Abstract
Clinical vignette:
Leigh syndrome (LS) and Leigh-like syndromes (LLS), now collectively referred to as Leigh Syndrome Spectrum (LSS), encompass a wide range of clinical manifestations, including epilepsy, neurodevelopmental delay, and movement disorders such as ataxia, chorea, and dystonia. Although rare, LSS can present atypical symptoms in certain cases. The primary etiological cause of LSS is genetic, resulting from mitochondrial alterations.
Clinical dilemma:
Hyperkinesias in LSS or other mitochondrial disorders can be disabling, leading to a significant reduction in the patient’s quality of life.
Clinical solution:
Globus pallidum deep brain stimulation (GPi-DBS) surgery is an effective treatment for hyperkinesias, such as chorea, and dystonia, caused by mitochondrial defects.
Gap in knowledge:
Pathogenic DNM1-related mitochondrial disorders with Leigh syndrome phenotype may show long-term improvement of hyperkinetic movements after GPi-DBS.
Keywords: Leigh Syndrome, Leigh-like syndrome, Dynamin 1, Mitofusin 2, Hyperkinesias, Deep brain stimulation
Leigh syndrome spectrum (LSS) is characterized by significant clinical and genetic heterogeneity. Despite advances in understanding the etiology and pathophysiology of LSS, its geno-phenotypic spectrum is continuously evolving. GPi-DBS may lead to sustained long-term improvement of hyperkinetic movement disorders in patients with LSS caused by pathogenic DNM1 variants. Somehow, drug-resistant epileptic seizures that were part of the clinical spectrum, were also controlled as well.
Methods
A 33-year-old right-handed woman from a non-consanguineous family presented with drug-resistant epilepsy, generalized dystonia, and neurodevelopmental regression. Generalized tonic-clonic seizures began at age 5 with a frequency of 5–10 episodes per week. The patient showed no perinatal or neurodevelopmental abnormalities until the age of 13, when she began to exhibit gait disturbances due to incoordination, accompanied by lightning-like jerks of the limbs. At the same time, neurodevelopmental regression and the insidious onset of sensorineural hearing loss were noted. At the age of 26, her family observed generalized abnormal postures. Prior to evaluation at our clinic the patient had been managed by pediatric neurology with a diagnosis of drug-resistant epilepsy. An etiological workup was not undertaken, and the patient received multiple antiepileptic drugs, either as monotherapy or in combination, with limited clinical benefit. The patient’s mother had recently died of endometrial cancer; however, she was otherwise not known to have any other medical conditions. The father denied any history of illness at the time of evaluation, and his medical assessment revealed no pathological findings. Initial evaluation revealed multiple non-motor symptoms including apathy, anxiety, inattention, hyperhidrosis, nocturia, and insomnia, all of which began during adolescence. Neurological examination showed a low IQ (see Table A), limited upward gaze, and generalized dystonia involving the trunk and upper limbs, along with an ataxic gait (see Video, part 1). No other neurological deficits were seen. Electroencephalogram displayed generalized spike and wave activity. Nerve conduction studies depicted axonal sensory polyneuropathy. Brain magnetic resonance image (MRI) showed brain and cerebellar atrophy with striatal hyperintensities at FLAIR/T2 sequence (see Figure 1). Whole exome sequencing exhibited a pathogenic heterozygous variant at the Mitochondrial Ribosomal Protein of the Small subunit 34 (MRPS34) gene [NM_001300900.1:c.94C>T p.(Gln32*) exon 1]. Whole genome sequencing depicted a heterozygous pathogenic variant at the Dynamin 1 (DNM1) gene [NM_004408.3:c.824C>T (p.Pro275Leu) exon 6], as well as a heterozygous unknown significance variant at the Mitofusin 2 (MFN2) gene [NM_014874.3:c.1574A>G (p.Asn525Ser) exon 15]. Mitochondrial DNA analysis plus MLPA testing was negative for other variants. Genetic testing on both parents depicted the MRPS34 gene variant in the father only. Further clinical workout did not show further abnormalities, including normal blood lactate levels (1.2 mmol/l, normal values from 0.7 to 2.6 mmol/l). Coenzyme Q10 up to 1200 mg daily showed no improvement. Levetiracetam 1 g TID mildly improved seizures. Bilateral GPi-DBS was performed by the age of 31 (see Figure 2). Both the patient and care providers reported a moderate reduction in dyskinesia amplitude prior to the initiation of stimulation due to lesional effect. Stimulation was initiated in both GPi electrodes two days post-implantation. Bilateral bipolar stimulation (–0 +2) was programmed with an amplitude of 4.5 V, a pulse width of 60 microseconds, and a frequency of 185 Hz. According to the Burke-Fahn-Marsden dystonia motor scale, the patient’s scores were 33.5 preoperatively, 21 at three months, 28.5 at one year, and 12.5 more than two years after bilateral GPi-DBS, improving movement disorders and epilepsy as well (see Table B; Video parts 2 and 3). The subject has been seizure-free since then. It seems that cognitive performance has not worsened after surgery, and dystonia has been under control for more than 2 years after placement of GPi DBS (see Video part 4). Current stimulation parameters are: left side –0 +2, 5 V, 60 microseconds, 185 Hz; right side –0 +2, 4.5 V, 60 microseconds, 185 Hz.
Table A.
Comparative performance in neuropsychological assessment on April 2019, October 2019 and June 2020. WAIS-IV Wechsler Adult Intelligence Test; IQ Intellectual quotient; HVLT-R Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised; ROCF Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure. *Trail Making Test score reported in seconds. B. Clinical Manifestations and Brain MRI Changes Reported in Pathogenic Variants in DNM1.
| |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A) | PRE-SURGICAL ASSESSMENT | POST-SURGICAL ASSESSMENT 1 | POST-SURGICAL ASSESSMENT 2 | ||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
RAW SCORE | PERCENTILE SCORE | QUALITATIVE DESCRIPTION | RAW SCORE | PERCENTILE SCORE | QUALITATIVE DESCRIPTION | RAW SCORE | PERCENTILE SCORE | QUALITATIVE DESCRIPTION | |
| |||||||||
Intelligence (WAIS-IV) | |||||||||
| |||||||||
Full scale IQ | 47 | <0.1 | Deficient – moderate | 51 | 0.1 | Deficient – moderate | 48 | <0.1 | Deficient – moderate |
| |||||||||
Verbal comprehension | 50 | <0.1 | Deficient – moderate | 56 | 0.2 | Deficient – mild | 53 | 0.1 | Deficient – moderate |
| |||||||||
Perceptual reasoning | 50 | <0.1 | Deficient – moderate | 56 | 0.2 | Deficient – mild | 54 | 0.1 | Deficient – moderate |
| |||||||||
Working memory | 52 | 0.1 | Deficient – moderate | 52 | 0.1 | Deficient – moderate | 49 | 0.1 | Deficient – moderate |
| |||||||||
Processing speed | 55 | 0.1 | Deficient – mild | 55 | 0.1 | Deficient – mild | 50 | 0.1 | Deficient – moderate |
| |||||||||
Language | |||||||||
| |||||||||
Boston Denomination Test | 17 | <5 | Deficient | 24 | <5 | Deficient | 24 | <5 | Deficient |
| |||||||||
Token Test (verbal comprehension) | 15 | – | Moderate impairment | 20 | – | Moderate impairment | 19.5 | – | Moderate impairment |
| |||||||||
Verbal fluency (animals) | 1 | <5 | Deficient | 2 | <5 | Deficient | 2 | <5 | Deficient |
| |||||||||
Verbal fluency (letter A) | 1 | <5 | Deficient | 2 | <5 | Deficient | 2 | <5 | Deficient |
| |||||||||
Attention | |||||||||
| |||||||||
Trail Making Test – A* | 187 | <5 | Deficient | 300 | <5 | Deficient | 258 | <5 | Deficient |
| |||||||||
Memory | |||||||||
| |||||||||
HVLT-R word list total learning | 10 | <5 | Deficient | 14 | <5 | Deficient | 10 | <5 | Deficient |
| |||||||||
HVLT-R word list free recall | 3 | <5 | Deficient | 5 | 5-10 | Borderline | 4 | <5 | Deficient |
| |||||||||
ROCF recall | 2 | <5 | Deficient | 2 | <5 | Deficient | 4 | <5 | Deficient |
| |||||||||
Visuospatial skills | |||||||||
| |||||||||
ROCF copy | 2.5 | <5 | Deficient | 4 | <5 | Deficient | 7 | <5 | Deficient |
| |||||||||
Clinical Spectrum Reported in Pathogenic Variants in DNM1 | |||||||||
| |||||||||
B) | DNM1 | ||||||||
| |||||||||
Age of Onset | Infancy/Early Childhood | ||||||||
| |||||||||
Clinical Manifestations | Epileptic Encephalopathy, Neurodevelopmental delay and/or Intellectual Disability, Hypotonia, Spasticity, Myoclonus, Dystonia, Choreoathetosic Movements | ||||||||
| |||||||||
Brain MRI Abnormalities | Cerebral volume loss over time, Delayed myelinations, Thin Corpus Callosum [16] | ||||||||
|
Video.
Generalized dystonia with axial involvement, as well as incoordination and ataxia are seen in the patient. Bilateral GPi-DBS was performed, showing improvement in movement disorders since the third month after surgery. Improvement in movement disorders and epilepsy has been maintained for more than 2 years after surgical treatment.
Figure 1.
Brain MRI showing generalized atrophy and striatal hyperintensities (A), cerebellar atrophy and a widened fourth ventricle (B) and thinning of corpus callosum (C). Hippocampal atrophy and structural changes commonly seen in tauopathies are also seen (D).
Figure 2.
A 3-moths postoperative CT was co-registered with a T2 sequence preoperative MRI (StealthStation 7, Cranial stereotactic software, Medtronic). Coronal (a), axial (b), and probe’s eye (c) views of the definitive location of the DBS electrodes, (d) shows a parallel reconstruction of the right DBS electrode (Medtronic 3389). The tips of both electrodes were located in the posterolateral region of the ventral GPi, close to the interpallidal lamina. The definitive location coordinates of the electrodes were as follows: rGPi X = 24.7 mm, Y = 1.4 mm, Z = –0.8 mm; lGPi X = 24.5 mm, Y = 1.4 mm, Z = –0.3 mm.
Discussion
The clinical spectrum now recognized as LSS was first described in 1951 by Denis Leigh [1]. Original description documented the case of a seven-month-old infant presenting with subacute optic atrophy, deafness, global spasticity, extensor plantar responses, rapid progression to coma, and subsequent death. Histopathological examination revealed lesions primarily located in the thalamus, midbrain, pons, and spinal cord, characterized by significant vascular proliferation and gliosis zones in these regions [1].
Currently, LS is known to result from alterations in the mitochondrial respiratory chain, predominantly affecting respiratory complexes I and IV [2], with characteristic histological [1,3] and biochemical changes such as elevated serum lactate levels [2]. Advances in genetic studies have identified multiple causative genes for LS and LLS [2,4,5,6]. Clinically, LSS demonstrates significant heterogeneity in its presentation. However, LS typically manifests with neurodevelopmental delay or intellectual disability, hypotonia and weakness, respiratory dysfunction, epilepsy, and feeding difficulties [7]. Other reported features include movement disorders such as ataxia and dystonia and ophthalmological abnormalities like nystagmus and optic atrophy [8]. The disease can be subclassified based on symptom onset into early-onset syndrome (≤ 2 years) or late-onset (> 2 years) [9], or into typical or atypical syndromes [10], respectively. It is noteworthy that unconventional (atypical) presentations have been characterized by flaccid paralysis, progressive diplegia, central apnea and respiratory arrest, and epilepsy as initial symptoms of the syndrome [10]. Despite advancements in LSS research since its description over 70 years ago, globally accepted diagnostic criteria remain unavailable despite efforts made by Rahman et al. in 1996 [11].
While LS is primarily caused by defects in oxidative phosphorylation, alterations in genes involved in mitochondrial dynamics—such as DNM1—can also result in LS or LLS, now referred as LSS [5]. DNM1 variants have been linked not only to developmental and epileptic encephalopathies [12] or synaptic vesicle cycling disorders [13], but also to the LSS, as reported by several authors [2,5,6,11,14].
DNM1 interacts with other molecules like clathrin and plays a crucial role in neuronal endocytosis. Exclusively located within the central nervous system, it serves an essential function in vesicular fission during endocytosis. Mutations in DNM1 disrupt vesicular trafficking homeostasis and regulation of receptor/protein expression on the plasma membrane [15].
The clinical spectrum associated with pathogenic variants in DNM1 has been previously described [16], encompassing multiple typical manifestations with early onset (< 1 year), such as epilepsy, neurodevelopmental delay/arrest/regression, visual disturbances, movement disorders including choreoathetosis, dystonia and spasticity, and facial dysmorphism. However, atypical phenotypes have also been reported including absence of epilepsy or myoclonic jerks unrelated to epileptic activity.
The characteristic clinical phenotype of DNM1 is largely attributable to mutations in its GTPase domain [16]. DNM1 comprises five domains [15], with different clinical manifestations depending on the affected domain. Brereton et al. [17] reported the first case involving a pathogenic variant within DNM1 PH domain in a patient with neurodevelopmental delay without epilepsy. In turn, although most pathogenic variants are expressed in a heterozygous state, Yigit et al. [12] demonstrated that, on occasion, a biallelic state can lead to the disease. This highlights that clinical manifestations associated with pathogenic variants in DNM1 are highly heterogeneous depending not only on allelic status but also on affected protein domains.
Although no universally accepted diagnostic criteria exist for the LSS, this case supports a LLS associated with a pathogenic DNM1 variant, characterized by mild-neurodevelopmental regression, epilepsy, sensorineural hearing loss, generalized dystonia, ataxic gait, and bilateral basal ganglia hyperintensities on MRI, in the absence of elevated serum lactate levels or response to coenzyme Q treatment [6,11,18]. The c.824C>T variant in the DNM1 gene results in the p.Pro275Leu amino acid substitution and has been classified as likely pathogenic with moderate evidence according to the VarSome and Franklin databases. It exhibits an extremely low population allele frequency. To date, this variant has not been previously associated with LLS, making this case the first clinical description within the LSS.
The mutation in the GTPase domain of DNM1 alone could account for moderate neurodevelopmental delay (see Table A), epileptic seizures, and dystonia (see Video part 1). Interestingly, while neurodevelopmental delay in these subjects is typically severe, there are reports of atypical cases with mild to moderate neurodevelopmental delay caused by pathogenic variants in the GTPase domain, as observed in our case [19]. It is worth noting that epilepsy has responded satisfactorily to treatment with GPI DBS, despite epilepsy often being resistant to antiepileptic therapies [13,16].
It is crucial to emphasize that certain symptoms cannot be fully attributed to the DNM1 variant, such as axonal sensory polyneuropathy and dysautonomia (manifesting as hyperhidrosis and nocturia in the patient). These symptoms could be possibly associated with the MFN2 variant, as observed in other cases [20,21,22,23]. Nonetheless, the MFN2 c.1574A>C variant is classified as likely benign according to ClinVar [24], based on its frequency in the general population, presence in unaffected individuals, preserved protein function, and lack of association in case-control studies [25,26]. Regarding the heterozygous variant c.94C>T found in the MRPS34 gene, it is well known that compound heterozygous or biallelic states are causal of LS [27]. This variant introduces a premature stop codon, resulting in a truncated protein. In autosomal recessive disorders, mild clinical manifestations have been documented in heterozygous carriers [28]. Therefore, we hypothesize that the identified MRPS34 variant may act as a disease-modifying gene, contributing to the development of LLS in the patient. However, the way the MRPS34 and MFN2 variants contribute to the patient’s clinical phenotype remains unclear. Despite being a simple heterozygous and likely benign variant respectively, we cannot rule out the possibility that these variants could contribute to the patient’s clinical scenario.
DBS has shown therapeutic benefit in mitochondrial disorders with generalized dystonia, parkinsonism-dystonia, and tremor [29,30,31]. Genotype-phenotype correlations are essential for surgical decision-making, as outcomes vary even within the same gene—for example, ATP1A3-related dystonia may respond differently depending on the clinical presentation [32]. Although reports of GPi-DBS in mitochondrial disorders are limited, emerging evidence—including this case—supports its potential efficacy in patients with pathogenic DNM1 variants.
Finally, we cannot explain the reason for which bilateral GPi-DBS improved not only movement disorders, but also seizures. Previous reports have shown that anterior and centromedian thalamic DBS is effective for epilepsy. However, DBS stimulating the caudate nucleus, cerebellum, hippocampus and subthalamic nuclei could exert benefit as well [33]. We speculate that GPi connections to the thalamus and cortex could be related to this unexpected improvement [34].
To our knowledge, no other LLS due to DNM1 pathogenic variant has been reported involving DBS surgery targeting the internal globus pallidus for dystonia control with a favorable outcome. Surgical approach may be useful for managing hyperkinesias in complex cases such as this one.
Funding Statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. This work received no financial support from public or private institutions.
Ethics and Consent
This manuscript was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Hospital Civil de Guadalajara “Fray Antonio Alcalde”.
A written consent was obtained from the patient’s guardian.
The authors confirm that they have read the journal’s position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this work is consistent with those guidelines.
Competing Interests
The authors have no competing interests to declare.
Author Contributions
All authors participated in the article research and preparation and approved the final version of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Leigh D. Subacute Necrotizing Encephalomyelopathy in an Infant. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry. 1951;14:216–221. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.14.3.216 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Schubert Baldo M, Vilarinho L. Molecular basis of Leigh syndrome: a current look. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases. 2020;15(1):1–14. DOI: 10.1186/s13023-020-1297-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Piao YS, Tang GC, Yang H, Lu DH. Clinico-neuropathological study of a Chinese case of familial adult Leigh syndrome. Neuropathology. 2006;26(3):218–221. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1789.2006.00686.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lee JS, Yoo T, Lee M, Lee Y, Jeon E, Kim SY, Lim BC, Kim KJ, Choi M, Chae JH. Genetic heterogeneity in Leigh syndrome: Highlighting treatable and novel genetic causes. Clinical Genetics. 2020;97(4):586–594. DOI: 10.1111/cge.13713 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.McCormick EM, Keller K, Taylor JP, Coffey AJ, Shen L, Krotoski D, Harding B, Gai NCMDGPX, Falk MJ, Zolkipli-Cunningham Z, Rahman S. Expert Panel Curation of 113 Primary Mitochondrial Disease Genes for the Leigh Syndrome Spectrum. Annals of Neurology. 2023;94(4):696–712. DOI: 10.1002/ana.26716 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Magro G, Laterza V, Tosto F. Leigh Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review of the Disease and Present and Future Treatments. Biomedicines. 2025;13(3):1–26. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines13030733 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chang X, Wu Y, Zhou J, Meng H, Zhang W, Guo J. A meta-analysis and systematic review od Leigh syndrome: clinical manifestations, respiratory chain enzyme complex deficiency, and gene mutations. Medicine. 2020;99(5):1–6. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018634 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lake NJ, Compton AG, Rahman S, Thorburn DR. Leigh Syndrome: One Disorder, More Than 75 Monogenic Causes. Annals of Neurology. 2016;79(2):190–203. DOI: 10.1002/ana.24551 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hong C-M, Na JH, Park S, Lee YM. Clinical Characteristics of Early-Onset and Late-Onset Leigh Syndrome. Frontiers in Neurology. 2020;11(267):1–8. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00267 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Huntsman RJ, Sinclair DB, Bhargava R, Chan A. Atypical Presentations of Leigh Syndrome: A Case Series and Review. Pediatric Neurology. 2005;32(5):334–340. DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2004.12.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rahman S. Chapter 4 – Leigh syndrome. In: Handbookof Clinical Neurology, Elsevier; 2023. pp. 43–63. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-821751-1.00015-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yigit G, Sheffer R, Daana M, Li Y, Kaygusuz E, Mor-Shakad H, Altmüller J, Nürnberg P, Douiev L, Kaulfuss S, Burfeind P, Wollnik B, Brockmann K. Loss-of-function variants in DNM1 cause a specific form of developmental and epileptic encephalopathy only in biallelic state. Neurogenetics. 2022;59(6):549–553. DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2021-107769 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.John A, Ng-Cordell E, Hanna N, Brkic D, Baker K. The neurodevelopmental spectrum of synaptic vesicle cycling disorders. Journal of Neurochemistry. 2020;157(2):208–228. DOI: 10.1111/jnc.15135 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zaha K, Matsumoto H, Itoh M, Saitsu H, Kato K, Kato M, Ogata S, Murayama K, Kishita Y, Mizuno Y, Kohda M, Nishino I, Ohtake A, Okazaki Y, Matsumoto N, Nonoyama S. DNM1L-related encephalopathy in infancy with Leigh syndrome-like phenotype and suppression-burst. Clinical genetics. 2016;90(5):472–474. DOI: 10.1111/cge.12805 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ferguson SM, De Camilli P. Dynamin, a membrane-remodeling GTPase. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology. 2012;13(2):75–88. DOI: 10.1038/nrm3266 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.von Spiczak S, Helbig KL, Shinde DN, Huether R, Dipl-Biol MP, Lourenço C, Nunes ME, Sarco DP, Kaplan RA, Dlugos DJ, Kirsch H, Slavotinek A, Cilio MR, Cervenka MC, Cohen JS, McClellan R, Fatemi A, Yuen A, Sagawa Y, Littlejohn R, McLean SD, Hernandez-Hernandez L, Maher B, Møller RS, Palmer E, Lawson JA, Campbell CA, Joshi CN, Kolbe DL, Hollingsworth G, Neubauer BA, Muhle H, Stephani U, Scheffer IE, Pena SDJ, Sisodiya SM, Helbig I. DNM1 encephalopathy. A new disease of vesicle fission. Neurology. 2017;89(4):385–394. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Brereton E, Fassi E, Araujo GC, Dodd J, Telegrafi A, Pathak SJ, Shinawi M. Mutations in the PH Domain of DNM1 are associated with a nonepileptic phenotype characterized by developmental delay and neurobehavioral abnormalities. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine. 2018;6(2):394–300. DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.362 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Baertling F, Rodenburg RJ, Schaper J, Smeitink JA, Koopman WJH, Mayatepek E, Morava E, Distelmaier F. A guide to diagnosis and treatment of Leigh syndrome. Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry. 2014;85(3):257–265. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-304426 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Choi E, Dale B, RamachandranNair R, Ejaz R. Pathogenic DNM1 Gene Variant Presenting With Unusually Nonsevere Neurodevelopmental Phenotype: A Case Report. Neurology Genetics. 2021;7(5):1–4. DOI: 10.1212/NXG.0000000000000618 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Calvo J, Funalot B, Ouvrier R, Lazaro L, Toutain A, De Mas P, Bouche P, Gilbert-Dussardier B, Arne-Bes M-C, Carrière J-P, Journel H, Minot-Myhie M-C, Guillou C, Ghorab K, Magy L, Sturtz F, Vallat J-M, Magdelaine C. Genotype-Phenotype Correlations in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Type 2 Caused by Mitofusin 2 Mutations. Archives of Neurology. 2009;66(12):1511–1516. DOI: 10.1001/archneurol.2009.284 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pipis M, Feely SME, Polke JM, Skorupinska M, Perez L, Shy RR, Laura M, Morrow JM, Moroni I, Pisciotta C, Taroni F, Vujovic D, Lloyd TE, Acsadi G, Yum SW, Lewis RA, Finkel RS, Herrmann DN, Day JW, Li J, Saporta M, Sadjadi R, Walk D, Burns J, Muntoni F, Ramchandren S, Hovarth R, Johnson NE, Züchner S, Pareyson D, Scherer SS, Rossor AM, Shy ME, Reilly MM. Natural history of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2A: a large international multicentre study. Brain. 2020;143(12):3589–3602. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awaa323 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Abati E, Manini A, Velardo D, Del Bo R, Napoli L, Rizzo F, Moggio M, Bresolin N, Bellone E, Bassi MT, D’Angelo MG, Comi GP, Corti S. Clinical and genetic features of a cohort of patients with MFN2-related neuropathy. Scientific reports. 2022;12(1):6181. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-10220-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Boaretto F, Vettori A, Casarin A, Vazza G, Muglia M, Rossetto MG, Cavallaro T, Rizzuto N, Carelli V, Salviati L, Mostacciuolo ML, Martinuzzi A. Severe CMT Type 2 With Fatal Encephalopathy Associated With a Novel MFN2 Splicing Mutation. Neurology. 2010;74(23):1919–1921. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181e240f9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.National Center for Biotechnology Information. National Library of Medicine. ClinVar. 16 March 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/RCV000692017/. [Accessed 17 March 2025]. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Laššuthová P, Brožková DŠ, Krůtová M, Neupauerová J, Haberlová J, Mazanec R, Dřímal P, Seeman P. Improving diagnosis of inherited peripheral neuropathies through gene panel analysis. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases. 2016;11(1):1–10. DOI: 10.1186/s13023-016-0500-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Nykamp K, Anderson M, Powers M, Garcia J, Herrera B, Ho Y-Y, Kobayashi Y, Patil N, Thusberg J, Westbrook M, The Invitae Clinical Genomics Group, Topper S. Sherloc: a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG-AMP variant classification criteria. Genetics in Medicine. 2017;19(10):1105–1117. DOI: 10.1038/gim.2017.37 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lake NJ, Webb BD, Stroud DA, Richman TR, Ruzzenente B, Compton AG, Mountford HS, Pulman J, Zangarelli C, Rio M, Boddaert N, Assouline Z, Sherpa MD, Schadt EE, Houten SM, Byrnes J, McCormick EM, Zolkipli-Cunningham Z, Haude K, Zhang Z, Retterer K, Bai R, Calvo SE, Mootha VK, Christodoulou J, Rötig A, Filipovska A, Cristian I, Falk MJ, Metodiev MD, Thorburn DR. Biallelic Mutations in MRPS34 Lead to Instability of the Small Mitoribosomal Subunit and Leigh Syndrome. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 2017;101(2):239–254. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.07.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Rivas MA, Pirinen M, Conrad DF, Lek M, Tsang EK, Karczewski KJ, Maller JB, Kukurba KR, DeLuca DS, Fromer M, Ferreira PG, Smith KS, Zhang R, Zhao F, Banks E, Poplin R, Ruderfer DM, Purcell SM, Tukiainen T, Minikel EV, Stenson PD, Cooper DN, Huang KH, Sullivan TJ, Nedzel J, The GTEx Consortium, The Geuvadis Consortium, Bustamante CD, Li JB, Daly MJ, Guigo R, Donnelly P, Ardlie K, Sammeth M, Dermitzakis ET, McCarthy MI, Montgomery SB, Lappalainen T, MacArthur DG. Effect of predicted protein-truncating genetic variants on the human transcriptome. Human Genomics. 2015;348(6235):666–669. DOI: 10.1126/science.1261877 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Aniello MS, Martino D, Petruzzella V, Eleopra R, Mancuso M, Dell’Aglio R, Cavallo M, Siciliano G, Defazio G. Bilateral Striatal Necrosis, Dystonia and Multiple Mitochondrial DNA Deletions: Case Study and Effect of Deep Brain Stimulation. Movement Disorders: official journal of the Movement Disorders Society. 2008;23(1):114–118. DOI: 10.1002/mds.21760 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Pelzer E, Pauls AKM, Binder E, Brunn A, Fink GR, Timmermann L. Deep brain stimulation in rapidly progressive parkinson-dystonia syndrome due to mitochondrial disorder. Parkinsonism and Related Disorders. 2012;18(5):672–674. DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2011.10.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kovacs N, Pal E, Balas I, Janszky J, Nagy F, Merkli H. Neurosurgical Treatment of Tremor in Mitochondrial Encephalopathy. Movement Disorders: offial journal of the Movement Disorder Society. 2006;21(12):2227–2230. DOI: 10.1002/mds.21128 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zúñiga-Ramírez C, Kramis-Hollands M, Mercado-Pimentel R, González-Usigli HA, Sáenz-Farret M, Soto-Escageda A, Fasano A. Generalized Dystonia and Paroxysmal Dystonic Attacks due to a Novel ATP1A3 Variant. Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements. 2019;13(9). DOI: 10.5334/tohm.490 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zangiabadi N, Ladino LD, Sina F, Orozco-Hernández JP, Carter A, Téllez-Zenteno JF. Deep Brain Stimulation and Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Review of the Literature. Frontiers in Neurology. 2019;10(601):1–18. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00601 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Okromelidze L, Tsuboi T, Eisinger RS, Burns MR, Charbel M, Rana M, Grewal SS, Lu CQ, Almeida L, Foote KD, Okun MS, Middlebrooks EH. Functional and Structural Connectivity Patterns Associated with Clinical Outcomes in Deep Brain Stimulation of the Globus Pallidus Internus fro Generalized Dystonia. AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2020;41(3):508–514. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6429 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]