Skip to main content
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2025 Aug 9;16:7353. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-62810-x

Changes in susceptibility of Plasmodium falciparum to antimalarial drugs in Uganda over time: 2019–2024

Martin Okitwi 1,#, Stephen Orena 1,#, Patrick K Tumwebaze 1, Thomas Katairo 1, Yoweri Taremwa 1, Oswald Byaruhanga 1, Stephen Tukwasibwe 1, Samuel L Nsobya 1, Jennifer Legac 2, Jeffrey A Bailey 3, Roland A Cooper 4, Melissa D Conrad 2,, Philip J Rosenthal 2,
PMCID: PMC12335539  PMID: 40783405

Abstract

The treatment and control of malaria in Africa is challenged by drug resistance. We characterized ex vivo susceptibilities to nine drugs of isolates collected from individuals presenting with uncomplicated falciparum malaria in eastern (2019-2024) and northern (2021-2024) Uganda and performed deep sequencing, with analysis of 80 Plasmodium falciparum genes, to evaluate associations between susceptibilities and potential resistance markers for samples studied since 2016. For 1114 evaluated isolates, median half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50s) were low-nanomolar for chloroquine, monodesethylamodiaquine, piperaquine, pyronaridine, lumefantrine, mefloquine, and DHA, but higher for quinine and pyrimethamine. Over time, susceptibilities improved for chloroquine, decreased for lumefantrine, mefloquine, and DHA, and were unchanged for other drugs. Changes in prevalences of known markers of altered drug susceptibility followed the same patterns. Genotypes associated with drug susceptibility were those previously identified for aminoquinolines and pyrimethamine. For lumefantrine, susceptibility was decreased with wild-type PfCRT K76T or PfMDR1 N86Y, mutant PfK13 C469Y or A675V, mutant PfCARL D611N, and other polymorphisms. For DHA, susceptibility was decreased with the PfK13 C469Y or A675V and PfMDR1 Y500N mutations. Decreasing activities of lumefantrine and DHA suggest potential loss of efficacies of leading regimens, although the clinical consequences of these changes are, to date, uncertain.

Subject terms: Epidemiology, Parasite genomics, Malaria


In this study, the authors present antimalarial drug resistance surveillance data from Uganda over the period 2019-2024. They measure ex vivo susceptibility to nine standard antimalarials in 1,114 isolates and characterise sequences of markers of drug susceptibility.

Introduction

After good progress early this century, the control of malaria in Africa, the region responsible for ~95% of malaria morbidity and mortality, has stalled1. A challenge to malaria control and eventual elimination is increasing resistance of malaria parasites, in particular Plasmodium falciparum, to available drugs2. Of particular concern is potential resistance to artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs), including artemether-lumefantrine and artesunate-amodiaquine, the most widely used therapies for uncomplicated malaria in Africa, and the alternative ACTs dihydroartemisinin (DHA)-piperaquine, artesunate-pyronaridine, and artesunate-mefloquine3. In addition, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) has an important role in malaria control, including intermittent preventive therapy in pregnant women, perennial malaria chemoprevention in infants, and, in combination with amodiaquine, seasonal malaria chemoprevention in children4. Increasing resistance to artemisinins, ACT partner drugs, and SP threatens effective treatment and prevention of malaria across Africa.

Three categories of antimalarial drug resistance are highly relevant for Africa5,6. First, resistance to chloroquine and amodiaquine is mediated principally by the PfCRT K76T and PfMDR1 N86Y mutations, which alter drug transport7. The prevalence of these mutations was previously high across Africa, but it has decreased greatly in many areas5. An opposite effect is seen with lumefantrine and mefloquine, with the PfCRT K76T and PfMDR1 N86Y wild-type alleles and pfmdr1 amplification associated with decreased susceptibility8. Different mutations in PfCRT and amplification of plasmepsin genes have been associated with resistance to piperaquine, a related aminoquinoline, but to date only in southeast Asia6 and South America9. Second, partial resistance to artemisinins (ART-R) became well established in the Greater Mekong Subregion of southeast Asia early this century10. ART-R manifests as delayed parasite clearance after therapy with artemisinins and enhanced parasite survival after in vitro exposure to DHA, and is mediated principally by any of ~20 mutations (with generally only one of these mutations in an individual strain) in the P. falciparum kelch (PfK13) protein propeller domain11. Multiple PfK13 mutations previously validated as mediators of ART-R have emerged in Africa, including R561H in Rwanda12,13, western Tanzania14, and southwestern Uganda15; C469Y and A675V in northern Uganda15,16; and R622I in Eritrea and Ethiopia17,18. However, these mutations have not been clearly linked to decreased clinical efficacy of ACTs in Africa, and associations between PfK13 mutations and resistance phenotypes do not appear to be as straightforward in Africa as in Southeast Asia11. Third, resistance to SP, mediated principally by mutations in the target enzymes dihydrofolate reductase (PfDHFR N51I, C59R, S108N) and dihydropteroate synthase (PfDHPS A437G, K540E), is common in much of Africa, with two additional mutations, PfDHFR I164L and PfDHPS A581G, which mediate high-level SP resistance19, spreading across parts of east Africa5,20,21.

In Uganda, serial surveillance has shown loss of the PfCRT and PfMDR1 mutations that mediate resistance to chloroquine and amodiaquine, emergence of five validated or candidate PfK13 ART-R mutations in different parts of the country, and increasing prevalence of the PfDHFR I164L and PfDHPS A581G SP-resistance mutations15,21. Prior ex vivo studies in Tororo, in eastern Uganda, showed generally good activities of studied antimalarials, except for the PfDHFR inhibitor pyrimethamine22,23. However, modest decreases in susceptibility to DHA and lumefantrine, which may challenge the efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine, the first-line malaria therapy, were recently seen in isolates from northern Uganda24. Most clinical trials have shown excellent efficacies of leading ACTs in Africa,5,25,26 but there have been exceptions (at sites without known ART-R at the times of the studies) with artemether-lumefantrine genotype-corrected treatment efficacies <90%27, including a recent trial in Uganda28, although genotyping to assign outcomes is challenging in such high transmission regions.

Considering the dynamic nature of antimalarial drug sensitivity in Africa, it is important to maintain surveillance for emerging drug resistance. For this reason, we have regularly assessed ex vivo drug susceptibilities and genotypes of P. falciparum causing malaria in eastern Uganda since 2010 and in northern Uganda since 2021. We report here the results of surveillance conducted over the last five years and associations between drug susceptibility phenotypes and parasite genotypes.

Results

Study samples and participants

Of 1297 P. falciparum isolates collected since July, 2019, 724/828 assessed in Tororo, in eastern Uganda, and 390/469 assessed in Kalongo, in northern Uganda, were successfully evaluated for ex vivo drug susceptibilities (Fig. 1). Baseline characteristics of participants were similar over time, although parasitemias were lower and participant ages higher in northern Uganda (Table 1).

Fig. 1. Study sites.

Fig. 1

Samples were collected at the indicated health facilities and at clinics adjacent to the two indicated laboratories.

Table 1.

Characteristics of study participants and samples studied by ex vivo analysis

All sites Eastern Uganda Northern Uganda
Year Samples studied Parasitemia(median, %, (IQR)) Male (%) Age (mean, y (SD)) <5 y age (%) Samples studied Parasitemia (median, %, (IQR)) Male (%) Age (mean, y (SD)) <5 y age (%) Samples studied Parasitemia(median, %, (IQR)) Male (%) Age (mean, y (SD)) <5 y age (%)
2019 76 3.4 (2.0–5.6) 34.2 5.4 (4.9) 54.0 76 3.4 (2.0–5.6) 34.2 5.4 (4.9) 54.0 0 - - - -
2020 97 4.0 (2.5–6.1) 39.6 5.2 (4.3) 60.4 97 4.0 (2.5–6.1) 39.6 5.2 (4.3) 60.4 0 - - - -
2021 210 2.4 (1.2–4.2) 40.5 7.6 (6.7) 42.4 154 3.1 (1.8–4.9) 41.6 6.2 (5.2) 48.1 56 1.0 (0.5–1.6) 37.5 11.3 (8.7) 26.8
2022 262 1.8 (0.9–3.3) 45.4 8.3 (7.1) 36.9 162 2.4 (1.6–4.0) 48.2 5.8(4.5) 50.7 100 0.9 (0.5–1.7) 41.0 12.0 (8.7) 16.0
2023 313 1.7 (0.9–3.3) 40.9 7.5 (6.8) 42.2 171 2.5 (1.2–4.5) 46.4 6.0 (7.1) 57.8 142 1.0 (0.5–1.8) 34.5 9.2 (6.1) 23.9
2024 155 1.5 (0.7–2.9) 50.3 7.2 (7.7) 48.1 64 2.1 (1.5–3.3) 48.4 6.3 (5.7) 57.1 91 0.9 (0.43–2.0) 51.7 7.8 (8.9) 41.8
Total 1113 2.0 (1.0–3.9) 42.6 7.3 (6.8) 44.3 724 2.7 (1.6–4.9) 43.7 5.9 (5.5) 54.0 389 1.0 (0.5–1.8) 40.6 9.9 (8.0) 26.5

Ex vivo drug susceptibilities

We measured ex vivo susceptibilities of all isolates to nine standard antimalarials. For successful assays, the mean Z factor was 0.75 (SD ± 0.26), indicating robust assays. Median IC50 values were at low nanomolar levels for chloroquine (12.6 nM), MDAQ (7.8 nM), piperaquine (5.4 nM), DHA (2.9 nM), lumefantrine (11.3), mefloquine (15.2 nM), and pyronaridine (1.5 nM), consistent with potent activity, and higher for quinine (115 nM), which is typically less potent than the other studied compounds, and pyrimethamine (35,100 nM), against which resistance is well-established (Table 2; Fig. 2). From 2016 to 2024, marked decreases in susceptibilities (Mann-Kendall Tau ≥±0.2) were seen for DHA, lumefantrine, and mefloquine (Supplementary Table 1). The more marked changes in susceptibilities occurred in eastern Uganda, likely with decreases in susceptibilities to key drugs in northern Uganda before initiation of studies in that region, as suggested by our earlier comparison of the sites (Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2)24. Susceptibilities of Dd2 and 3D7 laboratory reference strains yielded IC50 values similar to those reported previously (Supplementary Table 2). Comparing median values for five drugs studied in both 2010–201322 and the current study, susceptibilities increased for chloroquine (IC50 248 to 12.6 nM), MDAQ (76.9 to 7.8 nM), and piperaquine (19.1 to 5.4 nM) and decreased for DHA (1.4 to 2.9 nM) and lumefantrine (3.0 to 11.3 nM; p < 0.001 for all comparisons).

Table 2.

Summary of drug susceptibility data (2019–2024)

IC50 (nM)
Drug All sites Eastern Uganda Northern Uganda
N Median IQR N Median IQR N Median IQR
Chloroquine 1060 12.6 9.2–18.0 707 13.2 9.7–19.0 353 11.3 8.7–16.4
MDAQ 1062 7.8 4.9–10.4 708 7.6 4.8–10.1 354 8.2 5.2–10.8
Piperaquine 1062 5.4 3.6–8.2 708 5.5 3.6–8.3 354 5.2 3.5–7.8
DHA 1063 2.9 1.6–4.5 710 2.5 1.5–4.1 353 3.4 2.2–5.0
Lumefantrine 1060 11.3 6.1–19.5 706 8.7 5.2–17.2 354 15.3 10.4–21.7
Mefloquine 1058 15.2 9.6–24.8 709 14.9 9.4–25.2 349 15.8 9.9–23.2
Pyronaridine 1057 1.5 0.7–2.7 704 1.5 0.8–2.8 353 1.4 0.6–2.7
Quinine 770 115 75.1–173 625 117 76.8–178 145 106 72.1–153
Pyrimethamine 881 35,100 24,900–49,100 674 38,100 27,100–52,000 207 28,100 19,900–37,400

Fig. 2. Ex vivo drug susceptibilities in Uganda over time.

Fig. 2

Paired plots present the distribution of susceptibilities for assayed isolates (left; median values shown) and results over time (right; median values shown for each year). Each dot represents an isolate; n for each drug and each year is provided in Supplementary Table 9. There were no technical replicates. Boxes show the first to third quartiles, and whiskers extend to the largest values no more than 1.5X the inter-quartile ranges. X-axis tick marks indicate June 1 of each year. The curves were generated using loess smoothing implemented by geom_smooth; the grey bands represent the 95% confidence intervals. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

RSAs were performed on a subset of isolates, including 126 from eastern and 314 from northern Uganda. Consistent with other recent results from Uganda24, but in contrast to results from before 2020 in Uganda23,29 and from southeast Asia30, many isolates had survival above previously-established ART-R cut-offs (Fig. 2). Overall, 78.2% of isolates had 72 h survival >1%, and 35.8% survival >5% of control values. RSA survival increased over time, but with the significance criterion of Mann-Kendall Tau ≥±0.2 the increase was significant only in eastern Uganda.

Genotypes

Of the 1114 isolates with ex vivo results, we characterised sequences of 1070 for known markers of altered drug susceptibility. Prevalences of the PfCRT K76T and PfMDR1 N86Y mutations, which are associated with resistance to chloroquine and amodiaquine7, have been decreasing21, and were very low in recent years in our studied isolates (Fig. 3; Supplementary Table 3). Prevalences of two other common PfMDR1 mutations were similar to those reported previously21, with stable prevalence of the Y184F mutation, which has generally not been associated with drug susceptibility, but may impact on parasite fitness31, and low and decreasing prevalence of the D1246Y mutation. Mutations associated with aminoquinoline resistance in Southeast Asia (PfCRT H97Y, F145I, M343L, G353V32) or South America (PfCRT C350R9) were not detected in any isolates. Definitive increased copy number of pfmdr133 or plasmepsin 2/39,34, which has been associated with decreased susceptibility to lumefantrine and mefloquine or piperaquine, respectively, was not observed, with the vast majority of copy numbers measured at ≤1.5, and copy number of 1.6 seen for 1/661 isolates for pfmdr1 and 4/445 isolates for plasmepsin 2 (Supplementary Table 4). Prevalences of five mutations associated with resistance to SP (PfDHFR N51I, C59R, S108N; PfDHPS A437G, K540E) were very high, as has been the case in Uganda for at least two decades35, and two additional mutations associated with higher level resistance (PfDHFR I164L, PfDHPS A581G19), and seen in recent years at increasing prevalence in western Uganda21, had modest prevalence in both eastern and northern Uganda (Fig. 3; Supplementary Table 3). The PfK13 C469Y and A675V mutations were first identified in southeast Asia and more recently validated as markers of ART-R in northern Uganda11,16,24. These mutations were at moderate prevalence in northern Uganda at the time of our first collections in 2021 (prevalence 30.5% for C469Y and 8.5% for A675V), with stable prevalence since that time. In eastern Uganda, the mutations were at very low prevalence until 2021, with increasing prevalence since that time. Other PfK13 validated or candidate ART-R mutations that have been seen elsewhere in eastern Africa (P441L, C469F, R561H, R622I) were not seen.

Fig. 3. Prevalence of genetic polymorphisms associated with altered drug susceptibility over time at sites in eastern and northern Uganda.

Fig. 3

WT wild type. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Genotype-phenotype associations

We searched for associations between genotypes identified by sequencing of 80 candidate genes and drug susceptibility phenotypes, considering available data from 2016 to 2024, including older results published previously24, and we included strict criteria for significant associations. Of greatest interest were results for DHA and lumefantrine. Considering PfK13 mutations previously associated with ART-R, the C469Y and A675V mutations were associated with decreased activity (based on IC50s) for DHA and lumefantrine (Fig. 4, Supplementary Tables 5 and 6). Interestingly, these mutations were not associated with RSA results. As described previously8, the PfMDR1 N86Y wild-type allele was associated with decreased susceptibility to lumefantrine and mefloquine and the PfCRT K76T wild-type allele with decreased susceptibility to lumefantrine, although analyses were limited by low prevalence of mutant genotypes. Multiple other polymorphisms were associated with susceptibilities to DHA and lumefantrine (Supplementary Tables 5 and 6). Strong associations included, for lumefantrine, PfCARL D611N (IC50 7.5 nM for wild type, 20.2 nM for mixed, and 44.3 nM for mutant), with increased prevalence over time, and, for DHA, PfMDR1 Y500N (IC50 1.9 nM for wild type, 2.6 nM for mixed, and 5.4 nM for mutant; Fig. 4, Supplementary Tables 5 and 6).

Fig. 4. Associations between genotypes of interest and ex vivo drug susceptibility.

Fig. 4

Drug susceptibility for wild-type (WT), mixed WT/mutant, and pure mutant (Mut) isolates are shown for selected drugs and polymorphisms of interest. There were no technical replicates. Centre bounds of boxes correspond to the medians, and minimal and maximal bounds correspond to 25 and 75th percentiles, respectively. Whiskers extend to extreme values no further than 1.5x the IQR from the 25 or 75th percentiles. Benjamini-Hochberg corrected p-values for two-sided, pairwise-Wilcoxon tests are indicated. Additional associations are shown in Supplementary Tables 5-7. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

To consider the interplay between PfK13 mutations and candidate resistance markers, we assessed shared prevalence. The few PfMDR1 N86Y and PfCRT K76T mutations identified were seen exclusively with PfK13 wild-type sequences. Considering only pure mutant and pure wild-type genotypes to avoid haplotype assumptions, PfCARL D611N was seen with PfK13 wild-type, C469Y mutant, and A675V mutant sequences, while PfMDR1 Y500N was seen with PfK13 wild-type and C469Y mutant sequences. Susceptibilities to lumefantrine were lowest in the presence of PfK13 C469Y and/or A675V mutations with either wild-type or mutant alleles at PfCARL D611N and for DHA were lowest in the presence of the PfK13 C469Y mutation with either wild-type or mutant alleles at PfMDR1 Y500N, although few samples were available for some comparisons (Supplementary Table 7). As with the PfK13 mutations, the PfCARL D611N and PfMDR1 Y500N mutations were not associated with RSA results. The mutations were also associated with decreased susceptibilities in the absence of PfK13 mutations.

For chloroquine and amodiaquine, consistent with earlier results, the PfCRT K76T mutation (Fig. 4, Supplementary Table 8) and other PfCRT mutations that usually form a haplotype, were associated with decreased activity. For pyrimethamine, susceptibilities were poor with the PfDHFR C59R mutation (IC50 37,800 nM) and even poorer with the I164L mutation (86,800 nM; Fig. 4, Supplementary Table 8). No significant associations were seen between studied genotypes and the ex vivo activities of piperaquine, pyronaridine, or quinine, or DHA activity based on the RSA.

Discussion

In the face of changing drug susceptibilities, it is critical that we understand the antimalarial efficacies of key drugs in Africa. We have studied the ex vivo activities of antimalarial drugs against freshly isolated P. falciparum in Uganda since 2010. This report offers data collected over the last five years. Commonly used drugs, including DHA, the active metabolite of all clinically relevant artemisinins, and all widely used ACT partner drugs (except SP, which is little used for treatment in Africa) remained active against P. falciparum in standard assays at low nM concentrations, a reassuring result. However, important changes in susceptibilities were seen. Specifically, susceptibility to chloroquine increased, suceptibilities to most other tested drugs remained stable, but susceptibilities to both DHA and the ACT partner drug lumefantrine decreased over time. Absolute changes in susceptibilities to DHA and lumefantrine were modest, and the clinical consequences of these changes are uncertain. Overall, our results offer reassurance that the activities of widely used antimalarials generally remain good, but also raise concern that the efficacies of leading ACTs may be decreasing.

Coincident with the emergence and spread of PfK13 mutations previously validated as markers of ART-R, susceptibility to DHA has decreased. However, significant decreases and significant correlations between PfK13 mutations and DHA susceptibility were seen only with the standard DHA growth inhibition assay and not with the RSA, which includes a 6 h incubation with DHA to mimic the short clinical exposure to artemisinins, and was a better indicator of ART-R than DHA IC50 measurements in southeast Asia30. Factors contributing to the lack of significant correlation between PfK13 mutations and RSA survival may have included the polyclonal nature of most Ugandan isolates, technical differences between the ex vivo RSA (which does not include parasite synchronisation) and assays with synchronised culture adapted parasites, and our relatively small sample size for RSAs. Of note, enhanced parasite survival in the ex vivo RSA was more common than in studies of Ugandan isolates collected from 2015 to 2020 using the same assay8,29, suggesting loss of DHA activity over time, and that mediators in addition to PfK13 mutations impact parasite clearance.

Lumefantrine, the partner drug for the most widely used ACT, has demonstrated potent activity and a strong barrier to resistance since the initiation of widespread use in Africa about two decades ago. However, lumefantrine susceptibility was lower in isolates collected in 2021 from northern, compared to eastern Uganda, and susceptibility was tightly correlated with prevalence of the PfK13 C469Y and A675V mutations, which at that time had high prevalence in northern, but not eastern Uganda24. Since that time, the prevalence of the C469Y and A675V mutations has increased, and lumefantrine susceptibility has decreased in eastern Uganda15, and prevalence of these mutations was again tightly correlated with lumefantrine susceptibility. Although there is no direct evidence that decreased lumefantrine susceptibility is mediated by PfK13 mutations, it is possible that these PfK13 mutant parasites have acquired additional mutations that influence susceptibility to lumefantrine.

The clinical consequences of the observed changes in P. falciparum susceptibility to artemether-lumefantrine in Uganda remain uncertain. Most recent trials have demonstrated excellent treatment efficacies for artemether-lumefantrine5,11,27. However, studies in Angola36, Burkina Faso37, Democratic Republic of Congo38, Tanzania39, and Uganda28 have shown genotype-corrected treatment efficacies for AL < 90% at certain sites. In all cases, the prevalence of ART-R-mediating PfK13 mutations was very low at the time of these studies, so the sub-optimal treatment efficacy was not due in a straightforward manner to ART-R. Further, these results must be interpreted with caution, as assignment of treatment outcomes using varied molecular genotyping methods is inexact, especially in areas of very high malaria transmission4042. In addition, P. falciparum infections recently acquired in Africa and evaluated elsewhere have demonstrated decreased in vitro activity of lumefantrine, enhanced RSA survival, and multiple failures of therapy with artemether-lumefantrine both with43,44 and without44,45 known ART-R-mediating PfK13 mutations. Taken together, although our understanding of this area remains incomplete, the combination of evidence for decreasing activities of both components of artemether-lumefantrine in Uganda in prior studies23,24 and this report and of sub-optimal clinical efficacy for artemether-lumefantrine in multiple countries is concerning.

We assessed associations between polymorphisms in 80 genes known or suspected to be linked to antimalarial drug resistance and ex vivo drug susceptibility. We confirmed previously identified associations for chloroquine and MDAQ (decreased susceptibility with the PfCRT K76T mutation), lumefantrine and mefloquine (decreased susceptibility with the wild-type PfMDR1 N86Y allele), and pyrimethamine (stepwise decreased susceptibility with the PfDHFR C59R and I164L mutations). These results suggest improved activity of ASAQ, consistent with recent therapeutic efficacy studies, modest decreases in lumefantrine activity, and minimal activity for pyrimethamine as a component of SP.

As shown previously, the PfK13 C469Y and A675V mutations were associated with decreased susceptibility to both DHA and lumefantrine24. Among other studied polymorphisms, multiple associations were seen, and of interest were strong associations for the PfCARL D611N mutation for lumefantrine and the PfMDR1 Y500N mutation for DHA; whether these polymorphisms directly impact drug susceptibility is unknown. The variability in drug susceptibilities for isolates without known drug resistance-mediating mutations suggests that additional genetic polymorphisms impact on susceptibility. Ongoing whole-genome sequencing of select isolates may identify additional potential mediators of altered drug susceptibility.

Our new data offer insights into mediators of drug susceptibility and the consequences of changing P. falciparum genetics in Uganda over time. First, for chloroquine and amodiaquine, drug susceptibility remains strongly correlated with the primary resistance mediator, the PfCRT K76T mutation, but this mutation is now very uncommon in Uganda. Second, susceptibility to DHA and lumefantrine was significantly decreased in parasites with the PfK13 C469Y or A675V mutations, which now have combined prevalences approaching 50% in much of Uganda15. Third, lumefantrine susceptibility was also modestly but significantly decreased in parasites with the wild-type PfMDR1 N86Y sequence, which is now nearly universal in Uganda. Fourth, other polymorphisms associated with susceptibility to DHA and lumefantrine were identified, highlighting additional potential resistance mediators. Fifth, pyrimethamine susceptibility was poor for isolates containing three common PfDHFR mutations and even worse for those that also contained the I164L mutation, suggesting that, consistent with recent studies from Uganda46, the antimalarial protective efficacy of SP will be poor. Taken together, our results indicate a number of polymorphisms with clear impacts on P. falciparum drug susceptibility and evidence that susceptibilities to the components of artemether-lumefantrine have decreased. Thus, continued performance of parasitological and genomic surveillance for evidence of antimalarial drug resistance and institution of policy changes to limit resistance selection and treatment failure are high priorities47.

Methods

Isolates for study

We collected blood from patients diagnosed with uncomplicated malaria between July, 2019 and June, 2024 at three sites in eastern Uganda (Tororo District Hospital, Tororo District; Masafu General Hospital, Busia District; and Busiu Health Centre IV, Mbale District) and assessed drug susceptibilities at our laboratory in Tororo (Fig. 1). We added collection of samples from patients with uncomplicated malaria in Agago District, in northern Uganda, first with transport of samples from Patongo Health Centre IV to our Tororo laboratory from May to July, 2021 and April to July, 2022, and since January, 2023 with samples from Patongo Health Centre IV and Dr. Ambrosoli Memorial Hospital, Kalongo assessed in a new laboratory at the hospital. To increase sample size for genotype-phenotype association studies we extended our analyses to include 1668 samples collected since 2016, including results for 554 samples which were published previously, all from eastern Uganda and collected from June, 2016 to July, 201923. Patients reporting antimalarial treatment within the previous 30 days or infected with non-falciparum species were excluded. Written informed consent was obtained from adults and parents or guardians of children <18 years; children aged 8–17 years provided assent. Venous blood (2–5 ml) was collected in a heparin tube, after which participants were treated with artemether-lumefantrine, following national guidelines. The study was approved by the Makerere University School of Biomedical Sciences Research and Ethics Committee, the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology, and the University of California, San Francisco Committee on Human Research.

Determination of ex vivo drug susceptibilities

Samples containing only P. falciparum and at least 0.2% parasitaemia by Giemsa-stained thin smear were analysed. Samples were centrifuged, buffy coats removed, and erythrocyte pellets washed 3X with wash medium (RPMI 1640 with 25 mM HEPES, 24 mM NaHCO3, 10 μg/mL gentamicin) and resuspended in complete culture medium (RPMI 1640 with 25 mM HEPES, 24 mM NaHCO3, 0.1 mM hypoxanthine, 10 μg/mL gentamicin, and 0.5% AlbuMAX II (Thermo Fisher Scientific)) to produce a haematocrit of 50%, and aliquots were spotted onto filter paper for molecular analysis.

Drug susceptibilities were assessed using a 72 h growth inhibition assay with SYBR Green detection23. Briefly, study compounds (chloroquine, monodesethylamodiaquine (MDAQ, the active metabolite of amodiaquine), piperaquine, pyronaridine, mefloquine, lumefantrine, DHA, quinine, and pyrimethamine), supplied by Medicines for Malaria Venture, were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (water for chloroquine) as 10 mM stocks (50 mM for pyrimethamine) stored at −20 °C, and three-fold serial dilutions in complete medium were placed in 96-well microplates (50 μL per well), including drug-free and parasite-free controls. Cultures were diluted with uninfected erythrocytes to 200 μL per well at 0.2% parasitaemia and 2% haematocrit. Plates were maintained at 5% CO2, 5% O2, and 90% N2 for 72 h at 37 °C in a humidified modular incubator. After 72 h, 100 μL resuspended culture per well was transferred to black 96-well plates containing 100 μL SYBR Green lysis buffer (20 mM Tris, 5 mM EDTA, 0.008% saponin, 0.08% Triton X-100, and 0.2 μL/mL SYBR Green I) per well and mixed, plates were incubated for 1 h in the dark at room temperature, and fluorescence (485 nm excitation and 530 nm emission) was measured. IC50 values were derived from plots of fluorescence intensity vs. log drug concentration and fit to non-linear curves using a four-parameter Hill equation in Prism. Z factors to assess well-to-well variability and signal-to-noise ratios were calculated as previously described23. When steep slopes resulted in poor curve fit, slopes were fixed to a constant value of −6. For results with incomplete curves at low drug concentrations but at least 50% of the curve present, the upper plateau was constrained to that of drug-free wells on the same plate. Control P. falciparum Dd2 (MRA-156) and 3D7 (MRA-102) strains from MR4/BEI Resources were maintained in culture, synchronised with a magnetic column, and assayed, beginning at the ring-stage, approximately monthly. The ex-vivo ring-stage survival assay, which entails comparing parasitaemias 66 h after a 6 h incubation with 700 nM DHA with that of untreated controls, was performed as previously described23.

Genotyping

For genotyping, parasite DNA was extracted from filter paper blood spots using Chelex-100 and analysed by molecular inversion probe (MIP) capture and deep sequencing, using a MIP panel with probes targeting 80 genes of interest, as previously described21,24. To resolve ambiguities, some PfK13 sequences were additionally analysed by dideoxy sequencing, as previously described8. Sequencing reads are available in the National Center for Biotechnology Information Archive (BioProject PRJNA850445). Raw sequencing data were analysed using MIPTools. Copy numbers were estimated based on sample and probe normalised depth of coverage from 31 unique probes for pfmdr1 and 21 probes for plasmepsin 2/3; copy number >1.7 was considered multiple. The Dd2 strain, which has amplified pfmdr1 and is single copy for plasmepsin 2/3, and the G8 clone of Cambodian isolate KH001_053, with one copy of pfmdr1 and two copies of plasmepsin 2/3, were included as controls.

Statistical analysis

All statistical tests were done in R Studio (version 2024.09.1 + 394). Baseline characteristics of participants and isolates were computed as prevalences, medians with interquartile ranges (IQR), or means with standard deviations. Summary statistics for ex vivo susceptibilities were median IC50 with IQR. To assess well-to-well variability and signal-to-noise ratios in the fluorescence readout of ex-vivo assays, Z factors were calculated as: Z = 1 – ([3 × SDinfected drug free + 3 × SDuninfected] / [meaninfected drug free – meanuninfected])48. The Mann-Kendall non-parametric test was used to detect monotonic trends (change over time in a consistent positive or negative direction) in drug susceptibilities with the Kendall package, using months as categorical variables. Genotype-phenotype associations for known resistance markers were evaluated with pairwise Wilcoxon texts. Potential novel markers were assessed for all SNPs with data for >50% of isolates available and at least one wild-type and mutant sample identified. The Kruskal-Wallis test with Benjamini-Hochberg correction for multiple comparisons was used to identify loci with different median drug susceptibilities between wild-type, mixed, and mutant isolates, followed by pairwise-Wilcoxon tests with Benjamini-Hochberg correction for multiple comparisons. For loci with at least 20 samples per category, a significant difference between IC50s for wild type and mutants was required. Statistical tests were two-tailed, and significance was considered p ≤ 0.05.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (842.6KB, pdf)
Reporting Summary (72.4KB, pdf)

Source data

Source Data (694.4KB, xlsx)

Acknowledgements

The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health (R01AI075045, PJR; R01AI173557, MDC; U19AI089674, PJR; RO1AI117001, PJR; R01AI139179, PJR; and D43TW010526, PJR), the Medicines for Malaria Venture (RD/15/0001; PJR), and the Gates Foundation (INV-035751; MDC). We thank study participants and staff members of the clinics where samples were collected. We thank Patrick Angutoko, Jackson Asiimwe, Evans Muhanguzi, Solomon Opio, Innocent Tibagambirwa, Frida G. Ceja, Shreeya Garg, and Sevil Chelebieva for performance of laboratory studies in Uganda; Bienvenu Nsengimaana, David Giesbrecht, Rebecca Crudale, Alfred Simkin, and Oriana Kreutzfeld for assistance with deep sequencing and genomic analyses; and Selina Bopp for the gift of the control KH001_053 clone. The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report.

Author contributions

M.O., S.O., P.K.T., T.K., Y.T., O.B., J.L., and M.D.C. performed parasitology and genomics experiments and archived data. JL provided administrative and logistical support. S.T., S.L.N., J.A.B., R.A.C., M.D.C., and P.J.R. provided oversight for all experiments. M.D.C. led the analysis of the data. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript. All authors had full access to all the data, and the corresponding authors had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Data availability

Raw sequencing reads are available in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (BioProject PRJNA850445). K13 sequences for samples genotyped using dideoxy sequencing are available in GeneBank using accession numbers: PV933992 - PV934159. MIP probes and PCR primers used in this study are available in Supplemental Table 9 of reference 24 at: https://github.com/PJRosenthalLab/2022_Tumwebaze_NatCom/blob/main/Supplemental_Table_9_Design%20of%20drug%20resistance%20MIP%20panel.xlsx. Source data for all figures and tables are provided as a Source Data file Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

MIPWrangler and MIPTools software is available on GitHub (https://github.com/bailey-lab).

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Martin Okitwi, Stephen Orena.

These authors jointly supervised this work: Melissa D. Conrad, Philip J. Rosenthal.

Contributor Information

Melissa D. Conrad, Email: melissa.conrad@ucsf.edu

Philip J. Rosenthal, Email: philip.rosenthal@ucsf.edu

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-025-62810-x.

References

  • 1. World Health Organization. WHO Guidelines for Malaria. (World Health Organization, 2023).
  • 2.Duffey, M. et al. Combating antimicrobial resistance in malaria, HIV and tuberculosis. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.23, 461–479 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.White, N. J. & Chotivanich, K. Artemisinin-resistant malaria. Clin. Microbiol Rev.37, e0010924 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Plowe, C. V. Malaria chemoprevention and drug resistance: a review of the literature and policy implications. Malar. J.21, 104 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Conrad, M. D. & Rosenthal, P. J. Antimalarial drug resistance in Africa: the calm before the storm? Lancet Infect. Dis.19, e338–e351 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ross, L. S. & Fidock, D. A. Elucidating mechanisms of drug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum. Cell Host Microbe26, 35–47 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wicht, K. J., Mok, S. & Fidock, D. A. Molecular mechanisms of drug resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Annu Rev. Microbiol74, 431–454 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rasmussen, S. A. et al. Changing antimalarial drug sensitivities in Uganda. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.61, e01516–e01517 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Florimond, C. et al. Impact of piperaquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum on malaria treatment effectiveness in The Guianas: a descriptive epidemiological study. Lancet Infect. Dis.24, 161–171 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dhorda, M., Amaratunga, C. & Dondorp, A. M. Artemisinin and multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum - a threat for malaria control and elimination. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis.34, 432–439 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rosenthal, P. J., Asua, V. & Conrad, M. D. Emergence, transmission dynamics and mechanisms of artemisinin partial resistance in malaria parasites in Africa. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.22, 373–384 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Uwimana, A. et al. Emergence and clonal expansion of in vitro artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum kelch13 R561H mutant parasites in Rwanda. Nat. Med.26, 1602–1608 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Uwimana, A. et al. Association of Plasmodium falciparum kelch13 R561H genotypes with delayed parasite clearance in Rwanda: an open-label, single-arm, multicentre, therapeutic efficacy study. Lancet Infect. Dis.21, 1120–1128 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ishengoma, D. S. et al. Evidence of artemisinin partial resistance in northwestern Tanzania: clinical and molecular markers of resistance. Lancet Infect. Dis.24, 1225–1233 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Conrad, M. D. et al. Evolution of partial resistance to artemisinins in malaria parasites in Uganda. N. Engl. J. Med.389, 722–732 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Balikagala, B. et al. Evidence of artemisinin-resistant malaria in Africa. N. Engl. J. Med.385, 1163–1171 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mihreteab, S. et al. Increasing prevalence of artemisinin-resistant HRP2-negative malaria in Eritrea. N. Engl. J. Med.389, 1191–1202 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fola, A. A. et al. Plasmodium falciparum resistant to artemisinin and diagnostics have emerged in Ethiopia. Nat. Microbiol.8, 1911–1919 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gregson, A. & Plowe, C. V. Mechanisms of resistance of malaria parasites to antifolates. Pharm. Rev.57, 117–145 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gesase, S. et al. High resistance of Plasmodium falciparum to sulphadoxine/pyrimethamine in northern Tanzania and the emergence of dhps resistance mutation at Codon 581. PLoS One4, e4569 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Asua, V. et al. Changing prevalence of potential mediators of aminoquinoline, antifolate, and artemisinin resistance across Uganda. J. Infect. Dis.223, 985–994 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tumwebaze, P. et al. Impact of antimalarial treatment and chemoprevention on the drug sensitivity of malaria parasites isolated from Ugandan children. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.59, 3018–3030 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tumwebaze, P. K. et al. Drug susceptibility of Plasmodium falciparum in eastern Uganda: a longitudinal phenotypic and genotypic study. Lancet Microbe2, e441–e449 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tumwebaze, P. K. et al. Decreased susceptibility of Plasmodium falciparum to both dihydroartemisinin and lumefantrine in northern Uganda. Nat. Commun.13, 6353 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yeka, A. et al. Artesunate/amodiaquine versus artemether/lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Uganda: a randomized trial. J. Infect. Dis.213, 1134–1142 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yeka, A. et al. Comparative efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Ugandan children. J. Infect. Dis.219, 1112–1120 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rosenthal, P. J. Are artemisinin-based combination therapies for malaria beginning to fail in Africa?. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.105, 857–858 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ebong, C. et al. Efficacy and safety of artemether-lumefantrine and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria and prevalence of molecular markers associated with artemisinin and partner drug resistance in Uganda. Malar. J.20, 484 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Cooper, R. A. et al. Lack of artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum in Uganda based on parasitological and molecular assays. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.59, 5061–5064 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Witkowski, B. et al. Novel phenotypic assays for the detection of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Cambodia: in-vitro and ex-vivo drug-response studies. Lancet Infect. Dis.13, 1043–1049 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Duvalsaint, M. et al. Balanced impacts of fitness and drug pressure on the evolution of PfMDR1 polymorphisms in Plasmodium falciparum. Malar. J.20, 292 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ross, L. S. et al. Emerging Southeast Asian PfCRT mutations confer Plasmodium falciparum resistance to the first-line antimalarial piperaquine. Nat. Commun.9, 3314 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mungthin, M. et al. Association between the pfmdr1 gene and in vitro artemether and lumefantrine sensitivity in Thai isolates of Plasmodium falciparum. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.83, 1005–1009 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Amato, R. et al. Genetic markers associated with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine failure in Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Cambodia: a genotype-phenotype association study. Lancet Infect. Dis.17, 164–173 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Francis, D. et al. Geographic differences in antimalarial drug efficacy in Uganda are explained by differences in endemicity and not by known molecular markers of drug resistance. J. Infect. Dis.193, 978–986 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Dimbu P. R. et al. Continued low efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine in Angola in 2019. Antimicrob Agents Chemother65, e01949 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 37.Gansane, A. et al. Anti-malarial efficacy and resistance monitoring of artemether-lumefantrine and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine shows inadequate efficacy in children in Burkina Faso, 2017-2018. Malar. J.20, 48 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Moriarty, L. F. et al. Therapeutic efficacy of artemisinin-based combination therapies in Democratic Republic of the Congo and investigation of molecular markers of antimalarial resistance. Am. J. Trop. Med Hyg.105, 1067–1075 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Laury, J. E. et al. Efficacy and safety of artemether-lumefantrine against uncomplicated falciparum malaria infection in Tanzania, 2022: a single-arm clinical trial. J. Infect. Dis.231, 251–259 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Plucinski, M. M. et al. Variation in calculating and reporting antimalarial efficacy against Plasmodium falciparum in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of published reports. Am. J. Trop. Med Hyg.104, 1820–1829 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mwesigwa, A. et al. Assessment of different genotyping markers and algorithms for distinguishing Plasmodium falciparum recrudescence from reinfection in Uganda. Sci. Rep.15, 4375 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Schnoz, A. et al. Genotyping methods to distinguish Plasmodium falciparum recrudescence from new infection for the assessment of antimalarial drug efficacy: an observational, single-centre, comparison study. Lancet Microbe5, 100914 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.van Schalkwyk, D. A. et al. Treatment failure in a UK malaria patient harboring genetically variant Plasmodium falciparum from Uganda with reduced in vitro susceptibility to artemisinin and lumefantrine. Clin. Infect. Dis.78, 445–452 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Pierreux, J. et al. Failure of artemether-lumefantrine therapy in travellers returning to Belgium with Plasmodium falciparum malaria: an observational case series with genomic analysis. J. Travel Med.31, taad165 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Oliveira, R. et al. Artemether-lumefantrine resistant falciparum malaria imported from Uganda. J. Travel Med.32, taaf013 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bigira, V. et al. Protective efficacy and safety of three antimalarial regimens for the prevention of malaria in young Ugandan children: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS Med.11, e1001689 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Martinez-Vega, R. et al. Regional action needed to halt antimalarial drug resistance in Africa. Lancet405, 7–10 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Zhang, J. H., Chung, T. D. & Oldenburg, K. R. A simple statistical parameter for use in evaluation and validation of high throughput screening assays. J. Biomol. Screen4, 67–73 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information (842.6KB, pdf)
Reporting Summary (72.4KB, pdf)
Source Data (694.4KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

Raw sequencing reads are available in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (BioProject PRJNA850445). K13 sequences for samples genotyped using dideoxy sequencing are available in GeneBank using accession numbers: PV933992 - PV934159. MIP probes and PCR primers used in this study are available in Supplemental Table 9 of reference 24 at: https://github.com/PJRosenthalLab/2022_Tumwebaze_NatCom/blob/main/Supplemental_Table_9_Design%20of%20drug%20resistance%20MIP%20panel.xlsx. Source data for all figures and tables are provided as a Source Data file Source data are provided with this paper.

MIPWrangler and MIPTools software is available on GitHub (https://github.com/bailey-lab).


Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES