Skip to main content
Molecular Metabolism logoLink to Molecular Metabolism
. 2025 Jul 21;99:102219. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2025.102219

Exercise training remodels inter-organ endocrine networks

Cheehoon Ahn 1, Andrea L Hevener 2,3, Laurie J Goodyear 4, Sue C Bodine 5, Karyn A Esser 6, Marcus M Seldin 7, Lauren M Sparks 1,
PMCID: PMC12340562  PMID: 40701293

Abstract

Background

Exercise induces organism-wide molecular adaptations, partly mediated by humoral factors released in response to acute and chronic physical activity. However, the extent and specificity of endocrine effects from training-induced secreted factors remain unclear.

Methods

Here, we applied systems genetics approaches to quantify inter-organ endocrine networks using multi-tissue transcriptomics and proteomics data collected from endurance-trained rats in The Molecular Transducers of Physical Activity Consortium (MoTrPAC).

Results

Eight weeks of endurance training significantly altered both the magnitude and specificity of endocrine effects across multiple origin-target tissue pairs. Subcutaneous white adipose tissue emerged as a key endocrine regulator impacted by training, while extracellular matrix-derived factors were identified as globally regulated secretory features in trained vs sedentary animals. Notably, secretory Wnt signaling factors were identified as key mediators of exercise-induced endocrine adaptations in multiple tissues.

Conclusion

Our systems genetics framework provides an unprecedented atlas of inter-organ communication significantly remodeled by endurance exercise, serving as a valuable resource for novel exerkine discovery.

Keywords: MoTrPAC, Exercise, Endocrine network, Tissue crosstalk

Highlights

  • Exercise training remodels endocrine networks across multi-tissues.

  • Systems genetics analysis reveal ECM and Wnt factors as core mediators of exercise-induced tissue crosstalk.

  • A multi-tissue atlas of exercise-induced endocrine signals to guide exerkine discovery and mechanism studies.

1. Introduction

Exercise enhances cardiometabolic, immune, and neurological health [1]. These health benefits are accompanied by multi-organ molecular adaptations, partially mediated by humoral exerkines—factors released from various tissues following physical activity [2,3]. In addition, daily physical activity or daily exercise may induce chronic alterations in inter-organ communication that extend beyond the acute exerkine response [4]. Recent advancements in secretome profiling have enabled the identification of the cellular and tissue origins of acutely induced exerkines [5], greatly expanding our understanding of exercise-stimulated humoral signaling. Furthermore, inter-tissue correlations of exercise-responsive metabolomes show a tissue-pair co-regulation [6]. However, the full extent of exerkine-mediated endocrine effects (i.e., magnitude and target tissue specificity) and the broader exercise-stimulated remodeling of the inter-organ endocrine network remain inadequately understood. Methodological limitations have hampered progress in addressing these research questions.

To address the gap in research capability for exerkine discovery, we employed Quantitative Endocrine Network Interaction Estimation (QENIE) [7,8], a systems genetics approach that leverages gene-to-gene correlations across tissue pairs, which has been successfully implemented to identify novel tissue crosstalk factors [7,9,10]. QENIE assigns a secretome score (Ssec) to each known secreted feature within a given origin-target tissue pair, providing a quantitative estimate of its endocrine impact. Additionally, we recently developed Gene-Derived Correlations Across Tissues (GD-CAT) [11], a bioinformatics pipeline that identifies enriched biological pathways in target tissue genes that are transcriptionally correlated with a gene of interest in a source tissue. This approach allows us to infer biological pathways in the target tissue that may be modulated by the endocrine action of the origin tissue gene.

The Molecular Transducers of Physical Activity Consortium (MoTrPAC) recently reported temporal multi-omic adaptations in response to eight weeks of endurance training intervention across multiple solid tissues in male and female rats—representing the most comprehensive preclinical exercise training study to date [12,13]. Leveraging multi-organ transcriptomics and proteomics data from the MoTrPAC rat endurance training study, combined with the robust analytical power of QENIE and GD-CAT, we aimed to quantify endurance training-induced inter-organ endocrine networks and identify novel secreted factors mediating tissue crosstalk. We hypothesized that QENIE and GD-CAT would recapitulate well-established endocrine interactions known to be impacted by exercise (e.g., increased hypothalamic sensitivity in response to adipose tissue-released leptin). Additionally, we predicted that trained rats would exhibit distinct inter-organ endocrine networks compared with sedentary control rats, reflecting systemic adaptations to daily treadmill running.

2. Results

2.1. Application of QENIE and GD-CAT

We first evaluated whether inter-tissue transcriptomic correlations in MoTrPAC rats primarily reflected shared biological processes across tissues, rather than direct tissue-to-tissue regulatory interactions. We performed Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) on 16 tissues (ovary and testis were excluded due to limited sample sizes) using all available samples from an exercise timecourse intervention from 1 to 8 weeks (5 males and 5 females for each training group; 1-week, TR1W; 2-week, TR2W; 4-week, TR4W; 8-week, TR8W; 8-week untrained control, Control; total 50 samples per tissue), resulting in 203 unique tissue-specific gene modules (see ‘WGCNA’ in Methods). Correlations between module eigengenes revealed several significant inter-tissue relationships (Supplementary Fig. 1A). However, overrepresentation analysis showed that even highly correlated modules were often enriched for distinct biological pathways (Supplementary Fig. 1A). To determine whether functional similarity explained module correlations, we calculated Jaccard indices based on overlapping significant Gene Ontology (GO) terms between modules. The resulting similarity pattern (Supplementary Fig. 1B) did not mirror the eigengene correlation structure, suggesting that inter-tissue transcriptomic correlations were not driven by common pathway enrichment. Moreover, genes encoding secretory proteins—defined using the UniProt secretome database [14]—were broadly distributed across modules and tissues, with no clear clustering of secretory content in a specific module or tissue (Supplementary Fig. 1A). These findings suggest that the observed inter-tissue transcriptomic correlations are unlikely to be explained by shared biological pathways across tissues alone.

The workflow and implementation of QENIE [7] are outlined in Figure 1A. QENIE operates under the assumption that if the expression of a gene encoding a secreted protein in the origin tissue correlates with gene expression patterns in a target tissue, that gene may mediate inter-tissue communication between the two [7,9]. Therefore, the first step is to correlate gene expression matrices between the two tissues. Biweight midcorrelation [15] was performed between the gene matrix from the origin tissue and the target tissue. From the resulting p-value matrix, secretory protein-coding transcripts in the origin tissue were selected (see QENIE in Methods), yielding a varied number of secretory protein-coding transcripts per origin tissue (Figure 1B). The secretome score (Ssec) for each origin transcript was then calculated as the sum of -log(p-value) for its correlations with all target tissue transcripts. Therefore, Ssec quantifies the potential endocrine effect of a given transcript on its target tissue, with higher Ssec values indicating a greater likelihood that the transcript functions as an endocrine factor. QENIE was applied across all possible gene-to-gene correlations of origin-target tissue pairs. Ssec values were also calculated from protein-to-protein correlations in seven of the 16 available tissues, producing 1,525 unique Ssec datasets, including matched origin-target pairs (i.e., auto/paracrine actions) (Figure 1A). The number of filtered secretory features averaged 812 ± 78 for transcripts and 475 ± 88 for proteins across origin tissues (Figure 1B). Notably, the extent of differential regulation in response to 8 weeks of endurance training (FDR <0.05; available here: https://motrpac-data.org/search) of secretory features varied widely across tissues. For example, 44% (351 out of 793) of secretory protein-coding transcripts in the adrenal gland were differentially regulated by endurance training, whereas only 0.001% of secretory protein-coding transcripts in the hypothalamus exhibited training-induced changes (Figure 1B). At the protein level, 90 secretory proteins in subcutaneous white adipose tissue (scWAT) were differentially regulated by exercise, while only 1 secretory protein in the cerebral cortex was altered following exercise intervention compared with sedentary control (Figure 1B). The raw abundance of secretory features was also partly tissue-dependent (Supplementary Fig. 2A and B).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Workflow of QENIE and validation of physiological relevance of Ssec. A) Schematic representation of the QENIE workflow and its implementation. B) Number of secretory protein-coding transcripts and proteins identified in each origin tissue after secretome filtering. White bars and numbers within the colored bars indicate the count of secretory-protein coding transcripts or secretory proteins that were significantly different between Control and TR8W. CON, Control; TR, Training. C) Ssec of Lep (WAT-SC-to-HYPOTH) across groups. Fgsea results of HYPOTH transcripts correlating with WAT-SC-Lep across groups are shown. D) Ssec of Il15 (SKM-GN-to-WAT-SC) across groups. Fgsea results of WAT-SC transcripts correlating with SKM-GN-Il15 across groups are shown. E) Ssec of TGF-β2 (WAT-SC-to-WAT-SC) across groups. Fgsea results of WAT-SC proteins correlating with WAT-SC- TGF-β2 across groups are shown. QENIE, Quantitative Endocrine Network Interaction Estimation; Ssec, Secretome score; ADRNL, Adrenal gland; BAT, brown adipose tissue; COLON, colon; CORTEX, cerebral cortex; HEART, heart; HIPPOC, hippocampus; HYPOTH, hypothalamus; KIDNEY, kidney; LIVER, liver; LUNG, lung; PLASMA, plasma; SKM-GN, gastrocnemius (skeletal muscle); SKM-VL, vastus lateralis (skeletal muscle); SMLINT, small intestine; SPLEEN, spleen; VENACV, vena cava; WAT-SC, subcutaneous white adipose tissue. TR, Training; GOBP, Gene Ontology Biological Process; GOCC, Gene Ontology Cellular Component; GOMF, Gene Ontology Molecular Function; NES, Normalized Enrichment Score; BH, Benjamini-Hochberg.

To assess the physiological relevance of Ssec, we examined well-established tissue crosstalk factors that are modulated by exercise: leptin (Lep), IL15 (Il15), and TGF-β2 [3,16]. Leptin, a hormone predominantly secreted by scWAT (Supplementary Fig. 2A), plays a critical role in regulating energy homeostasis, with exercise training known to enhance hypothalamic sensitivity to leptin [17,18]. Ssec of Lep (scWAT-to-hypothalamus) increased progressively throughout training, with the most pronounced difference observed between 8-week trained and control rats (Figure 1C). To infer the potential biological effects of scWAT-derived leptin in the hypothalamus, we applied Gene-Derived Correlation Across Tissue (GD-CAT), a method that performs gene set enrichment analysis on transcripts in the target tissue (here, hypothalamus) that correlate with a specific gene in the origin tissue (here, leptin (LEP) in scWAT) [11]. While scWAT-Lep was associated with downregulated extracellular matrix (ECM) pathways in the hypothalamus across both groups, it was uniquely correlated with upregulated neuronal synapse and homeostasis, and neurotransmitter receptor complex in the hypothalamus of 8-week trained rats, supporting the notion that endurance training may contribute to enhanced synaptic plasticity of the hypothalamus (adjusted p < 0.05, Figure 1C). IL15 is a well-characterized exercise-inducible myokine that promotes triglyceride breakdown (i.e., lipolysis) and fatty acid oxidation in adipose tissue [19,20]. Compared with the Control, Ssec of Il15 (gastrocnemius-to-scWAT) was over four-fold higher in 8-week trained rats (Figure 1D). Additionally, genes in scWAT that correlated with gastrocnemius-Il15 in 8-week trained rats exhibited a significant upregulation of lipid catabolism and oxidation, an effect absent in control rats, aligning with the known role of IL15 in regulating adipose tissue energy metabolism (adjusted p < 0.05, Figure 1D). TGF-β2, an adipokine reported to be induced by exercise, improves adipose tissue metabolism and reduces inflammation [21]. Ssec of TGF-β2 protein (scWAT-to-scWAT) increased with training (Figure 1E), and GD-CAT analysis revealed that scWAT-TGF-β2 was generally associated with upregulated mitochondrial metabolism and reduced inflammatory signaling in scWAT regardless of training state (Figure 1E). However, some pathways were differentially enriched between Control vs. 8-week trained rats, including the upregulation of acetyl-CoA biosynthesis and the downregulation of acute inflammatory response in 8-week trained rats (Figure 1E). Collectively, our in silico observations from QENIE and GD-CAT analyses support the known endocrine roles of selected exercise-stimulated features and expand our understanding of the role of endurance training in remodeling the endocrine network.

2.2. Endurance training alters Ssec ranks and distribution

To assess the overall endocrine contribution of each origin tissue, we ranked tissues based on median Ssec from gene-to-gene correlations. Notably, vena cava exhibited the highest median Ssec at 1-week and 2-week training, but by 4-week and 8-week training, scWAT emerged as the top-ranked origin tissue (Supplementary Fig. 3A). Mean Ssec was significantly different in 187 out of 256 gene-to-gene origin-target pairs and 32 out of 49 protein-to-protein pairs between 8-week trained and control rats (adjusted p < 0.05, Supplementary Fig. 3B and C). To determine the impact of endurance training on Ssec ranking and distribution of individual secretory features, we performed Wilcoxon signed-rank tests combined with rank sum effect sizes. In gene-to-gene correlations, 186 origin-target pairs exhibited significantly different Ssec ranks between 8-week trained and control rats (adjusted p < 0.05, Figure 2A,B), with scWAT-to-vastus lateralis showing the highest significance and effect size. These findings indicate that adipose-to-skeletal muscle crosstalk was most differentially regulated by training (Figure 2A). Several scWAT-to-tissue connections, such as scWAT-to-brown adipose tissue (BAT) and scWAT-to-hypothalamus, were also among the top-ranked interactions, suggesting that scWAT may be a primary endocrine tissue highly influenced by endurance training (Figure 2A). Ssec distributions were markedly skewed toward higher Ssec in scWAT transcripts in 8-week trained vs. control rats, further supporting this finding (Supplementary Fig. 4A). Given the significant sexual dimorphism observed in scWAT adaptations in this cohort [13], we conducted additional QENIE analyses focused on origin-target pairs with scWAT as the origin tissue, adjusting for sex. These analyses revealed sex effects across many tissue pairs (Supplementary Fig. 4B); however, the majority of exercise-induced effects on scWAT remained significant despite the influence of sex (Supplementary Fig. 4C). In contrast, small intestine-to-vastus lateralis, small intestine-to-colon, and vena cava-to-hippocampus exhibited skewed distributions toward lower Ssec in 8-week trained rats, suggesting a diminished endocrine link after training (Supplementary Fig. 4D). Among matched origin-target pairs, small intestine and hypothalamus were most differentially regulated, with both exhibiting a shift towards higher Ssec in 8-week trained vs. control rats (Supplementary Fig. 4E).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Ssec rank difference in Control vs. TR8W. A) Volcano plot showing results of Wilcoxon signed-rank test comparing gene-to-gene Ssec rank differences between Control and TR8W. B) Network plot showing significantly different Ssec ranking in origin-target pairs in Control vs. TR8W. Red arrows represent significant difference (adjusted p < 0.05). C) Volcano plot showing results of Wilcoxon signed-rank test comparing protein-to-protein Ssec rank differences between Control and TR8W. Significant (adjusted p < 0.05) origin-target pairs are highlighted in black. Color-coded padded boxes represent different origin tissues. Matched origin-target pairs (e.g., CORTEX→CORTEX) are excluded from A and B but were included in the statistical testing.

For protein-to-protein correlations, 31 out of 49 origin-target pairs showed significantly different Ssec ranks between 8-week trained and control rats, with lung-to-cerebral cortex and gastrocnemius-to-heart being the most differentially regulated connections (Figure 2C). scWAT and gastrocnemius were also among the most differentially regulated matched origin-target pairs, suggestive of differential autocrine actions by endurance training (Supplementary Fig. 4E–G).

2.3. Global and tissue-specific Ssec changes by endurance training

Given the marked differences observed in gene-to-gene and protein-to-protein correlation networks between 8-week trained and control rats, we examined the most differentially ranked secretory protein-coding transcripts that were globally expressed across all 16 tissues. Among 524 globally expressed transcripts, the top 20 with the greatest Ssec rank differences between 8-week trained and control rats included Adamts3, Adamtsl4, Cd9, Col12a1, Adamts4, Ctss, Endou, Fstl3, Tsku, Calr, Reln, Klkb1, Egfl7, Fam3a, Itgbl1, Mbp, Rarres2, Gpi, Lgals3, and Loxl2 (Supplementary Fig. 5A). Notably, many of these transcripts exhibited tissue-specific differential regulation in response to training (FDR<0.05, Supplementary Fig. 5B). Several of these transcripts were involved in ECM construction and remodeling, including Adamts3, Adamtsl4, Col12a1, Endou, and Loxl2, all of which exhibited significant differences in average Ssec between TR8W and Control (all p < 0.05, Figure 3A).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Top secretory-protein coding transcripts with the largest Ssec rank difference in Control vs. TR8W. A) Bar plots displaying the results of a paired t-test comparing Ssec values between Control and TR8W for the top 20 global transcripts exhibiting the largest Ssec rank differences between the two groups. B) Top 15 transcripts exhibiting the largest Ssec rank difference between the Control and TR8W for WAT-SC-to-SKM-VL, WAT-SC-to-HYPOTH, VENACV-to-HIPPOC, LUNG-to-CORTEX, and SKM-GN-to-HEART. Extracellular score (range: 0–5) obtained from COMPARTMENTS is shown in green numeric next to each feature. Pink triangles represent Ssec ranks in Control, and dark green circles represent Ssec ranks in TR8W. Features highlighted in subsequent figures are colored in red. C) Fgsea results of SKM-VL transcripts correlating with WAT-SC-Sfrp4 across groups. D) Fgsea results of HYPOTH transcripts correlating with WAT-SC-Wnt4 and WAT-SC-Ccn4 across groups. E) Fgsea results of HIPPOC transcripts correlating with VENACV-Wnt7b, VENACV-Wnt16, and VENACV-Mdk across groups. FFgsea results of CORTEX proteins correlating with LUNG-Wif1 across groups.

We then examined secretory protein-coding features that displayed substantial Ssec rank differences at the individual tissue level, focusing on top-ranked features with the largest shifts between 8-week trained and control rats across key origin-target tissue pairs. Additionally, we mapped an “extracellular score” (range: 0–5, with higher scores indicating higher secretion probability) for each feature using COMPARTMENTS [22], a subcellular localization database (see ‘Extracellular score’ in Methods) (Figure 3B). In the scWAT-to-hypothalamus connection, Gdf10 (growth differentiation factor 10, extracellular score: 5) exhibited a dramatic difference in Ssec rank, rising from 880th in Control to 6th in 8-week trained rats (Figure 3B). GD-CAT analysis revealed that scWAT-Gdf10 was associated with reduced ECM collagen abundance and cytoskeletal remodeling in the hypothalamus of 8-week trained rats, effects absent in control rats (adjusted p < 0.05, Supplementary Fig. 5C). In protein-to-protein correlations, Granulin (Grn, extracellular score: 4.7), a muscle growth regulator [23], increased in Ssec rank from 274th in Control to 3rd in 8-week trained rats in the gastrocnemius-to-heart connection (Figure 3B). GD-CAT linked gastrocnemius-derived Grn to enhanced amino acid metabolism and reduced RNA splicing in the heart of 8-week trained rats, an effect not observed in gastrocnemius-to-heart of control rats (adjusted p < 0.05, Supplementary Fig. 5D).

Among scWAT-to-vastus lateralis, scWAT-to-hypothalamus, vena cava-to-hippocampus, and lung-to-cortex, Wnt signaling factors (Sfrp4, Wnt4, Ccn4, Wnt7b, Wnt16, Mdk, Wif1), exhibited large Ssec rank shifts in 8-week trained vs. control rats (Figure 3B). Wnt signaling, an essential development pathway mediated by secreted Wnt family ligands [24], is known to exert tissue-specific regulatory effects [25,26]. Sfrp4 (Secreted Frizzled-Related Protein 4), a Wnt signaling modulator, showed a positive shift in Ssec rank in scWAT-to-vastus lateralis from control to 8-week trained rats (Figure 3B). GD-CAT linked scWAT-Sfrp4 to increased mitochondrial metabolism in the vastus lateralis of 8-week trained rats, while it was associated with upregulated immune cell activation pathways in control rats (adjusted p < 0.05, Figure 3C). Interestingly, although Sfrp4 expression in scWAT was significantly downregulated with training (FDR = 9.6e-8), its Ssec rank increased, suggesting that lower Sfrp4 expression may enhance its relative endocrine influence on vastus lateralis during training. Our observation of upregulated mitochondrial metabolism in the vastus lateralis with reduced scWAT-Sfrp4 aligns with previous findings that Sfrp4 treatment of myotubes blunts mitochondrial respiration [27].

In the scWAT-to-hypothalamus connection, both Wnt4 (extracellular score: 4.7) and Ccn4 (extracellular score: 4.4) exhibited higher Ssec ranks in 8-week trained rats than control rats (Figure 3B), correlating with enhanced mitochondrial metabolism, synaptic activity, and action potential regulation in the hypothalamus (adjusted p < 0.05, Figure 3D). In the vena cava-to-hippocampus connection, Wnt7b (extracellular score: 5) and Wnt16 (extracellular score: 4.6) were among the most highly ranked secretory transcripts in 8-week trained rats compared with control rats (Figure 3B). Wnt7b was linked to enhanced neurotransmitter secretion, while Wnt16 was associated with upregulated Purkinje cell development and neurotransmitter exocytosis in the hippocampus, effects absent in control rats (adjusted p < 0.05, Figure 3E). In contrast, Mdk (Midkine, extracellular score: 4.2), a negative Wnt regulator, exhibited a large negative Ssec shift in 8-week trained rats, suggesting a weakened endocrine role (Figure 3B). Vena cava-derived Mdk was associated with ECM accumulation in both 8-week trained and control rats, but correlated with suppressed actin polymerization terms only in control rats (adjusted p < 0.05, Figure 3E), suggesting that training may have attenuated the inhibitory effects of Mdk on cytoskeleton remodeling. At the protein level, Wif1 (Wnt Inhibitory Factor 1, extracellular score: 5) exhibited the largest negative Ssec rank shift in lung-to-cerebral cortex, with a marked reduction in 8-week trained rats (Figure 3B). In the cerebral cortex, lung-derived Wif1 was linked to axonal growth in 8-week trained rats, while in control rats, it was associated with inflammation and ECM accumulation (adjusted p < 0.05, Figure 3F). These findings suggest that exercise training may attenuate lung-derived Wif1's endocrine role, potentially reducing neuroinflammatory pathways in the brain.

Because exercise training has been reported to upregulate Wnt signaling in the brain [28,29], we investigated whether the observed training-induced inter-organ communication was a secondary effect of autocrine or paracrine Wnt signaling within the brain. Interestingly, Wnt connections within the hypothalamus and hippocampus (autocrine/paracrine signaling) often showed biological pathway associations that differed markedly—and in some cases, were opposite—from those inferred through distant endocrine connections. For instance, hypothalamic-derived Wnt4 and Ccn4 were negatively associated with action potential and synaptic activity in the hypothalamus (adjusted p < 0.05, Supplementary Fig. 6A). Notably, Ccn4 exhibited a dramatic drop in Ssec rank, falling from 8th in Control to 615th in 8-week trained rats, suggesting that its role in intra-hypothalamic signaling may have diminished following training. Furthermore, hippocampus-derived Ccn4 showed no significant pathway enrichment in the hippocampus-to-hypothalamus connection (Supplementary Fig. 6A). Similarly, while hippocampus-derived Wnt7b was associated with upregulated synapse signaling in 8-week trained rats, this effect was already significant in control rats (Supplementary Fig. 6B), indicating that local Wnt7b may not be part of the hippocampal synaptic remodeling differentially induced by exercise training. These findings suggest that endocrine Wnt signaling across distant tissues may not be a secondary consequence of autocrine or paracrine Wnt signaling within the brain.

2.4. Secretory Wnt factors as central mediators of training-induced endocrine remodeling

Given the strong involvement of Wnt factors in training-induced endocrine remodeling, we systematically assessed positive, negative, and dual (i.e., known to be involved in both positive and negative regulation) Wnt regulators, comparing their average Ssec ranks between 8-week trained and control rats (see “Curation of secretory Wnt Signaling List” in Methods). Wnt signaling exhibited tissue- and directionality-specific adaptations in response to daily treadmill running (Figure 4A). For example, for positive Wnt regulators, BAT, heart, and adrenal gland showed the highest average Ssec difference (TR8W - Control) when acting as origin tissues toward scWAT, suggesting these tissues may be especially responsive to endurance training in signaling to scWAT through positive Wnt pathways (Figure 4A). While training only modestly increased hypothalamic-targeting Wnt signaling from most origin tissues in general, hypothalamic-originating Wnt factors displayed a different trend, with negative Wnt regulators being more prominent in hypothalamus-to-peripheral circuits (Figure 4A). Assessing individual Wnt factors, Rspo1 (R-Spondin 1; extracellular score: 4.7), a positive Wnt regulator, showed higher Ssec in most target tissues post-training (Figure 4B). The top 10 origin-target pairs with the greatest Ssec rank differences for Rspo1 were all upregulated in 8-week trained rats, with spleen-to-key metabolic tissues — liver, adrenal gland, kidney, and scWAT — among the most prominent connections (Figure 4C). Wnt3a exhibited a distinct pattern, with its Ssec increasing across most target tissues following training, and vena cava emerging as a major origin tissue at 8 weeks of training (Figure 4B). Nine of the top 10 Wnt3a connections originated from vena cava, suggesting the circulatory system as a key Wnt3a source in response to endurance training (Figure 4C). Conversely, negative Wnt regulators such as Nog (Noggin) and Mdk exhibited reduced Ssec ranks in 8-week trained rats, suggesting a weaker endocrine role post-training (Figure 4C). Our findings suggest that Wnt signaling is associated with endurance training-induced endocrine remodeling, including metabolic adaptations in peripheral organs (e.g., skeletal muscle; Figure 3C) and neuroprotective mechanisms in the brain (Figure 3D–F). Positive Wnt signaling has been implicated in synaptic plasticity and neuroprotection, with its upregulation linked to protection against neuroinflammation and cognitive decline [30,31]. While these Wnt factors are confirmed to be extracellular and likely secreted, whether they cross the blood–brain barrier remains unknown. However, Wnt proteins can be secreted via exosomes [26], providing a potential mechanism for peripheral-to-brain signaling.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Feature- and tissue-specific remodeling of Wnt network by exercise training. A) Heatmaps displaying the average difference in Ssec (TR8W – Control) for positive, negative, and dual regulators of Wnt signaling. We curated 13 positive, 19 negative, and 8 dual-role Wnt transcripts from the Gene Ontology database (see “Curation of secretory Wnt signaling lists” in Methods). To assess the effect of endurance training on Wnt signaling for each origin-target tissue pair, we calculated the difference in Ssec between TR8W and Control. Ssec differences were z-scaled and averaged within each Wnt group (positive, negative, dual). Green shading indicates an overall increase in training-induced signaling, while pink indicates a reduction. Rows represent origin tissues, and columns represent target tissues. B) Heatmaps illustrating the average difference in Ssec (TR8W – Control) for secretory Wnt factors, summarized by origin and target tissues. Each Ssec difference was z-scaled before averaging across origin or target tissues. C) Bar graphs showing the normalized Ssec rank difference between TR8W and Control for the top 10 origin-target tissue pairs with the largest rank differences for Rspo1, Wnt3a, Nog, and Mdk. Normalized rank difference was calculated by dividing the absolute Ssec rank difference between TR8W and Control by the total number of secretory genes in the origin tissue. The normalized rank difference ranges from 0 to <1. Dark bars indicate a higher rank in TR8W, while pink bars indicate a higher rank in Control.

3. Discussion

In this study, we leveraged an extensive dataset of transcriptomics and proteomics in 16 solid organs to interrogate inter-organ, gene-to-gene, and protein-to-protein correlations spanning more than 1,500 origin-target tissue pairs in a rigorously controlled preclinical endurance training model, Fisher 344 rat. Through the application of advanced systems genetics analytical approaches—QENIE [7,8] and GD-CAT [11]—we quantified endurance training-induced adaptations in endocrine networks and inferred potential biological pathways that may be modulated by secretory features delivering, in part, health-related benefits of daily physical activity.

Our findings demonstrate that in silico estimations of crosstalk strength and endocrine responses align with well-established exercise-induced adaptations, such as leptin and IL-15 signaling, underscoring the validity of our approach. We provide evidence that endurance training induces extensive remodeling of endocrine networks, altering both overall inter-organ crosstalk strength and the individual contributions of specific secretory factors on tissue–selective pathways. Additionally, by meticulously filtering for known secretomes and inspecting their subcellular localization, we identified potential key secretory features that were most impacted by training in an origin-target-specific manner, particularly the involvement of Wnt signaling factors in brain physiology, offering a valuable resource for future mechanistic validation studies of novel and known exerkines. Importantly, this work expands our current understanding of the exerkine network by presenting a multi-tissue endocrine atlas that highlights potential mediators of exercise-induced tissue adaptations that are currently undiscovered.

Despite the unprecedented resolution of endocrine network adaptations provided by our study, several important limitations should be noted. As a correlation-based analysis, our approach cannot definitively establish causal relationships or exclude the possibility that observed Ssec changes reflect parallel exercise adaptations in both origin and target tissues, rather than direct endocrine signaling. Therefore, follow-up mechanistic studies are required to validate the functional roles of candidate secretory factors. While our well-controlled training model allowed for precise assessment of training effects on endocrine networks, the relative homogeneity of rats within each group may have limited biological diversity. For example, IL-6, one of the most studied exerkines, was only detected in a limited number of tissues (spleen and scWAT), restricting our ability to assess its systemic endocrine effects. Although the rigorous study design of MoTrPAC enabled profiling of the temporal dynamics of endocrine networks during training (i.e., 1–4 weeks), interpretation of these temporal changes should be made cautiously due to the absence of untrained control groups at intermediate time points. Another important aspect of our study is that the endurance training-induced secretory factors we identified may not be acutely regulated—either induced or suppressed—by a single session of exercise. This is because tissue samples were collected after a 48-hour ‘washout’ period following the final exercise bout. Integrating molecular responses from acute exercise sessions in the same tissues will be critical to distinguish immediate versus cumulative effects of training and to better understand the temporal dynamics of tissue crosstalk. Lastly, although our systems genetics analyses enabled the discovery of exercise-induced remodeling of the endocrine network through intra-omic correlations within transcriptomics and proteomics, future work is warranted to extend these analyses across omic layers (e.g., transcriptomics-proteomics, metabolomics-transcriptomics), which may reveal additional, novel endocrine signals regulated by exercise.

Collectively, our integrated systems genetics approach using QENIE and GD-CAT revealed that endurance training drives widespread remodeling of inter-organ endocrine communication. By capturing both the strength and specificity of cross-tissue secretory relationships, we uncovered novel candidate endocrine factors and biological pathways that may underlie systemic adaptations to chronic exercise. These findings offer a foundational endocrine interaction map—linking molecular signals from origin to target tissues—that both confirms known biology and proposes new axes of crosstalk for mechanistic investigation. This resource provides a framework for future studies aiming to unravel how exercise-induced secreted factors orchestrate whole-body physiological adaptations.

4. Methods

4.1. Molecular Transducers of Physical Activity Consortium (MoTrPAC) rat endurance training study

A detailed description of the endurance training, biochemical analyses, and differential analysis is available here [12]. Briefly, six-month-old male and female Fischer 344 rats underwent progressive treadmill-based endurance training for 1, 2, 4, or 8 weeks (n = 10 for each group; TR1W, TR2W, TR4W, TR8W). Tissues were collected 48 h after the final exercise session. Age- and sex-matched sedentary rats served as untrained controls (n = 10), whose tissue collection was synchronized with the 8-week training group. All normalized quality-controlled transcriptomics and proteomics datasets and differential analysis results were acquired using the MotrpacRatTraining6moData R package (https://github.com/MoTrPAC/MotrpacRatTraining6moData).

4.2. Quantitative Endocrine Network Interaction Estimation (QENIE)

A detailed description of the original method is available here [7]. Gene-to-gene and protein-to-protein biweight midcorrelation was performed on all possible tissue pairs per training condition. Resulting p-value matrices were filtered for known secreted proteins using the Uniprot rat secretome database (n = 1321 unique features). The secretome score (Ssec) was calculated as the sum of -log(p-value) for a given secretory feature in the origin tissue, correlating with all features in the target tissue. The sum was divided by the number of features in the target tissue for scaling. To account for sex differences in tissue gene expression, we applied an additional QENIE analysis limited to origin–target tissue pairs involving subcutaneous white adipose tissue (scWAT). For each gene expression matrix (origin and target tissues), we regressed out sex using a linear model (expression ∼ sex), and the residuals from this model were used as input for the biweight midcorrelation analysis. These residualized matrices allowed us to compute a sex-adjusted Ssec, using the same QENIE framework as in the primary analysis.

4.3. Gene derived correlation across tissues (GD-CAT)

From the biweight correlation between a given secretory feature and all target tissue features, target tissue features were ranked by the bicor value. Fast Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (fgsea R package [32]) was conducted on the ranked features to test for enriched biological pathways. TMsig R package [33] was used for fgsea visualization. Benjamini-Hoechberg multiple correction was applied and terms with BH-adjusted p < 0.05 were considered significant.

4.4. Weighted gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA)

4.4.1. Module construction and intercorrelation

WGCNA was used to identify distinct, non-overlapping gene clusters (“modules”) within each tissue transcriptomics matrix. Feature connectivity was calculated by summing correlation strengths with all other features across concatenated sample groups (n = 50). A scale-free, signed network was constructed using the lowest soft-thresholding power β that achieved scale-free topology (R2 > 0.85). Modules were defined using a dynamic tree-cutting algorithm with a merging threshold of 0.3, applied uniformly across all tissues. Module eigengenes (MEs), representing the first principal component of each module, were extracted and pairwise inter-module correlations were computed using biweight midcorrelation. P-values were adjusted for multiple testing using the Benjamini–Hochberg method.

4.4.2. Overrepresentation analysis (ORA)

For biological interpretation, ORA was performed on each module using the hypeR package, with Gene Ontology (GO) as the reference database. GO terms with FDR <0.05 were retained and grouped into general biological themes based on keyword matching:

  • Translation (ribosom|translation|translational)

  • Mitochondria/OxPhos (mitochond|respirat|oxidative)

  • Immune (immune|inflamm|interferon|cytokine|antigen)

  • Neuronal (synapse|axon|neuron|neurotransmitter|dendrite|neurogenesis)

  • Cell Cycle (cell cycle|mitotic|division|proliferation)

  • RNA Processing (rna|splic|processing|mrna)

  • Lipid Metabolism (lipid|fatty|cholesterol|adipose|lipoprotein)

  • Glucose Metabolism (glucose|glycolysis|gluconeogenesis)

  • Development (development|morphogen|patterning|organ morphogenesis)

  • Apoptosis (apoptosis|cell death|programmed cell)

  • Autophagy/Degradation (autophagy|lysosome|degradation)

  • Epigenetic Regulation (nucleus|chromatin|epigenetic|histone|methylation|acetylation)

  • Signal Transduction (signal transduction|receptor|mapk|akt|signaling pathway)

  • ECM/Adhesion (extracellular matrix|ecm|adhesion|integrin)

  • Hormone Signaling (hormone|steroid|androgen|estrogen)

For each broad category, the GO term with the highest –log(FDR) was selected as representative. The similarity between modules was quantified using the Jaccard index, calculated as the ratio of overlapping significant GO terms to the total number of union terms between modules.

4.5. Extracellular score

Rat-specific subcellular localization data were obtained from COMPARTMENTS [22], which provides four annotations for extracellular localization: “extracellular region,” “extracellular space,” “extracellular exosome,” and “extracellular vesicle.” Each annotation is assigned a score ranging from 0 to 5, with higher values indicating a greater probability of extracellular localization. For each secretory gene identified through the QENIE pipeline, the highest score among these four extracellular annotations was selected as the “Extracellular Score.”

4.6. Curation of secretory Wnt signaling lists

Gene sets for “Positive regulation of Wnt signaling pathway” (GO:0030177) and “Negative regulation of Wnt signaling pathway” (GO:0030178) were obtained from the Gene Ontology database. Both sets were filtered to retain only genes identified in the QENIE pipeline with an extracellular score greater than 4. Genes that appeared in both lists were categorized as “dual regulators,” while exclusive positive and negative regulators were curated by removing these overlapping genes from their respective lists. This process resulted in 13 positive regulators, 19 negative regulators, and 8 dual regulators.

4.7. Statistics

Paired T-test was used to compare the average Ssec between TR8W and Control for selected secretory features. Wilcoxon signed rank test was performed to test Ssec rank difference between TR8W and Control for a given origin-target tissue pair. Effect size r was calculated from rank sum test (r = Z/N) where Z refers to the z-score from the Wilcoxon test and N is the total number of observations. Benjamini-Hoechberg multiple correction was applied. All statistical analyses were conducted through R.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Cheehoon Ahn: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. Andrea L. Hevener: Writing – review & editing, Supervision. Laurie J. Goodyear: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, Data curation. Sue C. Bodine: Writing – review & editing, Supervision. Karyn A. Esser: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, Data curation. Marcus M. Seldin: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Methodology, Conceptualization. Lauren M. Sparks: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, Conceptualization.

Code availability

Codes used in this manuscript to perform WGCNA, QENIE, and GD-CAT are hosted on GitHub (https://github.com/ahnchi/MoTrPAC-PASS1B-QENIE).

Declaration of competing interest

Authors declare no competing interests.

Acknowledgement

The MoTrPAC Study is supported by NIH grants U01AG055135, U01AR071158, U01AG055137, U01AR071130, U01AR071133.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmet.2025.102219.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following are the Supplementary data to this article:

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.pdf (4.2MB, pdf)
Multimedia component 2
mmc2.pdf (1.3MB, pdf)
Multimedia component 3
mmc3.pdf (7.9MB, pdf)
Multimedia component 4
mmc4.pdf (3.4MB, pdf)
Multimedia component 5
mmc5.pdf (1.9MB, pdf)
Multimedia component 6
mmc6.pdf (1MB, pdf)

Data availability

Data and code repository address is included in the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Ruegsegger G.N., Booth F.W. Health benefits of exercise. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2018;8(7) doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a029694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Heinonen I., Kalliokoski K.K., Hannukainen J.C., Duncker D.J., Nuutila P., Knuuti J. Organ-specific physiological responses to acute physical exercise and long-term training in humans. Physiology. 2014;29(6):421–436. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00067.2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chow L.S., Gerszten R.E., Taylor J.M., Pedersen B.K., van Praag H., Trappe S., et al. Exerkines in health, resilience and disease. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2022;18(5):273–289. doi: 10.1038/s41574-022-00641-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hackney A.C., Lane A.R. Exercise and the regulation of endocrine hormones. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2015;135:293–311. doi: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2015.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wei W., Riley N.M., Lyu X., Shen X., Guo J., Raun S.H., et al. Organism-wide, cell-type-specific secretome mapping of exercise training in mice. Cell Metab. 2023;35(7):1261–1279 e11. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2023.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sato S., Dyar K.A., Treebak J.T., Jepsen S.L., Ehrlich A.M., Ashcroft S.P., et al. Atlas of exercise metabolism reveals time-dependent signatures of metabolic homeostasis. Cell Metab. 2022;34(2):329–345 e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2021.12.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Seldin M.M., Koplev S., Rajbhandari P., Vergnes L., Rosenberg G.M., Meng Y., et al. A strategy for discovery of endocrine interactions with application to whole-body metabolism. Cell Metab. 2018;27(5):1138–11355 e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.03.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Seldin M.M., Lusis A.J. Systems-based approaches for investigation of inter-tissue communication. J Lipid Res. 2019;60(3):450–455. doi: 10.1194/jlr.S090316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cao Y., Wang Y., Zhou Z., Pan C., Jiang L., Zhou Z., et al. Liver-heart cross-talk mediated by coagulation factor XI protects against heart failure. Science. 2022;377(6613):1399–1406. doi: 10.1126/science.abn0910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Strocchi S., Liu L., Wang R., Haseli S.P., Capone F., Bode D., et al. Systems biology approach uncovers candidates for liver-heart interorgan crosstalk in HFpEF. Circ Res. 2024;135(8):873–876. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.124.324829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhou M., Tamburini I., Van C., Molendijk J., Nguyen C.M., Chang I.Y., et al. Leveraging inter-individual transcriptional correlation structure to infer discrete signaling mechanisms across metabolic tissues. eLife. 2024;12 doi: 10.7554/eLife.88863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.MoTr P.A.C.S.G., Lead A., MoTr P.A.C.S.G. Temporal dynamics of the multi-omic response to endurance exercise training. Nature. 2024;629(8010):174–183. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06877-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Many G.M., Sanford J.A., Sagendorf T.J., Hou Z., Nigro P., Whytock K.L., et al. Sexual dimorphism and the multi-omic response to exercise training in rat subcutaneous white adipose tissue. Nat Metab. 2024;6(5):963–979. doi: 10.1038/s42255-023-00959-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.UniProt C. UniProt: a hub for protein information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(Database issue):D204–D212. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Langfelder P., Horvath S. Fast R functions for robust correlations and hierarchical clustering. J Stat Software. 2012;46(11) [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kraemer R.R., Chu H., Castracane V.D. Leptin and exercise. Exp Biol Med. 2002;227(9):701–708. doi: 10.1177/153537020222700903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhao J., Tian Y., Xu J., Liu D., Wang X., Zhao B. Endurance exercise is a leptin signaling mimetic in hypothalamus of wistar rats. Lipids Health Dis. 2011;10:1–7. doi: 10.1186/1476-511X-10-225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kang S., Kim K.B., Shin K.O. Exercise training improve leptin sensitivity in peripheral tissue of obese rats. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013;435(3):454–459. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Quinn L.S., Anderson B.G., Strait-Bodey L., Stroud A.M., Argiles J.M. Oversecretion of interleukin-15 from skeletal muscle reduces adiposity. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2009;296(1):E191–E202. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.90506.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Quinn L.S., Strait-Bodey L., Anderson B.G., Argiles J.M., Havel P.J. Interleukin-15 stimulates adiponectin secretion by 3T3-L1 adipocytes: evidence for a skeletal muscle-to-fat signaling pathway. Cell Biol Int. 2005;29(6):449–457. doi: 10.1016/j.cellbi.2005.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Takahashi H., Alves C.R.R., Stanford K.I., Middelbeek R.J.W., Nigro P., Ryan R.E., et al. TGF-beta2 is an exercise-induced adipokine that regulates glucose and fatty acid metabolism. Nat Metab. 2019;1(2):291–303. doi: 10.1038/s42255-018-0030-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Binder J.X., Pletscher-Frankild S., Tsafou K., Stolte C., O'Donoghue S.I., Schneider R., et al. COMPARTMENTS: unification and visualization of protein subcellular localization evidence. Database. 2014;2014 doi: 10.1093/database/bau012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhang L., Saito H., Higashimoto T., Kaji T., Nakamura A., Iwamori K., et al. Regulation of muscle hypertrophy through granulin: relayed communication among mesenchymal progenitors, macrophages, and satellite cells. Cell Rep. 2024;43(4) doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Nusse R. Wnt signaling. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol. 2012;4(5) doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a011163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Christodoulides C., Lagathu C., Sethi J.K. Vidal-Puig A. Adipogenesis and WNT signalling. Trends Endocrinol Metabol. 2009;20(1):16–24. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2008.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Palomer E., Buechler J., Salinas P.C. Wnt signaling deregulation in the aging and alzheimer's brain. Front Cell Neurosci. 2019;13:227. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Horbelt T., Knebel B., Fahlbusch P., Barbosa D., de Wiza D.H., Van de Velde F., et al. The adipokine sFRP4 induces insulin resistance and lipogenesis in the liver. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2019;1865(10):2671–2684. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2019.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chen D., Zhang Y., Zhang M., Chang J., Zeng Z., Kou X., et al. Exercise attenuates brain aging by rescuing down-regulated Wnt/beta-Catenin signaling in aged rats. Front Aging Neurosci. 2020;12:105. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.00105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bayod S., Mennella I., Sanchez-Roige S., Lalanza J.F., Escorihuela R.M., Camins A., et al. Wnt pathway regulation by long-term moderate exercise in rat hippocampus. Brain Res. 2014;1543:38–48. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.10.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Noelanders R., Vleminckx K. How wnt signaling builds the brain: bridging development and disease. Neuroscientist. 2017;23(3):314–329. doi: 10.1177/1073858416667270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Liebner S., Corada M., Bangsow T., Babbage J., Taddei A., Czupalla C.J., et al. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling controls development of the blood-brain barrier. J Cell Biol. 2008;183(3):409–417. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200806024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Korotkevich G., Sukhov V., Budin N., Shpak B., Artyomov M.N., Sergushichev A. Fast gene set enrichment analysis. biorxiv. 2016 [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sagendorf T (2025). TMSig: Tools for Molecular Signatures. doi:10.18129/B9.bioc.TMSig, R package version 1.2.0, https://bioconductor.org/packages/TMSig.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.pdf (4.2MB, pdf)
Multimedia component 2
mmc2.pdf (1.3MB, pdf)
Multimedia component 3
mmc3.pdf (7.9MB, pdf)
Multimedia component 4
mmc4.pdf (3.4MB, pdf)
Multimedia component 5
mmc5.pdf (1.9MB, pdf)
Multimedia component 6
mmc6.pdf (1MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

Data and code repository address is included in the manuscript.


Articles from Molecular Metabolism are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES