Skip to main content
Research logoLink to Research
. 2025 Aug 5;8:0790. doi: 10.34133/research.0790

Two-Dimensional Metals Over, Inside, or Beneath Templates

Jinbo Pang 1,*,, Shuye Zhang 2,3,, Yufeng Hao 4,*, Hong Liu 1,5, Mark H Rummeli 6,7,8,*, Weijia Zhou 1,*, Rafael G Mendes 9
PMCID: PMC12322969  PMID: 40766000

Abstract

Two-dimensional (2D) metals have drawn great attention because of their extraordinary properties, especially in applications that favor van der Waals interaction. The development of advanced characterization tools has facilitated the understanding of formation or growth mechanisms of 2D metals. In this perspective, we discuss 5 common approaches to obtaining 2D metals, including, (top down) van der Waals squeezing and selective extraction, and (bottom up) electron beam-induced growth, self-assembly, and graphene-templated wet chemistry growth. The future opportunities are proposed in the summary section. Furthermore, challenges and problems such as thermodynamic stability and scalability in 2D material growth are proposed for the community to tackle.

Background

Two-dimensional (2D) materials, e.g., graphene, are first predicted to be unstable, viz., thermal fluctuations of their lattice lead to the collapse of the structure. Then, the cleavage of graphite by using Scotch tape has succeeded in isolating monolayer graphene.

Unlike graphene, metals are often close packed due to nondirectional metallic bonds. Therefore, 2D metals cannot be exfoliated from 3D bulk metals without layered structure. The terminology “2D metals” refers to the one-atom-thick elemental metals [1], which is analogous to graphene, one-atom-thick carbon nanosheet of hexagonal lattice. 2D metals are a geometry concept of nonlayered structure. Previously, the concept of Xenes is proposed [2] for summarizing the monoelemental 2D materials, including both nonmetals, e.g., B (borophene), C (graphene), Si (silicene), Ge (germanene), P (phosphorene), and As (arsenene), as well as 2D metals, e.g., Sb (antimonene) and Sn (stanene). Recently, plumbene (Pb) is experimentally synthesized by segregation mechanism with theoretically calculated bandgap. Here, we summarize the category of one-atom-thick metals as 2D metals. Sometimes, one may expand the 2D metal concept to thickness of a few atoms (e.g., nanosheets), similar to few-layer graphene (<10 layers).

Interestingly, 2D metals shows superior potentials in applications that favor large specific area. Indeed, bulk 3D metals often play the role of conducting electrodes in electronics and electrochemistry. When thinning the thickness, ultrathin 2D metal films provide a new physical platform for investigating emerging phenomenon [3], such as surface and edge conductivity, quantum optics, large band gap (6 eV, dielectrics) [4], and plasmonics. Besides, large specific area of 2D metals facilitates the surface reaction in electrochemistry for energy conversion including catalysis and fuel cells.

Ultrathin metal films (down to a few nanometers thick) can be fabricated by conventional thermal deposition methods. Thin solid films, including metals, can be grown by conventional deposition methods, such as sputtering, electron-beam evaporation, and physical vapor deposition. Often, the metal films are micrometer thick with nanocrystalline or microcrystalline feature, which serves as electrodes for electronic devices. By pulsed physical vapor deposition, ultrathin Te nanowires (quasi-metal metalloid) can be synthesized with a 10-nm thickness [5]. When decreasing the thickness of metals to 4 nm, incomplete films form with discrete islands [6], analogous to dewetting behavior, which could be attributed to the surface/interface stress from change in surface energy during the continuous metal deposition.

Also, ultrathin metal films can be fabricated by atomic layer deposition, e.g., Ru (3 nm) [7], Ir (1 nm), and Pt (2.5 nm) [8]. The deposition mechanism is the chemisorption of metal–organic coordination complex over substrates and thermal decomposition of the organic ligands from central metal atoms.

By molecular beam epitaxy, Jia and colleagues [4] fabricated 2D Sn monolayer (stanene) over Bi2Te3 (111) substrates. The biatomic-layer structure of stanene shows height difference (0.12 nm) between these 2 atomic layers of Sn. The deposition rate of Sn metal minimizes at 0.4 monolayer min−1, as evaporated from effusion cell. Scanning tunneling microscope (STM) images of 2D Sn/Bi2Te3 species exhibit the alignment of Sn atoms, vertically located above each Te atom (the top layer of Bi2Te3), probably due to the little lattice mismatch between these 2 crystals [4].

Many 2D metals suffer from oxidation and degradation upon exposure in ambient conditions [9]. In early stage, 2D metals are characterized by STM tool in ultrahigh vacuum condition. Indeed, one-atom-thick Pb and In films are fabricated over Si (111) surface by molecular beam epitaxy method [10]. For device fabrication, one may overcome the oxidation challenges by encapsulating 2D metals with inert materials, e.g., h-BN or graphene. Thus, the h-BN encapsulated 2D metal Bi (5 nm) was fabricated by van der Waals molding [11]. Besides, confined heteroepitaxy occurs for atomically thin 2D metal growth at the graphene/SiC interfaces [12,13].

In this perspective, we briefly introduce 5 methods for fabricating 2D metals. Two paths exist for nanomaterials fabrication, i.e., top-down and bottom-up. The van der Waals squeezing and selective extraction can be classified into top-down methods. Then, electron beam-induced 2D metal growth, graphene-templated Au nanosheets, self-assembly, and CO reduction of Pd nanosheets can be categorized as bottom-up methods.

Figure shows the 5 methods for obtaining 2D metals. They are electron beam irradiation-induced 2D metal membrane over graphene pores [14], extrusion of liquid metal between 2 MoS2 anvil [15], graphene-templated Au nanosheet [16], carbon monoxide-reduced Pd nanosheets [17], and selective extraction of Au monolayer from Ti3AuC2 MXene sheets [18] (from top to bottom). Now, we briefly introduce the different methods for preparing 2D metals.

Figure.

Figure.

Common strategies for obtaining 2D metals. 2D metal membrane (A) inside graphene pores, (B) beneath anvil, (C) over templates, (D) self-assembly, and (E) selective extraction.

First, we come to discuss electron beam-induced 2D metal membranes inside graphene pores.

Graphene Nanopore-Confined 2D Metals

On chemical vapor deposition (CVD)-grown graphene samples, one can often observe Fe species by element analysis in a transmission electron microscope (TEM). Upon electron beam shower, Zhao et al. [14] observed a freestanding 2D iron membrane confined in a graphene nanopore within TEM. Here, the 2D Fe membrane was transformed from Fe adsorbents introduced during graphene transfer onto TEM grids, i.e., etching Cu foil substrate with FeCl3 etchant. Other 2D metals can be analogously produced such as Cr, Mo, Au, Zr, and even 2D compounds, including Mo2C and ZnO [1923]. Such a confinement approach may have stemmed from the injection of metal atoms or fullerenes inside carbon nanotubes like peapods [24]. Also, one can imagine from materials science theory that condensation of nanoparticles occurs upon sintering in a confined space. In contrast, the outer surface of carbon nanotubes has served as a template for producing MoS2 or h-BN nanotubes [25].

2D Metals Squeezed by Sapphire/MoS2 Anvils

Recently, Zhang and colleagues [15] proposed a squeezing strategy for producing 2D metals in the interfaces of 2 MoS2 nanosheets. Here, metal pieces on a hot plate are melted into liquid and squeezed into a thin planar membrane by 2 MoS2-coated sapphire substrates, termed van der Waals anvils. Due to the coating of MoS2 epitaxially grown over a sapphire surface, one can achieve the atomically smooth surface of 2D metals by high-pressure squeezing. Here, the liquid metal often refers to Ga with a melting point around room temperature (30 °C). Other metals also show success in 2D metals [15] upon high-pressure squeezing, e.g., In, Sn, Bi, and Pb, with their melting point, 157, 232, 272, and 327 °C, respectively.

The idea may originate from the low-resistance metal/semiconductor contact in fabricating transistor devices. Indeed, metal and semiconductor contact in 2D material-based transistors become vital for elevating device performances. Such 2D metals may substitute the conventional low-melting-point metal alloys in electronic packaging as solder materials for electrical interconnect [2628].

Other Approaches for Obtaining 2D Metals

Selective extraction

Selective extraction often refers to the extraction of A layer from MAX phases by removing M and X elements, e.g., extracting Au layer from Ti3AuC2 phase. Here, Ti3AuC2 was synthesized by ion exchange intercalation of Ti3SiC2 MAX phase (the fifth row of Figure). Second, the Ti and C layers are selectively removed from Ti3AuC2 in etchants, such as Murakami’s reagent and cetrimonium bromide [18]. Eventually, 2D Au (goldene) forms and evidenced in the cross-section TEM images. This approach minimizes the consumption of Au in electrode applications of electronic devices.

Starting from the MXene monolayer Mo2Ti2C3, one can obtain nanoribbons of individual elements, e.g., graphene of C element or Mo nanoribbon. Here, Mo nanoribbon can be classified as 2D metal [29]. After irradiation of the electron beam for 2 min, the species experience structural transition, and atomic reconfiguration occurs. Eventually, Mo nanoribbon forms inside MXene nanopores.

Another example of selective extraction is Ag nanosheets by selective etching of Al in repeated folding and calendaring thinned Ag–Al stacked layers [30].

Growth over graphene templates

Metal Au possesses a face-centered cubic (fcc) phase. The Au square nanosheets were grown on templates [16]. First, Au3+ from HAuCl4 converts to Au+, which coordinates with surfactant into an AuCl–ligand complex on graphene. Then, the Au nanosheets (2.4 nm thick, 200 nm large) can be synthesized after removing the surfactant.

Self-assembly monolayer of metal precursors and CO reduction

The Pd complexes can chemisorb at the surface of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB; a surfactant), which experiences ligand exchange and reduction by CO introduction [17]. Eventually, Pd hexagonal nanosheets form from the emulsions proposed by Remita and colleagues [17].

Emerging Trends

Exciting approaches to synthesize 2D metals are summarized in this perspective. Also, the representative metal types of each method are listed. Besides, 2D metals show great applications in catalysis, superconductivity, and electric interconnect. Indeed, 2D metals are ideal contact electrodes for electronic and optoelectronic devices with 2D semiconductor channel materials. The van der Waals interaction may facilitate the low-resistance ohmic contact by suppressing the Schottky barrier [31].

However, 2D metals research still remains in its infancy stage. Thus far, a few one or few-atom-thick 2D metals are experimentally synthesized, including Bi, Pb, Sb, Sn, In, Ga, Fe, Pt, Pd, Au, Ag, Ir, and Ru. Theoretical calculation shows mechanical stability of 45 kinds of 2D metal patches suspended over graphene pores [32]. These mechanically robust 2D metals may also expand into large area film by van der Waals squeezing at liquefaction temperatures. In terms of growth, many hurdles require efforts to overcome, including thermodynamic stability, thickness regulation, monolayer growth, and upscale production. For conventional thermal deposition approaches, the suppression of surface/interface stress by modulating metal/substrate interaction may improve the quality of metal film with single or bi-atomic thickness. By molecular beam epitaxy method, more 2D metals can be deposited in templated growth fashion over other smooth and flat surfaces of single crystals, such as graphene, InSb, PbTe, and Ag.

For the applications, their intrinsic material properties should be regulated for engineering interfaces and integrating into devices. For example, the catalytic capability of 2D metals may be quantified and standardized compared to conventional nanoparticles and clusters [33]. Besides, artificial intelligence for computing may assist the discovery of new types of 2D metals [34]. Also, future efforts may be put into exploring the electronic, photonic, catalytic, and superconductivity performances of 2D metals.

Acknowledgments

Funding: W.Z. acknowledges the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFB3210400). J.P. thanks the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province for Excellent Young Scholars (YQ2022041) and the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (grant no. CSTB2024NSCQ-MSX0971). M.H.R. thanks the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 52071225), the European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation programme under the grant agreement no. 101087143 [Electron Beam Emergent Additive Manufacturing (EBEAM)], and REFRESH—Research Excellence For REgion Sustainability and High-tech Industries project no. CZ.10.03.01/00/22_003/0000048 via the Operational Programme Just Transition. Y.H. acknowledges the Key Research and Development Program of Jiangsu Province (BE2023009-2).

Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Dong C, Lu LS, Lin YC, Robinson JA. Air-stable, large-area 2D metals and semiconductors. ACS Nanosci Au. 2024;4(2):115–127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tao W, Kong N, Ji X, Zhang Y, Sharma A, Ouyang J, Qi B, Wang J, Xie N, Kang C, et al. Emerging two-dimensional monoelemental materials (Xenes) for biomedical applications. Chem Soc Rev. 2019;48:2891–2912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Maniyara RA, Rodrigo D, Yu R, Canet-Ferrer J, Ghosh DS, Yongsunthon R, Baker DE, Rezikyan A, García de Abajo FJ, Pruneri V. Tunable plasmons in ultrathin metal films. Nat Photonics. 2019;13:328–333. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhu FF, Chen WJ, Xu Y, Gao CL, Guan DD, Liu CH, Qian D, Zhang SC, Jia JF. Epitaxial growth of two-dimensional stanene. Nat Mater. 2015;14(10):1020–1025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Li S, Zhang H, Ruan H, Cheng Z, Yao Y, Zhuge F, Zhai T. Programmable nucleation and growth of ultrathin tellurium nanowires via a pulsed physical vapor deposition design. Adv Funct Mater. 2023;33(11):2211527. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Colin J, Jamnig A, Furgeaud C, Michel A, Pliatsikas N, Sarakinos K, Abadias G. In situ and real-time nanoscale monitoring of ultra-thin metal film growth using optical and electrical diagnostic tools. Nanomaterials. 2020;10(11):2225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Han JW, Jin HS, Kim YJ, Heo JS, Kim WH, Ahn JH, Kim JH, Park TJ. Advanced atomic layer deposition: Ultrathin and continuous metal thin film growth and work function control using the discrete feeding method. Nano Lett. 2022;22(11):4589–4595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kim H, Kim T, Kim M, Jeon J, Park GM, Kim SC, Won SO, Harada R, Kim S, Kim SK. Selective surface passivation for ultrathin and continuous metallic films via atomic layer deposition. Nano Lett. 2025;25(10):4101–4107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Politano A, Vitiello MS, Viti L, Boukhvalov DW, Chiarello G. The role of surface chemical reactivity in the stability of electronic nanodevices based on two-dimensional materials “beyond graphene” and topological insulators. FlatChem. 2017;1:60–64. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhang T, Cheng P, Li W-J, Sun Y-J, Wang G, Zhu X-G, He K, Wang L, Ma X, Chen X, et al. Superconductivity in one-atomic-layer metal films grown on Si(111). Nat Phys. 2010;6:104–108. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chen L, Wu AX, Tulu N, Wang J, Juanson A, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Pettes MT, Campbell MA, Xu M, et al. Exceptional electronic transport and quantum oscillations in thin bismuth crystals grown inside van der Waals materials. Nat Mater. 2024;23:741–746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Briggs N, Gebeyehu ZM, Vera A, Zhao T, Wang K, De La Fuente Duran A, Bersch B, Bowen T, Knappenberger KL Jr, Robinson JA. Epitaxial graphene/silicon carbide intercalation: A minireview on graphene modulation and unique 2D materials. Nanoscale. 2019;11:15440–15447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Briggs N, Bersch B, Wang Y, Jiang J, Koch RJ, Nayir N, Wang K, Kolmer M, Ko W, De La Fuente Duran A, et al. Atomically thin half-van der Waals metals enabled by confinement heteroepitaxy. Nat Mater. 2020;19(6):637–643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhao J, Deng Q, Bachmatiuk A, Sandeep G, Popov A, Eckert J, Rummeli MH. Free-standing single-atom-thick iron membranes suspended in graphene pores. Science. 2014;343(6176):1228–1232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhao J, Li L, Li P, Dai L, Dong J, Zhou L, Wang Y, Zhang P, Ji K, Zhang Y, et al. Realization of 2D metals at the angstrom thickness limit. Nature. 2025;639(8054):354–359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Huang X, Li S, Huang Y, Wu S, Zhou X, Li S, Gan CL, Boey F, Mirkin CA, Zhang H. Synthesis of hexagonal close-packed gold nanostructures. Nat Commun. 2011;2:292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Siril PF, Ramos L, Beaunier P, Archirel P, Etcheberry A, Remita H. Synthesis of ultrathin hexagonal palladium nanosheets. Chem Mater. 2009;21(21):5170–5175. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kashiwaya S, Shi Y, Lu J, Sangiovanni DG, Greczynski G, Magnuson M, Andersson M, Rosen J, Hultman L. Synthesis of goldene comprising single-atom layer gold. Nat Synth. 2024;3:744–751. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ta HQ, Mendes RG, Liu Y, Yang X, Luo J, Bachmatiuk A, Gemming T, Zeng M, Fu L, Liu L, et al. In situ fabrication of freestanding single-atom-thick 2D metal/metallene and 2D metal/metallene oxide membranes: Recent developments. Adv Sci. 2021;8:e2100619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhao L, Ta HQ, Mendes RG, Bachmatiuk A, Rummeli MH. In situ observations of freestanding single-atom-thick gold nanoribbons suspended in graphene. Adv Mater Interfaces. 2020;7:2000436. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ta HQ, Yang QX, Liu S, Bachmatiuk A, Mendes RG, Gemming T, Liu Y, Liu L, Tokarska K, Patel RB, et al. In situ formation of free-standing single-atom-thick antiferromagnetic chromium membranes. Nano Lett. 2020;20(6):4354–4361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Si J, Zeng M, Ta HQ, Zheng S, Liao J, Yang X, Rummeli MH, Fu L. Adsorption-free growth of ultra-thin molybdenum membranes with a low-symmetry rectangular lattice structure. Small. 2020;16:e2001325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mendes RG, Ta HQ, Gemming T, Gog H, Huis MA, Bachmatiuk A, Rümmeli MH. In situ growth of suspended zirconene islets inside graphene pores. Adv Funct Mater. 2024;35(2):2412889. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hornbaker DJ, Kahng SJ, Misra S, Smith BW, Johnson AT, Mele EJ, Luzzi DE, Yazdani A. Mapping the one-dimensional electronic states of nanotube peapod structures. Science. 2002;295(5556):828–831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Xiang R, Inoue T, Zheng Y, Kumamoto A, Qian Y, Sato Y, Liu M, Tang D, Gokhale D, Guo J, et al. One-dimensional van der Waals heterostructures. Science. 2020;367(1):537–542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Dolzhnikov DS, Zhang H, Jang J, Son JS, Panthani MG, Shibata T, Chattopadhyay S, Talapin DV. Materials chemistry. Composition-matched molecular “solders” for semiconductors. Science. 2015;347(6220):425–428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nair RR, Wolansky J, Uhlig K, Solgi A, Teuerle L, Zhang T, Schroder J, Antrack T, Benduhn J, Kleemann H, et al. Leaftronics: Natural lignocellulose scaffolds for sustainable electronics. Sci Adv. 2024;10:eadq3276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hu H, Zhu X, Wang C, Zhang L, Li X, Lee S, Huang Z, Chen R, Chen Z, Wang C, et al. Stretchable ultrasonic transducer arrays for three-dimensional imaging on complex surfaces. Sci Adv. 2018;4(3):eaar3979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mendes RG, Ta HQ, Yang X, Li W, Bachmatiuk A, Choi JH, Gemming T, Anasori B, Lijun L, Fu L, et al. In situ N-doped graphene and Mo nanoribbon formation from Mo2Ti2C3 MXene monolayers. Small. 2020;16(5):1907115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Liu H, Tang H, Fang M, Si W, Zhang Q, Huang Z, Gu L, Pan W, Yao J, Nan C, et al. 2D metals by repeated size reduction. Adv Mater. 2016;28(37):8170–8176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.He Z, Guan H, Liang X, Chen J, Xie M, Luo K, An R, Ma L, Ma F, Yang T, et al. Broadband, polarization-sensitive, and self-powered high-performance photodetection of hetero-integrated MoS2 on lithium niobate. Research. 2023;6:0199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Nevalaita J, Koskinen P. Atlas for the properties of elemental two-dimensional metals. Phys Rev B. 2018;97(3): Article 035411. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hou Y, Lan Y, Qian C, Zhou S. Direct conversion of methane to propylene. Research. 2023;6:0218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Jiao L, Zhao J, Wang C, Liu X, Liu F, Li L, Shang R, Li Y, Ma W, Yang S. Nature-inspired intelligent computing: A comprehensive survey. Research. 2024;7:0442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Research are provided here courtesy of American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) and Science and Technology Review Publishing House

RESOURCES