Skip to main content
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1996 Oct;71(4):1695–1706. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79371-2

Atomic-scale analysis of the solvation thermodynamics of hydrophobic hydration.

S R Durell 1, A Wallqvist 1
PMCID: PMC1233639  PMID: 8889147

Abstract

Molecular dynamics simulations are used to model the transfer thermodynamics of krypton from the gas phase into water. Extra long, nanosecond simulations are required to reduce the statistical uncertainty of the calculated "solvation" enthalpy to an acceptable level. Thermodynamic integration is used to calculate the "solvation" free energy, which together with the enthalpy is used to calculate the "solvation" entropy. A comparison series of simulations are conducted using a single Lennard-Jones sphere model of water to identify the contribution of hydrogen bonding to the thermodynamic quantities. In contrast to the classical "iceberg" model of hydrophobic hydration, the favorable enthalpy change for the transfer process at room temperature is found to be due primarily to the strong van der Waals interaction between the solute and solvent. Although some stabilization of hydrogen bonding does occur in the solvation shell, this is overshadowed by a destabilization due to packing constraints. Similarly, whereas some of the unfavorable change in entropy is attributed to the reduced rotational motion of the solvation shell waters, the major component is due to a decrease in the number of positional arrangements associated with the translational motions.

Full text

PDF
1695

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beveridge D. L., DiCapua F. M. Free energy via molecular simulation: applications to chemical and biomolecular systems. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1989;18:431–492. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.18.060189.002243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dill K. A. Dominant forces in protein folding. Biochemistry. 1990 Aug 7;29(31):7133–7155. doi: 10.1021/bi00483a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Madan B., Lee B. Role of hydrogen bonds in hydrophobicity: the free energy of cavity formation in water models with and without the hydrogen bonds. Biophys Chem. 1994 Aug;51(2-3):279–289. doi: 10.1016/0301-4622(94)00049-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mezei M., Beveridge D. L. Free energy simulations. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1986;482:1–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1986.tb20933.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Pratt L. R., Pohorille A. Theory of hydrophobicity: transient cavities in molecular liquids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Apr;89:2995–2999. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.7.2995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wallqvist A., Covell D. G. On the origins of the hydrophobic effect: observations from simulations of n-dodecane in model solvents. Biophys J. 1996 Aug;71(2):600–608. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79260-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Young L., Jernigan R. L., Covell D. G. A role for surface hydrophobicity in protein-protein recognition. Protein Sci. 1994 May;3(5):717–729. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560030501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES