Abstract
The in situ-generated thiocarbonyl S-methanides (thiocarbonyl ylides), derived from cycloaliphatic thioketones, are efficiently trapped by enolizable 1-substitued 5-mercapto-1H-tetrazoles and formation of the corresponding N–H or S–H insertion products, i.e., thioaminals or dithioacetals, respectively, was observed. In some instances, both products were formed side by side and could be separated by chromatography. Two novel, sterically overcrowded bis-spiro(cyclopentyl) and bis-spiro(cyclohexyl)-substituted thiocarbonyl S-methanides were thermally generated from the corresponding 1,3,4-thiadiazolines and their reactivity towards 5-mercapto-1H-tetrazoles was compared with well-known analogues derived from adamantanethione and 2,2,4,4-tetramethyl-3-thioxocyclobutanone. Some of the isolated thioaminals were observed to undergo thermal isomerization in CDCl3 solution yielding the corresponding dithioacetals. Structural analysis of the isolated products of S–H and N–H insertion was carried out based on spectroscopic data (1H and 13C NMR) and the structures of two representatives were established by using the X-ray single crystal diffraction analysis method. Biological activity (cytotoxicity) of some selected products derived from 5-mercapto-1H-tetrazoles was also examined.
Keywords: 2,5-dihydro-1,3,4-thiadiazoles; enolizable 5-mercapto-1H-tetrazoles; insertion reactions; thiiranes; thiocarbonyl ylides; X-ray analysis
Introduction
Cycloaddition reactions, including 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions, are considered as one of the most important types of organic reactions with key importance for the development of methods of modern organic synthesis [1–3]. Therefore, conversions of 1,3-dipoles which cover not only cycloadditions but also annulation and insertion reaction attract great attention worldwide [2–4]. Thiocarbonyl S-methanides (thiocarbonyl ylides) 1, which were first reported in the 1980s by R. Huisgen and co-workers contributed to a substantial extension of mechanistic interpretations of cycloaddition reactions and to rapid development of methods applied not only for the synthesis of sulfur heterocycles but also for the synthesis of sulfur-containing organic compounds in general [2,5–6].
Thiocarbonyl S-methanides 1 belong to the class of so-called S-centered, electron-rich 1,3-dipoles and in numerous studies, thermal decomposition of 1,3,4-thiadiazolines 2, which are easily accessible via [3 + 2]-cycloaddition of respective thiocarbonyl dipolarophiles (preferably non-enolizable thioketones) with diazomethane, was demonstrated as a favorable method for their generation [5–6]. In the past three decades, 1,3-dipoles 1 have extensively been studied as useful building blocks for the preparation of various five-membered heterocycles via [3 + 2]-cycloaddition reactions. Depending on the type of the dipolarophile used in these reactions, the target heterocycles may contain only one sulfur atom (cycloadditions with C=C or C≡C dipolarophiles) or more heteroatoms (cycloadditions with C=S, C=O, C=N, N=N, S=O, N=S=O, etc. dipolarophiles) [5–10] (Scheme 1, upper part).
Scheme 1.
Typical [3 + 2] cycloaddition (above) and trapping (below) reactions of thiocarbonyl S-methanides 1a and 1b derived from cycloaliphatic thiones (adamantanethione (7a) and 3-thioxo-2,2,4,4-tetramethylcyclobutanone (7b), respectively).
Notably, [3 + 2]-cycloadditions of the sterically crowded thiocarbonyl S-methanide 1b with electron deficient, tetrasubstituted ethylenes activated with CN and CF3 (or CN and CO2Me) groups were encountered as the first examples of non-concerted, step wise cycloadditions leading to mixtures of five- and seven-membered heterocyclic products (cycloadducts), and respective zwitterionic intermediates were postulated to explain the unexpected reaction pathway [11].
Due to the practically equal electronegativity of carbon and sulfur (χ = 2.55 (for C) and χ = 2.58 (for S) according to the Pauling scale), thiocarbonyl S-methanides 1 are considered as electron-rich 1,3-dipoles with basic and nucleophilic reactivity displayed by the =S+–CH2‒ unit [6]. Therefore, acidic compounds of type R–XH (X = NR’, O, S), which are able to protonate this basic fragment, undergo 1,3-addition leading to corresponding products of S,S-, O,S-, or N,S-acetal type. For example, trapping of the in situ-generated adamantanethione S-methanide (1a) with tert-butylthiol or benzyl alcohol leads to the corresponding S,S-dithioacetal and O,S-thioacetal, respectively [2,6]. On the other hand, enolizable imidazole-2-thiones and pyrimidine-2-thione were reported to react with 1a and 1b yielding S,S-dithioacetals as exclusive trapping/insertion products [12] (Scheme 1). Notably, enolizable nitrogen heterocycles such as imidazole and pyrazole, or bicyclic heterocycles like saccharin and phthalimide, reacted with 1a and 1b yielding the corresponding N–H insertion products [13–14] (Scheme 1, lower part).
In a recent publication, ring opening reactions of so-called D–A cyclopropanes (dimethyl 2-arylcyclopropane-1,1-dicarboxylates 3), initiated by a nucleophilic attack of 1-substituted 5-mercapto-1H-tetrazoles 4 [15] and other structurally similar enolizable mercapto azaheterocycles [16], leading to the S- and N-insertion products of type 5 and 6, respectively, were described (Scheme 2). Remarkably, in this study, the influence of the Ar substituent on the chemoselectivity was observed.
Scheme 2.
Ambident reactivity of 5-mercapto-1H-tetrazoles 4 towards dimethyl 2-arylcyclopropane dicarboxylates 3; formation of the S- and N-insertion products 5 and 6, respectively [15].
A detailed study on the mechanism of these reactions showed that the initially formed S–H insertion products (type 5) underwent thermal isomerization leading to thermodynamically more stable N–H insertion ones (type 6) (Scheme 2) and the isomerization process was clearly dependent on the substitution pattern of both substrates, i.e., substituent Ar in the starting cyclopropane 3 and the R–N(1) moiety in the tetrazole derivative 4 [15].
Taking into account the known and widely documented importance of enolizable 5-mercapto-1H-tetrazoles as important bioisosters [17–21] we decided to study selected heterocycles of this type in reactions with thiocarbonyl S-methanides 1a–d, derived from cycloaliphatic thioketones, which belong to the class of so called ‘sulfur centered 1,3-dipoles’ [6]. Thus, the goal of the present study was the examination of the behavior of the in situ-generated 1 towards enolizable 5-mercapto-1H-tetrazoles 4 bearing various aliphatic and aromatic substituents at the N(1) atom. Competition between the expected S–H and N–H insertion processes was of primary interest. In extension of the synthetically oriented study, bioactivity of selected products formed via S–H and N–H insertion reactions should also be tested. This method of modification of the structure of enolizable 5-mercapto-1H-tetrazole has not yet been described.
Results and Discussion
New precursors 2c,d of sterically crowded thiocarbonyl S-methanides 1c,d
Based on the well-established methodology, transient thiocarbonyl S-methanides 1 should be generated in situ by thermal decomposition of their precursors, i.e., spiro-1,3,4-thiadiazolines 2 [5–6]. In contrast to adamantanethione (7a), which reacts with diazomethane (CH2N2) yielding a mixture of regioisomeric 1,3,4- and 1,2,3-thiadiazoline 2a and 2’a, respectively [22], cyclobutanethione 7b undergoes the same [3 + 2]-cycloaddition to give crystalline 1,3,4-thiadiazoline 2b as the sole product (Scheme 3) [23]. In the case of 7a the ratio of cycloadducts 2a and 2’a strongly depends on the type of the solvent used in the experiment and a striking difference observed in the reactions performed in petroleum ether and in methanol is presented in Scheme 3 [22]. This amazing effect was studied in detail and discussed in later publications by R. Huisgen et al. [24–25]. Two dispiro-thioketones 7c and 7d, which are also known [26–27], were analogously treated with CH2N2 at ca. 0 °C and the expected cycloadducts 2c and 2d were formed with complete regioselectivity, and subsequently could be isolated in good yields without a remarkable decomposition (Scheme 3).
Scheme 3.
Regioselectivity of [3 + 2] cycloadditions of diazomethane with adamantanethione (7a) [22,24–25], and sterically crowded thioketones 7b [28], as well as 7c,d derived from cyclobutanedione.
Thermal decomposition of 2a and 2b, and the behavior of the corresponding thiocarbonyl S-methanides 1a and 1b, respectively, in situ generated at 45 °C in absence of any trapping reagent, were described in earlier publications [6,10–14,28]. In the present study, the thermal stability of the new dispiro-1,3,4-thiadiazolines 2c and 2d was tested in THF solution at a slightly higher temperature (60 °C). In both cases, evolution of nitrogen was completed after ca. 3 h and pure thiiranes 8a and 8b were isolated as sole products in 62%, and 58% yield, respectively (Scheme 4). Thus, their formation clearly evidenced formation of the respective thiocarbonyl S-methanides 1c,d, respectively, as the expected reactive intermediates after N2 elimination from 2c and 2d.
Scheme 4.
The in situ generation of sterically crowded thiocarbonyl S-methanides 1c,d (via a 1,3-dipolar cycloreversion) in absence of any trapping reagent and their electrocyclization (ring closure) leading to thiiranes 8a,b.
Trapping of transient thiocarbonyl S-methanides 1 with enolizable 1-substituted 5-mercapto-1H-tetrazoles 4
Adamantanethione S-methanide (1a) is considered as a prominent representative of the ‘sulfur-centered 1,3-dipoles’ and its chemistry has been reported in numerous publications [6–7,10–14]. Therefore, it was selected to perform a test trapping-experiment with enolizable 5-mercapto-1-methyl-1H-tetrazole (4a). The reaction with nearly equimolar amounts of 1,3,4-thiadiazoline 2a and 4a was typically carried out at 45 °C in THF solution, and evolution of N2 was monitored using a nitrometer connected with the reaction flask. When the evolution of the gas was completed, the solvent was evaporated, and the crude residue was checked by means of 1H NMR. Two high-field shifted singlets, attributed to the Me‒S and Me‒N moieties were found at 1.86 and 3.86 ppm, respectively, and they were accompanied by two multiplets, attributed to two CH units of the adamantane ring, found at 2.37‒2.44 and 2.47‒2.54 ppm. To our delight, simple fractional crystallization from hexane with small admixture of CH2Cl2 led to isolation of a colorless, crystalline material with a narrow melting point of 107‒109 °C (yield 66%). The 1H NMR spectrum registered for the purified product perfectly fitted with that one of the crude mixture and thereby confirmed formation of a single product with a single set of the Me‒S and Me‒N groups located at the above reported shifts.
In the 13C NMR spectrum their signals were found in typical regions at 33.5 (NCH3) and 10.3 (SCH3) ppm, respectively. A characteristic signal of the –NCS− atom of the thioaminale moiety, located in the Ad-skeleton was found at 81.2 ppm. Finally, the signal located at 162.9 ppm was attributed to the C=S unit (thiourea type) and the chemical shift corresponded in this case very well with the respective data found for the N-insertion products of the reaction of 4a with dimethyl 2-phenylcyclopropane-1,1-dicarboxylate [11]. In addition, elemental analysis confirmed the molecular formula C17H20N4S2 corresponding to an anticipated 1:1 insertion product. Based on all these data, the isolated product was identified as thioaminal 9a formed with complete chemoselectivity from the in situ-generated 1a and 4a (Scheme 5, Table 1).
Scheme 5.
Reactions of the in situ-generated thiocarbonyl S-methanides 1 (from 1,3,4-thiadiazolines 2) with enolizable 5-mercapto-1H-tetrazoles 4, leading to the N- or S-insertion products 9 and 10, respectively.
Table 1.
Products of the reactions between thiocarbonyl S-methanides 1a‒d and 5-mercapto-1H-tetrazoles 4a–e.
Precursor 2 | 5-Mercapto- 1H-tetrazole 4 |
Thioaminals 9 (yield %)a |
Dithioacetals 10 (yield %)a |
| |||
a | a | a (66) | a b |
a | b | b (52) | b b |
b | a | c b | c (84) |
b | b | d b | d (76) |
b | c | e b | e (72) |
b | d | f b | f (82) |
b | e | g b | g (46) |
c | a | h (36) | h (47) |
c | b | i (48) | i (49) |
c | c | j (46) | j (29) |
c | d | k (33) | k (63) |
c | e | l (45) | l (50) |
d | a | m b | m (46) |
d | b | n b | n (72) |
d | c | o b | o (52) |
d | d | p b | p (89) |
d | e | q b | q (77) |
aCalculated for isolated compounds 9 and 10; bnot found in the crude reaction mixture.
Notably, the same chemoselectivity was observed in reactions of 1a with 5-mercaptotetrazole 4b. However, due to a lower reactivity observed for 4c,d towards 1a, the experiments with these derivatives were unsuccessful and formation of undesired side products was observed in both cases.
Unexpectedly, a different chemoselectivity was observed in reactions with 1b. For example, thermal decomposition of 2b performed in THF solution at 45 °C in the presence of 4a (molar ratio 1.1:1.0) led to the exclusive formation of the S-insertion product, i.e., dithioacetal 10c, which was isolated after chromatographic workup as a crystalline compound (mp 136‒138 °C) in high yield of 86%. The 13C NMR spectrum registered for this compound revealed a shift of the S‒C‒S atom, incorporated into the cyclobutanone ring, at 74.8 ppm. On the other hand, the thioaminal functionality with N‒C‒S moiety located within the tetrazole ring, shows a signal at 151.3 ppm. All products of type 10 in this series were obtained as crystalline materials in satisfactory to high yields (46‒86%) (Scheme 5, Table 1).
In contrast to 1a and 1b, trapping reactions of the sterically overcrowded S-methanide 1c with 5-mercaptotetrazoles 4 occurred with no remarkable selectivity, and in all cases formation of insertion products of both types, i. e., thioaminals 9 and dithioacetales 10, was observed (see Table 1). Chromatographic separation enabled the isolation of pure compounds, and the more stable dithioacetals 10 formed the more polar fraction. The less polar fraction contained thioaminals 9, which underwent a slow isomerization in CDCl3 solution. Notably, in the case of products 9k and 10k, bearing a Ph group at N(1), after a successful chromatographic separation, the less stable 9k underwent isomerization in CDCl3 solution (at rt) and no registration of NMR spectra of this product, without contamination with 10k, was feasible.
Thioaminal 9i and dithioacetal 10i derived from 1-cyclohexyl-5-mercapto-4H-tetrazole (4b) could be isolated as stable, crystalline products and the postulated structures were unambiguously confirmed by the single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis (Figure 1a and Figure 1b, respectively).
Figure 1.
(a) Molecular structure of the N-insertion product (thioaminal) 9i. Atoms are represented by thermal ellipsoids (50%). For graphics with atoms labelling see Figure S22(a) (Supporting Information File 1); (b) molecular structure of the S-insertion product (dithioacetal) 10i. Atoms are represented by thermal ellipsoids (50%). For graphics with atoms labelling see Figure S22(b) in Supporting Information File 1.
Single crystals of 9i and 10i were obtained by slow evaporation from a hexane/CH2Cl2 solution and subsequently used for crystallographic X-ray measurements. In the case of 9i, the molecule is strongly disordered in the outer carbon ring regions. However, the quality of the X-ray measurements and structure determination meets all high standards for reliable data. The same applies to the crystal data of 10i, even though its crystal structure contains four independent molecules per unit cell. These molecules exhibit slight differences in their geometry, ensuring that no additional symmetry elements were omitted during structure refinement.
The obtained data undoubtedly confirmed the anticipated structures and their experimental characterizations. Thioaminal 9i and dithioacetal 10i differ significantly in the substitution of the tetrazole ring. This crucial difference in the molecular structures is best reflected in the length of the respective C–S bonds. In 9i, this bond should be considered as a standard thiocarbonyl group, whereas in 10i it corresponds more closely to a C–S single bond. Consequently, in 9i, the C(20)–S(21) bond (formally a double bond) has a length of 1.650(13) Å. For comparison, this distance in other tetrazole-thiones has been reported as 1.669(3) Å [29] and 1.719(6) Å [30]. Thus, the C=S bond in 9i appears slightly shorter (more localized) than in comparable examples. On the other hand, the C(20)–S(21) bond length in 9i is typical for a C=S double bond. Conversely, in 10i the corresponding C1(A–D)–S16(A–D) bond length (with A–D indicating the four independent molecules in the unit cell) ranges from 1.823 to 1.831(4) Å. This distance is characteristic of a formal C–S single bond [31] (and references therein).
Finally, trapping reactions (toluene, 60 °C) performed with 2d, functionalized with two spiro-cyclohexyl rings, and 5-mercaptotetrazoles 4a‒e led selectively to dithioacetals 10m‒q, which could be separated chromatographically as crystalline materials in good yields (46‒89%). Isomeric thioaminals of type 9 were not observed in the 1H NMR spectra registered for crude reaction mixtures (Table 1).
The mechanism of the studied reactions deserves a brief comment and should help to clarify whether the formation of 9 and 10 results from the ambident reactivity of 5-mercapto-1H-tetrazoles, suggested in some earlier publications [15], or/and from secondary processes, like an intramolecular rearrangement. Taking into account the postulated basicity (and nucleophilicity) of thiocarbonyl S-methanides 1 derived from cycloaliphatic thioketones [6], the initiating step of these processes can be presented as protonation of the terminal S‒CH2 position, leading to the formation of the sulfonium cation 11 and the delocalized heterocyclic anion 12 (Scheme 6). In the next step, competitive addition of both intermediate species yields either thioaminals 9 or dithioacetals 10. However, a slow isomerization of the thermodynamically less stable 9 into the more stable 10 was observed in some cases (derived from 1c) in the CDCl3 solution at room temperature. Therefore, it seems likely that the first step of the reaction is the N–H insertion process.
Scheme 6.
Stepwise mechanism of the competitive N- and S-insertion reactions between the in situ-generated thiocarbonyl S-methanides 1 and 1-substituted 5-mercapto-1H-tetrazoles 4.
The compositions of the obtained crude mixtures suggest that the final addition step depends on both steric factors in 11 and the electronic structure of the reactive anion 12. In general, growing steric hindrance prefers the S-attack and, very likely, hinders rearrangement leading to thioaminals 9. This hypothesis is supported by the fact that no formation of products 9 is observed with the sterically most hindered dispiro-cyclohexyl-substituted thiocarbonyl S-methanide 2d. Notably, in some cases spontaneous isomerization of the generally less stable thioaminals 9 in CDCl3 solution at room temperature was also observed. It seems likely that this isomerization follows an intramolecular pathway, which is accelerated in the zwitterionic form 9’ (Scheme 7).
Scheme 7.
Mechanism of the isomerization of initially formed thioaminals 9 to dithioacetals 10.
Striking differences in the structure of products obtained under identical conditions (THF, 45 °C) from 1a (only thioaminals 9) and from 1b (only dithioacetals 10), deserves also a brief comment. Notably, there were no substantial differences in reactivity of thiocarbonyl S-methanides 1a and 1b reported in earlier studies on their [3 + 2]-cycloadditions [6,10–11] or insertion reactions [12–14]. Therefore, a likely interpretation for the observed difference in the present study can be based on the assumption that the initial products are thioaminals 9, which under the reaction conditions or later on, during the storage in CDCl3 solution, undergo an intramolecular rearrangement presented in Scheme 7. Moreover, the differences observed in the structures of products obtained in reactions with structurally similar cyclobutanone derivatives 1b, 1c and 1d suggest that the type of the spiro-substituent may play an important role in the rearrangement process. Whereas thioaminals 9 obtained in reactions with 1b and 1d tend to easily undergo the rearrangement leading to the corresponding dithioacetals 10, the analogous process in the series of products derived from 1c is slower (and reversible?), and therefore, corresponding products of both N- and S-insertion are side by side observed as components of the crude reaction mixtures and their ratio was always ca. 55:45. In the latter case, chromatographic separation of the isomeric products was a feasible operation.
Cytotoxicity of selected thioaminals 9 and dithioacetals 10 in cancer and non-cancer cells
Cytotoxicity investigations represent a pivotal component in the realm of pharmaceutical development and contemporary medicine. In vitro assays constitute a rapid method for evaluating the influence of particular chemical compounds on cell lines. The most widely recognised method for assessing the impact of specific chemical compounds on specific cell types is the MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay. The reduction of the tetrazolium structure in the MTT dye results in the formation of a coloured formazan that can be detected by spectrophotometry.
Cytotoxic properties of the studied compounds were assessed on non-cancer as well as cancer cell lines. Cytotoxicity was established by measurement of 50% inhibition of cell growth by MTT assay and expressed as CC50 parameter (50% cytotoxic concentration) [32]. All results are gathered in Table 2.
Table 2.
The results of cytotoxicity (CC50) obtained for investigated compounds in concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 1000 µM.
No. | Compound | Non-cancer cells CC50 [uM] |
Cancer cells CC50 [uM] |
||||||
MRC5 | Vero | LLCMK2 | NCTC clone 929 | HepG2 | A549 | HeLa | T98G | ||
| |||||||||
1 | 9a | >1000 | 965.04 ± 123.59 |
>1000 | >1000 | >1000 | >1000 | 6.35 ± 1.75 |
>1000 |
2 | 9h | >1000 | 418.71 ± 71.83 |
>1000 | >1000 | >1000 | >1000 | 2.11 ± 0.53 |
936.01 ± 127.99 |
3 | 9i | 389.401 ± 26.62 | 951.17 ± 78.25 |
>1000 | >1000 | >1000 | >1000 | 74.12 ± 15.20 |
>1000 |
4 | 9j | >1000 | 156.63 ± 15.82 |
989.12 ± 24.33 | 213.22 ± 59.01 | >1000 | >1000 | 71.86 ± 2.66 |
976.27 ± 47.46 |
5 | 10h | >1000 | >1000 | >1000 | >1000 | >1000 | >1000 | 46.20 ± 8.88 |
>1000 |
6 | 10i | >1000 | 42.53 ± 4.92 |
67.06 ± 8.03 |
284.61 ± 58.96 |
>1000 | >1000 | 9.26 ± 3.14 |
>1000 |
7 | 10l | >1000 | 474.97 ± 73.80 |
645.69 ± 29.81 |
>1000 | >1000 | >1000 | 215.31 ± 27.51 |
>1000 |
8 | 10o | 997.518 ± 117.91 |
48.02 ± 8.30 |
90.01 ± 6.90 |
6.85 ± 1.34 |
>1000 | >1000 | 35.68 ± 4.33 |
387.92 ± 70.59 |
9 | 10q | >1000 | 172.99 ± 20.92 |
317.76 ± 31.27 |
>1000 | >1000 | >1000 | 47.48 ± 5.68 |
>1000 |
In general, the tested compounds did not demonstrate high levels of toxicity towards the investigated non-cancer cell lines. Among them, Vero cells showed the highest sensitivity, however, it should be noted that the observed CC50 values can be described as medium. The exception is compound 10o, which was highly toxic towards NCTC clone 929 (CC50 = 6.85 ± 1.34 µM). The MRC-5 line exhibited the lowest level of sensitivity.
The cancer cell lines HepG2, A549 and T98G were found to be insensitive to the investigated compounds (CC50 > 1000 µM for HepG2, A549 and CC50 > 300 µM for T98G), whereas HeLa cells demonstrated increased sensitivity. The most active compounds 9a, 9h and 10i, revealed their toxicity with CC50 < 10 µM (6.35 ± 1.75 µM; 2.11 ± 0.53 µM and 9.26 ± 3.14 µM, respectively). In the same cell line, the remaining compounds demonstrated cytotoxic activity in the range of 35.68‒74.12 µM (10o, 10h, 10q, 9j, and 9i), while the least active compound 10l showed a level of toxicity an order of magnitude lower (CC50 = 215.31 ± 27.51 µM). The results obtained in this study demonstrate that the compounds exhibit selective activity towards HeLa cells.
Conclusion
The presented study showed that the sterically crowded thioketones 7c,d smoothly undergo the anticipated [3 + 2]-cycloaddition with diazomethane and 1,3,4-thiadiazolines 2c and 2d, respectively, were formed with complete regioselectivity in high yields. Upon heating to 65 °C in toluene solution, in analogy to the well-known compounds 2a and 2b, they extruded N2 and the in situ-generated reactive thiocarbonyl S-methanides 1c and 1d, in absence of any trapping reagent, underwent 1,3-dipolar electrocyclization yielding the corresponding, bulky substituted, thiiranes 8a and 8b. However, generation of thiocarbonyl S-methanides 1 in the presence of enolizable 1-substituted 5-mercapto-1H-tetrazoles 4 led to their efficient trapping and depending on the structure of 1 and the substituent located at N-1 in tetrazole 4, either thioaminals 9 or dithioacetals 10 were observed as products of the N- or S-insertion reaction, respectively. However, in some cases, formation of mixtures of products 9 and 10 were obtained and these results can be explained by ambident reactivity of the enolizable mercapto heterocycles 4. Notably, in some instances, depending on the substitution pattern, thermodynamically less stable thioaminals 9 underwent thermal isomerization in CDCl3 solution yielding the corresponding dithioacetals 10. Comparison of the results obtained with dispiro-substituted thiocarbonyl S-methanides 4c (less hindered) and 4d (more hindered) suggests that the steric hindrance can play an important role in the trapping process.
It is worth of emphasizing that thioaminals [33] and dithioacetals [34] constitute important groups of building blocks, which are of interest not only for pharmaceutically oriented studies [35] but also for polymer chemistry [36] and the crop protection industry [37] as well. Therefore, in extension of a typically synthetic work, a preliminary study on biological activity of the hitherto unreported 1H-tetrazole derivatives such as thioaminals 9 and dithioacetals 10 was carried out and it demonstrated that some of them act as potent cytotoxic agents against certain cancer cells.
In addition, the newly synthesized, sterically crowded 1,3,4-thiadiazolines 2c,d can be considered as attractive precursors of the corresponding bulky substituted thiiranes 8 and ethylenes derived from the corresponding cyclobutanones, which are easily accessible via desulfurization reaction of the thiiranes described in the present study (via the Barton–Kellogg reaction [38–39]). This type of ethylenic compounds is of interest, e.g., for structural, coordination and materials chemistry, as well [39–43]. Moreover, the presented study opens new perspectives for the development of studies focused on the exploration of sterically over-crowded thiocarbonyl S-methanides 1c,d in 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions with a plethora of various dipolarophiles (C=C, C≡C, C=N, C=O, C=S, N=N, etc.).
Experimental
General information
Commercial chemicals and solvents were used as received. If not stated otherwise, products were purified by filtration through short silica gel plugs (200–400 mesh) by using freshly distilled solvents as eluents or by recrystallization. Melting points were determined in capillaries with an Aldrich Melt-Temp II and they are uncorrected. NMR spectra were taken with a Bruker AVIII spectrometer (1H NMR (600 MHz); 13C NMR (151 MHz); chemical shifts are relative to residual undeuterated solvent peaks (CDCl3: 1H NMR δ = 7.25, 13C NMR δ = 77.00). Elemental analyses were obtained with a Vario EL III (Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH) instrument.
Starting materials
Adamantanethione (7a) and 3-thioxo-2,2,4,4-tetramethylcyclobutanone (7b) as well as the corresponding spiro-1,3,4-thiadiazolines 2a and 2b derived therefrom were obtained following published procedures [6–10,17–18]. Two sterically crowded dispiro-thioketones 7c (12-thioxo-dispiro[4.1.4.1]dodecan-6-one) and 7d (14-thioxo-dispiro[5.1.5.1]tetradecan-7-one) were prepared according to published procedures [23,26]. 1-Substituted 5-mercapto-1H-tetrazoles 4a‒e were used as commercial reagents (4a, 4d) or they were synthetized following published procedures (for synthesis of 4b,c, and 4e, see ref. [15]). The solution of diazomethane (CH2N2) in pentane was prepared without distillation and determination of the concentration following a procedure described in an earlier publication [28].
Preparation of 2c as a new precursor of thiocarbonyl S-methanide 1c: To a magnetically stirred solution of the thioketone 7c (833.0 mg, 4 mmol) in 5 mL pentane, placed in a water/ice bath, dry solution of diazomethane in pentane was added dropwise until the red color of starting 7c vanished. The colorless solution was cooled down in a dry ice container, and after few hours of cooling a colorless solid was separated. The crystalline material was filtered off and dried in the air at rt.
10-Thia-7,8-diazatrispiro[4.0.46.0.411.15]hexadec-7-en-16-one (2c): Yield: 910.0 mg (91%); mp 53‒55 °C (dec.); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.32–1.39 (m, 2H), 1.39–1.48 (m, 2H), 1.53–1.60 (m, 2H), 1.60–1.71 (m, 4H) 1.89–2.01 (m, 4H), 2.08–2.15 (m, 2H), 5.77 (s, 2H, S–CH2–N); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 25.4, 25.6, 30.3, 36.2, 75.2, 82.9 (S–CH2–N), 114.9, 217.3 (C=O); Anal. calcd for C13H18N2OS (250.36): C, 62.36; H, 7.25; N, 11.19; S, 12.81; found: C, 62.36; H, 7.43; N, 10.97; S, 12.85.
Thermal decomposition of dispiro-1,3,4-thiadiazoline 2c: A magnetically stirred solution of 2c (125.0 mg, 0.5 mmol) in 1 mL THF was heated in an oil bath at 65 °C and the evolution of nitrogen gas was controlled with a nitrometer (gas burette) connected with the flask. After ca. 3 h evolution of nitrogen was complete (ca. 13 mL N2 was collected in the nitrometer). The solvent was evaporated in vacuo and the residue was examined by 1H NMR spectroscopy. A characteristic singlet of the S–CH2 fragment was found in the region of 2.62 ppm. The pure product 8a was isolated by preparative layer chromatography.
1-Thiatrispiro[2.0.44.1.410.03]tetradecan-9-one (8a): Yield: 68 mg (62%); colorless, viscous oil; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.42–1.72 (m, 10H), 1.79–1.86 (m, 2H), 1.90–1.97 (m, 2H), 2.01–2.08 (m, 2H) 2.62 (s, 2H, S–CH2–C); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 25.7, 26.1, 26.5 (S–CH2), 33.4, 37.2, 61.8, 70.1, 219.9 (C=O); Anal. calcd for C13H18OS (222.34): C, 70.22; H, 8.16; S, 14.42; found: C, 70.20; H, 8.22; S, 14.34.
Reactions of the in situ-generated thiocarbonyl S-methanides 1a‒d with 5-mercapto-1-methyl-1H-tetrazole (4a): A magnetically stirred solution of 0.50 mmol (58 mg) 4a and 0.55 mmol of the corresponding precursor 2a–d (see Table 1) in 1 mL of THF was heated at 45 °C (for 2a and 2b) or in 1 mL of toluene at 65 °C (for 2c and 2d). The evolution of nitrogen was controlled using a nitrometer (gas burette) connected with the reaction flask. In all cases the reaction was completed after ca. 3 h. After this time, the solvent was evaporated, and the residue was analyzed by 1H NMR. Depending on the composition of the crude product, this material was either separated by preparative layer chromatography on the plates coated with silica gel (CH2Cl2 as the mobile phase) (separation of 9h and 10h) or crystallized from hexane/CH2Cl2 mixture (9a and 10m) or from MeOH (10c). Analytically pure samples of products isolated after chromatography were prepared after recrystallization from hexane/CH2Cl2 mixture.
1-Methyl-4-[2-(methylthio)adamantan-2-yl]-1,4-dihydro-1H-tetrazole-5-thione (9a): Yield 97 mg (66%), colorless crystals; mp 107‒109 °C (hexane/CH2Cl2); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.62‒1.94 (m, 10H, Ad-skeleton), 1.86 (s, 3H, SMe), 2.37‒2.44 (m, 1H), 2.47‒2.54 (m, 1H), 2.98‒3.03 (m, 1H), 3.86 (s, 3H, NMe), 4.34‒4.38 (m, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 10.3 (SCH3), 26.3, 26.8, 31.6, 32.7, 33.0, 33.2, 33.5 (NCH3), 34.5, 37.8, 81.2 (N‒C‒S), 162.9 (C=S); Anal. calcd for C13H20N4S2 (296.45): C, 52.67; H, 6.80; N, 18.90; S, 21.63; found: C, 52.63; H, 6.92; N, 18.81; S, 21.74.
2,2,4,4-Tetramethyl-3-[(1-methyl-1H-tetrazol-5-yl)thio]-3-(methylthio)cyclobutan-1-one (10c): Yield 120 mg (84%); colorless crystals; mp 136‒138 °C (MeOH); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.50 (s, 6H, 2Me), 1.66 (s, 6H, 2Me), 2.06 (s, 3H, SMe), 4.03 (s, 3H, NMe); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 15.8 (SCH3). 20.8 (2Me), 23.9 (2Me), 33.9 (NCH3), 68.6, 74.8 (S‒C‒S), 151.3 (N=C−S), 216.8 (C=O); Anal. calcd for C11H18N4OS2 (286.42): C, 46.13; H, 6.33; N, 19.56; S, 22.39; found: C, 46.29; H, 6.33; N, 19.62; S, 22.36.
12-(4-Methyl-5-thioxo-4,5-dihydro-1H-tetrazol-1-yl)-12-(methylthio)dispiro-[4.1.47.15]dodecan-6-one (9h): Isolated as the less polar fraction by PLC (SiO2, CH2Cl2). Yield: 61 mg (36%); colorless crystals; mp 127‒129 °C (hexane/CH2Cl2); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.67‒1.76 (m, 4H), 1.80 (s, 3H, SMe), 1.85‒1.96 (m, 6H), 2.05‒2.14 (br.m, 2H), 2.27‒2.35 (br.m, 2H), 2.43‒2.58 (br.m, 2H), 3.90 (s, 3H, NMe); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 13.6 (SCH3), 26.1, 26.5, 31.6 (br), 34.8, 35.6 (br), 74.7 (S‒C‒S), 164.5 (C=S), 215.2 (C=O); Anal. calcd for C15H22N4OS2 (338.49): C, 53.22; H, 6.55; N, 16.55; S, 18.94; found: C, 53.19; H, 6.29; N, 16.63; S, 18.94.
12-[(1-Methyl-1H-tetrazol-5-yl)thio]-12-(methylthio)dispiro[4.1.47.15]dodecan-6-one (10h): Isolated as the more polar fraction by PLC (SiO2, CH2Cl2): Yield: 80 mg (47%); colorless crystals; mp 109‒111 °C (hexane/CH2Cl2); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.71‒1.83 (m, 8H), 1.96‒2.03 (m, 2H), 2.05‒2.12 (m, 2H), 2.07 (s, 3H, SMe), 2.22‒2.34 (m, 4H), 4.03 (s, 3H, NMe); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 15.4 (SCH3), 25.4, 25.8, 32.7, 34.0, 35.7, 72.1, 78.2 (S−C−S), 151.0 (N=C−S), 216.6 (C=O); Anal. calcd for C15H22N4OS2 (338.49): C, 53.22; H, 6.55; N, 16.55; S, 18.94; found: C, 53.22; H, 6.41; N, 16.65; S, 19.05.
14-[(1-Methyl-1H-tetrazol-5-yl)thio]-14-(methylthio)dispiro[5.1.58.16]tetradecan-7-one (10m): Yield 85 mg (46%); colorless crystals; mp 191‒193 °C (hexane/CH2Cl2); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.13‒1.23 (m, 2H), 1.64‒1.73 (m, 10H), 1.74‒1.83 (m, 2H), 1.95‒2.04 (m, 2H), 2.02 (s, 3H, SMe), 2.34‒2.42 (m, 4H), 4.02 (s, 3H, NMe); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 15.3 (SCH3), 23.5, 23.6, 25.3, 31.1, 33.9, 34.0 (6 signals for 10CH2), 70.8 (2Cq), 75.9 (S‒C‒S), 151.3 (N=C‒S), 215.7 (C=O); Anal calcd for C17H26N4OS2 (366.54): C, 55.70; H, 7.15; N, 15.28; S, 17.50; found: C, 55.55; H, 7.04; N, 15.15; S, 17.68.
Supporting Information
CCDC-2420216 and CCDC-2420217 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures.
General information and experimental data of all isolated products, procedure for determination of biological activity, details of the crystal structure determination, and copies of 1H and 13C NMR spectra for all products.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Prof. Zbigniew J. Witczak (Wilkes University) for stimulating discussions in the course of preparation of the manuscript.
This work is dedicated to Prof. Wolfgang Weigand (Jena, Germany) on the occasion of his retirement.
Funding Statement
Financial support by the University of Łódź within the IDUB grant (2023-2024) is acknowledged (G.M.). The authors (A. O. and M. D.-B.) thank the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education for financial support within the project POL-OPENSCREEN, the decision no. 2024 / WK /06.
Data Availability
The data that supports the findings of this study is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
- 1.Huisgen R. Angew Chem, Int Ed Engl. 1963;2:565–598. doi: 10.1002/anie.196305651. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Padwa A, Pearson W H, editors. Synthetic Applications of 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition Chemistry Toward Heterocycles and Natural Products. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons; 2022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Qarelli P, editor. Modern Applications of Cycloaddition Chemistry. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Breugst M, Reissig H-U. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2020;59:12293–12307. doi: 10.1002/anie.202003115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kellogg R M. Tetrahedron. 1976;32:2165–2184. doi: 10.1016/0040-4020(76)85131-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mlostoń G, Heimgartner H. Pol J Chem. 2000;74:1503–1533. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jaiswal V, Mondal B, Saha J. Asian J Org Chem. 2020;9(10):1466–1477. doi: 10.1002/ajoc.202000238. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lakeev S N, Maydanova I O, Galin F Z, Tolstikov G A. Russ Chem Rev. 2001;70(8):655–672. doi: 10.1070/rc2001v070n08abeh000645. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Haut F-L, Habiger C, Speck K, Wurst K, Mayer P, Korber J N, Müller T, Magauer T. J Am Chem Soc. 2019;141(34):13352–13357. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b07729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mlostoń G, Huisgen R, Polborn K. Tetrahedron. 1999;55(38):11475–11494. doi: 10.1016/s0040-4020(99)00664-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Huisgen R, Mlostoń G, Giera H, Langhals E. Tetrahedron. 2002;58:507–519. doi: 10.1016/s0040-4020(01)01147-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mlostoń G, Gendek T, Linden A, Heimgartner H. Helv Chim Acta. 1999;82(2):290–296. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2675(19990210)82:2<290::aid-hlca290>3.0.co;2-p. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mlostoń G, Gendek T, Heimgartner H. Pol J Chem. 1998;72:66–72. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mlostoń G, Janicka E, Woznicka M, Linden A, Heimgartner H. Pol J Chem. 2003;77:1805–1817. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mlostoń G, Celeda M, Kowalczyk M, Oliver G A, Werz D B. Eur J Org Chem. 2024;27:e202400831. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.202400831. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mlostoń G, Kowalczyk M, Celeda M, Oliver G A, Werz D B. Synlett. 2025;36(11):1548–1552. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1773524. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Vishwakarma R, Gadipelly C, Mannepalli L K. ChemistrySelect. 2022;7:e202200706. doi: 10.1002/slct.202200706. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Neochoritis C G, Zhao T, Dömling A. Chem Rev. 2019;119:1970–2042. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dhiman N, Kaur K, Jaitak V. Bioorg Med Chem. 2020;28:115599. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2020.115599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Myznikov L V, Hrabálek A, Koldobskii G I. Chem Heterocycl Compd. 2007;43:1–9. doi: 10.1007/s10593-007-0001-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dileep K, Katiki M R, Rao B R, Vardhan V P S V, Sistla R, Nanubolu B, Murty M S R. Org Commun. 2017;10(3):178–189. doi: 10.25135/acg.oc.20.17.04.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Krapcho A P, Silvon M P, Goldberg I, Jahngen E G E., Jr J Org Chem. 1974;39:860–861. doi: 10.1021/jo00920a033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Diebert C E. J Org Chem. 1970;35:1501–1505. doi: 10.1021/jo00830a053. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Huisgen R, Mlostoń G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985;26:1049–1052. doi: 10.1016/s0040-4039(00)98509-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Huisgen R, Mlostoń G. Pol J Chem. 1999;73:635–644. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kimura K, Fukuda Y, Negoro T, Odaira Y. Bull Chem Soc Jpn. 1981;54:1901–1902. doi: 10.1246/bcsj.54.1901. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Muthuramu K, Sundari B, Ramamurthy V. J Org Chem. 1983;48:4482–4487. doi: 10.1021/jo00172a008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Huisgen R, Penelle J, Mlostoń G, Padias A B, Hall H K., Jr J Am Chem Soc. 1992;114:266–274. doi: 10.1021/ja00027a035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Han S Y, Lee J W, Kim H-J, Kim Y-J, Lee S W, Gyoung Y S. Bull Korean Chem Soc. 2012;33:55–59. doi: 10.5012/bkcs.2012.33.1.55. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Jiménez-Sandoval O, Cea-Olivares R, Hernández-Ortega S, Silaghi-Dumitrescu I. Heteroat Chem. 1997;8:351–359. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-1071(1997)8:4<351::aid-hc11>3.0.co;2-q. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhao J, Xu D, Zhang K, Cheng X. J Mol Struct: THEOCHEM. 2009;909:9–12. doi: 10.1016/j.theochem.2009.05.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Białek-Pietras M, Olejniczak A B, Paradowska E, Studzińska M, Jabłońska A, Leśnikowski Z J. J Organomet Chem. 2018;865:166–172. doi: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2018.03.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Cavaca L A S, Gomes R F A, Afonso C A M. Molecules. 2022;27(5):1673. doi: 10.3390/molecules27051673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Li H, Yang T, Riisager A, Saravanamurugan S, Yang S. ChemCatChem. 2017;9(6):1097–1104. doi: 10.1002/cctc.201601687. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wang Y, Zhang J, He F, Gan X, Song B, Hu D. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2019;29(16):2218–2223. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2019.06.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hernandez J J, Sama G R, Hu Y, Soars S, Niemet C E, Sanchez C M, Bowman C N. Adv Funct Mater. 2024;34:2306462. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202306462. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Jeanmart S, Gagnepain J, Maity P, Lamberth C, Cederbaum F, Rajan R, Jacob O, Blum M, Bieri S. Bioorg Med Chem. 2018;26(8):2009–2016. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2018.02.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sun J, Sun Y, Gu Y-C, Lin J-H, Xiao J-C. JACS Au. 2025;5:1039–1050. doi: 10.1021/jacsau.4c01270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Linden A, Egli D H, Heimgartner H. Acta Crystallogr, Sect C: Struct Chem. 2025;81(4):238–245. doi: 10.1107/s2053229625002074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lenoir D, Wattenbach C, Liebman J F. Struct Chem. 2006;17:419–422. doi: 10.1007/s11224-006-9061-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bernhard S, Belser P. Synth Commun. 1996;26:3559–3563. doi: 10.1080/00397919608003765. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Freund W, Hünig S. Helv Chim Acta. 1987;70:929–941. doi: 10.1002/hlca.19870700404. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Freund W, Hünig S. J Org Chem. 1987;52:2154–2161. doi: 10.1021/jo00387a007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
General information and experimental data of all isolated products, procedure for determination of biological activity, details of the crystal structure determination, and copies of 1H and 13C NMR spectra for all products.
Data Availability Statement
The data that supports the findings of this study is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.