtype definitions were based on previously reported definitions in human medicine.1,6,7 Collision tumors were defined as two or more distinct neoplastic populations that develop adjacent to one another, with no intermingling of the neoplastic cells at the border. Combined tumors were defined as two or more separate neoplastic populations that were intermingled either at the border or throughout the tumor. Distinct tumors represented two or more geographically separate tumors (ie, within separate segments of intestine).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Diagram highlighting the criteria for categorization of synchronous tumors. Synchronous tumors are defined as two or more tumors diagnosed within 6 months of one another and can be classified into mixed and distinct tumors. Mixed tumors include collision, combined and biphenotypic types of synchronous tumors: (a) collision tumor with two or more distinct neoplastic populations that are juxtaposed with no intermingling at their borders; (b) combined tumors with two or more separate neoplastic populations that are adjacent and intermixed; (c) biphenotypic tumors arise from a common stem cell precursor that undergoes divergent differentiation resulting in separate population phenotypes with overlapping immunohistochemical and molecular properties; and (d) distinct tumors with two or more geographically separated tumor populations

The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1) was used to assess response to treatment in patients that had abdominal imaging performed after surgery and during treatment. 25 If abdominal imaging was not performed after treatment, response was assessed by the clinician based on clinical signs and categorized as complete clinical response (100% resolution of clinical signs for ⩾30 days), partial clinical response (⩾50% but <100% resolution of clinical signs for ⩾30 days) or non-responder (<50% improvement of clinical signs or response of <30 days), based on previous recommendations. 18

Results

Epidemiology

A total of 329 cats with confirmed GI SCL were identified in the AMC databases. Of the cats in the AMC population, 14 also had a synchronous GI MCT. A 15th cat with synchronous GI SCL and GI MCT was identified at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna (Vetmeduni). The diagnosis of GI SCL was based on histopathology in all cats (Table 1). The cat from Vetmeduni and 4/14 cats from AMC were diagnosed with synchronous GI SCL and GI MCT at autopsy. Because there was no outcome information for the five cats diagnosed at autopsy, we report on signalment, anatomical tumor location and histological information from all 15 cats and clinical signs with treatment and outcome from 10 cats.

Table 1.

Diagnostic procedure and histopathology results by anatomic location in 15 cats with synchronous gastrointestinal (GI) small cell lymphoma (SCL) and GI mast cell tumor (MCT)

Cat Diagnostic procedure Small intestine Large intestine Liver Abdominal lymph node Other biopsies
1 Exploratory celiotomy
R&A
Full-thickness biopsies
SCL jejunum, duodenum, ileum MCT colon Mild lipidosis NSF None
2 Exploratory celiotomy
R&A
Full-thickness biopsies
SCL jejunum, colon MCT colon Chronic cholangitis, mild lipidosis MCT
Round cell infiltrate,
(PARR+)
None
3 Exploratory celiotomy
R&A
Full-thickness biopsies
SCL jejunum
MCT jejunum
Not biopsied Not biopsied MCT None
4 Exploratory celiotomy
R&A
Full-thickness biopsies
MCT jejunum
SCL jejunum
Not biopsied Hepatic adenoma MCT Exocrine pancreatic hyperplasia
5 Exploratory celiotomy
R&A
Full-thickness biopsies
SCL jejunum (PARR+)
MCT jejunum
Chronic LP jejunitis
Not biopsied Biliary cyst, LP neutrophilic periportal inflammation Reactive hyperplasia None
6 Exploratory celiotomy
R&A
Full-thickness biopsies
SCL jejunum (confirmed IHC CD3)
MCT jejunum (confirmed IHC c-kit)
Not biopsied Not biopsied Not biopsied None
7 Exploratory celiotomy
Full-thickness biopsies
SCL jejunum
MCT duodenum
Not biopsied Mild lipidosis MCT, eosinophilic lymphadenitis SCL stomach
8 Exploratory celiotomy
Full-thickness biopsies
SCL jejunum
MCT jejunum
Not biopsied MCT MCT None
9 Exploratory celiotomy
Full-thickness biopsies
SCL ileum (PARR+)
MCT jejunum
Mild LP eosinophilic enteritis duodenum
Not biopsied MCT MCT Stomach LP gastritis, possible MCT
Mammary gland adenoma
10 Exploratory celiotomy
Full-thickness biopsies Splenectomy
SCL jejunum
MCT jejunum
Not biopsied Not biopsied MCT MCT spleen
11 Autopsy SCL duodenum, jejunum, ileum
MCT jejunum
NSF Cystadenoma Reactive hyperplasia Cardiomyopathy
12 Autopsy SCL duodenum, jejunum
MCT jejunum
Not biopsied Moderate lymphocytic cholangitis Lymphoid hyperplasia Cardiomyopathy
13 Autopsy SCL duodenum, jejunum
MCT jejunum
LP colitis Vacuolar hepatopathy Lymphoid hyperplasia Hemoabdomen
14 Autopsy SCL segment not specified
MCT duodenum, jejunum
LP colitis LP cholangitis Plasmacytosis Pancreatitis
15 Autopsy SCL segment not specified MCT MCT SCL
MCT
SCL pancreas

IHC = immunohistochemistry; LP = lymphoplasmacytic; NSF = no significant findings; PARR+ = PCR for antigen receptor T cell gamma locus rearrangement positive; R&A = resection anastomosis

Clinical findings

The mean age of the 15 cats at the time of diagnosis was 12.2 years (range 5–17; median 13). This study population included one intact female, five castrated male and nine spayed female domestic shorthair cats.

Clinical signs at the time of diagnosis in cats with an ante-mortem diagnosis included vomiting (n = 4), diarrhea (n = 3), weight loss (n = 2) and inappetence (n = 1). Three of these cats experienced multiple clinical signs at the time of diagnosis. Four cats experienced no clinical signs. In these four cats, identification of synchronous GI SCL and GI MCT occurred incidentally during diagnostic investigations for other diseases, including chronic kidney disease (CKD), CKD with resistant urinary tract infections, hyperthyroidism, and inguinal masses and mammary gland tumors.

Several comorbidities were identified in the 10 cats at the time of diagnosis, including pancreatitis (n = 3), hyperthyroidism (n = 3), mammary gland tumor (n = 2), diabetes (n = 1), steroid responsive enteropathy/inflammatory bowel disease (n = 1), chronic food responsive enteropathy characterized by diarrhea (n = 1), recurrent urinary tract infections (n = 1) and cutaneous basal cell carcinoma (n = 1).

Preoperative hematology and biochemical profile results were available for all 10 cats with an ante-mortem diagnosis. The most common hematologic abnormality was monocytosis (n = 4). Other abnormalities included neutrophilia (n = 2) and anemia (n = 1). The most common biochemical profile abnormality was azotemia. Based on the International Renal Interest Society (IRIS) staging system, one cat was categorized with stage 1 CKD and seven cats were categorized with stage 2 CKD. Other abnormalities included hypokalemia (n = 2) and hypochloremia (n = 1).

Histopathology

This study identified 15 cats with a total of 18 synchronous GI MCTs and GI SCLs (Figure 1; Table 2). Six cats had tumors classified as distinct tumors and six as combined tumors. Three cats had both distinct and combined tumors (Table 2). One of the cats (cat 2), with distinct GI SCL in the jejunum and GI MCT in the colon, also had a possible collision tumor of GI SCL and GI MCT in the colon. PARR confirmed the presence of a clonal population of lymphocytes in the colon but histomorphometry was inconclusive and additional tissue was not available for further analysis; therefore, a definitive diagnosis of GI SCL in the colon could not be made. Immunohistochemistry for c-kit was used to identify one cat with GI MCT.

Table 2.

Classification of synchronous gastrointestinal (GI) small cell lymphoma (SCL) and GI mast cell tumor (MCT) in 15 cats

Synchronous tumor classification * SCL location MCT location
Distinct (Cat 1) Duodenum, jejunum, ileum Colon
Distinct (Cat 7 ) Jejunum Duodenum
Distinct (Cat 9 ) Ileum Jejunum
Distinct (Cat 14) Segment not specified Duodenum, jejunum
Distinct (Cat 15) Segment not specified Segment not specified
Distinct, possible collision tumor in colon (Cat 2) Jejunum, colon Colon
Combined (Cat 3 ) Jejunum Jejunum
Combined (Cat 4) Jejunum Jejunum
Combined (Cat 5) Jejunum Jejunum
Combined (Cat 6) Jejunum Jejunum
Combined (Cat 8) Jejumum Jejunum
Combined (Cat 10) Jejunum Jejunum
Combined and distinct (Cat 11) Jejunum, duodenum, ileum Jejunum
Combined and distinct (Cat 12) Jejunum, duodenum Jejunum
Combined and distinct (Cat 13) Jejunum, duodenum Jejunum
*

See ‘Materials and methods’ for a description of the classification scheme

Diagnosis based on histology report

Diagnosis based on review of histopathology images

Treatment and outcome

In total, 10 cats had an ante-mortem diagnosis of synchronous GI SCL and GI MCT. Four underwent exploratory celiotomy to obtain full-thickness GI biopsies and six cats had intestinal resection anastomosis as well as full-thickness biopsies. Three cats were humanely euthanized within 19 days postoperatively because of clinical decline and poor prognosis. One of those cats received steroid therapy.

In this group of 10 cats, survival was in the range of 8–1189 days (Table 3). Of the 10 cats with an ante-mortem diagnosis, seven survived longer than 30 days postoperatively, all of which were monitored on a regular basis by board-certified oncologists as was appropriate to their treatment protocol. One cat received no adjuvant treatment postoperatively and was still alive and well based on physical examination, laboratory evaluation and diagnostic imaging 466 days after diagnosis. Six cats received chemotherapy in addition to steroid therapy (Table 3).

Table 3.

Treatment and outcome in 10 cats diagnosed ante-mortem with synchronous gastrointestinal (GI) small cell lymphoma (SCL) and GI mast cell tumor (MCT)

Number of cats Days since surgery Treatment (see key for drugs administered) Response to treatment Necropsy Cause of death
Alive 3 731 1, 2 CR N/A N/A
466 No treatment CR N/A N/A
742 1, 5 CR N/A Lost to follow-up
Dead related to GI SCL or GI MCT 2 64 1, 3 PD Yes MCT
19 No treatment No Clinical decline postoperatively
Dead because of causes other than GI SCL or GI MCT 5 302 1, 4, 5 CR No Hypernatremia
1189 1, 2, 3 PR Yes Urothelial carcinoma
521 1, 2, 4 PD Yes Metastatic nasal carcinoma
8 No treatment No Neurologic event
18 No treatment No Uncontrolled diabetes

Treatment key: 1 = glucocorticoids; 2 = toceranib phosphate; 3 = vinblastine; 4 = cyclophosphamide; 5 = chlorambucil CR = complete response; N/A = not available; PD = progressive disease; PR = partial response

Response to treatment was available for all seven cats that lived longer than 30 days postoperatively. The median follow-up for the seven cats living longer than 30 days was 573 days (range 64–1189). One cat was alive and lost to follow-up at 742 days postoperatively. Table 3 summarizes the outcome in all 10 cats with an ante-mortem diagnosis.

Discussion

This study is the first to classify synchronous tumors in cats. The relatively high percentage (4.3%) of cats with synchronous GI SCLs and GI MCTs should be anticipated as GI SCL is the most common tumor identified in the GI tract. GI MCTs represent approximately 4–5% of feline intestinal tumors.12,13,23,24 In humans, interpretation of the data surrounding synchronous tumors is complicated by different definitions of synchronous with regard to anatomic location and time between development of the first and second tumors; despite those challenges, multiple primary tumors occur in 1.3–5.8% of human cancer patients. 26 We identified 18 synchronous tumors in 15 cats as some cats had both distinct and mixed tumors. Combined tumors and distinct tumors occurred with equal frequency in this group of cats, with six combined and six distinct tumors identified. In addition, one of the cats (cat 2), with distinct tumors in the jejunum and colon, also had a possible, but not confirmed, collision tumor of GI SCL and GI MCT in the colon (Table 2). Ancillary testing (PARR) of colonic samples identified a clonal population of lymphocytes in the colon. During review of the available microscopic samples from the colon, the histomorphologic features were not diagnostic for SCL. Thus, this case was designated as a possible collision tumor of the colon.

The predisposing factors for the development of synchronous tumors are unknown; however, several hypotheses have been proposed. 27 Growth factors, and possibly other factors, within the tumor microenvironment may help promote growth of a second tumor within the first. Synchronous tumors may develop in response to environmental carcinogens. In cats from Italy, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma was reported in 3/7 cats with synchronous basal cell carcinoma, unspecified sarcoma and a ceruminous gland adenoma. Those authors suggested exposure to ultraviolet light in outdoor cats as well as infection with Felis catus papillomavirus as possible environmental initiators and promotors.12,28 Whether environmental factors play a role in synchronous GI SCL and GI MCT remains to be determined. Synchronous tumors may develop from a common progenitor cell and differentiate along divergent lines due to a common underlying driver mutation. Support for this theory is lacking in GI SCL and GI MCT; mutations common to both tumor types have not been identified. 29 Both distinct and synchronous tumors can be driven by underlying genetic mutations that initiate tumorigenesis; for example, an underlying genetic cause has been identified in humans with multiple neuroendocrine neoplasia and has been speculated in small animals.10,3034

Risk factors for multiple primary tumors in humans include genetics, viral infection, smoking, betel quid chewing, and environmental or treatment-related factors. 26 We speculate the risk of synchronous tumors in cats is influenced by environmental factors, as has been suggested in humans; however, we currently lack information or evidence regarding this possibility. Finally, coincidental development of synchronous tumors may occur. This is a reasonable explanation in GI SCL and synchronous GI MCT since both are common GI tumors in cats.13,23,24

Because synchronous tumors are uncommon, there are no standard treatment protocols. To optimize treatment, an individualized treatment strategy will be required, taking into consideration histologic grade, tumor stage, prognostic markers and genetic mutations common to both tumors.5,35,36 Ideally, a treatment that is active against both tumors without increasing toxicity and decreasing survival can be found. In the case of the seven cats surviving longer than 30 days postoperatively and receiving treatment, the only treatment common to all seven was glucocorticoids. Glucocorticoids are frequently recommended treatments for both cancers.18,19,22 The variety of drugs administered and small number of cats make it impossible to assess the effect of other chemotherapeutic agents administered to cats with GI SCL and GI MCT; however, the wide range of survival times in these cats with synchronous tumors mirrors the wide range of survival times in cats diagnosed with only one of these two tumors.18,19,22 Five of the cats in this study died from causes other than synchronous GI SCL and GI MCT. This observation has been reported in studies of cats with only one of these tumors.20,22 The wide range of survival times and death from causes other than GI SCL and GI MCT when these tumors occur synchronously suggest the prognosis is similar to that for cats with only one of these tumors, as has been suggested in a study of dogs with mixed tumors. 1

The present study has some limitations. The retrospective nature of this study presented challenges because histopathology sections were not available for all cats. In addition, classification of the tumors from two cats were made based on the images accompanying the histopathology report. In only one was the classification based solely on the report itself. This was a cat with distinct tumors in the jejunum and duodenum where separation of collision and combined tumors would not have been required. In addition, the segments of the GI tract biopsied were not standardized and other categories of synchronous tumors may have gone unrecognized because all cats did not have comprehensive biopsies performed (GI tract, liver, spleen and lymph nodes). Because of this, the actual occurrence of synchronous GI SCL and GI MCT could be different from that calculated in this data set.

The authors recommend adoption and strict usage of standardized clear definitions for multiple primary tumors in veterinary medicine based on reports in human medicine29 to allow for reproducibility of data and comparison between studies (summarized in Figure 1). For these purposes, synchronous tumors were defined as two or more tumors diagnosed within 6 months of one another, including in the same biopsy. Therefore, given our inclusion criteria, all tumors reported here were synchronous. Metachronous tumors represent multiple tumors where additional tumor(s) are diagnosed more than 6 months from diagnosis of the first.25 Distinct tumors represent two or more separate tumor populations that are geographically separated (eg, within distinct and separate segments of the GI tract or within separate organs) (Figure 1d). Mixed tumors is a general term in which two or more neoplastic populations are intimately associated (either juxtaposed or intermingled) and include collision, combined, colonized and biphenotypic tumor subtypes. Mixed tumors can represent only benign processes, a combination of benign and malignant tumors, or only malignancies.2,6 Mixed tumors typically present clinically as a single nodule or mass; however, with microscopic review, two or more neoplastic populations are seen.2,5 Collison tumors are defined as two or more distinct neoplastic populations that are juxtaposed with no intermingling at their borders (Figure 1a).2,6,7,9 Combined tumors represent two or more separate neoplastic populations that are adjacent and intermixed (Figures 1b and 2).6,7 To facilitate reproducible separation between collision and combined tumor subtypes, the authors recommend strict adherence to the histomorphologic criteria for collision tumors defined by the absence of mixing between the two distinct neoplastic cell populations at their juxtaposed margins.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

A cat with synchronous small intestinal mast cell tumor (MCT) and small cell lymphoma (SCL) (combined tumor). (a) Subgross image shows the lighter-stained MCT in the mucosa (close to the lumen), submucosa (asterisk) and tunica muscularis (two asterisks) (hematoxylin and eosin [H&E]). (b) High magnification image showing intermingling of darker-stained, neoplastic small lymphocytes (top of image, arrow) and lighter-stained mast cells (bottom of image, asterisk) within the small intestinal lamina propria (H&E). Inset: higher magnification view of lymphocytes at the top of the image intermixed with mast cells at the bottom of the image

Conclusions

This is the first report to classify synchronous tumors in cats as either combined or distinct. Our findings support previous recommendations to biopsy multiple sites of the GI tract because disease is not uniformly distributed.5,37,38 To further characterize synchronous tumors in veterinary patients, multi-institutional studies with larger case numbers and standardized classification criteria are needed to allow meaningful comparisons across studies.

Footnotes

Accepted: 14 April 2025

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding: The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical approval: The work described in this manuscript involved the use of non-experimental (owned or unowned) animals. Established internationally recognized high standards (‘best practice’) of veterinary clinical care for the individual patient were always followed and/or this work involved the use of cadavers. Ethical approval from a committee was therefore not specifically required for publication in JFMS. Although not required, where ethical approval was still obtained, it is stated in the manuscript.

Informed consent: Informed consent (verbal or written) was obtained from the owner or legal custodian of all animal(s) described in this work (experimental or non-experimental animals, including cadavers, tissues and samples) for all procedure(s) undertaken (prospective or retrospective studies). No animals or people are identifiable within this publication, and therefore additional informed consent for publication was not required.

References

  • 1. Scott JE, Liptak JM, Powers BE. Malignant collision tumors in two dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2017; 251: 941–945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. van Tilburg L, van de Ven SEM, de Jonge PJF, et al. Endoscopic screening of the upper gastrointestinal tract for second primary tumors in patients with head and neck cancer in a Western country. Endoscopy 2023; 55: 981–990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Zhao Z, Sun K, Yan T, et al. Multiple primary tumors: a case report and review of the literature. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2020; 21: 394. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03426-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Zhou D, Han L, Jin C, et al. Clinical and genetic characteristics in lymphoma patients with a second solid malignancy. Front Oncol 2023; 13. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1152290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Kim SH, Park BS, Kim HS, et al. Synchronous quintuple primary gastrointestinal tract malignancies: case report. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23: 173–177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Bulte CA, Hoegler KM, Khachemoune A. Collision tumors: a review of their types, pathogenesis, and diagnostic challenges. Dermatol Ther 2020; 33. DOI: 10.1111/dth.14236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Satter EK, Metcalf J, Lountzis N, et al. Tumors composed of malignant epithelial and melanocytic populations: a case series and review of the literature. J Cutan Pathol 2009; 36: 211–219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Schizas D, Katsaros I, Michalinos A, et al. Collision tumors of the gastrointestinal tract: a systematic review of the literature. Anticancer Res 2018; 38: 6047–6057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Ciobanu D, Mesşinaӑ C, Streba L, et al. The role of immunohistochemistry in diagnosing a synchronous colon tumor. Rom J Morphol Embryol 2014; 55: 1209–1213. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Rebhun RB, Thamm DH. Multiple distinct malignancies in dogs: 53 cases. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2010; 46: 20–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Akiyoshi M, Hisasue M, Asakawa MG, et al. Hepatosplenic lymphoma and visceral mast cell tumor in the liver of a dog with synchronous and multiple primary tumors. Vet Clin Pathol 2022; 51: 414–421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Manuali E, Forte C, Vichi G, et al. Tumours in European Shorthair cats: a retrospective study of 680 cases. J Feline Med Surg 2020; 22: 1095–1102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Graf R, Grüntzig K, Boo G, et al. Swiss Feline Cancer Registry 1965–2008: the influence of sex, breed and age on tumour types and tumour locations. J Comp Pathol 2016; 154: 195–210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Laurenson MP, Skorupski KA, Moore PF, et al. Ultrasonography of intestinal mast cell tumors in the cat. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2011; 52: 330–334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Moore PF, Rodriguez-Bertos A, Kass PH. Feline gastrointestinal lymphoma: mucosal architecture, immunophenotype, and molecular clonality. Vet Pathol 2012; 49: 658–668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Pohlman LM, Higginbotham ML, Welles EG, et al. Immunophenotypic and histologic classification of 50 cases of feline gastrointestinal lymphoma. Vet Pathol 2009; 46: 259–268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Louwerens M, London CA, Pedersen NC, et al. Feline lymphoma in the post-feline leukemia virus era. J Vet Intern Med 2005; 19: 329–335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Kiselow MA, Rassnick KM, McDonough SP, et al. Outcome of cats with low-grade lymphocytic lymphoma: 41 cases (1995–2005). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2008; 232: 405–410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Stein TJ, Pellin M, Steinberg H, et al. Treatment of feline gastrointestinal small-cell lymphoma with chlorambucil and glucocorticoids. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2010; 46: 413–417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Pope KV, Tun AE, McNeill CJ, et al. Outcome and toxicity assessment of feline small cell lymphoma: 56 cases (2000–2010). Vet Med Sci 2015; 1: 51–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Evans BJ, O’Brien D, Allstadt SD, et al. Treatment outcomes and prognostic factors of feline splenic mast cell tumors: a multi-institutional retrospective study of 64 cases. Vet Comp Oncol 2018; 16: 20–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Barrett LE, Skorupski K, Brown DC, et al. Outcome following treatment of feline gastrointestinal mast cell tumours. Vet Comp Oncol 2018; 16: 188–193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Kehl A, Törner K, Jordan A, et al. Pathological findings in gastrointestinal neoplasms and polyps in 860 cats and a pilot study on miRNA analyses. Vet Sci 2022; 9. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci9090477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Rissetto K, Villamil JA, Selting KA, et al. Recent trends in feline intestinal neoplasia: an epidemiologic study of 1,129 cases in the veterinary medical database from 1964 to 2004. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2011; 47: 28–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Nguyen SM, Thamm DH, Vail DM, et al. Response evaluation criteria for solid tumours in dogs (v1.0): a Veterinary Cooperative Oncology Group (VCOG) consensus document. Vet Comp Oncol 2015; 13: 176–183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Pan SY, Huang CP, Chen WC. Synchronous/metachronous multiple primary malignancies: review of associated risk factors. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12081940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Dinehart M, Abate MS, Jennings T, et al. Colliding, colonizing or combining? Four cases illustrating the unique challenges presented by melanoma arising in conjunction with basal cell carcinoma. J Cutan Pathol 2018; 45: 443–452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Hoggard N, Munday JS, Luff J. Localization of Felis catus papillomavirus type 2 E6 and E7 RNA in feline cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Vet Pathol 2018; 55: 409–416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Ludwig L, Dobromylskyj M, Wood GA, et al. Feline oncogenomics: what do we know about the genetics of cancer in domestic cats? Vet Sci 2022; 9. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci9100547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Beatrice L, Boretti FS, Sieber-Ruckstuhl NS, et al. Concurrent endocrine neoplasias in dogs and cats: a retrospective study (2004–2014). Vet Rec 2018; 182: 323. DOI: 10.1136/vr.104199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Lurye JC, Behrend EN. Endocrine tumors. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2001; 31: 1083–1110, ix–x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. McDonnell JE, Gild ML, Clifton-Bligh RJ, et al. Multiple endocrine neoplasia: an update. Intern Med J 2019; 49: 954–961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Proverbio D, Spada E, Perego R, et al. Potential variant of multiple endocrine neoplasia in a dog. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2012; 48: 132–138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Roccabianca P, Rondena M, Paltrinieri S, et al. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type-I-like syndrome in two cats. Vet Pathol 2006; 43: 345–352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Vogt A, Schmid S, Heinimann K, et al. Multiple primary tumours: challenges and approaches, a review. ESMO Open 2017; 2. DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Rosşu GA, Furaӑu GO, Ionescu CA, et al. A rare case of synchronous ovarian tumors: clinical case report and literature review. Rom J Morphol Embryol 2019; 60: 1365–1370. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Evans SE, Bonczynski JJ, Broussard JD, et al. Comparison of endoscopic and full-thickness biopsy specimens for diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease and alimentary tract lymphoma in cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2006; 229: 1447–1450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Kleinschmidt S, Harder J, Nolte I, et al. Chronic inflammatory and non-inflammatory diseases of the gastrointestinal tract in cats: diagnostic advantages of full-thickness intestinal and extraintestinal biopsies. J Feline Med Surg 2010; 12: 97–103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES