Skip to main content
Frontiers in Veterinary Science logoLink to Frontiers in Veterinary Science
. 2025 Jul 22;12:1568013. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1568013

Detection of Sarcocystis halieti in muscles of raptors from Lithuania

Petras Prakas 1,*, Tautvilė Šukytė 1, Evelina Juozaitytė-Ngugu 1, Dalius Butkauskas 1
PMCID: PMC12320147  PMID: 40761837

Abstract

Background

The genus Sarcocystis comprises a diverse group of apicomplexan parasites that infect reptiles, birds, and mammals. They are characterized by the formation of sarcocysts in the muscles of the intermediate host and the development of sporocysts in the intestines of the definitive host. Raptors usually act as definitive hosts for numerous Sarcocystis species; however there is a lack of studies on Sarcocystis in the muscles of raptorial birds. Therefore, we aimed to assess infection rates and identify Sarcocystis species in the muscles of raptors in Lithuania.

Methods

Muscle samples from 90 raptors (Accipitriformes, Falconiformes, and Strigiformes) were collected throughout Lithuania and analyzed for Sarcocystis spp. Sarcocysts isolated from fresh methylene blue-stained muscle samples were identified using the internal transcribed spacer region 1 sequence genetic marker.

Results

Under the light microscope, sarcocysts were detected in 8.9% (8/90) of the raptors examined. Sarcocysts were found in the leg muscles of common buzzards (Buteo buteo), tawny owls (Strix aluco), and a long-eared owl (Asio otus); neck muscles of a Eurasian goshawk (Accipiter gentilis), rough-legged buzzard (Buteo lagopus), and long-eared owl; and thoracic muscles of a rough-legged buzzard. We observed no sarcocysts in the cardiac muscles. Representatives of one Sarcocystis species, S. halieti were molecularly identified in seven birds.

Conclusion

This is the first study to report five new intermediate hosts for S. halieti. Further investigations are needed to assess the possible pathogenicity of S. halieti in extra-intestinal organs of raptors.

Keywords: Sarcocystis, Accipitriformes, Strigiformes, methylene blue staining, molecular identification, ITS1

1. Introduction

Over the last 500 years, 140 species of birds have become extinct, more than any other vertebrate group (1). Over half of raptors are seeing population reductions worldwide, and 18% of raptors are in danger of going extinct (2). The most common causes of morbidity in raptors are infectious and parasitic diseases, traumatic injuries, toxicosis, and metabolic or nutritional diseases (3). Raptors feature a large diversity of protozoan, helminth, and associated bacterial infections of the digestive system. For instance, the study conducted in 2000 has shown that even 89.2% of all raptors were infected with helminths such as Acanthocephala, Cestoda, Nematoda, and Trematoda (4). In addition, in the same study, coccidians were found in 31.4% of raptors studied. In general, there is still a lack of knowledge about parasite infections in the muscles of raptors (5, 6).

Sarcocystis spp. are apicomplexan intracellular parasites that have a mandatory two-host life cycle. These parasites are known for their characteristics of forming sarcocysts in the muscles of various animals, including poikilothermic ones, birds, and mammals. Two routes of Sarcocystis spp. infection are possible. The primary transmission route is fecal-oral, involving the ingestion of water or food contaminated with sporocysts/oocysts from the feces of the definitive host (DH). The second mode of transmission is ingestion of muscles or other tissues of intermediate hosts (IH) that harbor mature sarcocysts (7).

Globally, various bird species serve as hosts for more than 48 Sarcocystis species (8). Among these, 32 are named species described as utilizing birds as IHs. In contrast, at least 16 Sarcocystis species have been molecularly confirmed to use birds as DHs (6, 9, 10). Sarcocystis spp. are mainly asymptomatic for DHs, while these parasites can cause histopathological changes for tissues of IHs (11). Three species, Sarcocystis halieti, Sarcocystis falcatula, and Sarcocystis wobeseri, have been found in extra-intestinal tissues of birds belonging to orders Accipitriformes and Strigiformes (6, 10–15). Sarcocystis falcatula is highly pathogenic and can cause lung injuries and encephalitis, which can be fatal even to birds (8, 10, 11, 16). However, the prevalence of S. falcatula is restricted to North and South America, where their host species belonging to the genus Didelphis are distributed (7, 17, 18). Sarcocystis halieti is considered to be pathogenic due to a report of severe multifocal granulomatous encephalitis in the little owl (Athene noctua) (10). This Sarcocystis species is multi-host specific and has been identified in Old and New World birds (6, 10, 15, 19). Sarcocysts of S. wobeseri have been identified in muscles of Anseriformes, Charadriiformes, and Accipitriformes (14, 20, 21); however, the pathogenicity of this Sarcocystis species has not yet been fully investigated. Based on molecular analysis, DHs of S. halieti and S. wobeseri belong to the order Accipitriformes (19, 22–25).

In Lithuania, the muscles of birds belonging to Anseriformes, Charadriiformes, and Passeriformes have been the most extensively studied, while raptors have not yet been investigated for muscular sarcocystosis. Thus, our study aimed to evaluate infection rates and identify Sarcocystis species found in the muscles of raptors from Lithuania.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Sample collection

Muscle samples of 90 raptorial birds belonging to orders Accipitriformes, Falconiformes, and Strigiformes were collected in different regions of Lithuania (54–55°N, 21–24°W) between 2014 and 2024 and examined for the presence of sarcocysts of Sarcocystis spp. (Table 1). Samples of birds were retrieved from Kaunas Tadas Ivanauskas Zoology Museum, which is the national authority that runs wildlife research programs and is responsible for monitoring dead animals found. Birds used for our study were killed along roadsides as well as after collisions with architectural structures and high-voltage wires. Muscle samples were kept frozen (−20°C) until microscopic examination of Sarcocystis parasites. The conducted study was approved by the Animal Welfare Committee of the Nature Research Center (no. GGT-9). It should be noted that only some muscle types were available for each bird examined. A total of 243 muscle samples, 54 leg muscle samples, 53 neck tissue samples, 83 thoracic muscles samples and 53 heart samples were tested for sarcocysts (Table 1).

Table 1.

The infection rates of Sarcocystis spp. in various muscles of raptors.

Bird order Bird species No. of birds infected No. of birds examined Prevalence, % No. of birds infected/examined in different muscles
Leg Neck Thoracic Heart
Accipitriformes Eurasian goshawk (Accipiter gentilis) 1 15 6.7 0/12 1/12 0/15 0/12
Accipitriformes Eurasian sparrowhawk (Accipiter nisus) 0 11 0 0/8 0/7 0/10 0/6
Accipitriformes Common buzzard (Buteo buteo) 2 23 8.7 2/16 0/14 0/21 0/14
Accipitriformes Rough-legged buzzard (Buteo lagopus) 1 2 50 1/2 1/1
Accipitriformes Western marsh harrier (Circus aeruginosus) 0 1 0 0/1 0/1 0/1 0/1
Strigiformes Long-eared owl (Asio otus) 2 12 16.7 1/7 1/7 0/12 0/7
Strigiformes Eurasian pygmy owl (Glaucidium passerinum) 0 3 0 0/1 0/2
Strigiformes Tawny owl (Strix aluco) 2 22 9.1 2/10 0/10 0/21 0/11
Falconiformes Common kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) 0 1 0 0/1

2.2. Microscopical identification of Sarcocystis spp

Sarcocystis spp. infection was confirmed by microscopy of stained muscle samples (leg, neck, thoracic, and heart). Twenty-eight rice-sized pieces of each muscle (1 g ± 0.3) were cut from each bird, stained with 0.2% methylene blue for 35 min, soaked in 1.5% acetic acid for 25 min, squeezed into a glass compressor, and examined under light microscopy (LM) at a magnification of × 200. Infection intensity was quantified by counting sarcocysts within 28 tissue sections obtained from the muscle. The sarcocysts detected were removed with a preparation needle, each placed separately in a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube containing 1 mL of 96% ethanol and stored at 4°C. The ethanol was replaced once a week for 1 month or until the blue color faded.

The bird muscle samples in which Sarcocystis spp. infection was detected by methylene blue-staining were re-examined in fresh squashed preparations using a 0.9% NaCl solution. Observed sarcocysts were morphologically characterized at × 200 and × 400 magnifications. The discovered sarcocysts were free from myofibrils as much as possible, and a part of the bradyzoites was released by pressing the cyst firmly. The excreted sarcocysts were placed in individual microcentrifuge tubes filled with 96% ethanol and stored at −20°C until DNA isolation.

2.3. Molecular analysis of detected sarcocysts

The genomic DNA from each isolated sarcocyst was purified using the GeneJET Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Baltics, Vilnius, Lithuania) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Obtained DNA samples were kept frozen at −20°C for further molecular analysis. Sarcocystis species identification was performed using the internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) region, which was previously shown to be variable enough and could be used for the discrimination of avian Sarcocystis species (26).

Firstly, DNA fragments were amplified using nested PCR. Each reaction was carried out using DreamTaq PCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific Baltics, Vilnius, Lithuania). In the first step, a forward NITSpauk1 (5′-TGTCCGGAATGGGAAGTTTT-3′) and reverse NITSpauk2 (5′-ACACCATCCDAAATTCTCAG-3′) primers were used. In the second step, the primer pair NITSpauk3 (5′-GGAAGGATCATTCACACGTT-3′)/NITSpauk4 (5′- ATCACTGCAAGTTCCAACCA-3′) was used (11). After a second round of nested PCR, the resulting 261 bp-long products were purified and sequenced as previously specified (11). Based on the short ITS1 fragments, S. halieti was detected in all cases of successful amplification and sequencing.

For the conclusive Sarcocystis species identification we used longer S. halieti specific primers, forward GsShalF1 (5′-GATAATTGACTTTACGCGCCATTAC-3′) and reverse GsShalR2 (5′-CCATCCCTTTTTCTAAAGGAGGTC-3′) (27) amplifying about a 645 bp-long ITS1 fragment. The generation of such fragments was carried out in two alternative ways, by using nested or direct PCR. In case of the nested PCR, SU1F/5.8SR2 (5′- GATTGAGTGTTCCGGTGAATTATT-3′/5’-AAGGTGCCATTTGCGTTCAGAA-3′) external primers (26) and DreamTaq PCR Master Mix were used following previously described procedures (27). Direct PCR was performed using PlatinumTM SuperFi II Green PCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific Baltics, Vilnius, Lithuania). PCR cycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation for 30 s at 98°C, 35 cycles of 10 s at 98°C, 10 s at 60°C, 30 s at 72°C, and final extension for 5 min at 72°C. Visualization and purification of PCR products and Sanger sequencing were performed as described in Prakas et al. (11).

2.4. Phylogenetic analysis

The obtained ITS1 sequences (GenBank accession numbers: PQ900168–PQ900180) were compared with those of various Sarcocystis spp. using nBLAST sequence similarity search algorithm (28). Phylogenetic analyses were carried out with the help of MEGA v. 11.0.13 software (29). Multiple sequence alignments were generated using the MUSCLE algorithm. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using the Maximum Likelihood (ML) method. The nucleotide substitution model that best suited the analyzed alignments was selected using the MEGA “Find Best DNA/Protein Models (ML).” The robustness of phylogeny was tested using the bootstrap method with 1,000 bootstrap replications.

3. Results

3.1. Infection rate and parasite load of sarcocysts in raptors

The infection rate of Sarcocystis spp. was established by examining methylene blue-stained muscle samples. Sarcocysts were detected in 8.9% (8/90) of muscles of Lithuanian raptors examined (Table 1). Sarcocysts were found in the leg muscles of two common buzzards (Buteo buteo) (12.5%, 2/16) and tawny owls (Strix aluco) (20%, 2/10), and one long-eared owl (Asio otus) (14.3%, 1/7). In addition, Sarcocystis spp. were found in the neck muscles of a single Eurasian goshawk (Accipiter gentilis) (8.3%, 1/12), rough-legged buzzard (Buteo lagopus) (1/2), and long-eared owl (14.3%, 1/7). Furthermore, Sarcocystis spp. have been observed in the thoracic muscles of one rough-legged buzzard (Table 1). No sarcocysts were observed in the hearts of birds examined. Overall, of the 243 muscle samples stained with methylene blue, sarcocysts were found in nine of them (3.7%).

Higher, but statistically not significant (χ2 = 0.26, p = 0.612), infection rate was identified in birds of the order Strigiformes (4/37; 10.8%) compared to that determined in birds of the order Accipitriformes (4/52; 7.7%). Most frequently, sarcocysts were detected in leg muscles (5/54; 9.3%), followed by neck (3/54; 5.6) and thoracic (1/83; 1.2) muscles.

The parasite load ranged from one to 15 cysts/g of muscles stained with methylene blue; the mean and median parasite load were two and four cysts/g of muscle, respectively.

3.2. Morphology of detected sarcocysts

Sarcocyts were observed in fresh muscle samples from only two birds. In methylene blue-stained samples, Sarcocystis spp. sarcocysts were found to be 4,952 × 34 μm (range: 2673–7,380 × 25–64 μm; n = 10) in size and looked like tiny threads (Figure 1A). The sarcocyst wall found in unstained squashed muscles appeared to be smooth and 1 μm thick (Figure 1B). Septa split sarcocysts into sections that were filled with 6.7 × 1.9 μm (4.9–8.7 × 1.2–2.5 μm; n = 7) banana-shaped bradyzoites (Figure 1C).

Figure 1.

Microscopic images labeled A, B, and C. Image A shows a dark, slender filament marked by an arrow, at 100 micrometers scale. Image B presents a translucent, elongated structure with an asterisk, at 50 micrometers scale. Inset C shows several small, crescent-shaped objects, at 2 micrometers scale.

Morphology of Sarcocystis halieti in tissue sample taken from leg muscle of raptors. (A) Sarcocyst from common buzzard (Buteo buteo) stained with methylene blue; the arrow shows the cyst. (B) Fragment of the smooth cyst wall in fresh preparation from tawny owl (Strix aluco); *marked the cyst wall. (C) Banana-shaped bradyzoites in fresh sample from tawny owl.

3.3. Molecular identification of Sarcocystis halieti

In fresh samples, sarcocysts of Sarcocystis spp. were only observed and isolated from neck muscles of the rough-legged buzzard and leg muscles of the tawny owl. In eight more Sarcocystis spp. positive samples, sarcocysts were found only in methylene blue-stained preparations. One sarcocyst from each Sarcocystis spp. positive sample was subjected to molecular analysis. Using the Sarcocystis spp.-specific NITSpauk3/NITSpauk4 primer pair, we obtained three different 221 bp-long ITS1 genotypes differing in 1–2 SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms). These ITS1 sequences showed 95.9–100% identity to those of S. halieti, 94.6–95.0% similarity to that of Sarcocystis sp. isolate Skua-2016-CH (MW160469), 94.1–94.6% similarity to those of Sarcocystis sp. isolate 38P (PQ133336) and Sarcocystis sp. ex Accipiter cooperii (KY348755), similarity to that of 93.6–94.1% Sarcocystis sp. ex Corvus corax (MZ707151) and 92.9–93.3%% similarity to that of Sarcocystis corvusi (JN256119).

Using S. halieti-specific primers (GsShalF1/GsShalR2), we were able to amplify five samples when conventional PCR and PlatinumTM SuperFi polymerase were applied, whereas three samples were positive when nested PCR and DreamTaq polymerase were used (Table 2). The five 596 bp-long ITS1 sequences generated represented four distinct genetic variants that differed in one to three SNPs. The comparison of these 596 bp-long ITS1 sequences demonstrated 96.8–100% identity to those of S. halieti, 96.1–96.5% similarity to that of Sarcocystis sp. isolate Skua-2016-CH, 94.6–95.0% similarity to that of Sarcocystis sp. ex Corvus corax, 92.8–93.2% similarity to that of Sarcocystis sp. isolate 38P, 92.7–93.0% similarity to that of Sarcocystis sp. ex Accipiter cooperii, 91.7–92.3% similarity to those of S. columbae, and 90.9–91.2% similarity to that of S. corvusi. Thus, based on DNA sequence analysis S. halieti was identified in eight muscle samples of raptors from Lithuania (Table 2).

Table 2.

Identification of Sarcocystis halieti in muscles of raptors using different muscle examination techniques, PCR methods and polymerases.

Bird species ID Muscle Fresh/stained Nested PCR Nested PCR Conventional PCR
DreamTaq DreamTaq PlatinumTM SuperFi
NITSpauk3/NITSpauk4 GsShalF1 GsShalR2 GsShalF1/GsShalR2
Eurasian goshawk 9 Neck Stained PQ900173 Neg. PQ900168
Common buzzard 5 Leg Stained PQ900174 * PQ900169
Common buzzard 19 Leg Stained Neg. Neg. Neg.
Rough-legged buzzard 2 Thoracic Stained PQ900175 Neg. Neg.
Rough-legged buzzard 2 Neck Fresh PQ900176 * PQ900170
Long-eared owl 9 Thoracic Stained PQ900177 Neg. PQ900171
Long-eared owl 11 Neck Stained PQ900178 Neg. Neg.
Tawny owl 18 Leg Stained PQ900179 Neg. Neg.
Tawny owl 30 Leg Fresh PQ900180 * PQ900172

ID, identification number of bird sample; Neg., not amplified sample. *positive PCR, but not sequenced.

3.4. Phylogenetic results

For the phylogenetic analyses, all possible different genetic variants of S. halieti taken from GenBank were included. In addition to our S. halieti sequences, eight and 18 different ITS1 genotypes were analyzed, when sequences were obtained using NITSpauk3/NITSpauk4 and GsShalF1/GsShalR2 primers, respectively. Furthermore, sequences of other Sarcocystis spp. showing the highest similarity to our sequences were used to reveal phylogenetic relationships. The ITS1 sequences generated in the present study with fairly high bootstrap support values (84 and 94) were grouped with other sequences of S. halieti (Figure 2). However, using short 221 bp-long ITS1 fragments, a single sequence of S. halieti OP419624 formed a separate branch in the phylogram (Figure 2A). Based on longer ~596 bp-long ITS1 sequences, S. halieti genetic variants clustered into several clades (Figure 2B). Sequences obtained in the present work were grouped with those of S. halieti isolated from various IHs (birds classified as insectivorous, piscivores, omnivores, and raptors) and DHs of the order Accipitriformes collected in the Czeck Republic, Lithuania, and Spain. Both phylogenetic analyses showed that S. halieti was most related to Sarcocystis sp. from Chilean skua (Stercorarius chilensis) (MW160469).

Figure 2.

Phylogenetic tree diagram divided into sections labeled A and B, displaying genetic relationships among species. The tree includes species names and genetic identifiers. Bootstrap values are shown at nodes, indicating the statistical support for the branch groupings. The scale bar indicates genetic distance.

The phylogenetic placement of S. halieti isolates obtained from raptors in Lithuania. Phylogenetic trees were obtained analyzing ITS1 sequences obtained with the help of NITSpauk3/NITSpauk4 (A) and GsShalF1/GsShalR2 (B) primer pairs. Trees were constructed using ML method, scaled according to the branch length and rooted on S. wobeseri. In the left analysis (A) the alignment consisted of 17 sequences and 225 nucleotide positions; Tamura 3 parameter + G nucleotide substitution model was set. In the right analysis (B) the alignment contained of 29 sequences and 624 nucleotide positions; HKY nucleotide substitution model was set. Sequences generated in present study are indicated in boldface.

4. Discussion

In the current study, we provide the first data on Sarcocystis in the muscles of raptors from Lithuania. Based on methylene blue-staining, sarcocysts of Sarcocystis spp. were observed in 8.9% of 90 muscle samples of raptorial birds from Lithuania (Table 1). Sarcocysts were found in the leg, neck, and thoracic muscles of the birds studied, but not in the heart. Using the same method of microscopic analysis, birds of three families, i.e., Anatidae, Corvidae, and Laridae, were the most extensively studied for the presence of sarcocysts in Lithuania (20, 21, 30–36). Comparing the estimated infection rates, sarcocysts were much less frequently found in the muscles of raptors than in those of corvids (62/181, 34.3%), anatids (100/342, 29.2%), and larids (21/140, 15.0%) (20, 21, 36, 37).

It should also be mentioned that there is also a lack of comprehensive research on Sarcocystis in extra-intestinal tissues worldwide (6). Previously, Sarcocystis spp. were detected in the skeletal muscles, heart, and brain of raptors (5, 6, 10, 12, 13, 15, 38). In general, the observed infection rates of Sarcocystis spp. in muscles highly depend on the method applied (6), methylene blue-staining, histological examination, muscle digestion, or immunofluorescence antibody testing (5, 39–41). However, in most cases the infection rates observed in the muscles of raptors were in the range of 5 and 15%, despite studies having been carried out in different geographical regions, Australia, Brazil, Germany, Kazakhstan, and Spain (5, 6, 39, 41, 42).

By microscopical examination, thin and smooth sarcocysts, similar to those found in our study (Figure 1), were also detected in muscles of common kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) from Kazakhstan (42), in common buzzard from Germany (5), and in several species of raptors from the United States (38). However, several avian Sarcocystis spp. form sarcocysts with smooth and thin cyst walls. Furthermore, two Sarcocystis species (S. halieti and S. wobeseri) having thin sarcocysts walls have been confirmed in raptors (6, 14). Therefore, conclusive identification of sarcocysts found in raptors’ muscles requires molecular analysis methods.

In the present study, by using nested PCR and NITSpauk3/ NITSpauk4 primers, S. halieti was confirmed in muscles of seven birds belonging to five different species of orders Accipitriformes and Strigiformes (Table 2). Based on a comparison of ITS1 sequences, the obtained intraspecific and interspecific genetic variability values did not overlap, showing that the species was correctly identified. The detection of S. halieti in the samples analyzed was also confirmed by phylogenetic analysis, as investigated parasite isolates significantly clustered with other isolates of S. halieti (Figure 2). Thus, relatively small 221 bp-long and 596 bp-long fragments of ITS1 can be used for the identification of S. halieti. Sarcocystis spp. from birds have evolved more recently compared to species found in mammals and reptiles (7). Therefore, conservative markers, such as ribosomal 18S rRNA, the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 gene (cox1), and the RNA polymerase B gene of the apicoplast genome (rpoB), are not variable enough to discriminate all Sarcocystis species with birds as IH (21, 24, 26, 43). By contrast, numerous studies have confirmed that highly variable ITS1 is currently the most appropriate marker for distinguishing avian Sarcocystis species (6, 15, 21, 23, 36, 41, 43). In the current work, the GsShalF1/GsShalR2 primer pair has been confirmed in several studies to be specific for the amplification of S. halieti (25, 27). Other primers (internal NITSpauk1/NITSpauk2 and external NITSpauk3/NITSpauk4) we have applied in the present study were theoretically designed for the detection of Sarcocystis spp. employing birds and predatory mammals as their IHs (11). Due to short products amplified and due to Sarcocystis spp. conservative primers NITSpauk1, targeting 18S rRNA, the above-described primers can be used for the initial screening of muscles of birds and predatory mammals for the presence of Sarcocystis spp.

Based on ITS1 or 28S rRNA S. halieti was previously detected in muscles and brains of birds belonging to even six orders: Accipitriformes, Charadriiformes, Passeriformes, Procellariiformes, Strigiformes, and Suliformes (6, 10, 11, 15, 20, 21, 23, 36, 41, 43). Sarcocysts of S. halieti were found in birds from Europe, South America, and Asia (6, 11, 15, 20, 41; also see PQ270246 and PQ276104 GenBank records). In this study, we provide new host records of S. halieti in common buzzard, Eurasian goshawk, rough-legged buzzard (Accipitridae), long-eared owl and tawny owl (Strigidae). During this study, the material obtained from Kaunas Tadas Ivanauskas Zoology Museum was frozen, which prevented us from performing histopathological examinations. Prior to this study, S. halieti was confirmed in Lithuania in muscles of birds of Corvidae, Laridae, and Phalacrocoracidae families (20, 21, 36, 43). Furthermore, relatively high detection rates of S. halieti were established in intestinal scrapings of common buzzards, Eurasian goshawks and Eurasian sparrowhawks (Accipiter nisus) collected in Lithuania (24, 25). Therefore, we can expect to find this Sarcocystis species in understudied IH. According to the current knowledge, S. halieti is widely adapted to parasitise New World and Old World birds that live in terrestrial and aquatic environments and are prey or predators (6, 10, 11, 15, 20, 21, 23, 36, 41, 43). It is worrisome that S. halieti is thought to cause granulomatous encephalitis in little owl (10), but most of the studies that have been done so far have only looked at how to diagnose this parasite in muscle tissues (20, 21). Furthermore, neurological sarcocystosis was reported in several raptors, i.e., American goshawk (Astur atricapillus), bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), and golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) from the United States (reviewed by 7). Thus, future extensive histopathological examinations of various birds are desirable to enclose pathogenicity and threat of S. halieti and potentially other Sarcocystis species parasitizing raptors.

To detect sarcocysts, we used a modified microscopic-compressor method initially designed to examine muscle samples of Trichinella spp. (44, 45). The method based on the analysis of methylene blue-stained muscle samples squeezed between glass compressors is superior to the analysis of fresh muscle samples in the case of low parasite loads of Sarcocystis spp. (46). Furthermore, in the case of our study, we obtained intact sarcocysts, which is not possible in the case of tissue digestion, a highly effective method for detecting low levels of Sarcocystis infection in muscle samples analyzed (47). Extraction of high-quality DNA from stained and/or fixed samples remains challenging (48). The fixation of tissues leads to fragmentation of the nucleic acids and has a negative impact on the quantity of recovered DNA. A lot of studies have been performed to optimize the extraction process from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples (49). Several studies have successfully identified Sarcocystis species using molecular techniques from FFPE samples (12, 50, 51). Some of the studies have shown that PCR primers targeting relatively short DNA fragments (200–500 bp) facilitate the amplification of Sarcocystis species DNA from FFPE samples (11, 51). Initially, for the screening of Sarcocystis spp. in methylene blue samples, we selected to use a nested PCR approach. This PCR method is an attractive choice because it increases sensitivity and specificity and can amplify target sequences presented in low abundance (52, 53). Research has demonstrated the value of nested PCR in amplifying DNA fragments from FFPE samples (11, 54). However, nested PCR has the disadvantage of increasing the number of false positive results, mainly due to cross-contamination caused by the transfer of the products of the first amplification step to a second tube (55). Therefore, we subsequently tried direct PCR with S. halieti-specific primers. Based on direct PCR, 1/7 and 3/7 methylene blue samples were successfully amplified using standard and high-fidelity polymerases, respectively (Table 2). In each case, the Sanger sequencing confirmed S. halieti in PCR-positive samples. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first successful attempt to identify Sarcocystis species by PCR-based methods from methylene blue-stained muscle samples. The applied method is attractive since Sarcocystis species are diagnosed from microscopically observed sarcocysts rather than from bradyzoite suspension obtained after digestion or from DNA extracted from host tissue (47, 56). We suggest this method when the muscle samples have been frozen for too long and when parasite load is low. However, optimisation of DNA extraction and PCR procedures from sarcocysts stained with methylene blue is still needed.

5. Conclusion

The present study is the first attempt to detect Sarcocystis parasites in the muscles of raptors from Lithuania. Based on methylene blue-staining, sarcocysts were detected in 8.9% (8/90) of the raptors tested, which is consistent with the low prevalence of Sarcocystis spp. in raptors reported worldwide. Using DNA sequence comparisons, the potentially pathogenic S. halieti was identified in five new intermediate host species. Due to its pathogenic potential, further extensive histopathological examinations of these hosts are recommended. In addition, for the first time, we managed to identify Sarcocystis species from methylene blue-stained muscle samples. We recommend using the suggested method when the available tissue samples are not fresh, or parasite load is low.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Kaunas T. Ivanauskas Zoology Museum for providing bird samples used in the study.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. The research was funded by the Research Council of Lithuania (grant no. S-MIP-23-4).

Data availability statement

The original data are available in a publicly accessible repository of the GenBank under the accession numbers: PQ900168–PQ900180.

Ethics statement

The animal study was approved by Animal Welfare Committee of the Nature Research Center. The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.

Author contributions

PP: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. TŠ: Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. EJ-N: Investigation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. DB: Conceptualization, Supervision, Methodology, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1.McClure CJW, Buij R, Thorstrom R, Vargas FH, Virani MZ. The world’s most imperiled raptors present substantial conservation challenges. J Raptor Res. (2023) 57:79. doi: 10.3356/JRR-22-79 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.McClure CJW, Westrip JRS, Johnson JA, Schulwitz SE, Virani MZ, Davies R, et al. State of the world’s raptors: distributions, threats, and conservation recommendations. Biol Conserv. (2018) 227:390–402. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.08.012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Oliveira AR, Souza TD, Mol JPS, Flecher MC, Hiura E, Santos RL. Pathological and molecular characterization of systemic isosporosis (atoxoplasmosis) in captive green-winged saltator (Saltator similis). Vet Parasitol. (2018) 255:98–101. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.04.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Krone O. Endoparasites In: Krone O, editor. Raptor research and management techniques. 2nd ed. United States: Wilson Ornithological Society; (2007) [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Krone O, Rudolph M, Jakob W. Protozoa in the breast muscle of raptors in Germany. Acta Protozool. (2000) 39:35–42. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Prakas P, Bea A, Juozaitytė-Ngugu E, Olano I, Villanúa D, Švažas S, et al. Molecular identification of Sarcocystis halieti in the muscles of two species of birds of prey from Spain. Parasit Vectors. (2021) 14:414. doi: 10.1186/s13071-021-04921-0, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dubey JP, Calero-Bernal R, Rosenthal BM, Speer CA, Fayer R. Sarcocystosis of animals and humans. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Prakas P, Calero-Bernal R, Dubey JP. Sarcocystis infection in domestic and wild avian hosts: inseparable flight partners. Vet Parasitol. (2025) 335:110413. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2025.110413 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Maier-Sam K, Kaiponen T, Schmitz A, Schulze C, Bock S, Hlinak A, et al. Encephalitis associated with Sarcocystis halieti infection in a free-ranging little owl (Athene noctua). J Wildl Dis. (2021) 57:712–4. doi: 10.7589/JWD-D-20-00184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Prakas P, Estruch J, Velarde R, Ilgūnas M, Šneideris D, Nicolás-Francisco O, et al. First report of Sarcocystis halieti (Apicomplexa) in bearded vulture (Gypaetus barbatus). Vet Res Commun. (2024) 48:541–6. doi: 10.1007/s11259-023-10191-1, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fayer R, Esposito DH, Dubey JP. Human infections with Sarcocystis species. Clin Microbiol Rev. (2015) 28:295–311. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00113-14, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wünschmann A, Rejmanek D, Cruz-Martínez L, Barr BC. Sarcocystis falcatula-associated encephalitis in a free-ranging great horned owl (Bubo virginianus). J Vet Diagn Invest. (2009) 21:283–7. doi: 10.1177/104063870902100223 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wünschmann A, Rejmanek D, Conrad PA, Hall N, Cruz-Martinez L, Vaughn SB, et al. Natural fatal Sarcocystis falcatula infections in free-ranging eagles in North America. J Vet Diagn Invest. (2010) 22:282–9. doi: 10.1177/104063871002200222 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shadbolt T, Pocknell A, Sainsbury AW, Egerton-Read S, Blake DP. Molecular identification of Sarcocystis wobeseri-like parasites in a new intermediate host species, the white-tailed sea eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla). Parasitol Res. (2021) 120:1845–50. doi: 10.1007/s00436-021-07103-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Llano HAB, Zavatieri Polato H, Borges Keid L, de Souza F, Oliveira TM, Zwarg T, et al. Molecular screening for Sarcocystidae in muscles of wild birds from Brazil suggests a plethora of intermediate hosts for Sarcocystis falcatula. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. (2022) 17:230–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2022.03.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Konradt G, Bianchi MV, Leite-Filho RV, da Silva BZ, Soares RM, Pavarini SP, et al. Necrotizing meningoencephalitis caused by Sarcocystis falcatula in bare-faced ibis (Phimosus infuscatus). Parasitol Res. (2017) 116:809–12. doi: 10.1007/s00436-016-5341-6, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dubey JP, Lindsay DS, Rezende PC, Costa AJ. Characterization of an unidentified Sarcocystis falcatula-like parasite from the south American opossum, Didelphis albiventris from Brazil. J Eukaryot Microbiol. (2000) 47:538–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2000.tb00087.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gondim LFP, Soares RM, Tavares AS, Borges-Silva W, de Jesus RF, Llano HAB, et al. Sarcocystis falcatula-like derived from opossum in northeastern Brazil: in vitro propagation in avian cells, molecular characterization and bioassay in birds. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. (2019) 10:132–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2019.08.008, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rogers KH, Arranz-Solís D, Saeij JPJ, Lewis S, Mete A. Sarcocystis calchasi and other Sarcocystidae detected in predatory birds in California, USA. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. (2021) 17:91–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2021.12.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kutkienė L, Prakas P, Sruoga A, Butkauskas D. The mallard duck (Anas platyrhynchos) as intermediate host for Sarcocystis wobeseri sp. nov. from the barnacle goose (Branta leucopsis). Parasitol Res. (2010) 107:879–88. doi: 10.1007/s00436-010-1945-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Juozaitytė-Ngugu E, Prakas P. The richness of Sarcocystis species in the common gull (Larus canus) and black-headed gull (Larus ridibundus) from Lithuania. Parasitologia (Bratisl). (2023) 3:172–80. doi: 10.3390/parasitologia3020018 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gjerde B, Vikøren T, Hamnes IS. Molecular identification of Sarcocystis halieti n. sp., Sarcocystis lari and Sarcocystis truncata in the intestine of a white-tailed sea eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla) in Norway. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. (2018) 7:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2017.12.001, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Máca O, González-Solís D. Role of three bird species in the life cycle of two Sarcocystis spp. (Apicomplexa, Sarcocystidae) in the Czech Republic. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. (2022) 17:133–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2022.01.002, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Šukytė T, Butkauskas D, Juozaitytė-Ngugu E, Švažas S, Prakas P. Molecular confirmation of Accipiter birds of prey as definitive hosts of numerous Sarcocystis species, including Sarcocystis sp., closely related to pathogenic S. calchasi. Pathogens. (2023) 12:752. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12060752, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Šukytė T, Juozaitytė-Ngugu E, Švažas S, Butkauskas D, Prakas P. The genetic identification of numerous apicomplexan Sarcocystis species in intestines of common buzzard (Buteo buteo). Animals. (2024) 14:2391. doi: 10.3390/ani14162391, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gjerde B. Molecular characterisation of Sarcocystis rileyi from a common eider (Somateria mollissima) in Norway. Parasitol Res. (2014) 113:3501–9. doi: 10.1007/s00436-014-4062-y, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Juozaitytė-Ngugu E, Švažas S, Šneideris D, Rudaitytė-Lukošienė E, Butkauskas D, Prakas P. The role of birds of the family Corvidae in transmitting Sarcocystis protozoan parasites. Animals. (2021) 11:3258. doi: 10.3390/ani11113258, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. (1990) 215:403–10. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol. (2021) 38:3022–7. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab120, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kutkienė L, Prakas P, Sruoga A, Butkauskas D. Description of Sarcocystis anasi sp. nov. and Sarcocystis albifronsi sp. nov. in birds of the order Anseriformes. Parasitol Res. (2012) 110:1043–6. doi: 10.1007/s00436-011-2588-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kutkienė L, Prakas P, Sruoga A, Butkauskas D. Sarcocystis in the birds family Corvidae with description of Sarcocystis cornixi sp. nov. from the hooded crow (Corvus cornix). Parasitol Res. (2009) 104:329–36. doi: 10.1007/s00436-008-1196-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Prakas P, Kutkienė L, Butkauskas D, Sruoga A, Žalakevičius M. Molecular and morphological investigations of Sarcocystis corvusi sp. nov. from the jackdaw (Corvus monedula). Parasitol Res. (2013) 112:1163–7. doi: 10.1007/s00436-012-3247-5, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Prakas P, Kutkienė L, Butkauskas D, Sruoga A, Žalakevičius M. Description of Sarcocystis lari sp. n. (Apicomplexa: Sarcocystidae) from the great black-backed gull, Larus marinus (Charadriiformes: Laridae), on the basis of cyst morphology and molecular data. Folia Parasitol Praha. (2014) 61:11–7. doi: 10.14411/fp.2014.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Prakas P, Butkauskas D, Juozaitytė-Ngugu E. Molecular identification of four Sarcocystis species in the herring gull, Larus argentatus, from Lithuania. Parasit Vectors. (2020) 13:869. doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3869-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Prakas P, Butkauskas D, Juozaitytė-Ngugu E. Molecular and morphological description of Sarcocystis kutkienae sp. nov. from the common raven (Corvus corax). Parasitol Res. (2020) 119:4205–10. doi: 10.1007/s00436-020-06941-8, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Juozaitytė-Ngugu E, Butkauskas D, Švažas S, Prakas P. Investigations on Sarcocystis species in the leg muscles of the bird family Corvidae in Lithuania. Parasitol Res. (2022) 121:703–11. doi: 10.1007/s00436-021-07409-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kutkienė L, Sruoga A. Sarcocystis spp. in birds of the order Anseriformes. Parasitol Res. (2004) 92:171–2. doi: 10.1007/s00436-003-1018-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Von Dohlen AR, Scott D, Dubey JP, Lindsay DS. Prevalence of Sarcocysts in the muscles of raptors from a rehabilitation center in North Carolina. J Parasitol. (2019) 105:11–6. doi: 10.1645/18-139 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Munday BL, Hartley WJ, Harrigan KE, Presidente PJA, Obendorf DL. Sarcocystis and related organisms in Australian wildlife: II. Survey findings in birds, reptiles, amphibians and fish. J Wildl Dis. (1979) 15:57–73. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-15.1.57 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lindsay DS, Blagburn BL. Prevalence of encysted apicomplexans in muscles of raptors. Vet Parasitol. (1999) 80:341–4. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(98)00228-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sato AP, Goulart MA, Konell AL, de Oliveira Koch M, da Fonseca FM, Morel AP, et al. Serosurvey of Toxoplasma gondii, Neospora caninum and Sarcocystis neurona in raptors and risk factor analysis. Parasitol Int. (2021) 82:102312. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2021.102312 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Pak SM, Eshtokina NV. Sarcosporidians of birds In: Pak SM, editor. Sarcosporidians of animals in Kazakhstan. Alma-Ata: Nauka; (1984) [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Prakas P, Butkauskas D, Švažas S, Stanevičius V. Morphological and genetic characterisation of Sarcocystis halieti from the great cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo). Parasitol Res. (2018) 117:3663–7. doi: 10.1007/s00436-018-6083-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Angi AH, Satrija F, Lukman DW, Sudarwanto M, Sudarnika E. Microscopic examination of pig masseter muscle by pooled sample digestion method to identify the presence of Trichinella spp. larvae. Parasitol Vet. (2023) 28:1862. doi: 10.5380/avs.v28i4.91862 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Sharma R, Thompson PC, Hoberg EP, Scandrett WB, Konecsni K, Harms NJ, et al. Hiding in plain sight: discovery and phylogeography of a cryptic species of Trichinella (Nematoda: Trichinellidae) in wolverine (Gulo gulo). Int J Parasitol. (2020) 50:277–87. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2020.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ng YH, Subramaniam V, Lau YL. Modified use of methylene blue in the tissue compression technique to detect sarcocysts in meat-producing animals. Vet Parasitol. (2015) 214:200–3. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.09.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Prakas P, Rehbein S, Rudaitytė-Lukošienė E, Butkauskas D. Molecular identification of Sarcocystis species in diaphragm muscle tissue of European mouflon (Ovis gmelini musimon) from Austria. Parasitol Res. (2021) 120:2695–702. doi: 10.1007/s00436-021-07212-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lin J, Kennedy SH, Svarovsky T, Rogers J, Kemnitz JW, Xu A, et al. High-quality genomic DNA extraction from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded samples deparaffinized using mineral oil. Anal Biochem. (2009) 395:265–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2009.08.016, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ramesh PS, Madegowda V, Kumar S, Narasimha S, Parichay SR, Manoli NN, et al. DNA extraction from archived hematoxylin and eosin-stained tissue slides for downstream molecular analysis. World J Methodol. (2019) 9:32–43. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v9.i3.32 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Gozalo AS, Montali RJ, St Claire M, Barr B, Rejmanek D, Ward JM. Chronic polymyositis associated with disseminated Sarcocystosis in a captive-born rhesus macaque. Vet Pathol. (2007) 44:695–9. doi: 10.1354/vp.44-5-695 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Hodo CL, Whitley DB, Hamer SA, Corapi WV, Snowden K, Heatley JJ, et al. Histopathologic and molecular characterization of Sarcocystis calchasi encephalitis in white-winged doves (Zenaida asiatica) and Eurasian collared doves (Streptopelia decaocto), east-Central Texas, USA, 2010-13. J Wildl Dis. (2016) 52:395–9. doi: 10.7589/2015-10-292, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Yang S, Rothman RE. PCR-based diagnostics for infectious diseases: uses, limitations, and future applications in acute-care settings. Lancet Infect Dis. (2004) 4:337–48. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(04)01044-8, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Green MR, Sambrook J. Nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Cold Spring Harb Protoc. (2019) 2019:pdb.prot095182. doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot095182, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Dietrich D, Uhl B, Sailer V, Holmes EE, Jung M, Meller S, et al. Improved PCR performance using template DNA from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues by overcoming PCR inhibition. PLoS One. (2013) 8:e77771. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077771, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Liu L, Li M, Liu G, He J, Liu Y, Chen X, et al. A novel, highly sensitive, one-tube nested quantitative real-time PCR for Brucella in human blood samples. Microbiol Spectr. (2023) 11:e0058223. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00582-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Fernández-Escobar M, Millán J, Chirife AD, Ortega-Mora LM, Calero-Bernal R. Molecular survey for cyst-forming coccidia (Toxoplasma gondii, Neospora caninum, Sarcocystis spp.) in Mediterranean Periurban micromammals. Parasitol Res. (2020) 119:2679–86. doi: 10.1007/s00436-020-06777-2, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The original data are available in a publicly accessible repository of the GenBank under the accession numbers: PQ900168–PQ900180.


Articles from Frontiers in Veterinary Science are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES