Abstract
Background: The central variant of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (cvPRES) is an atypical subtype of PRES. Although no unifying definitions exists, it is most often characterized by vasogenic edema involving “central” structures, such as the brainstem, subcortical nuclei, and spinal cord, with relative sparing of the parieto-occipital lobes. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the PRISMA guidelines and was pre-registered on PROSPERO [CRD42023483806]. Both the Joanna Briggs Institute and New-Castle Ottawa scale were used for case reports and cohort studies, respectively. The meta-analysis was completed using R-Studio and its associated “metafor” package. Results: A comprehensive search in four databases yielded 70 case reports/series (n = 100) and 12 cohort studies. The meta-analysis revealed a pooled incidence rate of 13% (95% CI: 9–18%) for cvPRES amongst included cohort studies on PRES. Significant heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 71% and a τ 2 = 0.2046). The average age of affected individuals was 40.9 years, with a slightly higher prevalence in males (54%). The most common etiological factor was hypertension (72%). Fifty percent had an SBP >200 mmHg at presentation and a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 217.6 ± 40.82. Imaging revealed an increased T2 signal involving the brain stem (88%), most often in the pons (62/88; 70.45%), and 18/100 (18%) cases of PRES with spinal cord involvement (PRES-SCI). Management primarily involved blood pressure reduction, with adjunctive therapies for underlying causes such as anti-seizure medications or hemodialysis. The MAP between isolated PRES-SCI and cvPRES without spinal cord involvement did not show significant differences (p = 0.5205). Favorable outcomes were observed in most cases, with a mortality rate of only 2%. Conclusions: cvPRES is most often associated with higher blood pressure compared to prior studies with typical PRES. The pons is most often involved. Despite the severity of blood pressure and critical brain stem involvement, those with cvPRES have favorable functional outcomes and a lower mortality rate than typical PRES, likely attributable to reversible vasogenic edema without significant neuronal dysfunction.
Keywords: PRES, central variant, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, systematic review, meta-analysis, posterior reversible leukoencephalopathy syndrome
1. Introduction
Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a neurological disorder characterized by a variety of symptoms, including headaches, altered mental status, seizures, and visual disturbances. It is most identified through characteristic radiological findings, predominantly involving the posterior regions of the cerebral cortex and subcortical white matter [1]. Although the exact pathophysiology of PRES remains incompletely understood, it is thought to be related to endothelial dysfunction, leading to vasogenic edema. In recent years, a variant of this condition, known as central-variant PRES (cvPRES), has been increasingly recognized. Unlike the classical form of PRES, which predominantly affects the posterior regions of the brain, central-variant PRES is characterized by the involvement of central brain structures, including the basal ganglia, thalamus, brainstem, and/or spinal cord. This variation presents unique diagnostic challenges and may have different clinical implications compared to the typical form of PRES [2]. However, no unified consensus on the definition of cvPRES has been established.
cvPRES raises several critical questions about its epidemiology, clinical presentation, risk factors, pathophysiology, and outcomes. While there is growing literature on this subject, there has been no comprehensive synthesis of the evidence to date. Misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis can lead to inappropriate management, potentially resulting in adverse outcomes. Understanding the distinct features of central-variant PRES, including its triggers, clinical course, and response to treatment, is crucial for optimizing patient care. Additionally, the location of vasogenic edema within the posterior fossa and brainstem brings forth the concern for life-threatening herniation syndromes, which may require decompressive craniectomy and other neurosurgical interventions.
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aim to provide a detailed analysis of the characteristics of cvPRES, comparing them with the classical form of the syndrome where relevant. We will evaluate aspects such as demographics, clinical manifestations, precipitating factors, imaging findings, medical and surgical management strategies, purported pathophysiological mechanisms, and outcomes. By doing so, we seek to offer a comprehensive overview of this condition, contributing to better recognition, diagnosis, and management of patients with central-variant PRES.
2. Methods
This study was exempt from an institutional review board, as it involves analysis of de-identified data that have already been collected. Therefore, it will not be possible to trace the data presented back to individual patients.
2.1. Search Strategy
A PRISMA directed systematic review and meta-analysis were planned and prospectively registered on PROSPERO [CRD42023483806] and Open Science Framework (OSF) [3]. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across four electronic databases, including PubMed/PubMed Central/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Hinari. The search strategy was designed to include a combination of keywords and MeSH terms related to “Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome,” “PRES,” “central variant,” “brainstem variant,” and related terminologies. The complete search string and terminologies for each database are included in Table 1. The search was restricted to studies published in English from the inception of the database. Reference lists of identified articles were manually searched to ensure the inclusion of additional relevant studies. Both backwards and forward citation tracking was utilized, and a gray literature search was completed by reviewing the first 100 results on Google Scholar and Open Gray.
Table 1.
Databases queried including the search string utilized.
| Database | Search String |
|---|---|
| PubMed/PubMedCentral/MEDLINE | (“Posterior Leukoencephalopathy Syndrome” OR “Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome” OR “PRES”) AND (“central variant” OR “central variant” OR “brainstem” OR “spinal cord”) |
| ScienceDirect | (“Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome” OR “PRES”) AND (“central variant” OR “brainstem” OR “spinal cord”) |
| Scopus | (“Posterior Leukoencephalopathy Syndrome” OR “Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome” OR “PRES”) AND (“central-variant” OR “central variant” OR “brainstem” OR “spinal cord”) |
| Hinari | (“Posterior Leukoencephalopathy Syndrome” OR “Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome” OR “PRES”) AND (“central variant” OR “central variant” OR “brainstem” OR “spinal cord”) |
2.2. Eligibility Criteria
Studies were included if they met the following criteria: (1) patients diagnosed with central-variant PRES, as defined by imaging criteria, which include increased T2-weighted signal involving central structures (e.g., basal ganglia, thalamus, brainstem, cerebellum, and spinal cord) in the absence of significant cortical involvement; (2) articles reporting on clinical features, imaging findings, management, and outcomes; and (3) study designs including randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, and case reports/series. All cases were reviewed by board-eligible or certified adult neurologists. Articles only of the English language were included. Reviews, editorials, commentaries, and studies with insufficient data on central-variant PRES were excluded. Records published in non-peer reviewed journals were not included in the analysis.
2.3. Data Extraction
First, the aggregate records from the initial search were exported to EndNote 21, and duplicate records were removed. Next, two reviewers (B.S.S. & M.A.G-D.) independently extracted data using the Rayyan QCRI web platform. Extracted information included study characteristics (author, year of publication, study design), patient demographics (age, gender), clinical presentations, imaging findings, management strategies, and outcomes. Discrepancies between reviewers were resolved through discussion or by consulting a third reviewer (B.S.).
2.4. Quality and Risk of Bias Assessment
The quality and risk of bias assessment was assessed using appropriate tools: the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) assessment tool for case reports/series and the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale for observational studies. The JBI tool consists of eight items addressing different aspects of the methodological quality of case reports, including precise patient demographics, accurate diagnosis, objective measurements of intervention outcomes, and follow-up information. The quality and risk of bias assessment were conducted by two authors (B.S.S., M.A.G-D.); a third author was consulted (B.S.) for any discrepancy between reviewers.
2.5. Statistical Analysis and Meta Analysis
Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the extracted data. Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and as frequencies and percentages for categorical variables. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis to estimate the incidence rate of cvPRES from cohort studies. The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to assess for normality. An unpaired t-test was used when comparing MAPs between cvPRES without spinal cord involvement (SCI) and PRES-SCI. The meta-analysis was conducted using R-Studio, employing the “metafor” package to pool the incidence rate across studies. We assessed heterogeneity among studies using the I2 statistic. To visualize the results, we generated forest plots to display the individual and pooled incidence rate with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Funnel plots were used to assess publication bias, and Baujat plots were constructed to identify studies that contributed significantly to heterogeneity.
2.6. Data Validation
Although the data presented here and their corresponding analysis is declassified, the data sheet and document will be stored on a secure password-protected hard drive indefinitely. The ethical standards outlined by the Declaration of Helsinki will be upheld. No attempt will be made to identify individual patients.
3. Results
3.1. Search Results
A total of 1120 records were obtained. After removing duplicates, 912 records had their abstracts and titles screened. A total of 191 records were reviewed and assessed for eligibility for inclusion in the qualitative and quantitative synthesis. A PRISMA-guided flow diagram of record assessment is provided in Figure 1. Single case records and case series are presented in Table 2 [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90]. Cohort studies are included in Table 3 [7,18,21,26,62,91,92,93,94,95].
Figure 1.
PRISMA flow diagram of included studies.
3.2. Clinical and Radiographic Characteristics
A total of 70 records with 100 patients are included in the single-case analysis. A total of 12 cohort studies are included. The average age of reported cases was 40.9. Fifty-four of one hundred cases occurred in men and 46/100 in women. Fourteen cases were reported in patients < 18 years of age. The most reported medical history include hypertension (40/100; 40% of cases), chronic kidney disease/end stage renal disease (ESRD) (13/100; 13%), acute kidney injury (4/100; 4%), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (2/100), systemic lupus erythematosus (6/100; 6%), and other immunological conditions, including Sjogren disease, polyarteritis nodosa, and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (4/100; 4%). One case of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) (1), neurofibromatosis type-1 (NF-1), and testicular carcinoma on bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin were observed.
The systolic blood pressure (SBP) on arrival ranged from 120 to 270 mmHg (median: 200). Fifty out of one hundred cases had an SBP >200 mmHg. The mean SBP was 202 ± 37.58 mmHg (range: 120–270), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 124 mmHg ± 27.35 mmHg (range: 40–220), pulse pressure (PP) 77.7 ± 22.89 (range: 36–142), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) 217.6 ± 40.82 (range: 85.3–326.66). Nineteen cases had seizures, 42/100 had headaches, and 21/100 had visual disturbance, with alteration in mental status in 14/100, three with aphasia, and one with Anton-Babinski syndrome, and 6/100 had decreased level of consciousness. Neurological symptoms localizing to the posterior circulation (e.g., dysarthria, dysphagia, dysmetria, nausea, vomiting, nystagmus, vertigo, lower cranial nerve palsy, obtundation/comatose, etc.) were seen in 30% of cases.
MRI findings included T2/FLAIR hyperintensities or vasogenic edema involving the brainstem in 88/100 cases: (62/88 pons, 21/88 midbrain, 22/88 medulla). Additionally, vasogenic edema was observed in other areas, including 38/100 cerebellum/cerebellar peduncle, 21/100 basal ganglia, 15/100 thalamus, and 18/100 cases involving the spinal cord (18/18 cervical cord lesion, 5/18 thoracic cord lesion). Eighteen percent of cases reported diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) hyperintensities with corresponding apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping hypointensities. Four reported susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) hypointensities involving the bilateral thalami (1), basal ganglia (2) and pons (1), and cerebral white matter (1). These SWI findings are suggestive of chronic microbleeds due to hypertension. Shimizu et al. reported a case of pediatric T-ALL with significant vasogenic edema, diffusion restriction, and contrast enhancement within the cerebellum [68]. Yamagami et al. reported a case of central-variant PRES with associated hemorrhagic transformation involving the basal ganglia and thalamus [78]. Zhang et al. presented a case of brainstem PRES involving the pons with hemorrhagic conversion [80]. de Havenon et al. presented two cases of spinal cord PRES, which showed a central confluent lesion involving the entire spinal cord [81]. Agarwal et al. reported a pediatric case of PRES-SCI with leptomeningeal enhancement [88].
Cerebrospinal fluid analysis when completed was often normal; six cases reported elevated protein. Kachi et al. reported a case of central PRES secondary to Sjogren disease, which showed elevated SSA/B antibodies as well as elevated oligoclonal bands in CSF [41]. Decker et al. completed a cerebellar biopsy on a patient with hypertension-related central PRES and found fibrinoid change and perivascular infiltrates of mature lymphocytes [27]. The case by Yis et al. demonstrated an elevated IgG index of 0.9 (normal: <0.7) [96].
Medical management most often included blood pressure reduction and seizure management. Thirteen cases required renal-replacement therapy (RRT), one case required VA-ECMO after a cardiac arrest, one individual required plasma exchange for thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, and four patients were treated with intravenous methylprednisolone, often with an underlying autoimmune condition (i.e., SLE and Sjogren disease). Three cases required emergent external ventricular drain (EVD) placement, two individuals required suboccipital decompressive craniectomy, and there was one case of high cervical (C1) laminectomy. One patient was treated with erythropoietin, ferrous sulfate, and bicarbonate for metabolic acidosis from obstructive nephropathy leading to uremia [40]. The patient described by Vaysman et al. who was hypertensive and had SLE was treated with plasmapheresis [75]. The case by Shimizu et al. showed significant hypertension in a 10-year-old girl (>99th percentile) on a chemotherapy regimen for T-ALL including four doses of intravenous vincristine (1.5 mg/m2 ) and daunorubicin (30 mg/m2) given every week, eight doses of intramuscular L-asparaginase (5000 units/m2) administered every third day, daily oral dexamethasone (10 mg/m2/day for three weeks and subsequent taper), and a single dose of intrathecal cytarabine (30 mg), methotrexate (12 mg), and prednisolone (10 mg) administered on day five of treatment [68]. Yokoyama et al. reported a case of central-variant PRES secondary to blood pressure fluctuations from Guillain Barre syndrome (GBS) treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) [79].
The most common purported causes were hypertension (72/100; 72%), eclampsia (2), renal failure/kidney disease (4), SLE (4), Sjogren disease (1) hypomagnesemia (1), immunotherapy (1), sulfasalazine (1), and GBS (1). The case by Chaudhari et al. reported central PRES in a one-week postpartum woman with no clear etiology [23]. The case by Sharma et al. reported a 7-year-old boy with grade IV vesicoureteral reflex with hypertension [67]. Chan et al. reported the case of a 4-year-old boy with hypertension from NF-1-related renal artery stenosis with prominent vasogenic edema involving the pons, medulla, cerebellar hemispheres, and complete spinal cord (cervical > thoracic) [87]. Marrone et al. reported a case of central-variant PRES due to hypertension secondary to renal-artery stenosis from paraaortic lymph node dissection [86]. The pediatric PRES-SCI case by Agarwal et al. occurred because of hypertension secondary to renal artery stenosis [88]. The PRES-SCI case presented by Choh et al. occurred due to hypertension from IgA nephropathy [89]. Srichawla et al. reported a case of cvPRES due to rapidly fluctuating blood pressure presumedly from adrenal insufficiency [95]. Most cases showed clinical and radiographic improvement in 1–2 months from the initial diagnosis. We report a mortality rate of 2%; all cases succumbed to the illness and died within the same hospitalization.
3.3. Retrospective Studies
Ahn et al. (2004) completed a single-center retrospective analysis of PRES and reported a prevalence of 4/37, 10.8% of the central-variant of PRES. Bansal et al. (2020) described 22 cases of PRES, wherein 40% had radiographic involvement of the cerebellum, 15% of the basal ganglia, 10% of the deep white matter, and 10% of the brainstem [7,18]. Brewer et al. (2013) performed a 10-year retrospective analysis on the neuroimaging findings of 47 women who had eclampsia. Eleven individuals (23%) were reported to involve the basal ganglia and cerebellum, five of whom were antepartum, and six were postpartum [97]. Chen et al. (2017) performed a retrospective analysis and found 11 individuals with the central variant of PRES (seven male and four female), with a median age of 60.0 (range 40.0–63.5). The reported etiology was hypertension in all eleven cases [91]. Chou et al. (2004) performed a retrospective analysis of 12 patients with clinical radiographic findings consistent with PRES [26]. Of the reported cases, 1/12 had radiographic findings consistent with the central variant (case 25). Fitzgerald et al. (2015) completed a retrospective review from 2007–2012 and identified 6/80 (7.5%) cases of central-variant PRES [92]. They determined a higher prevalence of extreme hypertension and renal dysfunction compared to the non-central variant [92]. Li et al. (2012) completed a retrospective study of 59 cases of PRES and reported the central variant occurring in five patients (brainstem n = 2; basal ganglia n = 3) [98]. McKinney et al. (2013) completed a retrospective review of 124 cases of PRES and determined 5/124 (4%) to have the central variant [2]. McKinney et al. (2007) completed another retrospective study of 76 PRES cases and determined that 30.3% involved the thalamus and 34.2% the cerebellum; 18.4% were within the brainstem, and 11.8% involved the basal ganglia [93]. Raman et al. (2017) completed a retrospective review of 92 patients with PRES and identified a total of 22 individuals with predominant brainstem and cerebellar involvement [99]. Yoon et al. completed a retrospective analysis of 16 PRES patients and found atypical radiographic findings including four episodes within the basal ganglia, three in the brainstem, two in the cerebellum, and three in the thalamus [100]. Aygunes et al. completed a retrospective review of 101 pediatric patients with PRES who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplant [94]. They found a 15.8% (16/101) incidence of the central variant. They also noted a higher mortality rate (n = 10, 62.5%) compared to those with the typical variant (n = 5, 5.9%) [94].
3.4. PRES-SCI
A direct unpaired two-tailed t-test was performed to compare the mean arterial pressure (MAP) between isolated PRES with spinal cord involvement (PRES-SCI) and central-variant PRES without spinal cord involvement. Prior to the t-test, normality of the data was confirmed using the Shapiro–Wilk test, yielding W = 0.9329 and p = 0.2433, which passed the normality threshold with an α = 0.05. The unpaired t-test revealed no statistically significant difference in MAP between the two groups (t = 0.6453, p = 0.5205), suggesting that MAP levels are comparable in these presentations of PRES with spinal cord involvement. However, this may be limited by the smaller sample size in the PRES-SCI group (18 vs. 85).
3.5. Meta-Analysis of Incidence Rate
The meta-analysis calculated the pooled incidence rate of the observed events (cvPRES) across the included studies. A total of eight studies that provided enough information on the incidence of the central variant of PRES was included in the quantitative synthesis. Using a random-effects model, the pooled incidence rate was estimated at 13% (CI: 9–18%) (Figure 2). Heterogeneity among studies was substantial, with an I2 = 71% and a τ2 = 0.2046. The heterogeneity was statistically significant (p < 0.01), indicating considerable variation in effect sizes across studies. To assess potential publication bias, a funnel plot was generated, and a Baujat plot was used to identify influential studies contributing to heterogeneity (Figure 3 and Figure 4).
Figure 2.
Forest plot depicting the pooled incidence rate of events across studies using both fixed-effects and random-effects models. Individual study proportions with 95% confidence intervals are shown alongside their respective weights under both models. The random-effects pooled estimate is 0.13 (95% CI: 0.09–0.18), indicating moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 71%, τ2 = 0.2046, p < 0.01). The diamond represents the overall effect size and its confidence interval for the random-effects model [2,7,26,92,94,97,98,99].
Figure 3.
Funnel plot assessing publication bias in the included studies. The x-axis represents the logit-transformed proportion of events, while the y-axis represents the standard error. Open circles indicate individual studies, with the dashed diagonal lines representing the 95% confidence interval around the pooled effect estimate. Symmetry in the plot suggests minimal publication bias; however, asymmetry could indicate potential bias or heterogeneity in the included studies. Filled circles represent imputed studies added using the trim-and-fill method to adjust for potential bias [2,7,26,92,94,97,98,99].
Figure 4.
Baujat plot illustrating the contribution of individual studies to overall heterogeneity and their influence on the pooled effect size. The x-axis represents the contribution of each study to overall heterogeneity, while the y-axis indicates the study’s influence on the overall result. Studies located further from the origin exhibit a higher impact on heterogeneity and/or the pooled effect. In this analysis, McKinney et al. (2013) and Raman et al. (2017) demonstrate notable contributions to heterogeneity and influence on the pooled estimate, suggesting their potential role in driving variability within the meta-analysis [2,7,26,92,94,97,98,99].
3.6. Quality and Risk of Bias Assessment of Case Reports/Series
The methodological quality and risk of bias for the included studies were assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tool. Of the studies evaluated, the majority (n = 79) achieved a perfect score (8/8), indicating high methodological rigor and a low risk of bias. These studies consistently satisfied all eight appraisal criteria, demonstrating robustness in study design and reporting. Three studies received scores of 6/8 or 5/8, reflecting a moderate risk of bias due to unmet criteria in areas such as follow-up completeness or consideration of confounding factors. These studies include Arai et al. (1997), Braatz et al. (2014), and Matsumoto et al. (2014) [10,21,51]. Two studies (Doi et al., Resorlu et al.) scored 4/8, corresponding to a high risk of bias and potential limitations in methodological quality (Table 3) [63,101]. Overall, the quality assessment demonstrates that the included studies are predominantly of high methodological quality, with a small subset requiring caution in interpretation due to moderate to high risks of bias.
3.7. Quality and Risk of Bias Assessment of Cohort Studies
The quality of included cohort studies was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS), which evaluates selection (maximum 4 points), comparability (maximum 2 points), and outcomes (maximum 3 points). A total score of 9 indicates the highest quality. Many of the studies (n = 10) achieved scores of 8 or 9, indicating robust methodological quality. Notably, Chen et al. (2017) scored the maximum 9 points, meeting all criteria across selection, comparability, and outcomes [91]. Other studies, including Ahn et al. (2004), Brewer et al., and Chou et al. (2004), consistently scored 8, reflecting strong performance in most domains [7,26,97]. One study, Bansal et al. (2020), scored 4 points [18]. While it demonstrated adequacy in selection (3 points) and outcome (1 point), it lacked comparability between cohorts, which significantly impacted its total score (Table 4).
4. Discussion
The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis provide a comprehensive understanding of the clinical, radiographic, and management characteristics of cvPRES, a rare but significant subtype of PRES. With an overall pooled incidence rate of 13% (95% CI: 9–18%) across cohort studies, our results underscore the clinical importance of recognizing this variant in settings where its presentation may deviate from the typical posterior-predominant PRES. In a study by Fugate et al., the mean peak systolic blood pressure among PRES patients was 199 mm Hg (range: 160–268 mm Hg), and the mean peak diastolic blood pressure was 109 mm Hg (range: 60–144 mm Hg) [102]. Another study by Rabinstein et al. reported that approximately 75% of PRES patients presented with hypertension, indicating that while elevated blood pressure is common, it is not a universal finding in PRES cases [103]. They reported a mean SBP of 182 ± 20 mm Hg and MAP 124 ± 15 [103]. In our cohort of 100 patients with cvPRES, we reported a higher mean SBP and MAP at 202 ± 37.58 mmHg and 217.6 ± 40.82, respectively.
The higher blood pressure observed in cvPRES compared to typical PRES may suggest a distinct pathophysiological mechanism potentially driven by differential vascular autoregulatory thresholds in central brain structures. Unlike the posterior cortex, which has relatively low autoregulatory capacity and is prone to vasogenic edema at moderate elevations in blood pressure, the brainstem, basal ganglia, and thalamus may require more extreme hypertension to surpass their autoregulatory limits [104]. This could explain the selective involvement of these regions in central-variant PRES. Furthermore, the proximity of these structures to deep perforating arteries with limited collateral flow may exacerbate vulnerability under conditions of severe hypertension, leading to more profound endothelial dysfunction, breakdown of the blood-brain barrier, and vasogenic edema [105]. Excessive adrenergic stimulation may amplify vascular permeability and inflammatory responses in central brain regions. Additionally, the co-occurrence of microvascular compromise or pre-existing structural abnormalities, such as chronic hypertension-induced arteriolosclerosis, could heighten susceptibility to central-variant manifestations. However, these hypotheses need to be supported by original studies.
In our dataset, the pons was predominantly affected, which may be attributed to several pathophysiological mechanisms underlying reversible pontine edema. The pons, a critical structure within the brainstem, is particularly susceptible to fluctuations in blood pressure due to its unique vascular supply and limited sympathetic innervation [106]. Acute hypertension can overwhelm the autoregulatory capacity of the pontine vasculature, leading to endothelial dysfunction and increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier [107]. Furthermore, the anatomical configuration of the pons, with its dense arrangement of neural tracts and nuclei, may predispose it to the accumulation of interstitial fluid during episodes of increased vascular permeability [52]. The resultant edema can disrupt neural conduction, leading to the clinical manifestations observed in patients with pontine involvement. Most notably, patients with cvPRES rarely reported diffusion restriction or cytotoxic edema within the pons. Thus, the impaired autoregulation does not lead to irreversible neuronal injury and permanent neurological deficits, which may be seen in a pontine stroke or central pontine myelinolysis [108].
Table 2.
Single-patient records included in the systematic review and meta-analysis.
| Case No. | Author | Publication Type | Year | Age | Gender | Risk Factors | Blood Pressure | Clinical Sequelae | CT Findings | MRI Findings | Vessel Imaging | CSF Examination | Treatment | Purported Cause | Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Abe et al. [4] | Case Report | 2014 | 59 | M | HTN, ESRD | 181/81 mmHg | Headache, nausea, dysarthria, tic, and weakness involving the bilateral arms and legs | Hypodense lesion involving pons and cerebellum | T2/FLAIR hyperintense lesion involving the pons and cerebellum | NA | Normal | Blood Pressure management and RRT (HD) | HTN | Radiographic and clinical improvement in 13 days |
| 2 | Abraham et al. [5] | Case Report | 2020 | 25 | F | SLE, Lupus nephritis (grade IV) | SBP 190 mmHg | GTC seizure, direction-changing torsional nystagmus, horizontal ophthalmoplegia, and symmetric weakness |
T2/FLAIR hyperintense and ADC hypointense lesion involving bilateral paramedian thalamic and pontine hyperintensity. SWI punctate hypointensity within the areas of restricted diffusion in the bilateral thalami and pons, compatible with microhemorrhages |
MRA: Subtle short segment stenoses involving bilateral external carotid arteries, the right V4 segment, and the right P2 segment. |
Normal | Blood pressure management and RRT | HTN | Clinical improvement at 3 months. SWI imaging showed persistent punctate microhemorrhages in the bilateral thalami and pons. | |
| 3 | Abusabha et al. [6] | Case Report | 2017 | 52 | M | HTN | SBP 260 mmHg | Headaches, vertigo, blurred vision | NA | T2/FLAIR and DWI hyperintensities involving the bilateral cerebellum, pons, and occipital lobe | NA | NA | EVD insertion and suboccipital craniectomy and C1 | HTN | Radiographic and clinical improvement in 3 weeks |
| 4 | Ahn et al. [7] | Retrospective Study | 2004 | 29 | F | NA | 155/100 mmHg | Generalized tonic clonic seizures | NA | T2/FLAIR hyperintensities and ADC hypointensities involving bilateral basal ganglia | NA | NA | Blood pressure management | Postpartum eclampsia | Radiographic and clinical resolution |
| 5 | Ahn et al. [7] | Retrospective Study | 2004 | 28 | F | NA | 180/120 mmHg | Generalized tonic clonic seizures | NA | T2/FLAIR hyperintensities and ADC hypointensities involving bilateral basal ganglia and thalami | NA | NA | Blood pressure management |
Eclampsia | Radiographic and clinical resolution |
| 6 | Ahn et al. [7] | Retrospective Study | 2004 | 41 | M | HTN, CKD (diabetic nephropathy) | 240/140 mmHg | Alteration in mental status | NA | T2/FLAIR hyperintensities and ADC hypointensities involving bilateral pons | NA | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN | Radiographic and clinical resolution |
| 7 | Ahn et al. [7] | Retrospective Study | 2004 | 32 | F | HTN, CKD | 190/100 mmHg | Alteration in mental status | NA | T2/FLAIR hyperintensities and ADC hypointensities involving bilateral pons | NA | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN | Radiographic and clinical resolution |
| 8 | Akhondian et al. [8] | Case Report | 2022 | 4 | F | Secondary hyperaldosteronism, HTN. | 180/110 mmHg | Alteration in mental status and status epilepticus | NA | T2/FLAIR and DWI hyperintensities in splenium of the corpus callosum, in cerebellum, brainstem, and cervical spinal cord | NA | NA | Seizure management (phenytoin, and phenobarbital). Blood pressure management (hydralazine, furosemide, and captopril). | HTN from secondary hyperaldosteronism | Radiographic and clinical resolution within one month |
| 9 | Andour et al. [9] | Case Series | 2023 | 59 | F | Diabetes, HTN | 170/100 mmHg | Alteration in mental status | Normal | T2/FLAIR, DWI hyperintense and ADC hypointense lesions involving temporal and occipital regions, in corpus callosum, in the brainstem and cerebellum |
NA | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN | Clinical resolution of symptoms |
| 10 | Andour et al. [9] | Case Series | 2023 | 34 | M | Kidney failure | NA | GTC seizure | NA | T2/FLAIR hyperintensity left putamen with gadolinium enhancement | NA | NA | HD | Renal failure | Clinical and radiographic resolution of symptoms |
| 11 | Arai et al. [10] | Case Report | 1997 | 57 | M | CKD, polyarteritis nodosa | 200/140 mmHg | GTC seizures | Parietal lobe hypodensity | T2/FLAIR hyperintensities emporo-occipital white matter, the thalamus, the posterior limbs of the internal capsules, the external capsules, the midbrain, the pons, and the middle cerebellar peduncles | NA | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN | NA |
| 12 | Aridon et al. [11] | Case Report | 2011 | 53 | M | Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura | 260/180 mmHg | Disturbances of gait, dizziness, urinary incontinence and lethargy |
Enlargement of the lateral and third ventricles |
T2/FLAIR hyperintensities involving white matter of cerebral and cerebellar hemispheres with the involvement of midbrain and cerebellar peduncles |
NA | Elevated protein (77 mg/dL) | Blood pressure management (nitroprusside, furosemide, and clonidine) and plasma exchange |
HTN | Clinical and radiographic resolution of symptoms at 3 months |
| 13 | Bag et al. [14] | Case Report | 2010 | 23 | F | SLE | Normal | Alteration in mental status. Being treated for SLE with IV methylprednisolone 40 mg every 8 h. | T2/FLAIR and DWI hyperintensities involving bilateral thalamic and cerebral peduncle | NA | NA | Methylprednisolone 500 mg daily and cyclophosphamide. | SLE | Clinical and radiographic resolution of symptoms at 8 months | |
| 14 | Bălaşa et al. [15] | Case Report | 2015 | 42 | M | None | 190/110 mmHg | Occipital headache, nausea, vomiting and disequilibrium. Elevated creatinine 9.88 mg/dL on arrival. |
Multiple white matter hypodensities in both cerebellar hemispheres and the brainstem |
T2/FLAIR hyperintensities involving the cerebellar white matter as well as in the pons and midbrain |
NA | NA | Hemodialysis and blood pressure management | HTN (due to kidney disease) | Clinical and radiographic resolution of symptoms at 2 weeks |
| 15 | Ball et al. [16] | Case Report | 2023 | 53 | M | Alcohol abuse | NA | 3 days of slurred speech, headache, and dizziness | T2/FLAIR hyperintensities involving the bilateral cerebellum | Normal | NA | Magnesium infusion | Hypomagnesemia (<0.5 mg/dL) | Clinical and radiographic resolution of symptoms (unspecified follow-up time) | |
| 16 | Bandeo et al. [17] | Case Report | 2018 | 26 | F | Ulcerative colitis Adalimumab (40 mg every other week) | NA | Thunderclap headache with photophobia, nausea, and vomiting. | NA | Left frontal cSAH and hyperintense lesions on T2-weighted and FLAIR sequences located in both occipital lobes, left cerebellar hemisphere, and brainstem | DSA: Normal | NA | Discontinuation of adalimumab | Adalimumab | Clinical and radiographic resolution of symptoms at 2 months |
| 17 | Bansal et al. [18] | Retrospective Study | 2020 | 16 | F | Viral hepatitis, and acute kidney injury | NA | Alteration in mental status, seizures, vomiting | NA | T2/FLAIR hyperintensities including basal ganglia, deep white mater and temporal lobe | NA | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN | NA |
| 18 | Barnaure et al. [19] | Case Report | 2014 | 57 | M | HTN | Elevated (unspecified) | Gait ataxia | NA | T2/FLAIR hyperintensities involving e pons, medulla, and cerebellum, and a small zone of contrast enhancement in the pons |
NA | Normal | Blood pressure management | HTN | Clinical and radiographic resolution of symptoms at 1 week |
| 19 | Bing et al. [20] | Case Report | 2019 | 53 | M | None | 220/120 mmHg | Acute onset aphasia, fever | NA | T2/FLAIR hyperintensities involving the pons, medulla, and cervical spinal cord | NA | NA | Blood pressure management (nicardipine and urapidil) | HTN | Clinical and radiographic resolution of symptoms in one month |
| 20 | Braatz et al. [21] | Case Report | 2014 | 39 | M | NA | 230/140 mmHg | Headache, nausea, blurriness, and cortical blindness | NA | T2/FLAIR and DWI hyperintensities involving the pons and medulla | NA | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN | NA |
| 21 | Chakroun-Walha et al. [22] | Case Report | 2016 | 14 | M | Renal insufficiency | 200/150 mmHg | Headaches, ataxia, hemianopsia, bilateral strabismus, GTC seizure | Hypodensities in the brainstem | T2/FLAIR hyperintensities involving the brainstem and partially cerebellum | NA | NA | Blood pressure management and hemodialysis | HTN (Renal etiology) | Persistent strabismus and hemianopsia |
| 22 | Chaudhari et al. [23] | Case Report | 2018 | 28 | F | Caesarean section one week prior to presentation | NA | Seizure (abnormal movements of limbs and tongue-biting) | T2/FLAIR hyperintensities involving bilateral basal ganglia, and left cerebellum | NA | Normal | Seizure management (levetiracetam, and phenytoin) | Postpartum? | Clinical and radiographic improvement in 8 weeks | |
| 23 | Chen et al. [109] | Case Report | 2014 | 55 | M | HTN | 210/140 mmHg | Headache and dizziness | NA | T2/FLAIR hyperintensities in the pons, midbrain bilateral thalami, and cerebellar hemispheres with multiple microbleeds at bilateral basal ganglia |
NA | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN | Clinical and radiographic improvement in 1 month |
| 24 | Chiang et al. [25] | Case Report | 2019 | 47 | M | ESRD, missed three dialysis sessions | 194/114 mmHg | Comatose | Hypodentisities in the brainstem | T2/FLAIR hyperintensities involving the pons and cerebellum | NA | Normal | RRT and blood pressure management | HTN (missed dialysis sessions) | Clinical and radiographic improvement in 2 weeks |
| 25 | Chou et al. [26] | Retrospective Study | 2004 | 52 | M | HTN | 194/120 | Seizure, aphasia | NA | T2/FLAIR hyperintensities involving deep white matter, thalamus, and pons | NA | NA | Blood pressure management, anticonvulsants, and RRT. | HTN | Clinical and radiographic improvement in 4 months |
| 26 | Decker et al. [27] | Case Report | 2009 | 74 | M | HTN | 224/144 mmHg | Slurred speech, right-sided facial droop, and incontinence of urine |
NA | T2/FLAIR hyperintensities involving the brainstem (pons and midbrain) | NA | Normal (opening pressure of 16 cm of water, a protein of 129 mg/dL, WBC count of 1/mm3 , and glucose of 65 mg/dL (serum glucose 137 mg/dL). |
Blood pressure management | HTN | Clinical and radiographic improvement in 3 months |
| 27 | Deguchi et al. [28] | Case Report | 2012 | 42 | F | HTN, CKD, thrombocytopenia | 270/150 mmHg | Headache, nausea | NA | T2/FLAIR hyperintensities involving the brainstem and cerebellum | NA | NA | Blood pressure management (amlodipine, nifedipine, arotinolol) | HTN | Clinical and radiographic improvement in 1 month |
| 28 | Dhawan et al. [29] | Case Report | 2010 | 10 | F | Pheochromocytoma |
260/190 mmHg | Facial palsy and bilateral papilledema |
NA | T2/FLAIR hyperintensities in the bilateral caudate, putamen, thalamus, left-sided posterior limb of internal capsule, midbrain | NA | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN (pheochromocytoma) | Clinical and radiographic improvement in 2 years |
| 29 | Di Stefano et al. [30] | Case Report | 2019 | 46 | M | Mononucleosis, GERD | 200/140 mmHg | One-month history of headache and blurry vision in the right eye | NA | T2/FLAIR hyperintensities involving brainstem (midbrain, pons, medulla) and cervical spinal cord (C5–C6) | Normal | NA | Blood pressure management (ramipril, doxazosin) | HTN | Clinical and radiographic improvement in 3 weeks |
| 30 | Doi et al. [101] | Case Report | 2020 | 73 | M | Metastatic colorectal cancer | NA | Acute onset visual disturbance | NA | Increased T2-weighted signal within the pons, cerebellum, and bilateral optic nerves. Diffusion restriction within the pons and cerebellum | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| 31 | Doi et al. [31] | Case Report | 2006 | 35 | M | None | 180/118 mmHg | Headache, nausea, blurred vision | NA | Increased T2-weighted signal in the pons, cerebellum, and basal ganglia | NA | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN | Clinical and radiographic improvement in 1 month |
| 32 | Doi et al. [31] | Case Report | 2006 | 52 | F | HTN | 200/130 mmHg | Altered mental status | NA | Increased T2-weighted signal in the midbrain, basal ganglia, and cerebellum | NA | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN | Radiographic improvement in 2 weeks |
| 33 | Fujii et al. [32] | Case Report | 2023 | 57 | M | None | 173/134 mmHg | Rigidity | NA | Increased signal on T2WI within the bilateral cerebellum, optic tract, cerebellar vermis, and cervical spinal cord. With DWI and ADC correlate in most lesions | NA | NA | RRT and blood pressure management | HTN | Radiographic improvement in five weeks |
| 34 | Gowan et al. [33] | Case Report | 2019 | 47 | F | HTN, T2DM, ESRD | 180/99 mmHg | 1-week history of altered mental status, difficulties walking, fatigue, and syncope | Normal | Increased signal on T2WI involving the pons and cerebellum | NA | NA | RRT and blood pressure management | HTN | Radiographic improvement on day 9 |
| 35 | Grossbach et al. [34] | Case Report | 2014 | 65 | F | Colon cancer | 217/113 mmHg | Comatose | Increased signal on T2WI involving the bilateral cerebellum | NA | CSF: Normal | Mechanical ventilation, sub-occipital craniectomy, EVD placement, | HTN | Modified Rankin score (mRS) 0 in six months | |
| 36 | Hama et al. [35] | Case Report | 2019 | 49 | F | CKD | 242/144 mmHg | 2-week history of vomiting and malaise | NA | Increased signal on T2WI involving the pons and medulla | NA | NA | RRT and blood pressure management | HTN and kidney disease | Clinical and radiographic improvement in 3 weeks |
| 37 | Han et al. [36] | Case Report | 2019 | 46 | M | HTN | 147/103 mmHg | Acute onset dysarthria and mild dysphagia | NA | Increased signal on T2WI brainstem, cerebellum and corticospinal Tracts. Diffusion restriction involving pons. Microhemorrhages seen on SWI within pons |
NA | CSF: Elevated protein 55 mg/dL | Conservative management | Acute kidney injury | Clinical and radiographic improvement within 4 weeks |
| 38 | Hayashi et al. [37] | Case Report | 2022 | 71 | M | NA | 209/124 mmHg | Decreased level of consciousness | NA | Increased signal on T2WI within the pons | NA | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN | Clinical improvement and discharge on day 20 |
| 39 | Hebant et al. [38] | Case Report | 2019 | 80 | F | HTN, HLD | 190/110 mmHg | Acute alteration in mental status | NA | Increased signal on T2WI involving the medulla and right cerebellar peduncle | NA | CSF: Elevated protein. | Blood pressure management | HTN | Clinical and radiographic improvement within a few days |
| 40 | Ho et al. [12] | Case Report | 2016 | 49 | M | NA | 202/138 mmHg | Vertigo, cognitive decline, and difficulty ambulating | Hypodensity involving pons | Increased signal on T2WI involving the pons | NA | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN | Radiographic resolution in 10 days, clinical improvement in |
| 41 | Honda et al. [13] | Case Report | 2019 | 46 | F | NA | 208/140 mmHg | Visual impairment | NA | Increased signal on T2WI involving the pons and bilateral cerebellar hemispheres | NA | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN | Clinical and radiographic resolution |
| 42 | Jesrani et al. [39] | Case Report | 2021 | 39 | F | NA | 118/74 mmHg | GTC seizures | NA | Increased signal on T2WI involving the right caudate nucleus, bilateral thalami, and left globus pallidus | NA | NA | Anti-seizure medications | SLE | Death on day 4 |
| 43 | Jia et al. [40] | Case Report | 2017 | 14 | F | Neurogenic bladder | 120/81 mmHg | Decreased level of consciousness (comatose) | NA | Increased signal on T2WI involving the midbrain and pons | NA | NA | Erythropoietin, ferrous sulfate, bicarbonate | Renal failure (obstructive nephropathy) | Discharged on day 14 at baseline and radiographic resolution at 2 months |
| 44 | Kachi et al. [41] | Case Report | 2023 | 71 | F | HTN, Sjogren’s disease | 197/108 mmHg | Unsteadiness and weakness of the left lower extremity | NA | Increased signal on T2WI involving the basal ganglia, thalamus, brainstem, cerebellum |
NA | CSF: Elevated protein, oligoclonal bands anti-SSA/SSB, IL-6 | IVMP 1000 mg for 3 days. Followed by oral prednisone 1 mg/kg. | Sjogren disease | Significant improvement on discharge |
| 45 | Katano et al. [42] | Case Report | 2010 | 54 | M | NA | 201/113 mmHg | Dysarthria and altered mental status | NA | Increased signal on T2WI involving the pons with ADC correlate | NA | NA | Antihypertensive therapy with hemodialysis | HTN | Continued renal dysfunction, unspecified neurological outcome |
| 46 | Kitaguchi et al. [43] | Case Series | 2005 | 73 | M | CKD, Wernicke encephalopathy | 220/116 mmHg | Appetite loss and failure to thrive | NA | Increased signal on T2WI involving the pons, thalamus, and cerebellum | NA | NA | Antihypertensive therapy | HTN | Mild lateral gaze palsy at 16-month follow-up |
| 47 | Kitaguchi et al. [43] | Case Series | 2005 | 49 | F | Aortic valve replacement | 88/40 mmHg | GTC seizure, flu-like symptoms | CT scan showed a lacunar infarction in the left internal capsule of the brain | Increased signal on T2WI involving the pons | NA | CSF: Normal | Supportive treatment | Undefined | Clinical and radiographic improvement in 2 months. Residual lacunar infarction within pons |
| 48 | Lamotte et al. [44] | Case Report | 2021 | 51 | M | Nasopharyngeal carcinoma | 185/125 mmHg | Dysarthria and gait instability | NA | Increased signal on T2WI involving the bilateral cerebellum, pons, and temporal lobes | NA | NA | Hemodialysis | Acute renal failure | Resolution of neurological symptoms in 3 days |
| 49 | Lee et al. [45] | Case Report | 2017 | 47 | F | NA | 270/220 mmHg | AMS | NA | Increased signal on T2WI involving the pons | NA | CSF: Opening pressure 21 cm H2O. Protein 102 mg/dL, albumin 64 mg/dL. | Blood pressure management | HTN | Resolution of neurological symptoms in 3 days and radiographic resolution on 9th day |
| 50 | Liu et al. [46] | Case Report | 2018 | 37 | F | HTN | 240/140 mmHg | Headache and blurry vision | NA | Increased signal on T2WI with diffusion restriction involving the midbrain | Normal | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN | Clinical and radiographic resolution in 2 weeks |
| 51 | Maciel et al. [47] | Case Report | 2015 | 44 | F | NA | 150/110 mmHg | Subacute onset headache and visual disturbance | NA | Increased signal on T2WI involving the midbrain, pons, medulla, and cerebellar hemispheres | NA | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN | Clinical resolution in 2 weeks |
| 52 | Maier et al. [49] | Case Report | 2018 | 22 | F | SLE | Normal | GTC seizures | Symmetrical hypodense lesions within the basal ganglia | Increased signal on T2WI involving the bilateral basal ganglia | NA | NA | Anti-seizure medications and osmolar therapy | SLE associated Immunosuppressive therapy (cyclophosphamide and azathioprine) | Death due to septic shock |
| 53 | Malhotra et al. [48] | Case Report | 2017 | 42 | F | SLE, HTN, pulmonary hypertension | 217/75 mmHg | Confusion, dysarthria, R hemiparesis, and hemianesthesia | Normal | Increased signal on T2WI involving the bilateral basal ganglia and thalamus | DSA: Normal | EEG: Normal | Blood pressure management | HTN | Radiographic improvement at 5 weeks and discharge to a long-term care facility |
| 54 | Maruyama et al. [50] | Case Report | 2023 | 53 | M | HTN | 214/145 mmHg | Headache and left-sided weakness | NA | Increased signal on T2WI involving the pons and bilateral cerebellar hemispheres | NA | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN | Radiographic improvement in 3 weeks and clinical resolution at 8 weeks |
| 55 | Matsumoto et al. [51] | Case Report | 2023 | 70s | F | HTN | 199/111 mmHg | Generalized weakness | NA | Increased signal on T2WI involving the pons, cerebellum, and medulla | NA | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN | Radiographic resolution in 10 months |
| 56 | McCarron et al. [52] | Case Report | 2008 | 42 | M | NA | 195/115 mmHg | GTC seizure, right-sided hemiparesis | NA | Increased signal on T2WI involving the pons | NA | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN | Almost complete radiographic resolution at 3-month follow-up |
| 57 | Moosa et al. [53] | Case Report | 2011 | 8 | F | Cloacal exstrophy, omphalocele, Chiari malformation with myelomeningocele and syringomyelia, and renal dysplasia with end stage renal disease. | 180/120 mmHg | Status epilepticus | NA | Increased signal on T2WI involving the midbrain and pons | NA | NA | Blood pressure management and anti-seizure medications | HTN | Radiographic resolution in 9 days |
| 58 | Nagato et al. [54] | Case Report | 2009 | 14 | F | NA | 185/145 mmHg | Nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain | NA | Increased signal on T2WI involving the pons, medulla, cerebellum, and cervical spinal cord | NA | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN | Significant clinical and radiographic improvement over 5 months |
| 59 | Nanba et al. [55] | Case Report | 2016 | 47 | F | NA | 197/106 mmHg | Headache | NA | Increased signal on T2WI involving the pons, bilateral thalamus, bilateral basal ganglia, and periventricular white matter | NA | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN | Radiographic improvement in 2 weeks |
| 60 | Navarro-Ballester et al. [56] | Case Report | 2021 | 62 | M | HTN, HLD | 190/95 mmHg | Nausea and vomiting | NA | Increased signal on T2WI involving the midbrain with SAH | DSA: mildly hypoplastic right vertebral artery | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN | Modified Rankin score of one at 6-month follow-up |
| 61 | Ocek et al. [57] | Case Report | 2015 | 55 | F | Psoriatic arthritis | 120/80 mmHg | Seizure, headache, hemiparesis | NA | Increased signal on T2WI involving the basal ganglia and thalamus | NA | CSF: Normal. EEG: Mild background slowing | Removal of toxic agent | sulfasalazine | Radiographic resolution of symptoms in 1 month |
| 62 | Ogaki et al. [66] | Case Report | 2009 | 49 | F | NA | 260/170 mmHg | Subacute onset worsening blurry vision | NA | Increased signal on T2WI involving the pons, bilateral cerebellum, and thalami | NA | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN | Discharge in one month with radiographic improvement |
| 63 | Ohashi et al. [58] | Case Report | 2022 | 4-month-old | F | NA | SBP 100–130 mmHg | Cardiac arrest following immunization | NA | Increased signal on T2WI involving the bilateral basal ganglia | NA | NA | VA-ECMO, peritoneal dialysis | HTN | Discharge in 6 months |
| 64 | Onomura et al. [59] | Case Report | 2022 | 40s | F | Hypertension | 230/150 mmHg | Headache, fatigue, and nausea | NA | Increased signal on T2WI involving the supratentorial white matter, cerebellum, pons, and cerebellar peduncles. Numerous white matter microhemorrhages involving the cerebral white matter | NA | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN | Discharge on day 20 with moderate improvement |
| 65 | Osman et al. [60] | Case Report | 2013 | 32 | M | T1DM, HTN | 220/140 mmHg | GTC seizure | NA | Increased signal on T2WI involving the bilateral pons and midbrain | NA | CSF: Normal | Blood pressure management | HTN | Repeat neuroimaging 12 days later showed significant improvement |
| 66 | Ou et al. [61] | Case Report | 2018 | 40 | M | NA | 200/140 mmHg | Headache | NA | Increased signal on T2WI involving the pons | NA | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN | Clinical resolution within three days |
| 67 | Raya et al. [62] | Case Report | 2019 | 29 | M | HIV, ESRD, HTN | 245/141 mmHg | Headache and burry vision | NA | Increased signal on T2WI involving the bilateral cerebellar hemisphere with more subtle involvement of the bilateral occipital lobes | NA | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN | Discharged on day 7 of hospitalization with no symptoms |
| 68 | Resorlu et al. [63] | Case Report | 2017 | 39 | M | HTN | 170/110 mmHg | Headache | NA | Increased signal on T2WI involving the pons | NA | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN | Radiographic resolution on hospital day 20 |
| 69 | Ribeiro et al. [65] | Case Report | 2013 | 59 | F | HIV | 210/110 mmHg | Headache, nausea, vomiting, blurry vision | NA | Increased signal on T2WI involving the basal ganglia, thalamus, internal and external capsules, and pons. SWI: microhemorrhages within the pons | NA | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN | Clinical improvement on hospital day 3 |
| 70 | Sallah et al. [64] | Case Report | 2021 | 64 | F | ESRD, stroke | 207/110 mmHg | Lethargy | NA | Increased signal on T2WI involving the pons and bilateral middle cerebellar peduncles | NA | EEG: Findings within the ictal-interictal continuum. | Blood pressure management and hemodialysis | HTN + ESRD | Clinical and radiographic resolution on day 11 of hospitalization |
| 71 | Sharma et al. [67] | Case Report | 2017 | 7 | M | None | 190/100 mmHg | GTC seizure | NA | Increased signal on T2WI involving the midbrain, pons, medulla, and cervical spinal cord | NA | NA | Blood pressure management and anti-seizure medications | HTN + Grade IV vesicoureteral reflex. | Radiographic improvement within 3 weeks |
| 72 | Shimizu et al. [68] | Case Report | 2013 | 10 | F | T-ALL | 141/105 mmHg | Headache | NA | Increased signal on T2WI involving the bilateral cerebellum. Gd+ enhancement within the same area. DWI showing patchy diffusion restriction within the bilateral cerebellum | NA | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN+ chemotherapy (vincristine, danorubicin, dexamethasone, cytarabine, methotrexate, prednisolone) | Radiographic improvement within 6 months |
| 73 | Srinivasan et al. [69] | Case Report | 2017 | 71 | M | HTN | 200/140 mmHg | Headache, dizziness, loss of consciousness | NA | Increased signal on T2WI involving the pons with restricted diffusion on DWI | NA | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN | Clinical improvement. Repeat imaging not completed. |
| 74 | Tan et al. [70] | Case Report | 2019 | 52 | M | HTN, CKD | 267/159 mmHg | Headache, dizziness | CTH: Hypoattenuation involving the pons | NA | NA | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN | Clinical improvement on day 2 of hospitalization |
| 75 | Tari Capone et al. [71] | Case Report | 2014 | 37 | M | HTN | 270/160 mmHg | Headache, and blurry vision | NA | Increased signal on T2WI involving the midbrain and pons | NA | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN | Clinical improvement in 2 weeks and radiographic resolution within 3 months |
| 76 | Thambisetty et al. [72] | Case Series | 2003 | 38 | M | HTN, anemia, thrombocytopenia, chronic hyponatremia, ETOH abuse | 210/130 mmHg | Headache, right-sided weakness | Obstructive hydrocephalus, non-enhancing hypoattenuation in pons, midbrain |
Obstructive hydrocephalus, increased T2 signal in the pons and midbrain |
NA | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN | Clinical resolution |
| 77 | Thambisetty et al. [72] | Case Series | 2003 | 61 | M | None | 219/138 mm.Hg | Left-sided weakness | Old lacunar infarction in anterior limb of right internal capsule, 5-mm hemorrhagic focus in right putamen |
Increased T2 signal in the pons, cerebral peduncles and basal ganglia bilaterally |
NA | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN | Clinical resolution |
| 78 | Thambisetty et al. [72] | Case Series | 2003 | 46 | M | T2DM, HTN, anemia, stroke | 203/139 mmHg | Blurred vision, confusion | Hypoattenuation in the pons, cerebral peduncles and internal capsule bilaterally |
Increased T2 signal in midbrain, pons, medulla and cerebral peduncles. Focus of hemorrhage in left basal ganglia |
NA | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN | Clinical resolution |
| 79 | Tortora et al. [73] | Case Report | 2015 | 32 | F | Abortion (1-month ago) | 120/70 mmHg | Headache and fever | Hypoattenuation within the right basal ganglia | Increased T2 signal and diffusion restriction in the pons | NA | NA | Enoxaparin and magnesium sulfate | Unknown | Residual coordination deficits of the extremities, and radiographic findings of pontine ischemia |
| 80 | Tsutsumi et al. [74] | Case Report | 2012 | 54 | F | None | 260/142 mmHg | Dysarthria, right-sided hemiparesis | Normal | Increased T2 signal involving the pons. MR spectroscopy showed an elevated choline level | NA | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN due to pseudochromocytoma | Radiographic resolution on hospital day 18 |
| 81 | Tsutsumi et al. [74] | Case Report | 2012 | 44 | F | None | 209/130 mmHg | Headache, blurry vision, gait abnormalities | NA | Increased T2 signal involving the pons | NA | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN | Radiographic resolution on hospital day 20 |
| 82 | Vaysman et al. [75] | Case Report | 2019 | 22 | F | SLE | 197/121 mmHg | Headache, and joint pain | Normal | Increased T2 signal involving the midbrain | NA | NA | Blood pressure management and plasmapheresis | HTN + SLE | Clinical and radiographic resolution of the patients’ symptoms on day 10 |
| 83 | Wakely et al. [76] | Case Report | 2005 | 33 | M | None | 210/150 mmHg | Headache, and visual disturbance | Normal | Increased T2 signal and diffusion restriction involving the pons | NA | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN | Radiographic resolution of symptoms within 2 months |
| 84 | Wittgrove et al. [77] | Case Report | 2018 | 57 | M | None | 220 mmHg | Aphasia, altered mental status, right-sided weakness | Normal | Increased T2 signal involving the pons and cerebellar peduncles | NA | Elevated protein 80 mg/dL | Blood pressure management | HTN secondary to renal artery stenosis | Clinical and radiographic improvement of the patient’s symptoms |
| 85 | Yamagami et al. [78] | Case Report | 2019 | 41 | F | HTN | 237/142 mmHg | Headache | Hemorrhage involving the left thalamus and basal ganglia | Increased T2 signal involving the left cerebellum, pons, temporal lobes, and bilateral basal ganglia | DSA: Normal | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN | Transferred to an inpatient rehabilitation facility on hospital day 40 with a modified Rankin score of 3. Repeat MRI showing resolution of vasogenic edema |
| 86 | Yis et al. [96] | Case Report | 2016 | 9 | F | None | 225/110 mmHg | Headache, vomiting, visual disturbance | NA | Increased T2 signal involving the medulla and cervical spinal cord | NA | CSF: 57 mg/dL, IgG Index 0.9. | Blood pressure management and methylprednisolone | HTN | Clinical improvement in 7 days and radiographic resolution in 10 days |
| 87 | Yokoyama et al. [79] | Case Report | 2019 | 43 | M | Guillain Barre syndrome (GBS) | 152/88 mmHg | Decreased level of consciousness | NA | Increase T2 signal involving the pons, midbrain, cerebellar peduncle, and basal ganglia. Diffusion restriction | NA | NA | IVIG and blood pressure management | HTN secondary to GBS | Significant improvement with residual limb weakness |
| 88 | Zhang et al. [80] | Case Report | 2016 | 35 | M | HTN | 200/140 mmHg | Dizziness | Hypodensity involving the pons with focal hyperdensity consistent with acute hemorrhagic conversion | Increased T2 signal involving the pons | NA | CSF: Elevated opening pressure of 245 mm H2O | Blood pressure management | HTN | Clinical and radiographic improvement in one month |
| 89 | de Havenon et al. [81] | Case Report | 2014 | 50 | M | HTN, CKD | 180/110 mmHg | Headache, vomiting, confusion | NA | Increased T2 signal involving the parieto-occipital lobes, bilateral cerebellum, medulla and confluent central lesion involving the entire spinal cord | NA | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN | Near complete radiographic resolution 5 months. Clinically has residual mild lower extremity weakness |
| 90 | de Havenon et al. [81] | Case Report | 2014 | 25 | M | HTN | 225/160 mmHg | Headache, vision loss | NA | Increased T2 signal involving the medulla and central lesions involving the entire spinal cord | NA | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN | Complete clinical and radiographic resolution in 3 months |
| 91 | Milia et al. [82] | Case Report | 2008 | 44 | F | HTN | 240/140 mmHg | Headache, lower extremity weakness, blurry vision | NA | Increased T2 signal involving the pons, medulla, and a central cord lesion from the cervicomedullary junction to C5 | NA | CSF: Normal | Blood pressure management | HTN | Clinical and radiographic resolution in 6 months |
| 92 | Samara et al. [83] | Case Report | 2019 | 42 | M | HTN | 250/130 mmHg | Headache and blurry vision | Periventricular edema, enlarged ventricles, and effacement of the basilar cistern | Increased T2 signal involving the medulla, cerebellum, and upper cervical spinal cord. | NA | CSF: Normal | Blood pressure management | HTN | Clinical and radiographic resolution in 2 months |
| 93 | Liu et al. [84] | Case Report | 2019 | 20 | M | HTN | 260/140 mmHg | Blurry vision and weakness | NA | Increased T2 signal involving the medulla, cervical and thoracic spinal cord | NA | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN | Clinical and radiographic resolution in 10 days |
| 94 | Chan et al. [87] | Case Report | 2018 | 4 | M | NF1 | 180/80 mmHg | Tachycardia | NA | Increased T2 signal involving the pons, medulla, cerebellum, and complete spinal cord (most prominent in cervical cord) | NA | CSF: Normal | Blood pressure management | HTN from NF 1-related renal artery stenosis | Clinical and radiographic improvement in 6 weeks with some residual vasogenic edema within the medulla |
| 95 | Gocmen et al. [85] | Case Report | 2016 | 10 | M | HTN, ESRD | 170/120 mmHg | Headaches | NA | Increased T2 signal involving the medulla and cervical spinal cord (C1-C5) | NA | Deferred | Blood pressure management | HTN from ESRD | Clinical and radiographic resolution in 10 days |
| 96 | Marrone et al. [86] | Case Report | 2016 | 19 | M | Testicular carcinoma (bleomycin, cisplatin and etoposide) | 240/140 mmHg | Headache, nausea, and central scotoma of the left eye | NA | Increased T2 signal involving the bilateral basal ganglia, pons, medulla, and anterior portion of the entire cervical spinal cord | NA | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN from renal artery stenosis from paraaortic lymph node dissection | Clinical and radiographic resolution in two weeks |
| 97 | Agarwal et al. [88] | Case Report | 2016 | 14 | M | Appendectomy | 170/110 mmHg | Seizure, headache, and blurry vision | NA | Increased T2 signal involving the pons, medulla, and entire spinal cord. Contrast sequence showing diffuse leptomeningeal enhancement | NA | CSF: Normal | Blood pressure management | HTN from renal artery stenosis | Clinical and radiographic improvement in 28 days |
| 98 | Choh et al. [89] | Case Report | 2011 | 17 | M | None | 240/130 mmHg | Headache, visual disturbance, vomiting | NA | Increased T2 signal involving the medulla and cervical spinal cord | NA | NA | Blood pressure management | HTN from IgA nephropathy | Clinical and radiographic improvement within one month |
| 99 | Khokhar et al. [90] | Case Report | 2016 | 22 | M | None | 200/140 mmHg | Headache, vomiting, blurry vision | NA | Increased T2 signal involving the parieto-occipital lobes with predmoninant involvement of the medulla, cerebellar hemisphere, and cervical spinal cord | NA | CSF: Normal. EEG: Normal | Blood pressure management | HTN | Clinical and radiographic improvement in 25 days |
| 100 | Srichawla et al. [95] | Case Report | 2025 | 59 | F | HTN, COPD | 195 mmHg SBP | Seizures, altered mental status | NA | Increased T2 signal involving the bilateral cerebellar hemisphere | CTA: Normal | CSF: Normal. EEG: Bilateral intermittent rhythmic discharges. Generalized periodic discharges, lateralized rhythmic delta activity in the left frontal lobe. | Blood pressure management | HTN due to adrenal insufficiency | Clinical and radiographic improvement on day 15 |
ADC: apparent diffusion coefficient. CKD: chronic kidney disease. COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. cSAH: convexity subarachnoid hemorrhage. DSA: digital subtraction angiography. DWI: diffusion weighted imaging. ESRD: end-stage renal disease. F: female. GBS: Guillain–Barre syndrome. GTC: generalized tonic clonic. HD: hemodialysis. HIV: human immunodeficiency virus. HTN: hypertension. IVIG: intravenous immunoglobulin. M: male. SBP: systolic blood pressure. MRA: magnetic resonance angiography. RRT: renal-replacement therapy. SAH: subarachnoid hemorrhage. SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus. SWI: susceptibility weighted imaging. T-ALL: T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Table 3.
Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal and risk of bias results for case reports/series.
| Reference | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q8 | Overall | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abe et al. (2014) [4] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Abraham et al. (2020) [5] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Abusabha et al. (2017) [6] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Akhondian et al. (2002) [8] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Andour et al. (2023) [9] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Arai et al. (1997) [10] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | N | N | 5 | Moderate |
| Aridon et al. (2011) [11] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Bag et al. (2010) [14] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Bălaşa et al. (2015) [15] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Ball et al. (2023) [16] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Bandeo et al. (2018) [17] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Barnaure et al. (2014) [19] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Bing et al. (2009) [20] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Braatz et al. (2014) [21] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | N | 6 | Moderate |
| Chakroun-Walha et al. (2018) [22] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Chaudhari et al. (2014) [23] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Chiang et al. (2019) [25] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Chou et al. (2004) [26] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Decker et al. (2009) [27] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Deguchi et al. (2012) [28] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Dhawan et al. (2010) [29] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | N | N | 5 | Low |
| Di Stefano et al. (2019) [30] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | N | N | 5 | Moderate |
| Doi et al. [101] | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | N | N | N | 4 | High |
| Doi et al. [31] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Fujii et al. [32] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Gowan et al. [33] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Grossbach et al. [34] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Hama et al. [35] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Han et al. [36] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | 7 | Low |
| Hayashi et al. [37] | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | N | N | Y | 5 | Mod |
| Hebant et al. [38] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Ho et al. [12] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Honda et al. [13] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Jesrani et al. [39] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Jia et al. [40] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Kachi et al. [41] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Kitaguchi et al. [43] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Lamotte et al. [44] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Lee et al. [45] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Liu et al. [46] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Maciel et al. [47] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Maier et al. [50] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Malhotra et al. [48] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Maruyama et al. [50] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Matsumoto et al. [51] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | N | 6 | Moderate |
| McCarron et al. [52] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Moosa et al. [53] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Nagato et al. [54] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Nanba et al. [55] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Navarro-Ballester et al. [56] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Ocek et al. [57] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Ogaki et al. [66] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Ohashi et al. [58] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Onomura et al. [59] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Osman et al. [60] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Ou et al. [61] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Raya et al. [62] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Resorlu et al. [63] | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | N | N | N | 4 | High |
| Ribeiro et al. [65] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Sallah et al. [64] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Sharma et al. [67] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Shimizu et al. [68] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Srinivasan et al. [69] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Tan et al. [70] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Tari Capone et al. [71] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Thambisetty et al. [72] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Tortora et al. [73] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Vaysman et al. [75] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Wakely et al. [76] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Wittgrove et al. [77] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Yamagami et al. [78] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Yokoyama et al. [79] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Zhang et al. [80] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Havenon et al. [81] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Milia et al. [82] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Samara et al. [83] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Liu et al. [84] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Chan et al. [87] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Gocmen et al. [85] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Marrone et al. [86] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Agarwal et al. [88] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Choh et al. [89] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Khokhar et al. [90] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
| Srichawla et al. [95] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 | Low |
Q1. Were the patient’s demographic characteristics clearly described? Q2. Was the patient’s history clearly described and presented as a timeline? Q3. Was the current clinical condition of the patient on presentation clearly described? Q4. Were diagnostic tests or assessment methods and the results clearly described? Q5. Was the intervention(s) or treatment procedure(s) clearly described? Q6. Was the post-intervention clinical condition clearly described? Q7. Were adverse events (harms) or unanticipated events identified and described? Q8. Does the case report provide takeaway lessons? Overall: Sum of points. Y—Yes; N—No; U—Unclear; NA—Not applicable.
Table 4.
Assessment of retrospective cohort studies using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale.
| Study | Selection (4 Score) | Comparability (2 Score) | Outcome (3 Score) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ahn et al. (2004) [7] | *** | ** | *** | 8 |
| Bansal et al. (2020) [18] | *** | * | 4 | |
| Brewer et al. [97] | *** | ** | *** | 8 |
| Chen et al. (2017) [91] | **** | ** | *** | 9 |
| Chou et al. (2004) [26] | *** | ** | *** | 8 |
| Fitzgerald et al. (2015) [92] | *** | ** | *** | 8 |
| Li et al. [98] | *** | ** | *** | 8 |
| McKinney et al. (2013) [2] | *** | ** | *** | 8 |
| McKinney et al. (2007) [93] | *** | ** | *** | 8 |
| Raman et al. (2017) [99] | *** | ** | *** | 8 |
| Yoon et al. (2013) [100] | *** | ** | *** | 8 |
| Aygunes et al. (2024) [94] | *** | ** | *** | 8 |
Limitations and Future Direction
This review has several limitations. First, the included studies predominantly consisted of case reports and small retrospective cohort studies, limiting the generalizability of our findings. The heterogeneity observed (I2 = 71%, τ2 = 0.2046) suggests variability in study designs, diagnostic criteria, and patient populations. Our meta-analysis attempts to address this through random-effects modeling. Additionally, publication bias may have influenced our results, as suggested by the asymmetry in the funnel plot and influential studies identified in the Baujat plot. The reliance on English-language studies may also introduce selection bias. Although we show that cvPRES has a higher mean MAP compared to isolated PRES seen in other studies, head-to-head studies needs to be completed to validate this. Further research is needed to better elucidate the pathophysiology and optimal management of central-variant PRES. Prospective studies with larger sample sizes and standardized diagnostic criteria are essential to validate our findings and explore the impact of specific interventions on patient outcomes. Symptoms and clinical characteristics of cvPRES appear to be similar to those of normal PRES; however, this should be studied using a comparator group. Moreover, longitudinal studies examining the long-term cognitive and functional sequelae of central-variant PRES could provide valuable insights into its prognosis. Finally, the integration of advanced hemodynamic monitoring, particularly those techniques that can measure the rate of MAP changes to estimate cerebral perfusion pressure and autoregulatory changes within the cerebral vasculature, will be necessary to identify the exact pathophysiological underpinnings of cvPRES compared to its typical clinico-radiographic presentation.
5. Conclusions
Central-variant PRES (cvPRES) manifests predominantly in younger adults with severe hypertension, most often involving the pons and other central structures (i.e., subcortical nuclei, brainstem, cerebellum, and spinal cord), and has a pooled incidence rate of 13% amongst cohort studies of PRES. Despite higher blood pressures and critical brainstem edema, outcomes are generally favorable (2% mortality), reflecting reversible vasogenic injury rather than permanent neuronal damage. Cases of cvPRES have a higher MAP compared to that what is reported in the literature of typical PRES. However, this needs to be supported with original studies. Early recognition of its distinctive imaging pattern and prompt blood-pressure management are key to optimizing recovery. Future prospective studies should standardize diagnostic criteria, elucidate underlying autoregulatory mechanisms, and evaluate targeted interventions to further improve patient outcomes.
Author Contributions
B.S.S. completed the literature review, drafted the initial manuscript, generated illustrations/figures, provided intellectual verification of the topic, and edited the final manuscript. M.A.G.-D. drafted the initial manuscript. B.S.S. and B.S. provided intellectual verification on this topic. All authors reviewed the final draft of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article. Further enquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Conflicts of Interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there are no conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
This research received no external funding.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Hinchey J., Chaves C., Appignani B., Breen J., Pao L., Wang A., Pessin M.S., Lamy C., Mas J.L., Caplan L.R. A reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 1996;334:494–500. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199602223340803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.McKinney A.M., Jagadeesan B.D., Truwit C.L. Central-variant posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: Brainstem or basal ganglia involvement lacking cortical or subcortical cerebral edema. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2013;201:631–638. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Page M.J., McKenzie J.E., Bossuyt P.M., Boutron I., Hoffmann T.C., Mulrow C.D., Shamseer L., Tetzlaff J.M., Akl E.A., Brennan S.E., et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Abe T., Tokuda Y. Recurrent posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome of the brainstem in a hypertensive patient with end-stage renal disease. J. Emergencies Trauma Shock. 2014;7:242–243. doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.136876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Abraham P., Longardner K., Chen P., Huisa B., Handwerker J. Case 279: Central-Variant Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome. Radiology. 2020;296:239–243. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020181547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Abusabha Y., Petridis A.K., Kraus B., Kamp M.A., Steiger H.J., Beseoglu K. Life-threatening posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in the cerebellum treated by posterior fossa decompression. Acta Neurochir. (Wien.) 2017;159:1325–1328. doi: 10.1007/s00701-017-3228-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ahn K.J., You W.J., Jeong S.L., Lee J.W., Kim B.S., Lee J.H., Yang D.W., Son Y.M., Hahn S.T. Atypical manifestations of reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome: Findings on diffusion imaging and ADC mapping. Neuroradiology. 2004;46:978–983. doi: 10.1007/s00234-004-1276-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Akhondian J., Ashrafzadeh F., Seilanian Toosi F., Behnam M., Beiraghi Toosi M., Imannezhad S., Akhoundian M.R., Hashemi N. A case report of Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome with spinal cord involvement (PRES-SCI) as an atypical presentation of PRES in children. Iran. J. Child Neurol. 2022;16:149–154. doi: 10.22037/ijcn.v16i1.32170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Andour H., Cheraqui A., Lahfidi A., Fikri M., Ech-Cherif El Kettani N., Jiddane M., Touarsa F. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES): Should more attention be paid to the atypical forms? Radiol. Case Rep. 2023;18:545–549. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2022.10.079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Arai M., Shigeno K., Wada M. A reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome in a patient with classical polyarteritis nodosa. Clin. Neurol. 1997;37:64–66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Aridon P., Ragonese P., Mazzola M.A., Quintini G., Lo Re M., Talamanca S., Terruso V., D'Amelio M., Savettieri G. Reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome in a patient with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Neurol. Sci. 2011;32:469–472. doi: 10.1007/s10072-010-0465-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ho T.H., Tsai C.L., Hsu Y.D., Lee J.T., Yang F.C., Hsu C.C., Lin C.C. Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome Mimicking Brainstem Infarction: A Dilemma. Acta Neurol. Taiwan. 2016;25:56–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Honda K., Hashimoto S. Brainstem Cerebellum-type Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome. Intern. Med. 2020;59:1337–1338. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.3603-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bag A.K., Curé J.K., Sullivan J.C., Roberson G.H. Central variant of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in systemic lupus erythematosus: New associations? Lupus. 2010;19:225–226. doi: 10.1177/0961203309345749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bălaşa R., Maier S., Baubec E.G., Bajkó Z., Bălaşa A. Cerebellar and brainstem variant of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. Acta Neurol. Belg. 2015;115:401–403. doi: 10.1007/s13760-014-0370-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ball A.M., Rayi A., Gustafson M. A Rare Association of Hypomagnesemia and Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES) Cureus. 2023;15:e41572. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bandeo L., Rausch A., Saucedo M., Chertcoff A., Cejas L.L., Roca C.U., Pacha S., Pardal M.F., Reisin R., Bonardo P. Convexity Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Secondary to Adalidumab in a Patient with Ulcerative Colitis. J. Vasc. Interv. Neurol. 2018;10:62–64. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bansal S., Bansal R., Goyal M.K., Takkar A., Singh R., Singh P., Lal V. Clinical, Etiological and Imaging Profile of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome: A Prospective and Follow-Up Study. Ann. Indian. Acad. Neurol. 2020;23:182–188. doi: 10.4103/aian.AIAN_379_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Barnaure I., Horvath J., Lovblad K.O., Vargas M.I. Atypical brainstem presentation of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) J. Neuroradiol. 2014;41:143–144. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2013.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bing F., M'Biene S., Gay S. Brainstem Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome With Spinal Cord Involvement (PRES-SCI) Rev. Neurol. (Paris) 2020;176:874–877. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2020.01.354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Braatz V.L., Lorenzoni P.J., Kay C.S., Chula D.C., Scola R.H., Werneck L.C. Brainstem reversible leukoencephalopathy syndrome. Arq. Neuropsiquiatr. 2014;72:83–84. doi: 10.1590/0004-282X20130206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chakroun-Walha O., Bacha I., Frikha M., Ben Mahfoudh K., Rekik N. A rare case of acute posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome involving brainstem in a child. J. Acute Dis. 2016;5:521–523. doi: 10.1016/j.joad.2016.08.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chaudhari D.M., Renjen P.N., Goyal N., Mishra A. Central variant reversible encephalopathy syndrome. BMJ Case Rep. 2022;15:245636. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2021-245636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chen D.Y., Tseng Y.C., Hsu H.L., Huang Y.L., Chen C.J. Teaching neuroimages: Central variant of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. Neurology. 2014;82:e164. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chiang W.F., Chen P.T., Chen Y.L., Chen M.H. Atypical posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in a noncompliant hemodialysis patient: Case report and literature review. Hemodial. Int. 2019;23:e100–e103. doi: 10.1111/hdi.12735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chou M.-C., Lai P.-H., Yeh L.-R., Yuan M.-K., Liang H.-L., Chen C., Pan H.-B., Yang C.-F., Li J.-Y., Lo Y.-K. Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome: Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in 12 Cases. Kaohsiung J. Med. Sci. 2004;20:381–388. doi: 10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70174-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Decker D.A., Falchook A.D., Yachnis A.T., Waters M.F. Radiographic and pathologic findings in an atypical brainstem variant of reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome. Neurologist. 2009;15:364–366. doi: 10.1097/NRL.0b013e3181951ac7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Deguchi I.M.D., Uchino A.M.D., Suzuki H.M.D., Tanahashi N.M.D. Malignant Hypertension with Reversible Brainstem Hypertensive Encephalopathy and Thrombotic Microangiopathy. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2012;21:915.e7–915.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2012.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dhawan S.R., Goswami J.N., Suthar R., Dayal D., Vyas S., Singhi P.D. A Child with Central Variant Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome. Neuropediatrics. 2019;50:66–67. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Di Stefano V., Rispoli M.G., Onofrj M., De Angelis M.V. Tumour-like presentation of atypical posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome with prominent brainstem involvement. BMJ Case Rep. 2020;13:231687. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2019-231687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Doi Y., Kimura F., Fujiyama T., Fujimura C., Nishina T., Sato T., Hosokawa T., Uehara H., Ishida S., Hanafusa T. Hypertensive brainstem encephalopathy without parieto-occipital lesion—Two case reports. Neurol. Med.-Chir. 2006;46:75–79. doi: 10.2176/nmc.46.75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Fujii N., Fujii H., Matsuki M., Doi S., Isozaki T., Watanabe Y., Nakamata A., Fujita A., Mori H. Optic pathway involvement in the posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: A case report and review of the literature. Radiol. Case Rep. 2023;18:3769–3772. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2023.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gowan J.M., Liu A. Isolated pan-pontine posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in a patient with uncontrolled hypertension. Clin. Case Rep. 2019;7:32–36. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.1888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Grossbach A.J., Abel T.J., Hodis B., Wassef S.N., Greenlee J.D.W. Hypertensive posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome causing posterior fossa edema and hydrocephalus. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2014;21:207–211. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2013.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hama R., Oshikawa H. Brainstem Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome. Intern. Med. 2019;58:2901–2902. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.2784-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Han N., Sun Z., Zhou C., Shen Y., Li G., Wang J. Central-variant posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome with bilateral corticospinal tract involvement: A case report. Acta Neurol. Belg. 2021;121:265–268. doi: 10.1007/s13760-020-01394-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hayashi Y., Hashida T., Yazaki M., Uchida T., Watanabe E. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) of the isolated brainstem. Clin. Case Rep. 2022;10:e05712. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.5712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hebant B., Guegan-Massardier E., Triquenot-Bagan A., Ozkul-Wermester O. Atypical MRI presentation of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome with predominant brainstem involvement. Acta Neurol. Belg. 2019;119:123–125. doi: 10.1007/s13760-018-1055-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Jesrani G., Gupta S., Arya Y., Syal A., Gupta M. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Induced Central Variant of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome: A Rare Association. Cureus. 2021;13:e13431. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Jia L.J., Qu Z.Z., Zhang X.Q., Tian Y.J., Wang Y. Uremic encephalopathy with isolated brainstem involvement revealed by magnetic resonance image: A case report. BMC Neurol. 2017;17:154. doi: 10.1186/s12883-017-0936-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kachi S., Nomura T., Yamada K., Oshima Y., Ura S. Atypical posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome associated with Sjögren's syndrome: A case report. Rinsho Shinkeigaku. 2023;63:159–162. doi: 10.5692/clinicalneurol.cn-001809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Katano K., Kakuchi Y., Nakashima A., Nakahama K., Kawano M. Apparent diffusion coefficient map based on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging is useful in diagnosing the brainstem variant of reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome with uremia. Clin. Exp. Nephrol. 2010;14:479–482. doi: 10.1007/s10157-010-0293-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kitaguchi H., Tomimoto H., Miki Y., Yamamoto A., Terada K., Satoi H., Kanda M., Fukuyama H. A brainstem variant of reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome. Neuroradiology. 2005;47:652–656. doi: 10.1007/s00234-005-1399-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Lamotte G., Lenka A. Brainstem Predominant Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome. Neurol. India. 2021;69:536–537. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.314564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lee S.W., Lee S.J. Central-Variant Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome with Albuminocytologic Dissociation. Case Rep. Neurol. 2018;10:29–33. doi: 10.1159/000486444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Liu C., Cao J., Su Z., Xu S. Isolated brainstem involvement in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: A case report and review of the literature. Int. J. Neurosci. 2019;129:808–813. doi: 10.1080/00207454.2018.1561452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Maciel R., Nzwalo H., Palma R., Martins A., Shamassa M., Pizhin D. The Resolution of Central Variant of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome. Neurohospitalist. 2015;5:91–92. doi: 10.1177/1941874414557082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Malhotra K., Mazumder R., Blanco M.B., Liebeskind D.S. Atypical case of central-variant posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. Acta Neurol. Belg. 2017;117:413–415. doi: 10.1007/s13760-016-0686-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Maier S., Monica C., Romaniuc A., Andone S., Bălaşa R. Central-variant posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in a young patient with systemic lupus erythematosus. Acta Neurol. Belg. 2019;119:269–271. doi: 10.1007/s13760-018-1046-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Maruyama H., Fujikawa H., Takimiya R., Sato H. Simultaneous Presentation of Brainstem and Cerebellar Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome With Acute Cerebral Infarction. Cureus. 2023;15:e34843. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Matsumoto N., Ogawa T., Hishikawa N., Takao Y., Fujii S. Dramatic Amelioration in Serial Magnetic Resonance Imaging in an "Isolated Brainstem" Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome Case. Yonago Acta Med. 2023;66:297–299. doi: 10.33160/yam.2023.05.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.McCarron M.O., McKinstry C.S. Vanishing brainstem edema. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2008;17:156–157. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2007.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Moosa A.N., Eagam M., Moodley M. Reversible brainstem edema due to hypertensive encephalopathy in an 8-year-old girl. J. Child. Neurol. 2011;26:1033–1035. doi: 10.1177/0883073811399802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Nagato M., Takahashi Y., Yoshioka M., Nambu M. A case of hypertensive encephalopathy with extensive spinal lesions on MRI. Brain Dev. 2010;32:598–601. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2009.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Nanba T., Kashimura H., Saura H., Takeda M. Subarachnoid hemorrhage due to ruptured intracranial aneurysm following posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. J. Neurosci. Rural. Pract. 2016;7:440–442. doi: 10.4103/0976-3147.182767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Navarro-Ballester A., Revert-Espí R. Unusual Presentation of a Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome With Brainstem Involvement and Subarachnoid Haemorrhage. Cureus. 2021;13:e16295. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Ocek L., Sener U., Demirtas B.S., Ozcelik M.M., Oztekin O., Zorlu Y. Central-Variant Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy due to Sulfasalazine: A Case Report. Med. Princ. Pract. 2015;24:578–580. doi: 10.1159/000437386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Ohashi E., Hayakawa I., Tsutsumi Y., Kamei K., Ide K., Abe Y. Central-variant posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in an infant with mid-aortic syndrome: A rare case of symmetric basal ganglia lesions. Radiol. Case Rep. 2022;17:3475–3480. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2022.07.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Onomura H., Shimizu T., Suzuki J., Nakai N., Teramachi Y., Tomonori K., Akiguchi I., Ito Y. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome presenting with thrombotic microangiopathy triggered by malignant hypertension: A case report and literature review. BMJ Neurol. Open. 2022;4:e000296. doi: 10.1136/bmjno-2022-000296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Osman Y., Imam Y.Z., Salem K., Al-Hail H., Uthman B., Deleu D. Isolated Brainstem Involvement in a Patient with Hypertensive Encephalopathy. Case Rep. Neurol. Med. 2013;2013:540947. doi: 10.1155/2013/540947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Ou S., Xia L., Wang L., Xia L., Zhou Q., Pan S. Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome With Isolated Involving Infratentorial Structures. Front. Neurol. 2018;9:843. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Raya M., Nasir I., Liu A. Atypical presentation of cerebellar posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in a patient with HIV. Clin. Case Rep. 2020;8:262–264. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.2625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Resorlu M., Karatag O., Aylanc N., Ozturk M.O., Toprak C.A. Posterior reversible encephalopathy with brainstem involvement. Intern. Emerg. Med. 2018;13:455–457. doi: 10.1007/s11739-017-1759-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Sallah Y.H., Zubair A.S., Dewey J.J. Extensive Brainstem Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome in a Hemodialysis Non-Adherent Patient. Cureus. 2021;13:e14523. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Ribeiro S., Monteiro M., Moreira B., França M. Rare posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in a patient with HIV. BMJ Case Rep. 2013;2013:201495. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2013-201495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Ogaki K., Fukae J., Noda K., Fujishima K., Hattori N., Okuma Y. Blurred Vision With Acute Hypertension Indicating Hypertensive Brainstem Encephalopathy: Case Report. Neurol. Med. -Chir. 2009;49:625–630. doi: 10.2176/nmc.49.625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Sharma S., Gupta R., Sehgal R., Aggarwal K.C. Atypical presentation of posterior reversible encephalopathy: In a child with bilateral grade IV vesicoureteric reflux. J. Trop. Pediatr. 2014;60:331–333. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmu019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Shimizu Y., Tha K.K., Iguchi A., Cho Y., Yoshida A., Fujima N., Tsukahara A., Shirato H., Terae S. Isolated posterior fossa involvement in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. Neuroradiol. J. 2013;26:514–519. doi: 10.1177/197140091302600504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Srinivasan K.G., Balasubramanian P., Mayilvaganan K.R., Kannan U.N., Bilal M. Central variant of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome—A rare case report. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2017;11:TD01–TD02. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/23269.9682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Tan Y.Y., Tan K. Hypertensive brainstem encephalopathy: A diagnosis often overlooked. Clin. Med. (Lond.) 2019;19:511–513. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2019-0247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Tari Capone F., Candela S., Bozzao A., Orzi F. A new case of brainstem variant of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: Clinical and radiological features. Neurol. Sci. 2015;36:1263–1265. doi: 10.1007/s10072-014-1999-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Thambisetty M., Biousse V., Newman N.J. Hypertensive brainstem encephalopathy: Clinical and radiographic features. J. Neurol. Sci. 2003;208:93–99. doi: 10.1016/S0022-510X(02)00379-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Tortora F., Caranci F., Belfiore M.P., Manzi F., Pagliano P., Cirillo S. Brainstem variant of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: A case report. Neuroradiol. J. 2015;28:634–637. doi: 10.1177/1971400915609336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Tsutsumi M., Akimoto J., Nakajima N., Hashimoto R., Haraoka J. Two cases of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome resembling brainstem glioma. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2012;114:1062–1065. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.02.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Vaysman T., Xu P., Vartanian T., Michalak P., Pike K., Liu A. "Highlighting" red nuclei by atypical posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin. Case Rep. 2019;7:1404–1408. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.2245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Wakely S.L., Ditchfield A. Hypertensive encephalopathy: A rare case of isolated pons involvement. Clin. Radiol. Extra. 2005;60:E53–E56. doi: 10.1016/j.cradex.2005.01.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Wittgrove C., Kaur H., Siddiqui J.H. Atypical Variant of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome in the Setting of Renovascular Hypertension: Case Report and Review of Literature. Cureus. 2018;10:e3573. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Yamagami K., Maeda Y., Iihara K. Variant Type of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome Associated with Deep Brain Hemorrhage: Case Report and Review of the Literature. World Neurosurg. 2020;134:176–181. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.10.196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Yokoyama J., Yamaguchi H., Koge J., Matsushita T., Isobe N., Yamasaki R., Kira J.I. Brainstem posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in a case with Guillain–Barré syndrome. Clin. Exp. Neuroimmunol. 2019;10:267–271. doi: 10.1111/cen3.12530. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Zhang Y.X., Zheng Y., Zhang B.J., Zhang Y., Ding M.P., Zhang B.R. Variant Type of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome with Diffuse Cerebral White Matter and Brainstem Involvement Associated with Intracranial Hemorrhage. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2016;25:e233–e235. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.09.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.de Havenon A., Joos Z., Longenecker L., Shah L., Ansari S., Digre K. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome with spinal cord involvement. Neurology. 2014;83:2002–2006. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Milia A., Moller J., Pilia G., Mascia M.G., Marchi P., Mura M., Marrosu M.G. Spinal cord involvement during hypertensive encephalopathy: Clinical and radiological findings. J. Neurol. 2008;255:142–143. doi: 10.1007/s00415-008-0698-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Samara A., Berry B., Ghannam M. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome with isolated infratentorial involvement: A case report. Radiol. Case Rep. 2019;14:576–580. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2019.02.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Liu L., Dai D., Cao F., Zhang L., Wang X. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome with spinal cord involvement but without hemisphere lesions: A case report. Medicine. 2019;98:e13649. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Gocmen R., Ardicli D., Erarslan Y., Duzova A., Anlar B. Reversible Hypertensive Myelopathy-The Spinal Cord Variant of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome. Neuropediatrics. 2017;48:115–118. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1597612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Marrone L.C., Martins W.A., Brunelli J.P., Fussiger H., Carvalhal G.F., Filho J.R., Soder R.B., Schuck M., Viola F.S., Marrone A.C., et al. PRES with asymptomatic spinal cord involvement. Is this scenario more common than we know? Spinal Cord. Ser. Cases. 2016;2:15001. doi: 10.1038/scsandc.2015.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Chan P.K.J., Tse K.S., Fok W.S.E., Poon W.L. First case of neurofibromatosis with posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome showing spinal cord involvement. Indian. J. Radiol. Imaging. 2018;28:161–164. doi: 10.4103/ijri.IJRI_320_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Agarwal H., Sebastian L.J.D., Gaikwad S.B., Garg A., Mishra N.K. Spinal cord involvement and contrast enhancement in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. BJR Case Rep. 2016;2:20150326. doi: 10.1259/bjrcr.20150326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Choh N.A., Jehangir M., Rasheed M., Mira T., Ahmad I., Choh S. Involvement of the cervical cord and medulla in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. Ann. Saudi Med. 2011;31:90–92. doi: 10.4103/0256-4947.75790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Khokhar H.V., Choudhary P., Saxena S., Arif M. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome with spinal cord involvement (PRES-SCI): A case report. Ann. Indian. Acad. Neurol. 2016;19:134–136. doi: 10.4103/0972-2327.165456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Chen T.-Y., Wu T.-C., Ko C.-C., Feng I.J., Tsui Y.-K., Lin C.-J., Chen J.-H., Lin C.-P. Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Evaluation of the Supratentorial Brain Regions in Patients Diagnosed with Brainstem Variant of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome: A Preliminary Study. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2017;26:1560–1568. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.02.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Fitzgerald R.T., Samant R.S., Kumar M., Van Hemert R., Angtuaco E.J. Features of infratentorial-predominant posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. Acta Neurol. Belg. 2015;115:629–634. doi: 10.1007/s13760-015-0431-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.McKinney A.M., Short J., Truwit C.L., McKinney Z.J., Kozak O.S., SantaCruz K.S., Teksam M. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: Incidence of atypical regions of involvement and imaging findings. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2007;189:904–912. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Aygunes U., Sasmaz H.I., Arpaci T., Akbas T., Ozcan N., Antmen A.B. Clinical and Radiological Characteristics of Classical and Variant Type of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome on Prognosis Following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Pediatric Patients: A Single-Center Experience. Exp. Clin. Transplant. 2024;22:800–809. doi: 10.6002/ect.2024.0126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Srichawla B.S., Kipkorir V., Lalla R. Central-variant posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in association with adrenal insufficiency: A case report. Med. (Baltim.) 2025;104:e41625. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Yiş U., Karaoğlu P., Kurul S.H., Soylu A., Çakmakçi H., Kavukçu S. Posterior reversible leukoencephalopathy syndrome with spinal cord involvement in a 9-year-old girl. Brain Dev. 2016;38:154–157. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2015.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Brewer J., Owens M.Y., Wallace K., Reeves A.A., Morris R., Khan M., Lamarca B., Martin Jr J.N. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in 46 of 47 patients with eclampsia. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2013;208:468.e1–468.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Li Y.M.D.P., Gor D.M.D., Walicki D.M.T., Jenny D.R.N., Jones D.M.D., Barbour P.M.D., Castaldo J.M.D. Spectrum and Potential Pathogenesis of Reversible Posterior Leukoencephalopathy Syndrome. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2012;21:873–882. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Raman R., Devaramane R., Jagadish G.M., Chowdaiah S. Various Imaging Manifestations of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES) on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Pol. J. Radiol. 2017;82:64–70. doi: 10.12659/PJR.899960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Yoon S.D., Cho B.M., Oh S.M., Park S.H., Jang I.B., Lee J.Y. Clinical and radiological spectrum of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. J. Cerebrovasc. Endovasc. Neurosurg. 2013;15:206–213. doi: 10.7461/jcen.2013.15.3.206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Doi H., Yokote H., Uchihara T., Toru S. Bilateral Optic Nerve Edema in Central-variant Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome. Intern. Med. 2020;59:2333–2334. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.4919-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Fugate J.E., Claassen D.O., Cloft H.J., Kallmes D.F., Kozak O.S., Rabinstein A.A. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: Associated clinical and radiologic findings. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2010;85:427–432. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2009.0590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Rabinstein A.A., Mandrekar J., Merrell R., Kozak O.S., Durosaro O., Fugate J.E. Blood pressure fluctuations in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2012;21:254–258. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Srichawla B.S., Garcia-Dominguez M.A. Regional dynamic cerebral autoregulation across anterior and posterior circulatory territories: A detailed exploration and its clinical implications. World J. Crit. Care Med. 2024;13:97149. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v13.i4.97149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Srichawla B.S., Catton R.M., Lichtenberg A.A., Henninger N. Clinical characteristics and risk factors for bilateral lateral geniculate body pathology: A systematic review of the literature. Neurol. Sci. 2023;44:3481–3493. doi: 10.1007/s10072-023-06818-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Schwartz R.B. Hyperperfusion encephalopathies: Hypertensive encephalopathy and related conditions. Neurologist. 2002;8:22–34. doi: 10.1097/00127893-200201000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Beausang-Linder M., Bill A. Cerebral circulation in acute arterial hypertension--protective effects of sympathetic nervous activity. Acta Physiol. Scand. 1981;111:193–199. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1981.tb06724.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Singh T.D., Fugate J.E., Rabinstein A.A. Central pontine and extrapontine myelinolysis: A systematic review. Eur. J. Neurol. 2014;21:1443–1450. doi: 10.1111/ene.12571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Chen P.-R., Chen S.-P. Posterior reversible encephalopathy as the first manifestation of Bickerstaff's brainstem encephalitis. BMC Neurol. 2016;16:215. doi: 10.1186/s12883-016-0737-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article. Further enquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.




