Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2025 Jul 14;27(29):7779–7784. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5c02038

Red-Shifted Glycoporphyrins: Synthesis via Sonogashira Cross-Coupling and Studies on Reactive Oxygen Species Production

Dariusz Baran 1, Maciej Malinowski 1,*
PMCID: PMC12305654  PMID: 40658819

Abstract

Glycoporphyrins are in the spotlight as third-generation photosensitizers. Herein, we present a new Sonogashira-based methodology toward C–C-bonded, diverse carbohydrate–porphyrin hybrids. The sugar unit is for the first time effectively conjugated with a porphyrin system, resulting in a bathochromic shift of absorption maxima. The products generate reactive oxygen species with the use of 690–740 nm visible light lamps, making them promising photosensitizers in phototherapies.


graphic file with name ol5c02038_0012.jpg


graphic file with name ol5c02038_0011.jpg


Alternative anticancer treatments are gaining momentum in modern studies. In particular, light-guided therapies such as PDT (photodynamic therapy) or PTT (photothermal therapy) are expanding their audience since they offer a great possibility of cancer elimination with minimal (if any) side effects during therapy. , Successful PDT relies on the selection of the proper photosensitizer (PS) that upon irradiation at a specific wavelength transforms local oxygen into reactive oxygen species (ROS). Therefore, modern studies pursue efficient PS that better meets the requirements of PDT. , Among the scaffolds, the family of porphyrinoids is one of the most exploited as PS, due to their high efficiency of ROS production and strong absorption in the visible light spectrum. Nevertheless, there are still some aspects that have to be improved to call porphyrin-based PS the future of phototherapy. First, synthetic porphyrins rarely solubilize in a physiological milieu, and they exhibit no directing abilities toward cancer cells.

Interestingly, glycoporphyrins (carbohydrate–porphyrin conjugates) are a subgroup of PS that perfectly meet the aforementioned criteria. A sugar moiety might be used as a Trojan Horse, due to its affinity for cancer lectins, so PS benefits from gaining targeting abilities toward cancer cells. Furthermore, hydrophilic saccharide units improve the solubility of the whole system in polar solvents. These findings have created impactful interest in glycoporphyrins as a third generation of PS. , However, the development of a versatile synthetic methodology toward sugar–porphyrin hybrids remains a challenging task due to the distinct chemical nature of both subunits. Therefore, new protocols are regularly introduced to overcome the limitations. Nevertheless, there is still one parameter that has not been explored with the use of sugar–porphyrin PS until now. It is sugar-influenced modification of the porphyrin UV–vis absorption profile. It is highly convenient if PS absorbs lower-energy and more penetrating red-shifted wavelengths.

Unfunctionalized, synthetic porphyrins usually lack significant absorption above 645 nm (the last Q band, the most promising for use in PDT). Some of the less accessible porphyrinoids (chlorins or bacteriochlorins) are characterized by a more promising UV–vis profile, and new methodologies of glycosylation are being introduced in their chemistry. , In the case of glycoporphyrin chemistry, to the best of our knowledge, the subject of a bathochromic shift introduced by the sugar moiety has not been yet recognized. Herein, we present our studies on the synthesis of C–C-conjugated glycoporphyrins with red-shifted absorption maxima.

Recently, we have reported palladium-catalyzed methodologies toward C–C-linked carbohydrate–porphyrin hybrids. , However, our previous approaches exploited functionalization of porphyrin system through meso-aryl rings. While synthetic simplicity justified this strategy, the aryl rings usually adopt an orthogonal orientation relative to the porphyrin core, which results in no significant changes in the UV–vis profile of such molecules. Herein, we developed the concept of synthetically more challenging, less symmetric trans-A2B2-type porphyrins (Scheme ). Sonogashira reaction on this scaffold has been explored in some recent studies, and changes in the UV–vis profile have been exploited with aromatic substituents. In this paper, we present modified conditions for Sonogashira coupling, allowing for direct glycosylation of the meso position. As a result, C–C-conjugated porphyrins are formed with glycal moieties participating in the porphyrin core-conjugated system leading to red-shifted glycoporphyrins. Additionally, by choosing the MacDonald-type A2B2 porphyrin synthesis strategy, we were able to diversify the scope of porphyrin examples. With that, further functionalization of photosensitizers through functional groups localized at meso substituents is still possible.

1. General Context of the Studies.

1

Two subunits were required in our strategy. We chose glycals as one of the most diverse groups of sugar synthons. The alkynylated glucal derivative (2a) was synthesized following our own protocol starting from iodoglucal 1a, the popular starting material for modern sugar methodologies. To obtain dibromoporphyrin 5a, we have explored some published synthetic paths looking for the most convenient path in terms of economical availability and reproducibility. In the first step (Scheme ), we applied an economic procedure toward dipyrromethane (1). Despite a low yield (24%), the aqueous procedure itself was easy to scale up and used only 3 equiv of excess pyrrole. Next, macrocyclization was conducted with the use of TFA, leading to a trans-A2B2-type porphyrin with a good yield of 58%. Final starting material 5a was synthesized following the bromination protocols with the use of pyridine (and methanol in some cases; see the Supporting Information), leading to dibromoporphyrin 5a with an excellent yield of 99%.

2. Synthesis of Starting Materials.

2

As a starting point of optimization studies toward 6a (for detailed studies, see the Supporting Information), we tried previously developed conditions for meso-aryl glycosylation. However, satisfactory results were achieved neither at the higher temperature nor at room temperature (Table , entries 1 and 2). Both positions differ significantly in electron density and reactivity; therefore, such differences were not surprising. In the next step, we decided to look for milder conditions that better promoted reactivity at the meso position. Indeed, with PdCl2 in a toluene/triethylamine mixture, the cross-coupled product was isolated in a fair yield of 45% (Table , entry 3). We observed slight progress of substrate conversion at 40 °C (entry 4), and the reaction accelerates significantly when the palladium source is changed to a more soluble one in organic solvents. The product is then formed in a very good yield of 75% (entry 4 vs entry 5). We continued the optimization to identify the most optimal ligand and observed that among those tested, BrettPhos provides the highest yield of 82% (entry 5 vs entries 6–8). In a scale-up experiment, we discovered that this yield might be even increased to 91% (minor losses during the purification process). In small scale experiments, another increase in yield might be achieved with an increased concentration of the mixture (entry 9); however, these conditions did not scale up easily and were optimal for 6a solely.

1. Optimization of the Sonogashira Reaction .

graphic file with name ol5c02038_0010.jpg

entry solvent catalyst (equiv) ligand (equiv) temp (°C), time (h) yield of 6a (%)
1 dioxane/Et3N Pd-XPhos-G3 (0.3) XPhos (0.3) 90, 18 0
2 dioxane/Et3N Pd-XPhos-G3 (0.05) XPhos (0.05) 20, 18 traces
3 toluene/Et3N PdCl2 (0.1) XPhos (0.2) 20, 18 45
4 toluene/Et3N PdCl2 (0.1) XPhos (0.2) 40, 18 47
5 toluene/Et3N Pd(OAc)2 (0.1) XPhos (0.2) 40, 3 75
6 toluene/Et3N Pd(OAc)2 (0.1) SPhos (0.2) 40, 3 52
7 toluene/Et3N Pd(OAc)2 (0.1) XantPhos (0.2) 40, 3 70
8 toluene/Et3N Pd(OAc)2 (0.1) BrettPhos (0.2) 40, 3 82 (91)
9 toluene/Et3N Pd(OAc)2 (0.1) BrettPhos (0.2) 40, 3 88
a

General conditions: porphyrin 5a (0.038 mmol, 1.0 equiv), ethynylated glucal 2a (4.0 equiv), TBAF·3H2O (4.1 equiv), copper­(I) iodide (0.1 equiv), toluene (2.5 mL), triethylamine (2.5 mL), argon atmosphere.

b

A 1:1 mixture (v:v).

c

1,4-Dioxane.

d

Reaction without CuI.

e

A 10-fold scale reaction.

f

Toluene (1.25 mL), triethylamine (1.25 mL).

The UV–vis spectrum of 6a confirmed the validity of the initial concept of our studies and proved the participation of the sugar unit in the conjugation with the porphyrin chromophore system. We selected two model porphyrins as the most convenient references: TPP (5,10,15,20-tetraphenyl-porphyrin) and 5,15-diphenyl-10,20-bis­((trimethylsilyl)­ethynyl)-porphyrin (EtDPP; for the synthesis, see the Supporting Information). Glycosylated porphyrin 6a was characterized with red-shifted Q bands absorbing the visible light from the region up to 705 nm (maximum at 691 nm) (Figure ). The lowest energetic local maximum of TPP occurs at 647 nm, while for EtDPP, the Q band is shifted to 678 nm. The additional difference in absorption maxima between 6a and EtDPP proves that the glycal unit participates in the conjugation system and influences the final outcome on UV–vis of the whole hybrid.

1.

1

UV–vis spectra (CHCl3) of 6a in comparison with those of reference porphyrins TPP and EtDPP.

We further challenged our methodology to determine the scope with regard to glycal moieties for two key reasons. First, as we observed conjugation between the sugar residue and macroheterocycle through the ethynyl linker, we expected that the carbohydrate unit itself is probably the only direct factor that might influence the level of the bathochromic shift on UV–vis spectra. Second, considering the final application of our hybrids in PDT and their ultimate interactions with sugar-recognizing cancer lectins, we expected that each PS might have a different affinity for cancer cells. Hence, the library of glycosylated PS might help to determine the most promising sugar units for applications in PDT. In our studies, we exemplified glycoporphyrins by using four different sugar derivatives (d-glucal-, d-galactal-, d-xylal-, and l-rammnal- (6a6d, respectively)) with good overall yields (Scheme ).

3. Differentiation of Sugar Residues.

3

Products 6a6d were characterized with bathochromic shifts of the absorption maxima. Among the glycals tested, the d-galactal moiety seems to adopt the conformation that maximizes the conjugation with the macroheterocycle ring (Figure ). Further development of this phenomenon may create a starting point for new glycosylated PSs.

2.

2

UV–vis spectra (DMF) and comparison of the Q bands (6a6d).

To further challenge our methodology, we decided to test its versatility with regard to the porphyrin scaffold (Scheme ). We created macroheterocycles with different meso-aryl moieties. The included parameters were electron density (5b and 5c), the presence of functional groups (5b and 5f–5h), and the possibility of using heteroaromatic rings (5e). Glycoporphyrins (7b7h) were obtained with overall yields ranging from fair to excellent (31–90%). The main limitation was related to the synthetic accessibility and solubility of dibromoporphyrins (5b5h). Alkyl substituents significantly improve the solubility of the porphyrins, which is crucial for successful cross-coupling. The impact of this factor was particularly visible in comparison of the reactivity of 5h and 5i, and the meta-cyano derivative was soluble enough to provide 7h with an acceptable yield of 31%; on the other hand, only traces of 7i were detected in the reaction mixture of 5i. Last but not least, halogen atoms remaining at macrocycles 7f and 7g might be an interesting starting point for further functionalization and new cross-coupling strategies. As expected, apart from 7e, meso-aryl rings have a negligible influence on the UV–vis spectra of porphyrin systems.

4. Scope with Regard to meso-Aryl Substituents.

4

The final step was exemplified on model glycoporphyrin 6a with our previously reported procedure of hydroxyl group deprotection (Scheme ). Deacetylated product 8a was isolated in a very good yield of 84%, proving the utility of the whole synthetic methodology.

5. Deprotection Step of the Synthesis.

5

To determine the ability of our compounds to produce ROS, we followed a well-established protocol using single-wavelength absorbance measurement with 9,10-dimethylanthracene (DMA) as an indicator of ROS production (Figure ; details in the Supporting Information). To our delight, we observed that both acetylated porphyrins and porphyrins with free hydroxyl groups (6a vs 8a) efficiently generate ROS. Furthermore, we were able to produce ROS using a 690 nm lamp (Figure A) and an even less energetic and more penetrating 740 nm lamp (Figure B, commercial lamp used with about 25% of peak emission at 720 nm). The latter result was particularly impactful as it gives direct proof of glycal’s influence on ROS production in the biologically attractive visible light region. The reference PS (EtDPP) did not induce significant oxidation of DMA under these conditions, while 8a could be used with such a light source.

3.

3

Photooxidation of DMA (300 μM) and PS (18 μM) ((A) λirr = 690 nm and (B) λirr = 740 nm) photosensitized in DMF.

To further study the potential of our compound, we preliminarily estimated the quantum yield of 6a and 8a using a porphyrin reference (TPP in our case). , The samples were irradiated at 550 nm, where both 6a and 8a as well as TPP showed low, yet non-zero absorbance. Other irradiation wavelengths such as ∼425 nm (Soret band for TPP) could not be used due to the bathochromic shift of our compounds, which made it impossible to ensure similar absorbance of the tested samples. In contrary, near 550 nm all tested porphyrins showed similar absorbance, which still allowed for ROS production (Figure ).

4.

4

First-order plots for the photooxidation of DMA (300 μM), photosensitized by TPP, 6a, and 8a in DMF (λirr = 550 nm). Values represent the mean ± standard deviation of three separate experiments. Molarities of PS were adjusted to equalize the absorbance of each sample at 550 nm.

Obtained kinetic data were used to calculate the kinetic parameters and quantum yields of 6a and 8a in DMF by comparing the slope for the PS with that of the reference (TPP (Table )). Our glycoporphyrins showed quantum yields comparable to that of TPP. Further testing is required to confirm this finding, preferably using reference PS with similar wavelengths of absorption maxima, e.g., Foscan.

2. Kinetic Parameters for the Photooxidation of DMA, Including the Observed Rate Constant (k obs) and Singlet Molecular Oxygen Quantum Yield (ΦΔ) in DMF.

  TPP 6a 8a
kDMFobs (s–1) (3.2 ± 0.2) × 10–3 (3.1 ± 0.2) × 10–3 (3.3 ± 0.2) × 10–3
ΦΔ 0.64 0.62 ± 0.04 0.66 ± 0.04

Our studies present a new methodology for hydrolytically stable conjugation between 2-ethynylglycal moieties and A2B2-type porphyrins. Sonogashira reactivity allowed us to combine two subunits via C–C bonds. As a result, 11 new glycoporphyrins were obtained with proven ROS generation capability and impactful spectroscopic features for application in PDT. The observed red-shift of the absorption maxima provides access to promising third-generation PSs.

Supplementary Material

ol5c02038_si_001.pdf (6.4MB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the National Science Centre (Poland; 2023/51/D/ST5/00384).

The data underlying this study are available in the published article, in its Supporting Information, and openly available in the Zenodo database at 10.5281/zenodo.15728134.

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.orglett.5c02038.

  • Experimental procedures and characterizations and UV–vis and NMR spectra (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Steiner, U. E. Fundamentals of Photophysics, Photochemistry and Photobiology; Springer: Berlin, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kwiatkowski S., Knap B., Przystupski D., Saczko J., Kędzierska E., Knap-Czop K., Kotlińska J., Michel O., Kotowski K., Kulbacka J.. Photodynamic Therapy – Mechanisms, Photosensitizers and Combinations. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018;106(July):1098–1107. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.07.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Mariño-Ocampo N., Dibona-Villanueva L., Escobar-Álvarez E., Guerra-Díaz D., Zúñiga-Núñez D., Fuentealba D., Robinson-Duggon J.. Recent Photosensitizer Developments, Delivery Strategies and Combination-based Approaches for Photodynamic Therapy †. Photochem. Photobiol. 2023;99(2):469–497. doi: 10.1111/php.13749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Pham T. C., Nguyen V. N., Choi Y., Lee S., Yoon J.. Recent Strategies to Develop Innovative Photosensitizers for Enhanced Photodynamic Therapy. Chem. Rev. 2021;121(21):13454–13619. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Pereira P. M. R., Rizvi W., Bhupathiraju N. V. S. D. K., Berisha N., Fernandes R., Tomé J. P. C., Drain C. M.. Carbon-1 versus Carbon-3 Linkage of d -Galactose to Porphyrins: Synthesis, Uptake, and Photodynamic Efficiency. Bioconjugate Chem. 2018;29(2):306–315. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.7b00636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Pereira P. M. R., Silva S., Ramalho J. S., Gomes C. M., Girão H., Cavaleiro J. A. S., Ribeiro C. A. F., Tomé J. P. C., Fernandes R.. The Role of Galectin-1 in in Vitro and in Vivo Photodynamic Therapy with a Galactodendritic Porphyrin. Eur. J. Cancer. 2016;68:60–69. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.08.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fujimoto K., Miyata T., Aoyama Y.. Saccharide-Directed Cell Recognition and Molecular Delivery Using Macrocyclic Saccharide Clusters: Masking of Hydrophobicity to Enhance the Saccharide Specificity [19] J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000;122(14):3558–3559. doi: 10.1021/ja993993d. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Singh S., Aggarwal A., Bhupathiraju N. V. S. D. K., Arianna G., Tiwari K., Drain C. M.. Glycosylated Porphyrins, Phthalocyanines, and Other Porphyrinoids for Diagnostics and Therapeutics. Chem. Rev. 2015;115(18):10261–10306. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Parthiban V., Yen P. Y. M., Uruma Y., Lai P. S.. Designing Synthetic Glycosylated Photosensitizers for Photodynamic Therapy. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2020;93(8):978–984. doi: 10.1246/bcsj.20200079. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gangemi C. M. A., Castriciano M. A., D’Agostino E., Romeo A., Bonaccorsi P. M., Barattucci A., Monsù Scolaro L.. Rod-like Nanostructures through Amphiphilic OPE-Porphyrin Self-Organization. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2023;21(40):8079–8083. doi: 10.1039/D3OB01385E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dixon C. F., Nottingham A. N., Lozano A. F., Sizemore J. A., Russell L. A., Valiton C., Newell K. L., Babin D., Bridges W. T., Parris M. R., Shchirov D. V., Snyder N. L., Ruppel J. V.. Synthesis and Evaluation of Porphyrin Glycoconjugates Varying in Linker Length: Preliminary Effects on the Photodynamic Inactivation OfMycobacterium Smegmatis. RSC Adv. 2021;11(12):7037–7042. doi: 10.1039/D0RA10793J. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rosa M., Jędryka N., Skorupska S., Grabowska-Jadach I., Malinowski M.. New Route to Glycosylated Porphyrins via Aromatic Nucleophilic Substitution (SNAr)Synthesis and Cellular Uptake Studies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23(19):11321. doi: 10.3390/ijms231911321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sollert C., Kocsi D., Jane R. T., Orthaber A., Borbas K. E.. C-Glycosylated Pyrroles and Their Application in Dipyrromethane and Porphyrin Synthesis. J. Porphyr. Phthalocyanines. 2021;25(07n08):741–755. doi: 10.1142/S1088424621500723. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wyrȩbek P., Osuch-Kwiatkowska A., Pakulski Z., Jarosz S., Ostrowski S.. The Synthesis of Sugar-Decorated Hydrophilic Porphyrins. J. Porphyr. Phthalocyanines. 2013;17(5):384–391. doi: 10.1142/S1088424613500703. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. de C. da Silva F., Ferreira V. F., De Souza M. C. B. V., Tomé A. C., Neves M. G. P. M. S., Silva A. M. S., Cavaleiro J. A. S.. Synthesis of Glycoporphyrins by Cross-Metathesis Reactions. Synlett. 2008;2008(8):1205–1207. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1072718. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Narumi A., Rachi R., Yamazaki H., Kawaguchi S., Kikuchi M., Konno H., Osaki T., Okamoto Y., Shen X., Kakuchi T., Kataoka H., Nomoto A., Yoshimura T., Yano S.. Maltotriose-Chlorin E6 Conjugate Linked via Tetraethyleneglycol as an Advanced Photosensitizer for Photodynamic Therapy. Synthesis and Antitumor Activities against Canine and Mouse Mammary Carcinoma Cells. ACS Omega. 2021;6(10):7023–7033. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c06316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mal’shakova M. V., Pylina Y. I., Belykh D. V.. Novel Hydrophilic Galactose-Conjugated Chlorin E6 Derivatives for Photodynamic Therapy and Fluorescence Imaging. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2019;29(16):2064–2069. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2019.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Godlewski B., Baran D., de Robichon M., Ferry A., Ostrowski S., Malinowski M.. Sonogashira Cross-Coupling as a Key Step in the Synthesis of New Glycoporphyrins. Org. Chem. Front. 2022;9(9):2396–2404. doi: 10.1039/D1QO01909K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Godlewski B., Malinowski M.. Suzuki-Miyaura Reaction of Glycals with Base-Labile Protecting Groups as a New Route to Glycoporphyrins. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2024;366(13):2956–2966. doi: 10.1002/adsc.202400273. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Morisue M., Ohno N., Saito G., Kawanishi M.. Trimethylsilanolate-Promoted Activation of Alkynyl Trimethylsilanes: Hiyama-Type Sonogashira Cross-Coupling for the Synthesis of Arylene-Ethynylene-Linked Porphyrin Arrays. J. Org. Chem. 2022;87(5):3123–3134. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.1c02879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gielen S., Gómez V. C., Brebels S., Quill T. J., Vanderspikken J., Lutsen L., de la Cruz P., Vandewal K., Langa F., Maes W.. Meso -Ethynyl-Extended Push–Pull Type Porphyrins for near-Infrared Organic Photodetectors. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2022;10(30):10853–10859. doi: 10.1039/D2TC00588C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Marschner S. M., Haldar R., Fuhr O., Wöll C., Bräse S.. Modular Synthesis of Trans-A2B2-Porphyrins with Terminal Esters: Systematically Extending the Scope of Linear Linkers for Porphyrin-Based MOFs. Chem. - A Eur. J. 2021;27(4):1390–1401. doi: 10.1002/chem.202003885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Arsenault G. P., Bullock E., MacDonald S. F.. Pyrromethanes and Porphyrins Therefrom. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1960;82(16):4384–4389. doi: 10.1021/ja01501a066. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ferry A.. Diversity in Glycochemistry through Metal-Catalyzed Reactions. Comptes Rendus. Chim. 2025;28(G1):199–213. doi: 10.5802/crchim.373. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hussain N., Ahmed A., Mukherjee D.. 2-Halo Glycals as “Synthon” for 2- C -Branched Sugar: Recent Advances and Applications in Organic Synthesis. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2020;9(6):882–897. doi: 10.1002/ajoc.202000195. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kinfe H. H.. Versatility of Glycals in Synthetic Organic Chemistry: Coupling Reactions, Diversity Oriented Synthesis and Natural Product Synthesis. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2019;17(17):4153–4182. doi: 10.1039/C9OB00343F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mirabella S., Cardona F., Goti A.. From Glycals to Aminosugars: A Challenging Test for New Stereoselective Aminohydroxylation and Related Methodologies. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2016;14(23):5186–5204. doi: 10.1039/C6OB00649C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Dharuman S., Vankar Y. D.. N -Halosuccinimide/AgNO3-Efficient Reagent Systems for One-Step Synthesis of 2-Haloglycals from Glycals: Application in the Synthesis of 2C-Branched Sugars via Heck Coupling Reactions. Org. Lett. 2014;16(4):1172–1175. doi: 10.1021/ol500039s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Malinowski M., Van Tran T., de Robichon M., Lubin-Germain N., Ferry A.. Mild Palladium-Catalyzed Cyanation of Unprotected 2-Iodoglycals in Aqueous Media as Versatile Tool to Access Diverse C2-Glycoanalogues. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2020;362(5):1184–1189. doi: 10.1002/adsc.201901583. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Juhász-Tóth É., Szilárd Malecz Á., Tóth M., Homolya Á., Kaszás T., Somsák L., Juhász L.. 2-Iodo-1-C-Acceptor-Substituted Glycals: Synthesis and Transformation into 1,2-C,C-Disubstituted Glycals via Suzuki-Miyaura Coupling Reaction. New J. Chem. 2023;47(42):19376–19388. doi: 10.1039/D3NJ03119E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Bordessa A., Ferry A., Lubin-Germain N.. Access to Complex C2-Branched Glycoconjugates via Palladium-Catalyzed Aminocarbonylation Reaction of 2-Iodoglycals. J. Org. Chem. 2016;81(24):12459–12465. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.6b02278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Polák P., Cossy J.. Ni-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling of 2-Iodoglycals and 2-Iodoribals with Grignard Reagents: A Route to 2- C -Glycosides and 2′- C -Nucleosides. Chem. - Eur. J. 2022;28(27):ZZZ. doi: 10.1002/chem.202104311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Malinowski M., Banoun C., de Robichon M., Lubin-Germain N., Ferry A.. Glycosamine Derivatives through Metal-Catalyzed C–N Bond Formation on Protected and Unprotected 2-Iodoglycals. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2021;2021(10):1521–1524. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.202001618. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Monasson O., Malinowski M., Lubin-Germain N., Ferry A.. Hirao Cross-Coupling Reaction as an Efficient Tool to Build Non-Natural C2-Phosphonylated Sugars. Synth. 2022;54(15):3414–3420. doi: 10.1055/a-1709-3305. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Darbem M. P., Esteves H. A., Burrow R. A., Soares-Paulino A. A., Pimenta D. C., Stefani H. A.. Synthesis of Unprotected Glyco-Alkynones: Via Molybdenum-Catalyzed Carbonylative Sonogashira Cross-Coupling Reaction. RSC Adv. 2022;12(4):2145–2149. doi: 10.1039/D1RA08388K. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Soares-Paulino A. A., Stefani H. A.. Synthesis of Diverse C2-Glyco-Acyl Azides and -Ureas by Palladium-Catalyzed Carbonylation Coupling of 2-Iodoglycals. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2020;2020(25):3847–3855. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.202000494. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Al-Shuaeeb R. A. A., Montoir D., Alami M., Messaoudi S.. Synthesis of (1 → 2)-S-Linked Saccharides and S-Linked Glycoconjugates via a Palladium-G3-XantPhos Precatalyst Catalysis. J. Org. Chem. 2017;82(13):6720–6728. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.7b00861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Singhal A., Singh S., Chauhan S. M. S.. Synthesis of Dipyrromethanes in Aqueous Media Using Boric Acid. Arkivoc. 2017;2016(6):144–151. doi: 10.24820/ark.5550190.p009.847. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Gomes A., Fernandes E., Lima J. L. F. C.. Fluorescence Probes Used for Detection of Reactive Oxygen Species. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods. 2005;65(2–3):45–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jbbm.2005.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Sułek A., Pucelik B., Kobielusz M., Barzowska A., Dabrowski J. M.. Photodynamic Inactivation of Bacteria with Porphyrin Derivatives: Effect of Charge, Lipophilicity, Ros Generation, and Cellular Uptake on Their Biological Activity in Vitro. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21(22):8716. doi: 10.3390/ijms21228716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Sarabando S. N., Dias C. J., Vieira C., Bartolomeu M., Neves M. G. P. M. S., Almeida A., Monteiro C. J. P., Faustino M. A. F.. Sulfonamide Porphyrins as Potent Photosensitizers against Multidrug-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA): The Role of Co-Adjuvants. Molecules. 2023;28(5):2067. doi: 10.3390/molecules28052067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Ballatore M. B., Spesia M. B., Milanesio M. E., Durantini E. N.. Synthesis, Spectroscopic Properties and Photodynamic Activity of Porphyrin-Fullerene C60 Dyads with Application in the Photodynamic Inactivation of Staphylococcus Aureus. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2014;83:685–694. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.06.077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Mora S. J., Milanesio M. E., Durantini E. N.. Spectroscopic and Photodynamic Properties of 5,10,15, 20-Tetrakis­[4-(3-n,n- Dimethylaminopropoxy)­Phenyl]­Porphyrin and Its Tetracationic Derivative in Different Media. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2013;270:75–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2013.07.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Venkatesan R., Periasamy N., Srivastava T. S.. Singlet Molecular Oxygen Quantum Yield Measurements of Some Porphyrins and Metalloporphyrins. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. - Chem. Sci. 1992;104(6):713–722. doi: 10.1007/BF02839117. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Bhaumik J., Weissleder R., McCarthy J. R.. Synthesis and Photophysical Properties of Sulfonamidophenyl Porphyrins as Models for Activatable Photosensitizers. J. Org. Chem. 2009;74(16):5894–5901. doi: 10.1021/jo900832y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ol5c02038_si_001.pdf (6.4MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying this study are available in the published article, in its Supporting Information, and openly available in the Zenodo database at 10.5281/zenodo.15728134.


Articles from Organic Letters are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES