Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Anatomy logoLink to Journal of Anatomy
. 1981 Jun;132(Pt 4):545–555.

Antenatal anticipation of postnatal muscle function.

M N Sivachelvan, A S Davies
PMCID: PMC1233321  PMID: 6457822

Abstract

The semitendinosus muscle of the sheep was used as an experimental model to test antenatal anticipation of muscle postnatal function using the alkali-stabile myosin ATPase technique. Areas of variable fibre type population density were seen from 80 days of gestation. The highest population density of ATPase-low fibres was observed in the craniomedial aspect of the muscle (the ATPase-low dense area). The lowest ATPase-low fibre population density area (the ATPase-low sparse area) was seen in the caudolateral aspect of the muscle. Simultaneous electromyographic studies indicated that the ATPase-low dense area is preferentially used for posture and during quiet co-ordinated activity, while the ATPase-low sparse area is recruited only intermittently when the hip and stifle are less co-ordinated in movement. The ATPase-low fibre percentage within the ATPase-low dense area of the muscle increased from 10 to 30% from 80 days of gestation to adulthood. The part of this change occurring antenatally is expected to be the result of genetic anticipation.

Full text

PDF
545

Images in this article

548Fig. 2
on p.548
552Fig. 5
on p.552

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ashmore C. R., Addis P. B., Doerr L. Development of muscle fibers in the fetal pig. J Anim Sci. 1973 Jun;36(6):1088–1093. doi: 10.2527/jas1973.3661088x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ashmore C. R., Robinson D. W., Rattray P., Doerr L. Biphasic development of muscle fibers in the fetal lamb. Exp Neurol. 1972 Nov;37(2):241–255. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(72)90071-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barcroft J., Barron D. H., Windle W. F. Some observations on genesis of somatic movements in sheep embryos. J Physiol. 1936 Jun 10;87(1):73–78. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1936.sp003390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Beermann D. H., Cassens R. G., Hausman G. J. A second look at fiber type differentiation in porcine skeletal muscle. J Anim Sci. 1978 Jan;46(1):125–132. doi: 10.2527/jas1978.461125x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bryden M. M. Growth patterns of individual muscles of the elephant seal, Mirounga leonina (L.). J Anat. 1973 Oct;116(Pt 1):121–133. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bryden M. M. Regulation of relative growth by functional demand: its importance in animal production. Growth. 1969 Jun;33(2):143–156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Burke R. E., Levine D. N., Tsairis P., Zajac F. E., 3rd Physiological types and histochemical profiles in motor units of the cat gastrocnemius. J Physiol. 1973 Nov;234(3):723–748. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bárány M. ATPase activity of myosin correlated with speed of muscle shortening. J Gen Physiol. 1967 Jul;50(6 Suppl):197–218. doi: 10.1085/jgp.50.6.197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bárány M., Close R. I. The transformation of myosin in cross-innervated rat muscles. J Physiol. 1971 Mar;213(2):455–474. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Davies A. S., Gunn H. M. Histochemical fibre types in the mammalian diaphragm. J Anat. 1972 May;112(Pt 1):41–60. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Davies A. S. Postnatal changes in the histochemical fibre types of procine skeletal muscle. J Anat. 1972 Nov;113(Pt 2):213–240. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dubowitz V. Enzyme histochemistry of skeletal muscle. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1965 Dec;28(6):516–524. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.28.6.516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gollnick P. D., Karlsson J., Piehl K., Saltin B. Selective glycogen depletion in skeletal muscle fibres of man following sustained contractions. J Physiol. 1974 Aug;241(1):59–67. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gunn H. M. Differences in the histochemical properties of skeletal muscles of different breeds of horses and dogs. J Anat. 1978 Dec;127(Pt 3):615–634. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Guth L., Samaha F. J. Qualitative differences between actomyosin ATPase of slow and fast mammalian muscle. Exp Neurol. 1969 Sep;25(1):138–152. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(69)90077-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Herring S. W., Grimm A. F., Grimm B. R. Functional heterogeneity in a multipinnate muscle. Am J Anat. 1979 Apr;154(4):563–576. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001540410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Holmes J. H., Ashmore C. R. A histochemical study of development of muscle fiber type and size in normal and "double muscled" cattle. Growth. 1972 Dec;36(4):351–372. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Karpati G., Engel W. K. Neuronal trophic function. A new aspect demonstrated histochemically in developing soleus muscle. Arch Neurol. 1967 Nov;17(5):542–545. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1967.00470290096012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kugelberg E. Adaptive transformation of rat soleus motor units during growth. J Neurol Sci. 1976 Mar;27(3):269–289. doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(76)90001-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nyström B. Histochemistry of developing cat muscles. Acta Neurol Scand. 1968;44(4):405–439. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1968.tb05584.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. PADYKULA H. A., HERMAN E. The specificity of the histochemical method for adenosine triphosphatase. J Histochem Cytochem. 1955 May;3(3):170–195. doi: 10.1177/3.3.170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Smith J. L., Edgerton V. R., Betts B., Collatos T. C. EMG of slow and fast ankle extensors of cat during posture, locomotion, and jumping. J Neurophysiol. 1977 May;40(3):503–513. doi: 10.1152/jn.1977.40.3.503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sullivan T. E., Armstrong R. B. Rat locomotory muscle fiber activity during trotting and galloping. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1978 Mar;44(3):358–363. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1978.44.3.358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Swatland H. J. Transitional stages in the histochemical development of muscle fibres during post-natal growth. Histochem J. 1977 Nov;9(6):751–757. doi: 10.1007/BF01003069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Walmsley B., Hodgson J. A., Burke R. E. Forces produced by medial gastrocnemius and soleus muscles during locomotion in freely moving cats. J Neurophysiol. 1978 Sep;41(5):1203–1216. doi: 10.1152/jn.1978.41.5.1203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wentink G. H. Biokinetical analysis of the movements of the pelvic limb of the horse and the role of the muscles in the walk and the trot. Anat Embryol (Berl) 1978 Feb 20;152(3):261–272. doi: 10.1007/BF00350524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wentink G. H. The action of the hind limb musculature of the dog in walking. Acta Anat (Basel) 1976;96(1):70–80. doi: 10.1159/000144662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Anatomy are provided here courtesy of Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland

RESOURCES