Skip to main content
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1998 Aug 11;159(3):245–249.

The grammar of interpretive medicine

R Horton
PMCID: PMC1229559  PMID: 9724981

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (198.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Glasziou P. P., Irwig L. M. An evidence based approach to individualising treatment. BMJ. 1995 Nov 18;311(7016):1356–1359. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7016.1356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Horton R. A manifesto for reading medicine. Lancet. 1997 Mar 22;349(9055):872–874. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)02336-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Horton R. Prague: the birth of the reader. Lancet. 1997 Sep 27;350(9082):898–899. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)22039-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Horton R. The interpretive turn. Lancet. 1995 Jul 1;346(8966):3–3. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92644-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Horton R. The rhetoric of research. BMJ. 1995 Apr 15;310(6985):985–987. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6985.985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Horton R. The unstable medical research paper. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997 Sep;50(9):981–986. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00156-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Horton R. Why graduate medical schools make sense. Lancet. 1998 Mar 14;351(9105):826–828. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)02290-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lau J., Ioannidis J. P., Schmid C. H. Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough. Lancet. 1998 Jan 10;351(9096):123–127. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)08468-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Miettinen O. S. Evidence in medicine: invited commentary. CMAJ. 1998 Jan 27;158(2):215–221. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pogue J., Yusuf S. Overcoming the limitations of current meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 1998 Jan 3;351(9095):47–52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)08461-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rothwell P. M. Can overall results of clinical trials be applied to all patients? Lancet. 1995 Jun 24;345(8965):1616–1619. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90120-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Staessen J. A., Fagard R., Thijs L., Celis H., Arabidze G. G., Birkenhäger W. H., Bulpitt C. J., de Leeuw P. W., Dollery C. T., Fletcher A. E. Randomised double-blind comparison of placebo and active treatment for older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. The Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) Trial Investigators. Lancet. 1997 Sep 13;350(9080):757–764. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)05381-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sullivan F. M., MacNaughton R. J. Evidence in consultations: interpreted and individualised. Lancet. 1996 Oct 5;348(9032):941–943. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)05219-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES