Skip to main content
PMC home page
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 2000 Apr 4;162(7):993–996.

Dilution of the 75-g oral glucose tolerance test increases postprandial glycemia: implications for diagnostic criteria

J L Sievenpiper 1, D J Jenkins 1, R G Josse 1, V Vuksan 1
PMCID: PMC1232351  PMID: 10763397

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dilution has been noticed to increase the glycemic response to various sugars, including glucose. This effect may contribute to the poor reproducibility of the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). To test this hypothesis we assessed the effect of diluting a 75-g OGTT on 2-hour postprandial blood glucose based diagnostic outcomes, incremental glycemia and area under the glucose curve. METHODS: On 3 different occasions, 10 subjects (mean age 40 [and standard error of the mean (SEM) 3.2] years; mean body mass index 27.2 [and SEM 1.2] kg/m2) without previously diagnosed dysglycemia were given a 300-mL, 600-mL or 900-mL 75-g OGTT in random order. The protocol followed the American Diabetes Association's guidelines. Finger-prick capillary blood samples were obtained at fasting and then 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after the start of the test. RESULTS: At 30, 45 and 60 minutes, incremental glycemic concentrations were significantly higher with the 900-mL meal (means [and SEMs]: 4.9 [0.4] mmol/L, 5.1 [0.6] mmol/L and 4.6 [0.8] mmol/L, respectively) than with the 600-mL (means [and SEMs]: 4.0 [0.3] mmol/L, 4.2 [0.6] mmol/L and 3.6 [0.7] mmol/L, respectively) and the 300-mL meals (means and [SEMs]: 3.8 [0.5] mmol/L, 4.0 [0.5] mmol/L and 3.2 [0.6] mmol/L, respectively) (p < 0.05). The same was true for peak incremental blood glucose, regardless of time (p < 0.05). The area under the curve for the 900-mL meal (mean [and SEM] 404 [57] min.mmol/L) was significantly higher than for the 600-mL (mean [and SEM] 331 [51] min.mmol/L) and 300-mL meals (mean [and SEM] 280 [48] min.mmol/L) (p < 0.05). No other significant differences were observed. INTERPRETATION: Dilution of the 75-g OGTT will likely not affect current screening practices that use 2-h postprandial glucose levels as the basis for diagnosis. It may, however, bias the interpretation of older criteria that rely on intermediate time points because these midpoints appear to be sensitive to alterations in the total volume of the meal ingested.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (208.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Elks M. L. Oral glucose tolerance tests. Diabetes Care. 1996 Mar;19(3):271–271. doi: 10.2337/diacare.19.3.271a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Harris M. I., Flegal K. M., Cowie C. C., Eberhardt M. S., Goldstein D. E., Little R. R., Wiedmeyer H. M., Byrd-Holt D. D. Prevalence of diabetes, impaired fasting glucose, and impaired glucose tolerance in U.S. adults. The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994. Diabetes Care. 1998 Apr;21(4):518–524. doi: 10.2337/diacare.21.4.518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Horowitz M., Edelbroek M. A., Wishart J. M., Straathof J. W. Relationship between oral glucose tolerance and gastric emptying in normal healthy subjects. Diabetologia. 1993 Sep;36(9):857–862. doi: 10.1007/BF00400362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hunt J. N., Smith J. L., Jiang C. L. Effect of meal volume and energy density on the gastric emptying of carbohydrates. Gastroenterology. 1985 Dec;89(6):1326–1330. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(85)90650-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Meltzer S., Leiter L., Daneman D., Gerstein H. C., Lau D., Ludwig S., Yale J. F., Zinman B., Lillie D. 1998 clinical practice guidelines for the management of diabetes in Canada. Canadian Diabetes Association. CMAJ. 1998;159 (Suppl 8):S1–29. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mourot J., Thouvenot P., Couet C., Antoine J. M., Krobicka A., Debry G. Relationship between the rate of gastric emptying and glucose and insulin responses to starchy foods in young healthy adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 1988 Oct;48(4):1035–1040. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/48.4.1035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Schwartz J. G., Phillips W. T., Blumhardt M. R., Langer O. Use of a more physiologic oral glucose solution during screening for gestational diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Sep;171(3):685–691. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(94)90082-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sievenpiper J. L., Vuksan V., Wong E. Y., Mendelson R. A., Bruce-Thompson C. Effect of meal dilution on the postprandial glycemic response. Implications for glycemic testing. Diabetes Care. 1998 May;21(5):711–716. doi: 10.2337/diacare.21.5.711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sole C. C., Noakes T. D. Faster gastric emptying for glucose-polymer and fructose solutions than for glucose in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1989;58(6):605–612. doi: 10.1007/BF00418506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Stolk R. P., Orchard T. J., Grobbee D. E. Why use the oral glucose tolerance test? Diabetes Care. 1995 Jul;18(7):1045–1049. doi: 10.2337/diacare.18.7.1045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Thompson D. G., Wingate D. L., Thomas M., Harrison D. Gastric emptying as a determinant of the oral glucose tolerance test. Gastroenterology. 1982 Jan;82(1):51–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Torsdottir I., Andersson H. Effect on the postprandial glycaemic level of the addition of water to a meal ingested by healthy subjects and type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients. Diabetologia. 1989 Apr;32(4):231–235. doi: 10.1007/BF00285289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wolever T. M., Jenkins D. J. The use of the glycemic index in predicting the blood glucose response to mixed meals. Am J Clin Nutr. 1986 Jan;43(1):167–172. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/43.1.167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES