Skip to main content
Genes logoLink to Genes
. 2025 Jun 24;16(7):734. doi: 10.3390/genes16070734

Genome-Wide Identification and Analysis of bZIP Transcription Factor Gene Family in Broomcorn Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.)

Peipei An 1,*, Tianxiang Liu 2, Zhijie Shui 2, Panrong Ren 1, Shan Duan 1
Editor: Jacqueline Batley
PMCID: PMC12295044  PMID: 40725391

Abstract

Background: Basic (region) leucine zippers (bZIPs) make up one of the largest families and are some of the most prevalent evolutionarily conserved transcription factors (TFs) in eukaryotic organisms. Plant bZIP family members are involved in seed germination, vegetative growth, flower development, light response, and various biotic/abiotic stress response pathways. Nevertheless, a detailed identification and genome-wide analysis of the bZIP family genes in broomcorn millet have not been conducted. Methods: In this research, we performed genome-wide identification, phylogenetic analysis, cis-elements analysis, and expression pattern analysis. Results: 144 bZIP transcription factors were identified from the P. miliaceum genome and classified into eleven subfamilies using a phylogenetic analysis. Motif and bZIP domain sequence alignment analyses indicated that the members in each subfamily were relatively conserved. Furthermore, a promoter analysis revealed that bZIP transcription factor family genes were responsive to multiple hormones and environmental stresses. Additionally, cis-element MYB binding sites were identified in the promoters of most PmbZIP genes. A gene expression analysis showed that 18 PmbZIP genes were differentially expressed during seed germination in salt stress, with 7 being significantly downregulated and 11 upregulated, thus suggesting that these PmbZIP genes may play an important role in the salt stress response and seed germination. Conclusions: Current research provides valuable information for further functional analyses of the PmbZIP gene family and as a reference for future studies on broomcorn millet’s stress response.

Keywords: bZIP transcription factor family, Panicum miliaceum, genome-wide investigation, phylogenetic analysis, gene structure display, expression analysis during germination, abiotic stress response, abscisic acid (ABA) response

1. Introduction

Broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) is one of the plants that was cultivated the earliest in the world and is also known as millet, common millet, or proso millet. It has been cultivated for more than 10,000 years and played significant roles in food security and cultural history in China [1]. Broomcorn millet has a short growing period and is the most water-efficient; has a high salt tolerance and good nutrient resource usage efficiency; and is high in proteins, certain minerals, and antioxidants compared to most other cereals [2,3,4]. Broomcorn millet is an allotetraploid with 36 chromosomes (2n = 4× = 36) [5], and its genome size is approximated to be ~923 Mb [6]. As a C4 photosynthesis crop that is closely related to the bioenergy crop switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.), broomcorn millet has been reported to have the maximum water use efficiency (WUE), which may be due to its slow breathing rate, short generation time (about 60–90 days), and high harvest index [7,8,9]. Progress in molecular biology research on broomcorn millet is slow, and only a simple genetic map and a few genetic markers have been found. In 2019, the millet genome was sequenced, and phylogenetic analysis showed that millet divided into broomcorn millet and foxtail millet ~13.1 million years ago (Mya), while broomcorn millet became an allotetraploid ~5.91 million years ago [10]. One study also identified C4 candidate genes in broomcorn millet, and these genes were found to be spread over all three C4 subtypes, thus suggesting that broomcorn millet coexisted in three different carbon fixation pathways [6]. In the immediate future, broomcorn millet will become a crucial crop that can help in diversifying agriculture and promoting a healthier diet for humans. Therefore, searching for and identifying advantageous genes in millet will facilitate further basic scientific research on molecular breeding processes.

Transcription factors (TFs, also called trans-regulatory factors) are proteins with DNA-binding function, and they bind to specific cis-regulatory elements (cis-elements) and directly regulate the transcription of DNA to mRNA [11]. There are more divergent TF families and more unique DNA-binding domains (DBDs) in plant genomes [12], which also play a vital role in the regulation of growth, development, and environmental response. Structurally, TFs are usually classified by their DNA-binding domains: Basic (region) leucine zipper (bZIP) TFs have a basic region that binds DNA in the N-terminal and a leucine zipper dimerization motif in the C-terminal [13]. The basic DNA-binding region is an invariant N-X7-R/K motif, which has asparagine (N) and basic (R/K) residues with exact spacing; meanwhile, the ZIP domain within an alpha helix consists of heptad repeats of leucine (L) or a related hydrophobic amino acid [14]. Charged amino acids produce attractive and repulsive g-e’ pairs to regulate dimerization specificity and bind to DNA [15].

Among various transcription factor families in plants, basic leucine zipper (bZIP) proteins represent one of the most conserved and extensively studied groups. They are involved in diverse biological processes, particularly in mediating plant responses to abiotic stresses such as drought, salinity, and cold. bZIP transcription factors are well known for their central role in abscisic acid (ABA)-dependent signaling pathways, especially the PP2C–SnRK2–AREB cascade, which regulates key stress-adaptive responses and seed germination [16]. Compared to other transcription factor families (e.g., zinc finger and bHLH), bZIP genes have been more directly linked to core hormonal and environmental response mechanisms. To date, many plant bZIP transcription factor families have been identified and characterized extensively, including 78 AtbZIPs in Arabidopsis thaliana [13,14], 89 OsbZIPs in rice (Oryza sativa) [17], 187 TabZIPs in wheat (Triticum aestivum) [18], 85 SibZIPs in foxtail millet (Setaria italica), 103 OebZIPs in olive (Olea europaea) [19], 154 PhebZIPs in bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis) [20], 247 BnbZIPs in Brassica napus [21], 50 FvbZIPs in strawberry (Fragaria vesca) [22], 115 ZlbZIPs in Zizania latifolia [23], and 66 ItfbZIPs in sweet potato (Ipomoea trifida) [24]. Numerous studies have shown that different subgroups of bZIP TFs are involved in multiple regulation pathways in plants. bZIP TFs in Group A mainly take part in ABA signaling [25,26,27], abiotic stress responses [28,29,30,31], seed germination [32,33], and plant floral transition control [34,35,36]; bZIP TFs in Groups B and K are important regulators of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response [14,37]; those in Groups C and S regulate sucrose signaling and seed storage protein production [38,39,40]; those in Group D are involved in detoxification processes and pathogen defense responses with salicylic acid (SA) defenses against biotrophic pathogens, as well as the defense of hormones jasmonic acid (JA) and ethylene (ET) against necrotrophies [14,41,42,43,44,45,46]; E-members and M-members might control pollen development [47]; F subfamily members control genes that encode for Zn transporters [14,48,49]; those in Groups G and J have been reported to regulate ER–Golgi transport and pathogen defense [50,51]; H-members are implicated in multiple hormone signaling pathways and development during light regulation [52,53,54]; bZIP TFs in Group I participate in osmosensory responses and root bending regulation [55,56]. bZIP target sequences often contain an ACGT core [57], such as G-box (CACGTG), C-box (GACGTC), A-box (TACGTA), etc. However, one investigator also found that some bZIPs can bind non-ACGT sequences [58,59].

Although the function of bZIP TFs has been reported and their identification and analysis have been conducted in Arabidopsis and many species, their roles in broomcorn millet remain largely unknown. In our previous transcriptome analysis of broomcorn millet (P.miliaceum) under salt stress [60], we observed that a substantial number of bZIP genes were differentially expressed during seed germination. This suggests that bZIP transcription factors may play important regulatory roles in the stress tolerance mechanisms of this highly resilient cereal crop. This study systematically analyzes biological information about bZIP TFs in broomcorn millet, aiming to provide a reference for the identification of various functions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Genome-Wide Identification and Prediction of Physicochemical Properties

Broomcorn millet genomic sequences, coding region sequences (coding sequence, CDS), and protein sequences were downloaded from NCBI under BioProject number PRJNA431363 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/?term=PRJNA431363, accessed on 23 June 2022). We referred to the Pfam number (PF00170) of bZIP transcription factors in the Pfam database (http://pfam.xfam.org/, accessed on 23 June 2022) and used the HMMER program based on a Hidden Markov Model (3.3.2) to search for the candidate bZIP proteins in broomcorn millet. The HMM profile was used to perform an hmmscan search against the P.miliaceum protein database with an E-value threshold of 1 × 10−5. We used protein sequences with a result greater than “0” as candidate sequences, and then, the candidate gene protein sequence was extracted using TBtools (v1.0692) [61]. Finally, all candidate protein sequences were further detected and identified via CDD (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/cdd/, accessed on 22 June 2022) and PFAM, and proteins without bZIP domains were removed. The proteins were named according to the location of the bZIP transcription factor on the chromosome. The theoretical isoelectric point and molecular weight of the bZIP transcription factor proteins in broomcorn millet were calculated using ExPASy—Compute pI/Mw (https://web.expasy.org/compute_pi/, accessed on 25 June 2022).

2.2. Phylogeny Analyses and bZIP Domain Amino Acid Sequence Alignment

A.thaliana bZIP TF protein sequences were downloaded from the database TAIR (https://www.arabidopsis.org/index.jsp, accessed on 2 July 2022), and S.italica bZIP TF protein sequences were downloaded from the database Phytozome v12 (http://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/pz/portal.html, accessed on 2 July 2022). A bootstrap neighbor-joining (NJ) evolutionary tree was created using MEGA 6.06 (https://www.megasoftware.net/, accessed on 7 July 2022) software with 1000 bootstrap replicates based on the sequence alignments. Additionally, the sequence alignment of the bZIP domain from broomcorn millet was performed using Clustal X 1.8.

2.3. Motif and Intron/Exon Gene Structure Analysis

The MEME v5.3.0 online service (http://meme-suite.org/tools/meme, accessed on 13 August 2022) was employed to identify conserved motifs in PmbZIP proteins, using parameters that included a maximum of 12 motifs and an optimal motif width ranging from 6 to 50 amino acids. Afterward, all identified motifs were annotated using InterProScan (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/pfa/iprscan/, accessed on 16 August 2022), and the gene structure display server program (http://gsds.cbi.pku.edu.cn/, accessed on 30 August 2022) was used to draw the gene structures of PmbZIPs.

2.4. Promoter Analysis

The 2000 base pairs preceding the initiation codon of each PmbZIP gene was obtained. These sequences were analyzed to find cis-elements using the PlantCARE online tool (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/, accessed on 17 October 2022), and the outcomes were visualized with TBtools (v1.0692) [61].

2.5. RNA Isolation and bZIP Gene Expression Analysis

The samples of yumi1 and yumi9, which were grown in 0 mM of NaCl (RO water) and 250 mM NaCl, respectively, were collected at 0 h and 3 h, and dew white seeds were harvested after continuous light conditions commenced. (There were three independent biological replicates for each sample). The samples were swiftly frozen with liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C. In total, thirty-six samples were employed for RNA-Seq and differential expression analyses.

For transcriptome analysis, total RNA was isolated from seeds using the RNA prep Pure polysaccharide polyphenol plant total RNA extraction kit (DP441) (TIANGEN, Beijing, China). Using 1% agarose gels tested RNA degradation and contamination, and RNA purity was evaluated using a NanoPhotometer® spectrophotometer (IMPLEN, Munich, Germany). RNA concentration was measured using Qubit® RNA Assay Kit in Qubit® 2.0 Flurometer (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system’s RNA Nano 6000 Assay Kit was used to assess RNA integrity (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

A differential expression analysis of two conditions/groups was performed. The DESeq R package (version 1.10.1) was used to analyze differential expression between two conditions or groups. DESeq offers statistical methods to identify differential expression data, utilizing a model based on the negative binomial distribution. The Benjamini and Hochberg method was used to adjust the resulting p-values to control the false discovery rate, and differentially expressed genes were those with an adjusted p-value under 0.05. The creation of heatmaps and the cluster analysis of PmbZIPs were accomplished using TBtools software [61].

3. Results

3.1. Identification of PmbZIPs in Broomcorn Millet

To identify bZIP genes in the complete P. miliaceum genome, the Hidden Markov Model (HMM) profile file of the bZIP domain (PF00170) was exploited as a query file for a search across the P. miliaceum protein sequence data, and the Pfam and CDD databases were used to confirm the presence of the complete bZIP domain. As shown in Table 1, we identified 144 PmbZIP genes in the P. miliaceum genome after removing redundant sequences and designated them as PmbZIP1 to PmbZIP144 according to their chromosome locus. Moreover, the physical and chemical properties of the 144 PmbZIPs were analyzed, such as amino acid (aa) length, molecular weight (MW), and protein isoelectric (PI) points. Chromosomal localization shows that there are 14 PmbZIPs in Chr5, which has the most bZIP genes, but Chr15, Chr16, and Chr17 only have 2 PmbZIPs. Genome sequence analyses were conducted and showed that PmbZIPs ranged from 369 base pairs (bp, PmbZIP100, PmbZIP114) to 12,828 bp (PmbZIP45). Protein sequence analyses showed that the PmbZIPs ranged from 78 aa (PmbZIP59) to 650 aa (PmbZIP51) in length. The predicted MWs ranged from 9.19 kDa (PmbZIP59) to 68.3 kDa (PmbZIP51), and the PIs ranged from 4.52 (PmbZIP102) to 11.57 (PmbZIP43).

Table 1.

Identification and summary of information on Panicum miliaceum bZIP transcription factors (PmbZIPs) in broomcorn millet.

Gene ID Protein
Number
Gene
Number
Chr Gene Location Gene Length/bp CDS/nt Amino
Acids
PI Molecular Weight/u
PmbZIP1 RLN41431.1 PM01G00370 1 454801–457374 2574 1263 421 5.71 44,828.00
PmbZIP2 RLN41707.1 PM01G08790 1 7046270–7059039 12,770 1149 383 9.13 40,969.23
PmbZIP3 RLN40362.1 PM01G12600 1 10097025–10098402 1378 486 162 10.55 17,692.55
PmbZIP4 RLN40088.1 PM01G13370 1 10863218–10866321 3104 912 304 9.45 34,047.74
PmbZIP5 RLN40734.1 PM01G13620 1 11058035–11060820 2786 684 228 9.84 24,396.40
PmbZIP6 RLN39254.1 PM01G14300 1 11670497–11674442 3946 1053 351 6.23 37,904.15
PmbZIP7 RLN41556.1 PM01G19740 1 16954898–16957707 2810 1161 387 7.23 41,543.20
PmbZIP8 RLN41102.1 PM01G22630 1 19957313–19960138 2826 1056 352 6.88 37,179.95
PmbZIP9 RLN42614.1 PM01G23610 1 20646169–20649807 3639 1242 414 5.06 42,598.17
PmbZIP10 RLN40049.1 PM01G26880 1 22949190–22950304 1115 615 205 10.18 22,321.56
PmbZIP11 RLN19317.1 PM02G26900 2 39030059–39034459 4401 1050 350 6.28 37,679.93
PmbZIP12 RLN19126.1 PM02G27550 2 39595051–39597823 2773 702 234 10.00 24,691.66
PmbZIP13 RLN18095.1 PM02G27800 2 39766627–39771830 5204 999 333 7.04 37,066.87
PmbZIP14 RLN17017.1 PM02G32070 2 43256944–43264901 7958 1149 383 9.20 40,881.04
PmbZIP15 RLN15790.1 PM02G38970 2 48295652–48298282 2631 1224 408 5.60 43,833.94
PmbZIP16 RLN15762.1 PM02G44000 2 51665787–51668165 2379 1161 387 6.10 41,310.03
PmbZIP17 RLN17495.1 PM02G44930 2 52341406–52345126 3721 1260 420 4.97 43,404.97
PmbZIP18 RLN18647.1 PM02G46570 2 53532299–53532877 579 579 193 10.48 21,390.51
PmbZIP19 RLN33487.1 PM03G00660 3 678937–679488 552 552 184 7.21 20,564.99
PmbZIP20 RLN33484.1 PM03G01530 3 1468835–1474450 5616 1014 338 9.88 36,231.59
PmbZIP21 RLN33244.1 PM03G03170 3 2666045–2670259 4215 1140 380 6.22 40,613.30
PmbZIP22 RLN32939.1 PM03G03540 3 2944837–2947710 2874 1464 488 9.20 51,669.75
PmbZIP23 RLN34898.1 PM03G04810 3 3889634–3890848 1215 639 213 6.84 22,223.95
PmbZIP24 RLN35613.1 PM03G16340 3 12865234–12869532 4299 1107 369 6.61 39,460.24
PmbZIP25 RLN33050.1 PM03G16790 3 13287052–13290598 3547 1005 335 8.90 37,308.18
PmbZIP26 RLN35551.1 PM03G16900 3 13342155–13343818 1664 783 261 10.02 28,735.61
PmbZIP27 RLN35711.1 PM03G21650 3 18768221–18771281 3061 1179 393 5.01 42,558.22
PmbZIP28 RLN33934.1 PM03G24730 3 22107028–22110718 3691 1161 387 6.61 39,600.43
PmbZIP29 RLN35629.1 PM03G29190 3 35167059–35175866 8808 1257 419 8.44 46,181.77
PmbZIP30 RLN35964.1 PM03G36770 3 57531413–57534679 3267 1122 374 5.10 39,436.23
PmbZIP31 RLM84895.1 PM04G07270 4 6860114–6863550 3437 1233 411 7.18 42,128.33
PmbZIP32 RLM86983.1 PM04G16890 4 29725581–29732074 6494 1122 374 9.54 41,241.35
PmbZIP33 RLM85912.1 PM04G17970 4 31027628–31030792 3165 1392 464 9.15 49,993.48
PmbZIP34 RLM85616.1 PM04G18960 4 31857501–31858542 1042 534 178 8.95 20,269.87
PmbZIP35 RLM87231.1 PM04G19820 4 32472417–32480988 8572 1491 497 7.51 55,166.25
PmbZIP36 RLM85816.1 PM04G21680 4 33883522–33886493 2972 1464 488 9.53 51,605.73
PmbZIP37 RLM86211.1 PM04G22100 4 34132892–34136810 3919 1140 380 6.38 40,629.39
PmbZIP38 RLM85470.1 PM04G22810 4 34716923–34718185 1263 753 251 7.83 26,101.09
PmbZIP39 RLM87366.1 PM04G29540 4 39691716–39694242 2527 1491 497 5.86 60,644.54
PmbZIP40 RLM85147.1 PM04G34030 4 42747464–42752113 4650 1116 372 6.27 39,659.45
PmbZIP41 RLM86171.1 PM04G34490 4 43064867–43067475 2609 1014 338 8.90 37,565.47
PmbZIP42 RLM87099.1 PM04G34620 4 43157454–43160933 3480 885 295 9.59 32,209.76
PmbZIP43 RLN30372.1 PM05G00470 5 481032–481791 760 495 165 11.57 17,411.98
PmbZIP44 RLN29606.1 PM05G02460 5 2429710–2436988 7279 1305 435 5.93 47,002.20
PmbZIP45 RLN28633.1 PM05G04900 5 4731398–4744225 12,828 1812 604 4.88 65,083.35
PmbZIP46 RLN27945.1 PM05G05230 5 5015435–5016619 1185 603 201 9.19 21,729.48
PmbZIP47 RLN28345.1 PM05G05380 5 5101092–5106900 5809 1449 483 6.25 52,474.70
PmbZIP48 RLN27488.1 PM05G08030 5 7121364–7128050 6687 1158 386 7.17 40,824.69
PmbZIP49 RLN29878.1 PM05G11380 5 10166559–10169754 3196 438 146 9.49 16,063.02
PmbZIP50 RLN30397.1 PM05G14850 5 13174076–13175991 1916 453 151 6.32 16,585.54
PmbZIP51 RLN29599.1 PM05G25250 5 46340685–46343488 2804 1950 650 8.15 68,282.36
PmbZIP52 RLN31068.1 PM05G29120 5 49501420–49504193 2774 1152 384 9.07 41,007.77
PmbZIP53 RLN28247.1 PM05G33670 5 53089874–53091765 1892 543 181 9.75 20,078.72
PmbZIP54 RLN28944.1 PM05G33910 5 53238531–53239814 1284 933 311 6.47 33,380.34
PmbZIP55 RLN28901.1 PM05G36440 5 55255118–55257485 2368 1062 354 6.68 39,751.11
PmbZIP56 RLN27558.1 PM05G36770 5 55582519–55584338 1820 780 260 9.55 26,952.16
PmbZIP57 RLN01174.1 PM06G02700 6 1946640–1949819 3180 1287 429 9.30 45,780.45
PmbZIP58 RLN00773.1 PM06G08160 6 5838864–5840465 1602 438 146 9.93 15,983.02
PmbZIP59 RLN01167.1 PM06G14080 6 10158766–10159216 451 234 78 10.63 9190.60
PmbZIP60 RLM98944.1 PM06G14410 6 10441629–10450559 8931 999 333 6.26 35,600.39
PmbZIP61 RLM98085.1 PM06G17810 6 12976476–12980172 3697 999 333 6.55 36,500.10
PmbZIP62 RLM98033.1 PM06G17990 6 13102719–13104001 1283 921 307 6.46 32,832.58
PmbZIP63 RLN00565.1 PM06G20460 6 14965993–14968992 3000 777 259 9.73 26,937.16
PmbZIP64 RLM99485.1 PM06G21690 6 16055800–16057296 1497 1497 499 7.03 52,598.69
PmbZIP65 RLM99017.1 PM06G30890 6 39341652–39342104 453 453 151 6.85 16,674.63
PmbZIP66 RLM99272.1 PM06G35160 6 43290439–43290954 516 516 172 11.51 18,029.63
PmbZIP67 RLN24624.1 PM07G00440 7 317276–318073 798 570 190 9.98 20,307.29
PmbZIP68 RLN25705.1 PM07G06850 7 6745210–6748914 3705 1080 360 7.69 40,074.24
PmbZIP69 RLN24094.1 PM07G10230 7 8252890–8253306 417 417 139 7.65 15,279.28
PmbZIP70 RLN24562.1 PM07G17750 7 36088695–36092402 3708 1110 370 9.19 39,245.04
PmbZIP71 RLN22304.1 PM07G23470 7 41273483–41276065 2583 804 268 5.93 28,650.69
PmbZIP72 RLN22621.1 PM07G25750 7 43086731–43089115 2385 981 327 7.18 35,585.99
PmbZIP73 RLN22673.1 PM07G29370 7 45806587–45808150 1564 1206 402 6.29 42,396.98
PmbZIP74 RLN23257.1 PM07G29380 7 45812241–45821193 8953 1227 409 6.90 46,071.37
PmbZIP75 RLN24712.1 PM07G29810 7 46066329–46066976 648 648 216 9.75 21,645.44
PmbZIP76 RLN25012.1 PM07G36760 7 51457907–51459054 1148 564 188 10.01 20,446.76
PmbZIP77 RLN24441.1 PM07G38580 7 53023815–53026143 2329 921 307 6.62 32,963.72
PmbZIP78 RLM93109.1 PM08G01760 8 1448785–1451902 3118 999 333 6.00 36,038.19
PmbZIP79 RLM93604.1 PM08G03930 8 3296164–3296959 796 585 195 9.94 20,689.71
PmbZIP80 RLM91692.1 PM08G15750 8 30944899–30945294 396 396 132 8.40 14,577.57
PmbZIP81 RLM92180.1 PM08G20990 8 36451978–36454357 2380 831 277 9.31 30,542.73
PmbZIP82 RLM93703.1 PM08G25890 8 40248925–40252095 3171 819 273 6.01 28,971.03
PmbZIP83 RLM92419.1 PM08G28810 8 42140458–42146113 5656 1401 467 6.34 50,908.00
PmbZIP84 RLM94116.1 PM08G29030 8 42303295–42305878 2584 981 327 7.15 35,542.86
PmbZIP85 RLN12842.1 PM09G06500 9 5334910–5339163 4254 1092 364 8.70 39,102.69
PmbZIP86 RLN12841.1 PM09G12140 9 21889497–21890045 549 549 183 9.67 20,244.55
PmbZIP87 RLN13025.1 PM09G17690 9 43522067–43524827 2761 423 141 10.16 15,149.82
PmbZIP88 RLN12905.1 PM09G18590 9 44792601–44796981 4381 1257 419 9.11 44,598.29
PmbZIP89 RLN12453.1 PM09G18780 9 45041072–45044603 3532 912 304 4.83 32,658.00
PmbZIP90 RLN13126.1 PM09G20800 9 47002029–47003859 1831 849 283 6.24 30,013.48
PmbZIP91 RLN12623.1 PM09G24100 9 50246233–50248502 2270 477 159 9.00 17,365.70
PmbZIP92 RLM55632.1 PM10G06050 10 4576359–4581176 4818 1113 371 9.00 40,165.13
PmbZIP93 RLM54848.1 PM10G06130 10 4623806–4625917 2112 1524 508 9.16 55,261.12
PmbZIP94 RLM55196.1 PM10G10750 10 10699576–10701422 1847 735 245 10.88 27,271.78
PmbZIP95 RLM54794.1 PM10G15500 10 26027305–26029674 2370 525 175 9.75 18,810.58
PmbZIP96 RLM56218.1 PM10G16250 10 26722529–26726897 4369 1362 454 9.13 48,594.99
PmbZIP97 RLM55027.1 PM10G16410 10 26862899–26864549 1651 897 299 5.43 32,538.26
PmbZIP98 RLM55428.1 PM10G18250 10 28349450–28351117 1668 867 289 6.07 30,673.21
PmbZIP99 RLM56082.1 PM10G21570 10 31094548–31096463 1916 483 161 8.62 17,579.92
PmbZIP100 RLN09938.1 PM11G00290 11 452913–453281 369 369 123 8.97 13,810.34
PmbZIP101 RLN08312.1 PM11G02090 11 2470988–2476530 5543 1374 458 8.92 49,484.85
PmbZIP102 RLN07652.1 PM11G02220 11 2606668–2616433 9766 1035 345 4.52 35,333.37
PmbZIP103 RLN09078.1 PM11G02900 11 3245503–3248289 2787 939 313 5.42 33,095.76
PmbZIP104 RLN07125.1 PM11G13460 11 25503439–25506558 3120 1080 360 5.79 38,511.02
PmbZIP105 RLN09230.1 PM11G13790 11 25784422–25786801 2380 516 172 6.29 17,688.93
PmbZIP106 RLN07329.1 PM11G19430 11 38531228–38532874 1647 765 255 5.78 27,050.34
PmbZIP107 RLN08025.1 PM11G20550 11 40200637–40206785 6149 1797 599 9.76 65,299.21
PmbZIP108 RLN07962.1 PM11G20760 11 40430132–40431310 1179 567 189 9.02 20,553.29
PmbZIP109 RLN09062.1 PM11G24760 11 43626713–43632822 6110 1062 354 6.48 37,768.04
PmbZIP110 RLN07622.1 PM11G27250 11 46387650–46388183 534 534 178 8.65 20,643.10
PmbZIP111 RLM78368.1 PM12G01810 12 1318893–1319414 522 522 174 6.83 17,739.04
PmbZIP112 RLM78875.1 PM12G02550 12 1757193–1761266 4074 1362 454 8.20 47,603.58
PmbZIP113 RLM80422.1 PM12G04340 12 3257399–3260279 2881 924 308 5.20 32,615.15
PmbZIP114 RLM79681.1 PM12G05380 12 4052057–4052425 369 369 123 9.35 13,871.48
PmbZIP115 RLM80771.1 PM12G06150 12 4748641–4750662 2022 414 138 10.11 15,166.99
PmbZIP116 RLM79948.1 PM12G08110 12 6857609–6859787 2179 762 254 5.78 26,937.22
PmbZIP117 RLM79671.1 PM12G27010 12 38519464–38520329 866 510 170 7.93 19,646.96
PmbZIP118 RLM78209.1 PM12G28080 12 39453559–39458489 4931 1332 444 9.41 47,492.18
PmbZIP119 RLM79651.1 PM12G29310 12 40484976–40490089 5114 513 171 4.93 18,799.88
PmbZIP120 RLM80583.1 PM12G31970 12 42325452–42326207 756 519 173 9.00 18,729.10
PmbZIP121 RLN05398.1 PM13G04720 13 5033013–5042282 9270 1434 478 7.24 51,950.15
PmbZIP122 RLN05595.1 PM13G09960 13 25084063–25085042 980 261 87 9.65 9705.76
PmbZIP123 RLN04073.1 PM13G14010 13 35015891–35017421 1531 1209 403 6.37 42,408.97
PmbZIP124 RLN05004.1 PM13G14470 13 35292857–35295671 2815 810 270 9.25 28,271.05
PmbZIP125 RLN04831.1 PM13G19990 13 41033378–41036302 2925 999 333 5.76 34,879.32
PmbZIP126 RLN04579.1 PM13G20830 13 41770762–41771759 998 675 225 8.54 24,211.82
PmbZIP127 RLN03801.1 PM13G24510 13 45184706–45186681 1976 1218 406 6.61 43,025.01
PmbZIP128 RLN03549.1 PM13G25090 13 45582601–45583142 542 432 144 10.02 15,452.52
PmbZIP129 RLM61107.1 PM14G04080 14 3139207–3146477 7271 1263 421 6.53 45,595.62
PmbZIP130 RLM60470.1 PM14G09560 14 20687606–20688770 1165 441 147 9.34 16,666.93
PmbZIP131 RLM60601.1 PM14G16770 14 29385478–29388989 3512 1218 406 5.52 42,836.29
PmbZIP132 RLM61427.1 PM14G17480 14 30010114–30011044 931 654 218 8.82 23,453.05
PmbZIP133 RLM60401.1 PM14G19800 14 31888088–31890896 2809 1128 376 6.32 39,473.30
PmbZIP134 RLM61133.1 PM14G19990 14 32037397–32038999 1603 1227 409 6.43 43,304.39
PmbZIP135 RLM61596.1 PM14G21450 14 33079164–33079675 512 453 151 9.55 16,265.44
PmbZIP136 RLM74471.1 PM15G12970 15 28520231–28523482 3252 690 230 9.83 24,604.94
PmbZIP137 RLM74357.1 PM15G25820 15 39118732–39121503 2772 1608 536 7.97 58,416.77
PmbZIP138 RLM65300.1 PM16G12130 16 25119044–25121594 2551 786 262 5.10 27,207.24
PmbZIP139 RLM66084.1 PM16G21310 16 31781217–31790325 9109 1203 401 6.18 44,727.90
PmbZIP140 RLM70069.1 PM17G01920 17 1423232–1427747 4516 1389 463 6.25 50,766.87
PmbZIP141 RLM69114.1 PM17G02070 17 1594724–1595732 1009 675 225 8.98 24,596.61
PmbZIP142 RLM59076.1 PM18G00820 18 648118–653777 5660 1431 477 6.09 52,218.33
PmbZIP143 RLM57820.1 PM18G00930 18 761889–762898 1010 648 216 8.61 23,467.31
PmbZIP144 RLM58717.1 PM18G01220 18 1078921–1083128 4208 993 331 6.37 35,578.56

3.2. Phylogenetic and Sequence Conservation Analysis of PmbZIPs

A phylogenetic analysis was performed with all 144 identified PmbZIP proteins, as well as 75 Arabidopsis and 78 foxtail millet bZIP family members (Figure 1 and Figure S1), using the neighbor-joining (NJ) algorithm in MEGA software (MEGA6.06). The 144 PmbZIP genes were divided into ten groups (designated as A to E, G, H, I, S, and U) according to the subfamilies classified for Arabidopsis. Based on phylogenetic relationships, Group S contains 29 members and is the largest subfamily, and the smallest subfamilies are Groups B, E, and U, with only 3 members in each. It is interesting to note that no PmbZIP member was assigned to Group F. A total of 22 PmbZIPs were classified as belonging to Group A, 25 to Group D, 23 to Group I, 21 to Group G, 8 to Group C, and 7 to Group H.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Phylogenetic analysis of bZIP transcription factors in Arabidopsis thaliana, Setaria italica, and P. miliaceum. A maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was constructed using the full-length bZIP protein sequences from A. thaliana (At), S. italica (Si), and P. miliaceum (Pm). The bZIP proteins were classified into 11 subgroups, each represented by a distinct color. Subgroup names are indicated outside the tree. The grouping was supported by sequence similarity and domain conservation, revealing evolutionary relationships and potential functional conservation among bZIP family members across the three species.

3.3. Motif and Structural Analysis of PmbZIPs

To investigate the protein sequence features of PmbZIPs, 12 different motifs were identified in PmbZIPs (Figure 2), with lengths ranging from 21 to 50 aa. The phylogenetic analysis showed that the same clusters of PmbZIPs had similar conserved domain compositions, and obvious differences between different groups were also found. Motif 1, as a “basic region” of the bZIP domain, existed in all PmbZIPs. Additionally, motifs 4 and 7, as two different “leucine zippers” of the bZIP domain, existed in Groups B, C, E, G, I, and S and Groups A, D, H, and U, respectively. Specifically, the PmbZIPs in Group D contain the most motif types, including motifs 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, and 11. However, only motif 1 was present in PmbZIP135, PmbZIP128, PmbZIP38, and PmbZIP23 in Group S. This may be the reason why different subfamilies have different functions.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Motif analysis of P. miliaceum bZIP proteins. Twelve conserved motifs were identified. Each motif is represented by a colored box with a unique color corresponding to the motif number, as shown in the legend.

The structural diversity of the PmbZIP family was analyzed in terms of the exon/intron arrangement of the coding sequences. The number of introns in PmbZIPs ranged from zero to twelve. The detailed gene structure of PmbZIPs is pictured in Figure 3. Twelve introns were identified in PmbZIP104 and PmbZIP112, whereas 24 PmbZIPs were identified as intronless. Subgroups G and D generally contain more than seven introns, while subgroup S often has no introns. Most closely related PmbZIPs in the same class or subfamily share a similar gene structure in terms of the number of introns.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Gene structural analysis of PmbZIPs. The exon–intron structures of bZIP genes were visualized to compare their gene organization. Green rounded rectangles represent exons, and black solid lines indicate introns.

3.4. Promoter Analysis of PmbZIPs

To predict the biological function of PmbZIPs, 2000 bp upstream sequences from the translation start sites of PmbZIPs were analyzed using the PlantCARE database (Figure 4). The promoter of each PmbZIP consists of several cis-acting elements, such as phytohormone-responsive elements, MYB binding sites, light-responsive elements, anoxic-specific inducibility elements, abiotic stress-responsive elements, defense- and stress-responsive elements, seed-specific regulation elements, and root-specific elements. As illustrated in Table 2, a light-responsive element was identified in the promoters of all PmbZIPs. An abscisic acid-responsive element, methyl jasmonate (MeJA)-responsive element, and meristem expression element were identified in the promoters of 135, 128, and 99 PmbZIP genes, respectively. The promoters of 66 PmbZIPs contained an auxin-responsive element, 75 PmbZIPs contained a gibberellin-responsive element, and 55 PmbZIPs contained a salicylic acid-responsive element. Additionally, an MYB binding site, defense- and stress-responsive elements, a low-temperature-responsive element, and a zein metabolism regulation element were all found in 97, 33, 64, and 46 PmbZIPs, respectively. In total, PmbZIP143 promoters contained 73 (maximum) cis-elements, which included 34 light-responsive elements, 17 abscisic acid-responsive elements, 14 MeJA-responsive elements, 7 anoxic-specific inducibility elements, and 1 meristem expression element. However, PmbZIP21 promoters only contained 11 cis-elements. These findings demonstrate that PmbZIPs might be associated with various transcriptional regulations involving development, hormones, and stress responses.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Cis-element analysis of promoter regions of PmbZIPs. The cis-acting regulatory elements within the 2000 bp upstream promoter regions of bZIP genes were analyzed. Different cis-elements are represented by colored boxes, each corresponding to a specific functional category.

Table 2.

A summary of cis-elements in the PmbZIPs promoter.

Cis-Acting Element Element Number Gene Number
Abscisic acid responsiveness element 618 135
Anoxic specific inducibility element 220 90
Auxin-responsive element 95 66
Defense and stress responsiveness element 39 33
Endosperm expression element 29 25
Gibberellin-responsive element 108 75
Light responsive element 1655 144
Low-temperature responsiveness element 95 64
MeJA-responsiveness element 752 128
Meristem expression element 154 99
MYB binding site 175 97
Protein binding site 4 4
Rcircadian control element 40 30
Root specific element 7 5
Salicylic acid responsiveness element 72 50
Seed-specific regulation element 30 26
Wound-responsive element 8 8
Zein metabolism regulation element 61 46

3.5. Expression Analysis of PmbZIPs in Seed Germination Under Salt Stress

To explore the expression patterns of these millet bZIP genes, we used RNA-seq data of yumi1 (Y1) and yumi9 (Y9) under salt stress in the seed germination stage. Based on the millet RNA-seq data, 67 bZIP genes were detected in all three sampling stages at the gene level (Figure 5). This suggests that nearly half of bZIP genes are broadly expressed during millet germination and development. In addition, the fact that 18 bZIP genes have different expression levels suggests that these genes were induced by salt and have a vital function in tolerance responses. The heatmap analysis found that PmbZIP6, PmbZIP11, PmbZIP15, PmbZIP71, PmbZIP78, PmbZIP89, and PmbZIP97 are downregulated salinity-responsive genes (SRGs). Upregulated SRGs include PmbZIP26, PmbZIP30, PmbZIP33, PmbZIP65, PmbZIP70, PmbZIP104, PmbZIP107, PmbZIP113, PmbZIP118, PmbZIP125, and PmbZIP131. Interestingly, the differential expression of most SRGs occurs when water is imbibed for 3 h or during radicle protrusion (RAP) in the seed envelope stage, thus indicating that the seeds reinitiate metabolic processes and stress response in this period.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Expression heatmap of 67 differentially expressed bZIP genes. Samples were collected from two P. miliaceum varieties, Y1 and Y9, under control (CK) and salt treatment (NA) conditions at three time points. Gene expression levels were normalized (log2 (FPKM + 1)) and visualized to reveal temporal and treatment-specific expression patterns.

4. Discussion

In the immediate future, broomcorn millet will become a crucial crop that can help in diversifying agriculture and promoting a healthier diet for humans. Several plant bZIP transcription factor families have been identified and characterized extensively, which play a vital role in the regulation of growth, development, and environmental response. However, these gene families have not been reported in broomcorn millet. Therefore, searching for and identifying advantageous bZIP genes in millet will facilitate further basic scientific research on molecular breeding processes.

4.1. Characterization of Broomcorn Millet bZIP Gene Family

The genes involved in genome replication events can evolve into genes with new functions, which play an important role in expanding genome content and diversifying gene functions [62]. Previous research showed that the emergence of the broomcorn millet genome was the result of the ~5.6 MYA hybridization of two closely related genomes. Most Panicum species are polyploids native to the tropical/semi-arid regions of the world. Many gene families in the millet genome are double copies, most of which are retained by the parental species and single-copy genes of the parental species [6]. Since there are 78 bZIP genes in the foxtail millet genome, 144 bZIP genes were predicted to be in the P. miliaceum genome. In addition, many subfamily bZIP genes are double copies in broomcorn millet, except those in Groups B, E, F, and U; this is consistent with previous research. After genome duplication, nonfunctionalization (duplicated genes are silenced), subfunctionalization (function is partitioned between the new paralogs), and neofunctionalization (duplicated genes gain new functions) generally take place [63,64,65]. In this study, we found that Group F genes could have been lost or had changed functions during their evolution, thus suggesting that there was extensive gene loss during genome duplication.

A phylogenetic analysis of the PmbZIP gene family revealed that subfamilies A, D, and S contain a relatively large number of members that form well-supported and tightly clustered groups, thus suggesting potential functional conservation and lineage-specific expansion. Notably, the S subfamily appears to be divided into four smaller clades, which are interspersed among the members of the G, A, and C subfamilies. This branching pattern suggests that during evolution, some ancestral S-type bZIP members may have undergone functional divergence and structural differentiation, thus giving rise to new regulatory subgroups such as G, A, and C. These findings support the hypothesis that bZIP subfamily diversification has been driven by both sequence divergence and the acquisition of specialized regulatory roles in different stress and developmental contexts.

Among these subfamilies, Group A bZIP genes stand out due to their well-established roles in abscisic acid (ABA)-mediated stress responses. In our study, PmbZIP30 (PmABI5) and PmbZIP131, both belonging to Group A, were significantly induced by ABA during seed development in broomcorn millet [60]. This is consistent with findings in Arabidopsis and rice, where homologous Group A bZIPs (e.g., ABI5) act as core components in the ABA signaling pathway. Furthermore, cross-species evidence supports the involvement of Group A bZIPs in the conserved PP2C–SnRK2–AREB signaling module, which regulates plant responses to drought and other abiotic stresses. The promoter architecture and expression dynamics of Group A PmbZIP genes in this study reinforce the notion that their functional roles in ABA-dependent stress signaling are evolutionarily conserved. These results not only provide insight into the diversification and conservation of bZIP transcription factors in broomcorn millet but also highlight the adaptive significance of Group A members in stress tolerance.

4.2. Structural Analysis of PmbZIPs

The detailed understanding of the functional domain of A. thaliana and S. italica bZIPs enabled us to analyze similar domains within the broomcorn millet bZIP gene family. In this research, all 144 PmbZIP proteins contain the necessary basic domain, which provides the structural basis for their conserved function. Moreover, different subgroups have different ZIP motifs, which makes their functions differ. Groups A, D, H, and U have type I ZIP domains (motif 7, K-L-X7-R), and the main function of these subfamily genes is the regulation of biological and abiotic stresses. However, Groups B, C, E, G, I, and S have type II ZIP domains (motif 4, V-L-X8-R) that are involved in carbohydrate biosynthesis, post-transcriptional inhibition, development, and hormone synthesis. It has been reported that intron retention regulates protein isoform production, RNA stability and translation efficiency, and the rapid induction of expression via the post-transcriptional splicing of retained introns [66]. An analysis of the bZIP gene structure revealed that most intronless PmbZIPs occurred in Groups S and C, and a similar observation was reported for banana (Musa spp. L.) and switchgrass (P. virgatum L.) [67,68]. The PmbZIPs of subgroups A, C, and I, with relatively fewer introns, were associated with stress responses. This conclusion aligns with the results of the present and past studies [60].

4.3. Cis-Element Analysis in the Promoters of PmbZIPs

The cis-elements of different transcription factors have different functions. The number and form of cis-elements in promoter regions could play an essential role in the regulation of gene expression. The results illustrate that abiotic stress-related cis-elements, including abscisic acid-responsive elements, anoxic-specific inducibility elements, low-temperature-responsive elements, MeJA-responsive elements, MYB binding sites, salicylic acid-responsive elements, and wound-responsive elements, are major regulatory elements in the PmbZIP promoters activated by ABA, NaCl, or other forms of abiotic stress. In addition, many development-related cis-elements were also found, such as auxin-responsive elements, endosperm expression elements, gibberellin-responsive elements, root-specific elements, seed-specific regulation elements, and meristem expression elements. These findings suggest that light-responsive elements, abscisic acid-responsive elements, and MeJA-responsive elements play a vital role in transcriptional regulation in broomcorn millet. PmbZIP promoters present a lot of stress-responsive cis-elements and hormone response cis-elements, which indicates their potential roles in the response to stress and pathogen infections. Consequently, PmbZIPs are often taken as candidate genes to understand the responses to biotic stresses and plant development.

4.4. PmbZIP Involvement in Development and Stress Response

Previous reports have revealed that bZIP TFs function in many stress responses and development by regulating diverse biochemical and physiological pathways [17,69,70,71]. bZIP transcription factors possess different characteristics in different species. The overexpression of TabZIP15 in wheat can enhance root length and fresh weight during salt stress, thus suggesting that the TabZIP15 gene is involved in the regulation of wheat salt stress tolerance [72]. The homozygous T-DNA insertional mutants Osabf1-1 and Osabf1-2 are more sensitive in response to drought and salinity treatments than wild-type plants, and the OsNAC, OsLEA3, and OsABA45 genes are significantly suppressed in Osabf1 mutants. Hence, OsABF1 likely plays a positive role as an ABA-responsive transcription factor in abiotic stress signaling [26]. We incorporated and highlighted experimental data from our previous work, wherein PmbZIP30 was overexpressed in rice. The transgenic rice lines exhibited significantly shorter seed germination times compared to the wild-type, thus indicating a positive regulatory role of PmbZIP30 in seed germination and stress response. This functional validation supports the biological relevance of our bioinformatic findings (Figure S2). The overexpression of StbZIP65 in Arabidopsis enhanced salt tolerance [73]. However, some research shows that GmbZIP19 expression is significantly induced by ABA (abscisic acid), JA (jasmonic acid), and SA (salicylic acid) but is reduced under salt and drought stress conditions, thus suggesting that GmbZIP19 is a positive regulator of pathogen resistance and a negative regulator of salt and drought stress tolerance [74]. TabZIP6 can bind to the promoters of CBFs and decrease the expression of downstream COR genes in TabZIP6-overexpressing Arabidopsis seedlings; therefore, TabZIP6 is a negative regulator in the cold stress response [75].

In this study, a total of 144 PmbZIP genes were identified in the P. miliaceum genome and classified into eleven subfamilies based on phylogenetic relationships. Conserved motif and domain structure analyses revealed that the members within each subfamily exhibit high sequence conservation. The promoter analysis indicated that PmbZIP genes may be involved in multiple hormone signaling pathways and environmental stress responses, as reflected by the presence of diverse cis-acting regulatory elements, including MYB binding sites. The transcriptome analysis further showed that 18 PmbZIP genes were differentially expressed during seed germination under salt stress, thus suggesting their potential regulatory roles in abiotic stress adaptation. These findings provide a valuable resource for understanding the functional roles of bZIP transcription factors in broomcorn millet and lay the foundation for future stress resilience breeding and gene function studies.

Acknowledgments

We used the TBtools software (v1.0692) for this study.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes16070734/s1. Figure S1: Sequence conservation analysis of PmbZIPs. Figure S2: Overexpression of PmbZIP30 in rice accelerates seed germination.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, P.A.; writing—review and editing, P.R., S.D. and P.A.; supervision, T.L. and Z.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

This research was funded by the Doctoral Research Fund of Longdong University, grant number XYBYZK2206.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Lu H., Zhang J., Liu K.-B., Wu N., Li Y., Zhou K., Ye M., Zhang T., Zhang H., Yang X., et al. Earliest domestication of common millet (Panicum miliaceum) in East Asia extended to 10,000 years ago. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:7367–7372. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900158106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yue H., Wang M., Liu S., Du X., Song W., Nie X. Transcriptome-wide identification and expression profiles of the WRKY transcription factor family in Broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) BMC Genom. 2016;17:343. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-2677-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rajput S.G., Santra D.K., Schnable J.J.M.B. Mapping QTLs for morpho-agronomic traits in proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) Mol. Breed. 2016;36:37. doi: 10.1007/s11032-016-0460-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hunt H.V., Badakshi F., Romanova O., Howe C.J., Jones M.K., Heslop-Harrison J.S. Reticulate evolution in Panicum (Poaceae): The origin of tetraploid broomcorn millet, P. miliaceum. J. Exp. Bot. 2014;65:3165–3175. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wang H., Wang J., Chen C., Chen L., Li M., Qin H., Tian X., Hou S., Yang X., Jian J., et al. A complete reference genome of broomcorn millet. Sci. Data. 2024;11:657. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03489-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zou C., Li L., Miki D., Li D., Tang Q., Xiao L., Rajput S., Deng P., Peng L., Jia W., et al. The genome of broomcorn millet. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:436. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08409-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Baltensperger D.D. Progress in New Crops. ASHS Press; Alexandria, VA, USA: 1996. Foxtail and Proso Millet. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Washburn J.D., Schnable J.C., Davidse G., Pires J.C. Phylogeny and photosynthesis of the grass tribe Paniceae. Am. J. Bot. 2015;102:1493–1505. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1500222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cedric H., Matanguihan J.B., D’Alpoim Guedes J., Ganjyal G.M., Whiteman M.R., Kidwell K.K., Murphy K.M. Proso Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) and Its Potential for Cultivation in the Pacific Northwest, U.S.: A Review. Front. Plant Sci. 2016;7:1961. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Shi J., Ma X., Zhang J., Zhou Y., Liu M., Huang L., Sun S., Zhang X., Gao X., Zhan W. Chromosome conformation capture resolved near complete genome assembly of broomcorn millet. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:464. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07876-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lai X., Chahtane H., Martin-Arevalillo R., Zubieta C., Parcy F. Contrasted evolutionary trajectories of plant transcription factors. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2020;54:101–107. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2020.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.de Mendoza A., Sebé-Pedrós A., Šestak M.S., Matejcic M., Torruella G., Domazet-Loso T., Ruiz-Trillo I. Transcription factor evolution in eukaryotes and the assembly of the regulatory toolkit in multicellular lineages. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:E4858–E4866. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1311818110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jakoby M., Weisshaar B., Dröge-Laser W., Vicente-Carbajosa J., Tiedemann J., Kroj T., Parcy F. bZIP transcription factors in Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Sci. 2002;7:106–111. doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(01)02223-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Droge-Laser W., Snoek B.L., Snel B., Weiste C. The Arabidopsis bZIP transcription factor family-an update. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2018;45:36–49. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2018.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Deppmann C.D., Acharya A., Rishi V., Wobbes B., Smeekens S., Taparowsky E.J., Vinson C. Dimerization specificity of all 67 B-ZIP motifs in Arabidopsis thaliana: A comparison to Homo sapiens B-ZIP motifs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:3435–3445. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mathura S.R., Sutton F., Bowrin V. Characterization and expression analysis of SnRK2, PYL, and ABF/AREB/ABI5 gene families in sweet potato. PLoS ONE. 2023;18:e0288481. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nijhawan A., Jain M., Tyagi A.K., Khurana J.P. Genomic survey and gene expression analysis of the basic leucine zipper transcription factor family in rice. Plant Physiol. 2008;146:333–350. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.112821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Li X., Gao S., Tang Y., Li L., Zhang F., Feng B., Fang Z., Ma L., Zhao C. Genome-wide identification and evolutionary analyses of bZIP transcription factors in wheat and its relatives and expression profiles of anther development related TabZIP genes. BMC Genom. 2015;16:976. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-2196-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rong S., Wu Z., Cheng Z., Zhang S., Liu H., Huang Q. Genome-Wide Identification, Evolutionary Patterns, and Expression Analysis of bZIP Gene Family in Olive (Olea europaea L.) Genes. 2020;11:510. doi: 10.3390/genes11050510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pan F., Wu M., Hu W., Liu R., Yan H., Xiang Y. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analyses of the bZIP Transcription Factor Genes in moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis) Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:2203. doi: 10.3390/ijms20092203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhou Y., Xu D., Jia L., Huang X., Ma G., Wang S., Zhu M., Zhang A., Guan M., Lu K., et al. Genome-Wide Identification and Structural Analysis of bZIP Transcription Factor Genes in Brassica napus. Genes. 2017;8:288. doi: 10.3390/genes8100288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wang X.L., Chen X., Yang T.B., Cheng Q., Cheng Z.M. Genome-Wide Identification of bZIP Family Genes Involved in Drought and Heat Stresses in Strawberry (Fragaria vesca) Int. J. Genom. 2017;2017:3981031. doi: 10.1155/2017/3981031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jiang Y., Chen X., Wang F., Li X., Qin Z., Fan S., Yan N., Xie Y., Zhao R. Metabolomic response of Zizania latifolia to low-temperature stress and identification of the bZIP transcription factor family. GM Crops Food. 2025;16:413–434. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2025.2510715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yang Z., Sun J., Chen Y., Zhu P., Zhang L., Wu S., Ma D., Cao Q., Li Z., Xu T. Genome-wide identification, structural and gene expression analysis of the bZIP transcription factor family in sweet potato wild relative Ipomoea trifida. BMC Genet. 2019;20:41. doi: 10.1186/s12863-019-0743-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Banerjee A., Roychoudhury A. Abscisic-acid-dependent basic leucine zipper (bZIP) transcription factors in plant abiotic stress. Protoplasma. 2017;254:3–16. doi: 10.1007/s00709-015-0920-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Amir Hossain M., Lee Y., Cho J.I., Ahn C.H., Lee S.K., Jeon J.S., Kang H., Lee C.H., An G., Park P.B. The bZIP transcription factor OsABF1 is an ABA responsive element binding factor that enhances abiotic stress signaling in rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 2010;72:557–566. doi: 10.1007/s11103-009-9592-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Basso M.F., Iovieno P., Capuana M., Contaldi F., Ieri F., Menicucci F., Celso F.L., Barone G., Martinelli F. Identification and expression of the AREB/ABF/ABI5 subfamily genes in chickpea and lentil reveal major players involved in ABA-mediated defense response to drought stress. Planta. 2025;262:22. doi: 10.1007/s00425-025-04740-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zou M., Guan Y., Ren H., Zhang F., Chen F. A bZIP transcription factor, OsABI5, is involved in rice fertility and stress tolerance. Plant Mol. Biol. 2008;66:675–683. doi: 10.1007/s11103-008-9298-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hossain M.A., Cho J.I., Han M., Ahn C.H., Jeon J.S., An G., Park P.B. The ABRE-binding bZIP transcription factor OsABF2 is a positive regulator of abiotic stress and ABA signaling in rice. J. Plant Physiol. 2010;167:1512–1520. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2010.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Orellana S., Yañez M., Espinoza A., Verdugo I., González E., Ruiz-Lara S., Casaretto J.A. The transcription factor SlAREB1 confers drought, salt stress tolerance and regulates biotic and abiotic stress-related genes in tomato. Plant Cell Environ. 2010;33:2191–2208. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02220.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kim S., Kang J.Y., Cho D.I., Park J.H., Kim S.Y. ABF2, an ABRE-binding bZIP factor, is an essential component of glucose signaling and its overexpression affects multiple stress tolerance. Plant J. 2004;40:75–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02192.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kim J.H., Hyun W.Y., Nguyen H.N., Jeong C.Y., Xiong L., Hong S.W., Lee H. AtMyb7, a subgroup 4 R2R3 Myb, negatively regulates ABA-induced inhibition of seed germination by blocking the expression of the bZIP transcription factor ABI5. Plant Cell Environ. 2015;38:559–571. doi: 10.1111/pce.12415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Skubacz A., Daszkowska-Golec A., Szarejko I. The Role and Regulation of ABI5 (ABA-Insensitive 5) in Plant Development, Abiotic Stress Responses and Phytohormone Crosstalk. Front. Plant Sci. 2016;7:1884. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Maier A.T., Stehling-Sun S., Wollmann H., Demar M., Hong R.L., Haubeiss S., Weigel D., Lohmann J.U. Dual roles of the bZIP transcription factor PERIANTHIA in the control of floral architecture and homeotic gene expression. Development. 2009;136:1613–1620. doi: 10.1242/dev.033647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Abe M., Kobayashi Y., Yamamoto S., Daimon Y., Yamaguchi A., Ikeda Y., Ichinoki H., Notaguchi M., Goto K., Araki T. FD, a bZIP protein mediating signals from the floral pathway integrator FT at the shoot apex. Science. 2005;309:1052–1056. doi: 10.1126/science.1115983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Shu K., Chen Q., Wu Y., Liu R., Zhang H., Wang S., Tang S., Yang W., Xie Q. ABSCISIC ACID-INSENSITIVE 4 negatively regulates flowering through directly promoting Arabidopsis FLOWERING LOCUS C transcription. J. Exp. Bot. 2016;67:195–205. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Howell S.H. Endoplasmic reticulum stress responses in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2013;64:477–499. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Oñate L., Vicente-Carbajosa J., Lara P., Díaz I., Carbonero P. Barley BLZ2, a seed-specific bZIP protein that interacts with BLZ1 in vivo and activates transcription from the GCN4-like motif of B-hordein promoters in barley endosperm. J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274:9175–9182. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.14.9175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Onodera Y., Suzuki A., Wu C.Y., Washida H., Takaiwa F. A rice functional transcriptional activator, RISBZ1, responsible for endosperm-specific expression of storage protein genes through GCN4 motif. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:14139–14152. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M007405200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Vicente-Carbajosa J., Oñate L., Lara P., Diaz I., Carbonero P. Barley BLZ1: A bZIP transcriptional activator that interacts with endosperm-specific gene promoters. Plant J. 1998;13:629–640. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313x.1998.00068.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mueller S., Hilbert B., Dueckershoff K., Roitsch T., Krischke M., Mueller M.J., Berger S. General detoxification and stress responses are mediated by oxidized lipids through TGA transcription factors in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2008;20:768–785. doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.054809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zander M., La Camera S., Lamotte O., Métraux J.P., Gatz C. Arabidopsis thaliana class-II TGA transcription factors are essential activators of jasmonic acid/ethylene-induced defense responses. Plant J. 2010;61:200–210. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.04044.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Jin H., Choi S.M., Kang M.J., Yun S.H., Kwon D.J., Noh Y.S., Noh B. Salicylic acid-induced transcriptional reprogramming by the HAC-NPR1-TGA histone acetyltransferase complex in Arabidopsis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:11712–11725. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hussain R.M.F., Sheikh A.H., Haider I., Quareshy M., Linthorst H.J.M. Arabidopsis WRKY50 and TGA Transcription Factors Synergistically Activate Expression of PR1. Front. Plant Sci. 2018;9:930. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ndamukong I., Abdallat A.A., Thurow C., Fode B., Zander M., Weigel R., Gatz C. SA-inducible Arabidopsis glutaredoxin interacts with TGA factors and suppresses JA-responsive PDF1.2 transcription. Plant J. 2007;50:128–139. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03039.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Gachon F., Olela F.F., Schaad O., Descombes P., Schibler U. The circadian PAR-domain basic leucine zipper transcription factors DBP, TEF, and HLF modulate basal and inducible xenobiotic detoxification. Cell Metab. 2006;4:25–36. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Gibalová A., Reňák D., Matczuk K., Dupl’áková N., Cháb D., Twell D., Honys D. AtbZIP34 is required for Arabidopsis pollen wall patterning and the control of several metabolic pathways in developing pollen. Plant Mol. Biol. 2009;70:581–601. doi: 10.1007/s11103-009-9493-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Assunção A.G., Herrero E., Lin Y.F., Huettel B., Talukdar S., Smaczniak C., Immink R.G., van Eldik M., Fiers M., Schat H., et al. Arabidopsis thaliana transcription factors bZIP19 and bZIP23 regulate the adaptation to zinc deficiency. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:10296–10301. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1004788107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Inaba S., Kurata R., Kobayashi M., Yamagishi Y., Mori I., Ogata Y., Fukao Y. Identification of putative target genes of bZIP19, a transcription factor essential for Arabidopsis adaptation to Zn deficiency in roots. Plant J. 2015;84:323–334. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lopes-da-Silva M., McCormack J.J., Burden J.J., Harrison-Lavoie K.J., Ferraro F., Cutler D.F. A GBF1-Dependent Mechanism for Environmentally Responsive Regulation of ER-Golgi Transport. Dev. Cell. 2019;49:786–801.e786. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.04.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Giri M.K., Singh N., Banday Z.Z., Singh V., Ram H., Singh D., Chattopadhyay S., Nandi A.K. GBF1 differentially regulates CAT2 and PAD4 transcription to promote pathogen defense in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2017;91:802–815. doi: 10.1111/tpj.13608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Yang Y., Liang T., Zhang L., Shao K., Gu X., Shang R., Shi N., Li X., Zhang P., Liu H. UVR8 interacts with WRKY36 to regulate HY5 transcription and hypocotyl elongation in Arabidopsis. Nat. Plants. 2018;4:98–107. doi: 10.1038/s41477-017-0099-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Osterlund M.T., Hardtke C.S., Wei N., Deng X.W. Targeted destabilization of HY5 during light-regulated development of Arabidopsis. Nature. 2000;405:462–466. doi: 10.1038/35013076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Li J., Terzaghi W., Gong Y., Li C., Ling J.J., Fan Y., Qin N., Gong X., Zhu D., Deng X.W. Modulation of BIN2 kinase activity by HY5 controls hypocotyl elongation in the light. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:1592. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15394-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Tsugama D., Liu S., Takano T. Analysis of functions of VIP1 and its close homologs in osmosensory responses of Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e103930. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Tsugama D., Liu S., Fujino K., Takano T. Calcium signalling regulates the functions of the bZIP protein VIP1 in touch responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Ann. Bot. 2018;122:1219–1229. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcy125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Choi H., Hong J., Ha J., Kang J., Kim S.Y. ABFs, a family of ABA-responsive element binding factors. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:1723–1730. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.3.1723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Fukazawa J., Sakai T., Ishida S., Yamaguchi I., Kamiya Y., Takahashi Y. Repression of shoot growth, a bZIP transcriptional activator, regulates cell elongation by controlling the level of gibberellins. Plant Cell. 2000;12:901–915. doi: 10.1105/tpc.12.6.901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Izawa T., Foster R., Nakajima M., Shimamoto K., Chua N.H. The rice bZIP transcriptional activator RITA-1 is highly expressed during seed development. Plant Cell. 1994;6:1277–1287. doi: 10.1105/tpc.6.9.1277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.An P., Li X., Liu T., Shui Z., Chen M., Gao X., Wang Z. The Identification of Broomcorn Millet bZIP Transcription Factors, Which Regulate Growth and Development to Enhance Stress Tolerance and Seed Germination. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23:6448. doi: 10.3390/ijms23126448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Chen C., Chen H., Zhang Y., Thomas H.R., Frank M.H., He Y., Xia R. TBtools: An Integrative Toolkit Developed for Interactive Analyses of Big Biological Data. Mol. Plant. 2020;13:1194–1202. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2020.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Liu Z., Zhang M., Kong L., Lv Y., Zou M., Lu G., Cao J., Yu X. Genome-wide identification, phylogeny, duplication, and expression analyses of two-component system genes in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis) DNA Res. Int. J. Rapid Publ. Rep. Genes. Genomes. 2014;21:379–396. doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsu004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Krishnamurthy P., Hong J.K., Kim J.A., Jeong M.-J., Lee Y.-H., Lee S.I. Genome-wide analysis of the expansin gene superfamily reveals Brassica rapa-specific evolutionary dynamics upon whole genome triplication. Mol. Genet. Genom. MGG. 2015;290:521–530. doi: 10.1007/s00438-014-0935-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Barker M.S., Baute G.J., Liu S.L. Plant Genome Diversity. Volume 1. Springer; Vienna, Austria: 2012. Duplications and Turnover in Plant Genomes; pp. 155–169. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Zhang J. Evolution by gene duplication: An update. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2003;18:292–298. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00033-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Jacob A.G., Smith C.W.J. Intron retention as a component of regulated gene expression programs. Hum. Genet. 2017;136:1043–1057. doi: 10.1007/s00439-017-1791-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Wang W., Wang Y., Zhang S., Xie K., Zhang C., Xi Y., Sun F. Genome-wide analysis of the abiotic stress-related bZIP family in switchgrass. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2020;47:4439–4454. doi: 10.1007/s11033-020-05561-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Hu W., Wang L., Tie W., Yan Y., Ding Z., Liu J., Li M., Peng M., Xu B., Jin Z. Genome-wide analyses of the bZIP family reveal their involvement in the development, ripening and abiotic stress response in banana. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:30203. doi: 10.1038/srep30203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Yang S., Xu K., Chen S., Li T., Xia H., Chen L., Liu H., Luo L. A stress-responsive bZIP transcription factor OsbZIP62 improves drought and oxidative tolerance in rice. BMC Plant Biol. 2019;19:260. doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-1872-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Ma H., Liu C., Li Z., Ran Q., Xie G., Wang B., Fang S., Chu J., Zhang J. ZmbZIP4 Contributes to Stress Resistance in Maize by Regulating ABA Synthesis and Root Development. Plant Physiol. 2018;178:753–770. doi: 10.1104/pp.18.00436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Zhang M., Liu Y., Cai H., Guo M., Chai M., She Z., Ye L., Cheng Y., Wang B., Qin Y. The bZIP Transcription Factor GmbZIP15 Negatively Regulates Salt- and Drought-Stress Responses in Soybean. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:7778. doi: 10.3390/ijms21207778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Bi C., Yu Y., Dong C., Yang Y., Zhai Y., Du F., Xia C., Ni Z., Kong X., Zhang L. The bZIP transcription factor TabZIP15 improves salt stress tolerance in wheat. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2021;19:209–211. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Zhao P., Ye M., Wang R., Wang D., Chen Q. Systematic identification and functional analysis of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) bZIP transcription factors and overexpression of potato bZIP transcription factor StbZIP-65 enhances salt tolerance. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020;161:155–167. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.06.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.He Q., Cai H., Bai M., Zhang M., Chen F., Huang Y., Priyadarshani S.V.G.N., Chai M., Liu L., Liu Y., et al. A Soybean bZIP Transcription Factor Confers Multiple Biotic and Abiotic Stress Responses in Plant. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:4701. doi: 10.3390/ijms21134701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Cai W., Yang Y., Wang W., Guo G., Liu W., Bi C. Overexpression of a wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) bZIP transcription factor gene, TabZIP6, decreased the freezing tolerance of transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings by down-regulating the expression of CBFs. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018;124:100–111. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.


Articles from Genes are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES