Skip to main content
Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research logoLink to Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research
. 2025 Jun 19;14(3):289–293. doi: 10.7774/cevr.2025.14.e29

Evaluation of the safety and immunogenicity of the ERAGS-GFP oral rabies vaccine in dogs

Dong-Kun Yang 1,, Ju-Yeon Lee 1, Minuk Kim 1, Hye Jeong Lee 1, Gyu-Nam Park 1, Yun Sang Cho 1
PMCID: PMC12303705  PMID: 40741056

Abstract

Rabies is a fatal zoonotic disease primarily transmitted through dog bites, making oral rabies vaccines critical for disease control. This study evaluated the immunogenicity of the ERAGS-GFP oral rabies vaccine strain in dogs. To optimize viral production, we examined cell density, multiplicity of infection (MOI), and freeze-thaw cycles. Safety was assessed via clinical monitoring, body temperature, and weight changes. Immunogenicity was evaluated using rabies virus neutralizing antibody (VNA) titers. Vero cells at MOI 2 with 3 freeze-thaw cycles yielded the highest viral titers. Vaccinated dogs showed no clinical symptoms and developed sustained protective VNA titers, demonstrating ERAGS-GFP’s efficacy in rabies control.

Keywords: Rabies, ERAGS-GFP, Immunogenicity, Safety, Dogs


Rabies remains one of the deadliest zoonotic diseases, posing a severe threat to global human and animal health. It is primarily transmitted through the bites of rabid dogs, which account for the majority of human cases. Recognizing the urgent need for rabies elimination, international organizations including the World Health Organization have set a goal to eradicate dog-mediated rabies by 2030 [1]. Countries worldwide have implemented national rabies eradication programs involving mass vaccination, early reporting, strengthened surveillance, and quarantine measures. Despite these efforts, rabies continues to cause approximately 59,000 deaths annually [2]. Achieving successful rabies eradication requires vaccinating over 70% of the canine population. However, a key challenge is capturing free-roaming dogs, especially in endemic regions [3]. Effective management of stray dogs is crucial for rabies control, and oral rabies vaccination (ORV) offers a promising solution by enabling immunization of difficult-to-capture populations [4].

ORV is a widely utilized preventive measure for rabies control, particularly in wild and free-roaming dogs. Upon ingestion, the vaccine virus infects the mucosal membranes and tonsils, inducing an immune response [5]. Early ORV strains (ERA, SAD Bern, and SAD B19) were attenuated through multiple passages, but exhibited residual pathogenicity, causing vaccine-associated rabies cases [6,7,8,9]. The second-generation strain, SAG-2, was developed through monoclonal antibody selection, demonstrating effective immunity in dogs and foxes [10]. Third-generation ORV strains, RABORAL V-RG® (Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, CT, USA) and ONRAB® (Artemis Technologies, Guelph, ON, Canada), utilize recombinant viral vectors and have successfully prevented rabies in wild populations [11,12]. The latest strain, SPBN GASGAS, was designed using reverse transcription for precise genetic modifications to enhance safety, preventing rabies in raccoons and foxes [13].

In the Republic of Korea (ROK), dog-mediated rabies has been eradicated since 1980 due to extensive vaccination programs. However, since 1993, rabid raccoon dogs have caused 179 cases in cattle, 177 in dogs, 76 in raccoons, 4 in cats, and one in deer [14]. To mitigate this risk, RABORAL V-RG® bait vaccines have been deployed in rabies-risk regions since 2002, maintaining a rabies-free status since 2014 [14]. Enhancing vaccination coverage in free-roaming dogs is vital to sustaining this status. ORVs have been proposed as an alternative to parenteral vaccination, following successful implementation in wild animal populations [8]. In a previous study, we developed the ERAGS-GFP strain through reverse transcription, introducing fluorescent protein expression while modifying pathogenic amino acids [15]. The strain demonstrated non-pathogenicity in mice following intracranial injection. This study aims to optimize viral production conditions for ERAGS-GFP and evaluate its safety and immunogenicity in dogs.

The ERAGS-GFP strain was deposited in the Korean Veterinary Culture Collection (KVCC-VR1900060) and propagated in Vero cells (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) for use as an ORV strain. The CVS-11 strain was propagated in BHK-21 cells (ATCC) for the rabies virus neutralizing antibody (VNA) test. Vero, Neuro-2a, and BHK-21 cells were utilized to determine optimal viral titers and were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium supplemented with 5%–10% fetal bovine serum. BHK-21, Neuro-2a, and Vero cells were seeded at a density of 200,000 cells/mL into 25 cm2 flasks and incubated for 24 hours. The ERAGS-GFP strain was inoculated at MOIs of 0.1, 1, 2, 4, and 10, and incubated for 5 days. To assess virus stability, infected Vero cells underwent 1, 2, or 3 freeze-thaw cycles before supernatant collection. Virus titers were measured using the Reed and Muench method. Infected cells were identified by fluorescence microscopy, and viral titers were determined at day 5 post-infection. The titer of ERAGS-GFP administered orally or subcutaneously was 108.0 TCID50/mL (Table 1). All procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUCs approval number: 2024-279). Fourteen dogs were divided into 3 experimental groups. Six dogs received oral ERAGS-GFP three times at 2-week intervals, 6 received a single subcutaneous injection, and 2 remained untreated as controls. Body temperature and weight were recorded at baseline and at 4, 8, and 10 weeks post-vaccination. Clinical signs were monitored daily for 10 weeks. Blood samples were collected at 0, 2, 4, 6, and 10 weeks post-administration to measure rabies antibody titers. Rabies VNA titers were determined using a fluorescent antibody virus neutralization assay, employing a reference serum with a titer of 0.5 IU/mL. Rabies antibodies were also quantified using a blocking enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (BioPro Rabies ELISA Ab Kit; BioPro, Praha, Czech Republic). Serum samples with percentage blocking (PB) <40% were considered negative, PB ≥40% were positive, and PB ≥70% indicated protective antibody levels. All values were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was conducted using GraphPad Prism Software version 5.0 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA). One-way analysis of variance followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test was performed to determine significance, with p<0.001, p<0.01, and p<0.05 considered statistically significant.

Table 1. Specific primer sets for rabies virus diagnosis.

Designation Oligonucleotide Expected size (bp) Target gene Remarks
JW12 ATGTAACACCY*CTACAATG 606 N
JW6UNI CAR*TTVGCRCACATYTTRTG

*Y, C or T; R, A or G.

Stable, high-titer production of the ERAGS-GFP strain is essential for supplying sufficient vaccine antigen. To identify optimal cell lines and MOI for ERAGS-GFP production, three cell types were infected with 5 different MOIs, and virus titers were measured. BHK-21, Neuro-2a, and Vero cells inoculated with the 5 MOIs yielded average viral titers of 108.0, 107.4, and 108.1 TCID50/mL, respectively (Fig. 1A). Consequently, Vero cells inoculated with an MOI of 2 were selected for ERAGS-GFP production. To release cell-associated rabies virus, the harvested virus was subjected to freeze-thaw cycles. The titers of the ERAGS-GFP strain after the freeze-thaw cycles were 107.8,7.8,8.0, and 108.3 TCID50/mL, respectively (Fig. 1B). Thus, three freeze-thaw cycles were determined to be optimal. The safety of the ERAGS-GFP strain administered orally or subcutaneously was monitored in dogs for 10 weeks. No clinical signs of rabies were observed in any dogs, including controls (Table 2). Body temperatures of orally and subcutaneously vaccinated dogs were measured for 7 days, with average values remaining below 40°C (Fig. 2A). The average body weight of vaccinated dogs increased up to 8 weeks and then stabilized until 10 weeks, whereas the control group’s weight continued to rise (Fig. 2B). Dogs administered the ERAGS-GFP strain orally developed mean rabies VNA titers of 0.58, 0.93, 1.71, and 1.87 IU/mL at 2, 4, 6, and 10 weeks post-administration, respectively. Those receiving a single subcutaneous injection showed mean rabies VNA titers of 0.17, 3.40, 5.77, and 5.39 IU/mL at the same intervals. Control dogs had a mean titer of 0.06 IU/mL at 10 weeks, indicating no rabies antibodies (Fig. 3A). The same serum samples used in the fluorescent antibody virus neutralization test were assessed in a blocking ELISA. Orally vaccinated dogs had mean PB of 61, 80, 83, and 82 at 2, 4, 6, and 10 weeks, respectively. Subcutaneously vaccinated dogs showed PBs of 60, 88, 92, and 93 at the same intervals. Control dogs had PBs ranging from 0 to 13 over 10 weeks (Fig. 3B).

Fig. 1. Comparative proliferation of ERAGS-GFP in cell lines and MOI condition. (A) Proliferation ability of the ERAGS-GFP strain in 3 cell types at different multiplicities of infection. Among the 3 cell lines, Vero cells inoculated at 2 MOI showed the highest viral titer of the ERAGS-GFP strain. (B) Viral titers of the ERAGS-GFP strain after different numbers of freeze-thaw cycles. The strain subjected to 3 freeze-thaw cycles achieved the highest viral titer.

Fig. 1

MOI, multiplicity of infection.

Table 2. Clinical signs in dogs administered the ERAGS-GFP strain over 10 weeks.

Animal species No. of animals Route/Titer* Clinical signs for 10 weeks
Neurologic Salivation Behavior Diarrhea Anorexia
Dogs 6 Oral/108.0 0/6 0/6 0/6 0/6 0/6
6 SC/108.0 0/6 0/6 0/6 0/6 0/6
2 No treatment 0/2 0/2 0/2 0/2 0/2

SC, subcutaneous injection.

*108.0 TCID50/mL.

Fig. 2. Changes in the average body temperature (A) and body weight (B) of dogs administered the ERAGS-GFP strain.

Fig. 2

SC, subcutaneous injection.

Fig. 3. Immunogenicity assessment of ERAGS-GFP strain using VNA test and ELISA. (A) Mean rabies VNA titers in dogs administered the ERAGS-GFP strain. At 2 weeks post-oral administration, the average VNA titer exceeded the protective level of 0.5 IU/mL. (B) PB on ELISA. PB 40 (dotted line) and 70 (solid line) indicate the thresholds for rabies antibody positivity and a protective antibody level, respectively. Statistical significance among groups was assessed by one-way analysis of variance.

Fig. 3

VNA, virus neutralizing antibody; PB, percentage blocking; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; SC, subcutaneous injection.

*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.

ORV is a practical strategy to enhance vaccination coverage among aggressive or difficult-to-capture dogs [16]. It is cost-effective and applicable to various animal species. However, ORV vaccine strains can be shed from a dog’s mouth post-administration, increasing potential exposure to immune tissues. The effectiveness of ORV largely depends on viral titers, with current bait vaccines such as SAG-2, V-RG, AdRG1.3, and SPBN GASGAS containing titers above 108.0 TCID50 per bait [3,11,12,13]. In this study, ERAGS-GFP inoculated in BHK-21 and Vero cells produced high viral titers exceeding 108.0 TCID50/mL, making them suitable for large-scale production. Among these cell lines, Vero cells demonstrated optimal productivity and stability at an MOI of 2, preventing early saturation effects seen at MOI 10. Although viral titers were comparable at MOIs of 2 and 10, slightly lower yield at 10 MOI suggests early infection saturation, limiting subsequent rounds of viral replication. The safety of ORV strains has been extensively demonstrated in various species, including dogs, foxes, and raccoon dogs. Regulatory authorities require vaccine manufacturers to provide comprehensive safety data before approval. Previous studies have confirmed the safety of SAG-2 in foxes and raccoon dogs, and AdRG1.3 was found safe in multiple species at high oral doses [17,18]. In this study, dogs administered ERAGS-GFP either orally or subcutaneously maintained body temperatures below 40°C for 7 days, with no clinical rabies symptoms observed over 10 weeks. Additionally, ERAGS-GFP was commercialized as a bait vaccine for raccoon dogs in the ROK in 2014, further supporting its safety profile.

Rabies VNA are crucial for evaluating immune responses post-vaccination. Previous research on SAG-2 and SPBN GASGAS showed sustained VNA levels in vaccinated dogs [19,20]. In this study, ERAGS-GFP vaccinated dogs exhibited VNA titers increasing from 0.58 IU/mL at 2 weeks to 1.87 IU/mL at 10 weeks. Blocking ELISA confirmed the presence of rabies antibodies, indicating successful immune induction. However, further studies are required to assess long-term immunogenicity and optimize bait vaccine formulations for dogs.

In conclusion, the ERAGS-GFP strain demonstrated high-titer production in Vero cells at MOI 2, ensuring stability and effective viral replication. It was found to be safe for dogs over a 10-week period and successfully induced rabies-specific immunity. These results highlight its potential as an effective ORV candidate for canine rabies control, though additional research is needed to refine vaccination strategies.

Footnotes

Funding: This study was supported financially by a grant (N-1549085-2017-36-01) from the Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA), Republic of Korea.

Conflict of Interest: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Author Contributions:
  • Conceptualization: Yang DK.
  • Data curation: Yang DK.
  • Formal analysis: Yang DK.
  • Funding acquisition: Cho YS, Yang DK.
  • Investigation: Yang DK.
  • Methodology: Kim M, Lee JY, Lee HJ, Park GN.
  • Project administration: Yang DK, Software.
  • Validation: Cho YS.
  • Visualization: Writing - original draft.
  • Writing - review & editing: Yang DK, Lee JY, Lee HJ, Cho YS.

References

  • 1.WHO Rabies Modelling Consortium. Zero human deaths from dog-mediated rabies by 2030: perspectives from quantitative and mathematical modelling. Gates Open Res. 2020;3:1564. doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13074.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hampson K, Coudeville L, Lembo T, Sambo M, Kieffer A, Attlan M, et al. Estimating the global burden of endemic canine rabies. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9:e0003709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shen T, Welburn SC, Sun L, Yang GJ. Progress towards dog-mediated rabies elimination in PR China: a scoping review. Infect Dis Poverty. 2023;12:30. doi: 10.1186/s40249-023-01082-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Taylor LH, Wallace RM, Balaram D, et al. The role of dog population management in rabies elimination-A review of current approaches and future opportunities. Front Vet Sci. 2017;4:109. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rupprecht CE, Abela-Ridder B, Abila R, et al. Towards rabies elimination in the Asia-Pacific region: from theory to practice. Biologicals. 2020;64:83–95. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2020.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vos A, Neubert A, Aylan O, et al. An update on safety studies of SAD B19 rabies virus vaccine in target and non-target species. Epidemiol Infect. 1999;123:165–175. doi: 10.1017/s0950268899002666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bingham J, Foggin CM, Gerber H, et al. Pathogenicity of SAD rabies vaccine given orally in chacma baboons (Papio ursinus) Vet Rec. 1992;131:55–56. doi: 10.1136/vr.131.3.55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fehlner-Gardiner C, Nadin-Davis S, Armstrong J, Muldoon F, Bachmann P, Wandeler A. Era vaccine-derived cases of rabies in wildlife and domestic animals in Ontario, Canada, 1989-2004. J Wildl Dis. 2008;44:71–85. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-44.1.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hostnik P, Picard-Meyer E, Rihtarič D, Toplak I, Cliquet F. Vaccine-induced rabies in a red fox (Vulpes vulpes): isolation of vaccine virus in brain tissue and salivary glands. J Wildl Dis. 2014;50:397–401. doi: 10.7589/2013-07-183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mähl P, Cliquet F, Guiot AL, et al. Twenty year experience of the oral rabies vaccine SAG2 in wildlife: a global review. Vet Res. 2014;45:77. doi: 10.1186/s13567-014-0077-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Maki J, Guiot AL, Aubert M, et al. Oral vaccination of wildlife using a vaccinia-rabies-glycoprotein recombinant virus vaccine (RABORAL V-RG®): a global review. Vet Res. 2017;48:57. doi: 10.1186/s13567-017-0459-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Brown LJ, Rosatte RC, Fehlner-Gardiner C, et al. Oral vaccination and protection of striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis) against rabies using ONRAB®. Vaccine. 2014;32:3675–3679. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.04.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bobe K, Ortmann S, Kaiser C, et al. Efficacy of oral rabies vaccine baits containing SPBN GASGAS in domestic dogs according to international standards. Vaccines (Basel) 2023;11:307. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11020307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yang DK, Kim HH, Lee KK, Yoo JY, Seomun H, Cho IS. Mass vaccination has led to the elimination of rabies since 2014 in South Korea. Clin Exp Vaccine Res. 2017;6:111–119. doi: 10.7774/cevr.2017.6.2.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yang DK, Kim HH, Park YR, et al. Generation of a recombinant rabies virus expressing green fluorescent protein for a virus neutralization antibody assay. J Vet Sci. 2021;22:e56. doi: 10.4142/jvs.2021.22.e56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Smith TG, Millien M, Vos A, et al. Evaluation of immune responses in dogs to oral rabies vaccine under field conditions. Vaccine. 2019;37:4743–4749. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.09.096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Follmann EH, Ritter DG, Baer GM. Evaluation of the safety of two attenuated oral rabies vaccines, SAG1 and SAG2, in six Arctic mammals. Vaccine. 1996;14:270–273. doi: 10.1016/0264-410x(95)00208-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shen CF, Lanthier S, Jacob D, et al. Process optimization and scale-up for production of rabies vaccine live adenovirus vector (AdRG1.3) Vaccine. 2012;30:300–306. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.10.095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Vos A, Freuling C, Ortmann S, et al. An assessment of shedding with the oral rabies virus vaccine strain SPBN GASGAS in target and non-target species. Vaccine. 2018;36:811–817. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.12.076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Fekadu M, Nesby SL, Shaddock JH, Schumacher CL, Linhart SB, Sanderlin DW. Immunogenicity, efficacy and safety of an oral rabies vaccine (SAG-2) in dogs. Vaccine. 1996;14:465–468. doi: 10.1016/0264-410x(95)00244-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research are provided here courtesy of Korean Vaccine Society

RESOURCES