Abstract
Background
The emerging pathogenic species Aspergillus lentulus, within the Aspergillus fumigatus complex, poses a significant threat to patient health owing to its high rates of drug resistance and mortality. The aim of this study was to characterize the intraspecies morphology, virulence, and in vitro antifungal susceptibility of A. lentulus.
Methods
We cultured A. lentulus isolates from different sources (three clinical isolates and one environmental isolate), along with A. fumigatus (n=1) and Aspergillus fumigatiaffinis (n=1), to observe colony color, diameter, sporulation timing, and spore production. Virulence was assessed using a Galleria mellonella infection model, and survival curves were generated to evaluate strain pathogenicity. Antifungal susceptibility was determined using the colorimetric microdilution method with Sensititre YeastOne® panels.
Results
Compared to A. fumigatus and A. fumigatiaffinis, A. lentulus exhibited whitish colonies with pale green overtones, delayed sporulation initiation, and reduced spore yield. The four A. lentulus isolates showed intrastrain variability in the timing of colony color transition, growth rates, sporulation onset, and spore quantification. Virulence experiments demonstrated that all A. lentulus isolates successfully infected G. mellonella larvae and exhibited concentration- and time-dependent survival patterns. Clinical isolates consistently showed significantly lower larval survival rates than the environmental isolates at all infection concentrations. Antifungal susceptibility testing revealed the following minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ranges for A. lentulus: posaconazole 0.5–2 μg/mL, itraconazole 1–2 μg/mL, and voriconazole 2–8 μg/mL. Specifically, the clinical isolate A. lentulus-10199 and environmental isolate A. lentulus-10201 exhibited elevated voriconazole MICs (8 μg/mL). All strains demonstrated high MICs for amphotericin B (≥4 μg/mL) and caspofungin (≥8 μg/mL).
Conclusion
Aspergillus lentulus exhibited both interstrain and intrastrain variations in growth rate and sporulation characteristics. Clinical isolates demonstrated greater virulence potential than environmental isolates. Aspergillus lentulus displayed favorable susceptibility to posaconazole but reduced susceptibility to voriconazole, amphotericin B, and caspofungin.
Keywords: Aspergillus lentulus, virulence, antifungal susceptibility testing, azole, Aspergillus fumigatus complex
Introduction
Invasive fungal infections pose a severe threat to human health and are related to an estimated annual global mortality rate of 3.75 million people. Aspergillus fumigatus remains one of the primary pathogens causing invasive aspergillosis, which results in an alarming mortality rate of up to 50%.1–3 The complexity of antifungal treatment and patient mortality significantly increases when infections are caused by azole-resistant strains or accompanied by delayed and missed diagnoses.
Molecular taxonomic studies have revealed that A. fumigatus actually constitutes a multispecies complex (the A. fumigatus complex),4,5 comprising species such as A. fumigatus, A. lentulus, A. fumisynnematus, A. fumigatiaffinis, Neosartorya fischeri, and A. novofumigatus.5 Among these, A. lentulus was first identified through molecular characterization in 20056 and has since been reported in multiple countries, including China.7–15 However, biological characteristics and pathogenicity data for this species remain limited.
Existing studies demonstrate that, compared to A. fumigatus sensu stricto, A. lentulus typically exhibits white colonies with pale green hues, delayed sporulation, small columnar conidial heads, and the ability to produce ascospores (sexual reproductive structures),16 while being unable to grow at temperatures >48°C.6 Aspergillus lentulus and A. fumigatus can be distinguished rapidly by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) and surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF-MS).17,18 Clinical reports indicate that A. lentulus primarily infects immunocompromised patients, causing invasive pulmonary aspergillosis.7–15 The high mortality rate associated with A. lentulus infections is hypothesized to correlate with host immunosuppression, strain virulence, and drug resistance.7 However, conflicting evidence exists: some studies using G. mellonella infection models report significantly lower virulence levels than A. fumigatus,19,20 while others observe intraspecific virulence variations among A. lentulus.21 Clinical data confirm reduced susceptibility of A. lentulus to most antifungals, particularly azoles.6,7,22,23 Studies have confirmed that the mechanism of azole resistance in Aspergillus is mainly point mutations or overexpression in the CYP51A gene, and tandem repeat (TR) mutations in the promoter region.24,25 Non-CYP51A mutant azole-resistant strains are mainly related to the overexpression of the efflux pump ABC transporter.26 Notably, previous research has focused exclusively on clinical isolates, neglecting environmental strains. There is a need to increase vigilance regarding threats to human health posed by A. lentulus originating from natural environments, enhancing clinical and laboratory alertness to A. lentulus infection. Therefore, this study investigated four A. lentulus (clinical and environmental) isolates, along with A. fumigatus and A. fumigatiaffinis from the A. fumigatus complex. Through a comparative analysis of the morphological characteristics, virulence profiles, and antifungal susceptibility patterns, we aimed to comprehensively elucidate the biological features and pathogenic mechanisms of A. lentulus.
Materials and Methods
Strains
The strain details are listed in Table 1. The test strains included A. lentulus (clinical strain, n=3; environmental strain, n=1), A. fumigatus (n=1), and A. fumigatiaffinis (n=1). Prior to this study, all of the strains were identified using molecular biology methods to amplify the partial β-tubulin gene and sequence it. Among them, A. lentulus-10198 was isolated from the sputum of a patient with chronic obstructive emphysema and named A. lentulus PWCAL1 or 2429-Palide, we submitted this strain to the DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ, http://www.ddbj.nig.ac.jp/default.htm) with accession number LC187284. A. spergillus lentulus-10199, A. lentulus-10200, and A. lentulus-10201 were provided by the Medical Mycology Research Center of Chiba University, Japan.
Table 1.
Strain Information on Aspergillus in this Study (n=6)
| Species | Number in This Study | Original Number | Origin | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. lentulus | 10198 | PWCAL1=2429-Palide | Xinjiang, China | Patient sputum |
| A. lentulus | 10199 | IFM62135 | Japan | Patient sputum |
| A. lentulus | 10200 | IFM54703/ATCC MYA-3566 | Japan | Patient sputum |
| A. lentulus | 10201 | IFM62627 | Japan | Soil |
| A. fumigatus | – | – | Xinjiang, China | Patient sputum |
| A. fumigatiaffinis | – | – | Xinjiang, China | Patient sputum |
Colony Color, Growth Rate, and Sporulation Time
Strains were cultured on 9 cm potato dextrose agar (PDA) plates at 27°C for 14 days. Colony diameter was measured daily, and color changes were observed. The colony diameter was measured using the average of two perpendicular diameters. Fungal immunofluorescence staining and microscopic examination were used to assess the sporulation time and spore quantity for each strain, and count the number of spores per field to evaluate total spores. Each experiment was independently repeated three times, and the results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
Galleria Mellonella Infection and Survival Curve
Galleria mellonella larvae were purchased from Huiyude Biotechnology Co. Ltd (Tianjin, China). Larvae exhibiting creamy-colored cuticles, active motility, and 7-day-old larvae were selected and maintained in a 37°C incubator in the dark for 24 h prior to infection. The test strains comprised both clinical (n=3) and environmental (n=1) A. lentulus. The strains were cultured on PDA medium at 27°C for 7 days to promote adequate sporulation. Colonies were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to elute spores, and fungal suspensions were filtered through glass wool to remove hyphae. Spore concentrations were adjusted to 1×104, 1×105, and 1×106 conidia/mL using a hemocytometer. For each concentration, 20 larvae were inoculated by injecting 40 µL of spore suspension into the right proleg using a microsyringe. The control larvae were treated with PBS only. After infection, the larvae were incubated at 37°C in the dark, and survival was monitored daily for 7 days.
In Vitro Antifungal Susceptibility Testing
Antifungal susceptibility was determined using the Sensititre YeastOne® kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Four A. lentulus strains were tested against three classes of antifungal agent: (a) polyenes (amphotericin B); (b) azoles (itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, fluconazole); and (c) echinocandins (caspofungin). Final concentration ranges were: amphotericin B (0.12–8 µg/mL), caspofungin/voriconazole/posaconazole (0.008–8 µg/mL), itraconazole (0.015–16 µg/mL), and fluconazole (0.125–256 µg/mL). Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were interpreted using epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) for filamentous fungi according to the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (M27, M38, M44, M51, M57) and European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) 2022 guidelines. CLSI ECVs (µg/mL) for A. fumigatus were as follows: amphotericin B (2), itraconazole (1), caspofungin (0.5), and voriconazole (≤0.5 susceptible, 1 intermediate, ≥2 resistant). EUCAST ECVs (µg/mL) were as follows: amphotericin B (1), itraconazole (1), posaconazole (0.25), and voriconazole (1). Candida krusei ATCC 6258 was used as the quality control strain. The inoculated plates were incubated at 35°C for 48 h before MIC determination.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 24.0. Intergroup comparisons were made using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Statistical significance was set at a p-value of 0.05.
Results
Colony Color
During the first 4 days of cultivation, all four A. lentulus strains exhibited white colonies (Figure 1 and Table 2). Notably, A. lentulus-1019 and A. lentulus-10201 developed a whitish-green coloration on days 5 and 6, respectively, whereas A. lentulus-10199 and A. lentulus-10200 turned whitish-green on days 9 and 10, respectively. The timing of the color transition of A. fumigatiaffinis was similar to that of A. lentulus (Table 2). With prolonged growth, colonies of both A. lentulus and A. fumigatiaffinis remained predominantly white. In contrast, A. fumigatus showed the earliest color change, displaying whitish-green colonies by day 3 and fully developing a smoky-green hue by day 8.
Figure 1.
Colony characteristics of Aspergillus lentulus and control strains. (A) Colony characteristics of A. lentulus, PDA, 28°C, front. (B) Colony characteristics of A. lentulus, PDA, 28°C, reverse. (C) Colony characteristics of control strains, PDA, 28°C, front. (D) Colony characteristics of control strains, PDA, 28°C, reverse.
Table 2.
Colony Color Changes After Culture of Different Aspergillus Strains
| Species | Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 | Day 4 | Day 5 | Day 6 | Day 7 | Day 8 | Day 9 | Day 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. lentulus-10198 | White | White | White | White | White/green | White/green | White/green | White/green | White/green | White/green |
| A. lentulus-10199 | White | White | White | White | White | White | White | White | White/green | White/green |
| A. lentulus-10200 | White | White | White | White | White | White | White | White | White | White/green |
| A. lentulus-10201 | White | White | White | White | White | White/green | White/green | White/green | White/green | White/green |
| A. fumigatus | White | White | White | White/green | White/green | White/green | White/green | Smoky green | Smoky green | Smoky green |
| A. fumigatiaffinis | White | White | White | White | White | White | White/green | White/green | White/green | White/green |
Growth Rate
As illustrated in Figure 2, on PDA medium after 1 week of cultivation, the colony diameters of three A. lentulus strains (A. lentulus-10198, A. lentulus-10200, and A. lentulus-10201) reached 7.5 cm, whereas A. lentulus-10199 measured 5.0 cm. Aspergillus fumigatiaffinis colonies grew to 3.2 cm after 1 week and to only 4.8 cm after 2 weeks.
Figure 2.
Aspergillus lentulus and control strains were cultured on PDA at 28°C for 2 weeks, and the growth diameters of colonies of different strains were observed.
Sporulation Time
Among the four A. lentulus strains, A. lentulus-10199 and A. lentulus-10201 began sporulation on day 5, A. lentulus-10198 on day 7, and A. lentulus-10200 on day 12 (Figure 3). In comparison, the control strain of A. fumigatus initiated sporulation on day 2, and A. fumigatiaffinis on day 4.
Figure 3.
Aspergillus lentulus and control strains were cultured on PDA at 28°C, and spore production time and quantity were measured.
Galleria Mellonella Survival Curve Analysis
Larvae infected with the four A. lentulus strains showed increased mortality at higher fungal inoculum doses (Figure 4). At the highest dose (106 conidia/mL), the average 7-day mortality rates were 77.86%, 65.0%, 29.0%, and 0%, respectively. At the lowest dose (104 conidia/mL), the respective rates were 60.7%, 0%, 2.14%, and 0%. The A. lentulus-10198 clinical strain caused 70–90% larval mortality by day 2 at doses of 104–106 conidia/mL. At the highest dose, A. lentulus-10198, A. lentulus-10199, and A. lentulus-10200 induced 90%, 75%, and 100% mortality by day 7, with mortality rates of 70%, 0%, and 5%, respectively. In contrast, the A. lentulus-10201 environmental strain caused no larval mortality at any dose within 7 days.
Figure 4.
Aspergillus lentulus clinical strain (10198, 10199, 10200) and environmental strain (10201) killed Galleria mellonella larvae at 104, 105, and 106 conidia/mL, and infected larvae for 7 consecutive days. The larvae mortality was dose dependent. The larvae were inoculated with PBS as a control.
In Vitro Antifungal Susceptibility
As shown in Table 3, the MIC ranges of five antifungal agents against the four A. lentulus were as follows: caspofungin ≥8 μg/mL, amphotericin B ≥4 μg/mL, posaconazole 0.5–2 μg/mL, itraconazole 1–2 μg/mL, and voriconazole 2–8 μg/mL. The MIC values of A. lentulus for three major classes of antifungal agents all exceeded the ECV of A. fumigatus, indicating reduced susceptibility or resistance.
Table 3.
Results of the Sensitivity Test to Antifungal Drugs In Vitro by Aspergillus Lentulus and Control Strains (MIC μg/mL)
| Species Drug |
PZ | VOR | IZ | CAS | AB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. lentulus-10198 | 0.5 | 2 | 1 | ≥8 | ≥4 |
| A. lentulus-10199 | 0.5 | 8 | 1 | ≥8 | ≥4 |
| A. lentulus-10200 | 1 | 2 | 1 | ≥8 | ≥4 |
| A. lentulus-10201 | 2 | 8 | 2 | ≥8 | ≥4 |
| A. fumigatiaffinis | 0.5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | ≥8 |
| A. fumigatus | 0.015 | 0.03 | 0.015 | 0.008 | 0.25 |
Discussion
The mortality rate for invasive aspergillosis can be as high as 60%. When first-line treatments such as voriconazole and isavuconazole are administered, the mortality rate drops to approximately 20–30%. For refractory invasive aspergillosis, combination therapy with different classes of antifungal drugs is particularly important.
Although most pathogenic Aspergillus species are phenotypically distinguishable, infections can also be caused by phylogenetically related species that morphologically resemble A. fumigatus,27 which may underlie refractory invasive aspergillosis. Key differences among these species lie in colony growth, stability of sporulation, conidial surface markers, and maximum growth temperature.5 Within the A. fumigatus complex, A. lentulus, A. fumigatus, and A. fumigatiaffinis exhibited morphological similarities. However, A. lentulus and A. fumigatiaffinis colonies predominantly displayed a white coloration over extended growth periods, which may be correlated with their slower sporulation rates and poor conidiation. Specifically, A. lentulus strains demonstrated delayed and reduced sporulation, with the A. lentulus-10200 strain observed to have only one spore in the full-field view of the microscope by day 11. In contrast, the control strain A. fumigatus exhibited rapid and abundant sporulation, highlighting the interspecific and intraspecific variations in sporulation dynamics. Aspergillus fumigatus displayed the fastest growth, followed by A. lentulus, whereas A. fumigatiaffinis grew the most slowly, showing a significant divergence from the other two species. For A. fumigatiaffinis, we only observed its slowest growth on PDA medium. Our findings indicate that colony color, sporulation patterns, and growth rates may serve as morphological criteria for distinguishing A. lentulus from A. fumigatus and A. fumigatiaffinis. Although A. lentulus was initially regarded as a sibling species of A. fumigatus, phylogenetic analyses based on DNA sequencing and phenotypic traits have revealed substantial divergence between A. lentulus and A. fumigatus.21 Both A. lentulus and A. fumigatiaffinis are recently identified species, with phenotypic analyses indicating close similarities between them,21 a finding corroborated by our study. Therefore, routine implementation of fungal culture along with morphological and molecular biological identification of fungal species in the laboratory is essential for ensuring accurate clinical diagnosis and successful treatment.
Given the functional parallels between the innate immune systems of G. mellonella larvae and mammals,28,29 we employed a G. mellonella model to assess A. lentulus virulence. All clinical A. lentulus isolates successfully infected larvae, with survival rates varying according to inoculum concentration and infection duration. The clinical isolates exhibited markedly higher virulence than the environmental isolates, suggesting intraspecific virulence heterogeneity. Among the three clinical strains, A. lentulus-10198 was isolated from the sputum of a COPD patient. The patient died after unsuccessful antifungal treatment following a diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. The G. mellonella survival curve showed that A. lentulus-10198 demonstrated the strongest virulence, inducing 70–90% mortality at 104–106 conidia/mL by day 2 post-inoculation, compared to 0–70% and 0–45% for the A. lentulus-10199 and A. lentulus-10200 strains, respectively. The final mortality rates across concentrations ranged from 70–90%, 0–75%, 5–100%, and 0% for the environmental strain, A. lentulus-10201, showing negligible virulence (0% mortality). However, the relationship between A. lentulus virulence and its strain origin remains unclear. In rodent models, A. fumigatus environmental isolates exhibited lower virulence than their clinical counterparts.30 Similarly, Alshareef and Robson reported higher virulence in clinical A. fumigatus isolates (n=10) than in environmental strains (n=20) in G. mellonella, alongside substantial intrasource variability.31 Our findings align with these trends, demonstrating enhanced virulence in clinical A. lentulus isolates. However, conflicting studies exist: Cheema and Christians observed lower survival in larvae infected with environmental A. fumigatus isolates (n=8) compared to clinical strains (n=8),32 while Knox et al reported greater virulence in environmental A. fumigatus strains from the International Space Station using a zebrafish model.33 Dos Santos et al further documented significant interspecies and intraspecies virulence heterogeneity among A. lentulus (n=6), A. fumigatus (n=6), and A. fumigatiaffinis (n=4) in G. mellonella, with survival rates at day 10 ranging from 0% to >75%.21 Our results concur, underscoring intraspecific virulence variability in A. lentulus.
In vitro antifungal susceptibility testing plays a critical role in guiding precise medication and fungal resistance surveillance. Aspergillus lentulus is notable for high MICs to all azoles and amphotericin B,6,34,35 although one study reported susceptibility to isavuconazole (MIC 0.25 μg/mL).36 In our study, four A. lentulus strains exhibited low MICs to posaconazole (0.5–2 μg/mL), suggesting the potential efficacy of less clinically utilized antifungals. Voriconazole MICs (2–8 μg/mL) exceeded those of itraconazole (1–2 μg/mL), implying reduced voriconazole activity. However, conflicting reports exist, with some strains showing higher itraconazole MICs.37 Clinical breakpoints for A. lentulus remain undefined. Extrapolation from A. fumigatus criteria classifies A. lentulus as azole resistant, mediated by CYP51 mutations.38 Notably, our environmental A. lentulus isolate displayed elevated MICs to voriconazole (8 μg/mL), itraconazole (2 μg/mL), and posaconazole (2 μg/mL), surpassing clinical strains. A study by Watanabe et al identified azole-resistant A. lentulus (MICs ≥4 mg/L to voriconazole) in Japanese environments,39 while Colosi et al isolated a Romanian vineyard strain resistant to itraconazole (8 mg/L), voriconazole (4 mg/L), and posaconazole (4 mg/L).40 The prevalence and mechanisms of environmental azole resistance in A. lentulus remain unclear.
Conclusion
This study delineated the phenotypic, virulence, and antifungal susceptibility profiles of A. lentulus within the A. fumigatus complex, thereby offering critical insights for clinical diagnosis and management. Limitations include a small sample size, necessitating expanded strain collection and deeper mechanistic investigations. Because of the general decrease in sensitivity of A. lentulus to azoles, more attention should be paid to the mechanism of azole resistance.
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge funding from the Xinjiang Nature Science Foundation of China (2021D01E30) and the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region’s Tianshan Talents Medical and Health High-level Talent Training Program for the Young and Middle-aged Talent Project (TSYC202301B029). We would like to thank all participants in this study.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by a grant from the Xinjiang Nature Science Foundation of China (grant number: 2021D01E30) and the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region’s Tianshan Talents Medical and Health High-level Talent Training Program for the Young and Middle-aged Talent Project (TSYC202301B029).
Ethics Statement
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The clinical samples in this study were acquired as part of the routine hospital laboratory procedure.
Author Contributions
All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Disclosure
The authors declare no conflicts of interest in this work.
References
- 1.Lamoth F, Calandra T. Pulmonary aspergillosis: diagnosis and treatment. Eur Respir Rev. 2022;31(166):220114. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0114-2022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Imbert S, Cassaing S, Bonnal C, et al. Invasive aspergillosis due to Aspergillus cryptic species: a prospective multicentre study. Mycoses. 2021;64(11):1346–1353. doi: 10.1111/myc.13348 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.L R, Ninan MM, Kurien R, et al. Cryptic aspergillosis: a rare entity and a diagnostic challenge. Access Microbiol. 2022;4(4):000344. doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.000344 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Imbert S, Normand AC, Cassaing S, et al. Multicentric Analysis of the Species Distribution and Antifungal Susceptibility of Cryptic Isolates from Aspergillus Section Fumigati. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020;64(12):e01374–20. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01374-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lamoth F. Aspergillus fumigatus-Related Species in Clinical Practice. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:683. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00683 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Balajee SA, Gribskov JL, Hanley E, Nickle D, Marr KA. Aspergillus lentulus sp. nov. a new sibling species of A. fumigatus. Eukaryot Cell. 2005;4(3):625–632. doi: 10.1128/EC.4.3.625-632.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yu SY, Guo LN, Xiao M, et al. Clinical and Microbiological Characterization of Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis Caused by Aspergillus lentulus in China. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:1672. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01672 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ahmed J, Singh G, Xess I, et al. Emerging Aspergillus lentulus infections in India. Ind J Med Microbiol. 2022. 40(1):160–162. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmmb.2021.10.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lysková P, Skružná M, Kubánek M, et al. Cryptic Aspergillus species-a case report of chronic cavitary pulmonary Aspergillus lentulus infection in a heart transplant recipient. Klin Mikrobiol Infekc Lek. 2019;25(2):48–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhang Y, Wang S, Zhou C, et al. Epidemiology of Clinically Significant Aspergillus Species from a Large Tertiary Hospital in Shanghai, China, for the Period of Two Years. Infect Drug Resist. 2023;16:4645–4657. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S417840 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yagi K, Ushikubo M, Maeshima A, et al. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis due to Aspergillus lentulus in an adult patient: a case report and literature review. J Infect Chemother. 2019;25(7):547–551. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2019.02.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bastos VR, Santos DW, Padovan AC, et al. Early invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in a kidney transplant recipient caused by Aspergillus lentulus: first Brazilian report. Mycopathologia. 2015;179(3–4):299–305. doi: 10.1007/s11046-014-9840-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Prigitano A, Esposto MC, Grancini A, et al. Azole resistance in Aspergillus isolates by different types of patients and correlation with environment - An Italian prospective multicentre study (ARiA study). Mycoses. 2021;64(5):528–536. doi: 10.1111/myc.13241 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Shivasabesan G, Logan B, Brennan X, et al. Disseminated Aspergillus lentulus Infection in a Heart Transplant Recipient: a Case Report. Clin Infect Dis. 2022;75(7):1235–1238. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac205 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mortensen KL, Johansen HK, Fuursted K, et al. A prospective survey of Aspergillus spp. in respiratory tract samples: prevalence, clinical impact and antifungal susceptibility. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011;30(11):1355–1363. doi: 10.1007/s10096-011-1229-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Swilaiman SS, O’Gorman CM, Balajee SA, Dyer PS. Discovery of a sexual cycle in Aspergillus lentulus, a close relative of A. fumigatus. Eukaryot Cell. 2013;12(7):962–969. doi: 10.1128/EC.00040-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Verwer PE, van Leeuwen WB, Girard V, et al. Discrimination of Aspergillus lentulus from Aspergillus fumigatus by Raman spectroscopy and MALDI-TOF MS. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;33(2):245–251. doi: 10.1007/s10096-013-1951-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pinel C, Arlotto M, Issartel JP, et al. Comparative proteomic profiles of Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillus lentulus strains by surface-enhanced laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF-MS). BMC Microbiol. 2011;11:172. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-11-172 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhang LJ, Wang XD, Ji MS, et al. Characterisation of a clinical isolated Aspergillus lentulus strain using a Galleria mellonella infection model. J Thorac Dis. 2021;13(2):803–811. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-961 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Alcazar-Fuoli L, Mellado E, Alastruey-Izquierdo A, Cuenca-Estrella M, Rodriguez-Tudela JL. Aspergillus section Fumigati: antifungal susceptibility patterns and sequence-based identification. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52(4):1244–1251. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00942-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dos Santos RAC, Steenwyk JL, Rivero-Menendez O, et al. Genomic and Phenotypic Heterogeneity of Clinical Isolates of the Human Pathogens Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus lentulus, and Aspergillus fumigatiaffinis. Front Genet. 2020;11:459. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00459 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rivero-Menendez O, Soto-Debran JC, Medina N, Lucio J, Mellado E, Alastruey-Izquierdo A. Molecular Identification, Antifungal Susceptibility Testing, and Mechanisms of Azole Resistance in Aspergillus Species Received within a Surveillance Program on Antifungal Resistance in Spain. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63(9):e00865–19. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00865-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.van der Linden JW, Arendrup MC, Warris A, et al. Prospective multicenter international surveillance of azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21(6):1041–1044. doi: 10.3201/eid2106.140717 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Garcia-Rubio R, Cuenca-Estrella M, Mellado E. Triazole Resistance in Aspergillus Species: an Emerging Problem. Drugs. 2017;77(6):599–613. doi: 10.1007/s40265-017-0714-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Dladla M, Gyzenhout M, Marias G, Ghosh S. Azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus-comprehensive review. Arch Microbiol. 2024;206(7):305. doi: 10.1007/s00203-024-04026-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Fraczek MG, Bromley M, Buied A, et al. The cdr1B efflux transporter is associated with non-cyp51a-mediated itraconazole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013;68(7):1486–1496. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt075 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Frisvad JC, Larsen TO. Extrolites of Aspergillus fumigatus and Other Pathogenic Species in Aspergillus Section Fumigati. Front Microbiol. 2016;6:1485. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01485 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Durieux MF, Melloul É, Jemel S, et al. Galleria mellonella as a screening tool to study virulence factors of Aspergillus fumigatus. Virulence. 2021;12(1):818–834. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2021.1893945 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mendoza Barker M, Saeger S, Campuzano A, et al. Galleria mellonella Model of Coccidioidomycosis for Drug Susceptibility Tests and Virulence Factor Identification. J Fungi. 2024;10(2):131. doi: 10.3390/jof10020131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Amarsaikhan N, O’Dea EM, Tsoggerel A, et al. Isolate-dependent growth, virulence, and cell wall composition in the human pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus. PLOS ONE. 2014;9(6):e100430. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100430 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Alshareef F, Robson GD. Genetic and virulence variation in an environmental population of the opportunistic pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus. Microbiology. 2014;160(Pt 4):742–751. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.072520-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cheema MS, Christians JK. Virulence in an insect model differs between mating types in Aspergillus fumigatus. Med Myco. 2011;49(2):202–207. doi: 10.3109/13693786.2010.512301 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Knox BP, Blachowicz A, Palmer JM, et al. Characterization of Aspergillus fumigatus Isolates from Air and Surfaces of the International Space Station. mSphere. 2016;1(5):e00227–16. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00227-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Escribano P, Gómez A, Reigadas E, et al. In vitro activity of olorofim against Aspergillus fumigatus sensu lato clinical isolates: activity is retained against isolates showing resistance to azoles and/or amphotericin B. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022;28(9):1291.e7–1291.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.05.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nematollahi S, Permpalung N, Zhang SX, et al. Aspergillus lentulus: an Under-recognized Cause of Antifungal Drug-Resistant Aspergillosis. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021;8(8):ofab392. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab392 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Datta K, Rhee P, Byrnes III E, et al. Isavuconazole activity against Aspergillus lentulus, Neosartorya udagawae, and Cryptococcus gattii, emerging fungal pathogens with reduced azole susceptibility. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51(9):3090–3093. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01190-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Tamiya H, Ochiai E, Kikuchi K, et al. Secondary metabolite profiles and antifungal drug susceptibility of Aspergillus fumigatus and closely related species, Aspergillus lentulus, Aspergillus udagawae, and Aspergillus viridinutans. J Infect Chemother. 2015;21(5):385–391. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2015.01.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Tateno M, Umeyama T, Inukai T, et al. Examination of Cyp51A-Mediated Azole Resistance in Aspergillus lentulus Using CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing. Med Mycol J. 2022;63(2):27–35. doi: 10.3314/mmj.21-00024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Watanabe K, Yaguchi T, Hirose D. Ubiquitous Distribution of Azole-Resistant Aspergillus fumigatus- Related Species in Outdoor Environments in Japan. Med Mycol J. 2021;62(4):71–78. doi: 10.3314/mmj.21-00014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Colosi HA, Baciu AM, Costache C, et al. Prevalence of Azole-Resistant Aspergillus Section Fumigati Strains Isolated from Romanian Vineyard Soil Samples. Antibiotics. 2023;12(12):1695. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12121695 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]




