Abstract
BACKGROUND: In its 1993 report the Canadian Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies challenged the effectiveness of in vitro fertilization for severe male infertility. To address the Commission's concern, the authors compared the relative effectiveness of in vitro fertilization combined with intracytoplasmic sperm injection for severe male infertility and conventional in vitro fertilization for complete tubal occlusion in women. METHODS: This historical cohort study was done at the PROCREA Fertility Centre, a private tertiary human reproduction centre in Montreal. Three groups of infertile couples were compared: 122 couples with severe male infertility treated by in vitro fertilization with intracytoplasmic injection of fresh sperm from ejaculate (group 1); 27 couples with obstructive azoospermia treated by in vitro fertilization with intracytoplasmic injection of epididymal sperm (collected by microepididymal or percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration) (group 2); and 98 couples with tubal factor infertility (bilateral tubal occlusion) treated with conventional in vitro fertilization (with sperm from ejaculate) (group 3). The main outcomes measured were rates of fertilization, pregnancy, clinical pregnancy and implantation. RESULTS: Pregnancy rates per started cycle were 35%, 40% and 34% for groups 1, 2 and 3 respectively. When prognostic factors were controlled for, none of the outcome measures differed significantly between the 3 groups. INTERPRETATION: In vitro fertilization with intracytoplasmic injection of sperm from the ejaculate or the epididymis is as effective for treating severe male infertility as conventional in vitro fertilization is for treating complete occlusion of the fallopian tubes in women.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (310.4 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Jansen R. P. Relative infertility: modeling clinical paradoxes. Fertil Steril. 1993 May;59(5):1041–1045. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55925-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pagidas K., Falcone T., Hemmings R., Miron P. Comparison of reoperation for moderate (stage III) and severe (stage IV) endometriosis-related infertility with in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 1996 Apr;65(4):791–795. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58215-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pagidas K., Hemmings R., Falcone T., Miron P. The effect of antisperm autoantibodies in male or female partners undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 1994 Aug;62(2):363–369. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56892-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Palermo G., Joris H., Devroey P., Van Steirteghem A. C. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet. 1992 Jul 4;340(8810):17–18. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)92425-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rigot J. M., Lafitte J. J., Dumur V., Gervais R., Manouvrier S., Biserte J., Mazeman E., Roussel P. Cystic fibrosis and congenital absence of the vas deferens. N Engl J Med. 1991 Jul 4;325(1):64–65. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199107043250116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shrivastav P., Nadkarni P., Wensvoort S., Craft I. Percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration for obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod. 1994 Nov;9(11):2058–2061. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Steptoe P. C., Edwards R. G. Birth after the reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet. 1978 Aug 12;2(8085):366–366. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(78)92957-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van Steirteghem A. C., Nagy Z., Joris H., Liu J., Staessen C., Smitz J., Wisanto A., Devroey P. High fertilization and implantation rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1993 Jul;8(7):1061–1066. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Kooij R. J., Looman C. W., Habbema J. D., Dorland M., te Velde E. R. Age-dependent decrease in embryo implantation rate after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1996 Nov;66(5):769–775. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58634-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]