Abstract
Common mycorrhizal networks of ectomycorrhizal (EcM) fungi could be of great benefit to trees growing in the shallow soils of Sub-Mediterranean Karst ecosystems, potentially playing a crucial role in the survival of trees in this harsh environment. The first step to confirm the existence of such networks is to assess the extent and nature of symbiont sharing in the mycelial community. To address this question, we incubated in-growth mesh bags under the native Ostrya carpinifolia and Quercus pubescens, and the non-native Pinus nigra, over two consecutive years. In Q. pubescens and P. nigra, but not in O. carpinifolia, mycelium production was significantly higher in the year with higher spring precipitation, indicating the influence of climatic conditions, but also the identity of the host tree. We observed a complex interaction between tree species and sampling year in structuring the composition and diversity of mycelial communities. Local environmental conditions contributed additionally and were responsible for 21.46% of the community variation between samples. Although ~ 70% of fungal operational taxonomic units were shared across the studied tree species, distinct community compositions emerged, emphasizing the role of host tree specificity. Q. pubescens exhibited greater stability in EcM richness between sampling years, whereas P. nigra showed lower EcM richness, likely due to limited availability of compatible fungi and reliance on introduced fungal partners. Additionally, differences in EcM fungal exploration strategies were observed. O. carpinifolia and Q. pubescens mainly hosted non-specific EcM fungi with short distance exploration types. In contrast, EcM fungi of P. nigra had higher spatial spread, and were predominantly conifer specific. Overall, our results emphasize the importance of host specificity, soil parameters, spatial proximity, and climatic variability for the structuring of mycelial communities in fragmented forests.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00572-025-01220-9.
Keywords: Ectomycorrhizal fungi, Mesh bags, Exploration strategies, Hop-hornbeam, Pubescent oak, European black pine
Introduction
Soil fungi are involved in a wide range of ecosystem processes, such as the decomposition of organic matter, soil carbon (C) storage, and phosphorous (P) and nitrogen (N) cycling. On average, they represent between 55 to 89% of the total soil microbial biomass (Treseder and Lennon 2015). An important group of soil fungi in forest ecosystems are ectomycorrhizal (EcM) fungi, which form symbiotic associations with tree roots and obtain most of their carbon from their hosts, while delivering water and nutrients to plants (Lehto and Zwiazek 2011; Treseder and Lennon 2015; Bunn et al. 2024). The mycelium of EcM fungi contributes around 30% of soil microbial biomass (Högberg and Högberg 2002).
Mycelia of many EcM and saprotrophic fungi can spread vegetatively for considerable distances through soil (Klein and Paschke 2004; Cairney 2005), thereby taking up resources at the specific location and translocating them to other regions (Klein and Paschke 2004). Generally, most dominant EcM fungi occur in patches with diameter less than three meters (Lilleskov et al. 2004), but recorders may stretch across more than one hundred of meters (Fiore-Donno and Martin 2001; Molinier et al. 2016). Genets of saprotrophic basidiomycetes can cover several square metres to many hectares (Boddy et al. 2009). Certain species of EcM fungi can link individual plants of the same species or even hosts of distant lineages through extramatrical mycelium (EMM) (Anderson and Cairney 2007; Pickles and Simard 2017). These mycelial linkages, called common mycorrhizal networks may facilitate water and nutrient redistribution in drought-stressed ecosystems and promote the establishment of tree seedlings in these environments (Pickles and Simard 2017). The tendency to share symbionts with other plants may enlarge the biotic component of the plant niche (Taudiere et al. 2015). A high degree of symbiont sharing may facilitate seedling establishment, especially in environments where summer droughts decidedly affect the survival of seedlings (Taudiere et al. 2015). Moreover, benefits of common mycorrhizal networks are not exclusively limited to environments with periodic aridity, improved height growth and shoot biomass in seedlings with access to common mycorrhizal networks was also reported from humid environments (Cortese and Horton 2024). Recently, concerns have been raised regarding the overstatements of benefits of common mycelial networks, arguing that their ecological significance remains scientifically unproven (Karst et al. 2023; Irwin 2024). Therefore, further evidence is needed to confirm or reject whether the common mycorrhizal networks are widespread in forests. One of the first steps in this direction is to investigate whether different coexisting tree species share common EcM fungi in their EMM community.
The indeterminate filamentous nature of EcM fungi is a serious obstacle for the investigation of mycelia in the heterogeneous soil environment (Cairney 2005). The tiny and fragile nature of mycelia prevents their direct quantification and identification since they cannot be separated from soil or mycelium of other soil fungi (Anderson and Cairney 2007). This challenge led to the development of the mesh bag method (Wallander et al. 2001). Mesh bags are made of a fine mesh with size openings tiny enough to allow only the ingrowth of fungal mycelium while excluding roots. They are filled with acid washed silica sand to remove C sources and limit the colonisation of mesh bags only to EcM fungi (Wallander et al. 2001). However, recent studies have brought this assumption into question (Hagenbo et al. 2018; Fernandez 2021). Despite their drawbacks, mesh bags were successfully used in several C cycling studies (e.g. Hagenbo et al. 2017, 2018). On the other hand, next generation sequencing (NGS) approaches, such as metabarcoding, provide insight into the fungal community composition, but cannot always differentiate between active mycelium and dormant fungal structures, such as spores and sclerotia (Janowski and Leski 2023). Additionally, metabarcoding, a widely used NGS approach for fungal community studies, is semi-quantitative (Baldrian et al. 2013, Nguyen et al. 2015). Combination of both methods is used to taxonomically identify the mycelium that develops inside mesh bags (Kjøller 2006). Communities of EcM fungi when considered from the perspective of their mycelial systems in soil may be quite different from those identified on the colonized root tips (Anderson and Cairney 2007).
Locally, the composition of microbial communities in topsoil is determined by the spatial heterogeneity in terms of soil and litter chemistry (organic matter content, pH, the content of N and other nutrients), vegetation composition and activity (Baldrian 2017). EcM community composition is strongly affected by the host identity (Bogar and Kennedy 2013). More than 50% of EcM species is specific at certain taxonomic level (Tedersoo et al. 2024). These drivers are accompanied by stochastic effects on the assembly of the microbial community (Baldrian 2017). One of them is a priority effect (Kennedy et al. 2009), the timing and order of species arrival at the site, with coexistence, deterministic exclusion and history-dependent exclusion as possible outcomes (Song et al. 2021). The strength of priority effect may depend on the mode of colonization, with lower possibility to establish from spores due to restrained energy source contained in spores compared to common mycorrhizal networks where mycelial growth may be fuelled by the plant hosts (Johnson 2015).The community structure is also shaped by the dispersal ability of fungal spores which is limited by distance in EcM fungi (Lilleskov and Bruns 2005; Peay et al. 2012).
Different EcM fungi produce different amounts of EMM (Anderson and Cairney 2007). Exploration types of ectomycorrhizae were introduced to describe the extent of EMM produced in the form of emanating hyphae and rhizomorphs (i.e. aggregations of parallel-oriented hyphae) to increase the volume of exploited soil and colonize new roots (Agerer 2001). Contact exploration type is characterized by a smooth mantle and only a few emanating hyphae, while short-distance exploration type has numerous emanating hyphae that do not extend far from the root tip. The medium-distance exploration type features undifferentiated or slightly differentiated rhizomorphs, with the amount of emanating hyphae depending on the sub-type (fringe, mat, and smooth). Finally, the long-distance exploration type forms rather smooth ectomycorrhizae with few but highly differentiated rhizomorphs (Agerer 2001). However, recent findings suggest that exploration types of EcM fungi may not be good predictors of soil foraging (Jörgensen et al. 2023).
Our study focused on harsh Sub-Mediterranean Karst environment in Slovenia, which is characterized by shallow soils and frequent summer droughts. Common mycorrhizal networks of EcM fungi could greatly benefit trees growing in this environment due to the role that common mycorrhizal networks have in the redistribution of water (Egerton-Warburton et al. 2008). The patchy nature of woodland in this area allows to study the parameters, which are structuring the mycelial community composition at the local level, such as host identity, geographical distance and potential spatial spread of ectomycorrhizal fungi present as mycelia, thereby providing basic knowledge to support the further studies on the belowground connectivity in this ecosystem. The prevailing EcM hosts present in the Sub-Mediterranean Karst in Slovenia are pubescent oak, (Quercus pubescens Willd.), hop-hornbeam (Ostrya carpinifolia Scop.) and black pine (Pinus nigra Arnold). The non-native P. nigra was the only species for which the afforestation efforts in the past were successful in this area (Kranjc 2009) but is becoming less and less desired due to its high susceptibility to fire, different abiotic disturbances and insect infestations (Diaci et al. 2019).
A patchy secondary woodland ecosystem, which we selected for our study appears as separate groups of trees intermixed with meadows or pastures. Three before-mentioned tree species, which dominate separate groups of woody vegetation in the area, were investigated for their EMM communities in mesh bags for two subsequent years. Mesh bags were selected rather than bulk soil sequencing to differentiate the fungi present in mycelium forms from other fungi as mycelium can be easily separated from sand within mesh bags. To our knowledge, research on EcM communities of O. carpinifolia is very limited and focused mainly on Tuber cultivation (see Benucci et al. 2011; Baciarelli Falini et al. 2012; Moser et al. 2017). We hypothesized that the core EcM community in EMM would remain relatively stable between years but shifts in community composition may occur in response to interannual climatic variability. We hypothesized that tree species in the patchy woodland would share some EcM fungi in their EMM communities, with a higher degree of sharing expected between phylogenetically closer species (e.g. O. carpinifolia and Q. pubescens, both belonging to Fagales) compared to P. nigra. Finally, we expected that P. nigra would rely more on EcM fungi with higher spatial spread, given the growth habit of its root system, as its thicker fine roots may not penetrate tiny soil pores and therefore depend more heavily on EcM hyphae for nutrient and water uptake.
Materials and methods
Location and focal study species
The study was performed at Podgorski Kras (45.541714ºN, 13.916392ºE, 430 m a. s. l.), a karst region in SW Slovenia which is characterized by a Sub-Mediterranean climate. The maximum precipitation occurs in the fall and late spring, whereas the low precipitation periods occur in the transition from the winter to spring and in July/August (Ogrin 1996). The heterogeneous patchy woodland (meadows and pastures intermixed with groups of trees) present there originates from the abandonment of pastures in the area after WWII (Zorn et al. 2015). Spontaneous natural afforestation was dominated by the native tree species such as Quercus pubescens, Fraxinus ornus L. and Ostrya carpinifolia, along with the introduced Pinus nigra, which spread from nearby plantations established through past human intervention. Notably, O. carpinifolia primarily colonizes sites where dry stonewalls were historically constructed to clear rocks from agricultural land and protect it from wind erosion, particularly around sinkholes or between separate pasture plots. These sites are characterized by very shallow soils. Nine plots, three per tree species of interest, were selected (Figure S1). Each plot measured approximately 200 m2. Coordinates of the plots are given in Table S1.
Mesh bag preparation and exposure
To assess the EMM development in-situ, the in-growth mesh bag method was used (Wallander et al. 2001). The triangular mesh bags with sides of the triangle measuring a = b = 10 cm, and c = 14.5 cm were prepared from inox 304L woven metal cloth (Jutotissu Kft., Budapest, Hungary) with 50 µm wire diameter and pore openings of 46 µm diameter to allow only fungal hyphae ingrowth excluding plant roots (Figure S2a). Mesh bags were filled with 25 g of silicate sand of granulation 0.71–1.25 mm (Aquasil Filtersand, Quarzwerke, Melk, Austria) to achieve approximately 1 cm thickness of the mesh bag. The sand was first autoclaved, then washed with 2.5 M HCl to remove organic matter and subsequently with ultrapure water to remove any traces of added acid. The removal of organic matter was performed to eliminate a potential pre-existing nutrient source in the sand. Ingrowth mesh bags were inserted into the soil of the nine plots (three per tree species) in two series over the two subsequent years, first series from 28 March 2019 till 15 April 2020 (385 days) and the second from 17 June 2020 till 15 July 2021 (394 days). The exposure period of approximately one year was selected according to Hagenbo et al. (2018), suggesting that longer incubation times (around one year) counteract the initial disturbance effect and better reflect the EcM fungal community assembly in soil.
At each plot, we selected nine individuals of the representative tree species where mesh bags were installed approximately 0.5 m away from the tree stem. At each of the nine trees per plot, three replicates of mesh bags were installed to ensure enough mycelium for analyses. In total, 243 mesh bags (3 plots × 3 species × 9 individual trees × 3 mesh bags) were installed in each campaign. They were inserted into the soil at approximately 10–15 cm depth by lifting intact bulk soil with a small spade and placing it back over the bags to minimize the disturbance of the soil layers. Collected mesh bags were kept frozen at −20 °C until further processing. At the time of processing, mesh bags were thawed, opened, and the quantity of mycelium visually estimated (Figure S2b) using a scale adapted from Wallander et al. (2001) by applying six classes: 0—no mycelia present; 1—sparse mycelia present; 2—small amount of mycelium present; 3—mycelia present all-over, but no aggregation of the sand particles; 4—plenty of mycelia present and some aggregation of the sand particles; and 5—plenty of mycelia present and sand particles aggregated to a large extent. After that, sand with mycelium was mixed with distilled water from which the mycelium floating on water was picked out with tweezers and transferred into an Eppendorf tube. Additionally, sand was checked under the binocular microscope to collect the remaining mycelium. Mycelium from the three replicated mesh bags was pooled. The collected mycelium was freeze-dried, and homogenized using MillMix20 mixer mill (Domel, Železniki, Slovenia).
Meteorological conditions
Meteorological parameters for the observed period and 25-year period (1992–2017) were obtained from the Slovenian Environment Agency (meteo.arso.gov.si; accessed 19.1.2024). For precipitation, data were obtained from a nearby meteorological station Kozina (45.6042ºN, 13.9319ºE; 484 m a.s.l.), while air temperatures were extrapolated from other three closest meteorological stations (Portorož, Godnje and Postojna) as for Kozina no temperature measurements exist. Total cumulative precipitation amounted to 1484 mm and 1694 mm for the first and second campaign, respectively, while monthly precipitations in comparison to 25-year averages are presented in Figure S3. The 25-year average yearly precipitation for the area was 1299 mm and the average temperature was 11.8 °C. In the time of our study no summer drought typical for this area occurred.
Soil analyses
Soil samples were collected in the close vicinity of the mesh bag installation points. Due to the stony terrain, samples were collected with a knife from the top 10–15 cm of the soil profile. For each plot nine soil subsamples were collected, which were pooled into three composite samples per plot (joining three times three subsamples) for physical–chemical analyses. The labels of mesh bags, from the vicinity of which soil samples were collected and pooled, were recorded. We measured pH, total, mineral and organic C (Corg), total N, carbonates, extractable P, extractable K, Ca and Mg. The following standardized methods were used: SIST ISO 10390:2006: Soil quality—Determination of pH, SIST ISO 10694:1996: Soil quality—Determination of organic and total C after dry combustion (elementary analysis), SIST ISO 13878:1999: Soil quality—Determination of total nitrogen content by dry combustion ("elemental analysis"), SIST EN ISO 10693:2014: Soil quality—Determination of carbonate content—Volumetric method (ISO 10693:1995), SIST EN ISO 6878:2004: Water quality—Determination of phosphorus—Ammonium molybdate spectrometric method (ISO 6878:2004)—analogous for soil, SIST ISO 11466:1996: Soil quality—Extraction of trace elements soluble in aqua regia.
Molecular methods
To quantify the total fungal community, DNA was extracted from 250 mg of homogenized lyophilized mycelium using DNeasy Power Soil Pro kit (Qiagen, Venlo, Netherlands), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Fungal communities were quantified using Illumina MiSeq NGS sequencing of ITS2 region amplicons. To produce amplicon libraries for Illumina MiSeq NGS, the ITS2 fragment was first amplified by PCR using Q5® Hot Start High-Fidelity 2X Master Mix (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, Massachusetts, USA) and the primer pair ITS7f (Ihrmark et al. 2012) and ITS4r (White et al. 1990). Forward and reverse primers were modified to contain Illumina specific overhang adapter sequences. PCR was carried out in a 25 µl reaction volume with 2 µl of DNA template, 12.5 µl of Master Mix and 1.25 µM of each primer. PCR conditions were 98 °C for 30 s followed by 25 cycles at 98 °C for 10 s, 57 °C for 20 s and 72 °C for 20 s and final elongation at 72 °C for 2 min on an Applied Biosystems Veriti Thermal Cycler (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). PCR products were purified using Agencourt AMPure XP magnetic beads (Beckman Coulter, Brea, California, USA). Illumina sequencing adapters and multiplex indexes were attached using the Nextera XT Index Kit (Illumina, San Diego, California, USA) following Illumina’s recommended protocols. Secondary PCR products were purified using Agencourt AMPure XP magnetic beads, before quantification using a Quant-iT PicoGreen dsDNA Assay Kit (Invitrogen). Equimolar concentrations (4 nM) of successfully amplified samples were pooled, and the pooled library was quality checked with Agilent High Sensitivity DNA kit. Sequencing was performed on the Illumina MiSeq (2 × 300 cycles, 15% PhiX) at Faculty of Medicine of University of Maribor.
Bioinformatics
Primer sequences were trimmed from the raw sequence reads using cutadapt (Martin 2011), discarding any sequences with mismatches in the primer sequence (other than degenerate bases). Forward and reverse sequences were then quality filtered, trimmed, and pair-end aligned using fastp (Chen 2023). Briefly, sequences were discarded if more than 20% of bases had a quality score below Q30. A sliding-window approach was applied from the 5′ to 3′ direction, trimming bases when the average quality score within the window dropped below Q20. Only sequences longer than 40 nucleotides after trimming were retained for further analysis. Sequences passing the quality filtering and trimming steps were then pair-end aligned with a minimum detected overlap of 15 base pairs. We implemented an additional post-overlap length filter using Bash functions to retain sequences between 234 and 407 nucleotides in length (99.905% remained after length filtering based on the length distribution). We then concatenated sequences from all and dereplicated duplicate sequences with VSEARCH (Rognes et al. 2016). To remove flanking regions from the ITS2 gene region we used ITSx (Bengtsson-Palme et al. 2013), retaining only fungal ITS2 sequences. The remaining sequences were then denoised and clustered into OTUs at 97% similarity with VSEARCH. We used an OTU-based approach as there are multiple recognized issues with applying an amplicon sequence variant approach on ITS sequences (see Kauserud 2023). Centroid sequences were chimera checked, using the ‘uchime3’ algorithm implemented in VSEARCH, and sequences were then mapped to remaining centroids at 97% similarity to create an OTU table. Raw sequence data were deposited in SRA (BioProject PRJNA1243991).
Taxonomy was assigned to OTUs using a dual approach for maximum coverage. Taxonomy was first assigned using blast (Altschul et al. 1990) against the UNITE database (Abarenkov et al. 2024) release 10.0 2024–04-04 (all eukaryotes) containing only known genera with putative ecological assignment based on Põlme et al. (2021) assessed from SEED2 webpage (www.biomed.cas.cz/mbu/lbwrf/seed/). A second round of taxonomy assignment was performed with the CONSTAX2 (Liber et al. 2021) assignment method with the UNITE database. This approach derives a consensus taxonomy from BLAST, the RDP Naïve Bayesian classification algorithm, and the SINTAX classification algorithm. We carried out CONSTAX2 assignments with a confidence score of 0.7 for all three approaches, and an additional percentage identity cut-off of 0.9 for the BLAST approach. This was used to verify the initial BLAST assignments and manually curate the final dataset. OTUs were filtered from the dataset if they could not be assigned to the fungal kingdom through the ‘high level taxonomy’ assignment function of CONSTAX2. Where assignments were made to OTUs that were not captured through SEED2 BLAST annotation, the CONSTAX taxonomy was used, and functional annotations were updated based on prior ecological assignments of the genus where appropriate. Where a taxonomic rank was not able to be assigned at a given level, it was determined as ‘Unclassified’ for the purpose of taxa aggregation when appropriate. For analyses the data was split into three subsets covering the total fungal community, the EcM fungal community, and the saprotrophic fungal community.
Data analysis
All analyses and plot generation were carried out in R (v 4.3.1) implemented through Rstudio (v 2023.6.1).
Soil parameters (Figure S4) were analysed using linear models considering Species as the fixed variable to determine differences between soils associated with each tree species.
Mycelium production was analysed using a cumulative link model (CLM) in ordinal package to examine the effects of Year and Tree species x Year. The model was based on 398 observations, with 88 excluded due to missing data.
OTUs were aggregated into three major ecological guilds as previously described (EcM fungi, plant pathogens, soil saprotrophs, per Põlme et al. (2021)) for statistical analysis of the total relative abundances of each guild across tree species and year through ANOVA. For the EcM guild, we further considered the relative abundances of species and genera assigned to different exploration types, covering contact, short-distance (SD), medium-distance (MD) and long-distance (LD) exploration types (Agerer 2001, Agerer 2006, Tedersoo and Smith 2013, Suz et al. 2014, Agerer and Rambold 2004–2025).
Observed OTU richness and Shannon’s index of diversity (H’) were calculated using phyloseq (v1.44.0, McMurdie and Holmes 2013). Both variables were first tested for normality through a Shapiro-Wilkes test and analysed through ANOVA as they are robust to violations of normality particularly with large sample sizes. To determine whether rarefaction was necessary for downstream analyses we performed a correlation analysis between our observed OTU richness (t = 0.11, p = 0.91, r2 = 0.009) and H’ (t = −3.1, p = 0.002, r2 = 0.26) against sequencing depth. This was done for the total fungal community as the ectomycorrhizal subset is derivative of this and variation in the proportion of the community that is ectomycorrhizal would be confounded. While the correlation was significant between H’ and sequencing depth, the effect size of such was very weak and in fact negative rather than positive. Upon visual inspection this appears mostly driven by a biological effect stemming from 2021 samples having lower evenness in despite having higher sequencing depths than in 2020, rather than a technical issue associated with capture. We therefore believe it is prudent to maintain our data in a non-rarefied form per McMurdie and Holmes (2013).
To compare overall community dissimilarity, PERMANOVA analysis was performed with vegan using Bray–Curtis distances between samples. Overall community composition was also visualized through principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of the same Bray–Curtis distances.
Statistical analyses associated with microbiome data were conducted using one of two linear models tested through ANOVA (nlme) or PERMANOVA (vegan, v.2.6–4) analysis. The first model tested the contribution of tree species and year of collection on observed OTU richness, H’ and Bray–Curtis distances: [variable ~ tree species x year]. As differences between tree species may be either driven or even masked by within-species variation based on field location, a second model was constructed to more finely consider the plot that samples were collected from irrespective of species identity: [variable ~ plot x year]. Where significant main or interaction effects were seen (p < 0.05), post-hoc pairwise comparisons were carried out using the emmeans (ANOVA post-hoc) and pairwise adonis (v.0.4.1, PERMANOVA post-hoc) packages, with false discovery rate/Benjamini–Hochberg corrections for multiple testing.
We complemented our PCoA analyses with additional transformation-based redundancy analyses (tb-RDA) to determine how underlying soil properties and geographic distance between plots contributed to the community composition. Geographic distances were incorporated into the tb-RDA through the calculation of principal coordinates of neighbour matrices (PCNM) vectors. We further tested spatial variability between samples through Mantel correlations of Bray–Curtis distances and Euclidean spatial distances.
Indicator species analysis was implemented by the indicspecies package (v.1.7.14) at both the OTU and genus level. The number of shared and unique taxa were also visualized using upset plots (MicrobiotaProcess package v.1.12.4).
Results
Mycelium quantification
From the total number of mesh bags installed in the soil the recovery (Fig. 1) for the first campaign was 76.1%. The lowest recovery was for Q. pubescens, where 43.2% of bags were missing due to wild boar browsing, followed by 25.9% missing bags for P. nigra and 2.5% for O. carpinifolia. In the second campaign, the recovery of mesh bags improved to 87.7% of the total. At that time, 4.9% mesh bags were missing for Q. pubescens, and 16.0% for both P. nigra and O. carpinifolia. Considering all mesh bags, the most frequent visual estimations of mycelium quantity were 3 and 4 in both campaigns. The percentage of mesh bags with visual estimate 5 was higher in the second campaign (14.6% of all recovered mesh bags) compared to the first campaign (4.3% of all recovered mesh bags). Indeed, the mycelium quantity over all three species was significantly higher in 2021 (Estimate = + 2.591, p = 0.0010). However, the year 2021 was associated with a significant decrease in mycelium production relative to 2020 for O. carpinifolia (Estimate = − 0.637, p = 0.033). On the other hand, both P. nigra (Estimate = + 1.711, p < 0.001) and Q. pubescens (Estimate = + 1.994, p < 0.001) showed significant positive interactions with year 2021 suggesting increased mycelium production in 2021 relative to 2020.
Fig. 1.
Frequencies of visual estimates of EMM quantity for recovered mesh bags from the two campaigns (2020 and 2021), for all tree species together (all groups) and each tree species separately (Oc, O. carpinifolia; Pn, P. nigra; Qp, Q. pubescens)
Study-wide statistics of OTUs
After quality filtering and denoising 4,568,529 sequences were generated across 142 samples. Two samples with low sequencing depth (< 1000 sequences) were removed from the analysis. The remaining samples contained a minimum of 5,998 and maximum of 104,489 sequences (median 26,920). A total of 3425 OTUs with 97% cut-off were generated, of which 901 could be assigned a species level (36.89% of dataset total sequences), and 1987 could be assigned a genus level (76.63% of dataset total sequences). Of those that could not be assigned a species or genus, an additional 414 could be assigned a family-level identification (8.8% of dataset total sequences).
Functional groups of the mycelia-forming fungi colonizing mesh bags
There were 290 OTUs (representing 44.06% of sequences) classified as ‘EcM’ and 1277 OTUs (representing 21.06% of sequences) classified as exclusively ‘saprotrophic’. For 1215 OTUs (representing 23.5% of sequences) a putative function could not be assigned. The remaining 643 OTUs (23.5% of sequences) were assigned other putative functions including mixed saprobe-classifications, plant pathogens and other mycorrhizae (Fig. 2). Linear modelling revealed that the relative proportions of all OTUs belonging to the EcM, plant pathogen, and saprotroph guilds were highly variable between sampling years and across the associated tree species (Fig. 2, Table S4). The relative abundances of plant pathogens and EcM fungi were driven by an interaction between species and year. The relative abundance of plant pathogens increased between 2020 and 2021 for both O. carpinifolia and P. nigra but remained statistically consistent in Q. pubescens between years. The opposite relationship was seen in EcM fungi, where abundances decreased between 2020 and 2021 for O. carpinifolia and P. nigra, but again remained consistent between years in Q. pubescens. In 2020, EcM fungi were more abundant in O. carpinifolia than both other tree species. In 2021 however, EcM fungi were more abundant in Q. pubescens than both other tree species which was driven by between-year fluctuations in abundance for these two species against the relatively consistent abundances seen in Q. pubescens. For saprotrophic fungi, relative abundances were variable across tree species but were not informed by the interaction of the two variables. Saprotroph abundance was generally increased in 2021 relative to 2020, and post-hoc testing confirmed that saprotroph relative abundance was significantly higher in mycelial bags associated with P. nigra than O. carpinifolia, while Q. pubescens had intermediate abundances regardless of year.
Fig. 2.
Mean relative abundances of fungal functional groups inside mesh bags incubated beneath Ostrya carpinifolia (n(2020) = 26, n(2021) = 23), Pinus nigra (n(2020) = 23, n(2021) = 24) and Quercus pubescens (n(2020) = 19, n(2021) = 26) in 2020 and 2021. Number of replications (n) per year is given in brackets. Letters represent groupings of statistical similarity after p-value correction (fdr). For the saprotroph functional group lowercase letters represent between species groups, and uppercase letters denote that relative abundances are different between years regardless of plant species identity. For ectomycorrhizal and plant pathogen functional groups, letters are derived from species x year interactions
Exploration types of EcM fungi colonizing mesh bags
Across the whole experiment ectomycorrhiza associated with SD exploration were the most abundant (51.06 ± 2.97%), followed by LD (23.84 ± 2.81%), MD (23.27 ± 2.31%), and contact exploration types (1.82 ± 0.57%) in descending order (Fig. 3). The relative abundance of ectomycorrhiza belonging to the SD exploration type was different between tree species (Table S5), being generally less abundant in mesh bags associated with P. nigra (31.60% ± 4.71), than O. carpinifolia (65.80 ± 4.80%) and Q. pubescens (54.20 ± 4.62%). Across all three species, fungi with SD exploration decreased in relative abundance between 2020 and 2021 (Table S5). Fungi associated with the LD exploration type alternately increased in relative abundance between 2020 and 2021 (Table S5) but did not exhibit any species-specific associations (Table S5). The relative abundances of MD and contact exploration type fungi were driven by interactions between associated tree species and year (Table S5). Contact-associated fungi displayed small increases in relative abundance between 2020 and 2021 in mesh bags associated with P. nigra and O. carpinifolia and decreased in mesh bags associated with Q. pubescens. These associations however were not found to be statistically significant in pairwise comparisons after p-value correction, suggesting that while there may be a pattern it is too subtle and variable within species to make firm conclusions from. Fungi associated with MD exploration type were in greater relative abundance in mesh bags associated with P. nigra (2020: 45.80 ± 7.50, 2021: 28.0 ± 6.12) relative to those associated with O. carpinifolia (2020:11.0 ± 3.95; 2021:15.6 ± 4.12) and Q. pubescens (2020:17.3 ± 4.99,2021:23.2 ± 4.27) only in 2020. For relative abundances of subtypes of MD fungi see Figure S7.
Fig. 3.
Mean relative abundances of exploration types of EcM fungi detected in mycelial communities of mesh bags incubated beneath Ostrya carpinifolia (n(2020) = 26, n(2021) = 23), Pinus nigra (n(2020) = 23, n(2021) = 24) and Quercus pubescens (n(2020) = 19, n(2021) = 26) in 2020 and 2021. Exploration types are long-distance (LD), medium-distance (MD), short-distance (SD) and contact (C). Number of replications (n) per year is given in brackets. Letters represent groupings of statistical similarity after p-value correction (fdr). For the LD and SD exploration types, lowercase letters represent between species groups where appropriate, and uppercase letters denote that relative abundances are different between years regardless of plant species identity. For MD exploration type, letters are derived from species x year interactions. There are no letter groupings associated with C as there was no statistical support for such in post-hoc testing
Alpha diversity
The interaction effect of tree species and sampling year were significant determinants of observed OTU richness for total fungi and saprotrophic fungi, while the two parameters individually were associated with variation in the OTU richness of EcM fungi with no significant interaction (Table S6). The Shannon diversity of the total fungal community was significantly affected by the interaction between tree species and year and for saprotrophic fungi was significantly affected only by tree species. No significant variation in Shannon diversity was found for EcM fungi across tree species or year (Table S6).
In 2020 O. carpinifolia (mean richness = 408.85 ± 20.76; mean Shannon index = 2.51 ± 0.13) and P. nigra (mean richness = 379.65 ± 26.61; mean Shannon index = 2.63 ± 0.16) had significantly lower observed OTU richness and Shannon diversity index for total fungi than Q. pubescens (mean richness = 594.53 ± 40.31; mean Shannon index = 3.12 ± 0.16, Fig. 4, Table S6). However, in 2021 both alpha diversity metrics of O. carpinifolia (mean richness = 613.39 ± 39.04; mean Shannon index = 3.85 ± 0.18) and P. nigra (mean richness = 437.05 ± 35.92; mean Shannon index = 3.47 ± 0.21) increased and evened out with Q. pubescens (mean richness = 506.88 ± 27.19; mean Shannon index = 3.39 ± 0.18). For the EcM subset, the OTU richness was the lowest for P. nigra (mean richness P. nigra = 19.04 ± 1.10, O. carpinifolia = 27.98 ± 1.42, Q. pubescens = 28.11 ± 1.48, Fig. 4, Table S5), while no significant differences were observed in diversity. Recorded richness for the EcM subset was generally lower in 2021 (mean richness = 28.48 ± 1.23) compared to 2020 (mean richness = 21.92 ± 1.06, Table S6). Saprotroph subset followed the pattern for total fungi in terms of OTU richness, while diversity remained constant among both campaigns (Figure S5, Table S6).
Fig. 4.
Boxplots displaying the distribution of observed OTU richness and Shannon diversity index (H’) for total fungi and the EcM subset. Boxes cover the 25th-75th percentile of each group’s distribution, with the median represented as a thick bar within the boxes. Extending lines from the box denote the 1.5 interquartile range of the 25th and 75th percentile. Significantly different values (p < 0.05) are marked with different letters. Note the different scale for each subset. Replications per subset were as follows: O. carpinifolia (n(2020)= 26, n(2021)=23), P. nigra (n(2020)=23, n(2021)=24) and Q. pubescens (n(2020)= 19, n(2021)=26)
Beta diversity and community composition
The composition of both the total fungal community and EcM subset were found to be structured by the interaction between tree species and sampling year which explained 28.93% and 22.36% of between-sample variation respectively (Fig. 5). For both datasets, tree species contained consistently distinct community assemblies. For the total fungal community, all species and year combinations were distinct from one another whereas when considering the EcM subset, the community composition of fungi associated with Q. pubescens was consistent across both sampling years while those associated with O. carpinifolia and P. nigra were not (Fig. 5). There was also a significant degree of intra-specific variation in community assembly when considering sampling location (Table S7), though this explained only 7.99–9.91% of intra-species between-sample variation depending on tree species and dataset. The relative high importance of between-species variation over intra-species variation is demonstrated through Fig. 5 where the ordination reveals three well established groups that corresponded to tree species for the total fungal community rather than within-species plot location. For the EcM community, Q. pubescens associated fungi formed a clearly separate group from those associated with other tree species, while P. nigra and O. carpinifolia associated communities had a higher degree of overlap. One group of samples from P. nigra formed an isolated cluster, which was characterized by the predominance of Boletales (Figure S6) though there is no explanatory cause for this cluster from the experimental variables recorded.
Fig. 5.
PCoA of total and EcM fungal communities in mesh bags. Communities from different tree species and plots are marked with different colours (for locations of plots see Figure S1), while communities from different sampling campaigns are shown by different shapes. Letters next to Species x Year combinations represent groupings of statistical similarity after posthoc pairwise PERMANOVA analysis with fdr corrections
When incorporating environmental variables (inclusive of soil parameters and geographical distance through PCNM vectors) using tbRDA analysis, they were found to be explanatory of 21.46% and 20.65% of the variation in total fungal community composition and EcM fungal community composition, respectively. Both tbRDA models were statistically significant (p = 0.001), and every considered variable that was included in the model was significant in its contribution to variation in total fungal community assembly, though Ca and PCNM6 were not found to significantly contribute to EcM community assembly (Table S8), though it is important to consider that Ca and N are highly co-linear. There is a complex inter-correlated relationship between the spatial location of plots, soil properties, and the identity of associated tree species (Fig. 6). Complementary Mantel testing performed comparing between-sample Euclidean distances with Bray–Curtis distances confirms that spatial layout of the plots contributes significantly to between-sample variance, though this correlation was found to be weak (total fungi r2 = 0.19, EcM fungi r2 = 0.24). Extractable Mg separated total fungal communities of P. nigra from those associated with the other two tree species. Matching the observed underlying variability in soil properties between O. carpinifolia and the two other tree species (soils associated with O. carpinifolia were higher in pH, Corg, total N, extractable P and extractable Ca), soil pH, Corg, N and Ca content separated total fungal communities of O. carpinifolia from Q. pubescens and P. nigra. Soil Mg and K content separated the total fungal communities of P. nigra, O. carpinifolia and Q. pubescens. Extractable soil Mg and K separated EcM fungal communities associated with P. nigra from those associated with the other two tree species. Soil Corg, P, N and extractable Ca separated O. carpinifolia associated EcM communities from those of Q. pubescens and P. nigra. For soil parameters separated by plot location, see Figure S4 and Table S2.
Fig. 6.
Redundancy analysis (RDA) ordination plots showing the relationship between community structure, soil parameters and geographical distance. Each dot represents a mesh bag community coloured by tree species as shown in the legend. Arrows represent seven soil parameters: pH, Corg, total N, extractable P, Ca, Mg and K and geographical distance through PCNM vectors
Of the top 10 most abundant genera across the total fungal dataset, all but Trichoderma and Oidiodendron were EcM (Fig. 7). The most abundant genera in O. carpinifolia and Q. pubescens were Tomentella and Sebacina, in O. carpinifolia they were joined by Scleroderma and by Xerocomus in Q. pubescens. In P. nigra the most abundant in 2020 was Amphinema, followed by Tomentella and Suillus, while in 2021 Suillus was highly abundant, followed by Tomentella and Amphinema.
Fig. 7.
Taxa charts displaying the mean relative abundances of the ten most abundant genera for total fungi and EcM fungi observed colonizing mesh bags arranged by tree species and sampling campaign (i.e. year)
Shared and unique OTUs and genera associated with mesh bags across tree species
Among total fungi, 52.45% OTUs were shared by all three tree species, the percentage of shared OTUs that were associated with two tree species ranged between 5.05–12.30%, while 5.75–6.60% of OTUs were detected in only one tree species. Among the EcM fungal subset, 34.14% of OTUs were shared by all three tree species, 3.79–14.48% of OTUs were found with two species, while 10.69–13.45% of OTUs were specific for one tree species. The Q. pubescens-P. nigra pair exhibited lower numbers of shared OTUs compared to other two species pairs, both for total fungi and EcM fungi (Fig. 8). Across the 701 classified genera of total fungi and 44 classified genera of EcM fungi, 72.61% and 68.18% of genera were shared between all three tree species.
Fig. 8.
Shared and unique OTUs and genera for total fungi and EcM subset in mycelial communities of mesh bags
Indicator species analysis was performed considering only the total fungal community, as it would also reveal indicator genera within the EcM subset. In total, 40 indicator genera (Table S9) were identified across all tree species. EcM genera indicative of O. carpinifolia were Scleroderma (1 OTU, LD) and Hebeloma (1 OTU, SD). The Tomentella genus was associated with both Q. pubescens (9 OTUs) and O. carpinifolia (3 OTUs, SD). Q. pubescens was additionally associated with a mix of EcM fungi exhibiting varied exploration types including Byssocorticium (1 OTU, SD), Xerocomus (2 OTUs, LD), Hygrophorus (1 OUT, SD) and Amanita (1 OTU MD). P. nigra was associated mostly with EcM taxa associated with MD and LD exploration including Amphinema (3 OTUs, MD), Rhizopogon (1 OTU, LD), Suillus (1 OTU, LD), Polyozellus (1 OTU, MD), and Tricholoma (2 OTUs, MD). The remaining associated genera exhibiting a broad range of ecologies were individually associated with P. nigra (two plant pathogen genera, six saprotrophic genera), O. carpinifolia (one plant pathogen genus, five saprotrophic genera, two genera of unknown ecology) and Q. pubescens (two plant pathogen genera, seven saprotrophic genera, one genus of unknown ecology) and with multiple combinations of tree species (Table S9).
Discussion
In this study we investigated the variability in mycelium production, diversity and community composition of fungi from mesh bags beneath Ostrya carpinifolia, Quercus pubescens and Pinus nigra growing in Sub-Mediterranean Karst environment, in two consecutive years, where mesh bag incubation start and end differed in timing (spring vs. early summer). Additionally, EcM subset was characterized by the exploration types.
Our results indicate species-specific temporal trends in mycelium production. While O. carpinifolia showed a decline of mycelium quantity in bags retrieved in early summer 2021, both P. nigra and Q. pubescens responded positively, with significantly higher production levels in bags retrieved in early summer 2021. Although the cumulative precipitation was comparable between the two years, the distribution of precipitation was different, with the first year of mesh bag exposure experiencing relatively drier beginning of the year compared to the second year (see Figure S3). This aligns with the existing evidence indicating that the production of (EMM) mycelium is positively correlated to soil moisture (e.g. Söderström 1979; Castaño et al. 2017, Hagenbo et al. 2021), emphasizing the importance of precipitation patterns in regulating mycelial growth dynamics in forest ecosystems. In addition, specific adaptations of tree species to soil moisture limitations (Hagenbo et al. 2018) and seasonality of maximum carbon flow belowground (Štursova et al. 2020) may also govern the mycelium production and should be considered as possible reasons for the differences that we observed.
Although mesh bags were designed to selectively include only EcM fungi by intentional removal of organic C sources (Wallander et al. 2001), other fungal guilds were also detected. According to Hagenbo et al. (2018), the distribution between the functional groups in mesh bags incubated for approximately one year tends to reflect that of the surrounding soil. During this period, some mortality of EMM of EcM fungi could have occurred as the estimated mycelium longevity in Mediterranean forests ranges between 37–55 days (Hagenbo et al. 2021), which is substantially shorter than the mesh bag exposure time in our study. In addition, a process of adsorption of natural organic matter on sand quartz particles (Jada et al. 2006) through percolation and in the form of hyphal exudates might have occurred which could serve as a food for decomposer fungi. Other inputs of fungal material could be by spores shedding from sporocarps (Koide et al. 2005) into topsoil. Moreover, wild boar activity, which frequently disturbs the topsoil at the site, likely facilitated the mixing of fungal material from the surface into deeper soil layers, affecting the observed fungal diversity in the mesh bags. Despite these shortcomings, mesh bags filter taxa that can form EMM and thus represent an advantage compared to bulk soil analyses where mycelium-forming fungi cannot be separated from dormant fungi.
In 2021, the proportion of EcM fungi in mesh bags declined compared to 2020. However, this difference was significant only for O. carpinifolia. The difference in recovery timing of mesh bags between the two sampling campaigns (April for the first campaign and July for the second campaign) likely influenced these results, as EcM mycelium production is known to exhibit seasonal variability. A seasonality of mycelium production was reported for boreal and temperate forests (Wallander et al. 2001, Štursova et al. 2020). In Mediterranean, two peaks of EcM mycelium production were detected, first in October–November and the second at the end of February, while for summer months no data were provided (Hagenbo et al. 2021). In the second campaign the peak of EcM mycelium biomass might have been missed, potentially allowing ingrowth of saprotrophic mycelium at available niche. This shift is consistent with the higher relative abundance of saprotrophs in the mesh bags during second campaign. This pattern is further reflected in the OTU richness, where EcM fungal richness was generally lower in bags retrieved in early summer 2021 compared to bags retrieved in spring 2020. Conversely, total fungal OTU richness increased in bags retrieved in early summer 2021, particularly for O. carpinifolia and P. nigra, driven primarily by the proliferation of saprotrophic fungi. The question whether EcM fungi and saprotrophic fungi have different seasonal dynamics was already raised by Ekblad et al. (2013), but at that time the ecology of the many fungal taxa was unknown. Sequential colonisation might be a result of competitive or antagonistic interactions that occur between EcM fungi and saprotrophs, where EcM fungi might exert negative effects on decomposition (Leake et al. 2002; Cairney 2005).
Contrary to our expectations, P. nigra exhibited the lowest observed EcM OTU richness despite having thick roots that may struggle to access tiny soil niches, thus increasing its dependence on EcM fungi. The only EcM conifer in the area is a non-native P. nigra, introduced in the 19th century. Since no native EcM conifers grow in the vicinity to serve as a direct inoculum source for conifer-specific EcM fungi, P. nigra might had limited access to more diverse fungal community. The introduction of tree species into new areas often leads to substantial reduction of EcM species richness (Vlk et al. 2020). Introduced Pinaceae almost exclusively form symbiosis with co-introduced EcM in regions where no native Pinaceae are present (Vlk et al. 2020). However, in some cases, Pinaceae are able to form EcM associations with native EcM fungi present at the site of introduction, such as Sebacina and Thelephoraceae (Vlk et al. 2020). Although P. nigra was introduced, all three species at our site shared around 70% of EcM and total fungal OTUs in mesh bags. Interestingly, P. nigra and Q. pubescens shared fewer EcM OTUs than P. nigra and O. carpinifolia, a pattern also observed for the total fungi. This could partly be explained by the lower proximity of some sampling sites for P. nigra and O. carpinifolia compared to P. nigra and Q. pubescens. However, since Q. pubescens and O. carpinifolia sites were also distant from each other yet shared higher number of OTUs compared to P. nigra and Q. pubescens pair, spatial distance alone does not fully account for these findings. Therefore, we can only partly confirm our hypothesis that Q. pubescens and O. carpinifolia would share a higher number of OTUs in mycelial communities compared to the pairs of both broadleaved species with conifer.
Despite high proportion of shared OTUs, all investigated tree species had relatively distinct mycelial communities of total fungi. However, differences were less pronounced for EcM mycelia, especially between P. nigra and O. carpinifolia, which clustered together. This pattern may be attributed to the spatial proximity of two P. nigra sampling locations to one O. carpinifolia location suggesting that the spatial component plays a significant role in shaping EcM mycelial communities, whereas it appears to have less influence on the composition of other fungal mycelia. As a result, trees in closer proximity have a higher likelihood of sharing EcM mycelial communities, which in turn facilitates the formation of mycorrhizal networks. Our previous observations from ECM root tip and EMM of Q. pubescens in this area revealed substantial dissimilarities in the community composition of EcM fungi among the plots (Mrak et al. 2021, 2025). Apparently, the fragmented nature of forest in the area prevents mycelium to overcome the distances between the fragments, while the input from other inoculation sources appears to be largely stochastic. This indicates an island effect (Peay et al. 2010), where priority is an important determinant of EcM community structure.
In EMM communities of all tree hosts, Tomentella was one of the most dominant components. Tomentella is one of the most common EcM genera in forests worldwide (Jakucs and Eros-Honti 2008) and was also one of the most abundant and species rich taxa in the investigated area on Q. pubescens roots (Mrak et al. 2021, 2025). Similarly, in our previous study in this area, Tomentella was also the most dominant component of mesh-bag mycelia of Q. pubescens, along with Sebacina and Pseudotomentella (Mrak et al. 2021). Although different Tomentella species may classify under contact, SD or MD exploration types (Agerer 2001), SD morphotypes are predominantly observed on tree roots of Q. pubescens in this area (Mrak et al. 2025). However, this apparent limitation in exploration strategy does not prevent Tomentella from being a dominant component of mycelia in mesh bags. Notably, many EcM genera that are typically considered to produce low amount of EMM based on their exploration type can still extensively colonise mesh bags (Jörgensen et al. 2023). The relative abundance of mycelia from different genera in mesh bags also reflects differences in mycelial turnover rates (Jörgensen et al. 2023). Longer exposure periods may favour taxa with slower turnover rates, leading to increased detection over time. For example, rhizomorphs tend to be more long-lived than solitary emanating hyphae (Ekblad et al. 2013) which may result in higher abundances of rhizomorph-forming taxa after longer mesh bag exposure times. Furthermore, caution should be used when interpreting taxon abundance using PCR amplification of fungal rDNA due to high level of variation in the ITS copy numbers among fungal taxa (Baldrian et al. 2013).
Surprisingly, despite their high frequency and abundance on Q. pubescens root tips of in this area—as confirmed by our temporal studies in 2016–2018 and 2021–2022 (Mrak et al. 2021, 2025)—Cenococcum and Pyronemataceae (Genea, Humaria) were either absent or poorly represented in mesh bags, despite the fact that they belong to SD exploration types, similarly as Tomentella. Nevertheless, we detected many saprotrophic Dothideomycetes (Ascomycota), where Cenococcum is the only known EcM representative, as well as Cenococcum was reported from mesh bags by Hagenbo et al. (2018). This suggests that ecological factors may have contributed to the lower representation of certain Ascomycota taxa in the mesh bags.
Among EcM indicators genera, Amphinema, Rhizopogon and Suillus were almost exclusively found in mesh bags under P. nigra. These genera are highly specialized EcM fungi that predominantly associate with Pinaceae (Dahlberg and Finlay 1999; Erland and Taylor 1999; Molina et al. 1999; Bruns et al. 2002; Tedersoo et al. 2024). However, smaller amounts of Suillus and Amphinema mycelia were also detected in mesh bags under O. carpinifolia, which could be explained by the proximity of some P. nigra trees to our sampling plots for O. carpinifolia. Since Suillus is specific for Pinaceae (Dahlberg and Finlay 1999; Tedersoo et al. 2024), its presence below O. carpinifolia trees suggests potential competition between the mycelial communities of O. carpinifolia and P. nigra for the uptake of water and nutrients. Suillus, Amphinema and Rhizopogon all produce abundant mycelia and are classified as MD and LD exploration types (Agerer 2001), enabling them to efficiently absorb and transport water and nutrients from the parts of soil several decimetres away from the tree roots (Agerer 2001), thus indicating higher spatial spread of EMM of P. nigra. These fungi could be very beneficial for the absorption of water and nutrients in P. nigra due to its thick roots. However, studies have shown that despite forming abundant mycelia, Suillus and Rhizopogon exhibit relatively low levels of actual colonization of tree roots (Bruns et al. 2002). Therefore, we should be careful about the conclusions on the benefits that these fungi may bring as they may be more resource consuming for the tree host due to their specialized nature (Bruns et al. 2002). Indicator EcM fungi of O. carpinifolia and Q. pubescens in our study are all known to associate with a wide array of different hosts, including Pinus (Brand 1989; Kottke et al. 1998; Tedersoo et al. 2024). Xerocomus, an indicator of Q. pubescens in our study, is classified as LD exploration type EcM fungus (Agerer 2001), but despite its ability to form large genets with approximately 100 m in diameter (Fiore-Donno and Martin 2001), its mycelia did not occur under P. nigra and O. carpinifolia. This could be due to the fragmented nature of forest in this area, which is interspersed with meadows and pastures. Spreading over meadows does not bring any benefit to EcM fungus as no suitable hosts are found there.
Only two non-ectomycorrhizal genera were detected among ten most abundant genera of total fungi, Oidiodendron and Trichoderma, both forming filamentous mycelia (Põlme et al. 2021). Oidiodendron was assigned to the soil saprotroph functional group but may also occur as an ericoid mycorrhizal fungus (Martino et al. 2018). Trichoderma was co-assigned to the mycoparasite and foliar endophyte functional groups (Põlme et al. 2021). In addition, it was also reported to grow on roots and infect outer root cells, where it induces plant defence responses (Harman et al. 2004). This is resulting in host resistance to plant pests, tolerance to abiotic stresses, increased plant growth and photosynthetic capability, and contributes towards the solubilization of nutrients (Harman et al. 2004; del Carmen et al. 2021). Some endophytes may continue their life cycles as saprotrophs, thereby contributing significantly to the first stages of litter decomposition (Saikkonen et al. 2015), which explains why Trichoderma was often considered as a soil saprotroph (del Carmen et al. 2021).
There were also quite a few saprotrophs among indicator genera, mainly belonging to wood saprotrophs, which could be associated with the specific wood qualities of all three species, particularly the presence of resin in P. nigra. Sarea, an indicator genus of P. nigra, is a resinicolous fungus, found only in Pinaceae (Mitchell et al. 2021). Similarly, Lophium species are mainly reported from conifers and may also grow on resin (Czachura and Janik 2024). Some species of Gymnopus, another indicator genus of Pinus, are fruiting on pine needles (Petersen and Hughes 2016). All three genera form filamentous mycelia (Põlme et al. 2021).
Soil properties and spatial distance determined around 20% variation in the communities of the total fungal mycelium and EcM mycelium developed in the mesh bags despite the relatively small spatial scale of the study, where generally no big variations in soil characteristics were encountered. The topsoils under Q. pubescens and P. nigra were relatively similar, but O. carpinifolia showed higher values of pH, Corg, N and extractable Ca, which were discriminatory in separating its community from the other two species. As O. carpinifolia grows on remnants of drywalls, constructed of limestone, higher extractable Ca levels, which are normally associated with higher pH values (Monfort-Salvador et al. 2015), are reasonable. Experiments with liming have revealed significant changes in EcM communities and identified liming as a major determinant of EcM community structure, even stronger than the host species (Rineau and Garbaye 2009). On the other hand, during our fieldwork we noticed large accumulations of leaf litter and humus under O. carpinifolia, which is consistent with higher Corg and N levels observed for soil associated with this tree species. Moreover, exchangeable Ca was identified as a key factor controlling soil C and N following agricultural abandonment in Chinese karst by improving soil organic matter stability (Li et al. 2017). Both, Corg and N are very important in structuring the soil fungal communities (Chen et al. 2021; Qi et al. 2021). Based on these observations, for O. carpinifolia we cannot separate the effects of tree identity from the effects of soil properties on the community composition of total fungi and the EcM subset.
Host tree species is an important determinant of the relative abundance of exploration types (Rosinger et al. 2018; Fernandez et al. 2023) and our observations confirm this co-dependence. The high abundance of SD exploration types in EMM of Q. pubescens was consistent with our previous observations on exploration types of root-tip associated ECM communities of Q. pubescens in this area, determined by the combination of morphotyping and molecular methods (Mrak et al. 2021). However, for the other two tree species no prior data on the abundance of exploration types or EcM community composition were available from this area. For O. carpinifolia generally, the knowledge on EcM fungal communities is limited to Tuber cultivation (Benucci et al. 2011; Baciarelli Falini et al. 2012; Moser et al. 2017), while the study by Fernandez et al. (2023), which investigated the exploration types in some Pinus species was performed in temperate climate but included the effects of reduced soil moisture and increased temperature. In their study, Pinus strobus was associated with higher abundance of MD-LD distance exploration types in EMM, mainly Suillus, which is consisted with our findings. The higher abundance of exploration types with higher spatial spread in P. nigra could be related to the relative thickness of P. nigra fine roots compared to both broad-leaved species in our study (Chen et al. 2018). Thicker roots have limited access to tiny soil pores to forage for water and nutrients, making fungal hyphae and rhizomorphs essential for resource acquisition (Chen et al. 2016). Long distance exploration types are associated with higher C costs for their formation (Rosinger et al. 2018) but they tend to be longer-living and may accumulate substantial biomass over time (Jörgensen et al. 2023).
Interannual variability in the share of exploration types was also observed, which could be explained by the variability in meteorological conditions (Rosinger et al. 2018; Mrak et al. 2021; Fernandez et al. 2023). Previously studies on the root-tip community of ECM fungi of Q. pubescens in this ecosystem identified a negative correlation of SD exploration type with precipitation, positive correlation of LD exploration type with precipitation, and negative correlations of MD exploration type with soil temperature and air humidity (Mrak et al. 2021). Spring 2021 had more precipitation compared to spring 2020, which could be associated with higher share of LD and lower share of SD exploration types in mycelial communities of all three host species in 2021. This suggests that annual climatic variability plays a role in shaping the composition and functional strategies of EcM mycelial communities.
Conclusions
Our study highlights the complex interactions between host tree species, and environmental factors in shaping mycelial communities in a Sub-Mediterranean Karst environment. Despite the high proportion of shared fungal OTUs among tree species, mycelial communities remained relatively distinct. Distinct soil properties associated with O. carpinifolia prevented the separation of host effect from the effect of soil properties, while this was possible for P. nigra and Q. pubescens. Tree host identity and interannual fluctuations possibly related to seasonal effects and/or precipitation patterns particularly affected the mycelium production and balance between short- and long-distance exploration types. P. nigra exhibited unexpectedly low EcM OTU richness, likely due to its non-native status and lack of compatible inoculum sources. The presence of saprotrophic fungi in EcM mesh bags suggests secondary colonization, driven by decomposition dynamics and potential competitive interactions between EcM fungi and saprotrophs. Overall, our findings emphasize the importance of host specificity, soil properties, spatial proximity, and climatic variability in structuring mycelial communities in fragmented forests. Further research is needed to clarify the mechanisms underlying competitive interactions between fungal guilds and their impact on nutrient cycling and tree health.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank D. Cigale for separation of mycelium from the mesh bags, personnel of the molecular laboratory at Slovenian Forestry Institute for technical assistance in obtaining molecular data and N. Dovč for the preparation of the map provided in Supplementary Materials. D. Žlindra is acknowledged for the analysis of soil samples.
Author contribution
T.M., N.Š., J.G. and H.K. study conception and design, T.M. and N.Š. field work, N.Š. lab work, P.A.B.-C., N.Š., Tij.M., and T.M. data analysis, H.K. and J.G. funding acquisition, T.M., N.Š., P.A.B.-C., Tij.M. manuscript preparation, all authors manuscript revision.
Funding
The authors acknowledge the financial support from the Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency (research core fundings No. P4-0107 Forest biology, ecology and technology, P4‐0430 Forest-wood value chain and climate change: transition to circular bioeconomy, and research project J4-9297 The agreement and synchrony between woody carbon sequestration and eddy covariance estimates of net ecosystem productivity in a heterogeneous open woodland ecosystem).
Data availability
Data and metadata supporting the findings of this study are available via DiRROS repository (10.20315/Data.0004). Raw sequence data were deposited in SRA (BioProject PRJNA1243991).
Declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- Abarenkov K, Nilsson RH, Larsson KH, Taylor AFS, May TW, Frøslev TG, Pawlowska J, Lindahl B, Põldmaa K, Truong C, Vu D, Hosoya T, Niskanen T, Piirmann T, Ivanov F, Zirk A, Peterson M, Cheeke TE, Ishigami Y, Jansson AT, Jeppesen TS, Kristiansson E, Mikryukov V, Miller JT, Oono R, Ossandon FJ, Paupério J, Saar I, Schigel D, Suija A, Tedersoo L, Kõljalg U (2024) The UNITE database for molecular identification and taxonomic communication of fungi and other eukaryotes: sequences, taxa and classifications reconsidered. Nucleic Acids Res 52:D791–D797. 10.1093/NAR/GKAD1039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Agerer R (2001) Exploration types of ectomycorrhizae. Mycorrhiza 11:107–114. 10.1007/s005720100108 [Google Scholar]
- Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410. 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anderson IC, Cairney JW (2007) Ectomycorrhizal fungi: exploring the mycelial frontier. FEMS Microbiol Rev 31(4):388–406. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2007.00073.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baciarelli Falini L, Benucci GMN, Bencivenga M, Donnini D (2012) Mycorrhization level in truffle plants and presence of concurrent fungi. Acta Mycol 47(2):169–173 [Google Scholar]
- Baldrian P (2017) Forest microbiome: diversity, complexity and dynamics. FEMS Microbiol Rev 41(2):109–130. 10.1093/femsre/fuw040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baldrian P, Větrovský T, Cajthaml T, Dobiášová P, Petránková M, Šnajdr J, Eichlerová I (2013) Estimation of fungal biomass in forest litter and soil. Fungal Ecol 6(1):1–11. 10.1016/j.funeco.2012.10.002 [Google Scholar]
- Bengtsson-Palme J, Ryberg M, Hartmann M, Branco S, Wang Z, Godhe A, De Wit P, Sánchez-García M, Ebersberger I, de Sousa F, Amend A, Jumpponen A, Unterseher M, Kristiansson E, Abarenkov K, Bertrand YJK, Sanli K, Eriksson KM, Vik U, Veldre V, Nilsson RH (2013) Improved software detection and extraction of ITS1 and ITS2 from ribosomal ITS sequences of fungi and other eukaryotes for analysis of environmental sequencing data. Methods Ecol Evol 4:914–919. 10.1111/2041-210X.12073 [Google Scholar]
- Benucci GMN, Raggi L, Albertini E, Grebenc T, Bencivenga M, Falcinelli M, Di Massimo G (2011) Ectomycorrhizal communities in a productive Tuber aestivum Vittad. orchard: composition, host influence and species replacement. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 76(1):170–184. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.01039.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boddy L, Hynes J, Bebber DP, Fricker MD (2009) Saprotrophic cord systems: dispersal mechanisms in space and time. Mycoscience 50(1):9–19. 10.1007/S10267-008-0450-4 [Google Scholar]
- Bogar LM, Kennedy PG (2013) New wrinkles in an old paradigm: neighborhood effects can modify the structure and specificity of Alnus-associated ectomycorrhizal fungal communities. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 83:767–777. 10.1111/1574-6941.12032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brand F (1989) Xerocomus chrysenteron. In: Agerer R (ed) Colour Atlas of Ectomycorrhizae, plate 34, Einhorn-Verlag, Schwäbisch Gmünd
- Bruns TD, Bidartondo MI, Taylor DL (2002) Host specificity in Ectomycorrhizal Communities: what do the exceptions tell us? Integr Comp Biol 42(2):352–359. 10.1093/icb/42.2.352 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bunn RA, Corrêa A, Joshi J, Kaiser C, Lekberg Y, Prescott CE, Sala A, Karst J (2024) What determines transfer of carbon from plants to mycorrhizal fungi? New Phytol 244:1199–1215. 10.1111/nph.20145 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cairney JW (2005) Basidiomycete mycelia in forest soils: dimensions, dynamics and roles in nutrient distribution. Mycol Res 109(Pt 1):7–20. 10.1017/s0953756204001753 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Castaño C, Alday JG, Parladé J, Pera J, Martínez de Aragón J, Bonet JA (2017) Seasonal dynamics of the ectomycorrhizal fungus Lactarius vinosus are altered by changes in soil moisture and temperature. Soil Biol Biochem 115:253–260. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.08.021 [Google Scholar]
- Chen W, Koide RT, Adams TS, DeForest JL, Cheng L, Eissenstat DM (2016) Root morphology and mycorrhizal symbioses together shape nutrient foraging strategies of temperate trees. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113(31):8741–8746. 10.1073/pnas.1601006113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen W, Eissenstat DM, Koide RT (2018) Root diameter predicts the extramatrical hyphal exploration distance of the ectomycorrhizal fungal community. Ecosphere 9(4):e02202. 10.1002/ecs2.2202 [Google Scholar]
- Chen Y, Xu T, Fu W, Hu Y, Hu H, You L, Chen B (2021) Soil organic carbon and total nitrogen predict large-scale distribution of soil fungal communities in temperate and alpine shrub ecosystems. Eur J Soil Biol 102:103270. 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2020.103270 [Google Scholar]
- Chen S (2023) Ultrafast one-pass FASTQ data preprocessing, quality control, and deduplication using fastp. iMeta 2. 10.1002/IMT2.107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Cortese A, Horton T (2024) Ectomycorrhizal tree islands in arbuscular mycorrhizal forests: hotspots of fungal inoculum important for seedling establishment of historically dominant trees. J Ecol 112:2680–2694. 10.1111/1365-2745.14417 [Google Scholar]
- Czachura P, Janik P (2024) Lophium arboricola (Mytilinidiales, Ascomycota) from conifer resins. Plant Fungal Syst 69(1):1–6. 10.35535/pfsyst-2024-0001 [Google Scholar]
- Dahlberg A, Finlay RD (1999) Suillus. In: Cairney JWG, Chambers SM (eds) Ectomycorrhizal fungi key genera in profile, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 10.1007/978-3-662-06827-4_2
- del Carmen H, Rodríguez M, Evans HC, de Abreu LM et al (2021) New species and records of Trichoderma isolated as mycoparasites and endophytes from cultivated and wild coffee in Africa. Sci Rep 11:5671. 10.1038/s41598-021-84111-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Diaci J, Adamič T, Rozman A, Fidej G, Roženbergar D (2019) Conversion of Pinus nigra plantations with natural regeneration in the Slovenian Karst: the importance of intermediate, gradually formed canopy gaps. Forests 10(12):1136. 10.3390/f10121136 [Google Scholar]
- Egerton-Warburton LM, Querejeta JI, Allen MF (2008) Efflux of hydraulically lifted water from mycorrhizal fungal hyphae during imposed drought. Plant Signal Behav 3(1):68–71. 10.4161/psb.3.1.4924 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Ekblad A, Wallander H, Godbold DL et al (2013) The production and turnover of extramatrical mycelium of ectomycorrhizal fungi in forest soils: role in carbon cycling. Plant Soil 366:1–27. 10.1007/s11104-013-1630-3 [Google Scholar]
- Erland S, Taylor AFS (1999) Resupinate ectomycorrhizal fungal genera. In: Cairney JWG, Chambers SM (eds) Ectomycorrhizal Fungi Key Genera in Profile, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 10.1007/978-3-662-06827-4_15
- Fernandez CW (2021) The advancing mycelial frontier of ectomycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol 230:1296–1299. 10.1111/nph.17281 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fernandez CW, Mielke L, Stefanski A, Bermudez R, Hobbie SE, Montgomery RA, Reich PB, Kennedy PG (2023) Climate change–induced stress disrupts ectomycorrhizal interaction networks at the boreal–temperate ecotone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 120(34):e2221619120. 10.1073/pnas.2221619120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fiore-Donno A-M, Martin F (2001) Populations of ectomycorrhizal Laccaria amethystina and Xerocomus spp. show contrasting colonization patterns in a mixed forest. New Phytol 152:533–542. 10.1046/j.0028-646X.2001.00271.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hagenbo A, Clemmensen KE, Finlay RD, Kyaschenko J, Lindahl BD, Fransson P, Ekblad A (2017) Changes in turnover rather than production regulate biomass of ectomycorrhizal fungal mycelium across a Pinus sylvestris chronosequence. New Phytol 214:424–431. 10.1111/nph.14379 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hagenbo A, Kyaschenko J, Clemmensen KE, Lindahl BD, Fransson P (2018) Fungal community shifts underpin declining mycelial production and turnover across a Pinus sylvestris chronosequence. J Ecol 106:490–501. 10.1111/1365-2745.12917 [Google Scholar]
- Hagenbo A, Piñuela Y, Castaño C, Martínez de Aragón J, de-Miguel S, Alday JG, Bonet JA (2021) Production and turnover of mycorrhizal soil mycelium relate to variation in drought conditions in Mediterranean Pinus pinaster, Pinus sylvestris and Quercus ilex forests. New Phytol 230:1609–1622.10.1111/nph.17012 [DOI] [PubMed]
- Harman G, Howell C, Viterbo A et al (2004) Trichoderma species — opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nat Rev Microbiol 2:43–56. 10.1038/nrmicro797 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Högberg MN, Högberg P (2002) Extramatrical ectomycorrhizal mycelium contributes one-third of microbial biomass and produces, together with associated roots, half the dissolved organic carbon in a forest soil. New Phytol 154:791–795. 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00417.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ihrmark K, Bödeker ITM, Cruz-Martinez K, Friberg H, Kubartova A, Schenck J, Strid Y, Stenlid J, Brandström-Durling M, Clemmensen KE, Lindahl BD (2012) New primers to amplify the fungal ITS2 region– evaluation by 454-sequencing of artificial and natural communities. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 82(3):666–677. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01437.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Irwin A (2024) The ‘Mother Tree’ idea is everywhere — but how much of it is real? Nature 627:718–721 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jada A, Ait Akbour R, Douch J (2006) Surface charge and adsorption from water onto quartz sand of humic acid. Chemosphere 64(8):1287–1295. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.12.063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jakucs E, Eros-Honti Z (2008) Morphological-anatomical characterization and identification of Tomentella ectomycorrhizas. Mycorrhiza 18(6–7):277–285. 10.1007/s00572-008-0183-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Janowski D, Leski T (2023) Methods for identifying and measuring the diversity of ectomycorrhizal fungi. Forestry: Int J For Res 96(5):639–652. 10.1093/forestry/cpad017 [Google Scholar]
- Johnson D (2015) Priorities for research on priority effects. New Phytol 205:1375–1377. 10.1111/nph.13143 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jörgensen K, Clemmensen KE, Wallander H, Lindahl BD (2023) Do ectomycorrhizal exploration types reflect mycelial foraging strategies? New Phytol 237:576–584. 10.1111/nph.18566 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Karst J, Jones MD, Hoeksema JD (2023) Positive citation bias and overinterpreted results lead to misinformation on common mycorrhizal networks in forests. Nat Ecol Evol 7:501–511. 10.1038/s41559-023-01986-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kauserud H (2023) ITS alchemy: on the use of ITS as a DNA marker in fungal ecology. Fungal Ecol 65:101274. 10.1016/J.FUNECO.2023.101274 [Google Scholar]
- Kennedy PG, Peay KG, Bruns TD (2009) Root tip competition among ectomycorrhizal fungi: are priority effects a rule or an exception? Ecology 90:2098–2107. 10.1890/08-1291.1 [DOI] [PubMed]
- Kjøller R (2006) Disproportionate abundance between ectomycorrhizal root tips and their associated mycelia. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 58(2):214–224. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00166.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klein D, Paschke M (2004) Filamentous fungi: the Indeterminate lifestyle and microbial ecology. Microb Ecol 47:224–235. 10.1007/s00248-003-1037-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koide RT, Xu B, Sharda J (2005) Contrasting below-ground views of an ectomycorrhizal fungal community. New Phytol 166:251–262. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01313.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kottke I, Qian X, Pritsch K et al (1998) Xerocomus badius– Picea abies, an ectomycorrhiza of high activity and element storage capacity in acidic soil. Mycorrhiza 7:267–275. 10.1007/s005720050191 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kranjc A (2009) History of deforestation and reforestation in the Dinaric Karst. Geogr Res 47(1):15–23. 10.1111/j.1745-5871.2008.00552.x [Google Scholar]
- Leake JR, Donnelly DP, Boddy L (2002) Interactions between ecto-mycorrhizal and saprotrophic fungi. In: van der Heijden MGA, Sanders IR (eds) Mycorrhizal ecology, ecological studies, vol 157, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 10.1007/978-3-540-38364-2_14
- Lehto T, Zwiazek JJ (2011) Ectomycorrhizas and water relations of trees: a review. Mycorrhiza 21:71–90. 10.1007/s00572-010-0348-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li D, Wen L, Yang L, Luo P, Xiao K, Chen H, Zhang W, He X, Chen H, Wang K (2017) Dynamics of soil organic carbon and nitrogen following agricultural abandonment in a karst region. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 122:230–242. 10.1002/2016JG003683 [Google Scholar]
- Liber JA, Bonito G, Benucci GMN (2021) CONSTAX2: improved taxonomic classification of environmental DNA markers. Bioinformatics 37:3941–3943. 10.1093/BIOINFORMATICS/BTAB347 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lilleskov EA, Bruns TD (2005) Spore dispersal of a resupinate ectomycorrhizal fungus, Tomentella sublilacina, via soil food webs. Mycologia 97(4):762–769. 10.1080/15572536.2006.11832767 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lilleskov EA, Bruns TD, Horton TR, Lee Taylor D, Grogan P (2004) Detection of forest stand-level spatial structure in ectomycorrhizal fungal communities. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 49(2):319–332. 10.1016/j.femsec.2004.04.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martin M (2011) Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. Embnet J 17:10–12 [Google Scholar]
- Martino E, Morin E, Grelet G-A, Kuo A, Kohler A, Daghino S, Barry KW, Cichocki N, Clum A, Dockter RB, Hainaut M, Kuo RC, LaButti K, Lindahl BD, Lindquist EA, Lipzen A, Khouja H-R, Magnuson J, Murat C, Ohm RA, Singer SW, Spatafora JW, Wang M, Veneault-Fourrey C, Henrissat B, Grigoriev IV, Martin FM, Perotto S (2018) Comparative genomics and transcriptomics depict ericoid mycorrhizal fungi as versatile saprotrophs and plant mutualists. New Phytol 217:1213–1229. 10.1111/nph.14974 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McMurdie PJ, Holmes S (2013) Phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS ONE 8:e61217. 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0061217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mitchell JK, Garrido-Benavent I, Quijada L et al (2021) Sareomycetes: more diverse than meets the eye. IMA Fungus 12:6. 10.1186/s43008-021-00056-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Molina R, Trappe JM, Grubisha LC, Spatafora JW (1999) Rhizopogon. In: Cairney JWG, Chambers SM (eds) Ectomycorrhizal fungi key genera in profile, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 10.1007/978-3-662-06827-4_5
- Molinier V, Murat C, Baltensweiler A et al (2016) Fine-scale genetic structure of natural Tuber aestivum sites in southern Germany. Mycorrhiza 26:895–907. 10.1007/s00572-016-0719-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Monfort-Salvador I, García-Montero L, Grande-Ortíz M (2015) Impact of calcium associated to calcareous amendments on ectomycorrhizae in forests: a review. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 15:217–231. 10.4067/S0718-95162015005000018 [Google Scholar]
- Moser B, Büntgen U, Molinier V, Peter M, Sproll L, Stobbe U, Tegel W, Egli S (2017) Ecological indicators of Tuber aestivum habitats in temperate European beech forests. Fungal Ecol 29:59–66. 10.1016/j.funeco.2017.06.002 [Google Scholar]
- Mrak T, Šibanc N, Brailey-Jones P, Štraus I, Gričar J, Kraigher H (2021) Extramatrical mycelium and ectomycorrhizal community composition of Quercus pubescens in a Sub-Mediterranean stress-prone environment. Front For Glob Change 4. 10.3389/ffgc.2021.599946
- Mrak T, Unuk Nahberger T, Maksimović O, Kraigher H, Ferlan M (2025) Experimental drought results in a decline of ectomycorrhizae of Quercus pubescens Willd. Trees 39(4). 10.1007/s00468-024-02581-y
- Nguyen NH, Smith D, Peay K, Kennedy P (2015) Parsing ecological signal from noise in next generation amplicon sequencing. New Phytol 205:1389–1393. 10.1111/nph.12923 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ogrin D (1996) Podnebni tipi v Sloveniji (The climate types in Slovenia). Geografski vestnik 68:39–56. http://zgs.zrc-sazu.si/Portals/8/Geografski_vestnik/Pred1999/GV_6801_039_056.pdf
- Peay KG, Garbelotto M, Bruns TD (2010) Evidence of dispersal limitation in soil microorganisms: Isolation reduces species richness on mycorrhizal tree islands. Ecology 91:3631–3640. 10.1890/09-2237.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peay KG, Schubert MG, Nguyen NH, Bruns TD (2012) Measuring ectomycorrhizal fungal dispersal: macroecological patterns driven by microscopic propagules. Mol Ecol 21(16):4122–4136. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05666.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Petersen RH, Hughes KW (2016) Micromphale sect. Perforantia (Agaricales, Basidiomycetes); Expansion and phylogenetic placement. MycoKeys 18:1–122. 10.3897/mycokeys.18.10007 [Google Scholar]
- Pickles BJ, Simard SW (2017) Chapter 18 - Mycorrhizal networks and forest resilience to drought. In: Collins Johnson N, Gehring C, Jansa J (eds) Mycorrhizal mediation of soil. Elsevier, pp 319–339. 10.1016/B978-0-12-804312-7.00018-8
- Põlme S, Abarenkov K, Henrik Nilsson R, Lindahl BD, Engelbrecht Clemmensen K, Kauserud H, Nguyen N, Kjøller R, Bates ST, Baldrian P, Guldberg Frøslev T, Adojaan K, Vizzini A, Suija A, Pfister D, Baral H-O, Järv H, Madrid H, Nordén J, Liu J-K, Pawlowska J, Põldmaa K, Pärtel K, Runnel K, Hansen K, Larsson K-H, David Hyde K, Sandoval-Denis M, Verbeken A, Kumar Dutta A, Cui B-K, Pradeep CK, Marín C, Stanton D, Gohar D, Wanasinghe DN, Otsing E, Aslani F, Griffith GW, Lumbsch TH, Grossart H-P, Masigol H, Timling I, Hiiesalu I, Oja J, Kupagme JY, Geml J, Alvarez-Manjarrez J, Ilves K, Loit K, Adamson K, Nara K, Küngas K, Rojas-Jimenez K, Bitenieks K, Irinyi L, Nagy LG, Soonvald L, Zhou L-W, Wagner L, Catherine Aime M, Öpik M, Isabel Mujica M, Metsoja M, Ryberg M, Vasar M, Murata M, Nelsen MP, Cleary M, Samarakoon MC, lom M, Bahram M, Hagh-Doust N, Dulya O, Johnston P, Kohout P, Chen Q, Tian Q, Nandi R, Amiri R, Hansika Perera R, dos Santos Chikowski R, Mendes-Alvarenga RL, Garibay-Orijel R, Gielen R, Phookamsak R, Jayawardena RS, Rahimlou S, Karunarathna SC, Tibpromma S, Brown SP, Sepp S-K, Mundra S, Luo Z-H, Bose T, Vahter T, Netherway T, Yang T, May T, Varga T, Li W, Rafael Matos Coimbra V, Rodrigo Targino de Oliveira V, Xavier de Lima V, Mikryukov VS, Lu Y, Matsuda Y, Miyamoto Y, Kõljalg U, Tedersoo L (2021) FungalTraits: a user-friendly traits database of fungi and fungus-like stramenopiles. 10.1007/s13225-020-00466-2
- Qi D, Wieneke X, Xue P et al (2021) Total nitrogen is the main soil property associated with soil fungal community in karst rocky desertification regions in southwest China. Sci Rep 11:10809. 10.1038/s41598-021-89448-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rineau F, Garbaye J (2009) Effects of liming on ectomycorrhizal community structure in relation to soil horizons and tree hosts. Fungal Ecol 2(3):103–109. 10.1016/j.funeco.2009.01.006 [Google Scholar]
- Rognes T, Flouri T, Nichols B, Quince C, Mahé F (2016) VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ e2584. 10.7717/PEERJ.2584/FIG-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Rosinger C, Sandén H, Matthews B, Mayer M, Godbold DL (2018) Patterns in ectomycorrhizal diversity, community composition, and exploration types in European beech, pine, and spruce forests. Forests 9:445. 10.3390/f9080445 [Google Scholar]
- Saikkonen K, Mikola J, Helander M (2015) Endophytic phyllosphere fungi and nutrient cycling in terrestrial ecosystems. Curr Sci 109(1):121–126. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24905696
- Söderström BE (1979) Seasonal fluctuations of active fungal biomass in horizons of a podzolized pine-forest soil in central Sweden. Soil Biol Biochem 11(2):149–154. 10.1016/0038-0717(79)90093-2 [Google Scholar]
- Song C, Fukami T, Saavedra S (2021) Untangling the complexity of priority effects in multispecies communities. Ecol Lett 24:2301–2313. 10.1111/ele.13870 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Štursová M, Kohout P, Human Z, Baldrian P (2020) Production of fungal mycelia in a temperate coniferous forest shows distinct seasonal patterns. J Fungi 6. 10.3390/jof6040190 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Taudiere A, Munoz F, Lesne A, Monnet A-C, Bellanger J-M, Selosse M-A, Moreau P-A, Richard F (2015) Beyond ectomycorrhizal bipartite networks: projected networks demonstrate contrasted patterns between early- and late-successional plants in Corsica. Front Plant Sci 6. 10.3389/fpls.2015.00881 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Tedersoo L, Drenkhan R, Abarenkov K, Anslan S, Bahram M, Bitenieks K et al (2024) The influence of tree genus, phylogeny, and richness on the specificity, rarity, and diversity of ectomycorrhizal fungi. Environ Microbiol Rep 16(2):e13253. 10.1111/1758-2229.13253 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Treseder KK, Lennon JT (2015) Fungal traits that drive ecosystem dynamics on land. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 79. 10.1128/mmbr.00001-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Vlk L, Tedersoo L, Antl T, Větrovský T, Abarenkov K, Pergl J, Albrechtová J, Vosátka M, Baldrian P, Pyšek P, Kohout P (2020) Alien ectomycorrhizal plants differ in their ability to interact with co-introduced and native ectomycorrhizal fungi in novel sites. ISME J 14(9):2336–2346. 10.1038/s41396-020-0692-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wallander H, Nilsson LO, Hagerberg D, Bååth E (2001) Estimation of the biomass and seasonal growth of external mycelium of ectomycorrhizal fungi in the field. New Phytol 151:753–760. 10.1046/j.0028-646x.2001.00199.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- White T, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J, Innis M, Gelfand D et al (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA (ed) PCR - protocols and applications– a laboratory manua. Academic Press, pp 315–322 [Google Scholar]
- Zorn M, Kumer P, Ferk M (2015) Od gozda do gozda ali kje je goli, kamniti Kras? Kronika (Ljubljana) 63:561–574 [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data and metadata supporting the findings of this study are available via DiRROS repository (10.20315/Data.0004). Raw sequence data were deposited in SRA (BioProject PRJNA1243991).








