Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2025 Jun 3;114(9):2104–2105. doi: 10.1111/apa.70166

How Paediatricians Can Help Parents to Deal With the Challenges Presented by the Digital Age

Petr Kellner 1,2,
PMCID: PMC12336930  PMID: 40458029

Abbreviation

ADHD

attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

Raising children is one of the most important responsibilities for parents because it plays a crucial role in shaping their overall development. Despite this, formal parenting education is rarely part of the school curricula, leaving many parents to navigate the challenges on their own. Each generation faces distinct obstacles, but the rapid rise of digital technology and sedentary lifestyles, along with eroding societal values, presents the current generation of parents with unprecedented difficulties. This perspective explores the challenges that the digital age poses for parents' competencies and emphasises the need for increased awareness and guidance from child health professionals.

Imagine a typical scene in a paediatrician's office. A sick child arrives with a parent and they are both glued to their smartphones or tablets while they are waiting for their appointment. The doctor treats the immediate concern, perhaps a cough, cold or fever, but overlooks the more pressing, long‐term issues. They might mention that the child is obese, but do not mention that the parent is also obese, despite the fact that it creates behaviour that the child is likely to adopt. Furthermore, the intrusive influence of the digital devices on the family's interactions goes unchallenged. How can the paediatrician question why the child and their parent brought their own screens when some waiting rooms, kindergartens and schools provide screens for children.

Frequent screen exposure at a young age poses significant risks to eye development. It has been reported to contribute to the rise in myopia, due to insufficient outdoor activity and excessive near‐vision work [1]. A more critical point is that early and extensive digital media exposure can hinder brain development, by limiting the formation of new synapses essential for learning and cognitive growth. This synaptic reduction may contribute to impairments in areas such as speech, memory, attention and executive function [2, 3]. In addition, disturbances in white matter integrity, which are crucial for efficient brain communication and processing, have also been evident [4]. While this does not imply direct causation, or deny the possibility of screen‐based learning, the core issue is the brain's limited capacity. Time spent primarily on audiovisual digital input displaces richer multisensory experiences. For instance, simply exploring a picture book engages visual perception, tactile feedback, listening, coordination, fine motor skills, imagination and even some physical movement. So why do people rely on digital devices when far superior alternatives exist? The younger the child, the greater the potential impact, given the rapid pace of early brain development, which continues until around 25–26 years of age. Research on the effects of digital technologies in older children and adults has shown somewhat mixed results. While there are potential benefits when these tools are used appropriately, most of the evidence urges caution against widespread digitalisation in schools, for several reasons. Reduced information retention and performance impairment are just some of the concerns that have been cited. In addition to academic outcomes, studies have also highlighted broader negative effects on quality of life. These have included diminished self‐control, emotional stability, increased anxiety and depression and lower overall well‐being [5]. Therefore, parents and educators must critically evaluate whether the potential of these modest benefits outweighs the considerable and well‐documented risks of increased digitalisation.

Moreover, the effects of digital media on children have been shown to closely resemble the characteristics of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) [6]. While ADHD is recognised as a neurodevelopmental disorder, with a strong genetic component, environmental factors are crucial to its aetiology [7]. Some experts have suggested that ADHD arises in sensitive individuals due to excessive stimuli and that symptoms may subside when exposure to digital media is limited. The increasing rate of ADHD diagnoses aligns with this theory. In the digital era, sensory overload places unprecedented demands on the human brain. Negative outcomes are understandable, given that the structure and functioning of the brain have remained virtually unchanged for 35 000 years. In contrast, the overstimulating digital environment has only existed for a few decades. Encouraging outdoor activities, skill development and active entertainment has been shown to reduce overstimulation and this aligns with the information overload theory [8]. Quieter environments, consistent routines and structured rules also aid healthy development. Denying children access to desired screens is similar to avoiding the constant provision of new toys or the immediate fulfilment of every wish. It can also help to teach children to be patient, not get frustrated and show perseverance [9]. “To grow up healthy, children need to sit less and play more” [10].

The path ahead is demanding, but addressing these issues is vital for both children's well‐being and the future of society. Paediatricians and child health specialists have a crucial opportunity to raise awareness and guide parents on how to manage digital media exposure and other health risks. Given the limited time they have with each patient, and their reluctance to address sensitive issues directly, other approaches are required. Starting points could include providing parents with information from accessible resources, such as the World Health Organization and American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines, or insights from experts like the German neuroscientist and psychiatrist Professor Manfred Spitzer. Although public awareness and regulation are lacking, actively engaging parents is essential to ensuring children's health.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Funding: The author received no specific funding for this work.

Data Availability Statement

The author has nothing to report.

References

  • 1. Foreman J., Salim A. T., Praveen A., et al., “Association Between Digital Smart Device Use and Myopia: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Lancet Digital Health 3, no. 12 (2021): e806–e818, 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00135-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Madigan S., Browne D., Racine N., Mori C., and Tough S., “Association Between Screen Time and Children's Performance on a Developmental Screening Test,” JAMA Pediatrics 173, no. 3 (2019): 244–250, 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.1500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. McHarg G., Ribner A., Devine R. T., and Hughes C., “Screen Time and Executive Function in Toddlerhood: A Longitudinal Study,” Frontiers in Psychology 11 (2020): 570392, 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.570392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Hutton J. S., Dudley J., Horowitz‐Kraus T., DeWitt T., and Holland S. K., “Associations Between Screen‐Based Media Use and Brain White Matter Integrity in Preschool‐Aged Children,” JAMA Pediatrics 174, no. 1 (2020): 3869, 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.3869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Twenge J. M. and Campbell W. K., “Associations Between Screen Time and Lower Psychological Well‐Being Among Children and Adolescents: Evidence From a Population‐Based Study,” Preventive Medicine Reports 18, no. 12 (2018): 271–283, 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Corkin M. T., Peterson E. R., Henderson A. M. E., Waldie K. E., Reese E., and Morton S. M. B., “Preschool Screen Media Exposure, Executive Functions, and Symptoms of Inattention/Hyperactivity,” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 73 (2021): 101237, 10.1016/j.appdev.2020.101237. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Faraone S. V. and Larsson H., “Genetics of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder,” Molecular Psychiatry 24, no. 4 (2019): 562–575, 10.1038/s41380-018-0070-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Hołyst J. A., Mayr P., Thelwall M., et al., “Protect Our Environment From Information Overload,” Nature Human Behaviour 8, no. 3 (2024): 402–403, 10.1038/s41562-024-01833-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Chen L. and Yeung W. J. J., “Delayed Gratification Predicts Behavioral and Academic Outcomes: Examining the Validity of the Delay‐Of‐Gratification Choice Paradigm in Singaporean Young Children,” Applied Developmental Science 29, no. 2 (2024): 7366, 10.1080/10888691.2024.2307366. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. World Health Organization , “To Grow Up Healthy, Children Need to Sit Less and Play More,” accessed March 3, 2025, https://www.who.int/news/item/24‐04‐2019‐to‐grow‐up‐healthy‐children‐need‐to‐sit‐less‐and‐play‐more.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The author has nothing to report.


Articles from Acta Paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES