Skip to main content
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1997 Dec 1;157(11):1529–1535.

Alcohol disorders in Canada as indicated by the CAGE questionnaire

C Poulin 1, I Webster 1, E Single 1
PMCID: PMC1228563  PMID: 9400407

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe alcohol disorders in the general Canadian population, using as a standard indicator the CAGE questionnaire (Have you felt you needed to cut down on your drinking? Have you felt annoyed by criticism of your drinking? Have you felt guilty about drinking? Have you felt you needed a drink first thing in the morning [eye-opener]?). DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data from Canada's Alcohol and Other Drugs Survey (CADS), a national telephone survey conducted in 1994 of a representative sample of 12,155 people aged 15 years or more. PARTICIPANTS: The CAGE questionnaire was administered to 5894 drinkers who had consumed alcohol in the 12 months before the CADS survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Respondents with positive (2 or more affirmative responses) and negative results on the CAGE questionnaire were compared as to demographic characteristics, alcohol consumption and harmful consequences of their drinking. Independent predictors of a positive result were identified by means of logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 5.8% of CAGE-tested current drinkers had a positive result on the past-year CAGE in 1994. The proportion of respondents reporting alcohol-related problems in one or more areas of their life was 7 times greater among drinkers with a positive result on the CAGE questionnaire than among those with a negative result (66.8% v. 9.5%) (p < 0.0001). When all demographic characteristics were controlled for simultaneously, male sex, residence in the Atlantic provinces, Quebec or the Prairies, single/never married or divorced/separated marital status, and low education level were found to be independent risk factors for a positive result on the CAGE questionnaire. About 85% of the respondents with a positive result had not sought help for their drinking. Applying the estimated sensitivity and specificity of the CAGE questionnaire in detecting alcohol dependence, as per criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, in a general US population, the authors estimated that 4.1% of Canadians had an alcohol dependence in 1994. CONCLUSION: The large proportion of current drinkers with a positive result on the CAGE questionnaire who did not seek help for their drinking underscores the need for identification and brief interventions by physicians. Further research is needed to elucidate the underlying reasons for regional differences in CAGE status.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (119.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bernadt M. W., Mumford J., Taylor C., Smith B., Murray R. M. Comparison of questionnaire and laboratory tests in the detection of excessive drinking and alcoholism. Lancet. 1982 Feb 6;1(8267):325–328. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(82)91579-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bush B., Shaw S., Cleary P., Delbanco T. L., Aronson M. D. Screening for alcohol abuse using the CAGE questionnaire. Am J Med. 1987 Feb;82(2):231–235. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(87)90061-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chan A. W., Pristach E. A., Welte J. W. Detection by the CAGE of alcoholism or heavy drinking in primary care outpatients and the general population. J Subst Abuse. 1994;6(2):123–135. doi: 10.1016/s0899-3289(94)90157-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cherpitel C. J. Analysis of cut points for screening instruments for alcohol problems in the emergency room. J Stud Alcohol. 1995 Nov;56(6):695–700. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1995.56.695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Crum R. M., Helzer J. E., Anthony J. C. Level of education and alcohol abuse and dependence in adulthood: a further inquiry. Am J Public Health. 1993 Jun;83(6):830–837. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.6.830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ewing J. A. Detecting alcoholism. The CAGE questionnaire. JAMA. 1984 Oct 12;252(14):1905–1907. doi: 10.1001/jama.252.14.1905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. JELLINEK E. M., KELLER M. Rates of alcoholism in the United States of America, 1940-1948. Q J Stud Alcohol. 1952 Mar;13(1):49–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. King M. At risk drinking among general practice attenders: validation of the CAGE questionnaire. Psychol Med. 1986 Feb;16(1):213–217. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700002658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mayfield D., McLeod G., Hall P. The CAGE questionnaire: validation of a new alcoholism screening instrument. Am J Psychiatry. 1974 Oct;131(10):1121–1123. doi: 10.1176/ajp.131.10.1121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Nyström M., Peräsalo J., Salaspuro M. Screening for heavy drinking and alcohol-related problems in young university students: the CAGE, the Mm-MAST and the trauma score questionnaires. J Stud Alcohol. 1993 Sep;54(5):528–533. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1993.54.528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rush B., Bass M., Stewart M., McCracken E., Labreque M., Bondy S. Detecting, preventing, and managing patients' alcohol problems. Can Fam Physician. 1994 Sep;40:1557–1566. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rydon P., Redman S., Sanson-Fisher R. W., Reid A. L. Detection of alcohol-related problems in general practice. J Stud Alcohol. 1992 May;53(3):197–202. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1992.53.197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Single E. W., Brewster J. M., MacNeil P., Hatcher J., Trainor C. The 1993 General Social Survey II: alcohol problems in Canada. Can J Public Health. 1995 Nov-Dec;86(6):402–407. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Smart R. G., Adlaf E. M., Knoke D. Use of the CAGE scale in a population survey of drinking. J Stud Alcohol. 1991 Nov;52(6):593–596. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1991.52.593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sobell L. C., Cunningham J. A., Sobell M. B. Recovery from alcohol problems with and without treatment: prevalence in two population surveys. Am J Public Health. 1996 Jul;86(7):966–972. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.7.966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES