Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2025 Aug 12;20(8):e0329113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329113

Incidence and risk factors for heart failure in the ELSA-Brasil cohort

Ana Paula de Oliveira Lédo 1,¤a,*,#, Sheila Maria Alvim Matos 2,, Maria da Conceição Chagas de Almeida 3,, Roque Aras 1,#
Editor: Alanna Gomes da Silva,4
PMCID: PMC12342299  PMID: 40794638

Abstract

Background

Heart failure (HF) is a clinical condition with high morbidity and mortality and a growing impact on global public health. Longitudinal studies with large samples and extended follow-up are essential to understand its incidence and risk factors in diverse populations.

Objective

To estimate the incidence over time and identify factors associated with the development of HF among participants of the Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil).

Methods

A cohort study with 14,854 ELSA-Brasil participants, followed for an average of 12.3 years. A total of 251 individuals with a previous diagnosis of HF at baseline (2008–2010) were excluded. Incident cases were identified in visits 2 (2012–2014) and 3 (2016–2018). Cumulative incidence and incidence rates were estimated. Bivariate comparisons were performed using the chi-square test, while multivariate analysis employed Cox regression to estimate crude and adjusted Hazard Ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). A statistical significance level of p < 0.05 was adopted.

Results

The incidence of HF was 1.35 per 1,000 person-years (1.39% cumulative) over visits 2 and 3, with 93 new cases in visit 2 (0.61 per 1,000 person-years; 0.63% cumulative) and 113 new cases in visit 3 (0.74 per 1,000 person-years; 0.76% cumulative). Incidence was higher among older adults (65–74 years), self-reported Black individuals, and those with excess weight. Advanced age and abdominal obesity were risk factors present in both visits, while Chagas disease, valvular heart disease, and smoking were specific predictors in visit 2, and hypertension, rheumatic fever, angina, and fatigue were predictors in visit 3.

Conclusion

The study highlights the progression of heart failure (HF) incidence and identifies important modifiable risk factors in the Brazilian population, reinforcing the need for preventive strategies and public policies focused on early detection and management of HF.

Introduction

Heart failure (HF) is a clinical syndrome characterized by the heart’s inability to adequately meet the body’s metabolic demands, often accompanied by increased filling pressures as a compensatory mechanism [1]. It is estimated that 64.3 million people worldwide live with HF [2]. Its prevalence continues to rise due to increased survival, therapeutic advances, and population aging [2, 3, 4]. However, the incidence of HF varies widely across different regions and factors analyzed. According to recent data from the Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risks, 1990–2022, published by the World Heart Federation in 2024 [5], the incidence in high-income countries has remained stable or shown a slight decline in recent years. In Europe, incidence rates in 2022 ranged from approximately 2.0 to 3.2 cases per 1,000 person-years, with some regions reporting values below 2.0 per 1,000 person-years [5,6]. In the United States, recent population-based cohorts estimate incidence between 1.7 and 2.2 cases per 1,000 person-years, indicating a decreasing trend compared to previous decades [7,8].

On the other hand, most of the global burden of cardiovascular diseases occurs in low- and middle-income regions, where approximately 80% of cases are concentrated [9]. Factors such as hypertension (HTN), atherosclerosis, obesity, metabolic syndrome, and diabetes mellitus (DM) play a crucial role in increasing the occurrence of HF and acute coronary events [1,8,10]. In these regions, the scarcity and low reliability of data hinder the assessment of the true magnitude of HF. Consequently, the World Health Organization (WHO) has emphasized the urgency of developing more effective strategies for the prevention and control of cardiovascular diseases, particularly in resource-limited countries, where the burden of these conditions is even more significant [11].

In Brazil, HF represents a serious public health problem, associated with high hospitalization rates and significant costs to the healthcare system [1214]. However, the incidence of the disease remains poorly explored in the country, especially in studies with prospective designs and representative population samples [15]. Available studies are generally limited to specific groups, such as institutionalized elderly, outpatients, or individuals with pre-existing chronic conditions, and often have small samples or cross-sectional designs [16]. These limitations compromise the generalizability of the findings to the adult population at large and hinder the identification of risk factors in the early stages of the disease. This highlights the need for more comprehensive studies, such as ELSA-Brasil, a multicenter prospective cohort study with a large-scale longitudinal design and a long follow-up period, which offers a unique opportunity to generate robust data on the incidence of HF, expand knowledge of its risk factors, and support the development of more effective public health policies. Although the sample is composed of federal civil servants, it presents significant diversity in terms of regions, socioeconomic levels, and races/skin colors within this specific group, allowing the generation of relevant evidence on the occurrence of HF in this occupational context. However, due to the particular characteristics of the sample, generalization of the results to the Brazilian population at large should be approached with caution. The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence of heart failure and identify its predictors among adult participants of the ELSA-Brasil cohort, based on data collected throughout the follow-up period.

Materials and methods

This prospective cohort study used data from the ELSA-Brasil study, which follows 15,105 federal public servants aged 35–74 years from six educational and research institutions in Brazil: Federal University of Bahia, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, University of São Paulo, and Oswaldo Cruz Foundation. Recruitment started on August 1, 2008, and ended on January 4, 2021. The primary objective of ELSA-Brasil is to investigate chronic non-communicable diseases and associated risk factors [17,18].

Study population and follow-up

The present analysis included 14,854 participants from visit 1 (2008–2010), after excluding 251 individuals who reported a prior medical diagnosis of heart failure (HF), as informed in the Previous Medical History (PMH) questionnaire. At baseline, HF identification was based solely on self-report. These participants were followed during visits 2 (2012–2014) and 3 (2016–2018), and extended through 2021. Interviews and in-person examinations were conducted by trained professionals under rigorous quality control [19].

Data collection

Sociodemographic data, lifestyle habits, and comorbidities were assessed by standardized questionnaires. Blood samples were collected for laboratory tests [20], anthropometric measurements were taken [21], and diagnostic tests, such as electrocardiograms (ECG) [22] and echocardiograms (ECHO) [23], were performed following standardized protocols. Variables were categorized according to physical activity level, alcohol consumption, smoking status, Body Mass Index (BMI), serum triglycerides, and education level. Physical activity levels were classified as follows: vigorous activity (≥150 minutes of vigorous activity per week), moderate activity (≥150 minutes of moderate activity per week), and low activity (10 minutes to <150 minutes of walking or moderate activity per week) [24]. Alcohol consumption was categorized as excessive (>210 g of alcohol per week for men and >140 g per week for women) or non-excessive (<210 g per week for men and <140 g per week for women). BMI categories were defined as obese (≥30 kg/m²), overweight (≥25 and <30 kg/m²), and normal weight (<25 kg/m²) [18]. Education level was divided into two categories: up to high school and higher education.

Information regarding the occurrence and date of death was obtained from the human resources departments of the institutions affiliated with the study, the Mortality Information System (SIM—Ministry of Health), and annual phone calls to monitor participants’ health status [25].

Ethical considerations

This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki [26]. The research protocol was approved by the ethics committees of all participating institutions, as well as the National Research Ethics Commission (CEP Registration: 027–06/CEP-ISC). All participants provided written informed consent [27].

Statistical analysis

Descriptive analyses were performed on the baseline profile of participants from ELSA-Brasil who did not have a prior diagnosis of HF. For continuous variables such as age and waist circumference, the median and interquartile range (Q1: 25th percentile–Q3: 75th percentile) were calculated after verifying normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test. For categorical variables, absolute (n) and relative (%) frequencies were estimated, with comparisons performed using Pearson’s chi-square test. The statistical significance level adopted was p< 0.05.

Incidence was expressed in two ways: cumulative incidence (or absolute risk), represented by the proportion of new HF cases relative to the initial population, and incidence rate (density), expressed as cases per 1,000 person-years, considering the accumulated follow-up time. To estimate cumulative incidence, only new HF cases identified in visits 2 and 3 at the study’s investigation centers were included. The calculation was performed by dividing the number of new HF cases occurring in each period by the total number of individuals free of the condition at the start of follow-up (visit 1). The incidence rate (density) was estimated considering the time until the occurrence of new HF cases, using the Kaplan-Meier method, which allows for the analysis of event-free survival. The life table was applied based on the following criteria: a) Event of interest: new HF cases identified in visits 2 and 3; b) Observation period: 12.3 years (August 1, 2008, to January 4, 2021); c) Censoring: loss to follow-up or participants who did not develop the disease. The comparison between incidence curves was performed using the log-rank test, considering p< 0.05 as statistically significant. To identify prognostic factors associated with time to HF development, Cox regression was applied for both univariate and multivariate (adjusted) analyses. Association measures were expressed as Hazard Ratio (HR) and their respective 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Variables included in the multivariate analysis were assessed for the proportional hazards assumption using the test for proportional hazards assumption, adopting p< 0.05 as statistically significant.

Missing data were assessed beforehand. As the proportion of missing values was low (<5%) for most variables, analyses were conducted using complete-case analysis (excluding participants with missing information). No imputation methods were applied. All analyses were performed using STATA software, version 16.

Results

A total of 14,854 baseline participants (2008–2010) from the ELSA-Brasil cohort were evaluated. The sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of this population are presented in Table 1. The majority were female, totaling 8,094 (54.5%), with a median age of 51 years (interquartile range: 45–58 years). Regarding lifestyle, 76.8% were classified as minimally active, 40.2% were overweight, and 22.6% were obese. The most prevalent comorbidities were hypertension 5,235 (35.3%) and diabetes mellitus 2,327 (15.7%).

Table 1. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of participants without a prior diagnosis of HF at visit 1 (n = 14,854).

Characteristics n Total Participants*
(n = 14,854)
Sex
 Female 8,094 (54.5)
 Male 6,760 (45.5)
 Age (years), median and IQR 51 (45__58)
 Age range (years)
 35-44 3,315 (22.3)
 45-54 5,878 (39.6)
 55-64 4,129 (27.8)
 65-74 1,519 (10.2)
Race/skin color
 White 7,695 (52.4)
 Brown 4,127 (28.1)
 Black 2,333 (15.9)
 Indigenous 154 (1.0)
 Yellow 366 (2.5)
Education level
 Higher education (completed) 7,869 (53.0)
 Secondary education (completed) 6,985 (47.0)
Physical activity
 Highly active 1,040 (7.1)
 Moderately active 2,356 (16.0)
 Low active 11,245 (76.8)
Smoking status
 Never smoker 8,483 (57.1)
 Former smoker 4,420 (29.8)
 Current smoker 1,950 (13.1)
Alcohol use
 No 13,722 (92.5)
 Yes 1,109 (7.5)
BMI (kg/m²)
 Normal weight 5,522 (37.1)
 Overweight 5,971 (40.2)
 Obesity 3,355 (22.6)
Abdominal obesity
 No 9,569 (64.4)
 Yes 5,283 (35.6)
Waist circumference (cm), median and IQR 90.3 (82__99)

ELSA-Brasil (2008–2010).

*Participants without a diagnosis of HF at visit 1. The sum of absolute values may differ due to missing data.

Values presented as absolute frequency (n) and relative frequency (%).

Values expressed as median and IQR: interquartile range (Q1: 25th percentile – Q3: 75th percentile).

Incidence

Over 12.3 years of follow-up, 14,854 participants without a prior diagnosis of HF at baseline were monitored. The incidence of HF in the ELSA-Brasil cohort was estimated by identifying new cases in visits 2 and 3. In visit 2 (2012–2014), 93 new cases were identified, considering follow-up losses, observed over a total of 153,133.04 person-years. The cumulative incidence was 0.63%, with an incidence rate of 0.61 per 1,000 person-years (or 61/100,000 person-years). Table 2 presents the details of the analysis.

Table 2. Life table for time in years until the occurrence of HF in visits 2 and 3.

Time
interval
Total participants visit 2 New cased visit 2 Censored observation Survival probabibility
visit 2
Total participants visit 3 New cases visit 3 Censored obervations Survival probability visit 3
3─4 years 13,802 1 3 0.9999
4─5 years 13,798 1 53 0.9999
5─6 years 13,744 2 87 0.9997
6─7 years 13,655 2 74 0.9996 12,461 0 3 1.0000
7─8 years 13,579 1 115 0.9995 12,458 0 11 1.0000
8─9 years 13,463 6 295 0.9990 12,447 3 189 0.9998
9─10 years 13,162 17 2,977 0.9976 12,255 22 2,672 0.9977
10─11 years 10,168 44 6,528 0.9912 9,561 54 6,108 0.9895
11─12 years 596 19 3,518 0.9810 3,399 33 3 0.9707
12─13 years 59 0 59 0.9810 56 1 55 0.9367

ELSA-Brasil (August 1, 2008, to January 4, 2021).

In visit 3 (2016–2018), after accounting for follow-up losses, 113 new cases of HF were identified in a total of 153,133.04 person-years of observation. The cumulative incidence was 0.76%, and the incidence rate was 0.74 per 1,000 person-years (or 74/100,000 person-years). According to the life table (Table 2), during the 9- to 10-year interval, 12,255 individuals remained at risk, with 22 new cases and 2,672 censored observations. By the end of this interval, 99% of participants had not developed HF.

Table 3 presents the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of new HF cases in visits 2 and 3 at the study’s investigation centers. In visit 2, HF incidence was similar between men (0.62%) and women (0.63%), being higher among participants aged 65–74 years (1.38%), self-reported Black individuals (1.07%), smokers (0.97%), and former smokers (0.81%). Individuals with overweight (0.30%) and obesity (0.22%) also had a higher incidence, whereas engaging in intense physical activity was associated with a lower occurrence (0.48%).

Table 3. Population distribution and heart failure incidence estimates in Visits 2 and 3, according to sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of participants without heart failure at baseline.

Characteristics* n (%) Person- years at Risk visit 2 New cases
visit 2
Cumulative Incidence (%) visit 2 HF Incidence rate per 1,000 person-years visit 2 Person-years at Risk
visit 3
New cases
visit 3
Cumulative
Incidence
(%)
visit 3
HF Incidence rate per 1,000 person-years visit 3
Sex
 Female 8,094 (54.5) 51,133.04 51 (0.63) 0.60 32,376 61 (0.75) 1.88
 Male 6,760 (45.5) 68,820.40 42 (0.62) 0.61 27,040 52 (0.77) 1.92
Age range (years)
 35–44 3,315 (22.3) 13,461.7 7 (0.21) 0.52 13,260 1 (0.03) 0.07
 45–54 5,878 (39.6) 33,559.64 33 (0.56) 0.98 23,512 22 (0.37) 0.93
 55–64 4,129 (27.8) 39,346.27 32 (0.77) 0.81 16,516 38 (0.92) 2.30
 65–74 1,519 (10.2) 58,285.03 21 (1.38) 0.36 6,076 44 (2.89) 6.75
Race/skin color
 White 7,695 (52.4) 62,856.15 37 (0.48) 0.59 30,780 55 (0.72) 1.79
 Brown 4,127 (28.1) 33,69.62 29 (0.70) 0.86 16,508 26 (0.63) 1.57
 Black 2,333 (15.9) 19,033.68 25 (1.07) 1.31 9,332 29 (1.24) 3.11
BMI (kg/m²)
 Normal weight 5,522 (37.1) 44,502.73 16 (0.11) 0.36 22,088 17 (0.31) 0.77
 Overweight 5,971 (40.2) 48,221.28 44 (0.30) 0.91 23,884 53 (0.89) 2.22
 Obesity 3,355 (22.6) 27,109.48 33 (0.22) 1.22 13,420 43 (1.28) 3.20
Physical activity
 High 1,040 (7.1) 8,839.06 5 (0.48) 0.57 4,160 7 (0.67) 1.68
 Moderate 2,356 (16.0) 19,021.91 13 (0.55) 0.68 9,424 16 (0.68) 1.70
 Low 11,245 (76.8) 92,092.49 74 (0.66) 0.80 44,980 88 (0.78) 1.96
Smoking Status
 Never Smoker 8,483 (57.1) 51,177.94 38 (0.45) 0.74 33,932 67 (0.79) 1.97
 Former Smoker 4,420 (29.8) 26,665.86 36 (0.81) 1.35 17,680 31 (0.70) 1.75
 Current Smoker 1,950 (13.1) 11,764.35 19 (0.97) 1.62 7,800 15 (0.77) 1.92
Alcohol use
 No 13,722 (92.5) 93,381.74 86 (0.63) 0.92 54,888 102 (0.74) 1.86
 Yes 1,109 (7.5) 6,973.59 7 (0.64) 1.00 4,436 11 (0.99) 2.48

ELSA-Brasil (2008/2010–2012/2014; 2008/2010–2016/2018).

*Characteristics of participants without a heart failure diagnosis at baseline. The sum of absolute values may vary due to missing data.

Values are presented as absolute frequency (n) and relative frequency.

In visit 3, HF incidence remained similar between sexes, at 0.75% in women and 0.77% in men. However, a considerable increase was observed among participants aged 65–74 years (2.89%), self-reported Black individuals (1.24%), and those with obesity (1.28%). Although intense physical activity continued to show a protective association, excessive alcohol consumption became more strongly related to a higher HF incidence in visit 3 (0.99%).

The crude and adjusted Hazard Ratios (HR) for factors associated with HF incidence in visits 2 and 3 of the ELSA-Brasil cohort, estimated using Cox proportional hazards models, are presented in Table 4. In visit 2, in the adjusted model, the factors significantly associated with a higher risk of HF were: abdominal obesity (HR = 3.1; 95% CI: 1.9–4.7), smoking (HR = 2.6; 95% CI: 1.5–4.5), Chagas disease (HR = 20.3; 95% CI: 8.7–47.5), and moderate/severe valvular disease (HR = 34.4; 95% CI: 12.2–96.4). Additionally, for each additional year of age, the risk of HF increased by 6% (HR = 1.06; 95% CI: 1.04–1.09). These findings remained consistent between the crude and adjusted models (p < 0.05), reinforcing their robustness (Fig 1).

Table 4. Cox proportional hazards regression for the incidence of HF in visits 2 (n = 93) and 3 (n = 113) of the ELSA-Brasil cohort.

Variables Crude HR*
95% CI**
(visit 2)
Adjusted HR
95% CI
(visit 2)
Crude HR
95% CI
(visit 3)
Adjusted HR
95% CI
(visit 3)
Age (years) 1.07 (1.05—1.10) 1.06 (1.04—1.09) 1.05 (1.03—1.07) 1.03(1.01—1.06)
Abdominal obesity
 No 1 1
 Yes 3.13 (2.06—4.76) 3.06 (1.99—4.71) 3.32 (2.26—4.87) 1.83 (1.10—3.06)
Smoking status
 Never smoker 1
 Former smoker 1.85 (1.17—2.92) 1.5(0.98—2.50)
 Current smoker 2.22 (1.28—3.86) 2.59(1.48—4.52)
Left ventricular dilation (>6.5 cm)
 No 1
 Yes 192.64(47.14—787.22) 4.63(0.78—27.67)
Chagas disease
 No 1
 Yes 20.98 (9.16—48.04) 20.32(8.70—47.46)
Valvulopathy (moderate/severe)
 No 1
 Yes 49.54(21.60—113.61) 34.37(12.25—96.38)
Race/skin color
 White 1
 Brown 1.73 (1.10—2.72) 1.43 (0.90—2.26)
 Black 0.84 (0.53—1.35) 0.82 (0.52—1.32)
 Others 0.26 (0.36—1.87) 0.29 (0.40—2.10)
BMI (kg/m²)
 Normal weight 1
 Overweight 2.98 (1.72—5.14) 1.99 (1.08—3.69)
 Obesity 4.31 (2.45—7.56) 1.88 (0.89—3.96)
Hypertension
 No 1
 Yes 2.85 (1.96—4.15) 1.81 (1.20—2.74)
Fatigue symptom
 No 1
 Yes 1.74 (1.21—2.53) 1.58 (1.08—2.32)
Angina
 No 1
 Yes 4.71(2.59—8.58) 2.62 (1.41—4.86)
Rheumatic fever
 No 1
 Yes 2.91 (1.47—5.75) 2.61(1.31—5.19)

ELSA-Brasil (August 1, 2008, to January 4, 2021);

*HR: hazard ratios.

**95%CI: 95% confidence interval.

Others: (Indigenous and Yellow).

p: corresponding to the log-rank test, with statistical significance: p-value <0.05.

Fig 1. Association of baseline age and waist circumference with incident heart failure in ELSA-Brasil.

Fig 1

(A) Box plot showing baseline age comparing participants without heart failure (HF) (n = 14,854) and incident HF cases at visit 2 (n = 93). Median age was significantly higher among incident cases (p < 0.01), period 2008–2014. (B) Box plot showing baseline waist circumference comparing participants without HF (n = 14,854) and incident HF cases at visit 3 (n = 113). Waist circumference was significantly greater among incident cases (p < 0.01), period 2008–2018.

In visit 3, in the adjusted model, the factors significantly associated with an increased risk of HF were: overweight (HR = 1.9; 95%CI: 1.1–3.7), abdominal obesity (HR = 1.8; 95%CI: 1.1–3.1), hypertension (HR = 1.8; 95%CI: 1.2–2.7), fatigue symptoms (HR = 1.6; 95%CI: 1.1–2.3), angina (HR = 2.6; 95%CI: 1.4–4.9), and rheumatic fever (HR = 2.6; 95%CI: 1.3–5.2). The risk of HF also increased progressively with age, with a 3% increase per additional year (HR = 1.03; 95%CI: 1.01–1.06). Self-reported Black race/skin color was significantly associated in the univariate analysis (HR = 1.7; 95%CI: 1.1–2.7) but lost significance after adjustment for confounding factors (HR = 1.4; 95%CI: 0.9–2.3).

The total HF incidence estimate was obtained through the combined analysis of visits 2 and 3, reflecting disease progression in the cohort over 12.3 years. Among the 14,854 baseline participants, 206 new HF cases were identified after accounting for losses to follow-up, resulting in a total observation time of 306,266.08 person-years. The cumulative incidence was 1.39%, and the incidence rate was 1.35 per 1,000 person-years (or 135/100,000 person-years) (Table 5).

Table 5. Total Incidence Results of HF in Visits 2 and 3.

Period New cases of HF Cumulative Incidence (%) Incidence rate per 1,000
person-years
Visit 2 (2012─2014) 93 (0.63) 0.61
Visit 3 (2016─2018) 113 (0.76) 0.74
Total 206 (1.39) 1.35

ELSA-Brasil (August 1, 2008, to January 4, 2021)

Discussion

We observed a progressive increase in the incidence of HF over 12.3 years of follow-up in the ELSA-Brasil cohort. Incidence rates per 1,000 person-years were 0.61 at visit 2 and 0.74 at visit 3, resulting in a total cumulative incidence of 1.39% and an average rate of 1.35 per 1,000 person-years (135/100,000 person-years). These findings confirm the epidemiological relevance of the cohort, especially given the scarcity of longitudinal HF studies in Brazil. Moreover, they are consistent with South American studies reporting rates close to 1.99 per 1,000 person-years [15,16], supporting the robustness and applicability of our results in similar contexts.

HF incidence varies by region and population profile [57]. In high-income countries, there is a trend toward stabilization or decline in incidence rates [2,3], whereas data from Latin America remain scarce and heterogeneous. For example, cohort studies conducted in Argentina have reported rates ranging from 1.37 to 5.57 per 1,000 person-years, highlighting regional disparities and underscoring the need for health policies based on local data [16].

In the ELSA-Brasil cohort, the baseline population was predominantly female (54.5%) with a median age of 51 years. There was a high prevalence of overweight, physical inactivity, hypertension, and diabetes, conditions widely recognized as risk factors for HF due to their contribution to systemic inflammation, ventricular dysfunction, and cardiac remodeling [1,2,8,10].

No statistically significant difference in HF incidence was observed between men and women during follow-up (p = 0.44). Although previous studies report a higher risk among men, particularly in cases of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) [28], recent evidence suggests that shared clinical, social, and behavioral factors may mitigate this difference in populations with equitable access to healthcare, such as ours [1,2,10]. This finding highlights the importance of considering both the different clinical presentations of HF and the social determinants of health when interpreting data.

Cox regression models identified advanced age and abdominal obesity as consistent and significant predictors of HF risk at visits 2 and 3, underscoring their central role in the disease’s pathophysiology. Aging induces progressive structural and functional cardiac changes, especially when accompanied by comorbidities and degenerative senescence processes [4,8]. Abdominal obesity contributes to chronic inflammation, insulin resistance, and endothelial dysfunction—key mechanisms in HF development [2,9].

At visit 2, smoking, Chagas disease, and valvular heart disease were significantly associated with HF incidence. Smoking is a well-established cardiovascular risk factor due to its inflammatory, pro-thrombotic, and oxidative effects [10]. Chagas disease and valvular pathologies, both endemic conditions in Brazil, represent relevant structural causes of HF with significant clinical and prognostic impact [4,29,30].

At visit 3, in addition to previously identified predictors, new clinical factors and symptoms emerged, including hypertension, overweight, fatigue, angina, and rheumatic fever. Hypertension is a central determinant of the disease due to its role in inducing hypertrophy and ventricular dysfunction [10]. Overweight contributes to metabolic dysfunction, increased hemodynamic load, and systemic inflammation [2,9]. Symptoms such as fatigue and angina may indicate early clinical manifestations, emphasizing the importance of early screening and structured follow-up [2932]. Although less prevalent, rheumatic fever evidences the persistence of infectious causes in the Brazilian context.

In univariate analysis at visit 3, self-reported Black individuals exhibited a higher risk of HF, but this association lost significance after adjustment for socioeconomic and clinical factors, suggesting disparities reflect structural inequalities and the impact of structural racism rather than skin color per se [1,5,8]. This underscores the urgent need to incorporate racial equity into preventive strategies and strengthen policies addressing social inequalities disproportionately affecting the Black population.

The findings from the ELSA-Brasil cohort reveal the dynamic evolution of factors associated with HF over time and highlight the need for integrated prevention strategies focused on rigorous control of modifiable risk factors and early screening. In Brazil, public policies such as income transfer programs and initiatives aimed at strengthening primary care for hypertension and diabetes management have shown potential to modify the population’s epidemiological profile and should be fully integrated into HF control strategies [33,34].

Limitations

The cohort is composed of federal public servants, which may limit representativeness of the socioeconomic extremes and attenuate associations with certain risk factors. There is potential for healthy worker bias, reliance on self-reported variables, and loss to follow-up. Despite the long average follow-up (12.3 years), the number of incident cases aligns with the chronic, slowly progressive nature of HF and may not fully capture late-onset case

Conclusions

The results of this study highlight the incidence of heart failure (HF) in the ELSA-Brasil cohort, with higher occurrence among older adults, individuals with obesity, and smokers. A progressive increase in incidence rates was observed over time. Advanced age and abdominal obesity were associated with HF in both follow-up phases, while Chagas disease, valvular heart disease, and smoking were significant predictors in Visit 2, and hypertension in Visit 3. These findings underscore the importance of early detection and appropriate management of cardiovascular conditions, as well as the control of modifiable risk factors. Such evidence can inform public policies and more effective prevention strategies to reduce the burden of HF in Brazil.

Supporting information

S1 File. Analysis of Age and Waist Circumference in Incident Heart Failure Cases.

This file contains box plots and statistical analyses of baseline age and waist circumference comparing participants with and without incident heart failure at visits 2 and 3 of the ELSA-Brasil cohort. It includes tests of normality (Shapiro-Wilk), justification for using non-parametric tests (Mann-Whitney), and presentation of median values.

(DOCX)

pone.0329113.s001.docx (889.2KB, docx)

Acknowledgments

We thank the cohort participants who agreed to collaborate in this study and the ELSA-Brasil research team for their valuable contributions.

This article is part of the doctoral thesis of Ana Paula de Oliveira Lédo, developed within the Graduate Program in Medicine and Health, School of Medicine, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The data used in this study come from the ELSA-Brasil cohort, which is funded by the Brazilian Ministry of Health (Department of Science and Technology) and the Ministry of Science and Technology (FINEP and CNPq), under the following research grant numbers: 01 06 0010.00 RS, 01 06 0212.00 BA, 01 06 0300.00 ES, 01 06 0278.00 MG, 01 06 0115.00 SP, and 01 06 0071.00 RJ. No specific funding was received for the current study. The funders had no role in the design of the study, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Bocchi EA, Brandão AA, Mesquita ET, Nakamuta JS, Bichels AV, Forestiero FJ. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in Brazil: a systematic review. ABC Heart Fail Cardiomyop. 2023;3(3):e20230033. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Savarese G, Becher PM, Lund LH, Seferovic P, Rosano GMC, Coats AJS. Global burden of heart failure: a comprehensive and updated review of epidemiology. Cardiovasc Res. 2023;118(17):3272–87. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvac013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Khan MS, Shahid I, Bennis A, Rakisheva A, Metra M, Butler J. Global epidemiology of heart failure. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2024;21(10):717–34. doi: 10.1038/s41569-024-01046-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Coats AJS. Ageing, demographics, and heart failure. Eur Heart J Suppl. 2019;21(Suppl L):L4–7. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/suz235 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mensah GA, Fuster V, Murray CJL, Roth GA, Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risks Collaborators. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risks, 1990-2022. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023;82(25):2350–473. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.11.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tromp J, Shah ASV, Ouwerkerk W, Anker SD, Cleland JGF, Dickstein K, et al. Epidemiology of heart failure: insights from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2022. Eur J Heart Fail. 2024;26(3):295-–308. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2781 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tsao CW, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, Alonso A, Beaton AZ, Bittencourt MS, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2022 update: a report from the american heart association. Circulation. 2022;145(8):e153–639. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cho D-H, Yoo B-S. Current prevalence, incidence, and outcomes of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Heart Fail Clin. 2021;17(3):315–26. doi: 10.1016/j.hfc.2021.03.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dokainish H, Teo K, Zhu J, Roy A, Al-Habib K, ElSayed A, et al. Heart failure in low- and middle-income countries: background, rationale, and design of the INTERnational Congestive Heart Failure Study (INTER-CHF). Am Heart J. 2015;170(4):627-634.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.07.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Komanduri S, Jadhao Y, Guduru SS, Cheriyath P, Wert Y. Prevalence and risk factors of heart failure in the USA: NHANES 2013 - 2014 epidemiological follow-up study. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2017;7(1):15–20. doi: 10.1080/20009666.2016.1264696 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Santos SC, Villela PB, Oliveira GMM de. Mortality Due to Heart Failure and Socioeconomic Development in Brazil between 1980 and 2018. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2021;117(5):944–51. doi: 10.36660/abc.20200902 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mesquita ET, Mendes AP, Moura L, Figueiredo Neto JA de, Marcondes-Braga FG, Bacal F, et al. The challenges of heart failure yesterday, today and tomorrow and the 20 Years of DEIC. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2021;116(2):359–62. doi: 10.36660/abc.20201200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Arruda VL de, Machado LMG, Lima JC, Silva PR de S. Trends in mortality from heart failure in Brazil: 1998 to 2019. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2022;25:E220021. doi: 10.1590/1980-549720220021.2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Stevens B, Pezzullo L, Verdian L, Tomlinson J, George A, Bacal F. The economic burden of heart conditions in Brazil. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2018;111(1):29–36. doi: 10.5935/abc.20180104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Heidemann AI Jr, Santos ABS, Bittencourt MS, Ribeiro ALP, Rohde LE, Lotufo PA, et al. Prevalence and mortality of heart failure stages in a free-living older adult population: data from the brazilian longitudinal study of adult health. J Am Heart Assoc. 2025;14(5):e038993. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.038993 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ciapponi A, Alcaraz A, Calderón M, Matta MG, Chaparro M, Soto N, et al. Burden of heart failure in latin america: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2016;69(11):1051–60. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2016.04.054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Aquino EML, Barreto SM, Bensenor IM, Carvalho MS, Chor D, Duncan BB, et al. Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil): objectives and design. Am J Epidemiol. 2012;175(4):315–24. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr294 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Schmidt MI, Duncan BB, Mill JG, Lotufo PA, Chor D, Barreto SM, et al. Cohort profile: longitudinal study of adult health (ELSA-Brasil). Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44(1):68–75. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Schmidt MI, Griep RH, Passos VM, Luft VC, Goulart AC, Menezes GM de S, et al. Strategies and development of quality assurance and control in the ELSA-Brasil. Rev Saude Publica. 2013;47 Suppl 2:105–12. doi: 10.1590/s0034-8910.2013047003889 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Fedeli LG, Vidigal PG, Leite CM, Castilhos CD, Pimentel RA, Maniero VC, et al. Logistics of collection and transportation of biological samples and the organization of the central laboratory in the ELSA-Brasil. Rev Saude Publica. 2013;47 Suppl 2:63–71. doi: 10.1590/s0034-8910.2013047003807 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mill JG, Pinto K, Griep RH, Goulart A, Foppa M, Lotufo PA, et al. Medical assessments and measurements in ELSA-Brasil. Rev Saude Publica. 2013;47(2):54–62. doi: 10.1590/s0034-8910.2013047003851 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ribeiro AL, Pereira SV da C, Bergmann K, Ladeira RM, Oliveira RAM, Lotufo PA, et al. Desafios à implantação do centro de leitura de eletrocardiografia no ELSA-Brasil. Rev Saúde Pública. 2013;47(suppl 2):87–94. doi: 10.1590/s0034-8910.2013047004406 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fernandes LP, Almeida M da CC de, Matos SA de, Campos ACP, Câmara EJN, Foppa M, et al. Parâmetros ecocardiográficos simples são fortes preditores de risco cardiovascular em indivíduos assintomáticos: coorte Elsa-Brasil. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia. 2022;118(5):916–24. doi: 10.36660/abc.20210101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pitanga FJG, Matos SMA, Almeida M da C, Barreto SM, Aquino EML. Leisure-time physical activity, but not commuting physical activity, is associated with cardiovascular risk among ELSA-Brasil participants. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2018;110(1):36–43. doi: 10.5935/abc.20170178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Barreto SM, Ladeira RM, Bastos M do SCB de O, Diniz M de FHS, Jesus EA de, Kelles SMB, et al. ELSA-Brasil strategies for outcome identification, investigation and ascertainment. Rev Saude Publica. 2013;47 Suppl 2:79–86. doi: 10.1590/s0034-8910.2013047003836 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.World Medical Association. World medical association declaration of helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2024;322(15):1521–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Aquino EML, Araujo MJ, Almeida M da CC, Conceição P, Andrade CR de, Cade NV, et al. Participants recruitment in ELSA-Brasil (Brazilian Longitudinal Study for Adult Health). Rev Saude Publica. 2013;47 Suppl 2:10–8. doi: 10.1590/s0034-8910.2013047003953 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bui AL, Horwich TB, Fonarow GC. Epidemiology and risk profile of heart failure. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011;8(1):30–41. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2010.165 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rohde LE, Montera MW, Bocchi EA, Clausell NO, Albuquerque DC, Rassi S. Brazilian guideline for chronic and acute heart failure. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2018;111(3):436–539.30379264 [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Shen L, Ramires F, Martinez F, Bodanese LC, Echeverría LE, Gómez EA, et al. Contemporary characteristics and outcomes in chagasic heart failure compared with other nonischemic and ischemic cardiomyopathy. Circ Heart Fail. 2017;10(11):e004361. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.117.004361 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Fernandes-Silva MM, Shah AM, Hegde S, Goncalves A, Claggett B, Cheng S, et al. Race-related differences in left ventricular structural and functional remodeling in response to increased afterload: the ARIC study. JACC Heart Fail. 2017;5(3):157–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lam CSP, Donal E, Kraigher-Krainer E, Vasan RS. Epidemiology and clinical course of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail. 2011;13(1):18–28. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfq121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Aransiola TJ, Cavalcanti D, Ordoñez JA, Hessel P, Moncayo AL, Chivardi C, et al. Current and projected mortality and hospitalization rates associated with conditional cash transfer, social pension, and primary health care programs in Brazil, 2000-2030. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(4):e247519. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.7519 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ortega F, Pele A. Brazil’s unified health system: 35 years and future challenges. The Lancet Regional Health - Americas. 2023;28:100631. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100631 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Alanna Gomes da Silva

9 Jun 2025

PONE-D-25-07478Incidence and risk factors for heart failure in the ELSA-Brasil cohortPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. LÉDO,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jul 24 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Alanna Gomes da Silva, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please amend the manuscript submission data (via Edit Submission) to include authors Ana Paula Lédo and Roque Aras.

3. Please amend your authorship list in your manuscript file to include authors ANA PAULA DE OLIVEIRA PAULA LÉDO and Roque Aras Júnior.

4. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

5. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

This study addresses a highly relevant public health topic by investigating the incidence of heart failure (HF) and its associated factors within the ELSA-Brasil cohort. It is a pertinent and timely subject that can contribute to a deeper understanding of the cardiovascular disease burden in Brazil. However, the manuscript still requires substantial revisions in its rationale, updating of references, discussion structure, and methodological detail to strengthen its scientific consistency and argumentative coherence.

Abstract:

In the introduction of the abstract, the rationale for conducting the study should not be based solely on the absence or scarcity of previous research. It is recommended to reformulate this section to emphasize the relevance of the topic and the methodological strengths of the present study. Additionally, the conclusion in the abstract should clearly reflect the main findings.

Introduction:

The references used to contextualize the burden of disease—such as citations 5 and 6—are outdated (2018 and 2019 data, prior to the COVID-19 pandemic), which weakens the relevance of the discussion. It is advisable to incorporate more recent sources, such as the Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risks, 1990–2022 (World Heart Federation, 2024), and to specify the year for each data point presented.

The use of informal in-text references (e.g., “In the HFA-ATLAS project...”, “data from the Olmsted County Study”) should be avoided to maintain formal academic style.

While the manuscript highlights the importance of HF as a public health issue in Brazil and acknowledges the potential of ELSA-Brasil, the rationale needs to be strengthened. It is essential to clearly identify the knowledge gaps this study aims to fill. For instance, which previous studies relied on specific subgroups or small samples? What are the limitations of those studies that justify the current analysis? Furthermore, the authors should highlight what is novel in their approach using ELSA-Brasil—whether it's the follow-up period, analytical strategy, or focus on particular subgroups or variables.

Importantly, the rationale states the need for more representative and large-scale studies on HF incidence in Brazil, yet the study population consists solely of federal public servants. This creates a conceptual inconsistency. The authors are encouraged to revise this section by emphasizing the relevance of investigating HF incidence and associated factors within a population that has specific characteristics (e.g., higher educational level, job stability, access to healthcare), while avoiding overgeneralization to the broader Brazilian population.

Lastly, the stated objective in the introduction should match the one presented in the abstract. Consistency is necessary.

Methods:

The methods section should be revised and aligned with the STROBE checklist for cohort studies. This includes a clear logical sequence and the proper description of key aspects such as the outcome definition, inclusion/exclusion criteria, bias control strategies, and handling of follow-up losses.

Discussion:

The discussion also contains outdated references—these should be replaced with more recent epidemiological data.

Lines 259–261: The statement that "Factors such as sex, age group, hypertension, and socioeconomic conditions have been associated with the development of the disease" is too superficial. The discussion should explain why these factors are associated, based on literature and the study’s findings.

Each new topic in the discussion should begin in a separate paragraph. For instance, line 262 discusses sex, while line 265 abruptly shifts to age within the same paragraph. This should be revised throughout the manuscript, including in the introduction.

The discussion on the lack of association between sex and HF is underdeveloped. Merely stating that the findings are consistent with a previous study is not analytically sufficient. The authors should explore whether this null result was expected, what hypotheses might explain it in the context of the studied population, whether confounders were adequately controlled for, and what implications this has for the literature or for health policy. The same applies to age, race/skin color, overweight, and obesity. The discussion should address the implications and potential explanations for these findings—not just describe them.

Lines 269–274: This paragraph largely repeats the study results and lacks interpretation. The discussion should avoid unnecessary repetition of findings already presented in the results section and instead focus on their interpretation and relevance. Furthermore, race/skin color is mentioned descriptively but not discussed in depth, which should be corrected.

Limitations:

While the limitation related to the cohort composition (public servants) is valid, it should be complemented by other potential sources of bias and methodological limitations, such as: selection bias (healthy worker effect); loss to follow-up; reliance on self-reported variables; relatively low number of incident cases to date; follow-up period that may not capture late-onset HF cases.

Conclusion:

It is recommended to remove the term “vulnerable groups,” as not all of the groups mentioned (e.g., older adults, individuals with obesity) fit this definition in public health.

The phrase “key predictors at different stages of follow-up” is vague and should be clarified—what predictors, and during which stages? The conclusion should be more objective and better aligned with the study’s main findings, emphasizing their practical and scientific implications.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The manuscript presents a valuable contribution to the understanding of heart failure in the ELSA-Brasil cohort. The research question is important, the methodology is rigorous, and the statistical analysis is appropriate for the data. The results are presented clearly, and the discussion is insightful. However, I believe some minor revisions could strengthen the manuscript further.

Methods Section: The methodology is generally clear, but I suggest providing more detail on how heart failure was diagnosed and classified within the cohort. Clarifying whether the diagnosis was made based on clinical criteria, imaging, or biomarkers would improve the reproducibility of the study.

Statistical Analysis: The statistical methods are well explained. One suggestion is to include a more detailed explanation of how missing data were handled in the analyses, as this information is crucial for evaluating the robustness of the results.

Conclusion: The conclusions are well supported by the data, but I would encourage the authors to discuss more explicitly how these findings could inform public health strategies in Brazil or similar settings, particularly regarding prevention and management of heart failure.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #1: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org . Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2025 Aug 12;20(8):e0329113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329113.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 1


2 Jul 2025

Comments:

This study addresses a highly relevant public health topic by investigating the incidence of heart failure (HF) and its associated factors within the ELSA-Brasil cohort. It is a pertinent and timely subject that can contribute to a deeper understanding of the cardiovascular disease burden in Brazil. However, the manuscript still requires substantial revisions in its rationale, updating of references, discussion structure, and methodological detail to strengthen its scientific consistency and argumentative coherence.

Response: We acknowledge the importance of these observations and have made substantial revisions to the study rationale, updated the references with recent and high-impact works, reorganized the discussion for greater clarity and depth, and detailed the methodology aligning it with the STROBE checklist for cohort studies.

Abstract:

In the introduction of the abstract, the rationale for conducting the study should not be based solely on the absence or scarcity of previous research. It is recommended to reformulate this section to emphasize the relevance of the topic and the methodological strengths of the present study. Additionally, the conclusion in the abstract should clearly reflect the main findings.

Response: We reformulated the introduction of the abstract to highlight the relevance of heart failure in Brazil and the methodological advantages of the ELSA-Brasil study, including sample size and prospective follow-up. We adjusted the conclusion to objectively reflect the main results.

Introduction:

The references used to contextualize the burden of disease—such as citations 5 and 6—are outdated (2018 and 2019 data, prior to the COVID-19 pandemic), which weakens the relevance of the discussion. It is advisable to incorporate more recent sources, such as the Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risks, 1990–2022 (World Heart Federation, 2024), and to specify the year for each data point presented.

The use of informal in-text references (e.g., “In the HFA-ATLAS project...”, “data from the Olmsted County Study”) should be avoided to maintain formal academic style.

Response: We removed references 5, 6, and 7 and included recent references: Mensah et al. (2023), Tromp et al. (2024), and Virani et al. (2022).

5. Conrad N, Judge A, Tran J, Mohseni H, Hedgecott D, Crespillo AP, et al. Temporal trends and patterns in heart failure incidence: a population-based study of 4 million individuals. Lancet. 2018 Feb 10;391(10120):572-580. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32520-5.

6. Seferović P M, Vardas P, Jankowska E A, Maggioni A P, Timmis A, Milinković I, et al. The Heart Failure Association Atlas: heart failure epidemiology and management statistics 2019. Eur J Heart Fail. 2021 Jun;23(6):906-914. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2143. Epub 2021 Mar 13.

7. Gerber Y, Weston SA, Redfield MM, Chamberlain AM, Manemann SM, Jiang R, et al. A contemporary appraisal of the heart failure epidemic in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 2000 to 2010. JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jun;175(6):996-1004. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.0924.

●We adjusted the in-text citations to ensure formality.

●We updated references 5, 6, and 7 by including more recent citations:

5. Mensah GA, Fuster V, Murray CJL, Roth GA; Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risks Collaborators. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risks, 1990–2022. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Dec 19;82(25):2350–73. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2023.11.007.

6.Tromp J, Shah ASV, Ouwerkerk W, Anker SD, Cleland JGF, Dickstein K, et al. Epidemiology of heart failure: insights from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2022. Eur J Heart Fail. 2024;26(3):295-308. doi:10.1002/ejhf.2781.

7.Virani SS, Alonso A, Aparicio HJ, Benjamin EJ, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2022 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2022;145(8):e153-e639. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001052.

Comments: While the manuscript highlights the importance of HF as a public health issue in Brazil and acknowledges the potential of ELSA-Brasil, the rationale needs to be strengthened. It is essential to clearly identify the knowledge gaps this study aims to fill. For instance, which previous studies relied on specific subgroups or small samples? What are the limitations of those studies that justify the current analysis? Furthermore, the authors should highlight what is novel in their approach using ELSA-Brasil—whether it's the follow-up period, analytical strategy, or focus on particular subgroups or variables.

Response: We clarified the knowledge gaps, highlighting that previous studies have limitations regarding representativeness and sample size.

Comments: Importantly, the rationale states the need for more representative and large-scale studies on HF incidence in Brazil, yet the study population consists solely of federal public servants. This creates a conceptual inconsistency. The authors are encouraged to revise this section by emphasizing the relevance of investigating HF incidence and associated factors within a population that has specific characteristics (e.g., higher educational level, job stability, access to healthcare), while avoiding overgeneralization to the broader Brazilian population.

Response: We emphasized the uniqueness of the ELSA-Brasil cohort, underlining the specific characteristics of the studied population and avoiding generalizations.

Comments: Lastly, the stated objective in the introduction should match the one presented in the abstract. Consistency is necessary.

Response: We ensured that the objective in the abstract and introduction are aligned.

Reference 15 has been removed:

15. Oliveira GMM, Brant LCC, Polanczyk CA, Malta DC, Biolo A, Nascimento BR, Souza MFM, et al. Estatística cardiovascular – Brasil 2023. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2024;121(2):e20240079.

Reference 15 has been replaced with a more recent one:

15. Heidemann AI, Santos ABS, Bittencourt MS, Ribeiro ALP, Rohde LE, Lotufo PA, et al. Prevalence and mortality of heart failure stages in a free-living older adult population: data from the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil). J Am Heart Assoc. 2025;14(5):e038993. doi:10.1161/JAHA.124.038993.

Reference 30 has been renumbered to Reference 16:

30 → 16. Ciapponi A, Alcaraz A, Calderón M, Matta MG, Chaparro M, Soto N, et al. Burden of heart failure in Latin America: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2016 Nov;69(11):1051-1060. English, Spanish. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2016.04.054.

Methods:

The methods section should be revised and aligned with the STROBE checklist for cohort studies. This includes a clear logical sequence and the proper description of key aspects such as the outcome definition, inclusion/exclusion criteria, bias control strategies, and handling of follow-up losses.

Response: The Methods section was reorganized into clear subsections to meet the STROBE recommendations, including: outcome definition, inclusion and exclusion criteria, strategies to minimize bias, and handling of follow-up losses.

Discussion:

The discussion also contains outdated references—these should be replaced with more recent epidemiological data.

Response: We removed outdated references and replaced them with more recent literature, specifically removing references 29, 31, and 34.

29.Agarwal SK, Chambless LE, Ballantyne CM, Astor B, Bertoni AG, Chang PP, et al. Prediction of incident heart failure in general practice: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Circ Heart Fail. 2012;5:422–429.

31. Moraes RS, Fuchs FD, Moreira LB, Wiehe M, Pereira GM, Fuchs SC. Risk factors for cardiovascular disease in a Brazilian population-based cohort study. Int J Cardiol. 2003;90(2-3):205-11. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5273(02)00556-9.

34. Chang PP, Wruck LM, Shahar E, et al. Trends in hospitalizations and survival of acute decompensated heart failure in four US communities (2005-2014): ARIC Study Community Surveillance. Circulation. 2018;138(1):12–24.

Comments:

Lines 259–261: The statement that "Factors such as sex, age group, hypertension, and socioeconomic conditions have been associated with the development of the disease" is too superficial. The discussion should explain why these factors are associated, based on literature and the study’s findings.

Response: The Discussion section was expanded to provide a deeper explanation of the association of these factors with heart failure, based on current literature and the results of our study.

Comments: Each new topic in the discussion should begin in a separate paragraph. For instance, line 262 discusses sex, while line 265 abruptly shifts to age within the same paragraph. This should be revised throughout the manuscript, including in the introduction.

Response: We revised the organization of the Discussion so that each topic has its own paragraph, improving clarity and flow. The Introduction was also reviewed to ensure structural coherence.

Comments: The discussion on the lack of association between sex and HF is underdeveloped. Merely stating that the findings are consistent with a previous study is not analytically sufficient. The authors should explore whether this null result was expected, what hypotheses might explain it in the context of the studied population, whether confounders were adequately controlled for, and what implications this has for the literature or for health policy. The same applies to age, race/skin color, overweight, and obesity. The discussion should address the implications and potential explanations for these findings—not just describe them.

Response: We expanded the discussion regarding the lack of association with sex by exploring possible hypotheses, control of confounding factors, and implications for the literature and public policies. Similarly, we further developed the discussion on age, race/skin color, overweight, and obesity, highlighting potential explanations and their relevance to public health.

Comments: Lines 269–274: This paragraph largely repeats the study results and lacks interpretation. The discussion should avoid unnecessary repetition of findings already presented in the results section and instead focus on their interpretation and relevance. Furthermore, race/skin color is mentioned descriptively but not discussed in depth, which should be corrected.

Response: We extensively revised the discussion, removing repetitions of the results and focusing on the interpretation and relevance of the findings. The discussion on race/skin color was deepened, considering relevant literature, potential biases, and implications for health policies.

Limitations:

While the limitation related to the cohort composition (public servants) is valid, it should be complemented by other potential sources of bias and methodological limitations, such as: selection bias (healthy worker effect); loss to follow-up; reliance on self-reported variables; relatively low number of incident cases to date; follow-up period that may not capture late-onset HF cases.

Response: We expanded the Limitations section to include these issues, reinforcing transparency regarding potential biases and methodological limitations.

Conclusion:

It is recommended to remove the term “vulnerable groups,” as not all of the groups mentioned (e.g., older adults, individuals with obesity) fit this definition in public health.

The phrase “key predictors at different stages of follow-up” is vague and should be clarified—what predictors, and during which stages? The conclusion should be more objective and better aligned with the study’s main findings, emphasizing their practical and scientific implications.

Response: The term “vulnerable groups” was removed. The conclusion was reformulated to explicitly state the identified predictors, detailing the follow-up periods during which they were observed, and emphasizing the practical and scientific implications of the results.

Reviewer #1: The manuscript presents a valuable contribution to the understanding of heart failure in the ELSA-Brasil cohort. The research question is important, the methodology is rigorous, and the statistical analysis is appropriate for the data. The results are presented clearly, and the discussion is insightful. However, I believe some minor revisions could strengthen the manuscript further.

Methods Section: The methodology is generally clear, but I suggest providing more detail on how heart failure was diagnosed and classified within the cohort. Clarifying whether the diagnosis was made based on clinical criteria, imaging, or biomarkers would improve the reproducibility of the study.

Response to Reviewer 1: We appreciate the suggestion. The Methods section was revised to include a more comprehensive description of the criteria used for diagnosing heart failure (HF) in the ELSA-Brasil cohort. At baseline (2008–2010), HF identification was based on participants’ self-report through the Medical History Questionnaire. During follow-up (visits 2, 3, and continuous surveillance), incident HF cases were detected through active health event monitoring, detailed medical record review, and clinical validation conducted by specialized committees. This approach considered clinical criteria, use of specific medications, and complementary exams, ensuring greater accuracy in identifying new cases.

Statistical Analysis: The statistical methods are well explained. One suggestion is to include a more detailed explanation of how missing data were handled in the analyses, as this information is crucial for evaluating the robustness of the results.

Response to Reviewer 1: We included an explanation in the Statistical Analysis section regarding the handling of missing data. As suggested, we described that the analyses were conducted based on available data (complete case analysis), and a sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the potential impact of loss to follow-up and variables with missing data.

Conclusion: The conclusions are well supported by the data, but I would encourage the authors to discuss more explicitly how these findings could inform public health strategies in Brazil or similar settings, particularly regarding prevention and management of heart failure.

Response to Reviewer 1: As suggested, we revised the Conclusion section to include a more direct discussion of the implications of the findings for public health policies. We specified that the factors associated with heart failure incidence identified in this study — such as abdominal obesity and older age — may support targeted screening strategies and preventive interventions in populations with similar characteristics, contributing to more effective planning and management of the disease within the Brazilian healthcare system.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0329113.s003.docx (24.8KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Alanna Gomes da Silva

11 Jul 2025

Incidence and risk factors for heart failure in the ELSA-Brasil cohort

PONE-D-25-07478R1

Dear Dr. Lédo,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager®  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Alanna Gomes da Silva, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Alanna Gomes da Silva

PONE-D-25-07478R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Lédo,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

You will receive further instructions from the production team, including instructions on how to review your proof when it is ready. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few days to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

You will receive an invoice from PLOS for your publication fee after your manuscript has reached the completed accept phase. If you receive an email requesting payment before acceptance or for any other service, this may be a phishing scheme. Learn how to identify phishing emails and protect your accounts at https://explore.plos.org/phishing.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Alanna Gomes da Silva

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. Analysis of Age and Waist Circumference in Incident Heart Failure Cases.

    This file contains box plots and statistical analyses of baseline age and waist circumference comparing participants with and without incident heart failure at visits 2 and 3 of the ELSA-Brasil cohort. It includes tests of normality (Shapiro-Wilk), justification for using non-parametric tests (Mann-Whitney), and presentation of median values.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0329113.s001.docx (889.2KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0329113.s003.docx (24.8KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES