Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent studies from the United States have shown that institutions with higher numbers of pancreatic resection procedures for neoplasm have lower mortality rates associated with this procedure. However, minimal work has been done to assess whether the results of similar volume-outcome studies within a publicly financed health care system would differ from those obtained in a mixed public-private health care system. METHODS: A population-based retrospective analysis was used to examine pancreatic resection for neoplasm in Ontario for the period 1988/89 to 1994/95. Outcomes examined included in-hospital case fatality rate and mean length of stay in hospital. For each hospital, total procedure volume for the study period was defined as low (fewer than 22), medium (22-42) or high (more than 42). Regression models were used to measure volume-outcome relations. RESULTS: The likelihood of postoperative death was higher in low-volume and medium-volume centres than in high-volume centres (odds ratio 5.1 and 4.5 respectively; p < 0.01 for both). Mean length of stay was greater in low- and medium-volume centres than in high-volume centres (by 7.7 and 9.2 days respectively, p < 0.01 for both). INTERPRETATION: This study adds to growing evidence that, for pancreatic resection for neoplasm, patients may have better outcomes if they are treated in high-volume hospitals rather than low-volume hospitals.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (142.7 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Deyo R. A., Cherkin D. C., Ciol M. A. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Jun;45(6):613–619. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90133-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Glasgow R. E., Mulvihill S. J. Hospital volume influences outcome in patients undergoing pancreatic resection for cancer. West J Med. 1996 Nov;165(5):294–300. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gordon T. A., Burleyson G. P., Tielsch J. M., Cameron J. L. The effects of regionalization on cost and outcome for one general high-risk surgical procedure. Ann Surg. 1995 Jan;221(1):43–49. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199501000-00005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hannan E. L., O'Donnell J. F., Kilburn H., Jr, Bernard H. R., Yazici A. Investigation of the relationship between volume and mortality for surgical procedures performed in New York State hospitals. JAMA. 1989 Jul 28;262(4):503–510. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lieberman M. D., Kilburn H., Lindsey M., Brennan M. F. Relation of perioperative deaths to hospital volume among patients undergoing pancreatic resection for malignancy. Ann Surg. 1995 Nov;222(5):638–645. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199511000-00006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luft H. S., Bunker J. P., Enthoven A. C. Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. N Engl J Med. 1979 Dec 20;301(25):1364–1369. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197912203012503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luft H. S., Hunt S. S., Maerki S. C. The volume-outcome relationship: practice-makes-perfect or selective-referral patterns? Health Serv Res. 1987 Jun;22(2):157–182. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wade T. P., Halaby I. A., Stapleton D. R., Virgo K. S., Johnson F. E. Population-based analysis of treatment of pancreatic cancer and Whipple resection: Department of Defense hospitals, 1989-1994. Surgery. 1996 Oct;120(4):680–687. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6060(96)80017-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]