Skip to main content
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology (London, England) logoLink to Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology (London, England)
. 2025 Jul 31;20:23. doi: 10.1186/s12995-025-00472-7

Burnout and coping mechanisms among Sudanese healthcare workers during the ongoing Sudan war: a cross-sectional study

Muhannad Bushra Masaad Ahmed 1, Ahmed Balla M Ahmed 2,, Salma Alrawa 2, Ludn Emad Ebrahim Mustafa 3, Mahmoud Elsadig Mahmoud Ali 4, Mohammed Osman Omer Abdalla 5, Sohaib Mohammed Mokhtar Ahmed 1
PMCID: PMC12312341  PMID: 40745609

Abstract

Background

During the Sudan war, healthcare workers have encountered extraordinary challenges, including physical assaults and the immense strain of delivering care with critically limited resources. These conditions are likely to intensify burnout among healthcare professionals. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of burnout among Sudanese healthcare workers and investigate the coping mechanisms they employ during the ongoing conflict.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted among Sudanese healthcare workers using the standardized Maslach Burnout Inventory – Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS). Multivariable linear regression analysis was conducted to identify independent predictors of burnout domains. A significance level of p < 0.05 was considered for all statistical tests.

Results

High emotional exhaustion was reported by 13.7% of participants, while 56.5% experienced high depersonalization, and only 4.4% reported low levels of personal accomplishment. The leading coping mechanism was talking with friends and family, adopted by 28.8% of participants, while 15.5% turned to spiritual or religious practices.

Conclusion

Sudanese healthcare workers demonstrate high levels of burnout, particularly in the depersonalization domain, with talking to friends and family being the most commonly used coping mechanism. Future research is needed to explore the unique stressors faced by healthcare workers in conflict-affected settings like ours.

Keywords: Burnout, MBI-HSS, Healthcare workers, Coping mechanisms, Sudan, War

Background

On April 15th, 2023, violent clashes erupted between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF), plunging Sudan into a devastating conflict. This war has resulted in the displacement of over 12.5 million people, including internally displaced persons (IDPs), asylum seekers, and refugees [1]. The health infrastructure has been severely crippled, with the World Health Organization (WHO) reporting that 70% of public and private healthcare facilities in war-affected states were forced to close by the end of 2023 [2]. The violence has also directly targeted medical personnel, with more than 200 documented violations against healthcare workers, including the killing of 38 staff members. Incidents of kidnapping, assault, and intimidation have created an atmosphere of fear, leading to a critical shortage of healthcare workers as many have fled or refused to work due to safety concerns [3].

Living under wartime conditions, characterized by constant risk, uncertainty, and extreme suffering, exacerbates the loss of personal and professional resources. Such conditions are known to accelerate burnout processes in occupational settings and have long-term detrimental effects on mental health [4]. Burnout, a syndrome resulting from unmanaged chronic workplace stress, is characterized by three key dimensions: feelings of energy depletion or exhaustion, increased mental distance from one’s job (often manifested as negativism or cynicism), and reduced professional efficacy [5]. Among healthcare workers, burnout not only undermines individual well-being but also compromises the functioning of the entire healthcare system. It is associated with an increased risk of medical errors, reduced patient safety, and lower patient satisfaction, as well as higher rates of complaints from patients and their families [6].

Even prior to the current conflict, studies had already highlighted significant levels of burnout among Sudanese healthcare professionals. One study among resident physicians reported that 70.7% experienced high emotional exhaustion, while 44.2% showed high levels of depersonalization [7]. Likewise, during the COVID-19 pandemic, 45.7% of healthcare workers were found to be experiencing burnout [8]. These findings underscore the pre-existing vulnerabilities and psychological strain within Sudan’s healthcare workforce. Since the outbreak of the war, healthcare workers in Sudan have faced unprecedented challenges, including physical attacks, accusations of partisanship, and the overwhelming burden of providing care with severely limited resources in the few remaining functional hospitals [9]. These conditions are likely to exacerbate burnout and further deteriorate the mental health of healthcare workers, creating a vicious cycle that undermines both their well-being and the quality of care they can provide.

Studies from conflict-affected low- and middle-income countries have reported high levels of burnout among healthcare workers. For instance, a study among Palestinian health professionals during ongoing political violence found a burnout prevalence of 72.9%, with 44.2% experiencing emotional exhaustion and 9.8% reporting depersonalization [10]. However, no studies to date have assessed burnout among healthcare workers in Sudan during the current war. Therefore, this study aims to assess the prevalence of burnout among Sudanese healthcare workers and explore the coping mechanisms they employ to navigate these extraordinary circumstances.

Methods

Study design

This cross-sectional study was conducted in November 2024. It included healthcare workers from various healthcare facilities in the safest states of Sudan. The findings and methodology of this study were meticulously reported in the manuscript in accordance with the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines.

Study population

The study included healthcare professionals, defined as individuals directly involved in patient care and healthcare delivery, such as physicians, nurses, technicians, pharmacists, and allied health staff, aged 18 years or older. Eligible participants had been employed at their current facility for at least one month to ensure they had adequate exposure to the work environment and stressors necessary for a meaningful assessment of burnout. Participation required written informed consent and completion of the study questionnaire. Exclusions included incomplete or inconsistent responses, those on long-term leave during data collection, and individuals previously diagnosed with mental health conditions such as anxiety or depression, as well as those receiving medications or therapy for any mental health issues.

Sampling

We estimated the sample size using the Cochrane formula, given the unavailability of official population records of healthcare workers in Sudan. Assuming a population proportion of 50%, a margin of error of 5%, and a confidence interval of 95%, the minimum sample size required was calculated to be 385 participants. Ultimately, 563 healthcare workers participated in the study.

Convenience sampling was employed due to the challenges in accessing official healthcare workers records. Data collection was conducted through a combination of face-to-face interviews and an online survey administered via Google Forms. Trained medical students carried out the interviews in a confidential setting to promote honest and accurate responses while safeguarding participants’ privacy. They received prior instruction to ensure ethical conduct, accuracy, and consistency throughout the process. The online survey was shared among healthcare workers using widely used social media platforms in Sudan, such as WhatsApp, Telegram, and Facebook. Participation was entirely voluntary, anonymous, and without any form of compensation.

Study instrument

The study employed a comprehensive tool comprising two sections, 13 questions in the socio-demographic section, covering age, sex, marital status, residence, displacement status, job roles, years of experience, exposure to conflict, living situation, access to basic necessities, access to mental health support, type of healthcare facility, and coping mechanisms. The second section of the questionnaire utilized the Maslach Burnout Inventory– Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS), which is the most widely accepted and commonly used tool for assessing burnout. It has been previously used in published research conducted in Sudan [7]. The MBI-HSS consists of 22 items divided into three domains: emotional exhaustion (6 items), depersonalization (8 items), and personal accomplishment (8 items) [11]. Each item was scored on a 7-point frequency scale (0 = Never to 6 = Every day). Emotional exhaustion scores were categorized as low (≤ 16), moderate [17–26], and high (≥ 27). Depersonalization scores were classified as low (≤ 6), moderate [7–12], and high (≥ 13). Personal accomplishment scores were categorized inversely, with low (≥ 39), moderate [32–38], and high (≤ 31) indicating higher levels of burnout. This study relied on the primary definition of burnout, as cited by previous studies [12, 13], which considers individuals with either high emotional exhaustion (≥ 27) or high depersonalization (≥ 13) as experiencing burnout. The MBI-HSS was administered in English, as it is the primary language used in Sudanese hospitals and among healthcare professionals [14].

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 27. Descriptive statistics—means, standard deviations, frequencies, and percentages—were used to summarize demographic characteristics, burnout scores, and coping strategies. Multivariable linear regression analysis was conducted to identify independent predictors of burnout domains. All demographic and contextual variables identified a priori from existing literature (e.g., age, sex, job role, exposure to conflict, access to necessities) were simultaneously entered into the model. No variable selection procedures (e.g., stepwise regression) were applied. Significance was defined at p < 0.05 for all tests.

Result

Demographic factors

The study sample consisted of 563 participants, with a mean age of 27.9 years (SD = 6.3). The majority of the participants were female (61.1%), and most were single (77.8%). In terms of work experience, 43.5% had less than 1 year of experience and 4.1% had more than 15 years of experience. Regarding exposure to conflict situations, 19.5% reported no exposure, while 3.2% had extreme exposure. The majority of participants (70%) were living with family during the conflict with 16.2% lived alone. Access to basic necessities varied, with 23.1% having fully sufficient resources and 5.9% having extremely insufficient resources. 28.4% had access to psychological services, while 71.6% did not. In terms of healthcare facilities, most participants were affiliated with public hospitals (72.8%) while 21.2% worked in private hospitals. Finally, job roles varied, with physicians making up 64.3% of the participants, followed by technicians (10.5%) and pharmacists (10.1%) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Socio-demographic characteristics

 Variable Overall (N = 563)  Variable Overall (N = 563)
Age Years of Work Experience
Mean (SD) 27.9 (6.3) Less than 1 year 245 (43.5%)
Sex 1–5 years 218 (38.7%)
 Female 344 (61.1%) 6–10 years 58 (10.3%)
 Male 219 (38.9%) 11–15 years 19 (3.4%)
Marital Status More than 15 years 23 (4.1%)
 Single 438 (77.8%) Exposure to Conflict Situations
 Married 116 (20.6%) None 110 (19.5%)
 Divorced 6 (1.1%) Minimal 148 (26.3%)
 Widowed 3 (0.5%) Moderate 193 (34.3%)
Residence High 94 (16.7%)
 Blue Nile State 3 (0.5%) Extreme 18 (3.2%)
 Darfour Region 1 (0.2%) Living Situation during Conflict
 East Kordofan 1 (0.2%) Alone 91 (16.2%)
 Gadarif 143 (25.4%) In shared accommodation with colleagues 78 (13.9%)
 Gezira 25 (4.4%) With family 394 (70.0%)
 Kassala 49 (8.7%) Access to Basic Necessities (Medical, Food, Supplies)
 Khartoum 36 (6.4%) Fully sufficient 130 (23.1%)
 North Kordofan 5 (0.9%) Mostly sufficient 199 (35.3%)
 Northern State 71 (12.6%) Insufficient but manageable 201 (35.7%)
 Red Sea State 58 (10.3%) Extremely insufficient 33 (5.9%)
 River Nile State 82 (14.6%) Access to Mental Health Support
 Sennar State 21 (3.7%) Yes (Psychologist, counselor, etc.) 160 (28.4%)
 South Kordofan 1 (0.2%) No 403 (71.6%)
 White Nile State 67 (11.9%) Type of Healthcare Facility
Internally displaced persons (IDPs) Public Hospital 409 (72.8%)
 Yes 362 (64.3%) Private Hospital 119 (21.2%)
 No 201 (35.7%) Community Pharmacy 11 (2.0%)
Job Role Private Pharmacy 6 (1.1%)
 Physician 362 (64.3%) Non-governmental organization (NGO)/Relief Organization 19 (3.4%)
 Technician 59 (10.5%)
 Pharmacist 57 (10.1%)
 Nurse 37 (6.6%)
 Medical laboratory 23 (4.1%)
 Administrative staff 14 (2.5%)
 Dentist 11 (2.0%)

Burnout

The burnout domains revealed varied experiences across healthcare workers. Emotional exhaustion was reported by 68.0% of participants as low, 18.3% as moderate, and 13.7% as high. Depersonalization had a higher percentage, with 56.5% of participants experiencing high depersonalization. Personal accomplishment was high for 90.9% of participants (Table 2).

Table 2.

Burnout domains (MBI-HSS)

Burnout Domain Mean (SD) Range Low Moderate High
Emotional Exhaustion 12.5 (10.4) 0.0–36.0 383 (68.0%) 103 (18.3%) 77 (13.7%)
Depersonalization 15.2 (11.5) 0.0–48.0 157 (27.9%) 88 (15.6%) 318 (56.5%)
Personal Accomplishment 11.7 (11.2) 0.0–48.0 25 (4.4%) 26 (4.6%) 512 (90.9%)

Regression analysis revealed several significant predictors across the three burnout dimensions. For emotional exhaustion, individuals with 1–5 years of work experience reported significantly higher scores compared to those with less than 1 year (β = 2.28, p = 0.026). Living in shared accommodation with colleagues during the conflict (β = 4.76, p = 0.003) and having insufficient but manageable access to basic necessities (β = 4.42, p < 0.001) were also associated with higher emotional exhaustion. Additionally, participants with extreme exposure to conflict had significantly elevated emotional exhaustion scores (β = 5.32, p = 0.043). Higher depersonalization scores were observed among participants with 1–5 years of work experience compared to those with less than 1 year (β = 2.35, p = 0.042), as well as among those with extreme conflict exposure (β = 8.26, p = 0.005) and insufficient but manageable access to basic necessities (β = 2.78, p = 0.043). Conversely, lower depersonalization scores were reported by those who had no access to mental health support (β = − 2.16, p = 0.048). For personal accomplishment, fewer predictors reached significance; however, participants reporting insufficient but manageable basic necessities had higher scores (β = 3.91, p = 0.004), and those with mostly sufficient access also showed slightly elevated scores (β = 2.62, p = 0.047). Other sociodemographic variables such as age, sex, marital status, and job role did not significantly predict burnout outcomes across the three domains (Table 3).

Table 3.

Adjusted associations between demographic/contextual factors and MBI subscale scores (Multivariable linear regression)

Predictor Emotional Exhaustion
(β [95% CI], p)
Depersonalization
(β [95% CI], p)
Personal Accomplishment
(β [95% CI], p)
IDPs (Ref: No)
 Yes 1.41 [−0.40, 3.23], 0.127 –0.93 [–2.97, 1.11], 0.369 –0.82 [–2.83, 1.18], 0.421
Age 0.07 [–0.15, 0.28], 0.532 –0.05 [–0.29, 0.20], 0.711 –0.03 [–0.27, 0.20], 0.780
Sex (Ref: Female)
 Male –0.83 [–2.63, 0.97], 0.367 1.09 [–0.93, 3.12], 0.290 –0.91 [–2.90, 1.09], 0.374
Marital Status (Ref: Single)
 Married –0.21 [–2.64, 2.23], 0.869 –1.17 [–3.91, 1.57], 0.402 0.19 [–2.51, 2.89], 0.889
 Divorced 6.35 [–2.00, 14.69], 0.136 5.43 [–3.95, 14.81], 0.256 2.89 [–6.35, 12.14], 0.539
 Widowed –2.15 [–14.34, 10.04], 0.729 –6.54 [–20.24, 7.17], 0.349 –5.46 [–18.96, 8.05], 0.428
Job Role (Ref: Physician)
 Technician –3.40 [–6.21, − 0.60], 0.017 –0.76 [–3.91, 2.39], 0.637 –1.84 [–4.94, 1.27], 0.246
 Pharmacist 2.31 [–0.64, 5.26], 0.124 2.99 [–0.33, 6.30], 0.077 1.90 [–1.36, 5.17], 0.253
 Nurse –0.99 [–4.56, 2.58], 0.586 3.68 [–0.33, 7.69], 0.072 1.65 [–2.30, 5.60], 0.413
 Lab Staff –3.40 [–7.73, 0.93], 0.124 2.15 [–2.71, 7.02], 0.385 –1.62 [–6.41, 3.18], 0.508
 Admin Staff –0.96 [–6.40, 4.47], 0.727 5.64 [–0.47, 11.74], 0.070 4.15 [–1.87, 10.17], 0.176
 Dentist 0.66 [–5.43, 6.75], 0.832 –2.54 [–9.39, 4.30], 0.466 0.63 [–6.11, 7.38], 0.854
Work Experience (Ref: <1 year)
 1–5 years 2.28 [0.27, 4.29], 0.026 2.35 [0.09, 4.61], 0.042 0.41 [–1.82, 2.63], 0.719
 6–10 years –0.06 [–3.46, 3.33], 0.971 1.22 [–2.60, 5.03], 0.532 0.98 [–2.78, 4.74], 0.609
 11–15 years 0.82 [–4.75, 6.39], 0.772 –2.22 [–8.48, 4.04], 0.486 –3.21 [–9.38, 2.96], 0.308
 > 15 years –2.21 [–8.00, 3.57], 0.453 –0.41 [–6.92, 6.09], 0.901 0.27 [–6.14, 6.69], 0.933
Conflict Exposure (Ref: None)
 Minimal 1.43 [–1.11, 3.98], 0.269 1.40 [–1.46, 4.26], 0.338 0.72 [–2.10, 3.54], 0.615
 Moderate 1.50 [–0.99, 3.99], 0.236 1.78 [–1.02, 4.57], 0.213 1.79 [–0.97, 4.54], 0.203
 High 2.13 [–0.86, 5.11], 0.162 2.04 [–1.32, 5.39], 0.233 2.68 [–0.62, 5.99], 0.111
 Extreme 5.32 [0.16, 10.49], 0.043 8.26 [2.46, 14.06], 0.005 4.67 [–1.05, 10.39], 0.109
Living Situation (Ref: Alone)
 Shared accommodation with colleagues 4.76 [1.68, 7.85], 0.003 3.51 [0.04, 6.97], 0.047 3.06 [–0.35, 6.48], 0.079
 With family 0.69 [–1.69, 3.06], 0.569 1.96 [–0.71, 4.63], 0.150 2.39 [–0.24, 5.02], 0.075
Access to Basic Necessities (Ref: Fully sufficient)
 Mostly sufficient 3.12 [0.79, 5.46], 0.009 1.82 [–0.80, 4.44], 0.173 2.62 [0.03, 5.20], 0.047
 Insufficient (manageable) 4.42 [2.03, 6.82], < 0.001 2.78 [0.09, 5.48], 0.043 3.91 [1.25, 6.56], 0.004
 Extremely insufficient 2.70 [–1.22, 6.63], 0.176 3.77 [–0.64, 8.18], 0.093 3.70 [–0.64, 8.05], 0.095
Mental Health Support (Ref: Yes)
 No 0.46 [–1.44, 2.37], 0.633 –2.16 [–4.30, − 0.02], 0.048 –0.35 [–2.46, 1.76], 0.746

Note: Bold values indicate statistically significant results (p < 0.05)

Coping mechanisms

The coping mechanisms employed by participants in response to stress and challenges are diverse, as illustrated in Fig. 1. The most commonly used coping strategy is talking to friends or family, reported by 28.8% of participants. Other prominent methods include spiritual or religious practices (15.5%), which help individuals navigate difficult situations, and reduced medical effectiveness (14.8%), highlighting a coping method linked to compromised health care delivery. Professional mental health support is used by 12.3% of participants, while physical activity or exercise is another coping mechanism, favored by 12.0%.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Coping mechanisms among participants

Discussion

Burnout among healthcare workers can impair clinical decision-making, hinder effective communication with patients and colleagues, and reduce their capacity to manage work-related stress [15]. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of burnout among Sudanese healthcare workers and explore the coping strategies they use amid the ongoing conflict.

The ongoing Sudanese military conflict has severely impacted healthcare services due to infrastructure destruction and a critical shortage of health workers [16]. The WHO has verified 88 attacks on healthcare resulting in 55 deaths and 104 injuries [17]. Incidents of killing, kidnapping, and assault have worsened the shortage of healthcare staff [3]. This is further exacerbated by shortage of medications and equipment [18, 19] and outbreaks of diseases like cholera and dengue [20, 21]. These factors likely contribute to the high levels of burnout among healthcare workers in Sudan. It has been suggested that there is an interaction between burnout and secondary traumatic stress in the Middle East [22].

Depersonalization was the most affected in our study, followed by emotional exhaustion and, finally, personal accomplishment, with only 4.4% reporting low levels of personal accomplishment. This aligns with findings from other countries [23, 24]. Notably, the proportion of participants experiencing depersonalization in our study was higher than that reported among healthcare workers in Gaza during their war [25]. These findings suggest that physicians in conflict-affected settings have a strong sense of self accomplishment, however factors like the workload, staff shortage, and working environment cause emotional exhaustion and depersonalization leading to high levels of burnout. Depersonalization and emotional exhaustion are considered the core components of burnout, whereas reduced personal accomplishment may act as either a precursor or an outcome of the syndrome [26]. The particularly high levels of depersonalization observed may indicate a psychological coping mechanism, whereby healthcare workers detach emotionally from their patients as a way to shield themselves from chronic stress [26]. In settings like Sudan, where prolonged trauma exposure and critical resource limitations are common, this emotional distancing can serve as a necessary—though potentially harmful—adaptation to survive in a highly strained and unsupportive healthcare environment.

Nearly two-thirds of the participants in this study were internally displaced. Sudan has the largest displacement crisis, more than 11 million internally displaced people [27]. There was no significant association between displacement status and burnout domains in this study. Less than one-fifth of participants had more than five years of experience, which may reflect the characteristics of healthcare practitioners remaining in Sudan during the war. Senior physicians are more likely to find jobs abroad to support their families, while younger physicians, who lack training, are more likely to stay. This pattern may also reflect differences in social media use and availability, as younger physicians are more likely to complete online questionnaires. These plausible explanations require further investigations to obtain robust evidence. Burnout levels varied by years of experience, with early-career professionals (1–5 years) showing significantly higher emotional exhaustion and depersonalization. This finding is consistent with previous studies that have reported greater burnout among those with fewer years of experience [28, 29].

Nurses were more likely to report depersonalization compared to physicians; however, this difference was not statistically significant. A study conducted among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic found that Sudanese physicians were more likely to report burnout compared to nurses. A plausible explanation for this finding is the heavier workload and frontline role of physicians during COVID-19. This contrasts with findings from other studies that report higher levels of burnout among nurses [30, 31]. Some studies, however, report no significant difference between the two groups [32]. Technicians were significantly less likely to experience emotional exhaustion compared to physicians, a difference that may also be attributed to workload.

Less than a quarter of participants reported having fully sufficient access to basic necessities. This is consistent with the general situation in war-torn Sudan, where one in every three people is at risk of food insecurity [33]. Insufficient but manageable access to basic necessities was significantly associated with high levels of emotional exhaustion and depersonalization. A probable explanation is that the affected access domain is financial, which can be managed by working longer hours in multiple hospitals. This year, food prices have increased by more than 120% [34].

More than two-thirds of participants reported a lack of access to psychological support. The expertise of mental health and psychological support groups is fragmented, and there is no shared platform to coordinate priority actions or strengthen responses to mental health needs [35].

Participants with extreme conflict exposure showed significantly higher levels of emotional exhaustion and depersonalization. Similarly, a study conducted among academic staff in Ukraine found that prolonged stress related to the ongoing war led to notable increases in depersonalization [36]. Despite the severe impact of the war, many conflict-related variables in our study were not significantly associated with burnout in our adjusted models. One possible explanation is that the conflict affected nearly all healthcare workers in some way, creating a uniformly high baseline of stress and reducing detectable differences across exposure levels. Additionally, the effects of the war may have manifested more through indirect stressors, such as economic hardship, longer working hours, and lack of basic resources, which were better captured by other variables like access to necessities and living arrangements.

The most commonly reported coping mechanisms were talking to friends and families as well as spiritual or religious practices. Previous studies have found that social relationships may help in managing the effects of burnout [37, 38]. Additionally, religious practices are regarded as protective and beneficial in managing burnout [39, 40]. A previous study conducted among displaced individuals in shelters in Port Sudan highlighted the significant role of religious and spiritual practices—such as prayer, reading the Quran, and trusting in God—in coping with distress. The study also emphasized the importance of social and emotional support, noting that individuals often leaned on family ties and built supportive social relationships to manage their circumstances [41]. These coping strategies may reflect the strong communal and religious values embedded in Sudanese culture, where individuals often rely on close-knit family networks and faith during times of crisis. In the context of limited access to formal mental health services during the conflict, these culturally rooted mechanisms may serve as essential substitutes, helping individuals manage stress and emotional exhaustion.

This study offers valuable insights into burnout among healthcare providers in a conflict-affected country. A notable strength is the inclusion of participants from various professional roles within the healthcare system. However, the interpretation of the findings should consider several limitations. The cross-sectional design restricts the ability to draw causal inferences. Moreover, the use of a non-probability sampling technique may limit the generalizability of the results. Participants’ responses may have been influenced by recall bias and the tendency to provide socially desirable answers. Additionally, the disproportionate distribution of participants across healthcare roles—with physicians comprising approximately two-thirds of the sample—may affect the representativeness and limit the generalizability of the findings to the broader population of healthcare workers.

Conclusion

Healthcare workers in Sudan exhibit a high level of burnout mainly in the depersonalization domain. However, the most commonly used coping mechanisms include talking to friends and family, as well as engaging in spiritual or religious practices. There is a need for context-specific research into the unique stressors faced by healthcare workers in conflict-affected settings like ours. In addition, healthcare workers should receive targeted training on evidence-based strategies to manage and prevent burnout.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

MBI-HSS

Maslach Burnout Inventory– Human Services Survey

SAF

Sudanese Armed Forces

RSF

Rapid Support Forces

IDPs

Internally displaced persons

WHO

World Health Organization

STROBE

Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology

NGO

Non-governmental organization

Authors’ contributions

“All authors participated in the conceptualization and design of the study. MBMA, LEEM, MEMA, and MOOA were responsible for data collection. SMMA conducted the data analysis and drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to the manuscript writing process. ABMA reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final draft of the manuscript.”

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Data availability

“The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.”

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was obtained from Gadarif University’s Medical Research Ethics Committee (Ref. No.: GU/FM/REC/Q3.10.24.4). The study adhered to the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki, ensuring respect for participants’ rights and dignity. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants after a detailed explanation of the study’s purpose, with participants given the freedom to withdraw from the study at any time.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

“The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.”


Articles from Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology (London, England) are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES