Skip to main content
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1998 May 19;158(10):1289–1296.

The need for acute, subacute, and nonacute care at 105 general hospital sites on Ontario

V F Flintoft 1, J I Williams 1, R C Williams 1, A S Basinski 1, P Blackstien-Hirsch 1, C D Naylor 1
PMCID: PMC1229322  PMID: 9614821

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies of hospital utilization have not taken into account the use of acute care beds for subacute care. The authors determined the proportion of patients who required acute, subacute and nonacute care on admission and during their hospital stay in general hospitals in Ontario. From this analysis, they identified areas where the efficiency of care delivery might be improved. METHODS: Ninety-eight of 189 acute care hospitals in Ontario, at 105 sites, participated in a review that used explicit criteria for rating acuity developed by Inter-Qual Inc., Marlborough, Mass. The records of 13,242 patients who were discharged over a 9-month period in 1995 after hospital care for 1 of 8 high-volume, high-variability diagnoses or procedures were randomly selected for review. Patients were categorized on the basis of the level of care (acute, subacute or nonacute) they required on admission and during subsequent days of hospital care. RESULTS: Of all admissions, 62.2% were acute, 19.7% subacute and 18.1% nonacute. The patients most likely to require acute care on admission were those with acute myocardial infarction (96.2% of 1826 patients) or cerebrovascular accident (84.0% of 1596 patients) and those admitted for elective surgery on the day of their procedure (73.4% of 3993 patients). However, 41.1% of patients awaiting hip or knee replacement were admitted the day before surgery so did not require acute care on admission. The proportion of patients who required acute care on admission and during the subsequent hospital stay declined with age; the proportion of patients needing nonacute care did not vary with age. After admission, acute care was needed on 27.5% of subsequent days, subacute care on 40.2% and nonacute care on 32.3%. The need for acute care on admission was a predictor of need for acute care during subsequent hospital stay among patients with medical conditions. The proportion of patients requiring subacute care during the subsequent hospital stay increased with age, decreased with the number of inpatient beds in each hospital and was highest among patients with congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and pneumonia. INTERPRETATION: In 1995, inpatients requiring subacute care accounted for a substantial proportion of nonacute care days in Ontario's general hospitals. These findings suggest a need to evaluate the efficiencies that might be achieved by introducing a subacute category of care into the Canadian health care system. Generally, efforts are needed to reduce the proportion of admissions for nonacute care and of in-hospital days for other than acute care.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (164.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Booth B. M., Ludke R. L., Wakefield D. S., Kern D. C., du Mond C. E. Relationship between inappropriate admissions and days of care: implications for utilization management. Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1991 Fall;36(3):421–437. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DeCoster C., Roos N. P., Carrière K. C., Peterson S. Inappropriate hospital use by patients receiving care for medical conditions: targeting utilization review. CMAJ. 1997 Oct 1;157(7):889–896. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dubois R. W. Reducing unnecessary care: different approaches to the "big ticket" and the "little ticket" items. J Ambul Care Manage. 1991 Oct;14(4):30–37. doi: 10.1097/00004479-199110000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gertman P. M., Restuccia J. D. The appropriateness evaluation protocol: a technique for assessing unnecessary days of hospital care. Med Care. 1981 Aug;19(8):855–871. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Goldfarb N. I., Hillman A. L., Eisenberg J. M., Kelley M. A., Cohen A. V., Dellheim M. Impact of a mandatory Medicaid case management program on prenatal care and birth outcomes. A retrospective analysis. Med Care. 1991 Jan;29(1):64–71. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199101000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Stahl D. A. Subacute care: the future of health care. Nurs Manage. 1994 Oct;25(10):34, 36, 38-40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Strumwasser I., Paranjpe N. V., Ronis D. L., Share D., Sell L. J. Reliability and validity of utilization review criteria. Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol, Standardized Medreview Instrument, and Intensity-Severity-Discharge criteria. Med Care. 1990 Feb;28(2):95–111. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199002000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Winickoff R. N., Fischer M. A., August B. J. Appropriateness of short-stay admissions for procedures in six Veterans Affairs hospitals. QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1991 Dec;17(12):386–391. doi: 10.1016/s0097-5990(16)30489-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES