Skip to main content
International Journal of Cardiology. Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention logoLink to International Journal of Cardiology. Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention
letter
. 2025 Jul 31;27:200482. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcrp.2025.200482

Comment on examining maternal and fetal outcomes across various subtypes of hypertension during pregnancy

Qiang Ma 1, Jianfen Tang 1,
PMCID: PMC12340504  PMID: 40809094

To the Editor

We read with great interest the study by Alhuneafat et al. examining maternal and fetal outcomes across various hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) [1]. Using national database, the authors provided valuable insights into the risk stratification of HDP subtypes. Nevertheless, several issues merit further discussion.

First, the potential for residual confounding remains a concern, as administrative datasets such as NIS, however robust, often lack information on important maternal clinical characteristics (e.g., body mass index, smoking, or family history) that are strong predictors of both HDP and adverse outcomes [2].

Second, the study uses diagnostic codes to classify HDP subtypes, but misclassification bias may arise due to variations in physician coding practices or hospital policies [3]. For instance, evolving definitions and diagnostic criteria for preeclampsia may influence trends over time, especially given changes after the ACOG guideline updates [4]. Sensitivity analyses using validated HDP algorithms could enhance the reliability of the findings.

Third, while the authors compared multiple outcome rates across HDP subtypes, they did not formally address the potential inflation of type I error due to multiple comparisons. Advanced statistical approaches, such as false discovery rate adjustments, could further safeguard the interpretation [5].

Lastly, although the study demonstrates an association between specific HDP subtypes and adverse outcomes, caution is warranted when interpreting causality given the cross-sectional nature of the data.

In summary, while this analysis offers an important contribution, future research should aim to incorporate more granular clinical and behavioral data, incorporate validated phenotyping strategies, and adopt statistical safeguards against multiple testing.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Qiang Ma: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Data curation. Jianfen Tang: Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing.

Data availability

None.

Ethical compliance

Not applicable.

Study funding

Jiaxing Science and Technology Bureau (2023AD31099).

Declaration of competing interest

None.

Acknowledgments

None.

Handling Editor: Dr D Levy

References

  • 1.Alhuneafat L., Ghanem F., Nandy S., Khan S., Puttur A., Jabri A., Haddad A., Ramu B., Sabol B., Schultz J., Carlson S. Examining maternal and fetal outcomes across various subtypes of hypertension during pregnancy. Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2025;25 doi: 10.1016/j.ijcrp.2025.200413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Countouris M., Mahmoud Z., Cohen J.B., Crousillat D., Hameed A.B., Harrington C.M., Hauspurg A., Honigberg M.C., Lewey J., Lindley K., McLaughlin M.M., Sachdev N., Sarma A., Shapero K., Sinkey R., Tita A., Wong K.E., Yang E., Cho L., Bello N.A. Hypertension in pregnancy and postpartum: current standards and opportunities to improve care. Circulation. 2025;151(7):490–507. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.073302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lain S.J., Hadfield R.M., Raynes-Greenow C.H., Ford J.B., Mealing N.M., Algert C.S., Roberts C.L. Quality of data in perinatal population health databases: a systematic review. Med. Care (Phila.) 2012;50(4):e7–e20. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31821d2b1d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lai J., Syngelaki A., Nicolaides K.H., von Dadelszen P., Magee L.A. Impact of new definitions of preeclampsia at term on identification of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021;224(5):518.e1–518.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Glickman M.E., Rao S.R., Schultz M.R. False discovery rate control is a recommended alternative to Bonferroni-type adjustments in health studies. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2014;67(8):850–857. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

None.


Articles from International Journal of Cardiology. Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES