Skip to main content
NCBI home page
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1998 Jan 13;158(1):41–46.

Chlamydial cervicitis: testing the practice guidelines for presumptive diagnosis

J Sellors 1, M Howard 1, L Pickard 1, D Jang 1, J Mahony 1, M Chernesky 1
PMCID: PMC1228739  PMID: 9475908

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the recommendation from the Canadian guidelines for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) that mucopurulent endocervical discharge and 10 or more polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) per high-power field of a Gram-stained endocervical smear or, when Gram staining is not possible, the presence of endocervical discharge and one of edema, erythema or induced mucosal bleeding of the cervix can be considered diagnostic for chlamydial cervicitis. METHODS: A total of 596 consecutive women attending 2 family planning clinics for routine care underwent vaginal speculum examination and were tested for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. PMN counts from Gram-stained endocervical smears and the presence or absence of putative indicators of chlamydial infection were recorded. RESULTS: The prevalence of chlamydial cervicitis was 6.2% (37/596), and no women tested positive for N. gonorrhoeae. Presumptive diagnosis of chlamydial cervicitis based on the guidelines criteria of mucopurulent endocervical discharge and 10 or more PMN per high-power microscopic field had a sensitivity and specificity of 18.9% and 97.0% respectively, a positive predictive value of 29.2% and a positive likelihood ratio (LR) of 6.2 (p = 0.003). Presumptive diagnosis based on endocervical discharge with edema, erythema or induced mucosal bleeding of the cervix had a sensitivity and specificity of 43.2% and 80.0% respectively, a positive predictive value of 12.5% and a positive LR of 2.2 (p = 0.002). In the presence of bacterial vaginosis or vaginitis, the LR for the criteria of mucopurulent endocervical discharge and 10 or more PMN per high-power field was 5.4 (p = 0.04), whereas the LR was 4.3 (p = 0.10) if bacterial vaginosis and vaginitis were absent. CONCLUSIONS: In this setting, the practice of making a presumptive diagnosis of chlamydial cervicitis on the basis of the criteria given in the Canadian STD guidelines was not supported.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (119.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brunham R. C., Binns B., Guijon F., Danforth D., Kosseim M. L., Rand F., McDowell J., Rayner E. Etiology and outcome of acute pelvic inflammatory disease. J Infect Dis. 1988 Sep;158(3):510–517. doi: 10.1093/infdis/158.3.510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brunham R. C., Maclean I. W., Binns B., Peeling R. W. Chlamydia trachomatis: its role in tubal infertility. J Infect Dis. 1985 Dec;152(6):1275–1282. doi: 10.1093/infdis/152.6.1275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brunham R. C., Paavonen J., Stevens C. E., Kiviat N., Kuo C. C., Critchlow C. W., Holmes K. K. Mucopurulent cervicitis--the ignored counterpart in women of urethritis in men. N Engl J Med. 1984 Jul 5;311(1):1–6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198407053110101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Davies H. D., Wang E. E. Periodic health examination, 1996 update: 2. Screening for chlamydial infections. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. CMAJ. 1996 Jun 1;154(11):1631–1644. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Forbes B. A., Bartholoma N., McMillan J., Roefaro M., Weiner L., Welych L. Evaluation of a monoclonal antibody test to detect chlamydia in cervical and urethral specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Jun;23(6):1136–1137. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.6.1136-1137.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Haddix A. C., Hillis S. D., Kassler W. J. The cost effectiveness of azithromycin for Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women. Sex Transm Dis. 1995 Sep-Oct;22(5):274–280. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199509000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hall C. J., Nelder C. Comparison of three non-culture techniques for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital tract specimens. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989 Oct;8(10):866–870. doi: 10.1007/BF01963772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Harrison H. R., Costin M., Meder J. B., Bownds L. M., Sim D. A., Lewis M., Alexander E. R. Cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection in university women: relationship to history, contraception, ectopy, and cervicitis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Oct 1;153(3):244–251. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(85)80105-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hayward R. S., Laupacis A. Initiating, conducting and maintaining guidelines development programs. CMAJ. 1993 Feb 15;148(4):507–512. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Johnson B. A., Poses R. M., Fortner C. A., Meier F. A., Dalton H. P. Derivation and validation of a clinical diagnostic model for chlamydial cervical infection in university women. JAMA. 1990 Dec 26;264(24):3161–3165. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Massé R., Laperrière H., Rousseau H., Lefebvre J., Remis R. S. Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infection: prevalence and determinants among women presenting for routine gynecologic examination. CMAJ. 1991 Oct 15;145(8):953–961. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Moscicki B., Shafer M. A., Millstein S. G., Irwin C. E., Jr, Schachter J. The use and limitations of endocervical Gram stains and mucopurulent cervicitis as predictors for Chlamydia trachomatis in female adolescents. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Jul;157(1):65–71. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(87)80347-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nugent R. P., Hillier S. L. Mucopurulent cervicitis as a predictor of chlamydial infection and adverse pregnancy outcome. The Investigators of the Johns Hopkins Study of Cervicitis and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome. Sex Transm Dis. 1992 Jul-Aug;19(4):198–202. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199207000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Scheel O., Anestad G., Mundal R., Berdal B. P. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in the urine of young Norwegian males by enzyme immunoassay. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1993 Oct;12(10):746–749. doi: 10.1007/BF02098461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Scholes D., Stergachis A., Heidrich F. E., Andrilla H., Holmes K. K., Stamm W. E. Prevention of pelvic inflammatory disease by screening for cervical chlamydial infection. N Engl J Med. 1996 May 23;334(21):1362–1366. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199605233342103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sellors J. W., Mahony J. B., Chernesky M. A., Rath D. J. Tubal factor infertility: an association with prior chlamydial infection and asymptomatic salpingitis. Fertil Steril. 1988 Mar;49(3):451–457. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59772-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sellors J. W., Mahony J. B., Jang D., Pickard L., Goldsmith C. H., Gafni A., Chernesky M. A. Comparison of cervical, urethral, and urine specimens for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women. J Infect Dis. 1991 Jul;164(1):205–208. doi: 10.1093/infdis/164.1.205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sellors J. W., Pickard L., Gafni A., Goldsmith C. H., Jang D., Mahony J. B., Chernesky M. A. Effectiveness and efficiency of selective vs universal screening for chlamydial infection in sexually active young women. Arch Intern Med. 1992 Sep;152(9):1837–1844. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Spence M. R., Hollander D. H., Smith J., McCaig L., Sewell D., Brockman M. The clinical and laboratory diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis infection. Sex Transm Dis. 1980 Oct-Dec;7(4):168–171. doi: 10.1097/00007435-198010000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Spiegel C. A., Amsel R., Holmes K. K. Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis by direct gram stain of vaginal fluid. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Jul;18(1):170–177. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.1.170-177.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Weström L. Influence of sexually transmitted diseases on sterility and ectopic pregnancy. Acta Eur Fertil. 1985 Jan-Feb;16(1):21–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES