Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2025 Apr 23;114(9):2298–2305. doi: 10.1111/apa.70107

Trends in Paediatric Viral Meningitis and Encephalitis With Unconfirmed Aetiology: A Spanish Population‐Based Study, 2016–2020

Marina Pons‐Espinal 1, Noemi López‐Perea 2,3, Josefa Masa‐Calles 2,3, Carmen Muñoz‐Almagro 3,4,5, David Tarragó 3,6, Cristian Launes 1,3,4,7,
PMCID: PMC12336933  PMID: 40264391

ABSTRACT

Aim

The prevalence of meningitis and encephalitis of unknown aetiology in Spanish children has not been specifically documented before. The aim of this study is to describe the epidemiology and trends of these clinical conditions between 2016 and 2020.

Methods

Retrospective study analysing hospitalised children < 15 years with meningitis and encephalitis/encephalomyelitis of unknown origin (ICD‐10 codes) in Spain (2016–2020). Data from National Registry of Hospitalizations and National Institute for Statistics were used to calculate age‐stratified hospitalisation rates (HR). Statistical analysis included Poisson regression to calculate hospitalisation rate ratios (HRR) by age groups and years and forecasting methods to predict 2020 HRs.

Results

Four thousand six hundred childrens were hospitalised with viral meningitis and encephalitis‐encephalomyelitis of unknown origin, resulting in a HR of 7.8/105 inhabitants. The highest HR was observed in children under 1 year (49.1/105) and those aged 5–9 (10.4/105). The global HR for viral meningitis (3.64/105) was lower than for encephalitis‐encephalomyelitis (4.2/105). Hospitalisations decreased from 1475 (2016) to 452 (2020), attributed to enhanced pathogen detection methods and COVID‐19 preventive measures.

Conclusion

Undiagnosed central nervous system entities remain a significant cause of paediatric hospitalisations in Spain, despite a declining incidence. Enhanced diagnostic strategies, including expanded microbiological testing and molecular epidemiology surveillance, could prove beneficial.

Keywords: children, encephalitis, hospitalizations, meningitis, Spain


Abbreviations

CI

confidence interval

CNS

central nervous system

CSF

cerebrospinal fluid

HRR

Hospitalisation Rate

HRR

Hospitalisation Rate Ratio

INE

National Institute of Statistics

NHR‐CMBD

National Hospitalisation Registry—Minimum Basic Data Set

Summary.

  • This study analyses paediatric encephalitis‐encephalomyelitis and meningitis with unknown aetiology in Spain (2016–2020), showing significant hospitalisation decreases, particularly during the COVID‐19 pandemic.

  • Advanced diagnostic techniques and COVID‐19 related interventions may have contributed to this declining trend.

  • The findings underscore the importance of developing more accurate diagnostic methods for central nervous system infections.

1. Introduction

Meningitis and encephalitis are infectious and/or immune‐mediated diseases of the central nervous system (CNS) that can lead to serious consequences and potentially fatal outcomes. Infections, mostly caused by viruses, are often the cause or trigger of these episodes. The incidence and aetiology of meningitis and encephalitis vary by age and geographical location [1]. However, despite extensive diagnostic efforts, the cause remains unidentified in over half of cases [2, 3]. A wide range of pathogens can cause these diseases, consequently necessitating the use of multiple microbiological tests to establish the aetiological diagnosis [4]. Additionally, significant challenges remain in identifying causative microbiological agents. These include detecting unknown pathogens that may cause or contribute to disease development and monitoring emerging infectious outbreaks in new geographical regions.

Advances in vaccination and surveillance have significantly reduced the burden of infectious meningitis. Currently, viral meningitis is more prevalent than bacterial meningitis (accounting for nearly 30% of all cases) but is associated with lower mortality rates and fewer complications [5]. This condition is commonly characterised by the sudden onset of signs and symptoms of meningeal inflammation, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pleocytosis and the absence of microorganisms on Gram stain and/or on routine culture [6]. The global incidence of viral meningitis ranges from 0.26 to 17 cases per 105 [7]. A study in New Zealand reported an incidence of 9.6 per 105 of aseptic meningitis in children in 2020 [8]. Viral meningitis affects different age groups, with more severe consequences in paediatric patients compared to adults. These clinical entities typically have two peaks during childhood: first during the initial months of life, then again around age 5 [9]. Seasonality has been observed in temperate climates, with peaks occurring in summer and autumn. Higher incidence rates are seen in tropical climates, aligning with the distribution patterns of enterovirus infections [10, 11]. Parechovirus, herpes simplex virus and varicella zoster are also known etiologies [7, 8, 11]. Encephalitis is characterised by an altered mental state and is often accompanied by acute fever, seizures, and/or neurological deficits. Pleocytosis in CSF, in conjunction with neuroimaging and electroencephalographic abnormalities, supports the diagnosis. Encephalitis is an important cause of morbidity and mortality, with variable incidences across regions and a higher incidence in children (< 15 years) and older adults (> 70 years). The range of encephalitis in children in western countries can vary from 10.5 to 13.8 per 105 inhabitants, with a median incidence rate of 2.2 per 105 in adults [12]. Globally, Japanese encephalitis remains the single largest cause of viral encephalitis. In western countries, herpes simplex virus is the most common cause, followed by enteroviruses, although their incidence is likely underestimated [2, 13]. Notably, enteroviruses cause periodic epidemics of brainstem encephalitis in paediatric cohorts, especially in East and Southeast Asia. Outbreaks of brainstem encephalitis caused by enterovirus A71 have also occurred in France [14], Germany [15, 16] and Spain [17, 18]. In European countries, the tick‐borne encephalitis virus is an important emerging cause of viral encephalitis [19].

Although the incidence and epidemiology of meningitis and encephalitis have been extensively studied in other settings [8, 12], to the best of our knowledge, there are no studies that characterise the cases of these clinical entities of unknown aetiology in the paediatric population in Spain. Therefore, this study aims to describe the epidemiological characteristics and temporal trends of paediatric encephalitis‐encephalomyelitis and meningitis cases with suspected viral aetiology but unidentified specific pathogens in Spain from 2016 to 2020.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Data Sources

A retrospective descriptive study was conducted using data from the National Hospitalisation Registry—Minimum Basic Data Set (NHR‐CMBD) for the period January 2016–December 2020 in Spain. The NHR‐CMBD is an integral part of Spain's Health Information System. This database holds anonymized standardised clinical‐administrative data from hospitalizations in both public and private hospitals, providing insights into patient morbidity. It is estimated to cover 99.5% of the Spanish population. The following data were extracted for each hospitalisation: age, sex, date of hospital admission and primary and secondary diagnoses codes (1–14) from January 1st, 2016 to December 31st, 2020. Diagnostic registration was performed by clinicians, without prior inter‐hospital diagnostic consensus due to the study's retrospective nature. Population data stratification by age group and calendar year were obtained from the National Institute of Statistics (INE).

2.2. Case Definition and Diagnostic Coding

The diagnostic code selection using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition (ICD‐10), encompassed suspected viral cases of central nervous system infection where the aetiology was not specified or sufficiently characterised. Cases of meningitis of unknown origin were defined as those hospitalisations including one or more codes as their primary or secondary diagnosis: A87.8, A87.9, G02.0, G03.0 or G03.9. Similarly, encephalitis and encephalomyelitis of unknown origin cases were defined as hospitalisations with any of these codes: A83.8, A83.9, A85.2, A85.8, A86, G04.00, G04.01, G04.81, G04.90 or G05.3 [20]. The Technical Unit of ICD‐10‐ES, operating under the Spanish Ministry of Health, maintains a comprehensive quality control system for diagnostic coding. This centralised unit oversees the development and implementation of coding materials, including standardised manuals, guidelines and regulations.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Descriptive analysis was conducted by year, age group (< 12 months; 1–4 years; 5–9 years; and 10–14 years) and diagnosis group according to the mentioned ICD‐10 codes (meningitis, encephalitis and encephalomyelitis of unknown origin).

Hospitalisation rates (HR) per 105 population were calculated by year and age group. To compare among the study years, rate ratios for hospitalisation (HRR) were calculated using Poisson regression. The first year, 2016, was taken as the reference, then the HRR were expressed as the ratio between the year rate (overall and by age group) and the rate for 2016 in the same group. Confidence intervals (95% CI) were also calculated through Poisson regression, and p‐values were defined as statistically significant if < 0.05 for both tails. HRs between age groups were compared using the chi‐square test, and results with p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata ‐version 17 (StataCorp, Texas, USA).

FORECAST.ETS function implementation in Excel 2023 (Microsoft, USA) enabled hospitalisation rate (HR) value forecasting for 2020 based on 2016–2019 data. FORECAST.ETS utilises the AAA version of the Exponential Triple Smoothing (ETS) algorithm to project historical trends [21]. This helped elucidate the trends during the period 2016–2019 and visualise the discrepancies between the expected outcomes for 2020 and the actual occurrences due to the COVID‐19 pandemic.

2.4. Ethical Considerations

The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee of the Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu (protocol PIC‐104‐21).

3. Results

A total of 18 427 hospitalizations due to meningitis and encephalitis‐encephalomyelitis of unknown origin were reported in Spain during 2016–2020 (global HR: 11.10/105 inhabitants). Children under 15 years of age represented 24.8% of the total cases (4600 hospitalizations), with a HR of 7.80/105 inhabitants, with the highest rates for both combined entities observed in patients under 1 year of age (HR: 49.1/105 inhabitants), followed by children aged 5–9 (HR: 10.4/105 inhabitants) (Table 1). The differences in HR between infants under 1 year and all other age groups were statistically significant (p < 0.01).

TABLE 1.

Meningitis and encephalitis‐encephalomyelitis of unknown origin in children under 15 years of age: Hospitalizations, hospitalisation rates and ratio of hospitalisation rates by year and age group.

Year group 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2016–2020 2017 HRR b (95% CI) 2018 HRR b (95% CI) 2019 HRR b (95% CI) 2020 HRR b (95% CI)
n HR a n HR a n HR a n HR a n HR a n HR a
< 1 year 249 60.7 252 63.6 162 42.8 182 50.3 87 24.8 932 49.1 1.04 (0.88–1.24) 0.7 (0.58–0.86) 0.82 (0.68–1.00) 0.42 (0.32–0.52)
1–4 year 687 10.4 278 4.20 335 5.10 321 4.91 125 1.93 1746 5.33 0.40 (0.35–0.46) 0.49 (0.43–0.56) 0.47 (0.41–0.53) 0.18 (0.15–0.22)
5–9 years 379 15.4 264 10.8 236 9.88 227 9.69 141 6.10 1247 10.4 0.70 (0.60–0.82) 0.64 (0.54–0.75) 0.63 (0.53–0.74) 0.39 (0.32–0.48)
10–14 years 160 6.75 141 5.83 140 5.66 135 5.36 99 3.90 675 5.48 0.86 (0.69–1.08) 0.83 (0.66–1.05) 0.79 (0.63–0.99) 0.57 (0.45–0.74)
Total < 15 years 1475 12.5 935 7.87 873 7.40 865 7.36 452 3.87 4600 7.80 0.63 (0.58–0.68) 0.59 (0.54–0.64) 0.59 (0.54–0.64) 0.31 (0.27–0.34)

Note: Spain, 2016–2020. Statistically significant values (p < 0.05) are highlighted in bold.

a

Hospitalisation rate/105.

b

Hospitalisation rate ratio. Reference year 2016.

Regarding meningitis of unknown origin, 2143 cases in children under 15 years were reported in Spain in the study period (HR 3.64/105 inhabitants), with the highest rates documented in patients under 1 year (HR: 38.2/105 inhabitants), significantly exceeding the HR registered in older age groups (Table 2) (p < 0.01). For encephalitis‐encephalomyelitis of unknown origin, 2457 hospitalisations were notified (overall HR: 4.17/105), and the highest HR was also observed in children under 1 year of age (HR: 10.9/105) (Table 3) which was statistically significantly higher than in all the other age groups (p < 0.01).

TABLE 2.

Meningitis of unknown origin in children under 15 years of age: Hospitalisations, hospitalisation rates and ratio of hospitalisation rates by year and age group.

Year group 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2016–2020 2017 HRR b (95% CI) 2018 HRR b (95% CI) 2019 HRR b (95% CI) 2020 HRR b (95% CI)
n HR a n HR a n HR a n HR a n HR a n HR a
< 1 year 188 45.8 211 53.24 123 32.5 141 39.0 61 17.4 724 38.2 1.16 (0.95–1.41) 0.70 (0.56–0.89) 0.84 (0.68–1.05) 0.37 (0.28–0.51)
1–4 years 288 4.37 102 1.54 126 1.92 92 1.41 25 0.39 633 1.93 0.35 (0.28–0.44) 0.43 (0.35–0.54) 0.32 (0.25–0.40) 0.08 (0.05–0.13)
5–9 years 208 8.44 128 5.25 104 4.36 84 3.59 31 1.34 555 4.65 0.62 (0.50–0.77) 0.51 (0.41–0.65) 0.42 (0.33–0.54) 0.16 (0.11–0.23)
10–14 years 59 2.49 61 2.52 45 1.82 43 1.71 23 0.91 231 1.88 1.01 (0.70–1.44) 0.73 (0.49–1.07) 0.68 (0.46–1.01) 0.34 (0.22–0.59)
Total < 15 years 743 6.28 502 4.23 398 3.37 360 3.06 140 1.20 2143 3.64 0.67 (0.60–0.75) 0.53 (0.47–0.60) 0.48 (0.43–0.55) 0.19 (0.16–0.23)

Note: Spain, 2016–2020. Statistically significant values (p < 0.05) are highlighted in bold.

a

Hospitalisation rate/105.

b

Hospitalisation rate ratio. Reference year 2016.

TABLE 3.

Encephalitis and encephalomyelitis of unknown origin in children under 15 years of age: hospitalisations, hospitalisation rates and ratio of hospitalisation rates by year and age group.

Year group 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2016–2020 2017 HRR b (95% CI) 2018 HRR b (95% CI) 2019 HRR b (95% CI) 2020 HRR b (95% CI)
n HR a n HR a n HR a n HR a n HR a n HR a
< 1 year 61 14.9 41 10.3 39 10.3 41 11.3 26 7.41 208 11.0 0.69 (0.47–1.03) 0.69 (0.46–1.03) 0.76 (0.51–1.13) 0.49 (0.31–0.78)
1–4 years 399 6.05 176 2.66 209 3.18 229 3.50 100 1.55 1113 3.39 0.43 (0.37–0.52) 0.52 (0.44–0.62) 0.58 (0.49–0.68) 0.25 (0.20–0.32)
5–9 years 171 6.93 136 5.58 132 5.53 143 6.11 110 4.76 692 5.79 0.80 (0.64–1.00) 0.79 (0.63–1.00) 0.88 (0.70–1.09) 0.68 (0.54–0.87)
10–14 years 101 4.26 80 3.31 95 3.84 92 3.65 76 3.00 444 3.60 0.77 (0.59–1.03) 0.90 (0.68–1.19) 0.86 (0.64–1.13) 0.70 (0.52–0.94)
Total < 15 years 732 6.18 433 3.65 475 4.02 505 4.30 312 2.67 2457 4.17 0.58 (0.52–0.66) 0.65 (0.59–0.73) 0.69 (0.62–0.78) 0.43 (0.38–0.49)

Note: Spain, 2016–2020. Statistically significant values (p < 0.05) are highlighted in bold.

a

Hospitalisation rate/105.

b

Hospitalisation rate ratio. Reference year 2016.

The meningitis, encephalitis and encephalomyelitis of unknown aetiology HR decreased from 12.5/105 inhabitants in 2016 to 3.87/105 inhabitants in 2020 (Table 1). Figure 1 illustrates the HR trends between 2016 and 2020. Hospitalisation rate ratios (HRR) showed a significant decrease between each year compared to 2016. The most marked decrease in HRR was observed in the age group of 1–4 years (HRR 2020 compared to 2016: 0.18 95% CI: 0.15–0.22), followed by the 5–9 years (HRR 2020 compared to 2016: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.32–0.48) and the < 1 years (HRR 2020 compared to 2016: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.31–0.52). This decrease was largely attributed to changes in meningitis HR, dropping from 6.28/105 in 2016 to 1.20/105 in 2020 (HRR: 0.19 (95% CI: 0.16–0.23)) (Table 2). However, when examining encephalitis‐encephalomyelitis specifically, the HR decreased from 6.18/105 inhabitants in 2016 to 3.65/105 in 2017, followed by an incremental increase through 2019 and a pronounced drop in 2020 to 2.67/105, yielding a HRR: 0.43; 95% CI:0.38–0.49. The major HRR decrease was again observed in the age group of 1–4 years (HRR 2020 compared to 2016: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.20–0.32) (Table 3).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Forecasting hospitalisation rates in Spain for paediatric meningitis and encephalitis‐encephalomyelitis of unknown origin by age group in 2020. (a) < 1 year (b) 1–4 years (c) 5–9 years (d) 10–14 years.

The forecasting analysis revealed that the actual hospitalisation rates (HR) in 2020 for all entities were lower than predicted across all age groups, based on previous trends. Moreover, for infants under 1 year old and children aged 10–14 years, the actual HR fell below the lower confidence interval (Figure 1).

4. Discussion

Our study demonstrates substantial declines in hospitalisation rates for paediatric encephalitis and meningitis of unknown origin in Spain from 2016 to 2020, with meningitis rates exhibiting a significant decrease from 6.28/105 in 2016 to 1.20/105 in 2020. The HRR analysis revealed consistent decreases across years, reaching its nadir in 2020 (HRR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.45–0.74), representing a decrease of more than 70% in hospitalisations over the five‐year study period. More specifically, meningitis hospitalisations decreased by 81%, while encephalitis hospitalisations showed a 57% reduction. Upon analysing the pre‐pandemic period to mitigate the influence of the pandemic, the overall reduction was calculated at 40% (meningitis hospitalizations decreased by 52%, and encephalitis hospitalizations by 31%). These findings should be contextualised within the historical diagnostic challenges in CNS infections, as studies have shown that a significant proportion of cases remain undiagnosed—up to 64% of aseptic meningitis and between 27.5% and 79% of encephalitis cases [8, 22]. This high percentage of unknown aetiology has been gradually improving with the evolution of diagnostic methods, from basic testing to advanced techniques like PCR panels and metagenomics [23, 24, 25, 26], though variations in diagnostic capabilities across different healthcare settings continue to influence reported rates.

Regarding demographic distribution, hospitalizations for meningitis or encephalitis in the paediatric population under 15 years of age constituted approximately one‐quarter of all such hospitalizations across age groups. Age‐stratified analysis revealed significantly higher rates in children under 1 year (49.1/105 over the study period), while the 1–4 years age group showed the most pronounced decline (82% reduction between 2016 and 2020; 53% between 2016 and 2019). Our results align with data from other European countries reporting high incidence in infants (38.7/105 in children younger than 6 months) and peak rates of 58.7/105 just after birth [9]. Additionally, similar trends in incidence decline were observed in England [27], where viral meningitis rates among children aged 1–14 years decreased significantly from an average of 13.5/105 during 1968–1985 to 5.2/105 during 1989–2011, largely due to advancements in diagnostics and vaccination programmes. Interestingly, this decline was entirely restricted to children aged 1–14 years, while infants under 1 year exhibited stable or increasing rates during recent years. In fact, during the latter part of this period (2007–2011), infants accounted for 73% of all cases compared to only 11% during earlier decades (1968–1985). More recent data from England between 2013 and 2019 [28] showed that infants under 3 months had an incidence rate of viral meningitis as high as 504/105, driven primarily by enteroviruses (84.9%), followed by parechoviruses and herpes simplex virus. These findings emphasise the biological vulnerability of young infants to first‐time neurotropic viruses exposure, such as enteroviruses (EV) [18], and highlight how systematic screening protocols requiring lumbar punctures in febrile young infants improve case detection [8]. Again, the widespread implementation of syndromic molecular testing during recent years, especially the late 2010s, enables more detections and etiological diagnoses. This increased diagnostic capability likely explains part of the observed reduction in cases of unknown origin in our study.

Concerning encephalitis, our findings align with studies from Australia and the United States reporting similar encephalitis incidence rates of 4.17–7.3/105 in children [29, 30]. After an initial decline (2016–2017), our data show steady rates through 2017–2019. The 2019 Global Burden of Disease Study similarly documented a reduction in the age‐standardised incidence rate, mortality rates, and disability‐adjusted life years rate for encephalitis over the last 30 years [5]. However, this decline reached an inflection point during 2011–2013 and subsequently plateaued. Several complex factors contribute to this observed trend: climate change affecting vector‐borne transmission patterns, the emergence of new pathogens (particularly EV‐A71 and West Nile virus), and the increasing utilisation of immunosuppressive therapy in medical treatment [31, 32]. Upon examination of trends across different settings, variations emerge due to local epidemiological patterns, differences in diagnostic capabilities between healthcare systems and distinct viral circulation patterns [27, 33, 34].

Notably, hospitalisation rates reached their lowest levels across all groups in 2020, coinciding with COVID‐19 non‐pharmaceutical interventions. This reduction mirrors findings from other studies documenting dramatic decreases in invasive infections caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae , Haemophilus influenzae and Neisseria meningitidis, all of which share respiratory transmission routes [35]. Similarly, viral diseases such as respiratory syncytial virus and influenza saw marked declines during this period [36]. The implementation of school closures significantly contributed to this decline by limiting transmission opportunities among children, while broader containment measures provided additional protection against various infectious agents. However, it is important to note that our study's endpoint in 2020 precludes us from analysing potential rebounds following the lifting of COVID‐19 restrictions. In England, for instance, a significant increase in paediatric viral meningitis post‐pandemic has been reported (from 1.8/105 during restrictions to 4.2/105 after restrictions were lifted) [28]. In our opinion, the marked reduction observed during the pandemic period highlights significant opportunities for improving diagnostic capabilities in cases of CNS infections that currently lack clear diagnoses. Particularly, advances in metagenomics technology, along with better methods for diagnosing immune‐mediated encephalitis that mimics viral CNS infections, should help increase the proportion of patients who receive definitive etiologic diagnoses [26, 33].

Several limitations merit consideration in our study. First, the use of ICD‐10 codes for case identification presents inherent challenges in classification accuracy. While we carefully selected codes that indicate unspecified or incompletely characterised aetiology, some codes (particularly A87.8) could potentially include cases where partial etiological information exists. Our inclusive approach might have captured some cases where the pathogen was partially characterised, though not definitively identified. Second, variations in coding practices across different hospitals and regions could affect case classification. This is particularly relevant for codes like A87.8 versus G03.8, where the distinction between “other specified” and “unspecified” causes might be interpreted differently across institutions. Third, our study's focus on cases with suspected viral aetiology might underestimate the total burden of central nervous system infections of unknown origin, as some cases might be coded under more general categories. However, this approach enhances specificity in tracking cases where viral aetiology is suspected but unconfirmed, aligning with our primary research objective. Finally, while the Spanish Hospitalisation Registry provides comprehensive coverage, changes in diagnostic capabilities and coding practices over the study period might influence temporal trends. Nevertheless, these limitations are inherent to large‐scale epidemiological studies using administrative data and do not substantially impact our main findings regarding age‐related differences and epidemiological trends.

In conclusion, while paediatric meningitis and encephalitis remain significant concerns in Spain, our findings demonstrate important epidemiological shifts. The implementation of advanced surveillance systems incorporating molecular diagnostics will be essential for future disease management [30]. Future research should focus on identifying specific etiological agents and optimising intervention strategies, particularly in the context of evolving diagnostic capabilities and changing patterns of disease transmission.

Author Contributions

Marina Pons‐Espinal: conceptualization, data curation, investigation, writing – review and editing, writing – original draft. Noemi López‐Perea: writing – review and editing, methodology, data curation, validation, formal analysis, investigation, writing – original draft, conceptualization. Josefa Masa‐Calles: methodology, data curation, formal analysis, writing – review and editing, conceptualization. Carmen Muñoz‐Almagro: conceptualization, investigation, writing – review and editing. David Tarragó: investigation, methodology, writing – review and editing, project administration, funding acquisition. Cristian Launes: writing – review and editing, writing – original draft, investigation, methodology, formal analysis, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition.

Ethics Statement

This study involves the use of patient medical data from the NHR‐CMBD. These data are hosted by the Spanish Ministry of Health. Researchers working in public and private institutions can request the databases by completing, signing, and sending a questionnaire available on the Ministry website. In this questionnaire, a signed confidentiality commitment is required. According to this confidentiality commitment, researchers cannot provide the data to other researchers, who must request the data directly from the Ministry. All data are anonymized and de‐identified by the Ministry before being provided to applicants. Thus, no ethical approval or informed consent was required by the Spanish human research act to conduct this data analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding: This work was supported by Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP21PI05.

Marina Pons‐Espinal and Noemi López‐Perea contributed equally to this work and share first authorship.

References

  • 1. Gundamraj V. and Reuben D. B., “Viral Meningitis and Encephalitis: An Update,” Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases 36, no. 3 (2023): 177–185, 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Kumar R., “Understanding and Managing Acute Encephalitis,” F1000Research 9 (2020): 60, 10.12688/f1000research.20634.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Venkatesan A., Tunkel A. R., Bloch K. C., et al., “Case Definitions, Diagnostic Algorithms, and Priorities in Encephalitis: Consensus Statement of the International Encephalitis Consortium,” Clinical Infectious Diseases 57, no. 8 (2013): 1114–1128, 10.1093/cid/cit458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Vila J., Bosch J., and Muñoz‐Almagro C., “Molecular Diagnosis of the Central Nervous System (CNS) Infections,” Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiologia Clinica (English ed.) 39, no. 8 (2021): 403–410, 10.1016/j.eimce.2020.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. GBD 2019 Meningitis Antimicrobial Resistance Collaborators , “Global, Regional, and National Burden of Meningitis and Its Aetiologies, 1990–2019: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019,” Lancet Neurology 22, no. 8 (2023): 685–711, 10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00195-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Tapiainen T., Prevots R., Izurieta H. S., et al., “Aseptic Meningitis: Case Definition and Guidelines for Collection, Analysis and Presentation of Immunization Safety Data,” Vaccine 25, no. 31 (2007): 5793–5802, 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.04.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Cantu R. M. and Das J. M., “Viral Meningitis,” in StatPearls (StatPearls Publishing, 2023). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. McBride M., Williman J., Best E., et al., “The Epidemiology of Aseptic Meningitis in New Zealand Children From 1991 to 2020,” Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 58, no. 11 (2022): 1980–1989, 10.1111/jpc.16131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Hviid A. and Melbye M., “The Epidemiology of Viral Meningitis Hospitalization in Childhood,” Epidemiology 18, no. 6 (2007): 695–701, 10.1097/ede.0b013e3181567d31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Al‐Qahtani S. M., Shati A. A., Alqahtani Y. A., and Ali A. S., “Etiology, Clinical Phenotypes, Epidemiological Correlates, Laboratory Biomarkers and Diagnostic Challenges of Pediatric Viral Meningitis: Descriptive Review,” Frontiers in Pediatrics 10 (2022): 923125, 10.3389/fped.2022.923125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Logan S. A. E. and MacMahon E., “Viral Meningitis,” BMJ 336, no. 7634 (2008): 36–40, 10.1136/bmj.39409.673657.AE. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Jmor F., Emsley H. C., Fischer M., et al., “The Incidence of Acute Encephalitis Syndrome in Western Industrialized and Tropical Countries,” Virology Journal 5, no. 1 (2008): 134, 10.1186/1743-422X-5-134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. de Blauw D., Bruning A. H. L., Busch C. B. E., et al., “Epidemiology and Etiology of Severe Childhood Encephalitis in The Netherlands,” Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 39, no. 4 (2020): 267–272, 10.1097/INF.0000000000002551.. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Antona D., Kossorotoff M., Schuffenecker I., et al., “Severe Paediatric Conditions Linked With EV‐A71 and EV‐D68, France, May to October 2016,” Eurosurveill 21, no. 46 (2016): 30402, 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.46.30402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Karrasch M., Fischer E., Scholten M., et al., “A Severe Pediatric Infection With a Novel Enterovirus A71 Strain, Thuringia, Germany,” Journal of Clinical Virology 84 (2016): 90–95, 10.1016/j.jcv.2016.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Böttcher S., Obermeier P. E., Neubauer K., and Diedrich S., “Recombinant Enterovirus A71 Subgenogroup C1 Strains, Germany, 2015,” Emerging Infectious Diseases 22, no. 10 (2016): 1843–1846, 10.3201/eid2210.160357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. González‐Sanz R., Casas‐Alba D., Launes C., et al., “Molecular Epidemiology of an Enterovirus A71 Outbreak Associated With Severe Neurological Disease, Spain, 2016,” Eurosurveill 24, no. 7 (2019): 1800089, 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.7.1800089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Casas‐Alba D., de Sevilla M. F., Valero‐Rello A., et al., “Outbreak of Brainstem Encephalitis Associated With Enterovirus‐A71 in Catalonia, Spain (2016): A Clinical Observational Study in a Children's Reference Centre in Catalonia,” Clinical Microbiology and Infection 23, no. 11 (2017): 874–881, 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Riccardi N., Antonello R. M., Luzzati R., Zajkowska J., di Bella S., and Giacobbe D. R., “Tick‐Borne Encephalitis in Europe: A Brief Update on Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment,” European Journal of Internal Medicine 62 (2019): 1–6, 10.1016/j.ejim.2019.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. World Health Organization , ed., ICD‐10: International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems: Tenth Revision, 2nd Ed (World Health Organization, 2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Rahardja D., “Statistical Time‐Series Forecast via Microsoft Excel (FORECAST.ETS) Built‐In Function,” Journal of Research in Applied Mathematics 7, no. 11 (2021): 69–73. [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Boucher A., Herrmann J. L., Morand P., et al., “Epidemiology of Infectious Encephalitis Causes in 2016,” Médecine et Maladies Infectieuses 47 (2017): 221–235, 10.1016/j.medmal.2017.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Launes C., Casas‐Alba D., Fortuny C., et al., “Utility of FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel During Outbreak of Brainstem Encephalitis Caused by Enterovirus in Catalonia in 2016,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology 55, no. 1 (2016): 336–338, 10.1128/JCM.01931-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Cuesta G., Puerta‐Alcalde P., Vergara A., et al., “An Assessment of a New Rapid Multiplex PCR Assay for the Diagnosis of Meningoencephalitis,” Diagnostics (Basel) 14, no. 8 (2024): 802, 10.3390/diagnostics14080802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Wilson M. R., Sample H. A., Zorn K. C., et al., “Clinical Metagenomic Sequencing for Diagnosis of Meningitis and Encephalitis,” New England Journal of Medicine 380, no. 24 (2019): 2327–2340, 10.1056/NEJMoa1803396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Launes C., Camacho J., Pons‐Espinal M., et al., “Hybrid Capture Shotgun Sequencing Detected Unexpected Viruses in the Cerebrospinal Fluid of Children With Acute Meningitis and Encephalitis,” European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 43, no. 5 (2024): 863–873, 10.1007/s10096-024-04795-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Martin N. G., Iro M. A., Sadarangani M., Goldacre R., Pollard A. J., and Goldacre M. J., “Hospital Admissions for Viral Meningitis in Children in England Over Five Decades: A Population‐Based Observational Study,” Lancet Infectious Diseases 16, no. 11 (2016): 1279–1287, 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30201-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Kadambari S., Abdullahi F., Celma C., and Ladhani S., “Epidemiological Trends in Viral Meningitis in England: Prospective National Surveillance, 2013‐2023,” Journal of Infection 89, no. 3 (2024): 106223, 10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Britton P. N., Khoury L., Booy R., et al., “Encephalitis in Australian Children: Contemporary Trends in Hospitalization,” Archives of Disease in Childhood 101, no. 1 (2016): 51–56, 10.1136/archdischild-2015-308468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. George B. P., Schneider E. B., and Venkatesan A., “Encephalitis Hospitalization Rates and Inpatient Mortality in the United States, 2000‐2010,” PLoS One 9, no. 9 (2014): e104169, 10.1371/journal.pone.0104169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Wang H., Zhao S., Wang S., et al., “Global Magnitude of Encephalitis Burden and Its Evolving Pattern Over the Past 30 Years,” Journal of Infection 84, no. 6 (2022): 777–787, 10.1016/j.jinf.2022.04.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Rudolph H., Porto L., and Tenenbaum T., “Severe Courses of Meningitis and Encephalitis in Children and Adolescents,” Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde 170, no. 11 (2022): 986–996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Olivé‐Cirera G., Bruijstens A. L., Fonseca E. G., et al., “MOG Antibodies Restricted to CSF in Children With Inflammatory CNS Disorders,” Neurology 102, no. 7 (2024): e209199, 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Puenpa J., Wanlapakorn N., Vongpunsawad S., and Poovorawan Y., “The History of Enterovirus A71 Outbreaks and Molecular Epidemiology in the Asia‐Pacific Region,” Journal of Biomedical Science 26, no. 1 (2019): 75, 10.1186/s12929-019-0573-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Brueggemann A. B., Jansen van Rensburg M. J., Shaw D., et al., “Changes in the Incidence of Invasive Disease due to Streptococcus pneumoniae , Haemophilus Influenzae, and Neisseria meningitidis During the COVID‐19 Pandemic in 26 Countries and Territories in the Invasive Respiratory Infection Surveillance Initiative: A Prospective Analysis of Surveillance Data. Lancet Digital,” Health 3, no. 6 (2021): e360–e370, 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00077-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Cong B., Koç U., Bandeira T., et al., “Changes in the Global Hospitalization Burden of Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Young Children During the COVID‐19 Pandemic: A Systematic Analysis,” Lancet Infectious Diseases 24, no. 4 (2024): 361–374, 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00630-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES