Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

bioRxiv logoLink to bioRxiv
[Preprint]. 2025 Jul 18:2025.07.16.665213. [Version 1] doi: 10.1101/2025.07.16.665213

Sustained Yap/Taz activation promotes aberrant alveolar epithelial cell differentiation and drives persistent fibrotic remodeling

Isabella P Gaona 1,+, A Scott McCall 1,2,+, Natalie M Geis 1, Arlo C Colvard 1, Gianluca T DiGiovanni 1, Taylor P Sherrill 1, Ujjal K Singha 1, David S Nichols 1, Anna P Serezani 1, Holly E David 1, Jean-Philippe Cartailler 3, Shristi Shrestha 3, Sergey S Gutor 4, Timothy S Blackwell 4, Jonathan A Kropski 1,2,5,*, Jason J Gokey 1,*
PMCID: PMC12338630  PMID: 40791334

Abstract

YAP/TAZ signaling is required for initiation of lung alveolar repair, yet previous studies in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) predicted increased YAP/TAZ signaling in alveolar epithelial cells (AECs). We investigated whether persistent YAP/TAZ AEC signaling contributes to failed epithelial repair and persistent fibrotic remodeling. In IPF lungs, we identified increased YAP+/TAZ+ AECs and increased expression of YAP/TAZ transcriptional targets compared to donor control lungs. In human lung organoids, pharmacological YAP/TAZ activation resulted in phenotype shifts of AECs into aberrant transitional states. In mice with Yap/Taz activation (YTactive) resulting from deletion of Hippo-kinases Stk3/4 in alveolar-type 2 (AT2) cells, resulted in persistent fibrotic remodeling at 28- and 56-days post-bleomycin injury. Gene promoter activity associated with transitional cell markers (Krt19, Hopx, and Runx2) was increased in YTactive AT2 cells. Immunofluorescent staining showed a loss of AT2 associated Cebpa and increased Krt19 in YTactive lineage traced AT2 cells 28 days post-injury. Inhibition of Yap/Taz using Verteporfin resulted in improved lung repair in YTactive mouse lungs, including increased Cebpa and decreased Krt19+ transitional cells. These findings demonstrate sustained Yap/Taz activation drives abnormal alveolar repair and persistent fibrotic remodeling. Blocking aberrant persistent Yap/Taz activity promotes adaptive repair and has potential as a therapeutic strategy for PF.

Introduction:

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic and progressive lung disease characterized by the replacement of functional alveoli with dense fibrotic scarring1,2. This fibrotic remodeling is associated with loss of respiratory function and is often lethal within 3-5 years of diagnosis. The only 2 FDA approved treatment for IPF modestly slow loss of respiratory function, but do not stabilize disease or improve quality of life for IPF patients3-5. The cause of IPF is unknown, but evidence from genetic studies and mouse models indicate that repetitive injury to – and failed repair of - the alveolar epithelium is a driving factor of disease progression that leads to activation of the fibroblast6-10.

In the human and mouse lung alveolar epithelium, the alveolar type 2 (AT2) cells act as facultative progenitor cells during alveolar repair, proliferating to generate more AT2 cells and differentiating into alveolar type 1 (AT1) cells that lay in close proximity to the alveolar capillaries to facilitate gas exchange11-14. During “failed” alveolar repair, aberrant progenitor AT2 populations can form “hyperplastic AT2” regions or differentiate into persisting alveolar transitional cell populations expressing markers of both AT1/AT2 cells that do not adopt the long thin AT1 cell shape that is essential to facilitate gas exchange15-18. These abnormal repair processes that are believed to be an early driver of pulmonary fibrosis, thus understanding the mechanisms that drive normal “adaptive” repair versus those that lead to fibrotic remodeling is essential to develop treatments that will halt disease progression and/or restore lung function.

Several developmental pathways that are typically quiescent during lung homeostasis become transiently activated during normal repair, however persistent activation of these pathways is predicted to lead to aberrant injury responses15,16,19,20. Recent work has implicated the Hippo-Yap/Taz pathway being involved in AT2 to AT1 differentiation during development and repair21-23. The Hippo-Yap/Taz pathway consists of the Hippo components mammalian serine-threonine kinases 1/2 (MST1/2 in humans, Stk4/3 respectively in mouse) that phosphorylate Lats1/2 that in turn phosphorylate Yap and Taz. When this phosphorylation cascade is active, Yap and Taz are sequestered in the cytoplasm, however in the absence of phosphorylation Yap and/or Taz translocate to the nucleus where they interact with DNA binding partners24-26 (classically TEADs27-29 and also with Runx230,31 and Smads32-34) to direct transcription of target genes associated with proliferation and differentiation. Previous work from our group and others determined that activation of Yap/Taz signaling is required for alveolar repair, as deletion of Yap/Taz or just Taz in AT2 cells prevents AT1 cell differentiation35-38. Our previous work demonstrated nuclear Taz is expressed in nearly all AT1 cells, while nuclear Yap or Taz is rarely detected in AT2 cells at homeostasis. During injury repair, Yap and Taz are activated in AT2 cells, with peak activity at 7 and 14 days respectively, and are down-regulated to low activity by 21-28 days post-bleomycin injury35. These studies demonstrate that some degree of Yap/Taz activity is essential early during the repair process and preemptive inhibition of Yap/Taz would be maladaptive for the lung epithelium. In contrast, scRNA-sequencing and immunofluorescence data from our group and others have predicted that increased YAP/TAZ activity is associated with aberrant epithelial cells in the IPF lung as well as fibroblast activation37,39-45. This led us to hypothesize that aberrant and persistent Yap/Taz activation in AT2 cells prevents normal alveolar epithelial repair, results in persistent transitional cells, and promotes fibrotic remodeling in the lung. In these studies, we sought to define the role of sustained Yap/Yaz activity in AT2 cells during lung injury and subsequent fibrotic remodeling and test whether interrupting this persistent epithelial Yap/Taz activity would promote adaptive repair and block or delay IPF progression.

Results:

To determine whether YAP and/or TAZ is activated in the IPF lung epithelium, we first performed immunofluorescence staining to assess nuclear YAP or TAZ in SP-C+ (either marking AT2 cells in healthy donor/IPF or hyper/metaplastic alveolar epithelium in IPF) cells or AGER+ (labeling AT1 in healthy donor/IPF or aberrant epithelium in IPF) cells. De-identified donor and IPF subject (N=6 each) demographics are reported in supplemental Table S1. Consistent with our previous findings41, YAP was rarely detected in SP-C+ cells (5.8+/− 4.2%) of healthy donors, however YAP was present in the nucleus of 38.7% (+/− 6.3%) of SP-C+ cells including cells that were both SP-C+/AGER+ in IPF lungs (Figure 1A, C). TAZ was also rarely detected (2.1+/−2.4%) in healthy donor SP-C+ AT2 cells, however nuclear TAZ was present in 21.4% (+/− 7.3%) of SP-C+ and SP-C+/AGER+ cells in IPF lungs (Figure 1B, D). We then interrogated scRNA-seq data from our recently published work46,47, performing cell-type specific, subject-level pseudobulk differential expression analysis comparing IPF and control AT2 cells. We found that YAP and TAZ (WWTR1), YAP/TAZ binding partners (TEAD1/3, NFIB), and YAP/TAZ transcription targets were increased in IPF AT2 cells compared to control donor AT2 cells (Figure 1E). These findings support the concept that there is sustained activation of Hippo-YAP/TAZ signaling in IPF alveolar epithelium.

Figure 1. YAP and TAZ are active in the IPF epithelium.

Figure 1.

A) Immunofluorescence analysis of YAP (red) and (B) TAZ (red) in AGER+ (green) AT1 cells and SP-C+ (white) AT2 cells. C) Quantification of YAP+ nuclei and (D) TAZ+ nuclei in SP-C+ AT2 cells from donor and IPF lungs. n = 6 per group. Statistics determined using an unpaired parametric t-tests. E) Differential gene expression analysis of IPF AT2 cells generated from previously published scRNAseq analysis of IPF and donor lungs (GSE227136). Scale bar represents 50μm.

To test the consequences of sustained YAP/TAZ signaling in human alveolar epithelial cells, we isolated CD326+ epithelial cells from peripheral lung tissue obtained from declined lung donors and cultured them serum-free-feeder-free media as alveolar organoids48. Organoids were grown from day 1-7 in SFFFM media and then either continued in SFFFM until day 14 or switched to alveolar differentiation media from day 7-14 and were treated with either vehicle or the Yap/Taz activating drug XMU-MP1 (3μM), a specific MST1/2 inhibitor49, from culture day 4-14, in which we observed led to dramatic changes in organoid appearance (Figure 2A). We noted morphologic differences in culture and thus sought to characterize multiple subcellular components to quantify cellular morphologies. Whole-mount staining of RNA (SYTO 14) cytoskeletal components (Wheat Germ Agglutinin and Phalloidin) dyes followed by high-content imaging and analysis were used50. We found that activation of YAP/TAZ with XMU-MP1 resulted in marked and over-riding morphologic changes of these human AT2 cell organoids whether cultured in SFFFM or commercial ADM (alveolar differentiation media) which drove unique morphologic appearance (ADM resulting in a splayed appearance) (Figure 2B). Analysis of vehicle and XMU treated organoids revealed cell morphology changes in the YAP/TAZ activated organoids as demonstrated by visualizing the variance in cell shape in phenotypic PCA space derived from all extracted morphologic features with significant shifts between SFFFM, ADM, or XMU treated organoids51 (Figure 2C). Likewise, analysis of cell nuclei morphology in phenotypic space incorporating RNA nuclear localization revealed significantly altered nuclear features in YAP/TAZ activated organoids which is consistent with prior YAP/TAZ activation phenotypes observed in mechanical situations44,52-54 (Figure 2D). We then further characterized these organoids using immunofluorescent staining and scRNA sequencing. Collected organoids were stained for AGER and SP-C which demonstrated that YAP/TAZ activation increased the expression of AGER especially in SFFFM organoids (Figure 3A). Analysis of scRNA data indicated that sustained activation of YAP/TAZ signaling resulted in the aberrant differentiation of AT2 cells into several sub-populations including a YAP/TAZ-active aberrant population expressing high levels of the mitochondrial marker TOMM20 and a YAP/TAZ-active population expressing high levels of keratins (KRThi) associated with aberrant transitional cell populations (Figure 3B, C). These aberrant populations were present in XMU-MP1 treated cultures regardless of the presence of SFFFM or ADM culture media (Figure 3D, E), indicating that sustained activation of YAP/TAZ in human epithelial cells results in abnormal alveolar cell behavior and differentiation into aberrant cell populations which supersedes signaling provided by media with either AT2 or components of alveolar differentiation.

Figure 2. YAP/TAZ activation alters cell morphology in human organoids.

Figure 2.

A) Schematic of human epithelial organoid generation, YAP/TAZ activation (XMU-MP-1), and collection strategy. B) Cell and nuclei shape analysis using WGA (yellow) and Phalloidin (orange) with SYTO14 (cyan) in organoids treated with Vehicle or XMU-MP1 in either SFFFM or ADM. C) Organoid morphologic analysis across phenotypic PCA space based on analysis of high-dimensional feature extraction and statistical analysis of phenotypic between groups. Each point represents wells as technical replicates D) Analysis of cell nuclei across phenotypic PCA space and phenotypic distance between groups. Each point represents wells as technical replicates. P values adjusted for multiple comparisons. Scale bars represent 50μm.

Figure 3. YAP/TAZ activation leads to aberrant epithelial cell populations in human alveolar organoids.

Figure 3.

A) Immunofluorescence analysis of AGER+ cells and SP-C+ cells in organoids treated with 3μM XMU-MP-1 or DMSO in expansion (SFFFM) and differentiation (ADM) media. B-C) UMAP embedding of jointly analyses scRNA-seq of YAP/TAZ activated and DMSO control organoids annotated by treatment condition (B) or cell type/state (C). D) Quantification of percentages of normal and aberrant cell populations. E) Dot plot depicting marker gene expression in normal and aberrant cell populations. Scale bars are 50μm.

Next, to test the impact of AT2-cell Yap/Taz activation on experimental lung fibrosis in-vivo, we turned to a mouse model of conditional Yap/Taz activation in AT2 cells. In these mice, Hippo-kinase floxed mice (Stk3fl/fl/4fl/fl) were crossed with SftpcCreert2tdTomato mice, and Cre+ Yap/Taz active mice (hereafter referred to as YTactive mice) and Cre littermate controls or SftpcCreert2tdTomato WT mice were administered tamoxifen (100mg/kg intraperitoneal) 3-weeks prior to a single intratracheal dose of saline or 0.08IU bleomycin. Lungs were collected at 14-days and 28-days post bleomycin for assessment of fibrosis (Figure 4A-B). While total collagen (Figure 4C) and Ashcroft scoring (Figure 4D) were similar in WT and YTactive on day 14 after bleomycin, by day 28 YTactive mice had increased Ashcroft score and lung collagen content compared to WT mice. This indicated that sustained Yap/Taz activation in AT2 cells drives persistent lung fibrosis and suggested the effects were mediated through regulation of the repair/resolution phase. To specifically test whether YT activation in AT2 cells during repair/resolution exacerbates fibrosis, we administered bleomycin to YTactive mice and littermate controls, then on day 14 post-bleomycin, mice were administered tamoxifen to delete Stk3/4 (thus activate YT) or corn oil (control) (Figure 4E). YTactive mice had increased collagen content (Figure 4F) and worsened Ashcroft score (Figure 4G) at both day 28 and day 56 post-bleomycin. Together, these results indicated that persistent activation of YT in AT2 cells prevented resolution of lung injury and resulted in persistent lung fibrosis.

Figure 4. YTactive mice show increased and sustained fibrotic remodeling.

Figure 4.

A) Timeline of mouse injury model with Yap/Taz activated prior to bleomycin with lungs assessed at 14- and 28-days. B) Masson’s trichrome staining of lung tissue sections from wild-type and YTactive mice at 14-, 28- and 56-days after bleomycin or saline instillation. C) Quantitative analysis of total collagen and (D) Ashcroft scoring of fibrosis in WT and YTactive mice at 14- and 28-days after saline or bleomycin. WT saline (n=10), YTactive saline (n=8), day-14 WT bleomycin (n=16) and YTactive bleomycin (n=13), day-28 WT bleomycin (n=10) and YTactive (n=16) bleomycin treated mice. E) Timeline of mouse lung injury model with Yap/Taz activated after bleomycin and collection at 28- and 56-days. F) Quantitative analysis of total collagen and (G) Ashcroft scoring of fibrosis in wild-type and YTactive mice at 28- and 56-days after saline or bleomycin. WT saline (n=9), n = 8 YTactive saline (n=8), day-28 WT (n=13) and YTactive (n=14) bleomycin, day-56 WT (n=8) and YTactive (n=10) bleomycin-treated mice. Ordinary one-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons test with a single pooled variance was used to compare groups. Scale bars are 100μm.

Next, to determine if intervention with a pharmacological Yap/Taz inhibitor could restore alveolar repair/regeneration, tamoxifen-treated YTactive and WT mice were challenged with IT bleomycin and administered Verteporfin (60mg/kg intraperitoneal), a Yap/Taz-Tead inhibitor that prevents Yap/Taz nuclear localization and enhances degradation55, 14 days after bleomycin induced lung injury (Figure 5A). Consistent with the above findings, YTactive mice had increased collagen content and worsened lung injury scores at 28-days post-injury (Figure 5B-D). While Verteporfin did not impact fibrosis in WT mice, Verteporfin treatment of YTactive mice led to improved Ashcroft scores and lower total collagen content as measured by total sircol compared to vehicle-treated YTactive mice at 28-days post-injury (Figure 5B-D). Immunofluorescence analysis of WT and YTactive mouse lungs treated with saline or bleomycin showed increased Hopx+ AT1-like cells derived from lineage-labeled AT2 cells, as well as increased Sp-C+/Hopx+ transitional cells in YTactive bleomycin treated lungs (Figure 5E-G). Verteporfin treatment did not significantly impact the number of lineage-traced Hopx+ cells, however the number of transitional Sp-C+/Hopx+ cells was reduced, suggesting resolution of the transitional phenotype. YTactive bleomycin treated lungs had decreased overall Sp-C+ AT2 cells and increased Hopx+ AT1 like cells, which were not significantly affected by Verteporfin treatment (Figure 5I, Supplemental Figure 1). We observed that during single-dose bleomycin treatment, a small number of Scgb1a1+ airway cells (2.0+/−1.1%) migrate into the distal lung to potentially participate in repair. Scgb1a1+ cells were increased (10.3+/−6.2%) in the distal lung parenchyma in YTactive bleomycin-injured lungs compared to littermates, while Verteporfin treatment led to reduced parenchymal Scgb1a1+ cells (5.0+/−4.2%) compared to vehicle-treated YTactive mice (Figure 5H, J). These findings indicate that Verteporfin treatment after onset of fibrotic remodeling improved lung regeneration by antagonizing the sustained Yap/Taz activity in AT2 cells.

Figure 5. The Yap/Taz inhibitor Verteporfin partially rescues fibrotic phenotype in YTactive mice after bleomycin injury.

Figure 5.

A) Timeline of YTactive mouse bleomycin injury model with Yap/Taz inhibition with Verteporfin (60mg/kg) at 14-days post-injury. B) Masson’s trichrome staining of WT and YTactive mice with and without Verteporfin following saline or bleomycin. C) Ashcroft scoring of fibrosis and (D) total collagen analysis of wild-type and YTactive mice with and without Verteporfin following saline or bleomycin. WT saline (n=9). and YTactive saline (n=9), WT (n=9) and YTactive (n=8) saline and Verteporfin, WT (n=16) and YTactive (n=14) bleomycin, WT (n=11) and YTactive (n=16) bleomycin and Verteporfin-treated mice. E) Immunofluorescence analysis of Sp-C+ (red), Hopx+ (white), and lineage-traced AT2 (green) cells. Quantification of (F) lineage traced AT2 cells expressing Hopx, (G) Sp-C+/Hopx+ cells, and (I) total Sp-C+ cells per frame. H) Scgb1a1+ cells (green), AT2 lineage-labeled cells (red), and Sp-C+ cells (white) in wild-type and YTactive mice given saline, bleomycin, or bleomycin and Verteporfin. J) Quantification of Scgb1a1+ cells outside of airways in the alveolar region. WT and YTactive saline (n=6), WT and YTactive saline/Verteporfin (n=6), WT (n=14) and YTactive (n=16) bleomycin, WT (n=8) and YTactive (n=9) bleomycin/Verteporfin-treated mice. To determine significance an ordinary one-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons test with a single pooled variance was used. Immunofluorescent analysis scale bars represent 50μm. Trichrome staining scale bars are 100μm.

To examine the mechanisms through which sustained Yap/Taz activation in AT2 cells prevents functional alveolar repair and fibrosis resolution, we performed single-nucleus multiome (RNA+ATAC sequencing) of lung tissue from tamoxifen-treated WT and YTactive mice 28 days after bleomycin (or saline control). Following data integration, cells were clustered using scATAC-profiles and annotated using canonical marker genes, and the epithelial cell population subset was isolated (Figure 6A, B, Supplemental Figure 2A). Analysis of opened chromatin regions in bleomycin injured AT2 found increased gene activity scores of several abnormal genes including those associated with airway epithelial cells, i.e. Scgb1a1, Muc5b, Sox2 and AT1/ transitional cell markers Hopx and Krt19, while the AT2 associated transcription factor Etv5 was reduced (Supplemental Figure 2B, C) in YTactive bleomycin injured AT2 cells compared to WT bleomycin treated lungs. Marker gene analysis using promoter activity demonstrated that genes associated with airway (Sox2, Runx2), transitional cells (Hopx, Krt19), and proliferation (Mki67, Ccna2) were associated with AT2 cells from bleomycin injured YTactive mice (Figure 6C). Analysis of transcription factor binding site enrichment within opened promoter regions were associated with, among others, the AT2 cell regulator Cebpa (Figure 6D).

Figure 6. Single-Cell ATACseq demonstrates altered AT2 cell chromatin accessibility in YTactive bleomycin injured mouse lungs associated with aberrant transitional cells.

Figure 6.

A) UMAPs demonstrating clustering from 17 cell types in mouse lungs and (B) identifying cells recovered from respective genotype and treatment groups from snMultiome (RNA+ATAC-sequencing) of lung tissue from 28 days post-bleomycin. C) Volcano plot showing upregulated gene activity from AT2 cells of bleomycin injured wild-type (left) and YTactive (right) mice. D) Single cell ATAC sequencing shows enriched binding sites for open chromatin regions in bleomycin YTactive AT2 cells. The “avg_diff” is the fold-change computing the average difference in chromVAR z-score after performing differential testing between WT (left) and YTactive (right) mice.

To determine whether Verteporfin treatment corrected the abnormal AT2 differentiation identified by scATACseq, immunofluorescence and RNAscope analysis of lineage traced AT2 cells was used. RNA-ISH confirmed there were increased lineage-labeled Krt19+ cells (12.4+/−3.4% Krt19+/Lin+) in YTactive bleomycin injured mice compared to WT bleomycin injured lungs (0.9+/−0.4% Krt19+/Lin+). Verteporfin treated YTactive lungs had significantly reduced Krt19+ cells compared to vehicle treated YTactive bleomycin injured lungs (Figure 7A, B) (7.7+/−1.5% Krt19+/Lin+), although this remained higher than bleomycin-injured Verteporfin treated WT mice (1.6+/−0.3%). With evidence of altered Cebpa activity from our snATAC-seq results, we then assessed a CEBPA gene module score from human AT2 cells grown in SFFFM (from Figure 2). Genes associated with CEBPA activity were reduced in human epithelial cells cultured with sustained Yap/Taz activation by XMU-MP-1 (Supplemental Figure 2D). Finally, immunofluorescence analysis of Cebpa in lineage traced AT2 cells from WT (91.0+/−3.6%) and YTactive (87.1+/−5.3%) mouse lungs treated with saline or WT bleomycin treated (89.9+/−6.0%) demonstrate that Cebpa is readily detected in lineage traced Sp-C+ AT2 cells, however this was significantly reduced (58.6+/−9.9%) in AT2 cells in YTactive mouse lungs injured with bleomycin. Verteporfin treatment significantly increased Cebpa+ lineage-traced cells in the YTactive bleomycin injured lungs (85.1+/−4.8%) (Figure 7C, D). Collectively these findings suggest sustained Yap/Taz activity negatively regulates Cebpa or that the sustained Yap/Taz activation leads to a loss of AT2 cell identity thereby reducing Cebpa expression. Treatment of Verteporfin improved alveolar repair including decreasing Krt19+ transitional cells as well as restoring Cebpa expression in lineage traced AT2 cells. These findings indicate that disruption of aberrant persistent Yap/Taz activity can promote adaptive repair and potentially delay or stop the progression of pulmonary fibrosis.

Figure 7. Sustained Yap/Taz activation leads to aberrant alveolar epithelial cell differentiation and accumulation of transitional cell populations which is partially corrected by Verteporfin treatment.

Figure 7.

A) Immunofluorescence and RNAscope analysis of Krt19 (white) and lineage traced AT2 cells (green). B) Quantification of Krt19+/Lineage traced cells in each treatment group. WT and YTactive saline (n=4), WT and YTactive saline/Verteporfin (n=4), WT and YTactive bleomycin (n=6), and WT and YTactive bleomycin/Verteporfin-treated (n=6) mice. C) Immunofluorescence analysis of AT2 lineage-labeled cells (green), Cebpa (red), and Hopx+ AT1 cells (white) in wild-type and YTactive mice given saline, bleomycin, or bleomycin and Verteporfin. D) Quantification of Cebpa+ nuclei in AT2 lineage-labeled cells. Ordinary one-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons test with a single pooled variance was used to determine significance. Scale bars are 50μm.

Discussion:

Dysregulated repair of the alveolar epithelium is a hallmark of IPF. In this study, we demonstrate that both nuclear YAP and TAZ are increased in SP-C+ cells in the IPF lung. This is consistent with our previous work that showed increased YAP activity and loss of MST1/2 in the IPF epithelium20,40,41 and others have shown increased YAP in activated fibroblast populations39,42,44,45,56,57. Sustained YAP activity has also been identified in other forms of PF including Hermansky-Pudlak Syndrome58. Using a human alveolar organoid model, we found that pharmacologic activation of YT is sufficient to drive AT2 cells into a spectrum of aberrant “transitional” cell morphologies/phenotypes (but provocatively, not transcriptionally identifiable AT1 cells). Further, we found that YT activation in AT2 cells worsens experimental lung fibrosis and prevents repair, which could largely be ameliorated through treatment with a YT-inhibitor (Verteporfin) even after initiation of injury. Taken together, these results indicate that persistent YT activation in AT2 cells is maladaptive, preventing functional lung repair, and provide additional support for the concept that YT inhibition may be a promising therapeutic approach for IPF in the distal lung.

There have been several prior studies focusing on the role of Yap/Taz in lung development and injury repair using conditional Yap/Taz deletion strategies, while to date there has been limited investigation of the long-term impacts of persistent Yap/Taz activation in the lung epithelium22,35-37,59,60. In the developing lung, combined deletion of Yap/Taz using the Sftpc-CreERT2 and Sftpc-rtTA/tetOcre drivers led to reduced numbers of AT1 and AT2 cells22,23. Our current study, in concordance with our previous work showed Yap was rarely detected in AT1 cells and only expressed in AT2 cells during repair, while Taz was expressed in AT2 cells during repair and was readily detectable in most AT1 cells both during repair and at homeostasis35,37. Several studies have demonstrated that Yap/Taz are essential for AT2 to AT1 differentiation22,23,61,62 and are required for normal repair. Deletion of Yap/Taz prior to bleomycin, LPS, or bacterial injury results in worsened repair and fibrosis35-37. Others have shown that deletion of AT2 cell Taz alone is sufficient to prevent AT2 to AT1 differentiation and increased fibrotic response38. In addition, deletion of both Yap and Taz in Hopx+ cells resulted in loss of AT1 programming and caused these cells to adopt AT2-like features59. These studies lead to a paradigm in which YAP/TAZ is initially required for AT2 cell proliferation, while downregulation of YAP/TAZ supports AT2 cell maturation. Without initial YAP/TAZ activity, there is an absence of AT1 transitional cells and that at least TAZ is necessary to drive AT1 cell maturation and TAZ and/or YAP are required for AT1 cell maintenance. This concept shows a need for a finely regulated cell-type specific balance of YAP/TAZ activity during the repair process. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that activation of Yap and/or Taz is initially essential to guide adaptive alveolar epithelial repair, yet sustained aberrant AT2 activation promotes fibrotic remodeling.

Here, we find evidence that tight regulation of Yap/Taz activity is essential for proper alveolar repair. We previously showed that Yap activity in AT2 cells was increased early after bleomycin injury with peak nuclear localization at day 7, while Taz reached peak AT2 expression at 14-days post-injury. Both Yap and Taz returned to near zero activity by 21 days post-injury, indicating Yap/Taz are dynamically regulated during repair35. Our current study demonstrates that sustained activation of Yap/Taz in mouse AT2 cells did not alter the initial injury response or impact fibrosis at 14-days post injury but rather led to exacerbated fibrosis and the presence of persistent transitional cells by 28-days post-bleomycin that failed to resolve fibrosis by 8 weeks after injury. Inhibition of this sustained Yap/Taz activity with a single dose of Verteporfin at 14-days was sufficient to enhance fibrotic resolution in Yap/Taz active mice, although had no effect on WT mice at this time-point, further implicating that this was an epithelial Yap/Taz driven process. We acknowledge that this observation adds complexity to the growing body of literature in this area, including recent work that implied Hippo components inhibit alveolar repair (i.e., Yap/Taz activation may drive adaptive repair)63. There are several potential explanations for these seemingly opposing findings including differences in the degree and duration of Yap/Taz inhibition, as well as potentially distinct roles and timing of inhibition/activation of Yap and Taz in the repair process37. However, our results are consistent with the concept that there is sustained Yap/Taz activation in IPF and that sustained activation in human epithelial cells leads to abnormal epithelial cell differentiation.

Further, our in-vitro studies demonstrated that Yap/Taz activation was sufficient to lead to aberrant differentiation of human alveolar epithelial cells into KRT high and basal-like populations consistent with those seen in IPF15,16,20. Likewise, Yap/Taz activation resulted in increased Krt19+ transitional cells in mice following bleomycin injury. While the role of Krt19 is not yet fully elucidated, these intermediate filaments appear as a convergent marker of epithelial cell states associated with injury and maladaptive/fibrotic remodeling64. This resulted in increased fibrotic remodeling of the mouse lung consistent with a concept that the presence of abnormal persistent transitional cells leads to fibrotic remodeling and the progression of pulmonary fibrosis65,66. These transitional cells, whether they initially occur during adaptive repair or are disease emergent, exist in multiple sub-types identified by various Krt markers (Krt8+, KRT17+/, KRT5, Krt19+) or by various names (DAPTs, PATs)46,67-71. The presence of aberrant transitional cells has been identified in multiple forms of pulmonary fibrosis, including fibrosis associated with Hermansky-Pudlak Syndrome71, spontaneous fibrosis models associated with surfactant protein C mutations66, as well as bleomycin induced models of fibrosis72,73 and in IPF15-17,74. Our work has demonstrated that inhibition of the sustained Yap/Taz activation via Verteporfin resolves the presence of these Krt19+ transitional cells that were identified in the mouse lung, which coincided with decreased fibrotic remodeling. Recent work by others demonstrated that removal of other transitional cells, for example Krt8+ cells, also resulted in reduced fibrosis65. Collectively these studies demonstrate that the sustained presence of transitional cell populations, whether from normally occurring transitional cell populations or failed signaling pathways leading to aberrant differentiation of disease emergent populations, are associated with fibrotic progression and appear responsive to dynamic regulation of Yap/Taz activity.

This work also demonstrates that Yap/Taz sustained activation resulted in opened chromatin associated with Cebpa binding sites. We and others have demonstrated that Yap/Taz activation leads to opened/altered chromatin accessibility in the lung22 and other organs including the heart75. Generally, opened chromatin/increased presence of transcription factor binding sites are associated with increased activity. However, our immunofluorescent staining of Cebpa in lineage-traced AT2 cells, as well as gene module score in XMU-MP1 treated (YAP/TAZ activated via MST1/2 inhibition) human epithelial cells demonstrated decreased nuclear Cebpa localization and decreased gene module score respectively. These findings imply that Yap/Taz activity negatively regulates Cebpa. Cebpa was recently shown to be a regulator of AT2 cell fate and maintenance, as activation of Cebpa maintains AT2 cell transcriptional programs, while inhibition of Cebpa is necessary to allow AT2 cell differentiation into AT1 during both development and repair76,77. These studies implicate that there may be an inverse relationship between Yap/Taz and Cebpa in which there is a balance between Cebpa associated AT2 regulation and AT1 cell Yap/Taz associated signaling that regulates alveolar cell fate. These studies are consistent with our findings that Yap/Taz activation reduced Cebpa and recent work showing reduced alveolar Cebpa in the IPF lung78, and we have shown Yap/Taz to be activated in IPF. Inhibition of Yap/Taz via Verteporfin restored Cebpa nuclear localization in lineage traced AT2 cells, further supporting the concept that Cebpa and Yap/Taz signaling networks counter regulate each other.

One limitation of this study is that it does not completely discern whether the effect of Verteporfin is mediated predominantly by blocking the sustained activation of Yap/Taz in AT2 cells or both the sustained AT2 cell activation as well as the previously shown activation of Yap/Taz in activated fibroblast39,42,44,57. While others have reported different findings with Verteporfin treatment, our data indicate at minimum that the effects in the epithelium are important contributors to fibrotic remodeling. It is possible that some of the effects observed when treating human AECs in a reductionist organoid model with XMU-MP1 may differ from those seen in-vivo in which signaling from other cell types may intersect with this pathway. Finally, we acknowledge there may be differential timing or cell-type specific roles of Yap and Taz during alveolar differentiation and repair which will require further study.

Cumulatively, our findings demonstrate that the sustained activation of Yap/Taz via deletion of Hippo components Stk3/4 in mouse or by inhibition of the human homologues MST1/2 leads to the aberrant AT2 differentiation and persistence of transitional cells. This sustained Yap/Taz activation results in decreased fibrotic resolution resulting in persistent fibrosis 8-weeks after bleomycin induced lung injury. A single dose of Verteporfin was sufficient to promote resolution of transitional cell fates indicating restored alveolar repair and enhanced resolution of fibrosis in mouse injury models. These findings are consistent with the concept that in fibrotic models where persistent alveolar Yap/Taz activity are present, attenuating this pathway promotes resolution of fibrotic remodeling and potentially provides a therapeutic target to promote alveolar repair in pulmonary fibrosis.

Methods:

Sex as a biological variable:

To assess sex as a biological variable we used equal numbers of male and female mice for all studies. Secondary analysis found no significant difference between male and female mice and therefore for all subsequent analysis both male and female mice were combined for analyses.

Human Subjects and Samples.

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections and fresh lung tissue for cell isolation and organoid culture was obtained from deidentified IPF and declined donor lungs removed at the time of lung transplant surgery from the lung tissue repository at Vanderbilt University Medical Center (IRB#060165, #192004).

Human scRNA-sequencing reanalysis.

Previously published scRNA-sequencing from IPF/ILD and control lungs (GSE227136) was reanalyzed for differential expression of genes in AT2 cells. AT2 cells (including proliferating AT2) from IPF and control samples were subset from the published integrated dataset and subject-level pseudobulk differential expression testing was performing using deSEQ279.

Human Organoids.

Samples of human donor lungs were dissociated using dispase II (Roche 04942078001), collagenase I (Sigma-Aldrich C0130), and DNase (Millipore Sigma 260913-10MU) in phenol-free DMEM (Gibco 31053028). Cell suspensions were generated in C tubes (Miltenyi Biotec 130-093-237) using a gentleMACS dissociator then passed through 100 μm and 70μm filters (MTC Bio C4100 and C4070) to achieve single-cell suspensions. Epithelial cells were isolated by incubating cells with CD326+ microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec 130-061-101) and passing through LS columns (Miltenyi Biotec 130-042-401) positioned on a magnetic stand. CD326+ cells were plated in Matrigel droplets (Corning 356231) with serum-free feeder-free media (SFFFM) and expanded. Organoids were passaged in bulk, as whole organoids were liberated from Matrigel with 2mg/mL dispase for 1 hour with gentle disruption and passaged at 1:4 in Matrigel: SFFFM. At initial plating and after each passage Rock inhibitor was added to the media for days 1-3. Organoids were then treated with 3μm XMU-MP-1 (Tocris 6482) starting at day 4 for Yap/Taz activation. After 1 week, media was switched to either SFFFM or differentiation media (ADM) for another week then organoids were collected for end-point analysis.

Human organoid cell morphology:

Organoids generated from declined donor lungs were grown to confluency in domed Matrigel culture in SFFF media (StemCell Alveolar Organoid Media # 100-0847) then liberated as whole organoids with dispase (2mg/ml for 1hr with gentle disruption after 30min). Organoids were then counted and plated in 10ul of 1:1 Matrigel: SFFFM at ~350 organoids per well into 96 well μ-Plate angiogenesis imaging plates (Ibidi 89646). Organoids were then cultured for 7 days in SFFFM with indicated treatments at day 4 (DMSO or 3μM XMU-MP-1 (MedChemExpress Cat. No.: HY-100526) then transitioned to Alveolar Differentiation Media (StemCell # 100-0861) or maintained in SFFFM for 7 days. Samples were then washed with PBS and fixed with 0.4% Glutaraldehyde for 20min at RT. Following 2x washes with PBS, 0.2% NaBH4 in dH2O was applied and incubated at 4C for 1hr for background quenching of autofluorescence of the Matrigel. Wells were then washed 3x in PBS. A staining solution in PBS-X (0.1% Triton X-100) containing Hoechst (15ug/ml), Syto14 (7.5 uM), Wheat Germ agglutinin conjugated to Alexafluor 555, (3.5ug/ml), and Phalloidin-568 (ThermoFisher A12380) (132nM) was prepared fresh and applied to the wells overnight at 4C with light excluded. Wells were then washed 3x for 40 minutes with PBS-X and imaged on an ImageXpress.AI (Molecular devices) as maximum intensity projections of 5μm Z-stacks across a depth of 40μm. All images were collected on the same day under the same settings for the entire plate. Images were analyzed using InCarta (Molecular Devices) with a SINAP custom trained algorithm for organoid segmentation based on TxRed (Phalloidin). Following organoid level masking (parent), nuclei were then segmented and analyzed. Standard multivariate analytic parameters within InCarta were used for quantification of organoids across all channels. Nuclei were only analyzed for morphology and RNA characteristics (SYTO14). Data was then analyzed in R using a custom pipeline starting at field level data (13 fields per well) consisting of metadata assignment, robust normalization followed by median absolute deviation (MAD) calculation and outlier removal in PCA space following Z-score calculation. Any missing data was then imputed with feature median, and columns with zero variance (failed metrics) were removed. Finally, PCA analysis was performed for display and phenotypic distance analysis in PCA space using Hotelling's T-Test and multiple comparisons adjusted.

Human organoid single-cell isolation and processing for scRNA-seq:

To perform single-cell RNAseq, human organoids were treated in dispase (2mg/ml) for 1hr with gentle disruption after 30 minutes to break up the Matrigel and organoids. Organoids were washed twice in PBS and spun down at 500g. Organoids were then treated with 1mL trypsin (0.05%) for 7 minutes, then washed in PBS containing 5% BSA, washed 2 more times in PBS, then passed through 100μm, then 70μm cell filters to generate single cell suspensions. Samples were pooled across donors per treatment group. We then used 10X genomics single-cell RNA sequencing to target 10,000 cells per group, with 50,000 reads per cell. Donors were genetically demultiplexed using Demuxafy80 and the Vireo pipeline81. Clustering was performed and identified with marker genes using Seurat/Signac piepline82,83.

Animal husbandry and YAP/TAZ gene regulation.

These studies were approved by the IACUC at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. SftpcCreert2(blh)Stk3fl/flStk4fl/fl mice (JAX:02805484 crossed with JAX:01763585) were crossed with Stk3fl/flStk4fl/fl mice to generate experimental cohorts (YTactive) with Cre littermates used as wild-type controls. SftpcCreert2rosatdTomato Stk3fl/flStk4fl/fl mice crossed with Stk3fl/flStk4fl/fl mice served as experimental cohorts for lineage-traced studies, with SftpcCreert2rosatdTomato mice (JAX:02805484 crossed with JAX:00790986) were used as lineage traced WT controls. Mice were administered tamoxifen (Millipore Sigma T5648) dissolved in corn oil via intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection at 100mg/kg either 3-weeks prior to or 2-weeks after bleomycin injury to induce Yap/Taz activation and lineage tracing. For Yap/Taz inhibition experiments, Verteporfin (Cell Signaling 64260) dissolved in DMSO was administered via i.p. injection at 60mg/kg 2-weeks after injury.

Lung Injury and collection.

Bleomycin (0.08 IU) was suspended in sterile saline and administered intratracheally (i.t.) at 100μL volume with equal volumes of saline administered as controls. Mice were sacrificed at indicated timepoints. The right lung was inflation-fixed with 10% buffered formalin at 25cm H2O pressure, excised, and submerged in 10% buffered formalin. The left lung was flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and processed for Sircol collagen analysis or for nuclei isolation for analysis.

IHC Analysis.

Inflation fixed mouse lungs (as described above) and organoids were fixed overnight at 4°C then processed and embedded in paraffin. Human lung samples were collected from de-identified transplant lungs from IPF patients and donor lungs collected were rejected for transplant. All histological staining was done on 5μm sections, and immunofluorescence and/or RNAscope RNA-ISH was conducted with antibodies and RNA probes listed in supplemental table 2. Citrate Buffer (pH 6, Sigma Aldrich, C9999) were used for antigen retrieval then slides were washed with deionized water. Slides were covered in block buffer (5% BSA) for 1 hour at room temperature. Block was removed and primary antibodies were added and allowed to incubate overnight at 4°C. Slides were washed 3X in PBST and secondary antibody was added and allowed to incubate for 2 hours at room temperature. For human lung samples, Vector TrueVIEW (Vector Laboratories Cat# SP-8400) was added as per the manufacturer’s instructions for 5 minutes to quench autofluorescence of red blood cells and collagen. Slides were washed again 3X in PBST and cover slips were applied with mounting media. Slides were imaged capturing 10 non-overlapping frames/lung with a 20X objective on a Keyence BZ-X710 inverted fluorescence microscope.

Fibrosis Scoring.

Semi-quantitative analysis of fibrosis was done utilizing modified Ashcroft scoring (Hübner et al., 2008) of Masson’s trichrome stained slides. For each lung, 2 independent blinded scorers assessed at least 10 20X objective magnification frames/lung and scores were averaged. If there was a scoring discrepancy of greater than 1.5, scores were discussed, and consensus was reached. Collagen content was quantified using Biocolor’s sircol soluble collagen assay kit (Biocolor S5000).

Single-cell Multiome Sequencing and Analysis.

Single nuclei multiome sequencing (ATAC+RNA) was performed using 10x genomics chromium sequencing targeting 10,000 nuclei per sample 50,000 reads per nuclei. Single Nuclei were isolated from flash frozen left lung tissue pooling 1 male and 1 female mouse per group and sequencing was aligned to GRcm39 and total of 21,144 nuclei were sequenced post processing across samples. Analysis was performed by the Creative Data Solutions genomic analysis group at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Gene expression mapped to the genome with relatively low confidence/read depth. SoupX and scDoublet were used to remove ambient DNA and detect doublets. Clustering was performed and identified with marker genes using Seurat/Signac piepline82,83 using scRNA sequencing from other in-house mouse lung samples to identify cell-type specific clusters which resulted in 17 cell types identified. ATACseq was then mapped to these clusters with open chromatin associated with marker genes used to map to clusters identified from the RNA expression analysis using Harmony. Plots were made using ggplot2 and scCustomize. For ATACseq analysis MACS287 was used for peak calling. Gene activity scores were generated using peaks within 2kb upstream of the transcriptional start sites. Transcription factor enrichment within promoters were identified using Chromvar enriched motif with Signac88.

Statistics:

Statistics were performed using Graphpad Prism 10. Normality was tested using Shapiro-Wilk and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests. For 2 variable comparisons, unpaired parametric t-tests were used. For comparisons with more than 2 variables, ordinary one-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons test with a single pooled variance was used.

Study Approval:

Mouse studies were approved by Vanderbilt University Medical Center’s IACUC, under approval M1500027 and M2400059. Deidentified human lung samples were acquired, and human studies were approved under protocol 060165 and 192004 by Vanderbilt University Medical Center’s human subjects IRB.

Supplementary Material

1

Acknowledgements:

The authors meet criteria for authorship as recommended by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) and were fully responsible for all aspects of the study and publication development. This was supported by NIH/NHLBI R01HL145272 (JAK), R01HL153246(JAK) Vanderbilt Faculty Research Scholars (JJG, ASM), The Francis Family Foundation (JJG, ASM), R01HL151016 (TSB), The Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation Fellowship (ASM), The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical Translational Research (VICTR) VR55627 and VR55246 (JJG) under CTSA 5UL1TR002243. Imaging obtained for morphologic analysis were captured on the ImageXpress Micro Confocal High Content Screening System which is housed and managed within the Vanderbilt High-Throughput Screening Core Facility, an institutionally supported core, and was funded by NIH Shared Instrumentation Grant 1S10OD028719.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest Statement: JAK reports grants/contracts from Boehringer Ingelheim and Bristol-Myers-Squibb and consulting for Boehringer Ingelheim.

Data Availability:

Genomic data is available for download at GSEAXXXX (Data are being uploaded to the Gene Expression Omnibus and analysis script is available at Github https://github.com/KropskiLab/Gokey-2025_yaptaz_activation).

References

  • 1.Meltzer EB, Noble PW. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2008;3:8. DOI: 10.1186/1750-1172-3-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Raghu G, Collard HR, Egan JJ, et al. An official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT statement: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;183(6):788–824. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.2009-040GL. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Costabel U, Inoue Y, Richeldi L, et al. Efficacy of Nintedanib in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis across Prespecified Subgroups in INPULSIS. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016;193(2):178–85. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201503-0562OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kolb M, Richeldi L, Behr J, et al. Nintedanib in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and preserved lung volume. Thorax 2017;72(4):340–346. DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-208710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kropski JA, Blackwell TS. Progress in Understanding and Treating Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Annu Rev Med 2019;70:211–224. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-med-041317-102715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chilosi M, Poletti V, Murer B, et al. Abnormal re-epithelialization and lung remodeling in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: the role of deltaN-p63. Lab Invest 2002;82(10):1335–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kim KK, Wei Y, Szekeres C, et al. Epithelial cell alpha3beta1 integrin links beta-catenin and Smad signaling to promote myofibroblast formation and pulmonary fibrosis. J Clin Invest 2009;119(1):213–24. DOI: 10.1172/JCI36940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kropski JA, Blackwell TS, Loyd JE. The genetic basis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir J 2015;45(6):1717–27. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00163814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lawson WE, Loyd JE, Degryse AL. Genetics in pulmonary fibrosis--familial cases provide clues to the pathogenesis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Med Sci 2011;341(6):439–43. DOI: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e31821a9d7a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Li M, Krishnaveni MS, Li C, et al. Epithelium-specific deletion of TGF-beta receptor type II protects mice from bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis. J Clin Invest 2011;121(1):277–87. DOI: 10.1172/JCI42090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zacharias WJ, Frank DB, Zepp JA, et al. Regeneration of the lung alveolus by an evolutionarily conserved epithelial progenitor. Nature 2018;555(7695):251–255. DOI: 10.1038/nature25786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Desai TJ, Brownfield DG, Krasnow MA. Alveolar progenitor and stem cells in lung development, renewal and cancer. Nature 2014;507(7491):190–4. DOI: 10.1038/nature12930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hogan BL, Barkauskas CE, Chapman HA, et al. Repair and regeneration of the respiratory system: complexity, plasticity, and mechanisms of lung stem cell function. Cell Stem Cell 2014;15(2):123–38. DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2014.07.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jacob A, Morley M, Hawkins F, et al. Differentiation of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells into Functional Lung Alveolar Epithelial Cells. Cell Stem Cell 2017;21(4):472–488 e10. DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2017.08.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Adams TS, Schupp JC, Poli S, et al. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals ectopic and aberrant lung-resident cell populations in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Sci Adv 2020;6(28):eaba1983. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aba1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Habermann AC, Gutierrez AJ, Bui LT, et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals profibrotic roles of distinct epithelial and mesenchymal lineages in pulmonary fibrosis. Sci Adv 2020;6(28):eaba1972. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aba1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kobayashi Y, Tata A, Konkimalla A, et al. Persistence of a regeneration-associated, transitional alveolar epithelial cell state in pulmonary fibrosis. Nat Cell Biol 2020;22(8):934–946. DOI: 10.1038/s41556-020-0542-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Plantier L, Crestani B, Wert SE, et al. Ectopic respiratory epithelial cell differentiation in bronchiolised distal airspaces in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Thorax 2011;66(8):651–7. DOI: 10.1136/thx.2010.151555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chanda D, Otoupalova E, Smith SR, Volckaert T, De Langhe SP, Thannickal VJ. Developmental pathways in the pathogenesis of lung fibrosis. Mol Aspects Med 2019;65:56–69. DOI: 10.1016/j.mam.2018.08.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Xu Y, Mizuno T., Sridharan A., Du Y., Guo M., Tang J., Wikenheiser-Brokamp K.A., A-K.T. Perl, Funari V.A., Gokey J.J., Stripp B.R. and Whitsett J.A. Single cell RNA-sequencing identifies diverse roles of epithelial cells in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. JCI Insight 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Burgess CL, Huang J, Bawa P, et al. Generation of human alveolar epithelial type I cells from pluripotent stem cells. bioRxiv 2023:2023.01.19.524655. DOI: 10.1101/2023.01.19.524655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gokey JJ, Snowball J, Sridharan A, et al. YAP regulates alveolar epithelial cell differentiation and AGER via NFIB/KLF5/NKX2-1. iScience 2021;24(9):102967. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nantie LB, Young RE, Paltzer WG, et al. Lats1/2 inactivation reveals Hippo function in alveolar type I cell differentiation during lung transition to air breathing. Development 2018;145(21). DOI: 10.1242/dev.163105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.LeBlanc L, Ramirez N, Kim J. Context-dependent roles of YAP/TAZ in stem cell fates and cancer. Cell Mol Life Sci 2021;78(9):4201–4219. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-021-03781-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Luo J, Li P. Context-dependent transcriptional regulations of YAP/TAZ in stem cell and differentiation. Stem Cell Res Ther 2022;13(1):10. DOI: 10.1186/s13287-021-02686-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Pfleger CM. The Hippo Pathway: A Master Regulatory Network Important in Development and Dysregulated in Disease. Curr Top Dev Biol 2017;123:181–228. (Review). DOI: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2016.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pajtler KW, Wei Y, Okonechnikov K, et al. YAP1 subgroup supratentorial ependymoma requires TEAD and nuclear factor I-mediated transcriptional programmes for tumorigenesis. Nat Commun 2019;10(1):3914. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-11884-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Shimomura T, Miyamura N, Hata S, Miura R, Hirayama J, Nishina H. The PDZ-binding motif of Yes-associated protein is required for its co-activation of TEAD-mediated CTGF transcription and oncogenic cell transforming activity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2014;443(3):917–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.12.100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Stein C, Bardet AF, Roma G, et al. YAP1 Exerts Its Transcriptional Control via TEAD-Mediated Activation of Enhancers. PLoS Genet 2015;11(8):e1005465. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chuang LSH, Ito Y. The Multiple Interactions of RUNX with the Hippo-YAP Pathway. Cells 2021;10(11). DOI: 10.3390/cells10112925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ebrahimighaei R, Sala-Newby GB, Hudson C, et al. Combined role for YAP-TEAD and YAP-RUNX2 signalling in substrate-stiffness regulation of cardiac fibroblast proliferation. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res 2022;1869(11):119329. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2022.119329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Grannas K, Arngarden L, Lonn P, et al. Crosstalk between Hippo and TGFbeta: Subcellular Localization of YAP/TAZ/Smad Complexes. J Mol Biol 2015;427(21):3407–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Piersma B, Bank RA, Boersema M. Signaling in Fibrosis: TGF-beta, WNT, and YAP/TAZ Converge. Front Med (Lausanne) 2015;2:59. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2015.00059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Qin Z, Xia W, Fisher GJ, Voorhees JJ, Quan T. YAP/TAZ regulates TGF-beta/Smad3 signaling by induction of Smad7 via AP-1 in human skin dermal fibroblasts. Cell Commun Signal 2018;16(1):18. DOI: 10.1186/s12964-018-0232-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.DiGiovanni GT, Han W, Sherrill TP, et al. Epithelial Yap/Taz are required for functional alveolar regeneration following acute lung injury. JCI Insight 2023;8(19). DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.173374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.LaCanna R, Liccardo D, Zhang P, et al. Yap/Taz regulate alveolar regeneration and resolution of lung inflammation. J Clin Invest 2019;129(5):2107–2122. DOI: 10.1172/JCI125014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Warren R, Lyu H, Klinkhammer K, De Langhe SP. Hippo signaling impairs alveolar epithelial regeneration in pulmonary fibrosis. Elife 2023;12. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.85092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sun T, Huang Z, Zhang H, et al. TAZ is required for lung alveolar epithelial cell differentiation after injury. JCI Insight 2019;5. DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.128674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Aravamudhan A, Haak AJ, Choi KM, et al. TBK1 regulates YAP/TAZ and fibrogenic fibroblast activation. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2020;318(5):L852–L863. DOI: 10.1152/ajplung.00324.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gokey JJ, Patel SD, Kropski JA. The Role of Hippo/YAP Signaling in Alveolar Repair and Pulmonary Fibrosis. Frontiers in Medicine 2021;8(1774) (Mini Review) (In English). DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.752316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gokey JJ, Sridharan A, Xu Y, et al. Active epithelial Hippo signaling in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. JCI Insight 2018;3(6). DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.98738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Haak AJ, Kostallari E, Sicard D, et al. Selective YAP/TAZ inhibition in fibroblasts via dopamine receptor D1 agonism reverses fibrosis. Sci Transl Med 2019;11(516). DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aau6296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Huang LS, Sudhadevi T, Fu P, et al. Sphingosine Kinase 1/S1P Signaling Contributes to Pulmonary Fibrosis by Activating Hippo/YAP Pathway and Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species in Lung Fibroblasts. Int J Mol Sci 2020;21(6). DOI: 10.3390/ijms21062064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Liu F, Lagares D, Choi KM, et al. Mechanosignaling through YAP and TAZ drives fibroblast activation and fibrosis. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2015;308(4):L344–57. DOI: 10.1152/ajplung.00300.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Papavassiliou KA, Sofianidi AA, Spiliopoulos FG, Gogou VA, Gargalionis AN, Papavassiliou AG. YAP/TAZ Signaling in the Pathobiology of Pulmonary Fibrosis. Cells 2024;13(18). DOI: 10.3390/cells13181519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bui LT, Winters NI, Chung M-I, et al. Single-cell RNA-sequencing reveals dysregulation of molecular programs associated with SARS-CoV-2 severity and outcomes in patients with chronic lung disease. bioRxiv 2020:2020.10.20.347187. DOI: 10.1101/2020.10.20.347187. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Natri HM, Del Azodi CB, Peter L, et al. Cell-type-specific and disease-associated expression quantitative trait loci in the human lung. Nat Genet 2024;56(4):595–604. DOI: 10.1038/s41588-024-01702-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Katsura H, Sontake V, Tata A, et al. Human Lung Stem Cell-Based Alveolospheres Provide Insights into SARS-CoV-2-Mediated Interferon Responses and Pneumocyte Dysfunction. Cell Stem Cell 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2020.10.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Fan F, He Z, Kong LL, et al. Pharmacological targeting of kinases MST1 and MST2 augments tissue repair and regeneration. Sci Transl Med 2016;8(352):352ra108. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf2304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lukonin I, Zinner M, Liberali P. Organoids in image-based phenotypic chemical screens. Exp Mol Med 2021;53(10):1495–1502. DOI: 10.1038/s12276-021-00641-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Seal S, Trapotsi MA, Spjuth O, et al. A Decade in a Systematic Review: The Evolution and Impact of Cell Painting. bioRxiv 2024. DOI: 10.1101/2024.05.04.592531. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Jafarinia H, Khalilimeybodi A, Barrasa-Fano J, Fraley SI, Rangamani P, Carlier A. Insights gained from computational modeling of YAP/TAZ signaling for cellular mechanotransduction. NPJ Syst Biol Appl 2024;10(1):90. DOI: 10.1038/s41540-024-00414-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Jones DL, Hallstrom GF, Jiang X, et al. Mechanoepigenetic regulation of extracellular matrix homeostasis via Yap and Taz. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2023;120(22):e2211947120. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2211947120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Wada K, Itoga K, Okano T, Yonemura S, Sasaki H. Hippo pathway regulation by cell morphology and stress fibers. Development 2011;138(18):3907–14. DOI: 10.1242/dev.070987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Wang C, Zhu X, Feng W, et al. Verteporfin inhibits YAP function through up-regulating 14-3-3sigma sequestering YAP in the cytoplasm. Am J Cancer Res 2016;6(1):27–37. (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27073720). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Chen Y, Zhao X, Sun J, et al. YAP1/Twist promotes fibroblast activation and lung fibrosis that conferred by miR-15a loss in IPF. Cell Death Differ 2019;26(9):1832–1844. DOI: 10.1038/s41418-018-0250-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Jorgenson AJ, Choi KM, Sicard D, et al. TAZ activation drives fibroblast spheroid growth, expression of profibrotic paracrine signals, and context-dependent ECM gene expression. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2017;312(3):C277–C285. DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00205.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kook S, Wang P, Meng S, et al. AP-3-dependent targeting of flippase ATP8A1 to lamellar bodies suppresses activation of YAP in alveolar epithelial type 2 cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021;118(20). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2025208118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Penkala IJ, Liberti DC, Pankin J, et al. Age-dependent alveolar epithelial plasticity orchestrates lung homeostasis and regeneration. Cell Stem Cell 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2021.04.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Lange AW, Sridharan A, Xu Y, Stripp BR, Perl AK, Whitsett JA. Hippo/Yap signaling controls epithelial progenitor cell proliferation and differentiation in the embryonic and adult lung. J Mol Cell Biol 2015;7(1):35–47. DOI: 10.1093/jmcb/mju046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Zhou B, Flodby P, Luo J, et al. Claudin-18-mediated YAP activity regulates lung stem and progenitor cell homeostasis and tumorigenesis. J Clin Invest 2018;128(3):970–984. DOI: 10.1172/JCI90429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Burgess CL, Huang J, Bawa PS, et al. Generation of human alveolar epithelial type I cells from pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2024;31(5):657–675.e8. DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2024.03.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Wang J, Zhu F, Luo R, et al. YAP Alleviates Pulmonary Fibrosis Through Promoting Alveolar Regeneration via Modulating the Stemness of Alveolar Type 2 Cells. Stem Cells Dev 2024;33(21-22):586–594. DOI: 10.1089/scd.2024.0101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Windoffer R, Beil M, Magin TM, Leube RE. Cytoskeleton in motion: the dynamics of keratin intermediate filaments in epithelia. J Cell Biol 2011;194(5):669–78. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201008095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Wang F, Ting C, Riemondy KA, et al. Regulation of epithelial transitional states in murine and human pulmonary fibrosis. J Clin Invest 2023;133(22). DOI: 10.1172/JCI165612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Hoffman ET, Barboza WR, Rodriguez LR, et al. Aberrant Transitional Alveolar Epithelial Cells Promote Pathogenic Activation of Lung Fibroblasts in Preclinical Fibrosis Modeling. bioRxiv 2024:2024.06.17.599351. DOI: 10.1101/2024.06.17.599351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Tsukui T, Sun KH, Wetter JB, et al. Collagen-producing lung cell atlas identifies multiple subsets with distinct localization and relevance to fibrosis. Nat Commun 2020;11(1):1920. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15647-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Strunz M, Simon LM, Ansari M, et al. Alveolar regeneration through a Krt8+ transitional stem cell state that persists in human lung fibrosis. Nat Commun 2020;11(1):3559. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-17358-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Choi J, Park JE, Tsagkogeorga G, et al. Inflammatory Signals Induce AT2 Cell-Derived Damage-Associated Transient Progenitors that Mediate Alveolar Regeneration. Cell Stem Cell 2020;27(3):366–382 e7. DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2020.06.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Jiang P, Gil de Rubio R, Hrycaj SM, et al. Ineffectual Type 2-to-Type 1 Alveolar Epithelial Cell Differentiation in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Persistence of the KRT8(hi) Transitional State. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020;201(11):1443–1447. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201909-1726LE. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Wang JY, Michki SN, Sitaraman S, et al. Dysregulated alveolar epithelial cell progenitor function and identity in Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome. JCI Insight 2024;10(3). DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.183483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.McCall AS, Gutor S, Tanjore H, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor 2 regulates alveolar regeneration after repetitive injury in three-dimensional cellular and in vivo models. Sci Transl Med 2025;17(780):eadk8623. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.adk8623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Redente EF, Black BP, Backos DS, et al. Persistent, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis and Epithelial Remodeling in Mice. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2021;64(6):669–676. DOI: 10.1165/rcmb.2020-0542MA. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Vannan A, Lyu R, Williams AL, et al. Spatial transcriptomics identifies molecular niche dysregulation associated with distal lung remodeling in pulmonary fibrosis. Nat Genet 2025. DOI: 10.1038/s41588-025-02080-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Monroe TO, Hill MC, Morikawa Y, et al. YAP Partially Reprograms Chromatin Accessibility to Directly Induce Adult Cardiogenesis In Vivo. Dev Cell 2019;48(6):765–779 e7. DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.01.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Hassan D, Chen J. CEBPA restricts alveolar type 2 cell plasticity during development and injury-repair. Nature Communications 2024;15(1):4148. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-48632-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Sawhney AS, Deskin BJ, Cai J, et al. A molecular circuit regulates fate plasticity in emerging and adult AT2 cells. bioRxiv 2025:2025.04.28.650846. DOI: 10.1101/2025.04.28.650846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Tan Q, Wellmerling JH, Song S, et al. Targeting CEBPA to restore cellular identity and tissue homeostasis in pulmonary fibrosis. JCI Insight 2024;9(16). DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.175290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 2014;15(12):550. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Neavin D, Senabouth A, Arora H, et al. Demuxafy: improvement in droplet assignment by integrating multiple single-cell demultiplexing and doublet detection methods. Genome Biol 2024;25(1):94. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-024-03224-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Huang Y, McCarthy DJ, Stegle O. Vireo: Bayesian demultiplexing of pooled single-cell RNA-seq data without genotype reference. Genome Biol 2019;20(1):273. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-019-1865-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Butler A, Hoffman P, Smibert P, Papalexi E, Satija R. Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species. Nat Biotechnol 2018;36(5):411–420. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.4096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Hafemeister C, Satija R. Normalization and variance stabilization of single-cell RNA-seq data using regularized negative binomial regression. Genome Biol 2019;20(1):296. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-019-1874-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Rock JR, Barkauskas CE, Cronce MJ, et al. Multiple stromal populations contribute to pulmonary fibrosis without evidence for epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011;108(52):E1475–83. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1117988108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Lu L, Li Y, Kim SM, et al. Hippo signaling is a potent in vivo growth and tumor suppressor pathway in the mammalian liver. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107(4):1437–42. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0911427107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Madisen L, Zwingman TA, Sunkin SM, et al. A robust and high-throughput Cre reporting and characterization system for the whole mouse brain. Nat Neurosci 2010;13(1):133–40. DOI: 10.1038/nn.2467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Zhang Y, Liu T, Meyer CA, et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol 2008;9(9):R137. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Stuart T, Srivastava A, Madad S, Lareau CA, Satija R. Single-cell chromatin state analysis with Signac. Nat Methods 2021;18(11):1333–1341. DOI: 10.1038/s41592-021-01282-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

Data Availability Statement

Genomic data is available for download at GSEAXXXX (Data are being uploaded to the Gene Expression Omnibus and analysis script is available at Github https://github.com/KropskiLab/Gokey-2025_yaptaz_activation).


Articles from bioRxiv are provided here courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Preprints

RESOURCES