Skip to main content
Journal of Anatomy logoLink to Journal of Anatomy
. 1976 Sep;122(Pt 1):43–59.

Sperm-egg interactions in the pig: monospermy, extensive polyspermy, and the formation of chromatin aggregates.

R H Hunter
PMCID: PMC1231930  PMID: 988013

Abstract

The process of incorporation and metamorphosis of the sperm head within the vitellus has been examined by phase-contrast microscopy in a large series of pig eggs exhibiting either normal monospermic fertilization or extensive polyspermy. This latter condition was induced in vivo after increasing the numbers of capacitated spermatozoa in the Fallopian tubes by pre-ovulatory surgical insemination. Attention was drawn in monospermic eggs to the initial fusion between the spermatozoon and vitelline surface which produced a characteristic constriction in the equatorial region of the head. Immediately following cytoplasmic contact with the sperm nucleus, an increase in size was detectable in this structure, remnants of the inner acrosomal membrane having apparently been displaced during incorporation. In fixed preparations of activated eggs, there was some evidence that the morphologically transformed sperm nucleus underwent a brief period of shrinkage before commencing pronuclear formation. The most striking feature of the polyspermic condition was the number of spermatozoa that had entered the vitellus (2 to greater than 80), and the formation of aggregates of sperm head chromatin in eggs penetrated by more than 20-30 spermatozoa; the heads of at least 8 or 9 spermatozoa could participate in the formation of such an aggregate. Various unusual configurations were noted during breakdown of the midpiece in polyspermic eggs, and degeneration was also a general feature of the cytoplasm in situations of excessive polyspermy. Aspects of the block to polyspermy are discussed, and it is inferred that highly polyspermic pig eggs can still exhibit a zona reaction.

Full text

PDF
43

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AUSTIN C. R., BRADEN A. W. H. Passage of the sperm and the penetration of the egg in mammals. Nature. 1952 Nov 29;170(4335):919–921. doi: 10.1038/170919a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. AUSTIN C. R. Cortical granules in hamster eggs. Exp Cell Res. 1956 Apr;10(2):533–540. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(56)90025-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BRADEN A. W., AUSTIN C. R., DAVID H. A. The reaction of zona pellucida to sperm penetration. Aust J Biol Sci. 1954 Aug;7(3):391–409. doi: 10.1071/bi9540391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BRADEN A. W., AUSTIN C. R. The number of sperms about the eggs in mammals and its significance for normal fertilization. Aust J Biol Sci. 1954 Nov;7(4):543–551. doi: 10.1071/bi9540543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. BRADEN A. W. Distribution of sperms in the genital tract of the female rabbit after coitus. Aust J Biol Sci. 1953 Nov;6(4):693–705. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Barros C., Bedford J. M., Franklin L. E., Austin C. R. Membrane vesiculation as a feature of the mammalian acrosome reaction. J Cell Biol. 1967 Sep;34(3):C1–C5. doi: 10.1083/jcb.34.3.c1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Barros C., Yanagimachi R. Induction of zona reaction in golden hamster eggs by cortical granule material. Nature. 1971 Sep 24;233(5317):268–269. doi: 10.1038/233268a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Barros C., Yanagimachi R. Polyspermy-preventing mechanisms in the golden hamster egg. J Exp Zool. 1972 May;180(2):251–265. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401800211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bedford J. M. The influence of oestrogen and progesterone on sperm capacitation in the reproductive tract of the female rabbit. J Endocrinol. 1970 Feb;46(2):191–200. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.0460191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bedford J. M. Ultrastructural changes in the sperm head during fertilization in the rabbit. Am J Anat. 1968 Sep;123(2):329–358. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001230207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. CHANG M. C., PINCUS G. Physiology of fertilization in mammals. Physiol Rev. 1951 Jan;31(1):1–26. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1951.31.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Day B. N., Polge C. Effects of progesterone on fertilization and egg transport in the pig. J Reprod Fertil. 1968 Oct;17(1):227–230. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0170227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gwatkin R. B., Williams D. T., Hartmann J. F., Kniazuk M. The zona reaction of hamster and mouse eggs: production in vitro by a trypsin-like protease from cortical granules. J Reprod Fertil. 1973 Feb;32(2):259–265. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0320259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hunter R. H. Chronological and cytological details of fertilization and early embryonic development in the domestic pig, Sus scrofa. Anat Rec. 1974 Feb;178(2):169–185. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091780203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hunter R. H., Dziuk P. J. Sperm penetration of pig eggs in relation to the timing of ovulation and insemination. J Reprod Fertil. 1968 Mar;15(2):199–208. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0150199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hunter R. H. Fertilization in the pig: sequence of nuclear and cytoplasmic events. J Reprod Fertil. 1972 Jun;29(3):395–406. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0290395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hunter R. H., Hall J. P. Capacitation of boar spermatozoa: synergism between uterine and tubal environments. J Exp Zool. 1974 May;188(2):203–213. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401880208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hunter R. H., Hall J. P. Capacitation of boar spermatozoa: the influence of post-coital separation of the uterus and fallopian tubes. Anat Rec. 1974 Dec;180(4):597–603. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091800406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hunter R. H. Local action of progesterone leading to polyspermic fertilization in pigs. J Reprod Fertil. 1972 Dec;31(3):433–444. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0310433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hunter R. H., Polge C. Maturation of follicular oocytes in the pig after injection of human chorionic gonadotrophin. J Reprod Fertil. 1966 Dec;12(3):525–531. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0120525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hunter R. H. Polyspermic fertilization in pigs after tubal deposition of excessive numbers of spermatozoa. J Exp Zool. 1973 Jan;183(1):57–63. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401830107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hunter R. H. Polyspermic fertilization in pigs during the luteal phase of the estrous cycle. J Exp Zool. 1967 Aug;165(3):451–459. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401650313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hunter R. H. Porcine ovulation after injection of human chorionic gonadotrophin. Vet Rec. 1967 Jul 1;81(1):21–23. doi: 10.1136/vr.81.1.21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hunter R. H. The effects of delayed insemination on fertilization and early cleavage in the pig. J Reprod Fertil. 1967 Feb;13(1):133–147. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0130133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Szollosi D. Development of cortical granules and the cortical reaction in rat and hamster eggs. Anat Rec. 1967 Dec;159(4):431–446. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091590412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Szollosi D., Hunter R. H. Ultrastructural aspects of fertilization in the domestic pig: sperm penetration and pronucleus formation. J Anat. 1973 Nov;116(Pt 2):181–206. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. YANAGIMACHI R., CHANG M. C. Fertilizable life of golden hamster ova and their morphological changes at the time of losing fertilizability. J Exp Zool. 1961 Dec;148:185–203. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401480303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Yanagimachi R., Noda Y. D. Electron microscope studies of sperm incorporation into the golden hamster egg. Am J Anat. 1970 Aug;128(4):429–462. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001280404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Anatomy are provided here courtesy of Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland

RESOURCES