Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2025 Jul 28;16(31):7875–7882. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5c01542

Long-Range Allosteric Modulation of DNA Duplex Dynamics Induced by Pyrrole-Imidazole Polyamide Binding

Sophie E T Kendall-Price , Ryan J O Nichol , Andrea Taladriz-Sender , Ryan Phelps §, Partha Malakar §, Gregory M Greetham §, Glenn A Burley ‡,*, Neil T Hunt †,*
PMCID: PMC12337142  PMID: 40720540

Abstract

The allosteric modulation of the structural dynamics of double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) duplexes as a function of distance from the site of a minor groove binding ligand is reported. Time-resolved temperature-jump infrared spectroscopy is used to interrogate the impact of binding a pyrrole-imidazole polyamide to dsDNA sequences 8–14 base-pairs in length. Our results demonstrate that the binding of the hairpin polyamide to its target site (5′-WWGTACW-3′; W = A/T) causes a marked suppression of structural dynamics, such as end fraying, with suppression observed in both the 3′ and 5′ directions. Quantitative analysis of end fraying suppression reveals a propagation length for dynamic modulation of 30 base-pairs. Identifying the structural impact of minor groove binding to dsDNA sequences furthers our understanding of the influence of dsDNA recognition and informs the design of next-generation synthetic transcription factors.


graphic file with name jz5c01542_0008.jpg


graphic file with name jz5c01542_0007.jpg


Sequence selective recognition of double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) is essential for transcriptional initiation. In many cases, recruitment of more than one DNA binding protein to a dsDNA sequence is required and evidence of cooperative protein binding at remote sites, mediated by allosteric interactions, underpins many aspects of transcriptional regulatory processes. While binding to dsDNA can result in structural changes leading to local allosteric modulation effects, longer range examples of allostery can occur without a corresponding conformational change in duplex structure. Although the mechanism for this remains unclear, it has been suggested that ligand-induced changes to the dynamics of dsDNA may underpin such allosteric communication mechanisms. This topic has been discussed in detail elsewhere.

To shed light on this, we report the impact upon dsDNA duplex structural dynamics arising from the recognition of a target sequence by a pyrrole–imidazole polyamide (PA). PAs modulate transcription both in vitro and in vivo by virtue of their programmable, sequence-selective, binding. When in complex with dsDNA, PAs can adopt a hairpin conformation in which pyrrole–pyrrole (Py-Py) pairings recognize A/T sequences (W), whereas pyrrole-imidazole (Py-Im) units recognize C-G sequences with Im-Py units recognizing G-C (Figure (a,b)). Upon minor groove binding, PAs induce local allosteric compression of the major groove on the opposite face of the binding site, while concomitantly widening the minor groove. Here, we investigate whether PA binding also gives rise to additional allosteric disruption at remote locations on dsDNA.

1.

1

(a) Schematic diagram showing nomenclature used to describe the interaction of dsDNA with PA1. (b) Diagram of the binding interaction of PA1 (black) with dsDNA (blue). (c) Table showing the oligodeoxyribonucleotide (ODN) sequences studied and abbreviations used in the text. Boldfaced letters correspond to the binding site of PA1.

The inherent challenge in such a study lies in the fact that DNA duplexes are dynamic over a wide range of time and length scales, which enables the propagation of local conformational changes throughout the duplex. Of the spectroscopic methods used to explore dsDNA dynamics, temperature (T)-jump time-resolved infrared (IR) spectroscopy has emerged as a powerful tool to gain insight into structural changes following ultrafast (ns) thermal perturbation with base-pair resolution. ,− In particular, T-jump IR probing of the recognition of dsDNA sequences by small molecules revealed that melting dynamics are slowed by a factor of 8 upon ligand binding. Minor groove ligand binding to dsDNA also reduced end-fraying dynamics of base-pairs adjacent to the binding site. In this context, end fraying serves as a good proxy for measuring remote changes in the dynamic behavior of the double helix caused by ligand binding, but strand separation is also a fundamental element of transcription and replication. At present, however, a quantitative experimental understanding of the distance dependence of the impact of binding upon the double helix is required to benchmark models of DNA dynamics and guide ligand design processes. ,

Our approach used a series of dsDNA oligodeoxyribonucleotide (ODN) sequences (8-ODN to 14-ODN, Figure (c)) that incorporate a core PA1 (Figure ) binding site 5′-ATGTACAC-3′ (underlined) extended by successive additions of A-T base-pairs in the 3′ direction up to a maximum of 14 base-pairs (Figure (c)). Our results show that the minor groove ligand PA1 suppresses end-fraying dynamics and delays double-strand melting. Quantitative analysis of the sequence length dependence of the end fraying suppression revealed that the allosteric effect follows an exponential distance profile with a propagation length of some 30 base-pairs, showing that the PA ligand has a considerable effect on the long-range dynamics of dsDNA.

PA•DNA complexes were formed by titration of PA1 into a solution of dsDNA. Monitoring by 1H NMR spectroscopy ensured formation of a 1:1 complex (for PA1 preparation, characterization and complex formation, see Supporting Information Scheme S1, Figures S1–S9 and Table S1). IR absorption spectra were measured using a Bruker Vertex 70 Fourier transform (FT)-IR spectrometer. T-jump IR spectroscopy was performed using a ns-duration T-jump pump pulse tuned to the O–D stretching vibration of the D2O solvent to deliver a 12 K increase in temperature. A time-delayed IR probe pulse resonant with the base vibrational modes of DNA was used to monitor the subsequent temporal evolution of the system. Full details of sample preparation and spectroscopy experiments are provided in the Supporting Information.

Melting curves for the series of ODNs with and without PA1 bound were obtained from temperature-dependent FTIR spectra by plotting the absorbance of the band due to the guanine ring (GR) vibrational mode at 1575 cm–1 as a function of temperature (Figure (a,b), Figure S10). The GR band increases in intensity upon dsDNA melting, primarily due to loss of base stacking. ,,

2.

2

Melting curves derived from the change in absorbance of the GR (orange) and AR (purple) bands of 8-ODN (a) and 14-ODN (b) as a function of ΔTT = T 0T m, where T 0 is the equilibrium temperature of an IR absorption measurement or the starting temperature of a T-jump measurement and T m is the melting temperature). All data sets are normalized to the results of fitting the experimental data with a two-state sigmoidal function show the fraction of melting. More detail is given in the Supporting Information (Figure S10). Asterisk marks the initial temperature for the spectra in Figure . T-jump IR spectra of 8-ODN (c) and 14-ODN (d) obtained as a function of T-jump pump–probe delay time from 2 ns (blue) to 100 μs (red), at ΔT = 0 °C (see text). ΔAbs is given in units of optical density (O.D.) which are equivalent to absorbance units. Colored bands highlight the position of the GR (orange) and AR (purple) bands. Difference FTIR spectra representing the effect of an increase in temperature of 10 °C on 8-ODN (e) and 14-ODN (f) as a function of ΔT.

Binding of PA1 increased the melting temperature (T m) of the complexes by 27–33 °C relative to the unbound n-ODN. Since each complex has a different T m (Table S2), subsequent data is presented as a function of ΔT = T 0T m, where T 0 is the equilibrium temperature of an IR absorption measurement or the starting temperature of a T-jump measurement.

T-jump-IR experiments performed on 8- and 14-ODN near T mT = 0 °C: Figure (c,d)) showed a characteristic band pattern associated with dsDNA melting. ,,, The data are presented as T-jump pumpon – pumpoff difference spectra so that positive features indicate bands that increased in intensity following the T-jump and vice versa. In addition to changes in the 1650–1700 cm–1 region, which contains contributions from a number of overlapping base vibrational modes, bands at 1575 and 1625 cm–1 were observed to increase in intensity (Figure (c,d), orange and purple bars). The former band arises from the GR mode, while the latter is assigned to an equivalent mode of adenine (AR), which also increases in intensity upon dsDNA melting. The absorbances of these bands provide a quantitative measure of dsDNA disruption and continue to rise until a T-jump pump–probe delay time of around 25 μs before decaying to the baseline as the sample cools on ms-time scales (Figures S11 and S12). Comparison of the T-jump spectra with FTIR difference spectra mimicking a similar rise in temperature (Figure (e,f)) show a near identical band profile, confirming assignment of the spectral changes to dsDNA melting.

Examining the temporal profile of the increase in intensity of the AR mode following the T-jump showed it to be well-represented by a triexponential function producing three time scales in the regions τ1: 10–20 ns, τ2: 100–200 ns and τ3: 4–5 μs (Figure (a)). These observations are in line with previous studies of dsDNA melting, allowing assignment of the time scales to the initial thermal response of the sample, end-fraying and duplex melting, respectively. ,− ,,

3.

3

(a) T-jump dynamics of the AR band of 14-ODN as a function of ΔT (points) along with the results of triexponential fitting as described in the text. The lifetimes indicated are for the initial thermal response (τ1), end-fraying (τ2) and melting (τ3). T-jump IR difference spectra of 8-ODN (b) and 14-ODN (c) obtained as a function of T-jump pump–probe delay time from 2 to 500 ns, at ΔT = −30 °C. Equilibrium difference IR absorption spectra (d) representing a jump in temperature of 10 °C at ΔT = −30 °C for 8-ODN (black) and 14-ODN (green).

To focus on the near-equilibrium dynamics of the helix, which are most relevant to the question of allosteric communication, T-jump IR difference spectra were obtained at an initial temperature far from the melting transition (Figure (b,c)). At ΔT = −30 °C, increases in AR mode (purple) intensity were observed for both 8-ODN (Figure (b)) and 14-ODN (Figure (c)) sequences, but with no accompanying change in the GR mode (orange). The lack of change in the GR mode is consistent with no duplex melting occurring this far from T m (Figure (a,b)). This is due to the location of the majority of the G-C base-pairs in the center of the dsDNA sequences and the relative resistance of terminal G-C pairs to end fraying as a result of the need to break three H-bonds. The observed change in the AR mode intensity at this ΔT is therefore assigned to perturbation of the A-T base-pairs, including end-fraying at the 5′ end of 8-ODN and at both the 3′- and 5′-ends of 14-ODN. The results are in good agreement with difference FTIR spectra obtained over a similar temperature range (Figure (d)), while the time scales of the changes in the AR band, which occur around ∼100–200 ns (Figure (a)) are also consistent with previous observations of end-fraying. ,,,, Fitting the temporal dynamics as a function of T 0 allowed an Eyring analysis to be performed (Figure S13, Table S3), producing an activation enthalpy of 18–25 kJ mol–1, approximately equivalent to the loss of two hydrogen bonds, as would be expected for an A-T base-pair. ,

Comparing the end fraying behavior of 8- and 14-ODN (Figure ), it is noticeable that the increase in the AR mode of 14-ODN is greater than that observed for 8-ODN. Given that there are different numbers of base-pairs in these two sequences, it is important to consider these changes quantitatively by comparing them to the overall increase in the AR band intensity that occurs upon full melting of the respective dsDNA structure, which is available from the FTIR spectrum (Figure ). In the case of 14-ODN, at a temperature of ΔT = −20 °C, the approximate end point for a T-jump beginning at ΔT = −30 °C, the FTIR-derived AR band intensity is 17% of the maximum melting signal, with an increase of ∼9% occurring over the 10 °C window. As there are 11 A-T base-pairs in the 14-ODN sequence (Figure ), this equates to the equivalent of approximately two base-pairs per dsDNA having frayed by ΔT = −20 °C. In the case of 8-ODN, the increase between ΔT = −30 °C and ΔT = −20 °C is around 4% of the total, with the equivalent of 5% of A-T pairs having frayed by ΔT = −20 °C. This equates to less than one base-pair per duplex over the ensemble (Table S4). Overall, this shows that 14-ODN is more prone to end-fraying than 8-ODN.

Considering end-fraying as a function of ΔT for 8- and 14-ODN (Figure , red bars) reveals a similar pattern, with 14-ODN giving rise to a greater absolute change in the intensity of the AR band than 8-ODN at all values of ΔT. However, for a given sequence, the contribution to the AR band amplitude assigned to end fraying (that occurring between 2 and 100 ns, red bars), remains approximately constant with ΔT. This is in contrast to the contribution to the AR band intensity occurring between 100 ns to 10 μs (blue bars), which is due to duplex melting. The latter increases dramatically as T m is approached in line with the sigmoidal melting behavior of the sequence. This is consistent with previous observations showing that the fluctuations of the strand leading to end-fraying are separable from the melting behavior.

4.

4

Comparison of the measured increases in AR band absorbance as a function of ΔT for the T-jump IR experiments of 8-ODN (a) and 14-ODN (b) between 2 and 100 ns (red) and between 100 ns and 10 μs (blue).

Extending the study to include the 10- and 12-ODN sequences shows intermediate behavior relative to 8- and 14-ODN in terms of the magnitude of the changes in the AR band due to end fraying. The equivalent data for these sequences are shown in Figures S14 and 15 and Table S4.

Having established the dynamic behavior of free duplexes we progress to comparisons with data obtained on n-ODN•PA1 complexes to establish the dynamic impact of ligand binding. The results of T-jump spectroscopy measurements on 8-ODN•PA1 and 14-ODN•PA1 are shown in Figure alongside the equivalent data for the ODN in the absence of PA1.

5.

5

T-jump IR spectra of 8-ODN (a and b), 8-ODN•PA1 (c and d), 14-ODN (e and f), 14-ODN•PA1 (g and h) obtained as a function of T-jump-probe delay time from 2 ns to 10 μs. Spectra were obtained at ΔT values of −30 °C (a and c), −15 °C (b, d, f and h) and −45 °C (e and g).

At large negative ΔT values, far from the melting temperature, we observe the characteristic AR band appearing within 100 ns of the T-jump pulse in both 8- and 14-ODN (Figure (a,e), purple), indicative of end-fraying. In the presence of the ligand, however, no equivalent band is present in the data obtained for 8-ODN•PA1 (Figure (c)). Indeed, the only signal observed across all pump–probe delay times is a negative peak at 1670 cm–1. This corresponds to the ν­(CO), carboxylate stretching mode of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), which is present in trace amounts in all of the complexes as a result of its use in the purification process of PA1. This situation remained unchanged upon altering ΔT to −15 °C, closer to T m (Figure (d)).

Comparing the T-jump data from 8-ODN•PA1 to the FTIR spectrum obtained under equilibrium conditions reveals a small increase in the AR mode and a larger increase in the GR mode in the latter (Figure S16). This shows that a small amount of melting does occur for 8-ODN•PA1 at this temperature on a longer time scale, which is not captured in the T-jump data. Furthermore, as T 0 was moved progressively closer to T m, contributions from the GR band appear in the T-jump-IR spectra of 8-ODN at later T-jump-probe times (Figure (b), orange), but were not observed for the complex (Figure (d)). Taken together, the lack of contribution to the T-jump-IR spectra from the AR and GR modes of 8-ODN•PA1 across all T-jump-probe delays suggests that binding of PA1 has significantly suppressed both the fast dynamics of 8-ODN, reaching up to two base-pairs from the binding site, and delayed the melting behavior. These observations match those made using the Hoechst 33258 dye in different dsDNA sequences. ,

It is interesting to note that, in addition to end-fraying and melting, there was also a lack of spectroscopic response of 8-ODN•PA1 compared to 8-ODN at short pump–probe delay times between 10 and 50 ns (Figure (a–d), blue). On these time scales, changes appear in the free dsDNA spectrum at 1625 and 1660 cm–1, which are assigned to base vibrational modes of dsDNA responding to the initial change in temperature caused by the T-jump pulse. That no similar signature is observed for 8-ODN•PA1 is attributed to the location of the PA1 ligand (K d = 254 pM) in the minor groove of dsDNA. The strongly bound ligand displaces the solvating water backbone found in this groove and we hypothesize that the change in solvation environment restricts the response of the DNA vibrational modes. , By contrast, the TFA contaminant is not bound to the complex and so reports the change in temperature through a shift in its carboxyl stretching vibrational mode (1670 cm–1) upon rapid heating.

Upon increasing the length of the dsDNA sequence, a response from the AR mode was observed in the T-jump spectra of 14-ODN•PA1 at large, negative values of ΔT (Figure (g)), in contrast to observations from 8-ODN•PA1. Although this appears similar to observations made on the unbound 14-ODN duplex (Figure (e)), comparing the absolute values to the equilibrium IR data shows that, for 14-ODN, the change in absorbance of the AR band in the T-jump data at a delay time of 100 ns is equivalent to 44% of the change in absorbance observed under equilibrium conditions. For 14-ODN•PA1, this proportion is just 13%, indicative of PA1 binding to 14-ODN decreasing end-fraying by two-thirds. The melting dynamics are also affected upon ligand binding as the growth of the GR absorbance occurs at later times in 14-ODN•PA1 compared to 14-ODN (Figure S17). Therefore, the presence of the PA1 ligand also alters the fast dynamics of 14-ODN at large ΔT values, although to a lesser degree than for 8-ODN. Taken collectively, this data shows that the suppressive effect of minor groove recognition by PA1 propagates to the end of the 14-mer sequence. The reduction of the dynamic suppression effect at the end of the 14-ODN sequence compared to that observed for 8-ODN is consistent with a general reduction in the allosteric effect with distance, as proposed by models. ,,

Unlike the 8-ODN•PA1 complex, an AR mode response is observed for 14-ODN•PA1 even at the shortest of T-jump-probe delay times (Figure (g)). This is consistent with our earlier hypothesis in that, as the sequence length increases, water can now occupy the minor groove in the section of the dsDNA located away from the binding site, solvating the A-T nucleobases. , The resulting change in solvation leads to the small response of the AR mode seen at early delay times. We note that the spectral position of this thermal response occurs at a slightly lower wavenumber than the end fraying response, as would be expected for two different processes. This observation is more apparent at smaller negative values of ΔT. Specifically, for 14-ODN, the magnitude of the AR band increases as ΔT is changed to −15 °C (Figure (f)), but for 14-ODN•PA1 (Figure (h)) the signal in the AR region consists of a sharp positive and negative peak at early pump–probe delays (2–50 ns) that evolves into a single, broader, peak with time. This spectral evolution is assigned to the effect of two competing line shapes described above: the “positive–negative” heating response caused by a shift in the AR band due to heating-induced modification of the solvation environment of dsDNA, which is replaced by the Gaussian AR mode centered at 1625 cm–1 due to end fraying. Due to its size, the heating response masks the actual change in absorbance of the AR band due to end-fraying at ΔT = −15 °C while also causing a small offset of the AR peak center in the complex.

Reconciling the aforementioned results with analysis of the 10- and 12-ODN sequences (Figures S18 and S19, Table S5) allows evaluation of the impact of PA1 binding as a function of dsDNA length. Figure shows the degree of end-fraying (defined as ΔAbs­(AR) at 100 ns/ΔAbs­(AR) under equilibrium conditions) for each sequence length and the respective PA1 complex at ΔT = −40 °C. As expected, increasing the DNA sequence length results in an increase in the degree of end-fraying in free DNA. This is also true for the n-ODN•PA1 complexes, although the trend is flatter such that we can infer that there is a large difference between dsDNA and dsDNA•PA for all sequence lengths. It has previously been shown that the finite propagation length of allosteric binding along DNA, ξ, can be estimated from the decrease in the change in absorbance of a vibrational mode upon ligand binding. Examining the decrease in the degree of end-fraying with sequence length, which is given by the percentage reduction in the degree of end-fraying for a given sequence due to the presence of PA1 (Figure , red symbols), shows that the suppressive effect of PA1 on end-fraying is greater closer to the binding site. Fitting to a single exponential function produces an allosteric propagation length of 32 base-pairs (Equation S1 and Figure S20). Thus, PA1 binding to target binding sites across all of the dsDNA sequences explored in this study results in suppression of the fast dynamics of dsDNA, the degree of which decreases exponentially with sequence length. For completeness, measurements on a 14-mer dsDNA sequence with the AT base-pairs added to the 5′ direction relative to the binding site and its PA1 complex were also performed (Figure S21), showing that suppression of end-fraying by PA1 occurs equally in both the 5′ and 3′ directions.

6.

6

Degree of end-fraying for n-ODN sequences and n-ODN•PA1 complexes obtained from comparisons of the AR mode intensity obtained via T-jump spectroscopy at 100 ns and ΔT = −40 °C to those obtained from FTIR. Expressing the change in the degree of end-fraying upon binding PA1 as a percentage gives the degree of suppression with sequence length.

The observed dynamic suppression is notably larger in comparison to another minor groove binder Hoechst 33258, which produced an estimated allosteric propagation length of 5 base-pairs. The two systems differ considerably in the size and shape of the ligand and this aspect would benefit from further study. , From a biological perspective, our results show that the allosteric effect of PA binding could influence interactions many base pairs along the dsDNA sequence. More specifically, the androgen response element, on which the binding site used in this study is modeled, features a second GWWC binding site just 5 base-pairs away and which would be within reach of the dynamic effect arising from binding.

In conclusion, we have demonstrated that dsDNA recognition by a minor groove binding PA allosterically influences the long-range dsDNA dynamics, suppressing both end-fraying and double-strand melting. This effect persists in a manner consistent with a propagation length of 30 base-pairs and highlights a potential mechanism for remote communication between binding sites which could be exploited when designing synthetic ligands to modulate transcription.

Supplementary Material

jz5c01542_si_001.pdf (2.5MB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

S.E.T.K-P, R.J.O.N., G.A.B. and N.T.H. gratefully acknowledge funding for this work from the Leverhulme Trust (RPG-2022-045). Funding for access to the STFC Central Laser Facility is also acknowledged.

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5c01542.

  • Sample preparation and additional experimental details; additional spectroscopic data: temperature-dependent FT-IR melting curves of all samples, T-jump dynamics for all samples (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Kim S., Broströmer E., Xing D., Jin J., Chong S., Ge H., Wang S., Gu C., Yang L., Gao Y. Q., Su X. D., Sun Y., Xie X. S.. Probing Allostery through DNA. Science. 2013;339(6121):816–819. doi: 10.1126/science.1229223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Rosenblum G., Elad N., Rozenberg H., Wiggers F., Jungwirth J., Hofmann H.. Allostery through DNA Drives Phenotype Switching. Nat. Commun. 2021;12(1):2967. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23148-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Segers M., Voorspoels A., Sakaue T., Carlon E.. Mechanisms of DNA-Mediated Allostery. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2023;131(23):238402. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.238402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dršata T., Zgarbová M., Špačková N., Jurečka P., Šponer J., Lankaš F.. Mechanical Model of DNA Allostery. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014;5(21):3831–3835. doi: 10.1021/jz501826q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Moretti R., Donato L. J., Brezinski M. L., Stafford R. L., Hoff H., Thorson J. S., Dervan P. B., Ansari A. Z.. Targeted Chemical Wedges Reveal the Role of Allosteric DNA Modulation in Protein - DNA Assembly. ACS Chem. Biol. 2008;3(4):220–229. doi: 10.1021/cb700258r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fechter E. J., Dervan P. B.. Allosteric Inhibition of Protein-DNA Complexes by Polyamide-Intercalator Conjugates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125(28):8476–8485. doi: 10.1021/ja030125e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McLeish T. C. B., Rodgers T. L., Wilson M. R.. Allostery without Conformation Change: Modelling Protein Dynamics at Multiple Scales. Phys. Biol. 2013;10(5):056004. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/10/5/056004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wyman J. Jr., Allen D. W.. The Problem of the Heme Interactions in Hemoglobin and the Basis of the Bohr Effect. J. Polym. Sci. 1951;7(5):499–518. doi: 10.1002/pol.1951.120070506. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cooper A., Dryden D. T. F.. Allostery without Conformational Change. Eur. Biophys. J. 1984;11(2):103–109. doi: 10.1007/BF00276625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hofmann H.. All over or Overall - Do We Understand Allostery? Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2023;83:102724. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hiraoka K., Inoue T., Taylor R. D., Watanabe T., Koshikawa N., Yoda H., Shinohara K., Takatori A., Sugimoto H., Maru Y., Denda T., Fujiwara K., Balmain A., Ozaki T., Bando T., Sugiyama H., Nagase H.. Inhibition of KRAS Codon 12 Mutants Using a Novel DNA-Alkylating Pyrrole-Imidazole Polyamide Conjugate. Nat. Commun. 2015;6(1):6706. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chenoweth D. M., Harki D. A., Phillips J. W., Dose C., Dervan P. B.. Cyclic Pyrrole-Imidazole Polyamides Targeted to the Androgen Response Element. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131(20):7182–7188. doi: 10.1021/ja901309z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nickols N. G., Jacobs C. S., Farkas M. E., Dervan P. B.. Improved Nuclear Localization of DNA-Binding Polyamides. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(2):363–370. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl1042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Yang F., Nickols N. G., Li B. C., Marinov G. K., Said J. W., Dervan P. B.. Antitumor Activity of a Pyrrole-Imidazole Polyamide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013;110(5):1863–1868. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1222035110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Erwin G. S., Grieshop M. P., Ali A., Qi J., Lawlor M., Kumar D., Ahmad I., McNally A., Teider N., Worringer K., Sivasankaran R., Syed D. N., Eguchi A., Ashraf Md., Jeffery J., Xu M., Park P. M. C., Mukhtar H., Srivastava A. K., Faruq M., Bradner J. E., Ansari A. Z.. Synthetic Transcription Elongation Factors License Transcription across Repressive Chromatin. Science. 2017;358(6370):1617–1622. doi: 10.1126/science.aan6414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Vaijayanthi T., Pandian G. N., Sugiyama H.. Pyrrole-Imidazole Polyamides - A Frontrunner in Nucleic Acid-Based Small Molecule Drugs. Adv. Ther. 2023;6(7):2300022. doi: 10.1002/adtp.202300022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Leijon M., Leroy J. L.. Internal Motions of Nucleic Acid Structures and the Determination of Base-Pair Lifetimes. Biochimie. 1997;79(12):775–779. doi: 10.1016/S0300-9084(97)86936-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Nikolova E. N., Bascom G. D., Andricioaei I., Al-Hashimi H. M.. Probing Sequence-Specific DNA Flexibility in A-Tracts and Pyrimidine-Purine Steps by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance 13C Relaxation and Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Biochemistry. 2012;51(43):8654–8664. doi: 10.1021/bi3009517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sanstead P. J., Stevenson P., Tokmakoff A.. Sequence-Dependent Mechanism of DNA Oligonucleotide Dehybridization Resolved through Infrared Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016;138(36):11792–11801. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b05854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Grunwell J. R., Glass J. L., Lacoste T. D., Deniz A. A., Chemla D. S., Schultz P. G.. Monitoring the Conformational Fluctuations of DNA Hairpins Using Single-Pair Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001;123(18):4295–4303. doi: 10.1021/ja0027620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fritzsch R., Greetham G. M., Clark I. P., Minnes L., Towrie M., Parker A. W., Hunt N. T.. Monitoring Base-Specific Dynamics during Melting of DNA-Ligand Complexes Using Temperature-Jump Time-Resolved Infrared Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2019;123(29):6188–6199. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b04354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sanstead P. J., Tokmakoff A.. Direct Observation of Activated Kinetics and Downhill Dynamics in DNA Dehybridization. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2018;122(12):3088–3100. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b01445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Menssen R. J., Tokmakoff A.. Length-Dependent Melting Kinetics of Short DNA Oligonucleotides Using Temperature-Jump IR Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2019;123(4):756–767. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b09487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhang X.-X., Brantley S. L., Corcelli S. A., Tokmakoff A.. DNA Minor-Groove Binder Hoechst 33258 Destabilizes Base-Pairing Adjacent to Its Binding Site. Commun. Biol. 2020;3(1):525. doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-01241-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ashwood B., Jones M. S., Radakovic A., Khanna S., Lee Y., Sachleben J. R., Szostak J. W., Ferguson A. L., Tokmakoff A.. Thermodynamics and Kinetics of DNA and RNA Dinucleotide Hybridization to Gaps and Overhangs. Biophys. J. 2023;122(16):3323–3339. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2023.07.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Howe C. P., Greetham G. M., Procacci B., Parker A. W., Hunt N. T.. Measuring RNA UNCG Tetraloop Refolding Dynamics Using Temperature-Jump/Drop Infrared Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2022;13:9171–9176. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c02338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Dale J., Howe C. P., Toncrova H., Fritzsch R., Greetham G. M., Clark I. P., Towrie M., Parker A. W., McLeish T. C., Hunt N. T.. Combining Steady State and Temperature Jump IR Spectroscopy to Investigate the Allosteric Effects of Ligand Binding to dsDNA. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2021;23(28):15352–15363. doi: 10.1039/D1CP02233D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Greetham G. M., Clark I. P., Young B., Fritsch R., Minnes L., Hunt N. T., Towrie M.. Time-Resolved Temperature-Jump Infrared Spectroscopy at a High Repetition Rate. Appl. Spectrosc. 2020;74(6):720–727. doi: 10.1177/0003702820913636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Banyay M., Sarkar M., Gräslund A.. A Library of IR Bands of Nucleic Acids in Solution. Biophys. Chem. 2003;104(2):477–488. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4622(03)00035-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hithell G., Donaldson P. M., Greetham G. M., Towrie M., Parker A. W., Burley G. A., Hunt N. T.. Effect of Oligomer Length on Vibrational Coupling and Energy Relaxation in Double-Stranded DNA. Chem. Phys. 2018;512:154–164. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2017.12.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Menssen R. J., Tokmakoff A.. Length-Dependent Melting Kinetics of Short DNA Oligonucleotides Using Temperature-Jump IR Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2019;123(4):756–767. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b09487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Howe C. P., Greetham G. M., Procacci B., Parker A. W., Hunt N. T.. Sequence-Dependent Melting and Refolding Dynamics of RNA UNCG Tetraloops Using Temperature-Jump/Drop Infrared Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2023;127(7):1586–1597. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c08709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Privalov P. L., Crane-Robinson C.. Forces Maintaining the DNA Double Helix. Eur. Biophys. J. 2020;49(5):315–321. doi: 10.1007/s00249-020-01437-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Privalov P. L.. Physical Basis of the DNA Double Helix. J. Biophys. Struct. Biol. 2020;8(1):AEA730862925. doi: 10.5897/JBSB2019.0074. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Aman K., Padroni G., Parkinson J. A., Welte T., Burley G. A.. Structural and Kinetic Profiling of Allosteric Modulation of Duplex DNA Induced by DNA-Binding Polyamide Analogues. Chem. - Eur. J. 2019;25(11):2757–2763. doi: 10.1002/chem.201805338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Chuprina V. P., Heinemann U., Nurislamov A. A., Zielenkiewicz P., Dickerson R. E., Saenger W.. Molecular Dynamics Simulation of the Hydration Shell of a B-DNA Decamer Reveals Two Main Types of Minor-Groove Hydration Depending on Groove Width. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1991;88(2):593–597. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.2.593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Tereshko V., Minasov G., Egli M.. A “Hydrat-Ion” Spine in a B-DNA Minor Groove. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999;121(15):3590–3595. doi: 10.1021/ja984346+. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Singh J., Purohit P. K.. Elasticity as the Basis of Allostery in DNA. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2019;123(1):21–28. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b07501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Toncrova, H. Coarse-Grained Models of Biomolecule Dynamics and Allostery. PhD thesis, University of Leeds, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  40. Padroni G., Parkinson J. A., Fox K. R., Burley G. A.. Structural Basis of DNA Duplex Distortion Induced by Thiazole-Containing Hairpin Polyamides. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(1):42–53. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Chenoweth D. M., Dervan P. B.. Structural Basis for Cyclic Py-Im Polyamide Allosteric Inhibition of Nuclear Receptor Binding. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132(41):14521–14529. doi: 10.1021/ja105068b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

jz5c01542_si_001.pdf (2.5MB, pdf)

Articles from The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES