Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1994 Nov;220(5):617–625. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199411000-00004

A new minimally invasive technique for cholecystectomy. Subxiphoid "minimal stress triangle": microceliotomy.

N S Tyagi 1, M C Meredith 1, J C Lumb 1, R G Cacdac 1, C C Vanterpool 1, K R Rayls 1, W D Zerega 1, A Silbergleit 1
PMCID: PMC1234449  PMID: 7979609

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors devised a minimally invasive technique for cholecystectomy via microceliotomy that provides safety attainable with the open conventional approach and postoperative results comparable to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has evolved as a minimally invasive outpatient procedure. Patients can return rapidly to preoperative status with minimal postoperative morbidity and pain, and the small scar size is cosmetically desirable. Unfortunately, there are reports of serious intraoperative complications, including injury to blood vessels, bowel, and the bile ducts, caused by failure to identify structures properly. The conventional cholecystectomy technique currently is relegated to patients on whom the laparoscopic procedure cannot be performed. METHODS: Cholecystectomy was performed through a 3-cm transverse high subxiphoid incision in the "minimal stress triangle." The location, anterior to Calot's triangle, was critical in providing a direct vertical view of the biliary ducts during dissection. Direct view cholecystectomy was performed using endoscopic instruments without pneumoperitoneum. Postoperative data were compared with both laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy results. RESULTS: Using the microceliotomy technique in the ambulatory setting, cholecystectomy was performed successfully in 99.3% (N = 143) of cases. Biliary leakage beyond the third postoperative day was caused by failure of clips or obstruction to bile flow. The postoperative morbidity, acceptability of scar, and analgesic requirements compare favorably with other techniques. Microceliotomy is cost effective. Portal hypertension is a contraindication for this procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The microceliotomy approach offers a viable, safe, and cost-effective alternative to the laparoscopic technique for cholecystectomy, especially when facilities for laparoscopy are not available or when the laparoscopic procedure cannot be performed.

Full text

PDF
617

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barkun J. S., Barkun A. N., Meakins J. L. Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: the Canadian experience. The McGill Gallstone Treatment Group. Am J Surg. 1993 Apr;165(4):455–458. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80940-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berci G., Sackier J. M., Paz-Partlow M. Routine or selected intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Am J Surg. 1991 Mar;161(3):355–360. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90597-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clavien P. A., Sanabria J. R., Mentha G., Borst F., Buhler L., Roche B., Cywes R., Tibshirani R., Rohner A., Strasberg S. M. Recent results of elective open cholecystectomy in a North American and a European center. Comparison of complications and risk factors. Ann Surg. 1992 Dec;216(6):618–626. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199212000-00002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cuschieri A., Dubois F., Mouiel J., Mouret P., Becker H., Buess G., Trede M., Troidl H. The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1991 Mar;161(3):385–387. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90603-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cuschieri A. Minimal access surgery and the future of interventional laparoscopy. Am J Surg. 1991 Mar;161(3):404–407. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90608-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Davidoff A. M., Pappas T. N., Murray E. A., Hilleren D. J., Johnson R. D., Baker M. E., Newman G. E., Cotton P. B., Meyers W. C. Mechanisms of major biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 1992 Mar;215(3):196–202. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199203000-00002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Deziel D. J., Millikan K. W., Economou S. G., Doolas A., Ko S. T., Airan M. C. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases. Am J Surg. 1993 Jan;165(1):9–14. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80397-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Flowers J. L., Bailey R. W., Scovill W. A., Zucker K. A. The Baltimore experience with laparoscopic management of acute cholecystitis. Am J Surg. 1991 Mar;161(3):388–392. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90604-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Flowers J. L., Zucker K. A., Graham S. M., Scovill W. A., Imbembo A. L., Bailey R. W. Laparoscopic cholangiography. Results and indications. Ann Surg. 1992 Mar;215(3):209–216. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199203000-00004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gadacz T. R., Talamini M. A., Lillemoe K. D., Yeo C. J. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Clin North Am. 1990 Dec;70(6):1249–1262. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)45282-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gerber A., Apt M. K. The case against routine operative cholangiography. Am J Surg. 1982 Jun;143(6):734–736. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(82)90048-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hunter J. G. Laser or electrocautery for laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Am J Surg. 1991 Mar;161(3):345–349. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90595-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hunter J. G. Laser use in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Clin North Am. 1992 Jun;72(3):655–664. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)45739-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Legorreta A. P., Silber J. H., Costantino G. N., Kobylinski R. W., Zatz S. L. Increased cholecystectomy rate after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JAMA. 1993 Sep 22;270(12):1429–1432. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Moossa A. R., Easter D. W., Van Sonnenberg E., Casola G., D'Agostino H. Laparoscopic injuries to the bile duct. A cause for concern. Ann Surg. 1992 Mar;215(3):203–208. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199203000-00003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nelson M. T., Nakashima M., Mulvihill S. J. How secure are laparoscopically placed clips? An in vitro and in vivo study. Arch Surg. 1992 Jun;127(6):718–720. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1992.01420060094014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ponsky J. L. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1991 Mar;161(3):393–395. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90605-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Zucker K. A., Bailey R. W., Gadacz T. R., Imbembo A. L. Laparoscopic guided cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1991 Jan;161(1):36–44. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90358-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES