Alcoholic liver disease (ALD) remains a pressing global health issue, exhibiting a wide spectrum of hepatic dysfunction progressing from uncomplicated steatosis to cirrhosis to hepatocellular carcinoma [1, 2]. In a recent issue of Digestive Diseases and Sciences, Zhang et al. employ bibliometric and data-mining strategies to offer a detailed map of current ALD research trends [3], enabling them to track high-impact articles, identify research hotspots, and incorporate molecular results into a more general framework of ALD etiology. Linking publishing data with gene-enrichment studies underscores how oxidative stress, immunological regulation, and the gut-liver axis have all become major topics guiding the course of ALD.
A notable strength of this bibliometric study lies in its capacity to identify evolving shifts in scientific interest, culminating in new directions for investigation. Early research often focused on alcohol metabolism, particularly how cytochrome P450 2E1 (CYP2E1), alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH), and aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) transformed ethanol into hepatotoxic intermediates such as acetaldehyde and reactive oxygen species (ROS) [4, 5]. More recent work, however, widens the lens to incorporate bacterial dysbiosis and disrupted intestinal permeability into ALD pathogenesis [6]. Zhang et al. synthesize these threads by pointing out that hepatic inflammation is intimately associated with direct oxidative insults and gut-derived endotoxins, underscoring the multifactorial nature of ALD.
Since the article emphasizes publication metrics and keyword co-occurrences, it also provides essential insight into the continuing debates about ALD progression. On the one hand, inflammatory responses mediated by Kupffer cells, neutrophils, and pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNFα, IL-6) remain central explanatory constructs in ALD studies [4, 7]. On the other, researchers increasingly recognize how intestinal microbiota compositional shifts—including reductions in putative beneficial genera such as Akkermansia—are associated with circulating endotoxins that hyperactivate the immune system [2, 6]. These processes are thought to eventually converge to form a self-perpetuating cycle of immune-mediated liver damage [8]. Therefore, the gut-liver axis emerges as an additional central theme in the article. Although the bibliometric methodology cannot fully resolve questions about causal primacy (whether ethanol metabolism triggers gut dysbiosis or vice versa), it underscores the complexity faced by investigators working on ALD.
Although Zhang et al. focus on literature mapping rather than elucidating translational advancements, prominent therapeutic trends arise. One emphasis pertains to establishing public health strategies aimed at mitigating excessive alcohol use, even though in abstinent individuals advanced alcoholic liver disease can proceed if oxidative damage and pro-fibrotic signals remain deregulated [1, 2]. Thus, Zhang et al. implicitly recommend a multipronged approach that may encompass antioxidant supplementation, immunomodulation, and deliberate reshaping of the gut flora. Precision medicine approaches have also attracted attention, with polymorphisms in ADH or ALDH identified as possible genetic risk factors for accelerated disease severity. Such findings reinforce the notion that epidemiological patterns should be integrated with molecular research to refine risk assessment.
Despite providing a robust overview, Zhang et al.’s paper might be strengthened by a more detailed discussion of translational bridges: how do these associations translate into targeted therapies? Although the authors briefly suggest potential antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, or microbiota-modulating interventions, they do not provide examples of ongoing trials or novel small-molecule inhibitors. Moreover, the article’s reliance solely on the Web of Science database may limit the comprehensiveness of its bibliometric analysis, potentially overlooking relevant studies indexed elsewhere. Furthermore, while the citation-based methodology effectively identifies influential publications, it may underrepresent recent high-impact research that has not yet accrued substantial citations or publications of such novelty that they are not initially highly cited. Despite these limitations, the article successfully captures the core aspects of ALD, providing valuable insights that can guide future research endeavors.
In sum, this research by Zhang et al., while it does not provide definitive conclusions, offers a structured and useful overview of how health and disease dynamics in ALD interrelate. By employing bibliometric and data-mining approaches, its authors delineate major mechanisms of ALD pathogenesis—most notably oxidative stress, ethanol metabolism, and gut-liver axis dysbiosis—and offer a broad synthesis of current evidence.
Nevertheless, looking ahead, many topics merit further investigation. Firstly, a clearer understanding of how genetic variants of ADH, ALDH, or other immune-regulatory genes influence disease progression can be used for risk stratification. Secondly, meticulously structured treatment programs, including antioxidants, targeted immunomodulators, and microbiome alterations may produce substantial advancements in arresting or reversing the progression of ALD. Ultimately, cross-population research incorporating real-time assessments of environmental exposure and dietary habits may help elucidate why specific patient subgroups progress more rapidly to cirrhosis or hepatocellular cancer.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, S.P.; writing—original draft preparation, S.P.; writing—review and editing, SC; visualization, S.P. and S.C.
Funding
None.
Data Availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Salvatore Pezzino and Sergio Castorina contributed equally to this work.
References
- 1.Gao B, Bataller R. Alcoholic liver disease: pathogenesis and new therapeutic targets. Gastroenterology 2011;141:1572–1585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Szabo G, Bala S. Alcoholic liver disease and the gut-liver axis. World J Gastroenterol 2010;16:1321–1329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zhang J, Yang Z, Liu X et al. New insights into the pathogenesis of alcoholic liver disease based on global research. Dig Dis Sci. 2025. 10.1007/s10620-024-08778-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Seitz HK, Neuman MG. The history of alcoholic liver disease: from an unrecognized disease to one of the most frequent diseases in hepatology. J Clin Med 2021;10:858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Leung T-M, Nieto N. CYP2E1 and oxidant stress in alcoholic and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol 2013;58:395–398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bajaj JS. Alcohol, liver disease and the gut microbiota. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019;16:235–246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hritz I, Mandrekar P, Velayudham A et al. The critical role of Toll-like Receptor (TLR) 4 in alcoholic liver disease is independent of MyD88. Hepatology 2008;48:1224–1231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pezzino S, Sofia M, Faletra G et al. Gut-liver axis and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a vicious circle. Biology 2022;11:1622. 10.3390/biology11111622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
