Skip to main content
PMC home page
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1999 Aug 24;161(4):376–380.

Regional variations in the use of home care services in Ontario, 1993/95

P C Coyte 1, W Young 1
PMCID: PMC1230537  PMID: 10478160

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although regional variations in the use of many health care services have been reported, little attention has been devoted to home care practices. Given the dramatic shift in care settings from hospitals to private homes, it is important to determine the extent to which home care practices vary by geographic region. METHODS: Data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information and the Ontario Home Care Administration System database were used to assess regional variations in rates of home care use following inpatient care and same-day surgery for the fiscal years 1993, 1994 and 1995. Various measures of regional variation were employed. RESULTS: Of the 2,870,695 inpatient separations and 1,803,307 same-day surgery separations during the study period, 359,972 and 64,541, respectively, were followed by home care. The rate of home care use per 100 separations was 12.5 for inpatients and 3.6 for same-day surgery patients. There was a a 3.5-fold regional variation in the rates of home care use following inpatient care and a 7-fold variation in rates of use following same-day surgery. Additional home care funding to attain calculated target rates was estimated to be $48.9 million (30% of expenditures for patients recently discharged from hospital over the study period). For a 20% increase in service provision it was estimated that an additional injection of $42.2 million is required. INTERPRETATION: The wide regional variations in rates of home care use highlight the importance of modifying home care funding to ensure that all residents of Ontario have equal access to services. To achieve this our estimates suggest that a substantial increase in home care funding is warranted.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (126.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cain K. C., Diehr P. Testing the null hypothesis in small area analysis. Health Serv Res. 1992 Aug;27(3):267–294. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cleary P. D., Greenfield S., Mulley A. G., Pauker S. G., Schroeder S. A., Wexler L., McNeil B. J. Variations in length of stay and outcomes for six medical and surgical conditions in Massachusetts and California. JAMA. 1991 Jul 3;266(1):73–79. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Diehr P., Cain K., Connell F., Volinn E. What is too much variation? The null hypothesis in small-area analysis. Health Serv Res. 1990 Feb;24(6):741–771. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Greenfield S. The state of outcome research: are we on target? N Engl J Med. 1989 Apr 27;320(17):1142–1143. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198904273201710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hughes S. L., Ulasevich A., Weaver F. M., Henderson W., Manheim L., Kubal J. D., Bonarigo F. Impact of home care on hospital days: a meta analysis. Health Serv Res. 1997 Oct;32(4):415–432. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jackson R. A. Home care: the cornerstone of health renewal in Nova Scotia. Leadersh Health Serv. 1995 Nov-Dec;4(6):5-7, 14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jacobs P., Hall E., Henderson I., Nichols D. Episodic acute care costs: linking inpatient and home care. Can J Public Health. 1995 May-Jun;86(3):200–205. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kazandjian V. A., Durance P. W., Schork M. A. The extremal quotient in small-area variation analysis. Health Serv Res. 1989 Dec;24(5):665–684. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. McPherson K., Wennberg J. E., Hovind O. B., Clifford P. Small-area variations in the use of common surgical procedures: an international comparison of New England, England, and Norway. N Engl J Med. 1982 Nov 18;307(21):1310–1314. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198211183072104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Salive M. E., Mayfield J. A., Weissman N. W. Patient Outcomes Research Teams and the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Health Serv Res. 1990 Dec;25(5):697–708. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Soderstrom L., Tousignant P., Kaufman T. The health and cost effects of substituting home care for inpatient acute care: a review of the evidence. CMAJ. 1999 Apr 20;160(8):1151–1155. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Stewart R. L., Lund M. Home care: the Ontario experience. Pride Inst J Long Term Home Health Care. 1990 Summer;9(3):15–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Weissert W. G. Seven reasons why it is so difficult to make community-based long-term care cost-effective. Health Serv Res. 1985 Oct;20(4):423–433. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Welch H. G., Wennberg D. E., Welch W. P. The use of Medicare home health care services. N Engl J Med. 1996 Aug 1;335(5):324–329. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199608013350506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wennberg J., Gittelsohn A. Variations in medical care among small areas. Sci Am. 1982 Apr;246(4):120–134. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0482-120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wennberg J., Gittelsohn Small area variations in health care delivery. Science. 1973 Dec 14;182(4117):1102–1108. doi: 10.1126/science.182.4117.1102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES