Skip to main content
Open Research Europe logoLink to Open Research Europe
. 2025 Mar 24;5:77. [Version 1] doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.19149.1

Dimensions, stability, and deformability of DOPC-cholesterol giant unilamellar vesicles formed by droplet transfer

Elisa Roberti 1,a, Elisa Linda Petrocelli 2, Dario Cecchi 1, Stefano Palagi 1,b
PMCID: PMC12326166  PMID: 40771874

Abstract

Background

Understanding cell membrane-like lipid bilayers is crucial for studying fundamental biological mechanisms. Giant Unilamellar Vesicles (GUVs) are key tools for this investigation and have applications in both synthetic biology and, more recently, in microrobotics. The effects of cholesterol, a key component of cellular membranes, on synthetic phospholipid membrane models like GUVs are however not fully understood, as they may vary with lipid composition and production method.

Methods

We examined the size distribution, temporal stability and deformability of GUVs prepared with the droplet transfer method using different Dioleoylphosphatidylcholine (DOPC) to cholesterol ratios in the oil phase (namely 100:0, 85:15, 71:29, 60:40). Phase-contrast microscopy assessed size and stability, while deformability was tested by loading the GUVs with an aqueous ferrofluid and applying a uniform magnetic field to induce their elongation. Image analysis was conducted using Fiji and a custom Julia script.

Results

The median diameters increased with the content of cholesterol, together with the dimensional distribution. In terms of stability, cholesterol generally reduced GUV median diameter over time, while it varyingly influenced the number of vesicles. As for deformability, beyond the expected elongation dependent on the intensity of the applied magnetic field, there were no statistically significant differences in GUV deformability in the presence or absence of cholesterol.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that cholesterol can lead to increased average diameter of GUVs made with DOPC through droplet transfer, while varyingly affecting their time-stability and not affecting their deformability. This study shows how small adjustments on a straightforward protocol like the droplet transfer method, provide a simple and effective way of tailoring GUV properties. Edits in the oil phase enable precise tuning of GUV membranes providing a tool for both fundamental studies and applications such as artificial cells or microrobots.

Keywords: GUVs, droplet transfer, cholesterol, artificial cells, microrobots, deformability

Plain language summary

Cell membranes play a key role in the overall functioning of cells and their environmental interactions. For a better understanding of their mechanisms, a common tool is represented by Giant Unilamellar Vesicles (GUVs). These micrometric vesicles are produced through the supramolecular assembly of phospholipids, the main molecule of cell membranes, and used to explore basic biological processes, build synthetic cells, and even design microrobots. Here we study the effects that cholesterol, a key component of natural cell membranes, has on GUVs’ membrane properties. While these can vary with the production method and the types of lipids, in this study we focus on one of the most widely adopted methods (known as droplet transfer) and one of the most common phospholipids (dioleoylphosphatidylcholine or DOPC). Our results suggest that the effect of cholesterol on the size and stability of GUVs depends on its concentration, while their flexibility seems not to be affected. By exploring these properties, we aim to deepen our understanding of cell membranes and improve the design of synthetic systems for future applications.

Introduction

Understanding cell lipid bilayers is crucial for deciphering fundamental biological mechanisms, considering their central role in various cellular processes. Insights into lipid bilayer behaviour enhance our understanding of general cellular mechanisms and the functional diversities among different cell types. To this end, synthetic lipid bilayers have long served as a fundamental tool to model biological membranes ( Dimova, 2019; Kahya & Schwille, 2006; Laurence et al., 2022; Menger & Keiper, 1998; Toparlak & Mansy, 2019; Wubshet & Liu, 2023) and these supramolecular assemblies are also of great interest from an application perspective. Due to their selective permeability and ease of fabrication, lipid bilayers have been utilised in synthetic biology for the past two decades ( Robinson et al., 2021; Van de Cauter et al., 2023) and, more recently, in the field of microrobotics ( Sato et al., 2017; Vutukuri et al., 2020). Giant Unilamellar Vesicles (GUVs), liposomes with diameters ranging from 1 to 100 micrometres, have a single phospholipid bilayer that is commonly used as a lipid membrane model for characterization studies and technological applications.

In cells, the composition of the plasma membrane varies according to the cell function ( Casares et al., 2019), but also in response to pathological ( Woodman & Kim, n.d.), nutritional ( Agostoni et al., 2013), and pharmacological treatment conditions ( Escribá et al., 2015). Characterizing the effects of variations in the composition of lipid bilayers can yield valuable insights into cell membrane behaviour, while also facilitating applications such as vesicle-based artificial cells and microrobots. Whether the goal is to understand cell membrane behaviour or to develop vesicle-based microrobots and artificial cells, it is crucial to examine how the membrane composition influences the dimensions, stability, and deformability of GUVs. One important property influencing the mechanical behaviour of cells and vesicles is the bending rigidity of the membrane, which quantifies its resistance to changes in curvature ( Wubshet & Liu, 2023). It is well known that bending rigidity is influenced by a multitude of factors such as the hydrophobic tails’ chain length and saturation ( Rawicz et al., 2000), the temperature ( Pan et al., 2008b), the presence of charged lipids ( Dimova, 2014; Faizi et al., 2019) the concentration of sugars or salts ( Dimova, 2014), and the presence of sterols like cholesterol ( Chen & Rand, 1997; Dimova, 2014; Gracià et al., 2010a; Karal et al., 2022).

Cholesterol is a crucial element of biological systems, constituting up to 50 mol% of the total lipid content of the membrane ( Karal et al., 2020a) but its effects on synthetic membrane models, like GUVs, are not yet completely elucidated. The role of cholesterol in influencing membrane deformability remains a subject of ongoing debate. It is widely accepted that cholesterol has different effects on membranes depending on their constituting phospholipids ( Pan et al., 2008a). The bending rigidity of saturated lipids membranes increases with cholesterol content, while in membranes composed of double unsaturated lipids, like dioleoylphosphatidylcholine (DOPC), the rigidity seems to be independent of cholesterol fraction ( Dimova, 2014; Gracià et al., 2010a; Pan et al., 2008a; Sorre et al., 2009). Nonetheless, some evidence suggests the opposite behaviour with the bending rigidity of DOPC membranes increasing alongside the cholesterol content ( Ashkar et al., 2019; Chakraborty et al., 2020).

To assess the role of cholesterol in lipid membrane models, the effects were previously tested on GUVs fabricated with the swelling method ( Chakraborty et al., 2020; Gracià et al., 2010b), revealing its influence on both the average size of vesicles and the membrane’s bending modulus ( Karal et al., 2022). While this technique offers a simple and reliable method to obtain GUVs, its use is preferably avoided when aiming at encapsulating solutions and cargos within the vesicles. For the fabrication of artificial cells or microrobots, a more advantageous alternative is provided by the droplet transfer method ( Pautot et al., 2003), which allows for higher efficiency of encapsulation of valuable internal GUV solutions, such as cell-free protein synthesis reactions ( Garenne et al., 2021; Shimane & Kuruma, 2022) or microparticles ( Vutukuri et al., 2020). Because the method is based on the dissolution of phospholipids into an oil phase and the formation of bilayers from their spontaneous adsorption at oil-water interfaces, it is important to consider that other organic molecules present in or added to the oil phase, like cholesterol, may or may not contribute to the membrane. Consequently, cholesterol cannot be assumed to affect droplet transfer-made GUVs in the same manner it affects GUVs produced by other methods.

In this work, we study how the addition of cholesterol affects GUVs prepared with the droplet transfer method in terms of size distribution, temporal stability and deformability of the vesicles. We use the commonly adopted double unsaturated DOPC as the membrane’s main constituent and mineral oil as an organic solvent. Cholesterol is added in different proportions to the DOPC-oil lipid solution and vesicles are produced keeping all other process parameters unvaried. To assess the deformation of the vesicles, we used a custom setup equipped with two permanent magnets, generating a uniform magnetic field, and an inner solution containing ferrofluid. Given the well-known stabilizing effects of cholesterol ( Zhang et al., 2019), we also examined the impact of this lipid on the temporal stability of our membranes.

Methods

The following materials were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich ® (St. Louis, MO): DOPC (1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine, in chloroform, C44H84NO8P, cat. 850375C-1G, CAS: 4235-95-4), sucrose ≥99.5% (GC) (α-D-Glucopyranosyl β-D-fructofuranoside, C12H22O11, cat. S9378-500G, CAS: 57-50-1), D-(+)-Glucose ≥99.5% (GC) (C6H12O6, cat. G8270-100G, CAS: 50-99-7), and cholesterol powder (3β-Hydroxy-5-cholestene, C27H46O, cat. C3045-5G, CAS: 57-88-5). The aqueous ferrofluid, containing approximately 20% by weight of 10 nm magnetite nanoparticles stabilized with citrate, was purchased from Qfluidics (France). Additionally, the neodymium N42 nickel-plated permanent magnets were sourced from Supermagnete (cat. Q-15-15-08-N). The experimental setup utilized for deformability tests was designed using Computer-Aided Design (CAD) software (e.g. Autodesk Fusion 360) and subsequently 3D printed in VisiJet M3 Crystal material (3D Systems Projet MJP 3600 HD Max). Gene Frames (250 µm thickness and 1 cm 2 area) for microscope glass slides were obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific (cat. AB0576).

Preparation of stock solutions

Two lipid stock solutions were prepared in mineral oil, one at 2.5 mg/mL (3.18 mM) DOPC and one at 0.79 mg/mL (2 mM) cholesterol. Lipids dissolved in chloroform were transferred onto a glass vial, then the chloroform was evaporated through a nitrogen flow, allowing the formation of a thin film of dried phospholipids. Finally, the mineral oil was added, and the lipids were dissolved by heating at 80°C for one hour. The stock was then stored at 4°C.

Two inner solutions and one bottom solution were prepared using milliQ water. One inner solution was prepared with 240 mM sucrose, and the other with 1:2 (v/v) ferrofluid:sucrose 240 mM, while the bottom solution was prepared with 240 mM glucose. Both solutions were filtered with a 0.22 µm microfilter and then stored at +4°C.

Preparation of GUVs through droplet transfer

GUVs were prepared following a modified version of the droplet transfer method ( Pautot et al., 2003). 200 µL of lipid stock solution were transferred in a 2 mL tube, sonicated for 10 minutes in a bath sonicator (Ultrasonic cleaner Brown Sonic 2510E-MTH), and cooled on ice for 15 minutes. An emulsion was then prepared by adding 10 µL of inner solution to the tube, vortexing the mixture for 25 seconds at 3000 rpm (Vortex WIZARD IR, VWR cat. # 444-0746) and chilling it for 10 minutes on ice. 300 µL of bottom solution were transferred in a 1.5 mL tube and placed on ice. Then 100 µL of lipid stock solution were layered on top of the bottom solution to allow for the spontaneous formation of a lipid monolayer at the water/oil interface. The emulsion was then layered on top of the interface and centrifuged for 20 minutes at 3300g at 4°C. Finally, the oil phase was removed with a pipette and the liposomes were resuspended from the pellet.

For the preparation of GUVs with cholesterol, oil mixes composed of DOPC and cholesterol at different molar ratios were prepared following the previously reported analysis on GUVs made with the swelling method ( Karal et al., 2022): 85:15, 71:29, and 60:40. DOPC concentration was kept constant at 1.25 mg/mL (1.59 mM) and the cholesterol concentration varied according to the molar ratio.

Observation and data analysis of GUVs

After removing the oil phase with a micropipette and resuspending the liposomes, a 25 µL aliquot of the sample was placed onto a glass slide within a Gene Frame and covered with a coverslip. Samples were then observed in phase contrast through the inverted microscope Nikon Eclipse TE2000-U, equipped with a 20x/0.40 Ph1 ADL objective at a working distance (WD) of 3.1. Images of the entire frame area were captured. To investigate the effects of cholesterol on the size distribution of GUVs and to ensure consistent observation and statistical analysis of how cholesterol influences vesicle size distribution, triplicate samples of the four compositions (DOPC:Chol 100:0, 85:15, 71:29, and 60:40) were produced and analysed. To ensure comparability during analysis, approximately 120 images were acquired for each sample. For the analysis of vesicle stability, triplicate samples of DOPC:Chol 100:0, 85:15, 71:29, and 60:40 were stored overnight at 4°C and observed again on the following day. In this case, 100 images were captured for each sample. The acquired images were analysed with Fiji ImageJ ( https://imagej.net/software/fiji/). For each image, GUVs were identified, and their areas were measured using the tools provided by ImageJ. The collected data were analysed with a custom script implemented in the Julia language ( https://julialang.org/) that calculates the diameter of the GUVs from their area (assuming them as round), evaluates whether the differences between samples are statistically significant, fits the data to a distribution function, and plots the data and analysis results ( Roberti et al., 2024a). Because the diameters are assumed to have a lognormal distribution, the statistical significance tests (F-test and t-test) are not performed on the diameters data but on the natural logarithm of the diameters. Fitting the diameters to lognormal distributions, we also calculate mode (i.e. the peak of the distribution), median, and percentiles of the distribution of each sample. Finally, we have calculated the total surface area of all observed vesicles as the sum of the individual surface areas (assuming them as spherical), and compared the results obtained for as-prepared samples with those for overnight-stored samples. This comprehensive approach aims to assess the impact of cholesterol on the vesicle size distribution and stability.

Observation and data analysis of magneto-GUVs

The characterization of magnetic GUVs and the observation of their deformability under the influence of an external magnetic field were carried out using a digital 3D optical microscope (Hirox RH-2000). To observe deformation, the sample was subjected to an external magnetic field generated by a pair of permanent magnets kept at specific distances by a custom 3D printed setup( Roberti et al., 2024b). The magnets are oriented with the poles in the same direction and placed at equal distances to the observation area at the centre of the device. The superposition of the magnetic fields results in a homogeneous magnetic field in the observation area. 25 µL of the sample were placed on a microscope glass slide inside a Gene frame and covered with a coverslip. All samples were initially observed without the application of a magnetic field. Subsequently, the glass slide was placed at the centre of the magnetic setup and the magnetic field intensity was varied by changing the distance between the magnets. Three different distances between the magnets were considered for our analysis: 13, 10 and 4 cm, resulting in magnetic fields of 2.0, 4.7, and 48.0 mT, respectively, which we named H1, H2 and H3( Roberti et al., 2024a). The images were subsequently analysed using ImageJ and each GUV was treated as an ellipse, collecting data on area, major axis, and minor axis. Data were then analysed with a script implemented in Julia ( Roberti et al., 2024a).

The vesicles are assumed to have a spherical shape at rest and to achieve an ellipsoidal shape (namely a prolate spheroidal shape) under the action of a magnetic field. The long axis of the ellipsoid is aligned with the orientation of the magnetic field (see Figure 1).

Figure 1. Schematics of the GUVs’ dimensions and the related rest radius.

Figure 1.

Given the major and minor axis a and b of the spheroid, its volume can be calculated as V=43πab2 . Assuming that the volume of the vesicle does not change with the magnetic elongation, we can estimate the rest radius as R0=ab23 (and thus the rest diameter). This means, however, that the apparent surface of the vesicles increases, as the membrane spreads out. We thus calculate the surface area of a sphere having a radius equal to the rest radius, Ss=4πR02 , and assumed it to be the rest apparent surface area of the vesicle. We also calculated the surface area of the vesicles in the observed prolate spheroidal shape as to S ps = 2 π b 2 (1 + a / be arcsin e), where e 2 = 1 – b 2 / a 2 . As we are interested in the effect of the lipidic composition of the membrane on the deformability of the vesicles, we then evaluated the surface area deformation as σ = S ps/ S s – 1. Statistical significance tests on σ are performed assuming a lognormal distribution.

Results

Size distribution

We prepared GUVs by the droplet transfer method at different DOPC:cholesterol ratios, namely 100:0 (no cholesterol), 85:15, 71:29, and 60:40, in the lipid solution ( Figure 2). Right after preparation (t 0), we observed 247, 279,190, and 394 vesicles, respectively, in the sample aliquot (see Figure 3B left side / bright colour). Assuming a lognormal distribution of the diameters within each sample (see Methods), we found that the dimensional differences between all combinations of samples are statistically significant (p < 0.05). Moreover, as the concentration of cholesterol in the lipid solution increased, the maximum observed diameter of vesicles increased.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Representative phase-contrast images of A) DOPC:chol 100:0, B) DOPC:chol 85:15, C) DOPC:chol 79:21, D) DOPC:chol 60.40. Scale bars = 50 μm.

Figure 3. Comparison of vesicles prepared with lipid solutions (LSs) at different concentrations of cholesterol, as prepared (t 0) and after overnight storage (o.n.).

Figure 3.

A) measured diameters of the vesicles; B) number of observed vesicles; C) median (solid lines), mode (peak – dashed lines) and 5 th to 95 th percentile (coloured areas) of the lognormal distributions fitted to the diameters data.

Fitting lognormal distributions to the diameters data, we found that the median diameter (geometric mean of the distribution) increased with the content of cholesterol in the lipid solution consistent with what was described in previous studies ( Karal et al., 2020b; Karal et al., 2022). The estimated median diameters are 12.1, 14.5, 17.3 and 21.5 µm, respectively for 100:0, 85:15, 71:29, and 60:40 distributions (see Figure 3C, solid lines – left side / bright colour). The coloured bars in Figure 3C represent the dimensions of vesicles within the 5 th and 95 th percentile of the distributions: it can be noticed that the main difference among samples with increasing concentrations of cholesterol in the lipid solution is the increase in the 95 th percentile value and, thus, in the width of the distribution.

Temporal stability

To investigate the impact of cholesterol on the stability of the GUV membrane, samples were stored overnight at 4°C and observed at the phase-contrast microscope the following day. For each sample, we recorded the number of vesicles observed in a new aliquot and their dimensional distribution (see Figure 3 – right sides / dark colours). When cholesterol was absent (sample 100:0), the total number of observed GUVs almost halved and the median diameter from the fitted lognormal distribution increased with a general shift towards larger diameters. Conversely, for the cholesterol-containing samples, a general shift towards smaller diameters was observed with a decrease in the upper limit of the distribution (95 th percentile) compared to the no-cholesterol samples. With the highest cholesterol concentration (60:40), both the number of vesicles and the median diameter decreased overnight. For the intermediate cases (85:15 and 79:21), instead, the number of GUVs increased while the median diameter decreased. In particular, for the 85:15 samples, the number of vesicles more than doubled and the median diameter decreased.

Finally, we estimated the total surface area A s of vesicles and observed a decrease in all the samples (especially in those with the highest cholesterol concentration) except for the 85:15 sample where, surprisingly, the total surface area almost doubled overnight ( Table 1).

Table 1. Overnight variations in GUV populations.

Median diameters were calculated assuming a lognormal distribution (see Methods).

DOPC:
cholesterol
Median
diameter at t = 0
Median diameter after
overnight storage
Count at
t = 0
Count after
overnight storage
Aso.n.Ast=0
100:0 12.1 µm 16.1 µm 247 129 82 %
85:15 14.5 µm 11.9 µm 190 491 198 %
71:29 17.3 µm 12.3 µm 279 389 66 %
60:40 21.5 µm 13.4 µm 394 289 20 %

Deformation under magnetic fields

As ferrofluid-loaded vesicles undergo magnetic field-dependent elongation ( Nuñez-Magos et al., 2021), we exposed GUVs to uniform magnetic fields in order to investigate a potential correlation between their deformability and the presence of cholesterol in their membrane (see Observation and data analysis of magneto-GUVs). Following the application of the magnetic field, the vesicles exhibit a prolate shape, elongating in the direction of the field. Additionally, they tend to aggregate due to magnetic dipole-dipole interactions thus assembling in chains, as shown in Figure 4. For each measured vesicle, we calculated the surface area deformation σ with respect to an ideal spherical rest configuration. The results, reported in Figure 5, show that, as expected, the deformation increases with the intensity of the applied magnetic field, with some vesicles undergoing a surface area deformation of about 40% at the highest-intensity magnetic field. Although it can be observed in Figure 5 that 100:0 samples have one or few outliers with large deformations, whereas this is not observed in the 60:40 samples, the differences in surface area deformation between the two samples are not statistically significant. This suggests that cholesterol does not affect the mechanical properties of lipid bilayers.

Figure 4. DOPC:chol 60:40 GUVs ( A- C) and 100:0 ( D- F) deform under increasing magnetic field: H1( A, D); H2( B, E); H3( C, F). Scale bars: 100 µm.

Figure 4.

Figure 5. Comparison of σ values for DOPC:chol 100:0 and 60:40 under increasing magnetic fields.

Figure 5.

Discussions and conclusions

Cholesterol is a crucial component of cellular membranes that influences their physical properties by modifying the spatial organisation of phospholipid acyl chains. Due to this significance, cholesterol has been employed in the production of GUVs, both as models in biophysics studies and as semi-permeable shells for artificial cells. The effect of cholesterol on GUVs’ average size and their membrane’s bending modulus has been previously analysed for vesicles prepared through the swelling method ( Chakraborty et al., 2020; Gracià et al., 2010b; Karal et al., 2022). In our study, we evaluated the effect of cholesterol on GUVs prepared with the droplet transfer method, where phospholipids and cholesterol are dissolved in an oil phase and the bilayer’s assembly is mediated by the water/oil interface. Given the unclear partition coefficient of cholesterol in oil and in the bilayer, we aimed to estimate cholesterol's influence on droplet transfer-based GUVs, if any.

To this end, we examined the dimensional distribution, temporal stability, and deformability of GUVs with various lipid compositions produced through the droplet transfer method. Specifically, we fabricated vesicles with DOPC and different cholesterol ratios (100:0, 85:15, 71:29, 60:40). Our observations revealed that an increase in cholesterol ratio correlates with a higher average diameter of GUVs. This aligns with the previously observed role of cholesterol in lipid bilayers. Indeed, due to its hydrophobicity, cholesterol is likely embedded within the bilayer, reducing the trans-gauche isomerization of the neighbouring lipid acyl chains. This decreases their dynamics and fluidity, thereby stabilizing the membranes and leading to larger-diameter vesicles ( Yang et al., 2016). We also analysed how cholesterol affects the temporal stability of GUV membranes. All four samples were stored overnight and observed the following day using a phase contrast microscope. GUVs without cholesterol (DOPC:Chol 100:0) were fewer in number but larger in size compared to the freshly prepared samples (t 0), possibly indicating a tendency to fusion. On the other hand, cholesterol-containing GUVs undergo a reduction of the mean diameter overnight, more evident in the sample with the highest cholesterol concentration. The 85:15 and 71:29 samples showed an increase in vesicle numbers compared to t 0, while the 60:40 sample faced a reduction in numbers after an overnight incubation. Although we could not verify this, it is possible that in lower cholesterol samples larger GUVs split into smaller ones, while GUVs with the highest cholesterol content burst into either lipid aggregates or small liposomes undetectable at the microscope.

To investigate whether cholesterol addition enhances or hinders GUV deformability, we applied a magnetic field to provide mechanical stress to the lipid membranes. With the use of two permanent magnets and by encapsulating aqueous ferrofluid, we fabricated magnetic GUVs and exposed them to three intensities of a uniform magnetic field. The GUVs, initially spherical, became ellipsoidal under the magnetic field, with compression increasing alongside the magnetic field intensity ( Figure 5). Interestingly, GUVs remained stable and did not break under the magnetic field. Since it was not possible to observe any significant difference in GUVs deformability, we concluded that cholesterol does not have a clear influence on membrane rigidity, at least not to an extent observable with our technique.

In this work, we evaluated how cholesterol affects the size, stability, and deformability of DOPC GUVs obtained with the droplet transfer method. Given the debated stiffening effect of cholesterol on the bilayer, we investigated its role in our specific case. We can conclude that cholesterol, when added to DOPC vesicles prepared via the droplet transfer method, significantly increases the vesicle diameter but does not seem to have a drastic effect on their deformability. Nonetheless, it should be noted that the method we used to evaluate deformability does not allow us to assess potential local effects that could impact stability if proteins or channels were added. Overall, we can say that the GUVs do not appear to vary in their ability to deform following the addition of cholesterol to the bilayer.

Ethical consideration

Ethical approval and consent were not required,

Acknowledgements

We thank Nicodemo Funaro for designing and 3D-printing the holder for the permanent magnets. We also extend our gratitude to Francesco Bianciardi for his support in developing the magnetic GUVs.

Funding Statement

This project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the [European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme][European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation programme] (Grant agreement No. [948590]).

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

[version 1; peer review: 4 approved with reservations]

Data and software availability

Underlying data

Zenodo: Dimensions, stability and deformability of DOPC-cholesterol Giant Unilamellar Vesicles formed by droplet transfer https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14267071( Roberti et al., 2024a)

This dataset contains the following underlying data:

  • “Manifest.toml” Julia computational environment file

  • “Project.toml” Julia computational environment file

  • “_init.jl” script initialising the Julia computational environment based on the “Manifest.toml” and “Project.toml” files

  • “deformability.jl” script to analyse the magnetic deformation of ferrofluid-loaded GUVs with and without cholesterol

  • “size_distribution_stability.jl” script to analyse the size distribution and overnight stability of GUVs with different DOPC:Chol ratios

  • “data” folder containing the datasets with the sizes of all the observed GUVs

    • GUVs_stability_ON

    • GUVs_stability_T0

    • GUVs_with_cholesterol_6040_1

    • GUVs_with_cholesterol_6040_2

    • GUVs_with_cholesterol_6040_3

    • GUVs_without_cholesterol_1

    • GUVs_without_cholesterol_2

    • GUVs_without_cholesterol_3

  • “utilities” folder containing the script to calculate the magnetic field generated by our permanent magnets device

    • “magnetic_fields.jl”

Extended data

Zenodo: Dimensions, stability and deformability of DOPC-cholesterol Giant Unilamellar Vesicles formed by droplet transfer https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14268212( Roberti et al., 2024b)

This dataset contains the following extended data:

  • “deformation_size” folder containing scatter plots of σ with respect to GUVs rest radii

    • sd_deform_scatter_H1

    • sd_deform_scatter_H2

    • sd_deform_scatter_H3

  • “magnetic_device_support” folder containing the .stl files for 3D-printing the magnets-support of the magnetic device

    • magnetic_device_support_part1

    • magnetic_device_support_part2

  • “size_distribution_magnetic” folder containing size distribution histograms comparing 100:0 DOPC:cholesterol and 60:40 DOPC:cholesterol samples, under the application of magnetic fields

    • sd_magnetic_size_dist_allfields

    • sd_magnetic_size_dist_H1

    • sd_magnetic_size_dist_H2

    • sd_magnetic_size_dist_H3

  • “size_distribution_T0vsON” folder containing size distribution histograms comparing pristine samples (t 0) and samples after overnight storage (ON), for different DOPC:cholesterol ratios

    • sd_size_dist_60_40

    • sd_size_dist_71_29

    • sd_size_dist_85_15

    • sd_size_dist_100_0

Software availability

The software consists of two custom scripts, written specifically for analysing the data of this work, together with files for reproducing the computational environment required to run the scripts. The software files are provided with the data files in the Underlying Data dataset of this paper.

Archived software available from: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14267071

License: CC-BY 4.0

General use functions originally developed for analysing this work’s data are collected in a GitHub repository.

Source code available from: https://github.com/microrobotlab/GUV-dimensional-analysis

Archived software available from: https://github.com/microrobotlab/GUV-dimensional-analysis/releases/tag/v1.0

License: OSI approved open license software is under MIT License

The scripts and repository content require the Julia language ( https://julialang.org/) to run.

Source code available from: https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia

Archived software available from: https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/releases/tag/v1.10.8

License: OSI approved open license software is under MIT License

References

  1. Agostoni C, Risé P, Marangoni F: Membrane composition and cellular responses to fatty acid intakes and factors explaining the variation in response. Nestle Nutr Inst Workshop Ser. 2013;77:111–120. 10.1159/000351393 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ashkar R, Doktorova M, Heberle FA, et al. : Cholesterol affects the bending rigidity of DOPC membranes. Biophys J. 2019;116(3):328a. 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.11.1780 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Casares D, Escribá PV, Rosselló CA: Membrane lipid composition: effect on membrane and organelle structure, function and compartmentalization and therapeutic avenues. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(9):2167. 10.3390/ijms20092167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chakraborty S, Doktorova M, Molugu TR, et al. : How cholesterol stiffens unsaturated lipid membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(36):21896–21905. 10.1073/pnas.2004807117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen Z, Rand RP: The influence of cholesterol on phospholipid membrane curvature and bending elasticity. Biophys J. 1997;73(1):267–276. 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78067-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dimova R: Giant vesicles and their use in assays for assessing membrane phase state, curvature, mechanics, and electrical properties. Annu Rev Biophys. 2019;48:93–119. 10.1146/annurev-biophys-052118-115342 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dimova R: Recent developments in the field of bending rigidity measurements on membranes. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2014;208:225–234. 10.1016/j.cis.2014.03.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Escribá PV, Busquets X, Inokuchi J, et al. : Membrane lipid therapy: modulation of the cell membrane composition and structure as a molecular base for drug discovery and new disease treatment. Prog Lipid Res. 2015;59:38–53. 10.1016/j.plipres.2015.04.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Faizi HA, Frey SL, Steinkühler J, et al. : Bending rigidity of charged lipid bilayer membranes. Soft Matter. 2019;15(29):6006–6013. 10.1039/c9sm00772e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Garenne D, Thompson S, Brisson A, et al. : The all-E. coliTXTL toolbox 3.0: new capabilities of a cell-free synthetic biology platform. Synth Biol (Oxf). 2021;6(1): ysab017. 10.1093/synbio/ysab017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gracià RS, Bezlyepkina N, Knorr RL, et al. : Effect of cholesterol on the rigidity of saturated and unsaturated membranes: fluctuation and electrodeformation analysis of giant vesicles. Soft Matter. 2010a;6(7):1472–1482. 10.1039/B920629A [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gracià RS, Bezlyepkina N, Knorr RL, et al. : Effect of cholesterol on the rigidity of saturated and unsaturated membranes: fluctuation and electrodeformation analysis of giant vesicles. Soft Matter. 2010b;6(7):1472. 10.1039/b920629a [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kahya N, Schwille P: Fluorescence correlation studies of lipid domains in model membranes. Mol Membr Biol. 2006;23(1):29–39. 10.1080/09687860500489099 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Karal MAS, Ahmed M, Levadny V, et al. : Electrostatic interaction effects on the size distribution of self-assembled Giant Unilamellar Vesicles. Phys Rev E. 2020b;101(1–1): 012404. 10.1103/PhysRevE.101.012404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Karal MAS, Ahamed MdK, Mokta NA, et al. : Influence of cholesterol on electroporation in lipid membranes of giant vesicles. Eur Biophys J. 2020a;49(5):361–370. 10.1007/s00249-020-01443-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Karal MAS, Mokta NA, Levadny V, et al. : Effects of cholesterol on the size distribution and bending modulus of lipid vesicles. PLoS One. 2022;17(1): e0263119. 10.1371/journal.pone.0263119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Laurence MJ, Carpenter TS, Laurence TA, et al. : Biophysical characterization of membrane proteins embedded in nanodiscs using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Membranes (Basel). 2022;12(4):392. 10.3390/membranes12040392 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Menger FM, Keiper JS: Chemistry and physics of giant vesicles as biomembrane models. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 1998;2(6):726–732. 10.1016/S1367-5931(98)80110-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nuñez-Magos L, Lira-Escobedo J, Rodríguez-López R, et al. : Effects of DC magnetic fields on magnetoliposomes. Front Mol Biosci. 2021;8: 703417. 10.3389/fmolb.2021.703417 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pan J, Mills TT, Tristram-Nagle S, et al. : Cholesterol perturbs lipid bilayers nonuniversally. Phys Rev Lett. 2008a;100(19): 198103. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.198103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pan J, Tristram-Nagle S, Kucerka N, et al. : Temperature dependence of structure, bending rigidity, and bilayer interactions of dioleoylphosphatidylcholine bilayers. Biophys J. 2008b;94(1):117–124. 10.1529/biophysj.107.115691 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pautot S, Frisken BJ, Weitz DA: Production of unilamellar vesicles using an inverted emulsion. Langmuir. 2003;19:2870–2879. 10.1021/la026100v [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rawicz W, Olbrich KC, McIntosh T, et al. : Effect of chain length and unsaturation on elasticity of lipid bilayers. Biophys J. 2000;79(1):328–339. 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76295-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Roberti E, Petrocelli EL, Cecchi D, et al. : Dimensions, stability, and deformability of DOPC-cholesterol Giant Unilamellar Vesicles formed by droplet transfer - underlying data.2024a. 10.5281/zenodo.14267072 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Roberti E, Petrocelli EL, Cecchi D, et al. : Dimensions, stability and deformability of DOPC-cholesterol Giant Unilamellar Vesicles formed by droplet transfer – extended data.2024b. 10.5281/zenodo.14268213 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Robinson AO, Venero OM, Adamala KP: Toward synthetic life: biomimetic synthetic cell communication. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2021;64:165–173. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2021.08.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sato Y, Hiratsuka Y, Kawamata I, et al. : Micrometer-sized molecular robot changes its shape in response to signal molecules. Sci Robot. 2017;2(4): eaal3735. 10.1126/scirobotics.aal3735 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Shimane Y, Kuruma Y: Rapid and facile preparation of giant vesicles by the droplet transfer method for artificial cell construction. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10: 873854. 10.3389/fbioe.2022.873854 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sorre B, Callan-Jones A, Manneville JB, et al. : Curvature-driven lipid sorting needs proximity to a demixing point and is aided by proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(14):5622–5626. 10.1073/pnas.0811243106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Toparlak OD, Mansy SS: Progress in synthesizing protocells. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2019;244(4):304–313. 10.1177/1535370218816657 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Van de Cauter L, van Buren L, Koenderink GH, et al. : Exploring Giant Unilamellar Vesicle production for artificial cells — current challenges and future directions. Small Methods. 2023;7(12): 2300416. 10.1002/smtd.202300416 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Vutukuri HR, Hoore M, Abaurrea-Velasco C, et al. : Active particles induce large shape deformations in giant lipid vesicles. Nature. 2020;586(7827):52–56. 10.1038/s41586-020-2730-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Woodman S, Kim K: Membrane lipids: implication for diseases and membrane trafficking. n.d.
  34. Wubshet NH, Liu AP: Methods to mechanically perturb and characterize GUV-based minimal cell models. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2023;21:550–562. 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.12.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Yang ST, Kreutzberger AJB, Lee J, et al. : The role of cholesterol in membrane fusion. Chem Phys Lipids. 2016;199:136–143. 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2016.05.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhang J, Li Q, Wu Y, et al. : Cholesterol content in cell membrane maintains surface levels of ErbB2 and confers a therapeutic vulnerability in ErbB2-positive breast cancer. Cell Commun Signal. 2019;17(1): 15. 10.1186/s12964-019-0328-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Open Res Eur. 2025 Jul 23. doi: 10.21956/openreseurope.20721.r56204

Reviewer response for version 1

David W Everett 1

Dimensions, stability, and deformability of DOPC-cholesterol giant unilamellar vesicles formed by droplet transfer

Submitted to Open Research Europe

This manuscript reports on the effect of cholesterol on the membrane of giant unilamellar vesicles, an important topic for understanding digestibility of lipid structures in addition to the biological applications mentioned by the authors. Vesicle size, stability and deformability were measured at different ratios of DOPC to cholesterol using the droplet transfer method for constructing the vesicles. There was some recent work published on this topic that the authors may want to consider Zheng, H., Jiménez-Flores, R. & Everett, D.W. (2025). The impact of sphingomyelin and cholesterol on ordered lipid domain formation in the bovine milk fat globule membrane using artificial giant unilamellar vesicles as a model. JDS Communications, 6, 485-489, which may have some relevance to this current study. The introduction is well-written with a brief overview of why deformability is important in areas such as artificial cells and microrobotics. The impact of cholesterol is not yet fully understood, and this manuscript is a helpful addition to the scientific literature, although the conclusions are rather speculative based on the evidence found.

Specific comments

The methods are appropriate and comprehensively described.

The number of particles measured is in the hundreds for each measurement. Add a space between "279,190" as this may be construed as a much larger number rather than two numbers. Other methods, such as dynamic light scattering, measure very large numbers of particles and thus may be more representative of the population.

Results

Were the increases in diameter (at time zero) at an increasing ratio of DOPC to cholesterol (Fig. 3C) statistically significant? There is no indication of this is the figure or in Table 1, although it is reported in the text as an overall p-value, not individual pairwise comparisons.

For the 60:40 ratio, both vesicle numbers and size decrease overnight. Why is this? There appears to be missing membrane material that is not accounted for. The total GUV surface area should not change overnight if the surface structure remains the same. What accounts for the change in surface area? Could this be a result of measuring a relatively low number of particles that are not representative of the whole sample?

Table 1: include a footnote to explain the last column heading.

Figure 4: Did the total surface area include membrane from vesicles that are touching other vesicles? This would seem to be important, and may alter the conclusion drawn at the end of the results section. Did the ellipsoidal vesicle size change, compared to the spherical data presented in Table 1?

Discussion

"Fusion" (also known as coalescence) is mentioned, but this is not the same as aggregation where two touching particles have separate membranes bound together. Which was occurring in this study? If it was fusion, there must be some unadsorbed DOPC and cholesterol present in the system.

"Interestingly, GUVs remained stable and did not break under the magnetic field". This would preclude fusion from occurring.

The discussion should consider the following paper in terms of the effect of cholesterol on deformability. This was not cited. Costello, A.L. & Alam, T.M. (2010). Investigating the impact of cholesterol on magnetically aligned sphingomyelin/cholesterol multilamellar vesicles using static 31P NMR. Chemistry and Physics of Lipids, 163, 506-513.

Is the study design appropriate and does the work have academic merit?

Yes

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Lipid vesicle structures

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

Open Res Eur. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.21956/openreseurope.20721.r55563

Reviewer response for version 1

Josep Julve 1

Technical issues:

1- Methodology: no statistical analysis subsection has been considered in the methodology. why? How many independent replicates were done?

2- How many independent replicates were done in each pack of experiments (grouped in figures/tables); for instance, in figures 2 and 3, the authors showed representative images and collected size data but did not mention how many independent experiments were done. The authors did not mentione how was the reproducibility in this case. 

2-Why the assesment of physical characteristics of GUVs was not carried out under room or physiological temperatures o/n? May the temperature influence the indicated physical characteristics of GUVs? Possibly, this could be at least considered as one of the main limitations of this study. Please discuss

3- May the authors consider the possibility to use alternative tools to detemine sucha as flow cytometry to assess number and size dstribution of newly-generated GUVs?

4- Were the ratios between cholesterol and POPC moietis within the range of physiological? 

5- A schematic flux diagram (new figure) could be suitable to visualize the technical protocol to obtain GUVs.

6- Methodology, suggestion: trypan blue dye is commonly used in cell cultures to assess cell viability; however, this dye is also a suitable fluorochrome for staining and visualize GUs under confocal microscopy allows high resolution and contrast, and enables the creation of sharp, high-resolution images and 3D reconstructions, that would enrich the analysis of the geometry of generated GUVs.

7- In light of previous studies, the authors used the double unsaturated DOPC as a representative phospholipid to study the impact of increasingly higher concentration cholesterol on membrane characteristics; it is not discussed the whether other phospholipids may behave similarly in the formation of GUVs and to study the influence on GUVs across cholesterol concentration.

Is the study design appropriate and does the work have academic merit?

Partly

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

No

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

No

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

lipid metabolism

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

Open Res Eur. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.21956/openreseurope.20721.r56207

Reviewer response for version 1

Martín E Villanueva 1

In the present paper, the authors have investigated the influence of cholesterol on the properties of Giant Unilamellar Vesicles (GUVs) prepared via the droplet transfer method using varying DOPC:cholesterol ratios. They systematically examined how cholesterol content affects GUV size distribution, temporal stability, and deformability. The study combines phase-contrast microscopy, magnetic deformation assays using ferrofluid-loaded vesicles, and quantitative image analysis to assess these physical characteristics. The results show that increasing cholesterol content leads to larger median diameters and broader size distributions, while stability over time seems affected in a composition-dependent manner. The authors conclude that cholesterol does not significantly affect vesicle deformability under magnetic stress and propose that adjusting the lipid composition in the oil phase offers a simple yet effective strategy to tune GUV properties.

While the proposed approach has certain potential, I have a few concerns on how the results are displayed and interpreted. I will go through them point by point:

  1. The bar plot indicating number of vesicles at t 0 and overnight in Figure 3 indicates that the lowest number of vesicles is presented at t 0 by the 85:15 DOPC:Cho mixture. However, if one follows the corresponding part of the text in the Results section, it is understood that the 71:29 mixture displays the lowest amount of vesicles. One of them should be corrected.

  2. Concluding that cholesterol has no clear influence on membrane rigidity is somewhat problematic, even if this appears to be the case for the specific system studied. As the authors are aware, cholesterol is well known to rigidify lipid bilayers, a phenomenon extensively documented in the literature. In fact, one of the cited references (Karal et al. 2022) clearly highlights how the bending modulus varies with different PC/cholesterol mixtures, both in bilayers and in GUVs, using various experimental techniques. Given this, the authors should discuss in greater detail the possible sources of the observed lack of difference in mechanical response. Could it be that the method used primarily probes area strain or surface deformation, which relates more closely to the area compressibility modulus (Ka)? In DOPC/cholesterol systems, cholesterol has a stronger effect on bending rigidity (κ) than on Ka. If the magnetic field primarily induces shape deformation rather than surface compression, this may explain the absence of a significant cholesterol effect. Additionally, if the GUV population varies in size, membrane pre-tension, or exact composition, such heterogeneity could obscure subtle mechanical differences due to cholesterol.

  3. On the other hand, assuming that the method reliably supports the conclusion that incorporating up to 40 mol% cholesterol does not alter the mechanical properties of the GUVs, the authors provide little clarification on how the preparation protocol itself might influence these mechanical outcomes. This aspect is particularly relevant, as the method of GUV formation can significantly affect membrane structure and properties. Unlike electroformation, the droplet transfer method relies on monolayer-to-bilayer assembly, an interfacially driven process that may lead to different molecular arrangements. It is therefore plausible that this technique results in asymmetric membranes, even for relatively simple DOPC/cholesterol mixtures. As reported by Feigenson et al. (2022, BBA Acta), such asymmetry can promote the formation of induced ordered domains as a means to minimize midplane free energy. These structural differences could, in turn, impact measurements of bending rigidity and may help explain the absence of significant mechanical changes observed in the study.

Is the study design appropriate and does the work have academic merit?

Yes

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Membrane biophysics, Biomembrane models, Physical Chemistry, Nanotechnology.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

Open Res Eur. 2025 Apr 12. doi: 10.21956/openreseurope.20721.r52406

Reviewer response for version 1

Nikoleta Ivanova 1

The main goal of the presented study was to research the stabilizing effect of cholesterol at different concentrations in bilayers composed of unsaturated lipid.

The introduction includes information about lipid bilayers and their involvement in cell membranes. The functions of cholesterol and the effect of the presence of unsaturated lipids such as DOPC in lipid bilayers are discussed. The size and stability of Giant Unilamellar Vesicles (GUVs) were monitored with Phase-contrast microscopy, while the deformation was examined under magnetic field conditions.

The main focus of my review is on the results and conclusions obtained in my scientific field of work related to MD simulations. The proposed work for review is well structured with clearly stated conclusions, but the studied effect is not fully confirmed by the applied method. MD simulations have reported the saturation (lack of changes) of some bilayer parameters at cholesterol content above 30%. It is noteworthy that the authors did not comment on the phase state of lipids at the relatively low temperature 4°C. This may also be the reason for the observed weak dependence of stability on cholesterol concentration.

Suggested comments could be added to the Discussion and conclusions section.

Is the study design appropriate and does the work have academic merit?

Partly

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Physical Chemistry, Computational Chemistry

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Availability Statement

    Underlying data

    Zenodo: Dimensions, stability and deformability of DOPC-cholesterol Giant Unilamellar Vesicles formed by droplet transfer https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14267071( Roberti et al., 2024a)

    This dataset contains the following underlying data:

    • “Manifest.toml” Julia computational environment file

    • “Project.toml” Julia computational environment file

    • “_init.jl” script initialising the Julia computational environment based on the “Manifest.toml” and “Project.toml” files

    • “deformability.jl” script to analyse the magnetic deformation of ferrofluid-loaded GUVs with and without cholesterol

    • “size_distribution_stability.jl” script to analyse the size distribution and overnight stability of GUVs with different DOPC:Chol ratios

    • “data” folder containing the datasets with the sizes of all the observed GUVs

      • GUVs_stability_ON

      • GUVs_stability_T0

      • GUVs_with_cholesterol_6040_1

      • GUVs_with_cholesterol_6040_2

      • GUVs_with_cholesterol_6040_3

      • GUVs_without_cholesterol_1

      • GUVs_without_cholesterol_2

      • GUVs_without_cholesterol_3

    • “utilities” folder containing the script to calculate the magnetic field generated by our permanent magnets device

      • “magnetic_fields.jl”

    Extended data

    Zenodo: Dimensions, stability and deformability of DOPC-cholesterol Giant Unilamellar Vesicles formed by droplet transfer https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14268212( Roberti et al., 2024b)

    This dataset contains the following extended data:

    • “deformation_size” folder containing scatter plots of σ with respect to GUVs rest radii

      • sd_deform_scatter_H1

      • sd_deform_scatter_H2

      • sd_deform_scatter_H3

    • “magnetic_device_support” folder containing the .stl files for 3D-printing the magnets-support of the magnetic device

      • magnetic_device_support_part1

      • magnetic_device_support_part2

    • “size_distribution_magnetic” folder containing size distribution histograms comparing 100:0 DOPC:cholesterol and 60:40 DOPC:cholesterol samples, under the application of magnetic fields

      • sd_magnetic_size_dist_allfields

      • sd_magnetic_size_dist_H1

      • sd_magnetic_size_dist_H2

      • sd_magnetic_size_dist_H3

    • “size_distribution_T0vsON” folder containing size distribution histograms comparing pristine samples (t 0) and samples after overnight storage (ON), for different DOPC:cholesterol ratios

      • sd_size_dist_60_40

      • sd_size_dist_71_29

      • sd_size_dist_85_15

      • sd_size_dist_100_0


    Articles from Open Research Europe are provided here courtesy of European Commission, Directorate General for Research and Innovation

    RESOURCES