Skip to main content
PMC home page
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 2000 Jun 27;162(13):1815–1820.

Effectiveness of massage therapy for subacute low-back pain: a randomized controlled trial

M Preyde 1
PMCID: PMC1231369  PMID: 10906914

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of massage therapy for low-back pain has not been documented. This randomized controlled trial compared comprehensive massage therapy (soft-tissue manipulation, remedial exercise and posture education), 2 components of massage therapy and placebo in the treatment of subacute (between 1 week and 8 months) low-back pain. METHODS: Subjects with subacute low-back pain were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 groups: comprehensive massage therapy (n = 25), soft-tissue manipulation only (n = 25), remedial exercise with posture education only (n = 22) or a placebo of sham laser therapy (n = 26). Each subject received 6 treatments within approximately 1 month. Outcome measures obtained at baseline, after treatment and at 1-month follow-up consisted of the Roland Disability Questionnaire (RDQ), the McGill Pain Questionnaire (PPI and PRI), the State Anxiety Index and the Modified Schober test (lumbar range of motion). RESULTS: Of the 107 subjects who passed screening, 98 (92%) completed post-treatment tests and 91 (85%) completed follow-up tests. Statistically significant differences were noted after treatment and at follow-up. The comprehensive massage therapy group had improved function (mean RDQ score 1.54 v. 2.86-6.5, p < 0.001), less intense pain (mean PPI score 0.42 v. 1.18-1.75, p < 0.001) and a decrease in the quality of pain (mean PRI score 2.29 v. 4.55-7.71, p = 0.006) compared with the other 3 groups. Clinical significance was evident for the comprehensive massage therapy group and the soft-tissue manipulation group on the measure of function. At 1-month follow-up 63% of subjects in the comprehensive massage therapy group reported no pain as compared with 27% of the soft-tissue manipulation group, 14% of the remedial exercise group and 0% of the sham laser therapy group. INTERPRETATION: Patients with subacute low-back pain were shown to benefit from massage therapy, as regulated by the College of Massage Therapists of Ontario and delivered by experienced massage therapists.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (271.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blanchard E. B., Andrasik F., Neff D. F., Arena J. G., Ahles T. A., Jurish S. E., Pallmeyer T. P., Saunders N. L., Teders S. J., Barron K. D. Biofeedback and relaxation training with three kinds of headache: treatment effects and their prediction. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1982 Aug;50(4):562–575. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.50.4.562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bray G. A. Definition, measurement, and classification of the syndromes of obesity. Int J Obes. 1978;2(2):99–112. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cawley N. A critique of the methodology of research studies evaluating massage. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 1997 Mar;6(1):23–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.1997.tb00265.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cherkin D. C., Deyo R. A., Battié M., Street J., Barlow W. A comparison of physical therapy, chiropractic manipulation, and provision of an educational booklet for the treatment of patients with low back pain. N Engl J Med. 1998 Oct 8;339(15):1021–1029. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199810083391502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DeCoster C., Carriere K. C., Peterson S., Walld R., MacWilliam L. Waiting times for surgical procedures. Med Care. 1999 Jun;37(6 Suppl):JS187–JS205. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199906001-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Deyo R. A. Measuring the functional status of patients with low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988 Dec;69(12):1044–1053. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ernst E. Massage therapy for low back pain: a systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1999 Jan;17(1):65–69. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(98)00129-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Goldstein J. C., Waterhouse N. J., Juin P., Evan G. I., Green D. R. The coordinate release of cytochrome c during apoptosis is rapid, complete and kinetically invariant. Nat Cell Biol. 2000 Mar;2(3):156–162. doi: 10.1038/35004029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Goldstein J. C., Waterhouse N. J., Juin P., Evan G. I., Green D. R. The coordinate release of cytochrome c during apoptosis is rapid, complete and kinetically invariant. Nat Cell Biol. 2000 Mar;2(3):156–162. doi: 10.1038/35004029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hart J. D. Failure to complete treatment for headache: a multiple regression analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1982 Oct;50(5):781–782. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.50.5.781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hsieh C. Y., Phillips R. B., Adams A. H., Pope M. H. Functional outcomes of low back pain: comparison of four treatment groups in a randomized controlled trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1992 Jan;15(1):4–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hyytiäinen K., Salminen J. J., Suvitie T., Wickström G., Pentti J. Reproducibility of nine tests to measure spinal mobility and trunk muscle strength. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1991;23(1):3–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jenkinson T. R., Mallorie P. A., Whitelock H. C., Kennedy L. G., Garrett S. L., Calin A. Defining spinal mobility in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The Bath AS Metrology Index. J Rheumatol. 1994 Sep;21(9):1694–1698. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Koes B. W., Assendelft W. J., van der Heijden G. J., Bouter L. M. Spinal manipulation for low back pain. An updated systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996 Dec 15;21(24):2860–2873. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199612150-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lee A., Don B., Goldacre M. J. Waiting list statistics. II: An estimate of inflation of waiting list length. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987 Nov 7;295(6607):1197–1198. doi: 10.1136/bmj.295.6607.1197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Loney P. L., Stratford P. W. The prevalence of low back pain in adults: a methodological review of the literature. Phys Ther. 1999 Apr;79(4):384–396. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mackillop W. J., Groome P. A., Zhang-Solomons J., Zhou Y., Feldman-Stewart D., Paszat L., Dixon P., Holowaty E. J., Cummings B. J. Does a centralized radiotherapy system provide adequate access to care? J Clin Oncol. 1997 Mar;15(3):1261–1271. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.3.1261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. McCreary C., Turner J., Dawson E. Principal dimensions of the pain experience and psychological disturbance in chronic low back pain patients. Pain. 1981 Aug;11(1):85–92. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(81)90141-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Melzack R., Vetere P., Finch L. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for low back pain. A comparison of TENS and massage for pain and range of motion. Phys Ther. 1983 Apr;63(4):489–493. doi: 10.1093/ptj/63.4.489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Moll J. M., Wright V. Normal range of spinal mobility. An objective clinical study. Ann Rheum Dis. 1971 Jul;30(4):381–386. doi: 10.1136/ard.30.4.381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Patrick D. L., Deyo R. A., Atlas S. J., Singer D. E., Chapin A., Keller R. B. Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with sciatica. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995 Sep 1;20(17):1899–1909. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199509000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pope M. H., Phillips R. B., Haugh L. D., Hsieh C. Y., MacDonald L., Haldeman S. A prospective randomized three-week trial of spinal manipulation, transcutaneous muscle stimulation, massage and corset in the treatment of subacute low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994 Nov 15;19(22):2571–2577. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199411001-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Prieto E. J., Hopson L., Bradley L. A., Byrne M., Geisinger K. F., Midax D., Marchisello P. J. The language of low back pain: factor structure of the McGill pain questionnaire. Pain. 1980 Feb;8(1):11–19. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(80)90086-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Roland M., Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1983 Mar;8(2):141–144. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198303000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sobolev B., Brown P., Zelt D., Shortt S. Bias inherent in retrospective waiting-time studies: experience from a vascular surgery waiting list. CMAJ. 2000 Jun 27;162(13):1821–1822. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Weinberg C. R., Baird D. D., Rowland A. S. Pitfalls inherent in retrospective time-to-event studies: the example of time to pregnancy. Stat Med. 1993 May 15;12(9):867–879. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780120906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. van Tulder M. W., Koes B. W., Bouter L. M. Conservative treatment of acute and chronic nonspecific low back pain. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of the most common interventions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997 Sep 15;22(18):2128–2156. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199709150-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES