Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine : Peer-reviewed, Official Publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine logoLink to Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine : Peer-reviewed, Official Publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine
. 2025 Jul 7;29(7):586–591. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24999

Clinical Profile, Intensive Care Needs, and Outcome of Children with Adenoviral Pneumonia: A Retrospective Study from a Tertiary Care Hospital in North India

Siva Vyasam 1, Jyothi Jayaram 2, Subhabrata Sarkar 3, Suresh Kumar Angurana 4,, Shubham Raj 5, Ishani Bora 6, Karthi Nallasamy 7, Arun Bansal 8, Jayashree Muralidharan 9, Radha K Ratho 10
PMCID: PMC12302261  PMID: 40734786

Abstract

Background and aims

Adenoviral pneumonia is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among children. There is limited data about the clinical profile, intensive care needs, and outcomes of children with adenoviral pneumonia from resource-limited settings.

Patients and methods

This retrospective study was conducted in the pediatric emergency room (PER) and pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of a tertiary care hospital in North India over a period of a period of 2 years (July 2022 to June 2024). The data collection included demographic and clinical features, laboratory investigations, complications, treatment, intensive care needs, and outcomes.

Results

Eighty-five children were enrolled, majority were <1 year of age and males (71.7% each). All presented with fever and respiratory symptoms. The common complications were acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (47%), multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) (26%), shock (25%), and encephalopathy (25%). PICU admission was needed in 46% of children. The intensive care needs included invasive mechanical ventilation (48%), CPAP (39%), HFNC (9%), vasoactive drugs (25%), IVIG (8%), RRT (6%), and cidofovir (5%). The duration of ER, PICU, and hospital stay was 48 (24–96) hours, 7 (4–14) days, and 9 (5–18) days, respectively. The mortality rate was 22%. On multivariate analysis, the independent predictors of mortality were low admission pH, myocardial dysfunction, acute kidney (AKI), ARDS, shock, encephalopathy, MODS, and healthcare-associated infection (HCAI).

Conclusion

Infants constituted the largest group of patients requiring admission for adenoviral infection to pediatric emergency in a tertiary care center. Common complications were ARDS, shock, MODS, and encephalopathy. Nearly half required PICU admission for organ support. The mortality rate was 22%; and low admission pH, myocardial dysfunction, AKI, ARDS, shock, encephalopathy, MODS, and HCAI were independent predictors of mortality.

How to cite this article

Vyasam S, Jayaram J, Sarkar S, Angurana SK, Raj S, Bora I, et al. Clinical Profile, Intensive Care Needs, and Outcome of Children with Adenoviral Pneumonia: A Retrospective Study from a Tertiary Care Hospital in North India. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025;29(7):586–591.

Keywords: Acute respiratory distress syndrome, Adenovirus, Cidofovir, Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, Pediatric intensive care unit

Highlights

  • Infants constituted the largest group of patients requiring admission for adenoviral infection to pediatric emergency in a tertiary care center.

  • Common complications were acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), shock, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), and encephalopathy.

  • PICU admission was needed in nearly half of the children and the mortality rate was 22%.

  • Low admission pH, myocardial dysfunction, acute kidney (AKI), ARDS, shock, encephalopathy, MODS, and healthcare-associated infection (HCAI) were independent predictors of mortality.

Introduction

Globally, human adenovirus is a leading cause of respiratory illnesses in children, accounting for approximately 5–10% of childhood pneumonia, with higher prevalence in those under five years of age.13 While most infections are mild and self-limiting, 1/3rd of cases develop severe pneumonia requiring intensive care and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality, particularly in resource-limited settings like India.1,2,46 After the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been an increase in adenoviral pneumonia among children.13,7

Recent studies have identified adenovirus as a significant pathogen in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs), with clinical presentations ranging from mild upper respiratory tract infections to severe pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), encephalopathy, and multiorgan dysfunction syndrome (MODS).13,7,8 Understanding the clinical characteristics and risk factors associated with poor outcomes in children with adenoviral pneumonia is crucial for early recognition and appropriate management. Previous studies have suggested that factors such as age, underlying comorbidities, development of complications, liver dysfunction, and healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs) were potential predictors of mortality.810 However, most of these studies are from developed countries, and their findings may not be directly applicable to resource-limited settings. Moreover, there is limited data from Indian settings regarding the clinical profile, complications, intensive care needs, and outcomes of children with adenoviral pneumonia.

Therefore, we planned this retrospective study to describe the clinical profile, complications, intensive care needs, outcomes, and predictors of mortality of children with adenoviral pneumonia admitted to the pediatric emergency room (PER) and PICU of a tertiary care hospital in North India.

Patients and Methods

This retrospective study was conducted in the PER and PICU of a tertiary care teaching hospital in North India over a period of 2 years (July 2022 to June 2024). The study protocol was approved by the Institute Ethics Committee and the manuscript was approved by the Departmental Review Board.

Children aged 1 month to 12 years with confirmed adenoviral pneumonia (positive nasopharyngeal swab for adenovirus by RT-PCR) and requiring admission to the ER or PICU were included. Data was collected from admission files and an electronic hospital database on a pre-structured data collection proforma. The data regarding demographic details (age, gender), clinical features, presence of underlying comorbidities, laboratory parameters, complications and organ dysfunction, treatment, PICU admission, and intensive care needs (mechanical ventilation, vasoactive drugs, blood products, and renal replacement therapy) was collected. The duration of PER, PICU, and hospital stay were noted. The outcome included survival or mortality.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome was defined according to the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference (PALICC-2) 2023 criteria.11 Multiorgan dysfunction syndrome is defined as the dysfunction of two or more organ systems. The shock was defined as per the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines.12 Acute kidney was defined using the KDIGO criteria.13 Healthcare-associated infections were defined according to CDC/NHSN surveillance definitions.14

All patients were managed according to standard unit protocols. This included respiratory support (oxygen therapy, noninvasive or invasive mechanical ventilation as required), fluid management and vasoactive support, antimicrobial, and antiviral therapy (if indicated), and other organ supportive care.

The primary outcome was mortality rate and secondary outcomes were clinical profile, intensive care needs, and predictors of mortality among children with adenoviral pneumonia.

Data were analyzed using [IBM SPSS Statistics V.29]. Continuous variables were expressed as median (interquartile range) and categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages. Univariate analysis was performed using the Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables and Chi-square or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of mortality. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

We planned to enroll all consecutive children admitted with adenoviral pneumonia to PER and PICU during the study period of 2 years.

Results

A total of 85 children with adenoviral pneumonia were enrolled. The majority of children were below 1 year of age (71.7%, n = 61) and with a male predominance (71.7%, n = 61). All children had fever and respiratory symptoms. Neurological and gastrointestinal symptoms were observed in 31.8% (n = 27) of children each. More than half of the children (54.1%) had respiratory failure at presentation. Underlying comorbidities were noted in 22.4% (n = 19) children with congenital cardiac disease and neurological/neuromuscular disease in 5.9% (n = 5) each; and suspected immunodeficiency and acute leukemia in 3.5% (n = 3) children each (Table 1).

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of children with adenoviral pneumonia

Category Total cases, n = 85
Male, n (%) 61 (71.7)
Age-groups (years), n (%)
<1 61 (71.7)
1–5 17 (20)
6–10 4 (4.7)
>10 3 (3.5)
Clinical features, n (%)
Fever 85 (100)
Respiratory symptoms 85 (100)
Neurological symptoms 27 (31.8)
Gastrointestinal symptoms 27 (31.8)
Renal symptoms 3 (3.5)
Presented in respiratory failure, n (%) 46 (54.1)
Underlying comorbidities, n (%) 19 (22.4)
Congenital cardiac disease 5 (5.9)
Neurological/neuromuscular disease 5 (5.9)
Suspected immunodeficiency 3 (3.5)
Acute leukemia 3 (3.5)
Chronic lung disease 2 (2.4)
Neonatal ventilation 1 (1.2)

Laboratory abnormalities included elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) (56.5%), anemia (28.2%), transaminitis (22.3%), thrombocytopenia (18.8%), and hypernatremia (6.7%). The median (IQR) values of CRP and d-dimer were 31 (13–106) mg% and 3457 (2688-3922) ng/mL, respectively (Table 2). Among enrolled children, three had coinfection with adenovirus and RSV, while one had coinfection with adenovirus and bocavirus.

Table 2.

Laboratory investigations at admission and laboratory abnormalities in children with adenoviral pneumonia

Laboratory parameter, median (Interquartile range) Total cases, n = 85
Hemoglobin (gm/%) 9.7 (8.6–13)
Total counts (per cumm) 8,200 (3,750–10,650)
Platelet counts (per cumm) 219,000 (150,000–313,000)
C-reactive protein (CRP, mg%) 32 (13–106)
Sodium (mEq/L) 138 (135–141)
Potassium (mEq/L) 4.6 (4.1.5)
Chloride (mEq/L) 104 (102–108)
Urea (mg%) 26 (19–44)
Creatinine (mg%) 0.3 (0.3–0.5)
Serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT, IU/L) 79 (40–168)
Serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT, IU/L) 41 (22–87)
International normalized ratio (INR) 1.2 (1.1–1.3)
d-Dimer (ng/mL) 3457 (2688–3922)
Laboratory abnormalities, n (%)
Elevated CRP 48 (56.5)
Anemia 24 (28.2)
Transaminitis 19 (22.3)
Thrombocytopenia 16 (18.8)
Hypernatremia 6 (7.1)
Hyponatremia 4 (4.7)
Hyperkalemia 4 (4.7)
Hypokalemia 4 (4.7)

CRP, C-reactive protein

Organ dysfunction included ARDS (47.1%), MODS (25.9%), shock and encephalopathy (24.7% each), liver dysfunction (22.3%), acute kidney injury (AKI) (20%), thrombocytopenia (18.9%), and myocardial dysfunction (15.3%). These children received antimicrobials including ceftriaxone (41.2%), meropenem and vancomycin (21.2% each), ampicillin-gentamicin (16.5%), azithromycin (16.5%), colistin (8.2%), and oseltamivir (5.9%). Cidofovir was administered in only 4.7% (n = 4) of children. Seven (8.2%) children received intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) for myocardial dysfunction/myocarditis (Table 3).

Table 3.

Complications, organ supportive therapies, and outcome in children with adenoviral pneumonia

Complications, n (%) Total cases, n = 85
Acute respiratory distress syndrome 40 (47.1)
Multiorgan dysfunction syndrome 22 (25.9)
Shock 21 (24.7)
Encephalopathy 21 (24.7)
Liver dysfunction 19 (22.3)
Acute kidney Injury 17 (20)
Thrombocytopenia 16 (18.9)
Myocardial dysfunction 13 (15.3)
Coagulopathy 5 (5.9)
Antimicrobials, n (%)
Ceftriaxone 35 (41.2)
Meropenem 18 (21.2)
Vancomycin 18 (21.2)
Ampicillin/Gentamicin 14 (16.5)
Azithromycin 14 (16.5)
Colistin 7 (8.2)
Oseltamivir 5 (5.9)
Cidofovir 4 (4.7)
Intravenous immunoglobulin, n (%) 7 (8.2)
Organ supportive therapy, n (%)
Pediatric intensive care unit admission 39 (45.9)
Invasive mechanical ventilation 41 (48.2)
Continuous positive airway pressure 33 (38.8)
High-flow nasal cannula oxygen 8 (9.4)
Noninvasive ventilation 3 (3.5)
Central venous catheter 35 (41.2)
Blood transfusion 25 (29.4)
Vasoactive drugs 21 (24.7)
Renal replacement therapy 5 (5.9)
Healthcare-associated infections, n (%) 12 (14.1)
Ventilator-associated pneumonia 10 (11.8)
Bloodstream infection 2 (2.3)
Duration, median (IQR)
Duration of emergency room stay (hours) 48 (24–96)
Duration of pediatric intensive care unit stay (days) 7 (4–14)
Duration of hospital stay (days) 9 (5–18)
Outcome, n (%)
Survived 66 (77.6)
Deaths 19 (22.3)

All cases were initially admitted to the ER, 45.9% (n = 39) were shifted to PICU, and 54.1% (n = 46) were managed in PER only. Organ supportive treatment included invasive mechanical ventilation (48.2%), CPAP (38.8%), central venous catheter placement (41.2%), blood/blood product transfusion (29.4%), vasoactive drugs (24.7%), and RRT (5.9%) (three peritoneal dialysis and two continuous renal replacement therapy). HCAIs were documented in 14.1% of children, with ventilator-associated pneumonia (11.8%) being the most common, followed by bloodstream infections (2.3%) (Table 3). The median (IQR) duration of PER, PICU, and hospital stay were 48 (24–96) hours, 7 (4–14) days, and 9 (5–18) days, respectively. The final outcomes were survival in 77.6% (n = 66), and mortality in 22.3% (n = 19) (Table 3). Among children admitted to PICU, the mortality rate was 33% (13/39), and among those who remained in PER, the mortality rate was 13% (6/46).

On univariate analysis, norsurvivors had significantly higher admission levels of urea, creatinine, serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT), and CRP; and had lower pH. Also, complications such as anemia, transaminitis, myocardial dysfunction, AKI, coagulopathy, ARDS, shock, MODS, encephalopathy, and HCAIs were significantly associated with mortality. On multivariate logistic regression, lower admission pH; and presence of myocardial dysfunction, AKI, ARDS, shock, MODS, and HCAIs were independent predictors of mortality (Table 4).

Table 4.

Predictors of mortality in children with adenoviral pneumonia

Patient characteristics Survivors, n = 66 Non-survivors, n = 19 Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
OR (95% CI)/ Mann–Whitney U p OR (95% CI) p
Age (years) 0.6 (0.3–2) 0.7 (0.3–2.3) 385 0.328
Males 50 (75.8) 8 (57.1) 0.4 (0.2–1.4) 0.192
Duration of illness 9 (5–19) 14 (9.2–24.2) 371 0.25
Underlying comorbidity 17 (25.8) 4 (21.4) 0.79 (0.2–3.26) 1
PICU admission 28 (42.4) 10 (52.6) 3.39 (1–11.9) 0.08
Hemoglobin 9.7 (8.7–13.7) 9.6 (8.3–13.8) 64.5 0.599
TLC 8,300 (8,750–10,700) 5,600 (8,300–10,100) 114 0.619
Platelet counts 2,14,500 (1,50,750–3,20,750) 2,00,000 (1,40,000–2,35,250) 371 0.316
Urea 24 (18–33) 55 (23–97) 208.5 0.002 1.1 (0.3–3.2) 0.99
Creatinine 0.3 (0.2–0.4) 0.8 (0.4–1.8) 201 0.001 1.55 (0.5–4.5) 0.42
SGOT 62 (37–144) 152 (60–1068) 267.5 0.022 1.0006 1
SGPT 33 (20–56) 49 (37–527) 265 0.02 1.0005 1
CRP 24 (10–83) 114 (57–162) 110 0.001 1.001 1
INR 1.2 (1.1–1.3) 1.2 (1.1–1.8) 146 0.329
D dimer 3283 (2509–3800) 3696 (2831–5942) 26 0.254
pH 7.3 (7.3–7.4) 7.3 (7.3) 232 0.004 0.5 (0.4–0.6) <0.05
Bicarbonate 24 (21–26) 22 (20-25) 344 0.152
Anemia 14 (21.2) 8 (42.1) 4.95 (1.4–16) <0.05 1.31 (0.5–3.2) 0.55
Liver dysfunction 10 (15.2) 7 (37) 5.6 (1.6–19) <0.05 1.6 (0.7–3.6) 0.26
Thrombocytopenia 9 (13.6) 5 (36) 3.5 (1–13) 0.063
Myocardial dysfunction 4 (6.1) 9 (47.3) 28 (6–123) <0.05 2.1 (1–4.2) 0.05
AKI 4 (6.1) 11 (58) 57 (11–289) <0.05 2.5 (1.2–5.4) 0.02
Coagulopathy 1 (1.5) 3 (16) 17.7 (1.6–186) <0.05 1.1 (0.–1.6) 0.77
ARDS 23 (34.8) 19 (100) <0.05 6.4 (3.1–13) <0.05
Shock 6 (9.1) 19 (100) <0.05 3.7 (1.6–8.8) <0.05
MODS 6 (9.1) 17 (93) 130 (14–1173) <0.05 3.8 (1.7–8.9) <0.05
Encephalopathy 8 (12.1) 12 (64) 13 (3.5–48) <0.05 1.3 (0.6–3) 0.48
HCAI 7 (10.6) 5 (27) 4.68 (1.2–18) <0.05 7.5 (2.3–24) <0.05

Bold text indicate significant p-values. AKI, acute kidney injury; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; CI, confidence interval; CRP, C-reactive protein; HCAI, healthcare-associated infection; INR, international normalized ratio; MODS, multiorgan dysfunction syndrome; OR, odds ratio; PICU, pediatric intensive care unit; SGOT, serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase; SGPT, serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase; TLC, total leukocyte count

Discussion

Adenoviral pneumonia remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly in young children, with greater impact among those with severe disease requiring intensive care, especially in resource-limited settings.13 Recent studies demonstrated that adenovirus contributed to nearly 25% of children admitted to PICU with respiratory viral infections and associated with high mortality.3,7,15 In the post-COVID-19 pandemic period, there has been a paradigm shift in the epidemiology, clinical presentation, and severity patterns of respiratory viral infections with increased occurrence of pneumonia due to adenovirus among children.13,7,1624

The predominance of a high proportion of infants (71.7%) aligns closely with findings of previous studies,1,2,7,10,25 which highlights the vulnerability of younger children to severe adenoviral infections, likely due to their immature immune systems and limited adaptive immunity.4,7

The most common complications noted were ARDS (47.1%), MODS (25.9%), shock (24.7%), encephalopathy (24.7%), liver dysfunction (22.3%), and AKI (20%). The high prevalence of severe pulmonary and extrapulmonary complications in the index cohort mirrors the patterns observed in recent studies of adenoviral respiratory infections among children.1,2,10,2628 Varadarajan et al.1 reported similar rates of complications in children with adenoviral pneumonia (ARDS 42%, MODS 23%, shock 28%). Bera et al.2 highlighted that ARDS was a key complication in a series of children with severe acute respiratory infections due to adenovirus. The high prevalence of these complications reflects the respiratory tropism of adenovirus and its potential to cause severe pulmonary injury, systemic inflammation, and multiorgan dysfunction.1,2,10 Neurological complications, particularly encephalopathy were noted in 24.7% of children in index study, which is much higher than the usual reported rates of neurological complications in adenovirus infection among children (<2%).28,29 Higher rate of pulmonary and extrapulmonary complications emphasizes the need for vigilant monitoring and prompt intervention to treat these complications.

The intensive care needs in the index study showed similarities with findings by Varadarajan et al.1 in terms of invasive mechanical ventilation (48.2% vs 45%), central line placement (41.2% vs 38%), and blood transfusion (29.4% vs 32%). These comparable rates suggest consistent patterns of intensive care needs, organ support requirements, and resource utilization in severe adenovirus infections across Indian tertiary care centers.1,2,21

Although there is some evidence that cidofovir reduces adenovirus load and improves survival, it has not been widely used in children and there are no established clinical guidelines for the use of cidofovir in children with adenoviral pneumonia.8 We started using cidofovir in mid-2024 and it was used in four cases (4.7%). Due to limited availability, financial issues, and no clear-cut guidelines, not all children with adenoviral pneumonia received cidofovir. In the index study, IVIG was used in children with myocardial dysfunction/myocarditis. (n = 7, 8.2%) based on the severity of the disease and hemodynamic status. As this was a retrospective study, the usage of cidofovir and IVIG was guided by the availability at that point of time cost factor/affordability (for cidofovir), and discretion of the treating pediatric intensivist.

The mortality rate in index study was 22.3% which is higher than reported mortality rates in Indian studies (12–15.8%) and global figures (8–12%) among children admitted in PICU with adenovirus infection.1,2,9,10 These findings highlight that there is a substantial burden of adenoviral pneumonia among critically ill children in India. The higher mortality in Indian settings may be attributed to delayed presentations, resource limitations, or differences in healthcare infrastructure. The mortality in the PICU and ER cohorts was 33% and 13%, respectively. This suggested that the majority of cases with severe disease were managed in PICU and had higher mortality than those who remained in PER.

The pattern of extrapulmonary complications and mortality aligns with a recent study from our unit involving children admitted with non-COVID-19 severe acute respiratory infections during the COVID-19 pandemic.16 This parallel trend suggests a broader pattern of severe viral respiratory infections in children during the pandemic and in the postpandemic era. Postpandemic, in addition to an increase in respiratory infections due to adenovirus among critically ill children, other viral pathogens like human metapneumovirus and bocavirus have been reported to cause multisystem involvement and severe complications.22,30

Univariate analysis demonstrated that norsurvivors had significantly higher levels of urea, creatinine, SGOT, SGPT, and CRP; had lower pH; and higher rates of anemia, liver dysfunction, myocardial dysfunction, AKI, coagulopathy, ARDS, shock, MODS, encephalopathy, and HCAIs. These findings suggest that multiorgan dysfunction plays a critical role in the progression of severe adenoviral infection. Elevated CRP levels, indicative of systemic inflammation, have been associated with severe disease and poor outcomes in adenoviral pneumonia.31,32 Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that lower admission pH; and presence of myocardial dysfunction, AKI, ARDS, shock, liver dysfunction, MODS, and HCAIs were independent predictors of mortality. These findings are consistent with previous studies where AKI, shock, MODS, and HCAIs were significant predictors of mortality in adenovirus infection.1,2,810

HCAIs were documented in 14.1% of children in the index study comparable to other studies from India (10%),1,2 reflecting variations in infection control practices, longer PICU stay, and need for mechanical ventilation in these children. This finding has relevance in resource-limited settings where HCAIs burden remains substantial highlighting the urgent need for robust infection prevention strategies in intensive care settings.

The strengths of this study include a comprehensive analysis of clinical and laboratory data, complications, intensive care needs, and outcomes, among children with adenoviral pneumonia. The use of standardized definitions ensured consistency and reliability in the findings. The independent predictors of mortality were identified, contributing to a deeper understanding of factors influencing patient outcomes. The limitations of this study include a single-center design with limited generalizability of the findings to other clinical settings. There is a lack of long-term outcomes leaving gaps in the understanding of the extended impact of adenoviral pneumonia. As a tertiary care center, there may be a potential for referral bias, which could have influenced the study results.

Conclusion

Infants constituted the largest group of patients requiring admission for adenoviral infection to pediatric emergency in a tertiary care center. Common complications noted were ARDS (47%), MODS (26%), shock (25%), liver dysfunction (22%), and AKI (20%). Nearly half of children required PICU admission for organ support. Lower admission pH; and presence of myocardial dysfunction, AKI, ARDS, shock, MODS, and HCAIs were independent predictors of mortality.

IEC Approval

IEC approval was obtained from the IEC (intramural), PGIMER, Chandigarh. Letter no.: INT/IEC/2023/SPL-1022A dated 21/11/2023.

Author Contribution

SV, data collection, data analysis, literature review, and manuscript preparation. JJ, data collection, literature review, and data analysis. SS, data collection, virological investigations, and review of manuscript. SKA, conceptualized the study, supervised data collection and data analysis, and reviewed the manuscript. SR, data analysis. IB, Data collection, virological investigations, and review of manuscript. KN, supervised data analysis and reviewed the manuscript. AB, supervised data collection and reviewed the manuscript. JM, conceptualized the study designs and reviewed the manuscript. RKR, conceptualized the study designs, supervised virological investigations, and reviewed the manuscript.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank the Regional Virus Research and Diagnostic Laboratory (RVRDL), Department of Health Research, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW), Government of India, for providing infrastructure and consumables to carry out the study.

Orcid

Siva Vyasam https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0887-1535

Jyothi Jayaram https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0377-4625

Subhabrata Sarkar https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8880-8458

Suresh Kumar Angurana https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6370-8258

Shubham Raj https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4998-4632

Ishani Bora https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7573-3300

Karthi Nallasamy https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6713-9846

Arun Bansal https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6212-6889

Jayashree Muralidharan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6149-1355

Radha K Ratho https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7205-9325

Footnotes

Source of support: Nil

Conflict of interest: None

References

  • 1.Varadarajan P, Subramanian R, Srividya G, Rangabashyam N, Subramani S. Clinical profile of children with adenovirus infection – a hospital-based observational study. Indian Pediatr. 2024;61(9):839–844. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bera R, Pallavi P, Saxena S, Chawla S, Jhamb U, Saxena R. Adenoviral infection in children admitted with severe acute respiratory infection at tertiary care hospital from North India: A case series. J Pediatr Crit Care. 2024;11(5):233–237. doi: 10.4103/jpcc.jpcc_46_24. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Beura S, Rath D, Biswal B, Panigrahi M, Parida B. Adenovirus respiratory infection with severe pneumonia in hospitalized children: A case series. J Trop Pediatr. 2024;70(6) doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmae034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lion T. Adenovirus infections in immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014;27(3):441–462. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00116-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vashisht R, Mirzai S, Koval C, Duggal A. Adenovirus-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome: Need for a protocol-based approach. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020;24(5):367–368. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pujari CG, Lalitha AV, Raj JM, Kavilapurapu A. Epidemiology of acute respiratory distress syndrome in pediatric intensive care unit: Single-center experience. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2022;26(8):949–955. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cohen S, Dabaja-Younis H, Etshtein L, Gnatt I, Szwarcwort-Cohen M, Hadash A, et al. Burden of viral respiratory infections in the pediatric intensive care unit: Age, virus distribution, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur J Pediatr. 2024;184(1):88. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05914-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shi J, Zhou Y, Wang F, Wang C, Miao H, Sun T, et al. A case series of children with adenovirus pneumonia: Three-year experiences in a tertiary PICU. BMC Pediatr. 2020;20(1):375. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02269-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lynch JP, 3rd,, Kajon AE. Adenovirus: Epidemiology, global spread of novel types, and approach to treatment. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2021;42(6):800–821. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1733802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rajkumar V, Chiang CS, Low JM, Cui L, Lin RT, Tee NW, et al. Risk factors for severe adenovirus infection in children during an outbreak in Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2015;44(2):50–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference G Pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: Consensus recommendations from the pediatric acute lung injury consensus Conference. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015;16(5):428–439. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Weiss SL, Peters MJ, Alhazzani W, Agus MSD, Flori HR, Inwald DP, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign international guidelines for the management of septic shock and sepsis-associated organ dysfunction in children. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020;21(2):e52–e106. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Khwaja A. KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury. Nephron Clin Pract. 2012;120(4):c179–184. doi: 10.1159/000339789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control. 2008;36(5):309–332. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wong JJM, Abbas Q, Wang JQY, Xu W, Dang H, Phan PH, et al. Severe pneumonia in PICU admissions: The pediatric acute and critical care medicine asian network (PACCMAN) observational cohort study, 2020-2022. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2024;25(11):1035–1044. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Agarwal A, Jayashree M, Angurana SK, Sharma R, Ghosh A, Singh MP, et al. Clinical profile, intensive care needs and predictors of outcome among children admitted with non-COVID severe acute respiratory illness (SARI) during the pandemic. Indian J Pediatr. 2024;91(4):329–336. doi: 10.1007/s12098-023-04860-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Angurana SK, Takia L, Sarkar S, Jangra I, Bora I, Ratho RK, et al. Clinico-virological profile, intensive care needs, and outcome of infants with acute viral bronchiolitis: A prospective observational study. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021;25(11):1301–1317. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kang M, Sarkar S, Angurana SK, Singh P, Rana M, Bora I, et al. Paradigm shift of respiratory viruses causing lower respiratory tract infection in children during COVID-19 pandemic in India. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2023;17(7):961–970. doi: 10.3855/jidc.17727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Takia L, Awasthi P, Angurana SK. Impact of COVID-19 on acute viral bronchiolitis hospitalization among infants in North India. Indian J Pediatr. 2021;88(11):1154. doi: 10.1007/s12098-021-03905-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Angurana SK, Takia L, Awasthi P. Impact of COVID-19 on acute viral bronchiolitis hospitalization among infants in North India: Authors' reply. Indian J Pediatr. 2022;89(4):423. doi: 10.1007/s12098-021-04034-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Singh C, Angurana SK, Bora I, Jain N, Kaur K, Sarkar S. Clinico demographic profiling of the Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infected children admitted in tertiary care hospital in North India. J Family Med Prim Care. 2021;10(5):1975–1980. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2406_20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sarkar S, Kang M, Angurana SK, Prasad S, Bora I, Singh P, et al. Clinical course and molecular characterization of human bocavirus associated with acute lower respiratory tract infections in a tertiary care hospital in Northern India. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2024;77(4):227–235. doi: 10.7883/yoken.JJID.2023.251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sarkar S, Ratho RK, Singh M, Singh MP, Singh A, Sharma M. Role of viral load and host cytokines in determining the disease severity of respiratory syncytial virus-associated acute lower respiratory tract infections in children. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2023;76(4):233–239. doi: 10.7883/yoken.JJID.2022.673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sarkar S, Ratho RK, Singh M, Singh MP, Singh A, Sharma M. Comparative analysis of epidemiology, clinical features, and cytokine response of respiratory syncytial and human metapneumovirus infected children with acute lower respiratory infections. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2022;75(1):56–62. doi: 10.7883/yoken.JJID.2021.151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Buonsenso D, Camporesi A, Viozzi F, Lazzareschi I, Manca L, Caci A, et al. Determinants of antibiotic prescription in children with adenovirus respiratory tract infections. Eur J Pediatr. 2024;183(8):3489–3497. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05615-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Takia L, Saini L, Keshavan S, Angurana SK, Nallasamy K, Suthar R, et al. Neurological manifestations of influenza A (H1N1): Clinical features, intensive care needs, and outcome. Indian J Pediatr. 2020;87(10):803–809. doi: 10.1007/s12098-020-03297-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Angurana SK, Williams V, Takia L. Acute viral bronchiolitis: A narrative review. J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2023;12(2):79–86. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1715852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wang C, Liu J, Mi Y, Chen J, Bi J, Chen Y. Clinical features and epidemiological analysis of respiratory human adenovirus infection in hospitalized children: A cross-sectional study in Zhejiang. Virol J. 2021;18(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s12985-021-01705-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhang XF, Tan CB, Yao ZX, Jiang L, Hong SQ. Adenovirus infection-associated central nervous system disease in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2021;40(3):205–208. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000003000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Prasad S, N D, Sarkar S, Bora I, Ratho RK, Angurana SK. Human metapneumovirus infection and multisystemic disease in an infant. Indian J Pediatr. 2023;90(9):951. doi: 10.1007/s12098-023-04653-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhang J, Xu C, Yan S, Zhang X, Zhao D, Liu F. A nomogram for predicting severe adenovirus pneumonia in children. Front Pediatr. 2023;11:1122589. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1122589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhong H, Dong X. Analysis of clinical characteristics and risk factors of severe adenovirus pneumonia in children. Front Pediatr. 2021;9:566797. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.566797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine : Peer-reviewed, Official Publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine are provided here courtesy of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine

RESOURCES