Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2025 Jul 28;20(7):e0329089. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329089

In vitro and in vivo characterization of wild type BMP9 and a non-osteogenic variant in models of pulmonary arterial hypertension

Tobias G Schips 1,*, Karl W Kavalkovich 1, Lai-ming Yung 1, Salam Ibrahim 1, Makhosi Edmondson 1, Zhigang Hong 1, Chin-hu Huang 1, Simon Hinke 1, Xinkang Wang 1, Andrea R Nawrocki 1, Annmarie Winkis 1, Jinquan Luo 1, Iman Farasat 1, Brian Geist 1, Yang Wang 1, Russell Bialecki 1, Jey R Jeyaseelan 1, David R Bauman 1
Editor: Laszlo Farkas2
PMCID: PMC12303310  PMID: 40720495

Abstract

Endothelial dysfunction and the resulting vascular remodeling are hallmarks of pulmonary hypertension, a debilitating disease of high arterial pressure in the lungs and the right side of the heart. Mutations in the BMPR2 signaling pathway are associated with the development of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Previous pre-clinical studies demonstrated that exogenous administration of recombinant human wild type BMP9 (WT BMP9) enhances BMPR2/ALK1 mediated signaling and reverses experimental pulmonary hypertension in rat models. However, BMP9 induces osteogenic activity in progenitor cells through activation of ActR2A and ActR2B receptor complexes potentially leading to unwanted bone formation in non-osteogenic tissues.

The cellular activity of human WT BMP9 and amino acid substitution variants was characterized in vitro in terms of BMPR2 and ActR2 signaling. We identified a mutant variant of human BMP9 that maintains its activity in endothelial cells, specifically preserving BMPR2 signaling while eliminating osteogenic signaling associated with ActR2A/B activation in mesenchymal precursor cells.

Rat models of pulmonary hypertension served as in vivo models to characterize efficacy and safety of BMP9 supplementation therapy. While WT BMP9 effectively activates BMPR2 signaling across species in rat, cynomolgus monkey and human systems, our human BMP9 mutant variant is inactive on rat BMPR2/ALK1 receptor complexes. Therefore, WT BMP9 was used to examine disease reversal in the preclinical monocrotaline model rat of pulmonary hypertension. WT BMP9 failed to improve right ventricular systolic pressure or right ventricular hypertrophy, despite clear target engagement shown by upregulation of SMAD7.

Telemetry studies of WT BMP9 in the Sugen 5416 and hypoxia rat model of pulmonary hypertension indicated no significant change in pulmonary pressure but led to increased systemic blood pressure and decreased heart rate. Additionally, escalating doses in naive rats caused severe dose-limiting effects and morbidity at 500 µg/kg/day or higher.

Given these findings including the absence of therapeutic efficacy in a relevant PAH animal model and dose limiting toxicity in rats, a therapeutic window for BMP9 treatment could not be established.

Introduction

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive and life-threatening disorder characterized by elevated blood pressure (BP) within the pulmonary arteries leading to right ventricular failure and death. The prevalence of PAH ranges from 0.4 to 1.4 per 100,000 persons [1]. Genetic and environmental factors play a role in the induction of endothelial dysfunction, vascular remodeling and inflammation, leading to vasoconstriction, neointima formation, medial hypertrophy and adventitial expansion. This vascular remodeling drives the increase in pulmonary vascular resistance, which ultimately leads to right ventricular hypertrophy (RVH) and right heart failure if left untreated. Current standard of care treatments focus on modulation of vascular hemodynamics through three main pathways: endothelin-, nitric oxide- and prostacyclin [2]. Despite significantly improving outcomes in PAH patients, current therapies, including combination therapies, are not curative and the disease has persistent high morbidity and mortality rates [3]. PAH remains a progressive disease. Two pathways have emerged as drivers of the progressive vascular remodeling observed in PAH: the platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) and the transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) superfamily. The PDGFR pathway is overactivated and inhibition with imatinib, a small molecule inhibitor targeting multiple tyrosine kinases, in the IMPRES trial resulted in improved exercise capacity and hemodynamics in PAH patients, but serious adverse events were common [4]. Upregulation of TGFβ signaling in the pulmonary vasculature leads to endothelial dysfunction, vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and increased deposition of extracellular matrix proteins [5], while downregulation of bone morphogenic protein (BMP) signaling, which generally exerts protective roles by inhibiting excessive cell growth and fostering vasodilation [6, 7]. Lung tissue samples from PAH patients and animal models of experimental PAH demonstrate increased expression of TGFβ family ligands, receptors and downstream mediators [5]. The experimental enhancement of TGFβ/Activin signaling in animal models exacerbates pulmonary vascular remodeling mimicking PAH pathology [8] and reduction of TGFβ signaling through genetic or pharmacological intervention was efficacious in reversing the vascular remodeling in PAH animal models [5, 9]. Recently, sotatercept, an activin ligand trap capable of reducing TGFβ/activin signaling, improved exercise capacity in PAH patients and was recently approved for the treatment of PAH [8].

BMP and TGFβ ligands are known for their promiscuous nature, as they can bind to and activate various TGFβ superfamily receptors, including different types of type 1- and type 2 receptors, as well as various co-receptors leading to a spectrum of signaling responses that influence cellular processes such as proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis [10]. The bone morphogenic protein receptor 2 (BMPR2) signaling pathway is a crucial regulator of pulmonary vascular homeostasis by regulating endothelial cell function and survival, vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and extracellular matrix remodeling [11]. Loss of BMPR2 signaling disrupts vascular homeostasis by inducing endothelial dysfunction and vascular smooth muscle proliferation, leading to increased vascular resistance and contributing to the development of PAH. Furthermore, the importance of BMPR2 in the pathological development of PAH is highlighted by genetic mutations in signaling components of the BMPR2 signaling pathway, which are prevalent in heritable PAH patients [6, 7]. Loss of function mutations in BMPR2, a receptor through which BMP9 and BMP10 modulate endothelial cell signaling [12], are the most commonly associated genetic mutations with the development of PAH [7]. Additionally, mutations within the BMPR2 pathway associated with PAH include the type I receptor, activin receptor-like kinase 1 (ALK1), type III receptor accessory protein (endoglin), small mother against decapentaplegic (SMAD) and BMP9 [13]. Pre-clinical work demonstrated that rescue of BMPR2 signaling or enhancement of endothelial BMPR2 activity with BMPR2 replacement or BMP9 supplementation halted and reversed PAH disease pathogenesis [14, 15]. BMP9 belongs to the TGFβ superfamily and acts selectively on vascular endothelial cells, inhibiting apoptosis, migration, and angiogenesis through activation of BMPR2 [16].

Activation of BMP9/BMPR2 downstream signaling is mediated through SMAD transcription factors (SMADs 1, 5, or 8). BMP9/BMPR2/ALK1 signaling is predominantly mediated through the transcriptional activity of SMAD1/5/8 in endothelial cells [14, 17, 12]. In addition to the normal function of endothelium protection which is mediated through BMP9/BMPR2/ALK1 complexes, BMP9 activates ALK1 receptor complexes with activin type 2 receptor (ActR2) A and ActR2B in osteogenic progenitor cell types to promote bone formation [18]. Systemic delivery of BMP9 to enhance or induce endothelial BMPR2 as a potential therapeutic strategy for vascular diseases like PAH could lead to unwanted bone formation. Thus, BMP9 mutant polypeptides that maintain endothelial cell signaling activity (BMPR2) but are devoid of osteogenic activity (i.e., ActR2A/ActR2B) would be required for the treatment of vascular diseases to minimize the chance of bone formation in non-osteogenic tissues.

We describe the discovery of mutant BMP9 dimers with preserved endothelial cell signaling activity through phosphorylation of SMAD1/5/8 (pSMAD) and reduced or eliminated osteogenic activity in normal human bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells in vitro. Furthermore, we demonstrated that targeting endothelial dysfunction by activation of BMPR2 with WT BMP9 was ineffective in reversing or preventing the development of PAH in rat models. Unexpectedly, significant adverse reactions were observed as a consequence of systemic administration of WT BMP9 in rats further limiting the therapeutic potential of BMP9 therapy.

Materials and methods

Human/Rat phospho-SMAD1/3 AlphaLISA

The AlphaLISA SureFire Ultra –pSMAD1 (Ser463/465; Revvity) and pSMAD3 (Ser423/425; Revvity) were used for evaluation of cell-based pSMAD1/3 activity alongside recombinant human BMP9 (R&D Systems, WT BMP9 reconstituted at 10 µg/mL in sterile 1x PBS + 4mM HCl + 0.1% BSA) as the positive control (final concentration: 10ng/mL) and vehicle (sterile 1x PBS + 4mM HCl + 0.1% BSA) as the negative control. HULEC-5a human lung endothelial cells (ATCC) or rat primary lung microvascular endothelial cells (Cell Biologics) were plated in a 96-well plate (Flat bottom, TC treated, Corning) at a density of 50,000 cells per well in 200uL growth medium (HULEC: MCDB131 Media (Gibco), + 10mM L-Glutamine (Gibco), 1% Pen Strep (Gibco) 1 µg/mL hydrocortisone (Stem Cell Technologies), 10ng/mL EGF (Sigma), 10% FBS (Gibco); or for rat cells: complete rat endothelial cell medium with kit, Cell Biologics). Cells were incubated overnight at 37°C in 5% CO2. Test compounds were diluted in 100uL medium per well (MCDB131 media + 0.1% BSA (bovine serum albumin fraction V (7.5% solution) Gibco). Culture medium was removed from the cells and 100uL stimuli-medium mix was added to each well and incubated for 1h at 37°C in 5% CO2. Cells were washed once with PBS and 50 µL lysis buffer was added to each well (AlphaLISA Lysis Buffer). Plates were sealed and incubated at with shaking for 10 min at room temperature (RT). Samples were homogenized by pipetting up and down (3 times) and cell lysates were transferred (10 µL of cell lysate) to 384-well plate (Revvity) for detection of AlphaLISA signal. 5uL acceptor mix (reaction buffer 1: 2.35 µL reaction buffer 2: 2.35 µL; activation buffer: 0.2 µL; acceptor beads: 0.1 µL) were added to each well. Plates were sealed and incubated at RT on a plate shaker (350 rpm) for 1h. With reduced lighting, 5uL donor mix (dilution buffer: 4.9uL; donor beads: 0.1 µL) were added to each well; plates were sealed with aluminum foil and incubated at RT overnight on a plate shaker (350 rpm). An alpha-enabled plate reader (Envision 2105 multilabel reader, Revvity) was used to measure raw fluorescent units (RFU) with Alpha technology settings. The background control value was calculated from the RFUs of wells with vehicle only. The EC50 for each agonist was calculated using nonlinear regression and is expressed as the nanomolar concentration of the compound.

In vitro gene expression assay

Human pulmonary artery endothelial cells, hPAEC (Cell Applications) were treated with WT BMP9 (R&D Systems) or BMP9-A347E at a single dose of 10nM for 24h. Following treatment, total RNA was isolated using QIAzol Lysis Reagent (Qiagen) and RNeasy Mini QIAcube Kit (Qiagen). The cDNA was prepared using SuperScript™ IV VILO™ Master Mix (Thermo). Gene expression was performed by RT-PCR using QuantStudio 12K Flex (Applied Biosystems) and Taqman probes (Hs01060665_g1 for ACTB, Hs04187239_m1 for ID2, Hs00932747_m1 for TGFBI, Hs00167155_m1 for PAI-1). The relative expression levels were determined by normalization to the expression of a housekeeping gene (ACTB) and calculation of ddCt values.

Human osteogenesis assay

Frozen normal Human Bone Marrow Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (hMSC; Lonza) were differentiated towards osteogenic linage. Cells were maintained in growth media (DMEM (Invitrogen), 10% HI FBS (Gibco), 1% P/S (Invitrogen) and differentiated using osteogenic media (MSC BM Basal media (Lonza), hMSC Osteogenic Bullet kit (Lonza) following the manufacturer instructions. Compound stimulation and induction of osteogenic differentiation were initiated and 48h later, cells were lysed using the Protein Quant Sample Lysis Kit (PLA; ABI). PLA lysates were used for cDNA generation using SuperScript™ IV VILO™ Master Mix (Thermo). Gene expression was performed by RT-PCR using QuantStudio 12K Flex (Applied Biosystems) and using TaqMan PCR primer probes for a relevant osteogenic marker SP7 (osterix; Hs01866874_s1), and housekeeper gene GAPDH (Hs9999905_m1). Reported outcome measurements were gene expression levels of gene targets normalized to housekeeper GAPDH expressed as Relative Fold Change (ddCt) to vehicle negative control.

Animal welfare statement

All studies were performed in compliance with the Animal Welfare Act regulations (Code of Federal Regulations, Title 9). All rodent studies were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Janssen Pharmaceutical R&D (Spring House, PA). Studies in cynomolgus non-human primates were conducted at Charles River Laboratories under the Testing Facilities IACUC and after approval by the Janssen Pharmaceutical Animal Care & Use Council (PACC).

Rat safety pharmacology study

This rat safety study was performed at Charles River Laboratories, planned as a 5-day exploratory toxicity study followed by a 2-week observation period. 30 female SD rats were dosed via continuous IV infusion via a femoral catheter. Animals were individually housed in solid bottom cages with certified bedding material. Individual housing was necessary due to the equipment used to facilitate tethered dose administration.

This study was performed in rats as the WT human BMP9 protein is cross reactive in rats. This study evaluated any potential toxicity associated with the target after saturating it (hence continuous infusion) at the three dose levels evaluated in this study. Previously this compound had been evaluated in pharmacology/efficacy studies up to a dose level of 30 μg/kg administered once daily subcutaneously over 21 days and was not associated with any adverse findings. This study helped in de-risking the target and identifying potential liabilities that maybe associated with BMP9 activation. The current state of scientific knowledge and the applicable guidelines cited did not provide acceptable alternatives, in vitro or otherwise, to the use of live animals to accomplish the purpose of this study.

All animals were observed at least twice a day for morbidity, mortality, injury, and availability of food and water. Veterinary care was available throughout the course of the study, and animals were examined by the veterinary staff as warranted by clinical signs or other changes. In the event that animals show signs of illness or distress, the responsible veterinarian may make initial recommendations about treatment of the animal(s) and/or alteration of study procedures, which must be approved by the Study Director. Animals were subject to Testing Facility SOP criteria and procedures for early euthanasia or when found dead. A veterinary consultation was not required if the samples were collected following anesthesia or euthanasia. Euthanasia was done by carbon dioxide inhalation followed by a Testing Facility SOP approved method to ensure death, e.g., exsanguination. If an animal is determined to be in overt pain/distress or appears moribund and is beyond the point where recovery appears reasonable, the animal will be euthanized for humane reasons in accordance with the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) Guidelines on

Euthanasia

Mortality was noted at 500 and 1500 μg/kg/day. For 500 mg/kg/day, 5 animals were euthanized in extremis on Day 4 while 4 animals were found dead on Day 3 or 4. For 1500 μg/kg/day, 2 animals were euthanized in extremis on Day 4 and 3 animals were found dead on Days 3 and/or 4. Therefore, dosing was discontinued on Day 4 for animals in all groups, including vehicle controls. Due to mortality and clinical observations indicative of overt toxicity, all surviving animals were necropsied on Day 4.

This study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Janssen Pharmaceutical R&D (Spring House, PA). All research staff involved in in vivo experiments received special training in animal care and handling.

Monocrotaline (MCT)-rat model and PAH phenotype assessment

Male Sprague-Dawley (SD) Rats (180-200g) were ordered from Charles River Laboratories. Rats were allowed to acclimate to the new environmental conditions of 12h light-dark cycle at 18–20°C and 40–50% humidity for one week prior to the study and maintained or regular rodent chow (5K75 LabDiet). Animals were randomized based on body weight and injected subcutaneously (SC) with 60 mg/kg MCT (Oakwood Chemical; in PBS, pH 7.4, prepared fresh) or vehicle. On the same day, MCT rats were randomized to receive daily treatment of vehicle (50mM sodium acetate, 5% dextrose and 0.1% rat serum albumin (RSA) at ~pH 5, SC, once daily), WT BMP9 (1, 3, 10, 30 µg/kg, SC, once daily) or Imatinib (methane sulfonate salt given at 100 mg/kg, orally, once daily) for 21 days. Rats were monitored under standard animal housing conditions for 3 weeks and body weight and health status was checked twice a week. On Day 21 after MCT administration, rats were anesthetized using isoflurane (5%) and transferred to the surgical table equipped with a 37°C heating pad and a nose cone to maintain an anesthetic plane at ~3% isoflurane. Eye ointment was applied prior to the surgery. Hemodynamic measurements were performed via a non-open chest procedure. Once the animal was fully anesthetized, the abdominal cavity was surgically opened, and the sternum was kept in place using a retractor. RV apex was stabilized with a 6.0 suture and anchored with tape onto the surgical platform. An apical stab was performed using a 25G 3/4“ needle. A Millar catheter was inserted gently into the stab. Right ventricular systolic (RVSP) and heart rate HR were recorded for 5–10 min to ensure stable tracing. At the end of the hemodynamic study, rats were euthanized, and the heart was dissected for RVH assessment. The weights of right ventricles were measured for Fulton index (weight ratio of right ventricular versus left ventricular plus septum). Heart weights were also normalized to body weight and compared across treatment groups.

Hemodynamic assessments in the Sugen SU5614/Hypoxia (Su/Hx) PAH rat model

Male SD rats (Charles River Laboratories) around 250 grams were implanted with dual telemetry devices 9HD-S21 (Data Science International) at Envigo and shipped to our institution after at least 10 days of recovery. Animals were single housed and allowed to acclimate for 1 week to standard room conditions and regular chow diet (5K75 LabDiet). After confirmation of the dual telemetry implantation by baseline BP recordings and analysis (Data Matrix 2.0, Ponemah P3; Data Science International), the telemetry-instrumented rats were injected SC with 20 mg/kg SU5614 (ApexBio) dissolved in DMSO and brought to 20 mg/ml in PBS) and placed in hypoxia chambers at 10% O2 for 3 weeks. Environment factors (O2, CO2, humidity and temperature) in the hypoxia cages, and the body weights and health status were recorded weekly. After 3 weeks of maintenance at in hypoxic conditions, rats were returned to normoxia for 2 weeks, allowing further development of the PAH phenotype before initiating compound treatment. Rats (n = 4/group) were injected with a single dose or repeat dose of vehicle (50mM sodium acetate, 5% dextrose and 0.1% RSA at ~pH 5) or WT BMP9 (3, 10, 30 and 100 µg/kg, SC)

To assess changes in systemic hemodynamics. The baseline systemic blood pressure (SBP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded over 6h prior to dosing and 24 or 48h after each dose in repeat dosing studies. Data was summarized as 60 min averages change vs baseline. Each animal was normalized to its own baseline first, then the data of the whole group for each treatment response was compared to its own vehicle.

Cynomolgus monkey (cyno) Pharmacokinetics (PK)/Pharmacodynamics (PD) study

This study was designed to use the fewest number of animals possible, consistent with the objective of the study, the scientific needs, and contemporary scientific standards. Although the beagle is the usual non-rodent model used for evaluating the toxicity of various test articles and for which there is a large historical database, the monkey was selected specifically for use in this study because the test agent is only reactive to NHP or humans (none of lower species), therefore, cyno has been selected. Environmental enrichment and enrichment foods were provided during the study (cognitive, social, edible, structural or manipulanda). This specific study proposal has been reviewed and approved by the NHP Study Committee at Janssen Pharmaceuticals.

Eighteen male, non-naïve cynomolgus non-human primates were randomly assigned to this PK/PD study performed by Charles River Laboratories. The animals weighed between approximately 2–6 kg. All monkeys were housed individually in stainless steel cages with environmental enrichment provided during the study. The animals were housed in a temperature and humidity-controlled room with 12h/12h light/dark schedule per day. Food and water were available ad libitum (Lab Diet Certified Primate Diet #5048; PMI Nutrition International) and provided to all animals twice daily. All animals were observed at least twice a day for morbidity, mortality, injury, and availability of food and water. Any animals in poor health were identified for further monitoring, treatment, and/or possible euthanasia. If an animal was determined to be in overt pain/distress or appears moribund and was beyond the point where recovery appeared reasonable, the animal was euthanized for humane reasons in accordance with the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) Guidelines on Euthanasia and with the procedures outlined in the protocol. Animals were dosed SC or intravenous (IV) with WT BMP9, BMP9 variant or vehicle (50:50 PEG400/ Hydroxypropyl-Beta-Cyclodextrin 5% in 10mM pH 7 phosphate buffer). Animals were euthanized under ketamine anesthesia and tissue samples were collected 6h post dose. The cranial and the right lobe of the lung were preserved in RNA later at 2–8°C and frozen the next day at −80°C.

In vivo gene expression analysis

The left rat lung or the cranial lobe of the left cyno lung (200−300 mg sample) were harvested, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C. While keeping tissues frozen on dry ice, a small (~3mm2) sample of lung tissue was excised from each total lung sample and placed in a pre-labeled Lysing matrix D tubes (MP-Bio) with 350uL RLT plus buffer (RNeasy Plus Mini kit; Qiagen) with β-mercaptoethanol. A FastPrep-24 5G instrument (MP Bio) was used to lyse and homogenize the tissue samples. The recommended program settings for lung tissue were used (Speed 6.0m/sec, Adapter Quickprep, Time 40 sec). Samples were transferred to Qiagen Qiashredder columns (Qiagen) and centrifuged in a benchtop microcentrifuge as per recommended settings (max speed for 2 min) to further homogenize samples. Supernatants were transferred to gDNA Eliminator mini-columns and continued through RNeasy Plus Mini kit RNA isolation steps (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA was eluted from spin columns with 50uL/tube of RNAase free H2O and quantified. RNA samples (2 µg) were used for transcription to cDNA using the Vilo Reverse-Transcription Protocol (SuperScript™ VILO™ MasterMix; Invitrogen) according to the manufacturers’ instructions.

Gene expression analysis was performed using TaqMan primer-probe combinations. The PCR reactions were carried out according to the manufacturers’ instructions in 384-Well Real-Time PCR Plates (Applied Biosystems), using 2X TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) in a ViiA7 PCR Machine (Applied Biosystems). Taqman probes (rat: GAPDH, Rn1775763_g1; PPIL2, Rn01404147_m1; BMPR2, Rn01437215_m1; HEY1, Rn00468865_m1; Smad7, Rn01523958_m1; PAI-1, Rn01481341_m1; CHRDL2, Rn01510694_m1; FN1, Rn00569575_m1; cyno: ACTB, Mf04354341_g1; Smad7, Mf00998193_m1) were used for PCR reactions. The relative expression levels were determined by normalization to the expression of a housekeeping gene (GAPDH/PPIL or ACTB) and calculation of ddCt values.

BMP9 production in Escherichia coli (E. coli)

Codon-optimized BMP9-A347E was cloned in topET30b vector and transformed in BL21 cells for production in E. coli. Inclusion bodies were isolated in lysis buffer (50mM Tris, 150mM NaCl, pH8.0) and lysed in a high-pressure homogenizer (ATS), followed by centrifugation and re-suspension in washing buffer (50mM Tris-HCl, 150mM NaCl, 10mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100). Inclusion bodies were collected and stored in storage buffer (50mM Tris, 150mM NaCl, pH 8.0). Inclusion bodies were denaturized (20mM Tris, 7M Gua-HCl, 10mM DTT, pH8.0) followed by refolding in (25mM Tris, pH8.3, 4% CHAPS, 2mM EDTA, 1M NaCl, 10% Glycerol) at 4°C for 9 days. Protein was purified via ion exchange column (HiTrap SP FF; Cytiva) followed by size exclusion purification via Superdex75 column (Cytiva). Protein purity was confirmed to be > 90% by SDS-PAGE and correct mass was confirmed by LC-MS and SEC-HPLC. Endotoxin levels were below 1EU/mg and proteins were stored in PBS, 4% Sucrose, 0.1mM EDTA at pH7.4.

Plasma and tissue PK measurements

Lung tissue samples (right rat- or cyno lungs) were cut into pieces and 50 mg of tissue was placed into lysing matrix D tubes (MPBio) and 500 µL of lysis buffer ((50mM Tris, 150mM NaCl, pH7.4) supplemented with Protease Inhibitor mini tablets; Pierce). Tubes were placed into a FastPrep-24 5G machine (MP Bio) and spun at speed-setting 4 for 30sec and repeated twice. Samples were centrifugated at 15000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C. Protein concentrations were measured using a BCA assay (Pierce) according to the manufacturer instructions. Individual lysate samples were diluted to 15 mg/mL.

To determine WT BMP9 concentrations in lung tissue lysate- and plasma samples, 96-well Streptavidin Gold Plates (MSD) were blocked with 150 µL/well of assay buffer (1x PBS (Gibco) + 1% BSA (Sigma) + 0.5% Tween-20 (Sigma)) and incubated for 30 min at RT with shaking at 650 rpm. Assay buffer was removed and 50 µL/well of capture reagent (Biotin-anti-hBMP9; R&D Systems – specific for human BMP9 allowing for differentiation of human, rat and cyno proteins) was added at 1ug/mL in assay buffer and incubated at RT for 45 min with shaking at 650 rpm. Plates were washed 3x with 300uL/well 1xPBS + 0.05% Tween-20 wash buffer. A WT BMP9 standard curve was prepared in 20% rat plasma (BioIVT) diluted in low cross buffer (Boca). Study samples were diluted (30 µL sample + 120 µL assay buffer). 50 µL/well standards and study samples were added to the MSD plates and incubated for 60 min at RT with shaking at 650 rpm. Plates were washed 3x with 300 µL/well 1x PBS + 0.05% Tween-20 wash buffer. 50 µL/well of detection reagent (0.25 µg/mL; Sulfo-Tag anti-human BMP9 (3209-Janssen)) was added and incubated at RT for 45 min with shaking at 650 rpm. Plates were washed 3x with 300 µL/well 1x PBS + 0.05% Tween-20 wash buffer. 150 µL/well of 1x read buffer (MSD) was added and plates were read on an MSD Sector Imager.

Statistical analysis

GraphPad Prism was used for statistical analyses. The data was presented as mean ± standard derivation. The difference between multiple groups was compared using One-way ANOVA or Two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test, respectively. A significance level of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Pharmacological characterization of WT BMP9 and A347E variant in vitro and in vivo

The crystal structure of the BMP9/ActR2B/ALK1 tertiary complex was compared to the BMPR2 structure and the conserved ligand binding domain was used to identify the core epitope that mediates critical contacts between BMP9/BMPR2 as compared to BMP9/ActR2B [19, 20].

An amino acid substitution screen was performed by introducing point mutations (each position mutated to all other 18 amino acids except Cysteine resulting in 518 mutant variants) in the BMPR2/ALK1 binding sites of BMP9, to identify variants with reduced osteogenic properties and preserved activation of SMAD1 in endothelial cells [20]. All experiments were performed using human BMP9 proteins (WT and A347E) and differential potencies in human and rat cellular systems were observed (Table 1).

Table 1. Summary of cell-based assay EC50 results for WT BMP9 and A347E variant.

Assay WT BMP9 [nM] A347E BMP9 [nM]
Human SP7 0.32 N/A
Human pSMAD1 3.7 5.7
Rat pSMAD1 204.3 N/A

The A347E variant of human BMP9 (henceforth: A347E variant) was identified as a lead molecule based on biochemical and biophysical properties [20]. To evaluate the osteogenic activity of WT BMP9 and the A347E variant in a human cell context, mesenchymal stem cells were differentiated towards osteogenic linage and SP7 transcription factor mRNA was measured as a marker of differentiation [21]. WT BMP9 potently activated SP7 transcripts, whereas the A347E variant did not show any activity in this assay (Fig 1A), confirming the loss of osteogenic potential in a relevant human cell-based system. Furthermore, an alkaline phosphatase activity assay confirmed the findings [20].

Fig 1. Pharmacological characterization of WT BMP9 and A347E variant in vitro and in vivo.

Fig 1

(A) WT BMP9 and A347E variant in cell-based human MSC assay measuring SP7 expression as a marker for osteogenic differentiation in a dose-response experiment (0.0195nM-10nM). (B) pSMAD1 activation in human endothelial cells in a dose-response experiment (0.000169nM-10nM). (C-E) Human primary pulmonary artery endothelial cells were treated with WT BMP9 and A347E variant at 10nM for 24h and gene expression was measured using Taqman PCR (C) ID2, (D) TGFBI, (E) PAI1. (F) pSMAD1 activation in primary rat endothelial cells in a dose-response experiment (0.000169nM-10nM). (G) WT BMP9 and A347E variant (30 µg/kg) were dosed SC to naïve rats (n = 4-5). Lung tissue was harvested 6h post dose and SMAD7 expression was evaluated in lung tissue as a PD marker by Taqman PCR. (H) WT BMP9 (30 µg/kg; IV) and A347E variant (1, 10, 30, 100 µg/kg; SC) was dosed to cynos (n = 3). Lung tissue was harvested 6h post dose and SMAD7 expression was evaluated in lung tissue as a PD marker by Taqman PCR.

The potency of A347E variant was compared to WT BMP9 in the HULEC-5a endothelial cell line for phosphorylation of SMAD1 and SMAD3 (Fig 1B and S1A Fig). WT BMP9 and A347E variant showed similar activities in both assays based on EC50 potency values, confirming preserved activation of the SMAD1- and 3 pathways in human endothelial cells. In addition, both WT BMP9 and A347E variant increased transcriptional activation of ID2, TGFΒI and PAI-1 in human primary pulmonary endothelial cells in vitro (Fig 1C-E), confirming functional activation of BMPR2 downstream transcriptional target genes.

In rat endothelial cells, WT BMP9 potently activated pSMAD1; howeverA347E variant was inactive in this assay (Fig 1F), suggesting preserved SMAD1 activity in human cellular systems but loss of potency in rodent endothelial cells (summarized in Table 1) and confirmed in vivo in rats. WT BMP9 (30 µg/kg) and A347E variant (30 µg/kg) were administered SC to rats and lung tissue was evaluated for BMPR2 pathway activation by measuring SMAD7 transcriptional changes 6 hours post dosing. WT BMP9 showed 2-fold transcriptional activation of SMAD7; however, the A347E variant was inactive in vivo (Fig 1G), confirming the lack of functional BMPR2 pathway activation in rats with A347E variant.

To further evaluate the functional activity of WT BMP9 and of A347E variant in vivo, we tested WT BMP9 in a cyno PK/PD study which revealed a WT BMP9 plasma half-life of ~1h and elevated levels of lung tissue exposure for up to 6h (S1B Fig). A dose response study using the A347E variant (1, 10, 30 and 100 µg/kg, SC) in normal cynos was performed and compared to cyno lung samples from a study dosed with a single dose of WT BMP9 (30 µg/kg, IV). Both proteins, WT BMP9 and A347E variant activated SMAD7, a downstream target of BMPR2 activation in cyno lungs at comparable doses confirming preserved SMAD activity in vivo (Fig 1H). WT BMP9 resulted in a 2-fold activation of SMAD7 with a single 30 µg/kg dose, whereas A347E variant showed a 2-fold upregulation of SMAD7 with a 100 µg/kg dose suggesting slight differences in the in vivo potency of WT BMP9 and A347E variant.

In vivo PK evaluation of WT BMP9 in naïve rats

Long et al. [14] reported efficacy of recombinant human BMP9 in multiple PAH rat animal models. We attempted to reproduce their data using WT BMP9 given that A347E variant is inactive in rats. The PK profile of WT BMP9 in rats following IV administration indicated a short half-life of only 4.5 min (Fig 2A), suggesting fast clearance of the protein from the circulation. The PK assay allowed for differentiation of human BMP9 from endogenous rat and cyno BMP9 proteins. Lung and kidney WT BMP9 concentrations were evaluated 1h post IV bolus administration showing a dose-dependent increase in WT BMP9 levels in the lung (0.2–0.8ng/mg). In contrast, WT BMP9 was detected in kidney at low levels (~0.1ng/mg) up to the 30 µg/kg WT BMP9 dose and levels increased significantly (~0.7ng/mg) at the 100 µg/kg WT BMP9 dose (Fig 2B). These results suggest that WT BMP9 could be retained in the lung for prolonged periods of time at low concentrations, while lung saturation may lead to a spill over into other tissues, e.g., kidney.

Fig 2. In vivo PK evaluation of WT BMP9 in naïve SD rats.

Fig 2

(A) WT BMP9 (100 µg/kg; IV) plasma PK evaluation in naïve rats (n = 4). (B) Rat lung and kidney tissue PK (n = 4) at the indicated dose levels via IV administration 1h after dose. (C) WT BMP9 (100 µg/kg) rat plasma PK after SC administration (20 min: n = 1; 60 min: n = 4). (D) Rat lung tissue PK time course of WT BMP9 (100 µg/kg) at the indicated timepoints after a single SC administration (n = 4). (E) Rat lung tissue PK (n = 4) at the indicated dose levels after a single SC administration or daily injections over a 5-day period (5x30µg/kg) 3h after the last dose. (F) Gene expression analysis by Taqman PCR of lung tissue from PK time course study (100 µg/kg; n = 4). (G) Gene expression analysis by Taqman PCR of lung tissue from PK dose response study with SC administration 3h after dose (n = 4).

To better understand the PK dynamics of WT BMP9, a time course was established with single dose injections. Post SC injection (100 µg/kg WT BMP9), the plasma concentrations of WT BMP9 remained comparable (0.6–0.8ng/mg) after 20- and 60-minutes post dose at low concentrations (Fig 2C) and undetectable at later timepoints. However, in rat lung tissue elevated WT BMP9 concentrations were detected for up to 6h after a single injection, with a peak in lung tissue concentration at 3h post-dosing (Fig 2D). A dose-dependent increase in lung tissue WT BMP9 concentrations was detected at 3h after dose (Fig 2E). The 30 µg/kg dose of WT BMP9 was evaluated in a single dose experiment as well as with 5 doses on consecutive days which showed the same tissue BMP9 concentrations (Fig 2E) indicating a lack of accumulation in the lung upon daily dosing.

Target engagement (TE) of WT BMP9 was tested in naïve rats by evaluating changes in SMAD7 gene expression by qPCR. The results showed time-dependent increases in SMAD7 mRNA levels peaking at 6h post-dose and normalizing at the 24h time point (Fig 2F). Dose-response experiments showed a peak in SMAD7 fold change over baseline with 30 and 100 µg/kg, whereas higher doses did not lead to further increases in SMAD7 expression (Fig 2G), indicating saturation of the response. Additional TE markers were evaluated as well, e.g., BMPR2, ID1 and Hey-1 gene expression, but fold changes were not significant or showed a variable response to WT BMP9 stimulation. This data is suggestive of a relationship whereby WT BMP9 levels correlated with SMAD7 transcriptional induction.

Evaluation of chronic in vivo efficacy in 21-day rat MCT model in prevention mode

The MCT rat model of PAH was used to evaluate the chronic efficacy of once daily WT BMP9 administration at multiple dose levels (3–100 µg/kg, SC) delivered in a disease prevention study initiating treatment at the same day as MCT dosing. The once daily dose of WT BMP9 was selected based on repeat dose experimental data confirming 24h coverage after 5 daily administrations ( Fig 4E). Imatinib (100 mg/kg, orally, once daily) was used as a positive control to reduce RVSP and RVH. Induction of PAH with MCT resulted in a reduction in body weight compared to saline-treated control rats. This effect normalized in imatinib-treated animals but not in any of the WT BMP9-treated groups (S2A Fig).

Fig 4. Hemodynamic effects of WT BMP9 in rats.

Fig 4

(A) Continuous hemodynamic measurement of SBP over 48h after a single SC dose of WT BMP9 (3-100 µg/kg) in Su/Hx rats (n = 6). (B) HR changes quantified at 6h timepoint post dose in Su/Hx rats (n = 6). (C) SBP changes after repeat dose experiments with 5 daily doses of WT BMP9 (100 µg/kg) in Su/Hx rats (n = 6). (D) HR measurements over 48h after a single SC dose of WT BMP9 (3-100 µg/kg) in Su/Hx rats (n = 6). (E) SBP changes quantified at 6h timepoint post-dose in Su/Hx rats (n = 6). (F) HR changes after repeat dose experiments with 5 daily doses of WT BMP9 (100 µg/kg) in Su/Hx rats (n = 6). (G) Daily body weight changes during 5-day repeat dose study with a single daily dose of WT BMP9 (30-500 µg/kg) via SC or IV routes in naïve rats (n = 5). Two-way ANOVA test with multiple comparison. Comparison vs. day 1: * p = 0.0363. (H) Gene expression analysis by Taqman PCR from lung tissue at day 5 post dose in naïve rats (n = 5).

Hemodynamic parameters were measured at 21 days post-MCT induction and no changes in HR were observed in any group (S2B Fig). Heart weight to body weight (HW/BW) ratio was significantly increased (p = 0.0001) in the MCT-only group compared to no-MCT control rats (S2C Fig), and a small, but significant reduction (p = 0.0153) in the 100 µg/kg BMP9 group was observed. The Fulton index (right ventricular weight/septum + left ventricular weights (RV/LV + S)) was significantly increased (p < 0.0001) in the MCT-treated animals confirming successful induction of a PAH like phenotype (Fig 3A). WT BMP9 treatment reduced the Fulton index at higher doses, however only the 30 µg/kg dose group effect was significant (p = 0.0315). A typically observed reduction (p < 0.0001) in RV/LV + S to near control levels was observed with Imatinib treatment (Fig 3A). The RVSP was increased (p < 0.0001) in MCT treated animals and significantly reduced (p = 0.0017) only in the Imatinib group (Fig 3B). High model variability contributes to the inconsistent dose-response with WT BMP9.

Fig 3. Evaluation of chronic in vivo efficacy in 21 days rat MCT model in prevention mode.

Fig 3

Rats were treated with MCT (60 mg/kg; n = 15; SC), or vehicle (control; n = 8; SC) followed by daily dosing of vehicle, WT BMP9 (3-100 µg/kg; n = 12; SC) or Imatinib (100 mg/kg; n = 12; PO) for 21 days. WT BMP9 was purchased from R&D systems or manufactured in-house in E. coli. (A) Fulton index (RV/LV + S) a measure of RVH 21 days post MCT injection. Comparison vs. control: ### p < 0.0001; vs MCT + Vehicle: * p = 0.0315; *** p < 0.0001. (B) Invasive measurements of RVSP 21 days post MCT injection. Comparison vs. control: ### p < 0.0001; vs MCT + Vehicle: ** p = 0.0017. (C) Fold change vs MCT vehicle in expression of various BMPR2 target genes by Taqman PCR from lung tissue of vehicle and WT BMP9 treated groups (Error represented as standard error of the mean).

Gene expression analysis of BMPR2-regulated transcripts revealed an upregulation of SMAD7 mRNA and other genes in all WT BMP9 dose groups with the maximum response at 100 µg/kg suggesting successful activation of the BMPR2/SMAD1/5/8 signaling pathway (Fig 3C). Although the rat MCT model performed as expected, as evident by the control and imatinib responses, there were no physiologically meaningful changes with WT BMP9 to improve the MCT PAH phenotype despite clear TE at 100 µg/kg with WT BMP9.

Safety pharmacology of WT BMP9 in rats

To evaluate whether higher doses of WT BMP9 are tolerated to test the efficacy of BMP9 at higher tissue concentrations we assessed the tolerability and safety of WT BMP9 in naïve SD rats using continuous intravenous infusions at 100, 500 or 1500 µg/kg/day for 5 days. The experiment was terminated on day 4 due to lethality observed in the two high-dose groups, where 80% of rats died prior to day 4 of dosing (S3A Fig).

To examine the cause of the observed toxicities in a relevant PAH disease background, SD rats were implanted with telemetry devices to continuously monitor hemodynamic parameters. Rats were then treated with Su/Hx to induce a PAH like phenotype. Unexpectedly, a significant dose-dependent increase in SBP (Fig 4A) and reduction in HR (Fig 4B) were observed after a single SC dose of WT BMP9. No dose responsive changes were observed on pulmonary hemodynamics as measure by systolic pulmonary arterial pressure, only the 100 µg/kg BMP9 dose group showed changes in pulmonary hemodynamics (S4A Fig). The changes on SBP and HR relative to baseline were observed at low doses ≥10 µg/kg and were long-lasting and normalized only after 48h-dose for the 100 µg/kg dose. Peak changes in SBP (Fig 4C) and in HR (Fig 4D) were observed at around 6h. To replicate these acute effects, repeat dosing on five consecutive days of 100 µg/kg BMP9 was conducted and confirmed the presence of increased SBP (Fig 4E) and reduced HR (Fig 4F) without showing any signs of tachyphylaxis.

A study comparing daily IV (≤300 µg/kg) and SC (≤500 µg/kg) bolus injections of BMP9 did not result in lethality, but a significant reduction in body weight over 4 days of dosing in the 300 µg/kg/day IV group (Fig 4G), suggestive of animals being in distress. A trend towards dose-dependent increases in BMPR2 downstream gene expression were observed in IV and SC dosing groups with increased levels of SMAD7 and BMPR2 gene expression (Fig 4H).

In conclusion, clear PK and TE results in pre-clinical animal models, in conjunction with rat toxicology data showing adverse safety findings of human WT BMP9 and the lack of efficacy in the standard MCT rat model, a therapeutic window for treatment of PAH could not be identified.

Discussion

In this study, we identified the A347E variant as a non-osteogenic version of BMP9 with preserved SMAD1/5/8 activity in human endothelial cells and lack of SP7 transcript upregulation (osteogenic marker) in human progenitor cells in vitro. BMPR2 signaling activity via pSMAD1 and pSMAD3 of the A347E variant was similar to WT BMP9 in human cells. Furthermore, in vivo activation of SMAD7 transcripts in lungs of cynos dosed with WT BMP9 and A347E variant showed similar activity for both proteins. However, pSMAD1 activity in rat endothelial cells in vitro and lung tissue in vivo was significantly reduced with the A347E variant, limiting the possibility of validating the activity of the variant in a chronic PAH rat disease model.

Characterization of WT BMP9 PK parameters revealed relatively short plasma half-life, and long-lasting BMP9 concentrations in both rat and cyno lung tissues, suggestive of the lung acting as a sink for BMP9. These effects were consistent with the increase in BMPR2 downstream gene expression changes in the lung, which were maximally induced after 6h and normalized at 24h, despite the lack of plasma WT BMP9.

In order to validate published beneficial effects of recombinant human BMP9 in PAH rat models [14], the in vivo efficacy of WT BMP9 was tested in the rat MCT model. The model demonstrated the expected PAH phenotype comparing no-MCT to MCT-treated animals, and imatinib (positive control) significantly reduced the Fulton index and RVSP compared to vehicle-treated rats as previously reported [22]. In contrast, no efficacy in PAH parameters was observed with WT BMP9 despite a sustained dose-dependent increase in BMPR2-SMAD1/5/8 regulated gene expression, indicating engagement of the BMPR2 signaling pathway. No overt adverse reactions were observed during this study. These results are in contrast to Long et al. [14], who reported the efficacy of BMP9 treatment in MCT and Su/Hx rats at relatively low concentrations.

In our hands, WT BMP9 did not affect pulmonary BP in PAH animals. However, acute administration of WT BMP9 resulted in a dose-dependent increase in SBP and a corresponding reduction in HR for up to 48h limiting the potential therapeutic use of BMP9. Additional investigational studies demonstrated that WT BMP9 directly reduced endothelial cell barrier function which is a likely mechanism for the hemodynamic effects and edema [23].

Genetic data from familiar PAH patients and expression data from the idiopathic PAH patient population provide substantial evidence of reduced BMPR2 signaling as a driver of pathological vascular remodeling in PAH [24].

Effects of BMPR2 signaling in endothelial cells are well described, with loss of BMPR2 in endothelial cells resulting in a slight increase of RVSP in hypoxia-induced PAH [25]. Furthermore, Diebold et al. reported that the hypoxia-induced development of persistent pulmonary hypertension after recovery at normoxia [26] was more overt in BMPR2 knockout mice compared to WT mice. Furthermore, loss of BMPR2 in vascular smooth muscle cells was described in mice with SMC-specific knockout of BMPR2, which resulted in limited PAH phenotype after hypoxia treatment but persistent pulmonary hypertension following recovery from hypoxia, suggestive of sustained muscularization of pulmonary arteries [27].

BMP9 acts as a regulator of angiogenesis by binding and activating BMPR2/ALK1 receptor complexes, mediating anti-proliferative signals and limiting endothelial cell migration [12, 28]. The beneficial effects of BMP9 ligand therapy were postulated due to pre-clinical models of PAH and in models of lung diseases associated with pulmonary fibrosis [9, 14]. In both cases, BMP9 supplementation limits the loss of vascular endothelium and reverses vascular remodeling. Findings of hypertension were observed with overexpression of BMP10 in endothelial cell. Overexpression of BMP10, a close relative to BMP9, resulted in an increase in BP via ALK1/SMAD1 stimulation. Vice versa, the loss of BMP9 and 10 in vascular smooth muscle cells resulted in vasodilation and loss of contractile VSMC phenotype [29].

Reports from the Bailly- and Guignabert laboratories add to a more complicated picture of BMP9 as a vascular quiescence factor, whereby they demonstrated that knockout of BMP9 or inhibition of BMP9 with neutralizing antibodies protected from PAH development in rodent models possibly due to reduced levels of Endothelin-1, a potent vasoconstrictor and contributor to vascular remodeling in PAH [30]. Recently, Desroches-Castan et al. described spontaneous arteriovenous shunts or arteriovenous malformation formations in BMP9 knockout animals, further supporting the role of BMP9 as a vascular senescence factor [31]. Mechanistically, higher VEGF/VEGFR signaling was observed in BMP9 deficient rats resulting in vasodilation, increased vessel volume in the lung, and reduced susceptibility to experimentally (chronic Hx, MCT, Su/Hx) induced PAH [8]. Similarly, in a chicken chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay, BMP9 administration resulted in a dose-dependent impairment of CAM angiogenesis [16], suggesting BMP9 is an angiogenesis inhibitor in vivo and acting as a quiescence factor for endothelial cells.

In summary, we could not verify the beneficial effects of BMP9 supplementation in the MCT disease model of PAH. Furthermore, BMP9 was associated with significant adverse effects on the endothelial barrier function, leading to fluid extravasation and systemic hypertension [23]. The exact molecular mechanism leading to these effects is unclear and requires further investigation. However, inhibiting BMP9 to limit its impact on pulmonary hypertension has shown beneficial effects in pre-clinical animal models of PAH [30] and Paul Yu’s lab recently described in an abstract that BMP9 contributes to experimental PH by regulating expression of EC-derived molecules modulating PASMC growth and phenotype [32]. These pre-clinical results are currently being evaluated in phase 1 clinical trials utilizing a BMP9 neutralizing antibody (NCT06137742). This approach could limit the promiscuity of BMP9 on other receptor complexes and thereby provide functional improvements for PAH patients.

In conclusion, the potential beneficial effects of BMP9 ligand therapy for treating PAH are likely limited and overshadowed by the potent adverse effects that we identified and further understanding of BMP9s’ mechanisms of action in regulating angiogenesis is required.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Pharmacological characterization of WT BMP9 and A347E variant in vitro and in vivo.

(A) pSMAD3 activation in human endothelial cells in a dose response experiment (0.000169nM-10nM). (B) WT BMP9 (100 µg/kg; IV) plasma- and lung tissue PK evaluation in naïve cynos (n = 3).

(TIF)

pone.0329089.s001.tif (98.6KB, tif)
S2 Fig. Evaluation of chronic in vivo efficacy in 21 days rat MCT model in prevention mode.

(A) Body weight analysis of vehicle, MCT, WT BMP9 and imatinib rat groups after MCT or vehicle (control) administration (n ≥ 15/group). (B) HR (n ≥ 15/group) and (C) heart weight to body weight (HW/BW) ratio of rats 21 days post MCT induction (n ≥ 15/group). Comparison vs. control: ### p < 0.0049; vs MCT + Vehicle: * p = 0.0183.

(TIF)

pone.0329089.s002.tif (161.7KB, tif)
S3 Fig. Characterization of safety pharmacology of WT BMP9 in rats.

(A) Kaplan-Meier survival curve of naïve rats (n = 5) with continuous IV infusion of WT BMP9 at the indicated dose levels.

(TIF)

pone.0329089.s003.tif (62.6KB, tif)
S4 Fig. Characterization of systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (sPAP) of WT BMP9 in rats.

(A) Continuous hemodynamic measurement of sPAP over 48h after a single SC dose of WT BMP9 (3–100 µg/kg) in Su/Hx rats (n = 6).

(TIF)

pone.0329089.s004.tif (78.9KB, tif)

Acknowledgments

We thank Mark Erion, Julien Haessler, Robert Davidson, Sanjeev Bhardvaj, Chao Han, and all other team members for their support of this work.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

All authors are or were employees of Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development: Janssen Research and Development LLC. This study was funded by Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development: Janssen Research and Development LLC. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Emmons-Bell S, Johnson C, Boon-Dooley A, Corris PA, Leary PJ, Rich S, et al. Prevalence, incidence, and survival of pulmonary arterial hypertension: A systematic review for the global burden of disease 2020 study. Pulm Circ. 2022;12(1):e12020. doi: 10.1002/pul2.12020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ghofrani H-A, Gomberg-Maitland M, Zhao L, Grimminger F. Mechanisms and treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2025;22(2):105–20. doi: 10.1038/s41569-024-01064-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ghofrani H-A, Humbert M. The role of combination therapy in managing pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir Rev. 2014;23(134):469–75. doi: 10.1183/09059180.00007314 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hoeper MM, Barst RJ, Bourge RC, Feldman J, Frost AE, Galié N, et al. Imatinib mesylate as add-on therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension: results of the randomized IMPRES study. Circulation. 2013;127(10):1128–38. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000765 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yung L-M, Yang P, Joshi S, Augur ZM, Kim SSJ, Bocobo GA, et al. ACTRIIA-Fc rebalances activin/GDF versus BMP signaling in pulmonary hypertension. Sci Transl Med. 2020;12(543):eaaz5660. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaz5660 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Deng Z, Morse JH, Slager SL, Cuervo N, Moore KJ, Venetos G, et al. Familial primary pulmonary hypertension (gene PPH1) is caused by mutations in the bone morphogenetic protein receptor-II gene. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;67(3):737–44. doi: 10.1086/303059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Thomson JR, Machado RD, Pauciulo MW, Morgan NV, Humbert M, Elliott GC, et al. Sporadic primary pulmonary hypertension is associated with germline mutations of the gene encoding BMPR-II, a receptor member of the TGF-beta family. J Med Genet. 2000;37(10):741–5. doi: 10.1136/jmg.37.10.741 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bone morphogenetic protein-9 controls pulmonary vascular growth and remodeling. medRxiv. 2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ryanto GRT, Musthafa A, Hara T, Emoto N. Inactivating the Uninhibited: The Tale of Activins and Inhibins in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(4):3332. doi: 10.3390/ijms24043332 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hiepen C, Mendez P-L, Knaus P. It Takes Two to Tango: Endothelial TGFβ/BMP Signaling Crosstalk with Mechanobiology. Cells. 2020;9(9):1965. doi: 10.3390/cells9091965 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Li W, Quigley K. Bone morphogenetic protein signalling in pulmonary arterial hypertension: revisiting the BMPRII connection. Biochem Soc Trans. 2024;52(3):1515–28. doi: 10.1042/BST20231547 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.David L, Mallet C, Mazerbourg S, Feige J-J, Bailly S. Identification of BMP9 and BMP10 as functional activators of the orphan activin receptor-like kinase 1 (ALK1) in endothelial cells. Blood. 2007;109(5):1953–61. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-07-034124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Orriols M, Gomez-Puerto MC, Ten Dijke P. BMP type II receptor as a therapeutic target in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2017;74(16):2979–95. doi: 10.1007/s00018-017-2510-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Long L, Ormiston ML, Yang X, Southwood M, Gräf S, Machado RD, et al. Selective enhancement of endothelial BMPR-II with BMP9 reverses pulmonary arterial hypertension. Nat Med. 2015;21(7):777–85. doi: 10.1038/nm.3877 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.McMurtry MS, Moudgil R, Hashimoto K, Bonnet S, Michelakis ED, Archer SL. Overexpression of human bone morphogenetic protein receptor 2 does not ameliorate monocrotaline pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2007;292(4):L872-8. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00309.2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.David L, Mallet C, Keramidas M, Lamandé N, Gasc J-M, Dupuis-Girod S, et al. Bone morphogenetic protein-9 is a circulating vascular quiescence factor. Circ Res. 2008;102(8):914–22. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.165530 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Han C, Hong K-H, Kim YH, Kim M-J, Song C, Kim MJ, et al. SMAD1 deficiency in either endothelial or smooth muscle cells can predispose mice to pulmonary hypertension. Hypertension. 2013;61(5):1044–52. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.199158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wu N, Zhao Y, Yin Y, Zhang Y, Luo J. Identification and analysis of type II TGF-β receptors in BMP-9-induced osteogenic differentiation of C3H10T1/2 mesenchymal stem cells. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 2010;42(10):699–708. doi: 10.1093/abbs/gmq075 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Salmon RM, Guo J, Wood JH, Tong Z, Beech JS, Lawera A, et al. Molecular basis of ALK1-mediated signalling by BMP9/BMP10 and their prodomain-bound forms. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):1621. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15425-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Luo J, Kavalkovich K, Schips T, Winkis A, Haesler J, Jeyaseelan J. BMP9 variant polypeptides and uses thereof. 2023.
  • 21.Wang Y, Xia C, Chen Y, Jiang T, Hu Y, Gao Y. Resveratrol Synergistically Promotes BMP9-Induced Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Stem Cells Int. 2022;2022:8124085. doi: 10.1155/2022/8124085 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Schermuly RT, Dony E, Ghofrani HA, Pullamsetti S, Savai R, Roth M, et al. Reversal of experimental pulmonary hypertension by PDGF inhibition. J Clin Invest. 2005;115(10):2811–21. doi: 10.1172/JCI24838 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kanerva J, Lu S, Carreira V, Chaudhuri S, Wang Y, Bialecki R. Mechanistic investigation of the vascular toxicity associated with BMP9 treatment. The Toxicologist, a Supplement to Toxicological Sciences. 2024;2024. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Dannewitz Prosseda S, Ali MK, Spiekerkoetter E. Novel Advances in Modifying BMPR2 Signaling in PAH. Genes (Basel). 2020;12(1):8. doi: 10.3390/genes12010008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Spiekerkoetter E, Tian X, Cai J, Hopper RK, Sudheendra D, Li CG, et al. FK506 activates BMPR2, rescues endothelial dysfunction, and reverses pulmonary hypertension. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(8):3600–13. doi: 10.1172/JCI65592 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Diebold I, Hennigs JK, Miyagawa K, Li CG, Nickel NP, Kaschwich M, et al. BMPR2 preserves mitochondrial function and DNA during reoxygenation to promote endothelial cell survival and reverse pulmonary hypertension. Cell Metab. 2015;21(4):596–608. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.03.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wang L, Moonen J-R, Cao A, Isobe S, Li CG, Tojais NF, et al. Dysregulated Smooth Muscle Cell BMPR2-ARRB2 Axis Causes Pulmonary Hypertension. Circ Res. 2023;132(5):545–64. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.320541 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Scharpfenecker M, van Dinther M, Liu Z, van Bezooijen RL, Zhao Q, Pukac L, et al. BMP-9 signals via ALK1 and inhibits bFGF-induced endothelial cell proliferation and VEGF-stimulated angiogenesis. J Cell Sci. 2007;120(Pt 6):964–72. doi: 10.1242/jcs.002949 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wang L, Rice M, Swist S, Kubin T, Wu F, Wang S, et al. BMP9 and BMP10 act directly on vascular smooth muscle cells for generation and maintenance of the contractile state. Circulation. 2021;143(14):1394–410. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.047375 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tu L, Desroches-Castan A, Mallet C, Guyon L, Cumont A, Phan C, et al. Selective BMP-9 Inhibition Partially Protects Against Experimental Pulmonary Hypertension. Circ Res. 2019;124(6):846–55. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.313356 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Desroches-Castan A, Koca D, Liu H, Roelants C, Resmini L, Ricard N, et al. BMP9 is a key player in endothelial identity and its loss is sufficient to induce arteriovenous malformations. Cardiovasc Res. 2024;120(7):782–95. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvae052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhong Y, Troncone L, Convington T, Yang PB, Worst LR, Rajesh S, et al. Abstract 18578: BMP9 regulates endothelial expression of mediators of pulmonary vascular remodeling. Circulation. 2023;148(Suppl_1). doi: 10.1161/circ.148.suppl_1.18578 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Laszlo Farkas

Dear Dr. Schips,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

In particular, you are asked to respond to the concerns regarding the results with wildtype vs. mutated BMP9, the title and the organization of the manuscript.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jun 29 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Laszlo Farkas, MD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

1. When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.-->--> -->-->Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at -->-->https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and -->-->https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf-->--> -->-->2. Please update your submission to use the PLOS LaTeX template. The template and more information on our requirements for LaTeX submissions can be found at http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/latex.-->--> -->-->3. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: -->-->All authors are or were employees of Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development: Janssen Research and Development LLC.-->-->This study was funded by Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development: Janssen Research and Development LLC-->-->  -->-->Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript." -->-->If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed. -->-->Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.-->--> -->-->4. Thank you for stating the following in the Competing Interests section: -->-->All authors are or were employees of Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development: Janssen Research and Development LLC.-->-->This study was funded by Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development: Janssen Research and Development LLC-->--> -->-->We note that one or more of the authors are employed by a commercial company. -->--> -->-->a. Please provide an amended Funding Statement declaring this commercial affiliation, as well as a statement regarding the Role of Funders in your study. If the funding organization did not play a role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript and only provided financial support in the form of authors' salaries and/or research materials, please review your statements relating to the author contributions, and ensure you have specifically and accurately indicated the role(s) that these authors had in your study. You can update author roles in the Author Contributions section of the online submission form.-->--> -->-->Please also include the following statement within your amended Funding Statement. -->-->“The funder provided support in the form of salaries for authors, but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.”-->-->If your commercial affiliation did play a role in your study, please state and explain this role within your updated Funding Statement. -->--> -->-->b. Please also provide an updated Competing Interests Statement declaring this commercial affiliation along with any other relevant declarations relating to employment, consultancy, patents, products in development, or marketed products, etc.  -->--> -->-->Within your Competing Interests Statement, please confirm that this commercial affiliation does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to  PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests) . If this adherence statement is not accurate and  there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared.-->--> -->-->Please include both an updated Funding Statement and Competing Interests Statement in your cover letter. We will change the online submission form on your behalf.-->--> -->-->5. We note that you have included the phrase “data not shown” in your manuscript. Unfortunately, this does not meet our data sharing requirements. PLOS does not permit references to inaccessible data. We require that authors provide all relevant data within the paper, Supporting Information files, or in an acceptable, public repository. Please add a citation to support this phrase or upload the data that corresponds with these findings to a stable repository (such as Figshare or Dryad) and provide and URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers that may be used to access these data. Or, if the data are not a core part of the research being presented in your study, we ask that you remove the phrase that refers to these data.-->--> -->-->6. Please amend either the abstract on the online submission form (via Edit Submission) or the abstract in the manuscript so that they are identical.-->?>

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1:  Schips et al. studied the characterization of wild type BMP9 and a non-osteogenic variant as a potential therapeutic for pulmonary arterial hypertension. Authors concluded that the potential beneficial effects of BMP9 ligand therapy are likely limited. The findings from this study would contribute to elucidate the pathogenesis of PAH and develop the treatment for PAH. This study is interested; however, some concerns are included.

1. Authors might change the appropriate title to the results from this study.

2. Why did the WT BMP9 used this study fail to improve the PH although previous study recombinant human WT BMP9 reversed experimental PH?

3. Did authors examine the mechanism of increase BP by WT BMP9?

Reviewer #2:  Interesting paper

Some issues

the abstract is confusing. It should be reworded as a classical clinical abstract with intro, methods and results with a division betwenn in invo and in vitro results (usually a bit difficult for clinical reader)

Introduction should be shortened to 2 pages

Methods parts is well written, but maybe it is too long. probably a part may be put in an appendix

results:legends of figures should not be embedded

results: p values should be added

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes:  Fabrizio D'Ascenzo

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org . Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2025 Jul 28;20(7):e0329089. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329089.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 1


23 Jun 2025

Journal Requirements:

1. When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

The revised manuscript has been updated following the PlOS One requirements.

2. Please update your submission to use the PLOS LaTeX template.

The revised manuscript has been updated following the PloS LaTeX requirements.

3. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

The new cover letter to the revised manuscript has been updated according to the instructions of the financial disclosure section

4. Thank you for stating the following in the Competing Interests section:

The new cover letter to the revised manuscript has been updated according to the instructions of the Competing Interests section

5. We note that you have included the phrase “data not shown” in your manuscript.

The revised manuscript does not contain the phrase “data not shown”. Three sections have been updated and references to the source data have been included. In addition new S4 Fig was added to provide source data for the lack of consistent changes in pulmonary hemodynamics with BMP9 treatment.

P21 L313

The A347E variant of human BMP9 (henceforth: A347E variant) was identified as a lead molecule based on biochemical and biophysical properties[21].

Added reference #21 and removed data not shown

P25 L409 (track changes); P24 L408 (clean)

The once daily dose of WT BMP9 was selected based on repeat dose experimental data confirming 24h coverage after 5 daily administrations (Fig 4 E).

Added reference to Fig 4E and removed data not shown

P27 L455 (track changes); P26 L454 (clean)

No dose responsive changes were observed on pulmonary hemodynamics as measure by systolic pulmonary arterial pressure, only the 100µg/kg BMP9 dose group showed changes in pulmonary hemodynamics (S4A Fig).

Added new S4A Fig to the manuscript and reference to S4A Fig and removed data not shown

6. Please amend either the abstract on the online submission form (via Edit Submission) or the abstract in the manuscript so that they are identical.

We updated the abstract in the manuscript and the online submission form, but on our end, both were already identical.

Comments to the Author

Reviewer #1: Schips et al. studied the characterization of wild type BMP9 and a non-osteogenic variant as a potential therapeutic for pulmonary arterial hypertension. Authors concluded that the potential beneficial effects of BMP9 ligand therapy are likely limited. The findings from this study would contribute to elucidate the pathogenesis of PAH and develop the treatment for PAH. This study is interested; however, some concerns are included.

1. Authors might change the appropriate title to the results from this study.

We appreciate the reviewer's suggestion to revise the manuscript title. The new title, "In vitro and in vivo Characterization of Wild Type BMP9 and a Non-Osteogenic Variant in Models of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension," emphasizes the characterization of BMP9 and excludes its therapeutic potential in PAH.

2. Why did the WT BMP9 used this study fail to improve the PH although previous study recombinant human WT BMP9 reversed experimental PH?

We appreciate the reviewer's question regarding our inability to reproduce previously published results demonstrating that WT BMP9 could reverse experimental PAH. The reasons for the conflicting findings on the effects of WT BMP9 in rat PAH models remain unclear. Our team explored several options to identify the root cause of the lack of efficacy observed.

We evaluated a commercial version of WT BMP9 from R&D Systems and an internally produced WT BMP9 protein from E. coli. Both proteins displayed indistinguishable activity in vitro, specifically in pSMAD1 activation in human endothelial cells. Various formulations (PBS with or without serum albumin) were tested for solubilizing the proteins, but no differences in WT BMP9 activity were noted. Additionally, we conducted multiple in vivo studies to assess the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of WT BMP9 in rats and established a PK/PD relationship by examining its effects on upregulating transcriptional targets such as SMAD7 (Fig 2).

In long-term efficacy studies using the MCT rat model of PAH, we observed activation of downstream transcriptional mediators (Fig 3C), but no consistent improvements in pulmonary function. The MCT model worked as expected in the vehicle control group (significant increases in RVSP and Fulton index) as well as the positive control group receiving PDGFR inhibitor Imatinib (significant decreases in RVSP and Fulton index). This outcome was repeated at least three times with similar results. Furthermore, we assessed treatment paradigms reported by Long et al. (2016, Nature Medicine) in the Sugen/Hypoxia rat model of PAH, yet found no efficacy of WT BMP9 in ameliorating PAH pathology. Long et al. reported using 600 ng/day BMP9 via intraperitoneal injections (~0.15 μg/kg). We tested various injection routes and found the subcutaneous route to be the most reliable and efficacious for dosing WT BMP9 in rodents. In our hands, the minimum effective dose that consistently activated the BMPR2 pathway was 3 μg/kg, approximately 20 times higher than the dose used by Long et al. Since no study evaluating BMP9 in models of PAH has evaluated pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of BMP9 proteins in rats, it is difficult to directly compare different studies.

In summary, our evaluation of WT BMP9's effects failed to reproduce its therapeutic benefits in rat PAH models. Toxicology study results suggest that WT BMP9 treatment induces an immediate increase in systemic blood pressure, which may interfere with measurements of pulmonary hemodynamic improvements.

Furthermore, published literature from Tu et al. (Circ Res 2019 Mar 15;124(6):846-855; doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.313356; Selective BMP-9 Inhibition Partially Protects Against Experimental Pulmonary Hypertension) suggests a more complex role for BMP9 in the development of PAH than shown in the study of Long et al. (Nat Med 21, 777–785 (2015). doi: 10.1038/nm.3877; Selective enhancement of endothelial BMPR-II with BMP9 reverses pulmonary arterial hypertension).

In addition, Yong et al. (Circulation 2023 Nov 6;Vol 148, Suppl_1; doi: 10.1161/circ.148.suppl_1.18578; Abstract 18578: BMP9 Regulates Endothelial Expression of Mediators of Pulmonary Vascular Remodeling) presented an abstract suggesting that recombinant BMP9, BMP9/BMP10 trap ALK1-Fc, and BMP9 neutralizing antibody can prevent or reverse experimental PH when administered before or after onset of experimental PH. However, recombinant disulfide-linked BMP9 was not protective in SUGEN/Hypoxia (SU-Hx)- or monocrotaline (MCT)-induced experimental PH, suggesting dissociated monomers might function as competitive BMP9 antagonists. These statements provide further evidence that BMP9 supplementation therapy might not be a beneficial treatment option for patients suffering from PAH.

We included the Yong et al. citation in the revised discussion which now provides further evidence and explanation for our study results.

3. Did authors examine the mechanism of increase BP by WT BMP9?

We appreciate the reviewer's question regarding how WT BMP9 raises blood pressure in rats. Our studies identified vascular leakage in major organs as the root cause, leading to distress in low-dose groups and lethality in high-dose groups. These findings were presented at a conference (Kanerva, 2024), and we are preparing an additional manuscript for publication.

Reviewer #2: Interesting paper

Some issues

1. the abstract is confusing. It should be reworded as a classical clinical abstract with intro, methods and results with a division betwenn in invo and in vitro results (usually a bit difficult for clinical reader)

We appreciate the reviewer's suggestion to change the abstract format for better clarity. We have revised it to separate the introduction, methods, and results, further dividing the results into in vitro and in vivo findings.

2. Introduction should be shortened to 2 pages

We acknowledge the reviewer's request to shorten the introduction. Due to the extensive published information on this topic, it is challenging to condense the introduction to two pages. After consulting with the Editor, we have decided that the introduction adequately reviews the topic and will remain in its current form.

3. Methods parts is well written, but maybe it is too long. probably a part may be put in an appendix

We appreciate the reviewer's request to change the format of the method section. After consulting with the Editor, it has been decided that the method section provides a comprehensive summary of the methods used and will remain in its current form.

4. results:legends of figures should not be embedded

We thank the reviewer for the request to change the format of the result section. PLOS formatting requirements involve the figure legends to be embedded in the manuscript text after first mention in the corresponding section and after consulting with the Editor we decided to keep the current format of the figure legends.

5. results: p values should be added

We appreciate the reviewer's request to add p-values. The p-values were presented in the figure legends, and we agree that including them in the results section text would enhance the assessment of the results. Therefore, we have added p-values to the results section.

P24 L414/415:

The heart weight to body weight (HW/BW) ratio was significantly increased (p=0.0001) in the MCT-only group compared to no-MCT control rats (S2C Fig). Additionally, a small but significant reduction (p=0.0153) was observed in the 100µg/kg BMP9 group.

P25 L417/420/421/422:

The Fulton index (right ventricular weight/septum + left ventricular weights (RV/LV+S)) was significantly increased (p<0.0001) in the MCT-treated animals, confirming the successful induction of a PAH-like phenotype (Fig 3A). WT BMP9 treatment reduced the Fulton index at higher doses; however, only the effect of the 30µg/kg dose group was significant (p=0.0315). A typical reduction (p<0.0001) to near control levels was observed with Imatinib treatment (Fig 3A). The RVSP was increased (p<0.0001) in MCT-treated animals and significantly reduced (p=0.0017) only in the Imatinib group (Fig 3B).

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.pdf

pone.0329089.s005.pdf (244.6KB, pdf)

Decision Letter 1

Laszlo Farkas

In vitro and in vivo characterization of wild type BMP9 and a non-osteogenic variant in models of pulmonary arterial hypertension

PONE-D-25-06191R1

Dear Dr. Schips,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager®  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Laszlo Farkas, MD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: Authors changed the title and addressed the reviewer's comments. This study do not have concerns about reserach ethics or publication ethics.

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed and authors should be complimented for. No other comments and improvement is needed

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes:  Fabrizio D'Ascenzo

**********

Acceptance letter

Laszlo Farkas

PONE-D-25-06191R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Schips,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

You will receive further instructions from the production team, including instructions on how to review your proof when it is ready. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few days to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Laszlo Farkas

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Pharmacological characterization of WT BMP9 and A347E variant in vitro and in vivo.

    (A) pSMAD3 activation in human endothelial cells in a dose response experiment (0.000169nM-10nM). (B) WT BMP9 (100 µg/kg; IV) plasma- and lung tissue PK evaluation in naïve cynos (n = 3).

    (TIF)

    pone.0329089.s001.tif (98.6KB, tif)
    S2 Fig. Evaluation of chronic in vivo efficacy in 21 days rat MCT model in prevention mode.

    (A) Body weight analysis of vehicle, MCT, WT BMP9 and imatinib rat groups after MCT or vehicle (control) administration (n ≥ 15/group). (B) HR (n ≥ 15/group) and (C) heart weight to body weight (HW/BW) ratio of rats 21 days post MCT induction (n ≥ 15/group). Comparison vs. control: ### p < 0.0049; vs MCT + Vehicle: * p = 0.0183.

    (TIF)

    pone.0329089.s002.tif (161.7KB, tif)
    S3 Fig. Characterization of safety pharmacology of WT BMP9 in rats.

    (A) Kaplan-Meier survival curve of naïve rats (n = 5) with continuous IV infusion of WT BMP9 at the indicated dose levels.

    (TIF)

    pone.0329089.s003.tif (62.6KB, tif)
    S4 Fig. Characterization of systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (sPAP) of WT BMP9 in rats.

    (A) Continuous hemodynamic measurement of sPAP over 48h after a single SC dose of WT BMP9 (3–100 µg/kg) in Su/Hx rats (n = 6).

    (TIF)

    pone.0329089.s004.tif (78.9KB, tif)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.pdf

    pone.0329089.s005.pdf (244.6KB, pdf)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES