Abstract
BACKGROUND: Local implementation strategies are often required to promote consistent adherence to clinical guidelines, but they are time consuming and expensive. The authors tested an educational intervention designed to increase use of the Ottawa Ankle Rules, a widely publicized set of clinical guidelines previously shown to reduce the use of radiography for diagnosis of acute ankle injuries. METHODS: The study consisted of a quasi-experimental, before-and-after comparative analysis. Trained experts provided 1-hour educational sessions and supplied resource materials on the Ottawa Ankle Rules to health care professionals from 63 Ontario hospitals. Participants were asked to evaluate the intervention. The authors then compared, for periods before and after the educational sessions, the use of ankle radiography for adults with acute ankle injury in 10 hospitals that received the educational intervention and reported no (n = 5) or some (n = 5) prior use of the rules and in 5 control hospitals, which declined the educational intervention because they were already implementing the rules. RESULTS: Although participants gave highly positive appraisals of the Ottawa Ankle Rules and the educational sessions, there was no reduction in the use of ankle radiography for the 10 hospitals that received the educational sessions (73% before and 78% after the intervention, p = 0.11). In contrast, use of radiography decreased significantly, from 75% to 65%, in the 5 control hospitals (p = 0.022). INTERPRETATION: Even when a dissemination strategy is well received and involves a widely accepted clinical guideline, the impact on behaviour in clinical practice may be small. In addition to broad dissemination, an active local implementation strategy is necessary to encourage physicians to adopt clinical guidelines.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (107.2 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Anderson G. Implementing practice guidelines. CMAJ. 1993 Mar 1;148(5):753–755. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anis A. H., Stiell I. G., Stewart D. G., Laupacis A. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the Ottawa Ankle Rules. Ann Emerg Med. 1995 Oct;26(4):422–428. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70108-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davis D. A., Taylor-Vaisey A. Translating guidelines into practice. A systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines. CMAJ. 1997 Aug 15;157(4):408–416. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davis D. A., Thomson M. A., Oxman A. D., Haynes R. B. Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA. 1995 Sep 6;274(9):700–705. doi: 10.1001/jama.274.9.700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davis D. A., Thomson M. A., Oxman A. D., Haynes R. B. Evidence for the effectiveness of CME. A review of 50 randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 1992 Sep 2;268(9):1111–1117. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grol R. Implementing guidelines in general practice care. Qual Health Care. 1992 Sep;1(3):184–191. doi: 10.1136/qshc.1.3.184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lomas J., Anderson G. M., Domnick-Pierre K., Vayda E., Enkin M. W., Hannah W. J. Do practice guidelines guide practice? The effect of a consensus statement on the practice of physicians. N Engl J Med. 1989 Nov 9;321(19):1306–1311. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198911093211906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lomas J. Words without action? The production, dissemination, and impact of consensus recommendations. Annu Rev Public Health. 1991;12:41–65. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.12.050191.000353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McBride K. L. Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules. Experience at a community hospital. Can Fam Physician. 1997 Mar;43:459–465. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pigman E. C., Klug R. K., Sanford S., Jolly B. T. Evaluation of the Ottawa clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle and midfoot injuries in the emergency department: an independent site assessment. Ann Emerg Med. 1994 Jul;24(1):41–45. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(94)70160-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stiell I. G., Greenberg G. H., McKnight R. D., Nair R. C., McDowell I., Reardon M., Stewart J. P., Maloney J. Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Refinement and prospective validation. JAMA. 1993 Mar 3;269(9):1127–1132. doi: 10.1001/jama.269.9.1127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stiell I. G., Greenberg G. H., McKnight R. D., Nair R. C., McDowell I., Worthington J. R. A study to develop clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Ann Emerg Med. 1992 Apr;21(4):384–390. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82656-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stiell I. G., McKnight R. D., Greenberg G. H., McDowell I., Nair R. C., Wells G. A., Johns C., Worthington J. R. Implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules. JAMA. 1994 Mar 16;271(11):827–832. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stiell I. Ottawa ankle rules. Can Fam Physician. 1996 Mar;42:478–480. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stiell I., Wells G., Laupacis A., Brison R., Verbeek R., Vandemheen K., Naylor C. D. Multicentre trial to introduce the Ottawa ankle rules for use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Multicentre Ankle Rule Study Group. BMJ. 1995 Sep 2;311(7005):594–597. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7005.594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sujitkumar P., Hadfield J. M., Yates D. W. Sprain or fracture? An analysis of 2000 ankle injuries. Arch Emerg Med. 1986 Jun;3(2):101–106. doi: 10.1136/emj.3.2.101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wise C. G., Billi J. E. A model for practice guideline adaptation and implementation: empowerment of the physician. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1995 Sep;21(9):465–476. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30173-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]