Skip to main content
World Journal of Cardiology logoLink to World Journal of Cardiology
. 2025 Jul 26;17(7):106841. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v17.i7.106841

Advancing cardiac arrhythmia management: The integration of wearable technology and remote monitoring

Syed Faqeer Hussain Bokhari 1, Ali Bin Waseem 2, Hassan Raza 3, Asma Iqbal 4, Saad Javaid 5, Beya Idrees 6, Khawaja Allah Ditta Saad 7, Danyal Bakht 8, Wahidullah Dost 9
PMCID: PMC12304873  PMID: 40741014

Abstract

The integration of wearable technology and remote monitoring (RM) has significantly transformed the early detection, continuous monitoring, and management of cardiac arrhythmias. These conditions, characterized by irregular heart rhythms, arise from various etiological factors, including congenital, structural, immunological, metabolic, and infectious diseases, with atrial fibrillation being the most prevalent type. Diagnosing arrhythmias remains challenging due to variable clinical presentations and episodic symptom manifestations, necessitating individualized management strategies. Recent advances in wearable technology offer scalable, cost-effective solutions for real-time arrhythmia monitoring. These devices are equipped with sophisticated sensors and data analytics that enable early detection and personalized interventions, while empowering patients to actively engage in their healthcare. Integrating RM systems enhances diagnostic accuracy and facilitates timely medical interventions. Despite their potential, regulatory, legal, privacy, security, and infrastructural challenges hinder the widespread adoption of wearable technology and RM. Addressing these barriers requires collaboration among stakeholders and rigorous clinical trials to assess their efficacy and feasibility. Future research should focus on refining wearable technology, improving user experience, and integrating these innovations into existing healthcare frameworks. Overcoming these challenges will maximize the potential of wearable technology and RM, ultimately enhancing the management of cardiac arrhythmias and improving patient outcomes.

Keywords: Arrythmias, Wearables, Monitor, Cardiac, Atrial flutter


Core Tip: Wearable technology and remote monitoring are transforming the management of cardiac arrhythmias by enabling early detection, continuous monitoring, and personalized intervention. These advances enhance patient engagement and clinical decision-making through real-time data analytics. However, challenges such as regulatory, privacy, and infrastructural barriers must be addressed to optimize integration into healthcare systems. Future research should focus on refining the technology, improving user experience, and conducting robust clinical trials to ensure efficacy and feasibility, ultimately improving patient outcomes.

INTRODUCTION

Cardiac arrhythmias, which manifest as irregularities in heart rhythm, are associated with an extensive array of etiological factors including congenital, structural, immunological, physical, metabolic, and infectious diseases[1]. Based on diagnosed cases in the general population, they exhibit a prevalence of 1.5% to 5%, with atrial fibrillation emerging as the predominant variant[2]. Arrhythmias can be asymptomatic or symptomatic and often present in a paroxysmal fashion, which complicates the accurate estimation of their true prevalence. The diagnostic process for arrhythmias is challenging due to the variable clinical presentations and episodic symptom manifestation, demanding a range of management approaches tailored to specific patient conditions[3].

Traditional methods, such as short-term recordings from standard electrocardiography (ECG) and prolonged Holter monitoring, often fail to capture intermittent arrhythmias and limit continuous, real-time cardiac assessment[4]. Recent advances in wearable technology have completely changed several facets of healthcare. With sensors and cutting-edge algorithms, wearable technology has the potential to greatly improve the early diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias, leading to better patient outcomes[5]. The development of effective and efficient detection and management techniques has become crucial due to the increasing frequency of cardiac arrhythmias and the accompanying morbidity and death. By offering continuous, non-invasive monitoring of heart rhythms and enabling real-time feedback and action, wearable technology presents a possible option. Wearable technologies can detect arrhythmias early, helping prevent life-threatening consequences through prompt therapies and by empowering patients to actively engage in their care[6,7].

The accuracy and dependability of these devices have substantially increased due to development of sensor technology, signal processing algorithms, and data analytics, enabling accurate arrhythmia detection and categorization[8,9]. Real-time data transmission to healthcare experts has been made possible by the integration of wearable technology with telemedicine platforms and remote monitoring (RM) systems. This has allowed for prompt interventions and individualized treatment programs[8,10].

In recent years, RM has gained prominence, especially in the field of cardiac arrhythmias. In cardiac arrhythmias, RM leverages advanced technologies to manage patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices, enhancing care delivery[11]. Over the past decade, RM has evolved from basic transtelephonic monitoring to sophisticated systems capable of continuous, wireless data transmission, actively alerting healthcare providers to critical changes in patient status. This innovation allows for earlier diagnosis and intervention, reducing hospital visits and improving survival rates[12]. RM is particularly beneficial during constraints like the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, as it supports remote care and reduces healthcare costs while expanding access, especially in underserved areas[11,12]. RM's efficiency and safety promise broader applications in managing chronic conditions[13].

This narrative review provides a comprehensive evaluation of the transformative role wearable technologies and RM systems play in managing cardiac arrhythmias. This article scrutinizes the clinical efficacy and user engagement of diverse wearable devices within healthcare settings, delving into their validation processes and patient acceptability. It further investigates advances in remote patient monitoring, focusing on clinical validity and effectiveness, alongside an exploration of patient-centric experiences and acceptance of these technologies. The review further integrates wearable technology with RM, discussing the clinical ramifications of such integrations and identifying extant barriers and challenges. Additionally, it projects future innovations in wearable and remote health technologies and their expected impact on health outcomes and systemic efficiency in healthcare. The narrative concludes with strategic recommendations aimed at enhancing clinical practice and guiding further research in wearable and remote health monitoring, thereby informing healthcare professionals and industry stakeholders of the progressive capabilities and potential of these technologies in cardiological patient care.

EXPLORATION OF WEARABLE TECHNOLOGIES IN HEALTH CARE

Wearable technology encompasses electronic devices designed to be worn on the body, often embedded within clothing or accessories, facilitating the collection and transmission of physiological data[14]. These devices are equipped with advanced sensors to monitor and document a variety of health metrics[15]. Examples of wearable technology include smartwatches, fitness bands, subcutaneous implants, and chest straps, as summarized and described in Table 1. A predominant method for detecting cardiac arrhythmias involves ECG monitoring, wherein wearable devices with integrated ECG sensors utilize electrodes to continuously monitor heart rhythms and promptly identify any abnormal patterns[16,17]. Additionally, photoplethysmography (PPG) monitoring represents an innovative approach, employing optical sensors to detect changes in blood volume, thereby providing insights into heart rate and rhythm irregularities[18]. Wearable devices equipped with PPG sensors offer a non-invasive solution for arrhythmia detection. Furthermore, while not traditionally wearable, Implantable Loop Recorders (ILRs) are small devices implanted under the skin that continuously monitor heart rhythms, capturing sporadic arrhythmias and enhancing the understanding of a patient's cardiac health[19]. However, motion artifacts can affect signal quality and increase the false-positive rate, while a low signal-to-noise ratio can lead to missed diagnoses.

Table 1.

Types of wearable technology

Type of wearable technology
Description
Smartwatches Worn on the wrist and fitted with sensors to monitor heart rhythm
Fitness bands Designed for tracking one’s health, including heart rate monitoring and activity tracking
ECG sensors Electrodes are used to measure cardiac rhythms and offer ongoing surveillance
ILRs Implanted devices for continuous heart rhythm monitoring, suitable for chronic arrhythmias
PPG Use optical sensors to detect anomalies in heartbeat and differences in blood volume

ECG: Electrocardiography; ILRs: Implantable Loop Recorders; PPG: Photoplethysmography.

CLINICAL EFFICACY AND VALIDATION

When evaluating the efficacy of wearable technology as a diagnostic tool, accuracy and reliability are key considerations. The degree of accuracy of wearable technology is primarily determined by its sensitivity and specificity in identifying cardiac arrhythmias. High specificity guarantees precise identification of those without arrhythmias, while high sensitivity guarantees correct identification of those with them. Nazarian et al[20] demonstrated that the overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of smartwatches in identifying cardiac arrhythmias were 100%, 95%, and 97%, respectively. These values vary depending on device, patient demographics, and arrhythmia subtype. Smart wearables have been beneficial in remote cardiovascular disease screening and diagnosis, including arrhythmias[21]. Multiple studies have contrasted the outcomes of wearable technology, such as ECG or PPG sensor-equipped devices, with industry-recognized diagnostic methods, such as traditional ECGs. These studies have shown a high degree of concordance, demonstrating that wearable technology can enable accurate and reliable detection of cardiac arrhythmias[22,23].

ILRs are invasive techniques that accurately and reliably capture infrequent arrhythmia episodes over long periods of time, making them appropriate for chronic arrhythmias[19]. PPG and ECG wearable devices offer non-invasive, straightforward options with high accuracy. The continuous or sporadic monitoring offered by PPG and ECG devices enables event-based recording and short-term tracking[24].

PATIENT ENGAGEMENT AND ACCEPTABILITY

The emergence of wearable technology has revolutionized the early detection and ongoing surveillance of cardiac arrhythmias, offering unprecedented levels of convenience, functionality, and advantages (Table 2). These innovative devices offer a new dimension of accessibility for individuals concerned about their cardiac health, merging ergonomic designs with lightweight features to ensure maximal comfort. Users can effortlessly wear these devices continuously, including during sleep, without discomfort. Equipped with advanced sensors, these wearables provide accurate real-time monitoring, capturing even minute fluctuations in cardiac rhythm. Cardiac devices significantly enhance wellness by extending life, improving functional conditions, and reducing psychological stress. These technologies decrease stroke incidence and hospital admissions, enhance hemodynamic performance to increase exercise capacity, and alleviate arrhythmia symptoms. They also improve sleep quality and elevate self-efficacy and self-esteem[25].

Table 2.

Benefits of wearable technology

Benefits of wearable technology
Early detection of arrhythmias by continuous monitoring
Improved patient therapeutic adherence and self-management
Increased patient participation in their healthcare
Real-time data streaming for immediate intervention
Personalized treatment plans for improved outcomes
Comfortable and easy-to-use equipment for a better patient experience

The comfort and practicality of these wearable devices significantly enhance both patient and clinician experiences in cardiac monitoring. Devices that are user-friendly and comfortable for patients can enhance self-management, alleviate anxiety, and enrich quality of life[26,27]. User-friendly smartphone applications allow individuals to readily access their cardiac data, track trends in heart health, and share vital information with healthcare providers. Devices that are comfortable and straightforward for physicians to use can enhance diagnostic accuracy, reduce clinical workload, refine treatment options, and facilitate better communication with patients[21,27]. Although preliminary evidence suggests improvements in psychological well-being, further studies are needed to confirm these effects.

ADVANCES IN REMOTE PATIENT MONITORING

RM refers to the monitoring of a patient’s health outside of traditional clinical environments[28]. This approach may incorporate devices such as wearable or implantable sensors, which furnish healthcare providers with critical data for analysis. The scope of RM is broad, encompassing digital monitoring, telemedicine, cloud-based RM systems, and mobile health (mHealth) applications, as detailed in Table 3[29].

Table 3.

Types of remote monitoring

Type of remote monitoring
Description
Telemedicine Utilizes communication technology to provide remote medical care
mHealth Apps Apps and smart devices for heart rhythm monitoring and data transfer
Cloud-based remote monitoring Healthcare practitioners can access data via cloud storage and analysis

mHealth: Mobile health.

Telemedicine and telemonitoring

Telemedicine leverages communication technologies to provide remote medical services[30]. Online patient health monitoring constitutes a subset of telemonitoring, which itself is a specialized form of telemedicine. In the context of cardiac arrhythmias, telemonitoring involves the utilization of wearable or implantable devices that transmit cardiac rhythm data to healthcare professionals for diagnostic analysis[31].

mHealth applications

The term "mHealth" describes the application of smart devices to support healthcare. These applications often feature tools that allow individuals to monitor their cardiac rhythm and transmit pertinent data to their healthcare provider in cases of cardiac arrhythmias[32].

Cloud-based RM systems

Cloud-based systems allow healthcare professionals to access patient data from any location, offering the flexibility of remote data storage and analysis. Research indicates that cloud-based systems for heart disease prediction can achieve up to 93.33% accuracy[33].

CLINICAL VALIDITY AND EFFECTIVENESS

RM offers a reliable and consistent stream of data characterized by high accuracy and dependability[34]. Multiple studies have demonstrated that RM systems can capture unnoticed arrhythmias during routine clinical visits, as demonstrated by mobile cardiac telemetry and ILRs[35,36]. However, these systems can generate false positives, requiring confirmation by healthcare providers. Numerous investigations have evaluated the efficacy of diverse RM approaches in detecting and managing cardiac arrhythmias. These studies generally conclude that all RM modalities can effectively control arrhythmias[37-39].

PATIENT-CENTRIC EVALUATION

RM devices are frequently perceived by patients as user-friendly and comfortable to wear[40]. Adherence and compliance, which reflect how well patients follow their prescribed treatment plans with these systems, are generally high, as noted in multiple studies[41]. The use of RM systems may influence a patient's overall well-being. Studies show that adopting RM systems can enhance patients' quality of life by better managing their conditions[42]. However, they may overlook patient-level barriers that could affect these outcomes (e.g., technological literacy and cost).

SYNERGISTIC INTEGRATION WITH RM

Implantable devices and wireless monitoring represent significant advancements with the potential to transform cardiac arrhythmia management[43]. The integrated utilization of wearable devices and RM presents distinct advantages for individuals afflicted with cardiac arrhythmias[44]. Notably, it empowers patients to self-monitor their cardiac rhythm in home settings, facilitating early detection and tracking of any deviations in heart rate or rhythm[45]. Furthermore, this technology empowers healthcare providers to conduct comprehensive patient monitoring, facilitating prompt diagnosis and management of arrhythmias[46]. Lastly, it enhances therapy adherence among individuals with cardiac arrhythmias[47].

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

An increasing volume of scientific literature encourages the use of wearable technology and RM for cardiac arrhythmia management[48]. Multiple investigations have found that such innovations can minimize hospital readmissions, enhance patient outcomes, and improve quality of life[49]. For example, a study by Hale et al[49] indicated that patients suffering from chronic heart failure who had their condition remotely evaluated with wearable technology had an 80% reduction in risk of all-cause hospitalization. While RM has demonstrated efficacy in reducing hospitalizations in chronic heart failure, further studies are needed to establish its direct impact on arrhythmia-related admissions. Another study revealed that wearable devices equipped with PPG and accelerometer sensors can accurately identify heart rate anomalies in individuals with prevalent cardiac symptoms[50].

BARRIERS AND CHALLENGES

Despite the potential benefits of wearable technology and RM, several barriers hinder their widespread adoption[44].

Regulatory and legal considerations

Prior to achieving widespread adoption of wearable technology and RM, extensive administrative and legal obstacles must be addressed[51,52]. Notably, significant issues have been raised concerning patient data confidentiality and device reliability[53].

Privacy and security concerns

Patients may be worried about device safety, in addition to the privacy of their data[54]. To gain confidence among patients, healthcare providers must tackle those issues. Developing standardized data encryption protocols could address privacy concerns.

Infrastructural and resource constraints

Before widespread adoption of wearable technology and RM is feasible, numerous infrastructural and resource-related challenges must be addressed. For instance, healthcare providers require a robust framework for patient data collection and analysis, which is essential for effectively integrating these technologies into clinical practice[47].

Despite these barriers, wearable technology and RM have the potential to fundamentally transform cardiac arrhythmia management. As these innovations continue to advance, their utilization will become increasingly prevalent in the forthcoming years[43].

FUTURE TRENDS AND IMPLICATIONS

Wearable technology and remote management

Advances in wearable technology and remote management hold transformative potential for healthcare, particularly in enhancing patient outcomes through early diagnosis, monitoring, and management of cardiac arrhythmias[55]. Wearable technology offers scalable and cost-effective opportunities for real-time, RM of patients with cardiac arrhythmias, facilitating timely interventions and personalized treatment approaches[56]. The integration of wearable technology and remote management innovations enables healthcare professionals to enhance patient care by supporting early detection, ongoing monitoring, and tailored interventions[57]. However, to fully capitalize on the potential of wearable technology in cardiac arrhythmias and other medical fields, it is imperative to address the aforementioned challenges.

Looking to the future, the implications of wearable technology in clinical practice are expansive. Ongoing enhancements in sensor technology, data analytics, and connectivity are expected to augment the capabilities of wearable devices, enabling more accurate monitoring and customized interventions. Incorporation of wearable technology into routine healthcare practices promises to improve patient outcomes, reduce healthcare costs, and empower patients to take an active role in managing their health[58].

Patient outcomes and health care delivery

Wearable technology holds considerable promise in revolutionizing patient outcomes and healthcare delivery[59]. By facilitating remote patient monitoring, wearable technologies have the potential to mitigate healthcare costs by reducing reliance on expensive emergency department visits and unnecessary hospitalizations[60]. Moreover, wearable and mobile technologies offer scalable and cost-effective solutions for remote patient monitoring, particularly during critical phases of cardiac disease, even in real-time settings[61]. The integration of such technologies enables healthcare providers to access both objective health data and patient-reported information, thereby empowering them to make well-informed therapeutic decisions. Ultimately, the incorporation of wearable technology has the potential to enhance treatment outcomes, including improved treatment adherence and patient quality of life[62].

Strategic recommendations

Collaboration among numerous stakeholders is necessary to realize the full potential of wearable technology in the early diagnosis, monitoring, and management of cardiac arrhythmias[63-65]. To effectively manage the vast influx of data from wearable devices, a multidisciplinary approach involving academics, healthcare professionals, software developers, information technologists, and statisticians is crucial. In clinical practice, healthcare providers should pinpoint specific clinical scenarios where wearable technology can significantly enhance patient-centered outcomes. It is vital to engage with patients to ensure their comfort with and understanding of wearable devices, and to educate them about the benefits of RM[64,65].

To fully leverage the capabilities of wearable technologies, rigorously designed clinical trials are necessary[65]. These trials should integrate data from wearable devices with solid clinical outcomes, offering critical insights into the effectiveness and feasibility of incorporating wearable technology into routine clinical practice. Such studies will guide future implementation strategies, optimizing the impact on patient care and health outcomes.

Additionally, ongoing research must continuously refine and improve wearable technology, focusing on factors such as accuracy, reliability, user experience, and integration with existing healthcare frameworks. Addressing these issues will enable wearable technology to become an invaluable tool for the early detection, continuous monitoring, and personalized management of cardiac arrhythmias. Collaboration with regulatory agencies is critical to establishing guidelines for device approval and data security.

CONCLUSION

This narrative review highlights considerable advances in cardiology through technological innovation. Wearable technology, equipped with sophisticated sensors and underpinned by robust algorithms, has been transformative in the early detection and ongoing monitoring of cardiac arrhythmias. These devices provide non-invasive, real-time monitoring of heart rhythms, significantly enhancing diagnostic precision and patient management. Similarly, RM systems have revolutionized care delivery by enabling continuous data transmission to healthcare providers, thereby facilitating timely medical interventions that have demonstrably reduced hospital admissions and improved patient survival rates. The convergence of wearable technology with RM systems signifies a fundamental shift in cardiac arrhythmia management. This integrated approach not only centralizes patient involvement in their own care but also supports the development of personalized treatment strategies tailored to individual patient needs. The receptivity of patients towards this technology, alongside empirical evidence, underscores its ability to improve clinical outcomes and life quality. Nonetheless, the full exploitation of these technologies is hindered by challenges including regulatory issues, concerns over data privacy, and the requirement for enhanced infrastructure. Addressing these challenges requires a concerted effort among clinicians, researchers, and technologists to further refine and validate these innovations. Looking ahead, it is clear that wearable and RM technologies will assume a critical role in healthcare. Anticipated advancements are likely to further improve their precision and ease of use, solidifying their position as essential tools in combating cardiac arrhythmias. Strategic recommendations call for interdisciplinary research and clinical trials to confirm the effectiveness of these technologies, ensuring that they meet the stringent requirements of contemporary medical practice and achieve widespread clinical integration. Ultimately, these efforts are expected to standardize these technologies in cardiac care, promising enhanced patient outcomes and more efficient healthcare delivery. Through continuous innovation and collaboration, wearable and RM technologies have the potential to become the cornerstone of personalized arrhythmia management.

Footnotes

Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.

Provenance and peer review: Unsolicited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Cardiac and cardiovascular systems

Country of origin: Afghanistan

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade B, Grade C

Novelty: Grade B, Grade B

Creativity or Innovation: Grade B, Grade B

Scientific Significance: Grade B, Grade C

P-Reviewer: Sun PT S-Editor: Li L L-Editor: Filipodia P-Editor: Zhang XD

Contributor Information

Syed Faqeer Hussain Bokhari, Department of Medicine and Surgery, King Edward Medical University, Lahore 54000, Punjab, Pakistan.

Ali Bin Waseem, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Lahore Medical & Dental College, Lahore 5340, Punjab, Pakistan.

Hassan Raza, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Lahore Medical & Dental College, Lahore 5340, Punjab, Pakistan.

Asma Iqbal, Department of Medicine and Surgery, King Edward Medical University, Lahore 54000, Punjab, Pakistan.

Saad Javaid, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Lahore Medical & Dental College, Lahore 5340, Punjab, Pakistan.

Beya Idrees, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Lahore Medical & Dental College, Lahore 5340, Punjab, Pakistan.

Khawaja Allah Ditta Saad, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Lahore Medical & Dental College, Lahore 5340, Punjab, Pakistan.

Danyal Bakht, Department of Medicine and Surgery, King Edward Medical University, Lahore 54000, Punjab, Pakistan.

Wahidullah Dost, Department of Curative Medicine, Kabul University of Medical Sciences, Kabul 10001, Afghanistan. wahidullahdost96@gmail.com.

References

  • 1.Vukmir RB. Cardiac arrhythmia diagnosis. Am J Emerg Med. 1995;13:204–210. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(95)90095-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lakshminarayan K, Anderson DC, Herzog CA, Qureshi AI. Clinical epidemiology of atrial fibrillation and related cerebrovascular events in the United States. Neurologist. 2008;14:143–150. doi: 10.1097/NRL.0b013e31815cffae. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Desai DS, Hajouli S. Arrhythmias. 2023 Jun 5. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, 2025. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Carrington M, Providência R, Chahal CAA, Ricci F, Epstein AE, Gallina S, Fedorowski A, Sutton R, Khanji MY. Monitoring and diagnosis of intermittent arrhythmias: evidence-based guidance and role of novel monitoring strategies. Eur Heart J Open. 2022;2:oeac072. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeac072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sajeev JK, Koshy AN, Teh AW. Wearable devices for cardiac arrhythmia detection: a new contender? Intern Med J. 2019;49:570–573. doi: 10.1111/imj.14274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Xintarakou A, Sousonis V, Asvestas D, Vardas PE, Tzeis S. Remote Cardiac Rhythm Monitoring in the Era of Smart Wearables: Present Assets and Future Perspectives. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:853614. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.853614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nemati S, Ghassemi MM, Ambai V, Isakadze N, Levantsevych O, Shah A, Clifford GD. Monitoring and detecting atrial fibrillation using wearable technology. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2016;2016:3394–3397. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2016.7591456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lawin D, Albrecht UV, Oftring ZS, Lawrenz T, Stellbrink C, Kuhn S. [Mobile health for detection of atrial fibrillation-Status quo and perspectives] Internist (Berl) 2022;63:274–280. doi: 10.1007/s00108-022-01267-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Passman R. Mobile health technologies in the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2022;37:1–9. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Baman JR, Mathew DT, Jiang M, Passman RS. Mobile Health for Arrhythmia Diagnosis and Management. J Gen Intern Med. 2022;37:188–197. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07007-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Vandenberk B, Raj SR. Remote Patient Monitoring: What Have We Learned and Where Are We Going? Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2023;17:103–115. doi: 10.1007/s12170-023-00720-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cheung CC, Deyell MW. Remote Monitoring of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices. Can J Cardiol. 2018;34:941–944. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2018.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Whitehead D, Conley J. The Next Frontier of Remote Patient Monitoring: Hospital at Home. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e42335. doi: 10.2196/42335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ancans A, Greitans M, Cacurs R, Banga B, Rozentals A. Wearable Sensor Clothing for Body Movement Measurement during Physical Activities in Healthcare. Sensors (Basel) 2021;21:2068. doi: 10.3390/s21062068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hong YJ, Lee H, Kim J, Lee M, Choi HJ, Hyeon T, Kim D. Multifunctional Wearable System that Integrates Sweat‐Based Sensing and Vital‐Sign Monitoring to Estimate Pre‐/Post‐Exercise Glucose Levels. Adv Funct Materials. 2018;28:1805754. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bosch A, Ulmer HE, Keller HE, Bonzel KE, Schärer K. Electrocardiographic monitoring in children with chronic renal failure. Pediatr Nephrol. 1990;4:140–144. doi: 10.1007/BF00858825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Solomon MD, Yang J, Sung SH, Livingston ML, Sarlas G, Lenane JC, Go AS. Incidence and timing of potentially high-risk arrhythmias detected through long term continuous ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016;16:35. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0210-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fahoum ASA, Zaben AA, Seafan W. A multiple signal classification approach for photoplethysmography signals in healthy and athletic subjects. Int J Biomed Eng Tec. 2015;17:1. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Reinsch N, Ruprecht U, Buchholz J, Diehl RR, Kälsch H, Neven K. The BioMonitor 2 insertable cardiac monitor: Clinical experience with a novel implantable cardiac monitor. J Electrocardiol. 2018;51:751–755. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.05.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nazarian S, Lam K, Darzi A, Ashrafian H. Diagnostic Accuracy of Smartwatches for the Detection of Cardiac Arrhythmia: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23:e28974. doi: 10.2196/28974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bayoumy K, Gaber M, Elshafeey A, Mhaimeed O, Dineen EH, Marvel FA, Martin SS, Muse ED, Turakhia MP, Tarakji KG, Elshazly MB. Smart wearable devices in cardiovascular care: where we are and how to move forward. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021;18:581–599. doi: 10.1038/s41569-021-00522-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Paradkar N, Chowdhury SR. Cardiac arrhythmia detection using photoplethysmography. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2017;2017:113–116. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2017.8036775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Choi W, Kim SH, Lee W, Kang SH, Yoon CH, Youn TJ, Chae IH. Comparison of Continuous ECG Monitoring by Wearable Patch Device and Conventional Telemonitoring Device. J Korean Med Sci. 2020;35:e363. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Alqudah AM, Qananwah Q, M K Dagamseh A, Qazan S, Albadarneh A, Alzyout A. Multiple time and spectral analysis techniques for comparing the PhotoPlethysmography to PiezoelectricPlethysmography with electrocardiography. Med Hypotheses. 2020;143:109870. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2020.109870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Willy K, Ellermann C, Reinke F, Rath B, Wolfes J, Eckardt L, Doldi F, Wegner FK, Köbe J, Morina N. The Impact of Cardiac Devices on Patients' Quality of Life-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022;9:257. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9080257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Duncker D, Ding WY, Etheridge S, Noseworthy PA, Veltmann C, Yao X, Bunch TJ, Gupta D. Smart Wearables for Cardiac Monitoring-Real-World Use beyond Atrial Fibrillation. Sensors (Basel) 2021;21:2539. doi: 10.3390/s21072539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pektok E, Demirozu ZT, Arat N, Yildiz O, Oklu E, Eker D, Ece F, Ciftci C, Yazicioglu N, Bayindir O, Kucukaksu DS. Remote monitoring of left ventricular assist device parameters after HeartAssist-5 implantation. Artif Organs. 2013;37:820–825. doi: 10.1111/aor.12144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kang M, Park E, Cho BH, Lee KS. Recent Patient Health Monitoring Platforms Incorporating Internet of Things-Enabled Smart Devices. Int Neurourol J. 2018;22:S76–S82. doi: 10.5213/inj.1836144.072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Keikhosrokiani P, Zakaria N, Mustaffa N, Wan T, Sarwar MI, Azimi K. Wireless Networks in Mobile Healthcare. In: Adibi S, editor. Mobile Health. Springer Series in Bio-/Neuroinformatics. Cham: Springer, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kędzierski K, Radziejewska J, Sławuta A, Wawrzyńska M, Arkowski J. Telemedicine in Cardiology: Modern Technologies to Improve Cardiovascular Patients' Outcomes-A Narrative Review. Medicina (Kaunas) 2022;58:210. doi: 10.3390/medicina58020210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Franz-vasdeki J, Pratt BA, Newsome M, Germann S. Taking mHealth Solutions to Scale: Enabling Environments and Successful Implementation. J Mob Technol Med. 2015;4:35–38. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Adnan Khan M, Abbas S, Atta A, Ditta A, Alquhayz H, Farhan Khan M, Atta-ur-rahman, Ali Naqvi R. Intelligent Cloud Based Heart Disease Prediction System Empowered with Supervised Machine Learning. CMC Comput Mater Continua. 2020;65:139–151. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chen JM, Peng H, Razi A. Remote ECG Monitoring Kit to Predict Patient-Specific Heart Abnormalities. J Syst Cybern Inf. 2017;15:82–89. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Weidemann F, Maier SK, Störk S, Brunner T, Liu D, Hu K, Seydelmann N, Schneider A, Becher J, Canan-Kühl S, Blaschke D, Bijnens B, Ertl G, Wanner C, Nordbeck P. Usefulness of an Implantable Loop Recorder to Detect Clinically Relevant Arrhythmias in Patients With Advanced Fabry Cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2016;118:264–274. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.04.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Maines M, Zorzi A, Tomasi G, Angheben C, Catanzariti D, Piffer L, Del Greco M. Clinical impact, safety, and accuracy of the remotely monitored implantable loop recorder Medtronic Reveal LINQTM. Europace. 2018;20:1050–1057. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Marcantoni L, Toselli T, Urso G, Pratola C, Ceconi C, Bertini M. Impact of remote monitoring on the management of arrhythmias in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2015;16:775–781. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Chang W, Hou CJ, Wei S, Tsai J, Chen Y, Chen M, Chuech C, Hung C, Huang M, Lee C, Yeh H, Shih S. Utilization and Clinical Feasibility of a Handheld Remote Electrocardiography Recording Device in Cardiac Arrhythmias and Atrial Fibrillation: A Pilot Study. Int J Gerontol. 2015;9:206–210. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Osca J, Sanchotello MJ, Navarro J, Cano O, Raso R, Castro JE, Olagüe J, Salvador A. Technical reliability and clinical safety of a remote monitoring system for antiarrhythmic cardiac devices. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2009;62:886–895. doi: 10.1016/s1885-5857(09)72653-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Artico J, Zecchin M, Zorzin Fantasia A, Skerl G, Ortis B, Franco S, Albani S, Barbati G, Cristallini J, Cannata' A, Sinagra G. Long-term patient satisfaction with implanted device remote monitoring: a comparison among different systems. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2019;20:542–550. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Varma N, Michalski J, Stambler B, Pavri BB TRUST Investigators. Superiority of automatic remote monitoring compared with in-person evaluation for scheduled ICD follow-up in the TRUST trial - testing execution of the recommendations. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:1345–1352. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Walker RC, Tong A, Howard K, Palmer SC. Patient expectations and experiences of remote monitoring for chronic diseases: Systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Int J Med Inform. 2019;124:78–85. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ikeda T. Current Use and Future Needs of Noninvasive Ambulatory Electrocardiogram Monitoring. Intern Med. 2021;60:9–14. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.5691-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mizuno A, Changolkar S, Patel MS. Wearable Devices to Monitor and Reduce the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: Evidence and Opportunities. Annu Rev Med. 2021;72:459–471. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-050919-031534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Marcelli E, Capucci A, Minardi G, Cercenelli L. Multi-Sense CardioPatch: A Wearable Patch for Remote Monitoring of Electro-Mechanical Cardiac Activity. ASAIO J. 2017;63:73–79. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Martirosyan M, Caliskan K, Theuns DAMJ, Szili-Torok T. Remote monitoring of heart failure: benefits for therapeutic decision making. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2017;15:503–515. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2017.1348229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Shrivastav M, Padte S, Arora V, Biffi M. Pilot evaluation of an integrated monitor-adhesive patch for long-term cardiac arrhythmia detection in India. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2014;12:25–35. doi: 10.1586/14779072.2013.867807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Valchinov E, Antoniou A, Rotas K, Pallikarakis N. Wearable ECG System for Health and Sports Monitoring. In: MOBIHEALTH. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Wireless Mobile Communication and Healthcare - "Transforming healthcare through innovations in mobile and wireless technologies"; 2014 Dec; IEEE, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Gatouillat A, Massot B, Badr Y, Sejdić E, Gehin C. Building IoT-Enabled Wearable Medical Devices: An Application to a Wearable, Multiparametric, Cardiorespiratory Sensor. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies (BIOSTEC 2018) - BIODEVICES; 2018; Funchal, Madeira, Portugal: SciTePress, 2018: 109-118. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hale TM, Jethwani K, Kandola MS, Saldana F, Kvedar JC. A Remote Medication Monitoring System for Chronic Heart Failure Patients to Reduce Readmissions: A Two-Arm Randomized Pilot Study. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18:e91. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Bonomi A, Eerikäinen LM, Schipper F, Aarts RM, de Morree HM, Dekker L. Detecting Episodes of Brady- and Tachycardia Using Photo-plethysmography at the Wrist in Free-living Conditions. In: 2017 Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC); 2017 Sep 24-27; Rennes, France: IEEE, 2017: 1-4. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Costa PD, Rodrigues PP, Reis AH, Costa-Pereira A. A review on remote monitoring technology applied to implantable electronic cardiovascular devices. Telemed J E Health. 2010;16:1042–1050. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2010.0082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Segura Anaya LH, Alsadoon A, Costadopoulos N, Prasad PWC. Ethical Implications of User Perceptions of Wearable Devices. Sci Eng Ethics. 2018;24:1–28. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9872-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Banerjee S, Hemphill T, Longstreet P. Wearable devices and healthcare: Data sharing and privacy. Inf Soc. 2018;34:49–57. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Umeda A, Inoue T, Takahashi T, Wakamatsu H. Telemonitoring of Patients with Implantable Cardiac Devices to Manage Heart Failure: An Evaluation of Tablet-PC-Based Nursing Intervention Program. Open J Nurs. 2014;04:237–250. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Chen W, Khurshid S, Singer DE, Atlas SJ, Ashburner JM, Ellinor PT, McManus DD, Lubitz SA, Chhatwal J. Cost-effectiveness of Screening for Atrial Fibrillation Using Wearable Devices. JAMA Health Forum. 2022;3:e222419. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.2419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Singhal A, Cowie MR. The Role of Wearables in Heart Failure. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2020;17:125–132. doi: 10.1007/s11897-020-00467-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Radhakrishnan S, Duvvuru A, Kamarthi SV. Investigating Discrete Event Simulation Method to Assess the Effectiveness of Wearable Health Monitoring Devices. Procedia Econ Financ. 2014;11:838–856. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Armenian SH, Rinderknecht D, Au K, Lindenfeld L, Mills G, Siyahian A, Herrera C, Wilson K, Venkataraman K, Mascarenhas K, Tavallali P, Razavi M, Pahlevan N, Detterich J, Bhatia S, Gharib M. Accuracy of a Novel Handheld Wireless Platform for Detection of Cardiac Dysfunction in Anthracycline-Exposed Survivors of Childhood Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24:3119–3125. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Chong KPL, Guo JZ, Deng X, Woo BKP. Consumer Perceptions of Wearable Technology Devices: Retrospective Review and Analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8:e17544. doi: 10.2196/17544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ferguson C, Inglis SC, Breen PP, Gargiulo GD, Byiers V, Macdonald PS, Hickman LD. Clinician Perspectives on the Design and Application of Wearable Cardiac Technologies for Older Adults: Qualitative Study. JMIR Aging. 2020;3:e17299. doi: 10.2196/17299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Burnham JP, Lu C, Yaeger LH, Bailey TC, Kollef MH. Using wearable technology to predict health outcomes: a literature review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018;25:1221–1227. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Yetisen AK, Martinez-Hurtado JL, Ünal B, Khademhosseini A, Butt H. Wearables in Medicine. Adv Mater. 2018;30:e1706910. doi: 10.1002/adma.201706910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Hughes A, Shandhi MMH, Master H, Dunn J, Brittain E. Wearable Devices in Cardiovascular Medicine. Circ Res. 2023;132:652–670. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.122.322389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Bhaltadak V, Ghewade B, Yelne S. A Comprehensive Review on Advancements in Wearable Technologies: Revolutionizing Cardiovascular Medicine. Cureus. 2024;16:e61312. doi: 10.7759/cureus.61312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Liao Y, Thompson C, Peterson S, Mandrola J, Beg MS. The Future of Wearable Technologies and Remote Monitoring in Health Care. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2019;39:115–121. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_238919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from World Journal of Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Baishideng Publishing Group Inc

RESOURCES