Skip to main content
Neurology International logoLink to Neurology International
. 2025 Jul 21;17(7):113. doi: 10.3390/neurolint17070113

The Central Variant of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Bahadar S Srichawla 1,*, Maria A Garcia-Dominguez 1, Brian Silver 1
Editor: Marcello Moccia1
PMCID: PMC12298113  PMID: 40710916

Abstract

Background: The central variant of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (cvPRES) is an atypical subtype of PRES. Although no unifying definitions exists, it is most often characterized by vasogenic edema involving “central” structures, such as the brainstem, subcortical nuclei, and spinal cord, with relative sparing of the parieto-occipital lobes. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the PRISMA guidelines and was pre-registered on PROSPERO [CRD42023483806]. Both the Joanna Briggs Institute and New-Castle Ottawa scale were used for case reports and cohort studies, respectively. The meta-analysis was completed using R-Studio and its associated “metafor” package. Results: A comprehensive search in four databases yielded 70 case reports/series (n = 100) and 12 cohort studies. The meta-analysis revealed a pooled incidence rate of 13% (95% CI: 9–18%) for cvPRES amongst included cohort studies on PRES. Significant heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 71% and a τ 2 = 0.2046). The average age of affected individuals was 40.9 years, with a slightly higher prevalence in males (54%). The most common etiological factor was hypertension (72%). Fifty percent had an SBP >200 mmHg at presentation and a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 217.6 ± 40.82. Imaging revealed an increased T2 signal involving the brain stem (88%), most often in the pons (62/88; 70.45%), and 18/100 (18%) cases of PRES with spinal cord involvement (PRES-SCI). Management primarily involved blood pressure reduction, with adjunctive therapies for underlying causes such as anti-seizure medications or hemodialysis. The MAP between isolated PRES-SCI and cvPRES without spinal cord involvement did not show significant differences (p = 0.5205). Favorable outcomes were observed in most cases, with a mortality rate of only 2%. Conclusions: cvPRES is most often associated with higher blood pressure compared to prior studies with typical PRES. The pons is most often involved. Despite the severity of blood pressure and critical brain stem involvement, those with cvPRES have favorable functional outcomes and a lower mortality rate than typical PRES, likely attributable to reversible vasogenic edema without significant neuronal dysfunction.

Keywords: PRES, central variant, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, systematic review, meta-analysis, posterior reversible leukoencephalopathy syndrome

1. Introduction

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a neurological disorder characterized by a variety of symptoms, including headaches, altered mental status, seizures, and visual disturbances. It is most identified through characteristic radiological findings, predominantly involving the posterior regions of the cerebral cortex and subcortical white matter [1]. Although the exact pathophysiology of PRES remains incompletely understood, it is thought to be related to endothelial dysfunction, leading to vasogenic edema. In recent years, a variant of this condition, known as central-variant PRES (cvPRES), has been increasingly recognized. Unlike the classical form of PRES, which predominantly affects the posterior regions of the brain, central-variant PRES is characterized by the involvement of central brain structures, including the basal ganglia, thalamus, brainstem, and/or spinal cord. This variation presents unique diagnostic challenges and may have different clinical implications compared to the typical form of PRES [2]. However, no unified consensus on the definition of cvPRES has been established.

cvPRES raises several critical questions about its epidemiology, clinical presentation, risk factors, pathophysiology, and outcomes. While there is growing literature on this subject, there has been no comprehensive synthesis of the evidence to date. Misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis can lead to inappropriate management, potentially resulting in adverse outcomes. Understanding the distinct features of central-variant PRES, including its triggers, clinical course, and response to treatment, is crucial for optimizing patient care. Additionally, the location of vasogenic edema within the posterior fossa and brainstem brings forth the concern for life-threatening herniation syndromes, which may require decompressive craniectomy and other neurosurgical interventions.

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aim to provide a detailed analysis of the characteristics of cvPRES, comparing them with the classical form of the syndrome where relevant. We will evaluate aspects such as demographics, clinical manifestations, precipitating factors, imaging findings, medical and surgical management strategies, purported pathophysiological mechanisms, and outcomes. By doing so, we seek to offer a comprehensive overview of this condition, contributing to better recognition, diagnosis, and management of patients with central-variant PRES.

2. Methods

This study was exempt from an institutional review board, as it involves analysis of de-identified data that have already been collected. Therefore, it will not be possible to trace the data presented back to individual patients.

2.1. Search Strategy

A PRISMA directed systematic review and meta-analysis were planned and prospectively registered on PROSPERO [CRD42023483806] and Open Science Framework (OSF) [3]. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across four electronic databases, including PubMed/PubMed Central/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Hinari. The search strategy was designed to include a combination of keywords and MeSH terms related to “Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome,” “PRES,” “central variant,” “brainstem variant,” and related terminologies. The complete search string and terminologies for each database are included in Table 1. The search was restricted to studies published in English from the inception of the database. Reference lists of identified articles were manually searched to ensure the inclusion of additional relevant studies. Both backwards and forward citation tracking was utilized, and a gray literature search was completed by reviewing the first 100 results on Google Scholar and Open Gray.

Table 1.

Databases queried including the search string utilized.

Database Search String
PubMed/PubMedCentral/MEDLINE (“Posterior Leukoencephalopathy Syndrome” OR “Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome” OR “PRES”) AND (“central variant” OR “central variant” OR “brainstem” OR “spinal cord”)
ScienceDirect (“Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome” OR “PRES”) AND (“central variant” OR “brainstem” OR “spinal cord”)
Scopus (“Posterior Leukoencephalopathy Syndrome” OR “Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome” OR “PRES”) AND (“central-variant” OR “central variant” OR “brainstem” OR “spinal cord”)
Hinari (“Posterior Leukoencephalopathy Syndrome” OR “Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome” OR “PRES”) AND (“central variant” OR “central variant” OR “brainstem” OR “spinal cord”)

2.2. Eligibility Criteria

Studies were included if they met the following criteria: (1) patients diagnosed with central-variant PRES, as defined by imaging criteria, which include increased T2-weighted signal involving central structures (e.g., basal ganglia, thalamus, brainstem, cerebellum, and spinal cord) in the absence of significant cortical involvement; (2) articles reporting on clinical features, imaging findings, management, and outcomes; and (3) study designs including randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, and case reports/series. All cases were reviewed by board-eligible or certified adult neurologists. Articles only of the English language were included. Reviews, editorials, commentaries, and studies with insufficient data on central-variant PRES were excluded. Records published in non-peer reviewed journals were not included in the analysis.

2.3. Data Extraction

First, the aggregate records from the initial search were exported to EndNote 21, and duplicate records were removed. Next, two reviewers (B.S.S. & M.A.G-D.) independently extracted data using the Rayyan QCRI web platform. Extracted information included study characteristics (author, year of publication, study design), patient demographics (age, gender), clinical presentations, imaging findings, management strategies, and outcomes. Discrepancies between reviewers were resolved through discussion or by consulting a third reviewer (B.S.).

2.4. Quality and Risk of Bias Assessment

The quality and risk of bias assessment was assessed using appropriate tools: the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) assessment tool for case reports/series and the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale for observational studies. The JBI tool consists of eight items addressing different aspects of the methodological quality of case reports, including precise patient demographics, accurate diagnosis, objective measurements of intervention outcomes, and follow-up information. The quality and risk of bias assessment were conducted by two authors (B.S.S., M.A.G-D.); a third author was consulted (B.S.) for any discrepancy between reviewers.

2.5. Statistical Analysis and Meta Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the extracted data. Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and as frequencies and percentages for categorical variables. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis to estimate the incidence rate of cvPRES from cohort studies. The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to assess for normality. An unpaired t-test was used when comparing MAPs between cvPRES without spinal cord involvement (SCI) and PRES-SCI. The meta-analysis was conducted using R-Studio, employing the “metafor” package to pool the incidence rate across studies. We assessed heterogeneity among studies using the I2 statistic. To visualize the results, we generated forest plots to display the individual and pooled incidence rate with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Funnel plots were used to assess publication bias, and Baujat plots were constructed to identify studies that contributed significantly to heterogeneity.

2.6. Data Validation

Although the data presented here and their corresponding analysis is declassified, the data sheet and document will be stored on a secure password-protected hard drive indefinitely. The ethical standards outlined by the Declaration of Helsinki will be upheld. No attempt will be made to identify individual patients.

3. Results

3.1. Search Results

A total of 1120 records were obtained. After removing duplicates, 912 records had their abstracts and titles screened. A total of 191 records were reviewed and assessed for eligibility for inclusion in the qualitative and quantitative synthesis. A PRISMA-guided flow diagram of record assessment is provided in Figure 1. Single case records and case series are presented in Table 2 [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90]. Cohort studies are included in Table 3 [7,18,21,26,62,91,92,93,94,95].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

PRISMA flow diagram of included studies.

3.2. Clinical and Radiographic Characteristics

A total of 70 records with 100 patients are included in the single-case analysis. A total of 12 cohort studies are included. The average age of reported cases was 40.9. Fifty-four of one hundred cases occurred in men and 46/100 in women. Fourteen cases were reported in patients < 18 years of age. The most reported medical history include hypertension (40/100; 40% of cases), chronic kidney disease/end stage renal disease (ESRD) (13/100; 13%), acute kidney injury (4/100; 4%), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (2/100), systemic lupus erythematosus (6/100; 6%), and other immunological conditions, including Sjogren disease, polyarteritis nodosa, and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (4/100; 4%). One case of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) (1), neurofibromatosis type-1 (NF-1), and testicular carcinoma on bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin were observed.

The systolic blood pressure (SBP) on arrival ranged from 120 to 270 mmHg (median: 200). Fifty out of one hundred cases had an SBP >200 mmHg. The mean SBP was 202 ± 37.58 mmHg (range: 120–270), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 124 mmHg ± 27.35 mmHg (range: 40–220), pulse pressure (PP) 77.7 ± 22.89 (range: 36–142), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) 217.6 ± 40.82 (range: 85.3–326.66). Nineteen cases had seizures, 42/100 had headaches, and 21/100 had visual disturbance, with alteration in mental status in 14/100, three with aphasia, and one with Anton-Babinski syndrome, and 6/100 had decreased level of consciousness. Neurological symptoms localizing to the posterior circulation (e.g., dysarthria, dysphagia, dysmetria, nausea, vomiting, nystagmus, vertigo, lower cranial nerve palsy, obtundation/comatose, etc.) were seen in 30% of cases.

MRI findings included T2/FLAIR hyperintensities or vasogenic edema involving the brainstem in 88/100 cases: (62/88 pons, 21/88 midbrain, 22/88 medulla). Additionally, vasogenic edema was observed in other areas, including 38/100 cerebellum/cerebellar peduncle, 21/100 basal ganglia, 15/100 thalamus, and 18/100 cases involving the spinal cord (18/18 cervical cord lesion, 5/18 thoracic cord lesion). Eighteen percent of cases reported diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) hyperintensities with corresponding apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping hypointensities. Four reported susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) hypointensities involving the bilateral thalami (1), basal ganglia (2) and pons (1), and cerebral white matter (1). These SWI findings are suggestive of chronic microbleeds due to hypertension. Shimizu et al. reported a case of pediatric T-ALL with significant vasogenic edema, diffusion restriction, and contrast enhancement within the cerebellum [68]. Yamagami et al. reported a case of central-variant PRES with associated hemorrhagic transformation involving the basal ganglia and thalamus [78]. Zhang et al. presented a case of brainstem PRES involving the pons with hemorrhagic conversion [80]. de Havenon et al. presented two cases of spinal cord PRES, which showed a central confluent lesion involving the entire spinal cord [81]. Agarwal et al. reported a pediatric case of PRES-SCI with leptomeningeal enhancement [88].

Cerebrospinal fluid analysis when completed was often normal; six cases reported elevated protein. Kachi et al. reported a case of central PRES secondary to Sjogren disease, which showed elevated SSA/B antibodies as well as elevated oligoclonal bands in CSF [41]. Decker et al. completed a cerebellar biopsy on a patient with hypertension-related central PRES and found fibrinoid change and perivascular infiltrates of mature lymphocytes [27]. The case by Yis et al. demonstrated an elevated IgG index of 0.9 (normal: <0.7) [96].

Medical management most often included blood pressure reduction and seizure management. Thirteen cases required renal-replacement therapy (RRT), one case required VA-ECMO after a cardiac arrest, one individual required plasma exchange for thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, and four patients were treated with intravenous methylprednisolone, often with an underlying autoimmune condition (i.e., SLE and Sjogren disease). Three cases required emergent external ventricular drain (EVD) placement, two individuals required suboccipital decompressive craniectomy, and there was one case of high cervical (C1) laminectomy. One patient was treated with erythropoietin, ferrous sulfate, and bicarbonate for metabolic acidosis from obstructive nephropathy leading to uremia [40]. The patient described by Vaysman et al. who was hypertensive and had SLE was treated with plasmapheresis [75]. The case by Shimizu et al. showed significant hypertension in a 10-year-old girl (>99th percentile) on a chemotherapy regimen for T-ALL including four doses of intravenous vincristine (1.5 mg/m2 ) and daunorubicin (30 mg/m2) given every week, eight doses of intramuscular L-asparaginase (5000 units/m2) administered every third day, daily oral dexamethasone (10 mg/m2/day for three weeks and subsequent taper), and a single dose of intrathecal cytarabine (30 mg), methotrexate (12 mg), and prednisolone (10 mg) administered on day five of treatment [68]. Yokoyama et al. reported a case of central-variant PRES secondary to blood pressure fluctuations from Guillain Barre syndrome (GBS) treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) [79].

The most common purported causes were hypertension (72/100; 72%), eclampsia (2), renal failure/kidney disease (4), SLE (4), Sjogren disease (1) hypomagnesemia (1), immunotherapy (1), sulfasalazine (1), and GBS (1). The case by Chaudhari et al. reported central PRES in a one-week postpartum woman with no clear etiology [23]. The case by Sharma et al. reported a 7-year-old boy with grade IV vesicoureteral reflex with hypertension [67]. Chan et al. reported the case of a 4-year-old boy with hypertension from NF-1-related renal artery stenosis with prominent vasogenic edema involving the pons, medulla, cerebellar hemispheres, and complete spinal cord (cervical > thoracic) [87]. Marrone et al. reported a case of central-variant PRES due to hypertension secondary to renal-artery stenosis from paraaortic lymph node dissection [86]. The pediatric PRES-SCI case by Agarwal et al. occurred because of hypertension secondary to renal artery stenosis [88]. The PRES-SCI case presented by Choh et al. occurred due to hypertension from IgA nephropathy [89]. Srichawla et al. reported a case of cvPRES due to rapidly fluctuating blood pressure presumedly from adrenal insufficiency [95]. Most cases showed clinical and radiographic improvement in 1–2 months from the initial diagnosis. We report a mortality rate of 2%; all cases succumbed to the illness and died within the same hospitalization.

3.3. Retrospective Studies

Ahn et al. (2004) completed a single-center retrospective analysis of PRES and reported a prevalence of 4/37, 10.8% of the central-variant of PRES. Bansal et al. (2020) described 22 cases of PRES, wherein 40% had radiographic involvement of the cerebellum, 15% of the basal ganglia, 10% of the deep white matter, and 10% of the brainstem [7,18]. Brewer et al. (2013) performed a 10-year retrospective analysis on the neuroimaging findings of 47 women who had eclampsia. Eleven individuals (23%) were reported to involve the basal ganglia and cerebellum, five of whom were antepartum, and six were postpartum [97]. Chen et al. (2017) performed a retrospective analysis and found 11 individuals with the central variant of PRES (seven male and four female), with a median age of 60.0 (range 40.0–63.5). The reported etiology was hypertension in all eleven cases [91]. Chou et al. (2004) performed a retrospective analysis of 12 patients with clinical radiographic findings consistent with PRES [26]. Of the reported cases, 1/12 had radiographic findings consistent with the central variant (case 25). Fitzgerald et al. (2015) completed a retrospective review from 2007–2012 and identified 6/80 (7.5%) cases of central-variant PRES [92]. They determined a higher prevalence of extreme hypertension and renal dysfunction compared to the non-central variant [92]. Li et al. (2012) completed a retrospective study of 59 cases of PRES and reported the central variant occurring in five patients (brainstem n = 2; basal ganglia n = 3) [98]. McKinney et al. (2013) completed a retrospective review of 124 cases of PRES and determined 5/124 (4%) to have the central variant [2]. McKinney et al. (2007) completed another retrospective study of 76 PRES cases and determined that 30.3% involved the thalamus and 34.2% the cerebellum; 18.4% were within the brainstem, and 11.8% involved the basal ganglia [93]. Raman et al. (2017) completed a retrospective review of 92 patients with PRES and identified a total of 22 individuals with predominant brainstem and cerebellar involvement [99]. Yoon et al. completed a retrospective analysis of 16 PRES patients and found atypical radiographic findings including four episodes within the basal ganglia, three in the brainstem, two in the cerebellum, and three in the thalamus [100]. Aygunes et al. completed a retrospective review of 101 pediatric patients with PRES who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplant [94]. They found a 15.8% (16/101) incidence of the central variant. They also noted a higher mortality rate (n = 10, 62.5%) compared to those with the typical variant (n = 5, 5.9%) [94].

3.4. PRES-SCI

A direct unpaired two-tailed t-test was performed to compare the mean arterial pressure (MAP) between isolated PRES with spinal cord involvement (PRES-SCI) and central-variant PRES without spinal cord involvement. Prior to the t-test, normality of the data was confirmed using the Shapiro–Wilk test, yielding W = 0.9329 and p = 0.2433, which passed the normality threshold with an α = 0.05. The unpaired t-test revealed no statistically significant difference in MAP between the two groups (t = 0.6453, p = 0.5205), suggesting that MAP levels are comparable in these presentations of PRES with spinal cord involvement. However, this may be limited by the smaller sample size in the PRES-SCI group (18 vs. 85).

3.5. Meta-Analysis of Incidence Rate

The meta-analysis calculated the pooled incidence rate of the observed events (cvPRES) across the included studies. A total of eight studies that provided enough information on the incidence of the central variant of PRES was included in the quantitative synthesis. Using a random-effects model, the pooled incidence rate was estimated at 13% (CI: 9–18%) (Figure 2). Heterogeneity among studies was substantial, with an I2 = 71% and a τ2 = 0.2046. The heterogeneity was statistically significant (p < 0.01), indicating considerable variation in effect sizes across studies. To assess potential publication bias, a funnel plot was generated, and a Baujat plot was used to identify influential studies contributing to heterogeneity (Figure 3 and Figure 4).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Forest plot depicting the pooled incidence rate of events across studies using both fixed-effects and random-effects models. Individual study proportions with 95% confidence intervals are shown alongside their respective weights under both models. The random-effects pooled estimate is 0.13 (95% CI: 0.09–0.18), indicating moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 71%, τ2 = 0.2046, p < 0.01). The diamond represents the overall effect size and its confidence interval for the random-effects model [2,7,26,92,94,97,98,99].

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Funnel plot assessing publication bias in the included studies. The x-axis represents the logit-transformed proportion of events, while the y-axis represents the standard error. Open circles indicate individual studies, with the dashed diagonal lines representing the 95% confidence interval around the pooled effect estimate. Symmetry in the plot suggests minimal publication bias; however, asymmetry could indicate potential bias or heterogeneity in the included studies. Filled circles represent imputed studies added using the trim-and-fill method to adjust for potential bias [2,7,26,92,94,97,98,99].

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Baujat plot illustrating the contribution of individual studies to overall heterogeneity and their influence on the pooled effect size. The x-axis represents the contribution of each study to overall heterogeneity, while the y-axis indicates the study’s influence on the overall result. Studies located further from the origin exhibit a higher impact on heterogeneity and/or the pooled effect. In this analysis, McKinney et al. (2013) and Raman et al. (2017) demonstrate notable contributions to heterogeneity and influence on the pooled estimate, suggesting their potential role in driving variability within the meta-analysis [2,7,26,92,94,97,98,99].

3.6. Quality and Risk of Bias Assessment of Case Reports/Series

The methodological quality and risk of bias for the included studies were assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tool. Of the studies evaluated, the majority (n = 79) achieved a perfect score (8/8), indicating high methodological rigor and a low risk of bias. These studies consistently satisfied all eight appraisal criteria, demonstrating robustness in study design and reporting. Three studies received scores of 6/8 or 5/8, reflecting a moderate risk of bias due to unmet criteria in areas such as follow-up completeness or consideration of confounding factors. These studies include Arai et al. (1997), Braatz et al. (2014), and Matsumoto et al. (2014) [10,21,51]. Two studies (Doi et al., Resorlu et al.) scored 4/8, corresponding to a high risk of bias and potential limitations in methodological quality (Table 3) [63,101]. Overall, the quality assessment demonstrates that the included studies are predominantly of high methodological quality, with a small subset requiring caution in interpretation due to moderate to high risks of bias.

3.7. Quality and Risk of Bias Assessment of Cohort Studies

The quality of included cohort studies was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS), which evaluates selection (maximum 4 points), comparability (maximum 2 points), and outcomes (maximum 3 points). A total score of 9 indicates the highest quality. Many of the studies (n = 10) achieved scores of 8 or 9, indicating robust methodological quality. Notably, Chen et al. (2017) scored the maximum 9 points, meeting all criteria across selection, comparability, and outcomes [91]. Other studies, including Ahn et al. (2004), Brewer et al., and Chou et al. (2004), consistently scored 8, reflecting strong performance in most domains [7,26,97]. One study, Bansal et al. (2020), scored 4 points [18]. While it demonstrated adequacy in selection (3 points) and outcome (1 point), it lacked comparability between cohorts, which significantly impacted its total score (Table 4).

4. Discussion

The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis provide a comprehensive understanding of the clinical, radiographic, and management characteristics of cvPRES, a rare but significant subtype of PRES. With an overall pooled incidence rate of 13% (95% CI: 9–18%) across cohort studies, our results underscore the clinical importance of recognizing this variant in settings where its presentation may deviate from the typical posterior-predominant PRES. In a study by Fugate et al., the mean peak systolic blood pressure among PRES patients was 199 mm Hg (range: 160–268 mm Hg), and the mean peak diastolic blood pressure was 109 mm Hg (range: 60–144 mm Hg) [102]. Another study by Rabinstein et al. reported that approximately 75% of PRES patients presented with hypertension, indicating that while elevated blood pressure is common, it is not a universal finding in PRES cases [103]. They reported a mean SBP of 182 ± 20 mm Hg and MAP 124 ± 15 [103]. In our cohort of 100 patients with cvPRES, we reported a higher mean SBP and MAP at 202 ± 37.58 mmHg and 217.6 ± 40.82, respectively.

The higher blood pressure observed in cvPRES compared to typical PRES may suggest a distinct pathophysiological mechanism potentially driven by differential vascular autoregulatory thresholds in central brain structures. Unlike the posterior cortex, which has relatively low autoregulatory capacity and is prone to vasogenic edema at moderate elevations in blood pressure, the brainstem, basal ganglia, and thalamus may require more extreme hypertension to surpass their autoregulatory limits [104]. This could explain the selective involvement of these regions in central-variant PRES. Furthermore, the proximity of these structures to deep perforating arteries with limited collateral flow may exacerbate vulnerability under conditions of severe hypertension, leading to more profound endothelial dysfunction, breakdown of the blood-brain barrier, and vasogenic edema [105]. Excessive adrenergic stimulation may amplify vascular permeability and inflammatory responses in central brain regions. Additionally, the co-occurrence of microvascular compromise or pre-existing structural abnormalities, such as chronic hypertension-induced arteriolosclerosis, could heighten susceptibility to central-variant manifestations. However, these hypotheses need to be supported by original studies.

In our dataset, the pons was predominantly affected, which may be attributed to several pathophysiological mechanisms underlying reversible pontine edema. The pons, a critical structure within the brainstem, is particularly susceptible to fluctuations in blood pressure due to its unique vascular supply and limited sympathetic innervation [106]. Acute hypertension can overwhelm the autoregulatory capacity of the pontine vasculature, leading to endothelial dysfunction and increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier [107]. Furthermore, the anatomical configuration of the pons, with its dense arrangement of neural tracts and nuclei, may predispose it to the accumulation of interstitial fluid during episodes of increased vascular permeability [52]. The resultant edema can disrupt neural conduction, leading to the clinical manifestations observed in patients with pontine involvement. Most notably, patients with cvPRES rarely reported diffusion restriction or cytotoxic edema within the pons. Thus, the impaired autoregulation does not lead to irreversible neuronal injury and permanent neurological deficits, which may be seen in a pontine stroke or central pontine myelinolysis [108].

Table 2.

Single-patient records included in the systematic review and meta-analysis.

Case No. Author Publication Type Year Age Gender Risk Factors Blood Pressure Clinical Sequelae CT Findings MRI Findings Vessel Imaging CSF Examination Treatment Purported Cause Outcomes
1 Abe et al. [4] Case Report 2014 59 M HTN, ESRD 181/81 mmHg Headache, nausea, dysarthria, tic, and weakness involving the bilateral arms and legs Hypodense lesion involving pons and cerebellum T2/FLAIR hyperintense lesion involving the pons and cerebellum NA Normal Blood Pressure management and RRT (HD) HTN Radiographic and clinical improvement in 13 days
2 Abraham et al. [5] Case Report 2020 25 F SLE, Lupus nephritis (grade IV) SBP 190 mmHg GTC seizure, direction-changing torsional nystagmus, horizontal ophthalmoplegia, and
symmetric weakness
T2/FLAIR hyperintense and ADC hypointense lesion involving bilateral paramedian thalamic and
pontine hyperintensity. SWI punctate hypointensity within the
areas of restricted diffusion in the bilateral thalami and
pons, compatible with microhemorrhages
MRA: Subtle short
segment stenoses involving bilateral external carotid
arteries, the right V4 segment, and the right P2 segment.
Normal Blood pressure management and RRT HTN Clinical improvement at 3 months. SWI imaging showed persistent punctate microhemorrhages in the bilateral thalami and pons.
3 Abusabha et al. [6] Case Report 2017 52 M HTN SBP 260 mmHg Headaches, vertigo, blurred vision NA T2/FLAIR and DWI hyperintensities involving the bilateral cerebellum, pons, and occipital lobe NA NA EVD insertion and suboccipital craniectomy and C1 HTN Radiographic and clinical improvement in 3 weeks
4 Ahn et al. [7] Retrospective Study 2004 29 F NA 155/100 mmHg Generalized tonic clonic seizures NA T2/FLAIR hyperintensities and ADC hypointensities involving bilateral basal ganglia NA NA Blood pressure management Postpartum eclampsia Radiographic and clinical resolution
5 Ahn et al. [7] Retrospective Study 2004 28 F NA 180/120 mmHg Generalized tonic clonic seizures NA T2/FLAIR hyperintensities and ADC hypointensities involving bilateral basal ganglia and thalami NA NA Blood pressure management
Eclampsia Radiographic and clinical resolution
6 Ahn et al. [7] Retrospective Study 2004 41 M HTN, CKD (diabetic nephropathy) 240/140 mmHg Alteration in mental status NA T2/FLAIR hyperintensities and ADC hypointensities involving bilateral pons NA NA Blood pressure management HTN Radiographic and clinical resolution
7 Ahn et al. [7] Retrospective Study 2004 32 F HTN, CKD 190/100 mmHg Alteration in mental status NA T2/FLAIR hyperintensities and ADC hypointensities involving bilateral pons NA NA Blood pressure management HTN Radiographic and clinical resolution
8 Akhondian et al. [8] Case Report 2022 4 F Secondary hyperaldosteronism, HTN. 180/110 mmHg Alteration in mental status and status epilepticus NA T2/FLAIR and DWI hyperintensities in splenium of the corpus callosum, in cerebellum, brainstem, and cervical spinal cord NA NA Seizure management (phenytoin, and phenobarbital). Blood pressure management (hydralazine, furosemide, and captopril). HTN from secondary hyperaldosteronism Radiographic and clinical resolution within one month
9 Andour et al. [9] Case Series 2023 59 F Diabetes, HTN 170/100 mmHg Alteration in mental status Normal T2/FLAIR, DWI hyperintense and ADC hypointense lesions involving temporal and occipital regions, in
corpus callosum, in the brainstem and cerebellum
NA NA Blood pressure management HTN Clinical resolution of symptoms
10 Andour et al. [9] Case Series 2023 34 M Kidney failure NA GTC seizure NA T2/FLAIR hyperintensity left putamen with gadolinium enhancement NA NA HD Renal failure Clinical and radiographic resolution of symptoms
11 Arai et al. [10] Case Report 1997 57 M CKD, polyarteritis nodosa 200/140 mmHg GTC seizures Parietal lobe hypodensity T2/FLAIR hyperintensities emporo-occipital white matter, the thalamus, the posterior limbs of the internal capsules, the external capsules, the midbrain, the pons, and the middle cerebellar peduncles NA NA Blood pressure management HTN NA
12 Aridon et al. [11] Case Report 2011 53 M Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura 260/180 mmHg Disturbances of gait, dizziness, urinary incontinence and
lethargy
Enlargement of the
lateral and third ventricles
T2/FLAIR hyperintensities involving white matter of cerebral and cerebellar hemispheres
with the involvement of midbrain and cerebellar peduncles
NA Elevated protein (77 mg/dL) Blood pressure management (nitroprusside, furosemide, and
clonidine) and plasma exchange
HTN Clinical and radiographic resolution of symptoms at 3 months
13 Bag et al. [14] Case Report 2010 23 F SLE Normal Alteration in mental status. Being treated for SLE with IV methylprednisolone 40 mg every 8 h. T2/FLAIR and DWI hyperintensities involving bilateral thalamic and cerebral peduncle NA NA Methylprednisolone 500 mg daily and cyclophosphamide. SLE Clinical and radiographic resolution of symptoms at 8 months
14 Bălaşa et al. [15] Case Report 2015 42 M None 190/110 mmHg Occipital headache, nausea, vomiting
and disequilibrium. Elevated creatinine 9.88 mg/dL on arrival.
Multiple
white matter hypodensities in both cerebellar hemispheres
and the brainstem
T2/FLAIR hyperintensities involving the cerebellar white
matter as well as in the pons and midbrain
NA NA Hemodialysis and blood pressure management HTN (due to kidney disease) Clinical and radiographic resolution of symptoms at 2 weeks
15 Ball et al. [16] Case Report 2023 53 M Alcohol abuse NA 3 days of slurred speech, headache, and dizziness T2/FLAIR hyperintensities involving the bilateral cerebellum Normal NA Magnesium infusion Hypomagnesemia (<0.5 mg/dL) Clinical and radiographic resolution of symptoms (unspecified follow-up time)
16 Bandeo et al. [17] Case Report 2018 26 F Ulcerative colitis Adalimumab (40 mg every other week) NA Thunderclap headache with photophobia, nausea, and vomiting. NA Left frontal cSAH and hyperintense lesions on T2-weighted and FLAIR sequences located in both occipital lobes, left cerebellar hemisphere, and brainstem DSA: Normal NA Discontinuation of adalimumab Adalimumab Clinical and radiographic resolution of symptoms at 2 months
17 Bansal et al. [18] Retrospective Study 2020 16 F Viral hepatitis, and acute kidney injury NA Alteration in mental status, seizures, vomiting NA T2/FLAIR hyperintensities including basal ganglia, deep white mater and temporal lobe NA NA Blood pressure management HTN NA
18 Barnaure et al. [19] Case Report 2014 57 M HTN Elevated (unspecified) Gait ataxia NA T2/FLAIR hyperintensities involving e pons, medulla,
and cerebellum, and a small zone of contrast enhancement
in the pons
NA Normal Blood pressure management HTN Clinical and radiographic resolution of symptoms at 1 week
19 Bing et al. [20] Case Report 2019 53 M None 220/120 mmHg Acute onset aphasia, fever NA T2/FLAIR hyperintensities involving the pons, medulla, and cervical spinal cord NA NA Blood pressure management (nicardipine and urapidil) HTN Clinical and radiographic resolution of symptoms in one month
20 Braatz et al. [21] Case Report 2014 39 M NA 230/140 mmHg Headache, nausea, blurriness, and cortical blindness NA T2/FLAIR and DWI hyperintensities involving the pons and medulla NA NA Blood pressure management HTN NA
21 Chakroun-Walha et al. [22] Case Report 2016 14 M Renal insufficiency 200/150 mmHg Headaches, ataxia, hemianopsia, bilateral strabismus, GTC seizure Hypodensities in the brainstem T2/FLAIR hyperintensities involving the brainstem and partially cerebellum NA NA Blood pressure management and hemodialysis HTN (Renal etiology) Persistent strabismus and hemianopsia
22 Chaudhari et al. [23] Case Report 2018 28 F Caesarean section one week prior to presentation NA Seizure (abnormal movements of limbs and tongue-biting) T2/FLAIR hyperintensities involving bilateral basal ganglia, and left cerebellum NA Normal Seizure management (levetiracetam, and phenytoin) Postpartum? Clinical and radiographic improvement in 8 weeks
23 Chen et al. [109] Case Report 2014 55 M HTN 210/140 mmHg Headache and dizziness NA T2/FLAIR hyperintensities in the pons, midbrain bilateral thalami, and cerebellar hemispheres with multiple microbleeds at bilateral
basal ganglia
NA NA Blood pressure management HTN Clinical and radiographic improvement in 1 month
24 Chiang et al. [25] Case Report 2019 47 M ESRD, missed three dialysis sessions 194/114 mmHg Comatose Hypodentisities in the brainstem T2/FLAIR hyperintensities involving the pons and cerebellum NA Normal RRT and blood pressure management HTN (missed dialysis sessions) Clinical and radiographic improvement in 2 weeks
25 Chou et al. [26] Retrospective Study 2004 52 M HTN 194/120 Seizure, aphasia NA T2/FLAIR hyperintensities involving deep white matter, thalamus, and pons NA NA Blood pressure management, anticonvulsants, and RRT. HTN Clinical and radiographic improvement in 4 months
26 Decker et al. [27] Case Report 2009 74 M HTN 224/144 mmHg Slurred speech, right-sided facial droop,
and incontinence of urine
NA T2/FLAIR hyperintensities involving the brainstem (pons and midbrain) NA Normal (opening pressure of 16 cm of water, a protein of 129 mg/dL, WBC count
of 1/mm3
, and glucose of 65 mg/dL (serum glucose 137 mg/dL).
Blood pressure management HTN Clinical and radiographic improvement in 3 months
27 Deguchi et al. [28] Case Report 2012 42 F HTN, CKD, thrombocytopenia 270/150 mmHg Headache, nausea NA T2/FLAIR hyperintensities involving the brainstem and cerebellum NA NA Blood pressure management (amlodipine, nifedipine, arotinolol) HTN Clinical and radiographic improvement in 1 month
28 Dhawan et al. [29] Case Report 2010 10 F Pheochromocytoma
260/190 mmHg Facial palsy and bilateral
papilledema
NA T2/FLAIR hyperintensities in the bilateral caudate, putamen, thalamus, left-sided posterior limb of internal capsule, midbrain NA NA Blood pressure management HTN (pheochromocytoma) Clinical and radiographic improvement in 2 years
29 Di Stefano et al. [30] Case Report 2019 46 M Mononucleosis, GERD 200/140 mmHg One-month history of headache and blurry vision in the right eye NA T2/FLAIR hyperintensities involving brainstem (midbrain, pons, medulla) and cervical spinal cord (C5–C6) Normal NA Blood pressure management (ramipril, doxazosin) HTN Clinical and radiographic improvement in 3 weeks
30 Doi et al. [101] Case Report 2020 73 M Metastatic colorectal cancer NA Acute onset visual disturbance NA Increased T2-weighted signal within the pons, cerebellum, and bilateral optic nerves. Diffusion restriction within the pons and cerebellum NA NA NA NA NA
31 Doi et al. [31] Case Report 2006 35 M None 180/118 mmHg Headache, nausea, blurred vision NA Increased T2-weighted signal in the pons, cerebellum, and basal ganglia NA NA Blood pressure management HTN Clinical and radiographic improvement in 1 month
32 Doi et al. [31] Case Report 2006 52 F HTN 200/130 mmHg Altered mental status NA Increased T2-weighted signal in the midbrain, basal ganglia, and cerebellum NA NA Blood pressure management HTN Radiographic improvement in 2 weeks
33 Fujii et al. [32] Case Report 2023 57 M None 173/134 mmHg Rigidity NA Increased signal on T2WI within the bilateral cerebellum, optic tract, cerebellar vermis, and cervical spinal cord. With DWI and ADC correlate in most lesions NA NA RRT and blood pressure management HTN Radiographic improvement in five weeks
34 Gowan et al. [33] Case Report 2019 47 F HTN, T2DM, ESRD 180/99 mmHg 1-week history of altered mental status, difficulties walking, fatigue, and syncope Normal Increased signal on T2WI involving the pons and cerebellum NA NA RRT and blood pressure management HTN Radiographic improvement on day 9
35 Grossbach et al. [34] Case Report 2014 65 F Colon cancer 217/113 mmHg Comatose Increased signal on T2WI involving the bilateral cerebellum NA CSF: Normal Mechanical ventilation, sub-occipital craniectomy, EVD placement, HTN Modified Rankin score (mRS) 0 in six months
36 Hama et al. [35] Case Report 2019 49 F CKD 242/144 mmHg 2-week history of vomiting and malaise NA Increased signal on T2WI involving the pons and medulla NA NA RRT and blood pressure management HTN and kidney disease Clinical and radiographic improvement in 3 weeks
37 Han et al. [36] Case Report 2019 46 M HTN 147/103 mmHg Acute onset dysarthria and mild dysphagia NA Increased signal on T2WI brainstem, cerebellum and corticospinal
Tracts. Diffusion restriction involving pons. Microhemorrhages seen on SWI within pons
NA CSF: Elevated protein 55 mg/dL Conservative management Acute kidney injury Clinical and radiographic improvement within 4 weeks
38 Hayashi et al. [37] Case Report 2022 71 M NA 209/124 mmHg Decreased level of consciousness NA Increased signal on T2WI within the pons NA NA Blood pressure management HTN Clinical improvement and discharge on day 20
39 Hebant et al. [38] Case Report 2019 80 F HTN, HLD 190/110 mmHg Acute alteration in mental status NA Increased signal on T2WI involving the medulla and right cerebellar peduncle NA CSF: Elevated protein. Blood pressure management HTN Clinical and radiographic improvement within a few days
40 Ho et al. [12] Case Report 2016 49 M NA 202/138 mmHg Vertigo, cognitive decline, and difficulty ambulating Hypodensity involving pons Increased signal on T2WI involving the pons NA NA Blood pressure management HTN Radiographic resolution in 10 days, clinical improvement in
41 Honda et al. [13] Case Report 2019 46 F NA 208/140 mmHg Visual impairment NA Increased signal on T2WI involving the pons and bilateral cerebellar hemispheres NA NA Blood pressure management HTN Clinical and radiographic resolution
42 Jesrani et al. [39] Case Report 2021 39 F NA 118/74 mmHg GTC seizures NA Increased signal on T2WI involving the right caudate nucleus, bilateral thalami, and left globus pallidus NA NA Anti-seizure medications SLE Death on day 4
43 Jia et al. [40] Case Report 2017 14 F Neurogenic bladder 120/81 mmHg Decreased level of consciousness (comatose) NA Increased signal on T2WI involving the midbrain and pons NA NA Erythropoietin, ferrous sulfate, bicarbonate Renal failure (obstructive nephropathy) Discharged on day 14 at baseline and radiographic resolution at 2 months
44 Kachi et al. [41] Case Report 2023 71 F HTN, Sjogren’s disease 197/108 mmHg Unsteadiness and weakness of the left lower extremity NA Increased signal on T2WI involving the basal ganglia,
thalamus, brainstem, cerebellum
NA CSF: Elevated protein, oligoclonal bands anti-SSA/SSB, IL-6 IVMP 1000 mg for 3 days. Followed by oral prednisone 1 mg/kg. Sjogren disease Significant improvement on discharge
45 Katano et al. [42] Case Report 2010 54 M NA 201/113 mmHg Dysarthria and altered mental status NA Increased signal on T2WI involving the pons with ADC correlate NA NA Antihypertensive therapy with hemodialysis HTN Continued renal dysfunction, unspecified neurological outcome
46 Kitaguchi et al. [43] Case Series 2005 73 M CKD, Wernicke encephalopathy 220/116 mmHg Appetite loss and failure to thrive NA Increased signal on T2WI involving the pons, thalamus, and cerebellum NA NA Antihypertensive therapy HTN Mild lateral gaze palsy at 16-month follow-up
47 Kitaguchi et al. [43] Case Series 2005 49 F Aortic valve replacement 88/40 mmHg GTC seizure, flu-like symptoms CT scan showed a lacunar infarction in the left internal capsule of the brain Increased signal on T2WI involving the pons NA CSF: Normal Supportive treatment Undefined Clinical and radiographic improvement in 2 months. Residual lacunar infarction within pons
48 Lamotte et al. [44] Case Report 2021 51 M Nasopharyngeal carcinoma 185/125 mmHg Dysarthria and gait instability NA Increased signal on T2WI involving the bilateral cerebellum, pons, and temporal lobes NA NA Hemodialysis Acute renal failure Resolution of neurological symptoms in 3 days
49 Lee et al. [45] Case Report 2017 47 F NA 270/220 mmHg AMS NA Increased signal on T2WI involving the pons NA CSF: Opening pressure 21 cm H2O. Protein 102 mg/dL, albumin 64 mg/dL. Blood pressure management HTN Resolution of neurological symptoms in 3 days and radiographic resolution on 9th day
50 Liu et al. [46] Case Report 2018 37 F HTN 240/140 mmHg Headache and blurry vision NA Increased signal on T2WI with diffusion restriction involving the midbrain Normal NA Blood pressure management HTN Clinical and radiographic resolution in 2 weeks
51 Maciel et al. [47] Case Report 2015 44 F NA 150/110 mmHg Subacute onset headache and visual disturbance NA Increased signal on T2WI involving the midbrain, pons, medulla, and cerebellar hemispheres NA NA Blood pressure management HTN Clinical resolution in 2 weeks
52 Maier et al. [49] Case Report 2018 22 F SLE Normal GTC seizures Symmetrical hypodense lesions within the basal ganglia Increased signal on T2WI involving the bilateral basal ganglia NA NA Anti-seizure medications and osmolar therapy SLE associated Immunosuppressive therapy (cyclophosphamide and azathioprine) Death due to septic shock
53 Malhotra et al. [48] Case Report 2017 42 F SLE, HTN, pulmonary hypertension 217/75 mmHg Confusion, dysarthria, R hemiparesis, and hemianesthesia Normal Increased signal on T2WI involving the bilateral basal ganglia and thalamus DSA: Normal EEG: Normal Blood pressure management HTN Radiographic improvement at 5 weeks and discharge to a long-term care facility
54 Maruyama et al. [50] Case Report 2023 53 M HTN 214/145 mmHg Headache and left-sided weakness NA Increased signal on T2WI involving the pons and bilateral cerebellar hemispheres NA NA Blood pressure management HTN Radiographic improvement in 3 weeks and clinical resolution at 8 weeks
55 Matsumoto et al. [51] Case Report 2023 70s F HTN 199/111 mmHg Generalized weakness NA Increased signal on T2WI involving the pons, cerebellum, and medulla NA NA Blood pressure management HTN Radiographic resolution in 10 months
56 McCarron et al. [52] Case Report 2008 42 M NA 195/115 mmHg GTC seizure, right-sided hemiparesis NA Increased signal on T2WI involving the pons NA NA Blood pressure management HTN Almost complete radiographic resolution at 3-month follow-up
57 Moosa et al. [53] Case Report 2011 8 F Cloacal exstrophy, omphalocele, Chiari malformation with myelomeningocele and syringomyelia, and renal dysplasia with end stage renal disease. 180/120 mmHg Status epilepticus NA Increased signal on T2WI involving the midbrain and pons NA NA Blood pressure management and anti-seizure medications HTN Radiographic resolution in 9 days
58 Nagato et al. [54] Case Report 2009 14 F NA 185/145 mmHg Nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain NA Increased signal on T2WI involving the pons, medulla, cerebellum, and cervical spinal cord NA NA Blood pressure management HTN Significant clinical and radiographic improvement over 5 months
59 Nanba et al. [55] Case Report 2016 47 F NA 197/106 mmHg Headache NA Increased signal on T2WI involving the pons, bilateral thalamus, bilateral basal ganglia, and periventricular white matter NA NA Blood pressure management HTN Radiographic improvement in 2 weeks
60 Navarro-Ballester et al. [56] Case Report 2021 62 M HTN, HLD 190/95 mmHg Nausea and vomiting NA Increased signal on T2WI involving the midbrain with SAH DSA: mildly hypoplastic right vertebral artery NA Blood pressure management HTN Modified Rankin score of one at 6-month follow-up
61 Ocek et al. [57] Case Report 2015 55 F Psoriatic arthritis 120/80 mmHg Seizure, headache, hemiparesis NA Increased signal on T2WI involving the basal ganglia and thalamus NA CSF: Normal. EEG: Mild background slowing Removal of toxic agent sulfasalazine Radiographic resolution of symptoms in 1 month
62 Ogaki et al. [66] Case Report 2009 49 F NA 260/170 mmHg Subacute onset worsening blurry vision NA Increased signal on T2WI involving the pons, bilateral cerebellum, and thalami NA NA Blood pressure management HTN Discharge in one month with radiographic improvement
63 Ohashi et al. [58] Case Report 2022 4-month-old F NA SBP 100–130 mmHg Cardiac arrest following immunization NA Increased signal on T2WI involving the bilateral basal ganglia NA NA VA-ECMO, peritoneal dialysis HTN Discharge in 6 months
64 Onomura et al. [59] Case Report 2022 40s F Hypertension 230/150 mmHg Headache, fatigue, and nausea NA Increased signal on T2WI involving the supratentorial white matter, cerebellum, pons, and cerebellar peduncles. Numerous white matter microhemorrhages involving the cerebral white matter NA NA Blood pressure management HTN Discharge on day 20 with moderate improvement
65 Osman et al. [60] Case Report 2013 32 M T1DM, HTN 220/140 mmHg GTC seizure NA Increased signal on T2WI involving the bilateral pons and midbrain NA CSF: Normal Blood pressure management HTN Repeat neuroimaging 12 days later showed significant improvement
66 Ou et al. [61] Case Report 2018 40 M NA 200/140 mmHg Headache NA Increased signal on T2WI involving the pons NA NA Blood pressure management HTN Clinical resolution within three days
67 Raya et al. [62] Case Report 2019 29 M HIV, ESRD, HTN 245/141 mmHg Headache and burry vision NA Increased signal on T2WI involving the bilateral cerebellar hemisphere with more subtle involvement of the bilateral occipital lobes NA NA Blood pressure management HTN Discharged on day 7 of hospitalization with no symptoms
68 Resorlu et al. [63] Case Report 2017 39 M HTN 170/110 mmHg Headache NA Increased signal on T2WI involving the pons NA NA Blood pressure management HTN Radiographic resolution on hospital day 20
69 Ribeiro et al. [65] Case Report 2013 59 F HIV 210/110 mmHg Headache, nausea, vomiting, blurry vision NA Increased signal on T2WI involving the basal ganglia, thalamus, internal and external capsules, and pons. SWI: microhemorrhages within the pons NA NA Blood pressure management HTN Clinical improvement on hospital day 3
70 Sallah et al. [64] Case Report 2021 64 F ESRD, stroke 207/110 mmHg Lethargy NA Increased signal on T2WI involving the pons and bilateral middle cerebellar peduncles NA EEG: Findings within the ictal-interictal continuum. Blood pressure management and hemodialysis HTN + ESRD Clinical and radiographic resolution on day 11 of hospitalization
71 Sharma et al. [67] Case Report 2017 7 M None 190/100 mmHg GTC seizure NA Increased signal on T2WI involving the midbrain, pons, medulla, and cervical spinal cord NA NA Blood pressure management and anti-seizure medications HTN + Grade IV vesicoureteral reflex. Radiographic improvement within 3 weeks
72 Shimizu et al. [68] Case Report 2013 10 F T-ALL 141/105 mmHg Headache NA Increased signal on T2WI involving the bilateral cerebellum. Gd+ enhancement within the same area. DWI showing patchy diffusion restriction within the bilateral cerebellum NA NA Blood pressure management HTN+ chemotherapy (vincristine, danorubicin, dexamethasone, cytarabine, methotrexate, prednisolone) Radiographic improvement within 6 months
73 Srinivasan et al. [69] Case Report 2017 71 M HTN 200/140 mmHg Headache, dizziness, loss of consciousness NA Increased signal on T2WI involving the pons with restricted diffusion on DWI NA NA Blood pressure management HTN Clinical improvement. Repeat imaging not completed.
74 Tan et al. [70] Case Report 2019 52 M HTN, CKD 267/159 mmHg Headache, dizziness CTH: Hypoattenuation involving the pons NA NA NA Blood pressure management HTN Clinical improvement on day 2 of hospitalization
75 Tari Capone et al. [71] Case Report 2014 37 M HTN 270/160 mmHg Headache, and blurry vision NA Increased signal on T2WI involving the midbrain and pons NA NA Blood pressure management HTN Clinical improvement in 2 weeks and radiographic resolution within 3 months
76 Thambisetty et al. [72] Case Series 2003 38 M HTN, anemia, thrombocytopenia, chronic hyponatremia, ETOH abuse 210/130 mmHg Headache, right-sided weakness Obstructive
hydrocephalus,
non-enhancing hypoattenuation in
pons, midbrain
Obstructive
hydrocephalus,
increased T2
signal in the
pons and midbrain
NA NA Blood pressure management HTN Clinical resolution
77 Thambisetty et al. [72] Case Series 2003 61 M None 219/138 mm.Hg Left-sided weakness Old lacunar
infarction in
anterior limb
of right internal
capsule, 5-mm
hemorrhagic focus
in right putamen
Increased T2
signal in the
pons, cerebral
peduncles and
basal ganglia
bilaterally
NA NA Blood pressure management HTN Clinical resolution
78 Thambisetty et al. [72] Case Series 2003 46 M T2DM, HTN, anemia, stroke 203/139 mmHg Blurred vision, confusion Hypoattenuation in
the pons, cerebral
peduncles and
internal capsule
bilaterally
Increased T2
signal in midbrain,
pons, medulla and
cerebral peduncles.
Focus of hemorrhage
in left basal ganglia
NA NA Blood pressure management HTN Clinical resolution
79 Tortora et al. [73] Case Report 2015 32 F Abortion (1-month ago) 120/70 mmHg Headache and fever Hypoattenuation within the right basal ganglia Increased T2 signal and diffusion restriction in the pons NA NA Enoxaparin and magnesium sulfate Unknown Residual coordination deficits of the extremities, and radiographic findings of pontine ischemia
80 Tsutsumi et al. [74] Case Report 2012 54 F None 260/142 mmHg Dysarthria, right-sided hemiparesis Normal Increased T2 signal involving the pons. MR spectroscopy showed an elevated choline level NA NA Blood pressure management HTN due to pseudochromocytoma Radiographic resolution on hospital day 18
81 Tsutsumi et al. [74] Case Report 2012 44 F None 209/130 mmHg Headache, blurry vision, gait abnormalities NA Increased T2 signal involving the pons NA NA Blood pressure management HTN Radiographic resolution on hospital day 20
82 Vaysman et al. [75] Case Report 2019 22 F SLE 197/121 mmHg Headache, and joint pain Normal Increased T2 signal involving the midbrain NA NA Blood pressure management and plasmapheresis HTN + SLE Clinical and radiographic resolution of the patients’ symptoms on day 10
83 Wakely et al. [76] Case Report 2005 33 M None 210/150 mmHg Headache, and visual disturbance Normal Increased T2 signal and diffusion restriction involving the pons NA NA Blood pressure management HTN Radiographic resolution of symptoms within 2 months
84 Wittgrove et al. [77] Case Report 2018 57 M None 220 mmHg Aphasia, altered mental status, right-sided weakness Normal Increased T2 signal involving the pons and cerebellar peduncles NA Elevated protein 80 mg/dL Blood pressure management HTN secondary to renal artery stenosis Clinical and radiographic improvement of the patient’s symptoms
85 Yamagami et al. [78] Case Report 2019 41 F HTN 237/142 mmHg Headache Hemorrhage involving the left thalamus and basal ganglia Increased T2 signal involving the left cerebellum, pons, temporal lobes, and bilateral basal ganglia DSA: Normal NA Blood pressure management HTN Transferred to an inpatient rehabilitation facility on hospital day 40 with a modified Rankin score of 3. Repeat MRI showing resolution of vasogenic edema
86 Yis et al. [96] Case Report 2016 9 F None 225/110 mmHg Headache, vomiting, visual disturbance NA Increased T2 signal involving the medulla and cervical spinal cord NA CSF: 57 mg/dL, IgG Index 0.9. Blood pressure management and methylprednisolone HTN Clinical improvement in 7 days and radiographic resolution in 10 days
87 Yokoyama et al. [79] Case Report 2019 43 M Guillain Barre syndrome (GBS) 152/88 mmHg Decreased level of consciousness NA Increase T2 signal involving the pons, midbrain, cerebellar peduncle, and basal ganglia. Diffusion restriction NA NA IVIG and blood pressure management HTN secondary to GBS Significant improvement with residual limb weakness
88 Zhang et al. [80] Case Report 2016 35 M HTN 200/140 mmHg Dizziness Hypodensity involving the pons with focal hyperdensity consistent with acute hemorrhagic conversion Increased T2 signal involving the pons NA CSF: Elevated opening pressure of 245 mm H2O Blood pressure management HTN Clinical and radiographic improvement in one month
89 de Havenon et al. [81] Case Report 2014 50 M HTN, CKD 180/110 mmHg Headache, vomiting, confusion NA Increased T2 signal involving the parieto-occipital lobes, bilateral cerebellum, medulla and confluent central lesion involving the entire spinal cord NA NA Blood pressure management HTN Near complete radiographic resolution 5 months. Clinically has residual mild lower extremity weakness
90 de Havenon et al. [81] Case Report 2014 25 M HTN 225/160 mmHg Headache, vision loss NA Increased T2 signal involving the medulla and central lesions involving the entire spinal cord NA NA Blood pressure management HTN Complete clinical and radiographic resolution in 3 months
91 Milia et al. [82] Case Report 2008 44 F HTN 240/140 mmHg Headache, lower extremity weakness, blurry vision NA Increased T2 signal involving the pons, medulla, and a central cord lesion from the cervicomedullary junction to C5 NA CSF: Normal Blood pressure management HTN Clinical and radiographic resolution in 6 months
92 Samara et al. [83] Case Report 2019 42 M HTN 250/130 mmHg Headache and blurry vision Periventricular edema, enlarged ventricles, and effacement of the basilar cistern Increased T2 signal involving the medulla, cerebellum, and upper cervical spinal cord. NA CSF: Normal Blood pressure management HTN Clinical and radiographic resolution in 2 months
93 Liu et al. [84] Case Report 2019 20 M HTN 260/140 mmHg Blurry vision and weakness NA Increased T2 signal involving the medulla, cervical and thoracic spinal cord NA NA Blood pressure management HTN Clinical and radiographic resolution in 10 days
94 Chan et al. [87] Case Report 2018 4 M NF1 180/80 mmHg Tachycardia NA Increased T2 signal involving the pons, medulla, cerebellum, and complete spinal cord (most prominent in cervical cord) NA CSF: Normal Blood pressure management HTN from NF 1-related renal artery stenosis Clinical and radiographic improvement in 6 weeks with some residual vasogenic edema within the medulla
95 Gocmen et al. [85] Case Report 2016 10 M HTN, ESRD 170/120 mmHg Headaches NA Increased T2 signal involving the medulla and cervical spinal cord (C1-C5) NA Deferred Blood pressure management HTN from ESRD Clinical and radiographic resolution in 10 days
96 Marrone et al. [86] Case Report 2016 19 M Testicular carcinoma (bleomycin, cisplatin and etoposide) 240/140 mmHg Headache, nausea, and central scotoma of the left eye NA Increased T2 signal involving the bilateral basal ganglia, pons, medulla, and anterior portion of the entire cervical spinal cord NA NA Blood pressure management HTN from renal artery stenosis from paraaortic lymph node dissection Clinical and radiographic resolution in two weeks
97 Agarwal et al. [88] Case Report 2016 14 M Appendectomy 170/110 mmHg Seizure, headache, and blurry vision NA Increased T2 signal involving the pons, medulla, and entire spinal cord. Contrast sequence showing diffuse leptomeningeal enhancement NA CSF: Normal Blood pressure management HTN from renal artery stenosis Clinical and radiographic improvement in 28 days
98 Choh et al. [89] Case Report 2011 17 M None 240/130 mmHg Headache, visual disturbance, vomiting NA Increased T2 signal involving the medulla and cervical spinal cord NA NA Blood pressure management HTN from IgA nephropathy Clinical and radiographic improvement within one month
99 Khokhar et al. [90] Case Report 2016 22 M None 200/140 mmHg Headache, vomiting, blurry vision NA Increased T2 signal involving the parieto-occipital lobes with predmoninant involvement of the medulla, cerebellar hemisphere, and cervical spinal cord NA CSF: Normal. EEG: Normal Blood pressure management HTN Clinical and radiographic improvement in 25 days
100 Srichawla et al. [95] Case Report 2025 59 F HTN, COPD 195 mmHg SBP Seizures, altered mental status NA Increased T2 signal involving the bilateral cerebellar hemisphere CTA: Normal CSF: Normal. EEG: Bilateral intermittent rhythmic discharges. Generalized periodic discharges, lateralized rhythmic delta activity in the left frontal lobe. Blood pressure management HTN due to adrenal insufficiency Clinical and radiographic improvement on day 15

ADC: apparent diffusion coefficient. CKD: chronic kidney disease. COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. cSAH: convexity subarachnoid hemorrhage. DSA: digital subtraction angiography. DWI: diffusion weighted imaging. ESRD: end-stage renal disease. F: female. GBS: Guillain–Barre syndrome. GTC: generalized tonic clonic. HD: hemodialysis. HIV: human immunodeficiency virus. HTN: hypertension. IVIG: intravenous immunoglobulin. M: male. SBP: systolic blood pressure. MRA: magnetic resonance angiography. RRT: renal-replacement therapy. SAH: subarachnoid hemorrhage. SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus. SWI: susceptibility weighted imaging. T-ALL: T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Table 3.

Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal and risk of bias results for case reports/series.

Reference Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Overall Risk
Abe et al. (2014) [4] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Abraham et al. (2020) [5] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Abusabha et al. (2017) [6] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Akhondian et al. (2002) [8] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Andour et al. (2023) [9] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Arai et al. (1997) [10] Y Y Y Y Y N N N 5 Moderate
Aridon et al. (2011) [11] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Bag et al. (2010) [14] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Bălaşa et al. (2015) [15] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Ball et al. (2023) [16] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Bandeo et al. (2018) [17] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Barnaure et al. (2014) [19] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Bing et al. (2009) [20] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Braatz et al. (2014) [21] Y Y Y Y Y Y N N 6 Moderate
Chakroun-Walha et al. (2018) [22] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Chaudhari et al. (2014) [23] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Chiang et al. (2019) [25] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Chou et al. (2004) [26] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Decker et al. (2009) [27] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Deguchi et al. (2012) [28] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Dhawan et al. (2010) [29] Y Y Y Y Y N N N 5 Low
Di Stefano et al. (2019) [30] Y Y Y Y Y N N N 5 Moderate
Doi et al. [101] Y Y Y Y N N N N 4 High
Doi et al. [31] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Fujii et al. [32] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Gowan et al. [33] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Grossbach et al. [34] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Hama et al. [35] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Han et al. [36] Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y 7 Low
Hayashi et al. [37] Y Y Y N Y N N Y 5 Mod
Hebant et al. [38] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Ho et al. [12] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Honda et al. [13] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Jesrani et al. [39] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Jia et al. [40] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Kachi et al. [41] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Kitaguchi et al. [43] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Lamotte et al. [44] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Lee et al. [45] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Liu et al. [46] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Maciel et al. [47] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Maier et al. [50] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Malhotra et al. [48] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Maruyama et al. [50] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Matsumoto et al. [51] Y Y Y Y Y Y N N 6 Moderate
McCarron et al. [52] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Moosa et al. [53] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Nagato et al. [54] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Nanba et al. [55] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Navarro-Ballester et al. [56] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Ocek et al. [57] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Ogaki et al. [66] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Ohashi et al. [58] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Onomura et al. [59] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Osman et al. [60] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Ou et al. [61] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Raya et al. [62] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Resorlu et al. [63] Y Y Y Y N N N N 4 High
Ribeiro et al. [65] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Sallah et al. [64] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Sharma et al. [67] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Shimizu et al. [68] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Srinivasan et al. [69] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Tan et al. [70] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Tari Capone et al. [71] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Thambisetty et al. [72] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Tortora et al. [73] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Vaysman et al. [75] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Wakely et al. [76] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Wittgrove et al. [77] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Yamagami et al. [78] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Yokoyama et al. [79] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Zhang et al. [80] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Havenon et al. [81] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Milia et al. [82] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Samara et al. [83] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Liu et al. [84] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Chan et al. [87] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Gocmen et al. [85] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Marrone et al. [86] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Agarwal et al. [88] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Choh et al. [89] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Khokhar et al. [90] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low
Srichawla et al. [95] Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8 Low

Q1. Were the patient’s demographic characteristics clearly described? Q2. Was the patient’s history clearly described and presented as a timeline? Q3. Was the current clinical condition of the patient on presentation clearly described? Q4. Were diagnostic tests or assessment methods and the results clearly described? Q5. Was the intervention(s) or treatment procedure(s) clearly described? Q6. Was the post-intervention clinical condition clearly described? Q7. Were adverse events (harms) or unanticipated events identified and described? Q8. Does the case report provide takeaway lessons? Overall: Sum of points. Y—Yes; N—No; U—Unclear; NA—Not applicable.

Table 4.

Assessment of retrospective cohort studies using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale.

Study Selection (4 Score) Comparability (2 Score) Outcome (3 Score) Total
Ahn et al. (2004) [7] *** ** *** 8
Bansal et al. (2020) [18] *** * 4
Brewer et al. [97] *** ** *** 8
Chen et al. (2017) [91] **** ** *** 9
Chou et al. (2004) [26] *** ** *** 8
Fitzgerald et al. (2015) [92] *** ** *** 8
Li et al. [98] *** ** *** 8
McKinney et al. (2013) [2] *** ** *** 8
McKinney et al. (2007) [93] *** ** *** 8
Raman et al. (2017) [99] *** ** *** 8
Yoon et al. (2013) [100] *** ** *** 8
Aygunes et al. (2024) [94] *** ** *** 8

Limitations and Future Direction

This review has several limitations. First, the included studies predominantly consisted of case reports and small retrospective cohort studies, limiting the generalizability of our findings. The heterogeneity observed (I2 = 71%, τ2 = 0.2046) suggests variability in study designs, diagnostic criteria, and patient populations. Our meta-analysis attempts to address this through random-effects modeling. Additionally, publication bias may have influenced our results, as suggested by the asymmetry in the funnel plot and influential studies identified in the Baujat plot. The reliance on English-language studies may also introduce selection bias. Although we show that cvPRES has a higher mean MAP compared to isolated PRES seen in other studies, head-to-head studies needs to be completed to validate this. Further research is needed to better elucidate the pathophysiology and optimal management of central-variant PRES. Prospective studies with larger sample sizes and standardized diagnostic criteria are essential to validate our findings and explore the impact of specific interventions on patient outcomes. Symptoms and clinical characteristics of cvPRES appear to be similar to those of normal PRES; however, this should be studied using a comparator group. Moreover, longitudinal studies examining the long-term cognitive and functional sequelae of central-variant PRES could provide valuable insights into its prognosis. Finally, the integration of advanced hemodynamic monitoring, particularly those techniques that can measure the rate of MAP changes to estimate cerebral perfusion pressure and autoregulatory changes within the cerebral vasculature, will be necessary to identify the exact pathophysiological underpinnings of cvPRES compared to its typical clinico-radiographic presentation.

5. Conclusions

Central-variant PRES (cvPRES) manifests predominantly in younger adults with severe hypertension, most often involving the pons and other central structures (i.e., subcortical nuclei, brainstem, cerebellum, and spinal cord), and has a pooled incidence rate of 13% amongst cohort studies of PRES. Despite higher blood pressures and critical brainstem edema, outcomes are generally favorable (2% mortality), reflecting reversible vasogenic injury rather than permanent neuronal damage. Cases of cvPRES have a higher MAP compared to that what is reported in the literature of typical PRES. However, this needs to be supported with original studies. Early recognition of its distinctive imaging pattern and prompt blood-pressure management are key to optimizing recovery. Future prospective studies should standardize diagnostic criteria, elucidate underlying autoregulatory mechanisms, and evaluate targeted interventions to further improve patient outcomes.

Author Contributions

B.S.S. completed the literature review, drafted the initial manuscript, generated illustrations/figures, provided intellectual verification of the topic, and edited the final manuscript. M.A.G.-D. drafted the initial manuscript. B.S.S. and B.S. provided intellectual verification on this topic. All authors reviewed the final draft of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article. Further enquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there are no conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

This research received no external funding.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Hinchey J., Chaves C., Appignani B., Breen J., Pao L., Wang A., Pessin M.S., Lamy C., Mas J.L., Caplan L.R. A reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 1996;334:494–500. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199602223340803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.McKinney A.M., Jagadeesan B.D., Truwit C.L. Central-variant posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: Brainstem or basal ganglia involvement lacking cortical or subcortical cerebral edema. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2013;201:631–638. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Page M.J., McKenzie J.E., Bossuyt P.M., Boutron I., Hoffmann T.C., Mulrow C.D., Shamseer L., Tetzlaff J.M., Akl E.A., Brennan S.E., et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Abe T., Tokuda Y. Recurrent posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome of the brainstem in a hypertensive patient with end-stage renal disease. J. Emergencies Trauma Shock. 2014;7:242–243. doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.136876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Abraham P., Longardner K., Chen P., Huisa B., Handwerker J. Case 279: Central-Variant Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome. Radiology. 2020;296:239–243. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020181547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Abusabha Y., Petridis A.K., Kraus B., Kamp M.A., Steiger H.J., Beseoglu K. Life-threatening posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in the cerebellum treated by posterior fossa decompression. Acta Neurochir. (Wien.) 2017;159:1325–1328. doi: 10.1007/s00701-017-3228-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ahn K.J., You W.J., Jeong S.L., Lee J.W., Kim B.S., Lee J.H., Yang D.W., Son Y.M., Hahn S.T. Atypical manifestations of reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome: Findings on diffusion imaging and ADC mapping. Neuroradiology. 2004;46:978–983. doi: 10.1007/s00234-004-1276-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Akhondian J., Ashrafzadeh F., Seilanian Toosi F., Behnam M., Beiraghi Toosi M., Imannezhad S., Akhoundian M.R., Hashemi N. A case report of Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome with spinal cord involvement (PRES-SCI) as an atypical presentation of PRES in children. Iran. J. Child Neurol. 2022;16:149–154. doi: 10.22037/ijcn.v16i1.32170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Andour H., Cheraqui A., Lahfidi A., Fikri M., Ech-Cherif El Kettani N., Jiddane M., Touarsa F. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES): Should more attention be paid to the atypical forms? Radiol. Case Rep. 2023;18:545–549. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2022.10.079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Arai M., Shigeno K., Wada M. A reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome in a patient with classical polyarteritis nodosa. Clin. Neurol. 1997;37:64–66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Aridon P., Ragonese P., Mazzola M.A., Quintini G., Lo Re M., Talamanca S., Terruso V., D'Amelio M., Savettieri G. Reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome in a patient with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Neurol. Sci. 2011;32:469–472. doi: 10.1007/s10072-010-0465-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ho T.H., Tsai C.L., Hsu Y.D., Lee J.T., Yang F.C., Hsu C.C., Lin C.C. Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome Mimicking Brainstem Infarction: A Dilemma. Acta Neurol. Taiwan. 2016;25:56–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Honda K., Hashimoto S. Brainstem Cerebellum-type Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome. Intern. Med. 2020;59:1337–1338. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.3603-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bag A.K., Curé J.K., Sullivan J.C., Roberson G.H. Central variant of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in systemic lupus erythematosus: New associations? Lupus. 2010;19:225–226. doi: 10.1177/0961203309345749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bălaşa R., Maier S., Baubec E.G., Bajkó Z., Bălaşa A. Cerebellar and brainstem variant of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. Acta Neurol. Belg. 2015;115:401–403. doi: 10.1007/s13760-014-0370-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ball A.M., Rayi A., Gustafson M. A Rare Association of Hypomagnesemia and Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES) Cureus. 2023;15:e41572. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bandeo L., Rausch A., Saucedo M., Chertcoff A., Cejas L.L., Roca C.U., Pacha S., Pardal M.F., Reisin R., Bonardo P. Convexity Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Secondary to Adalidumab in a Patient with Ulcerative Colitis. J. Vasc. Interv. Neurol. 2018;10:62–64. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bansal S., Bansal R., Goyal M.K., Takkar A., Singh R., Singh P., Lal V. Clinical, Etiological and Imaging Profile of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome: A Prospective and Follow-Up Study. Ann. Indian. Acad. Neurol. 2020;23:182–188. doi: 10.4103/aian.AIAN_379_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Barnaure I., Horvath J., Lovblad K.O., Vargas M.I. Atypical brainstem presentation of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) J. Neuroradiol. 2014;41:143–144. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2013.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bing F., M'Biene S., Gay S. Brainstem Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome With Spinal Cord Involvement (PRES-SCI) Rev. Neurol. (Paris) 2020;176:874–877. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2020.01.354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Braatz V.L., Lorenzoni P.J., Kay C.S., Chula D.C., Scola R.H., Werneck L.C. Brainstem reversible leukoencephalopathy syndrome. Arq. Neuropsiquiatr. 2014;72:83–84. doi: 10.1590/0004-282X20130206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chakroun-Walha O., Bacha I., Frikha M., Ben Mahfoudh K., Rekik N. A rare case of acute posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome involving brainstem in a child. J. Acute Dis. 2016;5:521–523. doi: 10.1016/j.joad.2016.08.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chaudhari D.M., Renjen P.N., Goyal N., Mishra A. Central variant reversible encephalopathy syndrome. BMJ Case Rep. 2022;15:245636. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2021-245636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chen D.Y., Tseng Y.C., Hsu H.L., Huang Y.L., Chen C.J. Teaching neuroimages: Central variant of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. Neurology. 2014;82:e164. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chiang W.F., Chen P.T., Chen Y.L., Chen M.H. Atypical posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in a noncompliant hemodialysis patient: Case report and literature review. Hemodial. Int. 2019;23:e100–e103. doi: 10.1111/hdi.12735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chou M.-C., Lai P.-H., Yeh L.-R., Yuan M.-K., Liang H.-L., Chen C., Pan H.-B., Yang C.-F., Li J.-Y., Lo Y.-K. Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome: Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in 12 Cases. Kaohsiung J. Med. Sci. 2004;20:381–388. doi: 10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70174-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Decker D.A., Falchook A.D., Yachnis A.T., Waters M.F. Radiographic and pathologic findings in an atypical brainstem variant of reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome. Neurologist. 2009;15:364–366. doi: 10.1097/NRL.0b013e3181951ac7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Deguchi I.M.D., Uchino A.M.D., Suzuki H.M.D., Tanahashi N.M.D. Malignant Hypertension with Reversible Brainstem Hypertensive Encephalopathy and Thrombotic Microangiopathy. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2012;21:915.e7–915.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2012.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dhawan S.R., Goswami J.N., Suthar R., Dayal D., Vyas S., Singhi P.D. A Child with Central Variant Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome. Neuropediatrics. 2019;50:66–67. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Di Stefano V., Rispoli M.G., Onofrj M., De Angelis M.V. Tumour-like presentation of atypical posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome with prominent brainstem involvement. BMJ Case Rep. 2020;13:231687. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2019-231687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Doi Y., Kimura F., Fujiyama T., Fujimura C., Nishina T., Sato T., Hosokawa T., Uehara H., Ishida S., Hanafusa T. Hypertensive brainstem encephalopathy without parieto-occipital lesion—Two case reports. Neurol. Med.-Chir. 2006;46:75–79. doi: 10.2176/nmc.46.75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Fujii N., Fujii H., Matsuki M., Doi S., Isozaki T., Watanabe Y., Nakamata A., Fujita A., Mori H. Optic pathway involvement in the posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: A case report and review of the literature. Radiol. Case Rep. 2023;18:3769–3772. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2023.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gowan J.M., Liu A. Isolated pan-pontine posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in a patient with uncontrolled hypertension. Clin. Case Rep. 2019;7:32–36. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.1888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Grossbach A.J., Abel T.J., Hodis B., Wassef S.N., Greenlee J.D.W. Hypertensive posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome causing posterior fossa edema and hydrocephalus. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2014;21:207–211. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2013.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hama R., Oshikawa H. Brainstem Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome. Intern. Med. 2019;58:2901–2902. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.2784-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Han N., Sun Z., Zhou C., Shen Y., Li G., Wang J. Central-variant posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome with bilateral corticospinal tract involvement: A case report. Acta Neurol. Belg. 2021;121:265–268. doi: 10.1007/s13760-020-01394-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hayashi Y., Hashida T., Yazaki M., Uchida T., Watanabe E. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) of the isolated brainstem. Clin. Case Rep. 2022;10:e05712. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.5712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hebant B., Guegan-Massardier E., Triquenot-Bagan A., Ozkul-Wermester O. Atypical MRI presentation of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome with predominant brainstem involvement. Acta Neurol. Belg. 2019;119:123–125. doi: 10.1007/s13760-018-1055-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Jesrani G., Gupta S., Arya Y., Syal A., Gupta M. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Induced Central Variant of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome: A Rare Association. Cureus. 2021;13:e13431. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Jia L.J., Qu Z.Z., Zhang X.Q., Tian Y.J., Wang Y. Uremic encephalopathy with isolated brainstem involvement revealed by magnetic resonance image: A case report. BMC Neurol. 2017;17:154. doi: 10.1186/s12883-017-0936-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kachi S., Nomura T., Yamada K., Oshima Y., Ura S. Atypical posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome associated with Sjögren's syndrome: A case report. Rinsho Shinkeigaku. 2023;63:159–162. doi: 10.5692/clinicalneurol.cn-001809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Katano K., Kakuchi Y., Nakashima A., Nakahama K., Kawano M. Apparent diffusion coefficient map based on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging is useful in diagnosing the brainstem variant of reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome with uremia. Clin. Exp. Nephrol. 2010;14:479–482. doi: 10.1007/s10157-010-0293-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kitaguchi H., Tomimoto H., Miki Y., Yamamoto A., Terada K., Satoi H., Kanda M., Fukuyama H. A brainstem variant of reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome. Neuroradiology. 2005;47:652–656. doi: 10.1007/s00234-005-1399-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lamotte G., Lenka A. Brainstem Predominant Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome. Neurol. India. 2021;69:536–537. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.314564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lee S.W., Lee S.J. Central-Variant Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome with Albuminocytologic Dissociation. Case Rep. Neurol. 2018;10:29–33. doi: 10.1159/000486444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Liu C., Cao J., Su Z., Xu S. Isolated brainstem involvement in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: A case report and review of the literature. Int. J. Neurosci. 2019;129:808–813. doi: 10.1080/00207454.2018.1561452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Maciel R., Nzwalo H., Palma R., Martins A., Shamassa M., Pizhin D. The Resolution of Central Variant of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome. Neurohospitalist. 2015;5:91–92. doi: 10.1177/1941874414557082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Malhotra K., Mazumder R., Blanco M.B., Liebeskind D.S. Atypical case of central-variant posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. Acta Neurol. Belg. 2017;117:413–415. doi: 10.1007/s13760-016-0686-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Maier S., Monica C., Romaniuc A., Andone S., Bălaşa R. Central-variant posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in a young patient with systemic lupus erythematosus. Acta Neurol. Belg. 2019;119:269–271. doi: 10.1007/s13760-018-1046-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Maruyama H., Fujikawa H., Takimiya R., Sato H. Simultaneous Presentation of Brainstem and Cerebellar Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome With Acute Cerebral Infarction. Cureus. 2023;15:e34843. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Matsumoto N., Ogawa T., Hishikawa N., Takao Y., Fujii S. Dramatic Amelioration in Serial Magnetic Resonance Imaging in an "Isolated Brainstem" Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome Case. Yonago Acta Med. 2023;66:297–299. doi: 10.33160/yam.2023.05.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.McCarron M.O., McKinstry C.S. Vanishing brainstem edema. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2008;17:156–157. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2007.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Moosa A.N., Eagam M., Moodley M. Reversible brainstem edema due to hypertensive encephalopathy in an 8-year-old girl. J. Child. Neurol. 2011;26:1033–1035. doi: 10.1177/0883073811399802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Nagato M., Takahashi Y., Yoshioka M., Nambu M. A case of hypertensive encephalopathy with extensive spinal lesions on MRI. Brain Dev. 2010;32:598–601. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2009.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Nanba T., Kashimura H., Saura H., Takeda M. Subarachnoid hemorrhage due to ruptured intracranial aneurysm following posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. J. Neurosci. Rural. Pract. 2016;7:440–442. doi: 10.4103/0976-3147.182767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Navarro-Ballester A., Revert-Espí R. Unusual Presentation of a Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome With Brainstem Involvement and Subarachnoid Haemorrhage. Cureus. 2021;13:e16295. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ocek L., Sener U., Demirtas B.S., Ozcelik M.M., Oztekin O., Zorlu Y. Central-Variant Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy due to Sulfasalazine: A Case Report. Med. Princ. Pract. 2015;24:578–580. doi: 10.1159/000437386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ohashi E., Hayakawa I., Tsutsumi Y., Kamei K., Ide K., Abe Y. Central-variant posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in an infant with mid-aortic syndrome: A rare case of symmetric basal ganglia lesions. Radiol. Case Rep. 2022;17:3475–3480. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2022.07.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Onomura H., Shimizu T., Suzuki J., Nakai N., Teramachi Y., Tomonori K., Akiguchi I., Ito Y. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome presenting with thrombotic microangiopathy triggered by malignant hypertension: A case report and literature review. BMJ Neurol. Open. 2022;4:e000296. doi: 10.1136/bmjno-2022-000296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Osman Y., Imam Y.Z., Salem K., Al-Hail H., Uthman B., Deleu D. Isolated Brainstem Involvement in a Patient with Hypertensive Encephalopathy. Case Rep. Neurol. Med. 2013;2013:540947. doi: 10.1155/2013/540947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Ou S., Xia L., Wang L., Xia L., Zhou Q., Pan S. Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome With Isolated Involving Infratentorial Structures. Front. Neurol. 2018;9:843. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Raya M., Nasir I., Liu A. Atypical presentation of cerebellar posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in a patient with HIV. Clin. Case Rep. 2020;8:262–264. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.2625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Resorlu M., Karatag O., Aylanc N., Ozturk M.O., Toprak C.A. Posterior reversible encephalopathy with brainstem involvement. Intern. Emerg. Med. 2018;13:455–457. doi: 10.1007/s11739-017-1759-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Sallah Y.H., Zubair A.S., Dewey J.J. Extensive Brainstem Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome in a Hemodialysis Non-Adherent Patient. Cureus. 2021;13:e14523. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Ribeiro S., Monteiro M., Moreira B., França M. Rare posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in a patient with HIV. BMJ Case Rep. 2013;2013:201495. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2013-201495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Ogaki K., Fukae J., Noda K., Fujishima K., Hattori N., Okuma Y. Blurred Vision With Acute Hypertension Indicating Hypertensive Brainstem Encephalopathy: Case Report. Neurol. Med. -Chir. 2009;49:625–630. doi: 10.2176/nmc.49.625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Sharma S., Gupta R., Sehgal R., Aggarwal K.C. Atypical presentation of posterior reversible encephalopathy: In a child with bilateral grade IV vesicoureteric reflux. J. Trop. Pediatr. 2014;60:331–333. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmu019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Shimizu Y., Tha K.K., Iguchi A., Cho Y., Yoshida A., Fujima N., Tsukahara A., Shirato H., Terae S. Isolated posterior fossa involvement in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. Neuroradiol. J. 2013;26:514–519. doi: 10.1177/197140091302600504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Srinivasan K.G., Balasubramanian P., Mayilvaganan K.R., Kannan U.N., Bilal M. Central variant of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome—A rare case report. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2017;11:TD01–TD02. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/23269.9682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Tan Y.Y., Tan K. Hypertensive brainstem encephalopathy: A diagnosis often overlooked. Clin. Med. (Lond.) 2019;19:511–513. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2019-0247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Tari Capone F., Candela S., Bozzao A., Orzi F. A new case of brainstem variant of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: Clinical and radiological features. Neurol. Sci. 2015;36:1263–1265. doi: 10.1007/s10072-014-1999-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Thambisetty M., Biousse V., Newman N.J. Hypertensive brainstem encephalopathy: Clinical and radiographic features. J. Neurol. Sci. 2003;208:93–99. doi: 10.1016/S0022-510X(02)00379-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Tortora F., Caranci F., Belfiore M.P., Manzi F., Pagliano P., Cirillo S. Brainstem variant of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: A case report. Neuroradiol. J. 2015;28:634–637. doi: 10.1177/1971400915609336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Tsutsumi M., Akimoto J., Nakajima N., Hashimoto R., Haraoka J. Two cases of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome resembling brainstem glioma. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2012;114:1062–1065. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.02.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Vaysman T., Xu P., Vartanian T., Michalak P., Pike K., Liu A. "Highlighting" red nuclei by atypical posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin. Case Rep. 2019;7:1404–1408. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.2245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Wakely S.L., Ditchfield A. Hypertensive encephalopathy: A rare case of isolated pons involvement. Clin. Radiol. Extra. 2005;60:E53–E56. doi: 10.1016/j.cradex.2005.01.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Wittgrove C., Kaur H., Siddiqui J.H. Atypical Variant of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome in the Setting of Renovascular Hypertension: Case Report and Review of Literature. Cureus. 2018;10:e3573. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Yamagami K., Maeda Y., Iihara K. Variant Type of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome Associated with Deep Brain Hemorrhage: Case Report and Review of the Literature. World Neurosurg. 2020;134:176–181. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.10.196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Yokoyama J., Yamaguchi H., Koge J., Matsushita T., Isobe N., Yamasaki R., Kira J.I. Brainstem posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in a case with Guillain–Barré syndrome. Clin. Exp. Neuroimmunol. 2019;10:267–271. doi: 10.1111/cen3.12530. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Zhang Y.X., Zheng Y., Zhang B.J., Zhang Y., Ding M.P., Zhang B.R. Variant Type of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome with Diffuse Cerebral White Matter and Brainstem Involvement Associated with Intracranial Hemorrhage. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2016;25:e233–e235. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.09.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.de Havenon A., Joos Z., Longenecker L., Shah L., Ansari S., Digre K. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome with spinal cord involvement. Neurology. 2014;83:2002–2006. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Milia A., Moller J., Pilia G., Mascia M.G., Marchi P., Mura M., Marrosu M.G. Spinal cord involvement during hypertensive encephalopathy: Clinical and radiological findings. J. Neurol. 2008;255:142–143. doi: 10.1007/s00415-008-0698-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Samara A., Berry B., Ghannam M. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome with isolated infratentorial involvement: A case report. Radiol. Case Rep. 2019;14:576–580. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2019.02.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Liu L., Dai D., Cao F., Zhang L., Wang X. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome with spinal cord involvement but without hemisphere lesions: A case report. Medicine. 2019;98:e13649. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Gocmen R., Ardicli D., Erarslan Y., Duzova A., Anlar B. Reversible Hypertensive Myelopathy-The Spinal Cord Variant of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome. Neuropediatrics. 2017;48:115–118. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1597612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Marrone L.C., Martins W.A., Brunelli J.P., Fussiger H., Carvalhal G.F., Filho J.R., Soder R.B., Schuck M., Viola F.S., Marrone A.C., et al. PRES with asymptomatic spinal cord involvement. Is this scenario more common than we know? Spinal Cord. Ser. Cases. 2016;2:15001. doi: 10.1038/scsandc.2015.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Chan P.K.J., Tse K.S., Fok W.S.E., Poon W.L. First case of neurofibromatosis with posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome showing spinal cord involvement. Indian. J. Radiol. Imaging. 2018;28:161–164. doi: 10.4103/ijri.IJRI_320_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Agarwal H., Sebastian L.J.D., Gaikwad S.B., Garg A., Mishra N.K. Spinal cord involvement and contrast enhancement in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. BJR Case Rep. 2016;2:20150326. doi: 10.1259/bjrcr.20150326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Choh N.A., Jehangir M., Rasheed M., Mira T., Ahmad I., Choh S. Involvement of the cervical cord and medulla in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. Ann. Saudi Med. 2011;31:90–92. doi: 10.4103/0256-4947.75790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Khokhar H.V., Choudhary P., Saxena S., Arif M. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome with spinal cord involvement (PRES-SCI): A case report. Ann. Indian. Acad. Neurol. 2016;19:134–136. doi: 10.4103/0972-2327.165456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Chen T.-Y., Wu T.-C., Ko C.-C., Feng I.J., Tsui Y.-K., Lin C.-J., Chen J.-H., Lin C.-P. Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Evaluation of the Supratentorial Brain Regions in Patients Diagnosed with Brainstem Variant of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome: A Preliminary Study. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2017;26:1560–1568. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.02.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Fitzgerald R.T., Samant R.S., Kumar M., Van Hemert R., Angtuaco E.J. Features of infratentorial-predominant posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. Acta Neurol. Belg. 2015;115:629–634. doi: 10.1007/s13760-015-0431-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.McKinney A.M., Short J., Truwit C.L., McKinney Z.J., Kozak O.S., SantaCruz K.S., Teksam M. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: Incidence of atypical regions of involvement and imaging findings. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2007;189:904–912. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Aygunes U., Sasmaz H.I., Arpaci T., Akbas T., Ozcan N., Antmen A.B. Clinical and Radiological Characteristics of Classical and Variant Type of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome on Prognosis Following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Pediatric Patients: A Single-Center Experience. Exp. Clin. Transplant. 2024;22:800–809. doi: 10.6002/ect.2024.0126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Srichawla B.S., Kipkorir V., Lalla R. Central-variant posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in association with adrenal insufficiency: A case report. Med. (Baltim.) 2025;104:e41625. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Yiş U., Karaoğlu P., Kurul S.H., Soylu A., Çakmakçi H., Kavukçu S. Posterior reversible leukoencephalopathy syndrome with spinal cord involvement in a 9-year-old girl. Brain Dev. 2016;38:154–157. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2015.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Brewer J., Owens M.Y., Wallace K., Reeves A.A., Morris R., Khan M., Lamarca B., Martin Jr J.N. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in 46 of 47 patients with eclampsia. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2013;208:468.e1–468.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Li Y.M.D.P., Gor D.M.D., Walicki D.M.T., Jenny D.R.N., Jones D.M.D., Barbour P.M.D., Castaldo J.M.D. Spectrum and Potential Pathogenesis of Reversible Posterior Leukoencephalopathy Syndrome. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2012;21:873–882. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Raman R., Devaramane R., Jagadish G.M., Chowdaiah S. Various Imaging Manifestations of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES) on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Pol. J. Radiol. 2017;82:64–70. doi: 10.12659/PJR.899960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Yoon S.D., Cho B.M., Oh S.M., Park S.H., Jang I.B., Lee J.Y. Clinical and radiological spectrum of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. J. Cerebrovasc. Endovasc. Neurosurg. 2013;15:206–213. doi: 10.7461/jcen.2013.15.3.206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Doi H., Yokote H., Uchihara T., Toru S. Bilateral Optic Nerve Edema in Central-variant Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome. Intern. Med. 2020;59:2333–2334. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.4919-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Fugate J.E., Claassen D.O., Cloft H.J., Kallmes D.F., Kozak O.S., Rabinstein A.A. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: Associated clinical and radiologic findings. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2010;85:427–432. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2009.0590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Rabinstein A.A., Mandrekar J., Merrell R., Kozak O.S., Durosaro O., Fugate J.E. Blood pressure fluctuations in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2012;21:254–258. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Srichawla B.S., Garcia-Dominguez M.A. Regional dynamic cerebral autoregulation across anterior and posterior circulatory territories: A detailed exploration and its clinical implications. World J. Crit. Care Med. 2024;13:97149. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v13.i4.97149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Srichawla B.S., Catton R.M., Lichtenberg A.A., Henninger N. Clinical characteristics and risk factors for bilateral lateral geniculate body pathology: A systematic review of the literature. Neurol. Sci. 2023;44:3481–3493. doi: 10.1007/s10072-023-06818-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Schwartz R.B. Hyperperfusion encephalopathies: Hypertensive encephalopathy and related conditions. Neurologist. 2002;8:22–34. doi: 10.1097/00127893-200201000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Beausang-Linder M., Bill A. Cerebral circulation in acute arterial hypertension--protective effects of sympathetic nervous activity. Acta Physiol. Scand. 1981;111:193–199. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1981.tb06724.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Singh T.D., Fugate J.E., Rabinstein A.A. Central pontine and extrapontine myelinolysis: A systematic review. Eur. J. Neurol. 2014;21:1443–1450. doi: 10.1111/ene.12571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Chen P.-R., Chen S.-P. Posterior reversible encephalopathy as the first manifestation of Bickerstaff's brainstem encephalitis. BMC Neurol. 2016;16:215. doi: 10.1186/s12883-016-0737-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article. Further enquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.


Articles from Neurology International are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES