Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2025 Aug 12;8(8):e2526396. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.26396

Severe Cardiovascular Sequelae in Adults After Kawasaki Disease

Yoshihide Mitani 1,, Michikazu Nakai 2, Etsuko Tsuda 3, Toshihiro Tamura 4, Yasutsugu Shiono 5, Hiroyoshi Yokoi 6, Hiroyuki Ohashi 1, Hirofumi Sawada 1, Masahiro Hirayama 1
PMCID: PMC12344531  PMID: 40794412

Abstract

This cohort study evaluates the incidence and outcomes of cardiovascular hospitalizations among adults in Japan with a history of Kawasaki disease.

Introduction

Kawasaki disease (KD), first described in 1967, is an acute childhood vasculitis that can have lifelong coronary sequelae.1,2,3 Although most children now receive timely therapy, severe coronary aneurysms still place affected patients at risk for serious long-term cardiac complications. Patients with large coronary aneurysms may experience acute myocardial infarction shortly after the acute phase or remain asymptomatic for decades, only developing ischemic events and requiring revascularization in adulthood.1,2,3,4,5 With the earliest KD cohorts now reaching their 30s and 40s, clinicians increasingly encounter late cardiovascular complications, including acute coronary syndrome (ACS), chronic coronary syndrome, ischemic cardiomyopathy, heart failure, and arrhythmias. Nonetheless, robust epidemiological data and clear prognostic factors for severe adult cardiovascular sequelae remain scarce, particularly concerning the continuity of care from childhood into adulthood.

Methods

This cohort study was approved by the Ethics Committees of Mie University Hospital and the National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, with a waiver of informed consent. Reporting followed the STROBE guideline. Additional methods are detailed in the eMethods in Supplement 1. We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using data from the Japanese Registry of All Cardiac and Vascular Diseases–Diagnosis Procedure Combination (JROAD-DPC), which compiles clinical records from cardiovascular hospitals nationwide in Japan.6 We included adult patients (≥15 years) hospitalized between April 2013 and March 2022 with severe KD-related cardiovascular events who were identified using the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10). Emergency and nonreferral admissions served as proxies for disrupted continuity of care. Outcomes were in-hospital death (primary) and intensive care unit (ICU) admission (secondary). Multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression (random intercept for hospital) generated odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs for in-hospital mortality or ICU admission using 2 models: model 1, age, sex, and emergency admission; and model 2, age, sex, and nonreferral admission. Stata version 16.1 (StataCorp) was used. Statistical significance was set at a 2-sided P < .05.

Results

Our analysis included 798 hospitalizations (median [IQR] age, 37 [23-44] years; 74.4% male). Clinical presentations were categorized as ACS (19.7%), percutaneous coronary intervention (13.0%), coronary artery bypass grafting (14.2%), and heart failure or arrhythmia (53.1%) (Table). The median (IQR) BMI (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) was 22.9 (20.3-25.6); 197 patients (24.7%) currently smoked, rising to 59 of 157 (37.6%) among those with ACS. At discharge, 71.4% received antiplatelet therapy (81.5% among ACS cases), 25.2% received systemic anticoagulation, and just 31.1% were started on a statin. Most admissions occurred at teaching hospitals (92.2%). Emergency and nonreferral admissions accounted for 33.0% and 16.0% of admissions, respectively. The overall ICU admission was 27.6%, and in-hospital mortality was 1.3%. Age distribution was bimodal, peaking at younger than 20 years and between the ages of 35 and 39 years, whereas ACS showed only the older peak (Figure). Multivariable analysis revealed that emergency admissions (OR, 8.49; 95% CI, 1.80-40.04; P = .007) and nonreferral admissions (OR, 6.69; 95% CI, 1.68-26.60; P = .007) were associated with increased mortality risk and that nonreferral admission (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.08-2.78; P = .02) was associated with increased risk of ICU admission.

Table. Demographic Characteristics.

Characteristic Participants, No. (%)
Overall (N = 798) ACS (n = 157) PCI (n = 104) CABG (n = 113) HF or arrhythmia (n = 424)
Age, y
No. with available data 798 157 104 113 424
Median (IQR) 37.0 (23.0-46.0) 39.0 (32.0-47.0) 38.0 (27.0-46.0) 39.0 (29.0-45.0) 34.0 (20.0-45.0)
Sex
Male 594 (74.4) 124 (79.0) 79 (76.0) 92 (81.4) 299 (70.5)
Female 204 (25.6) 33 (21.0) 25 (24.0) 21 (18.6) 125 (29.5)
BMI
No. with available data 777 150 103 113 412
Median (IQR) 22.9 (20.3-25.6) 24.4 (20.9-26.9) 23.1 (21.1-26.8) 23.5 (20.8-26.1) 22.1 (19.8-25.1)
Current smoking 197 (24.7) 59 (37.6) 31 (29.8) 27 (23.9) 80 (18.9)
Treatment
HF or arrhythmia
Any 718 (90.0) 117 (74.5) 64 (61.5) 113 (100) 24 (100)
HF 474 (59.4) 101 (64.3) 44 (42.3) 113 (100) 216 (50.9)
Arrhythmia 535 (67.0) 89 (56.7) 49 (47.1) 109 (96.5) 288 (67.9)
PCI
Any 191 (23.9) 85 (54.1) 104 (100) 2 (1.8) 0
POBA 73 (9.1) 41 (26.1) 31 (29.8) 1 (0.9) 0
Stenting 73 (9.1) 36 (22.9) 37 (35.6) 0 0
PTCRA 38 (4.8) 3 (1.9) 34 (32.7) 1 (0.9) 0
Intracoronary thrombolysis 2 (0.3) 1 (0.6) 1 (1.0) 0 0
Aspiration thrombectomy 13 (1.6) 13 (8.3) 0 0 0
CABG 148 (18.4) 34 (21.7) 0 113 (100) 0
Ablation 31 (3.9) 0 (0) 2 (1.9) 0 29 (6.8)
IABP 54 (6.8) 42 (26.8) 2 (1.9) 7 (6.2) 3 (0.2)
PCPS 11 (1.4) 8 (5.1) 0 1 (0.9) 2 (0.5)
Oral medication at discharge
Antihypertension 399 (50.0) 97 (61.8) 43 (41.3) 92 (81.4) 167 (39.4)
Antidiabetes 17 (2.1) 3 (1.9) 3 (2.9) 2 (1.8) 9 (2.1)
Anticoagulant
Any 201 (25.2) 62 (39.5) 1 2 (11.5) 34 (30.1) 93 (21.9)
Warfarin 173 (21.7) 57 (36.4) 9 (8.7) 29 (25.7) 78 (18.4)
DOAC or NOAC 28 (3.5) 5 (3.2) 3 (2.9) 5 (4.4) 15 (3.5)
Antiplatelet
Any 570 (71.4) 128 (81.5) 90 (86.5) 104 (92.0) 248 (58.5)
Aspirin 454 (56.9) 109 (69.4) 64 (61.5) 98 (86.7) 183 (43.2)
Other antiplatelet 351 (44.0) 85 (54.1) 86 (82.7) 45 (39.8) 135 (31.8)
DAPT 235 (29.4) 66 (42.0) 60 (57.7) 39 (34.5) 70 (16.5)
Statin 248 (31.1) 71 (45.2) 38 (36.5) 49 (43.4) 90 (21.2)
Socioeconomic parameters
Hospital stay
No. with available data 798 157 104 113 424
Median (IQR), d 6.0 (3.0-16.0) 13.0 (4.0-20.0) 4.0 (3.0-4.0) 17.0 (14.0-22.0) 4.0 (3.0-12.0)
Hospital charge
No. with available data 797 157 104 113 423
Median (IQR), $ 7291.3 (1879.9-16 134.1) 10 890.7 (3885.0-20 112.9) 8366.7 (6692.3-9902.1) 18 788.7 (16 515.4-23 310.0) 2730.0 (1255.3-8558.3)
Hospital parameters
CVIT center 739 (92.2) 138 (87.9) 99 (95.2) 111 (98.2) 388 (91.5)
ACHD center 322 (40.4) 35 (22.3) 37 (35.6) 67 (59.3) 183 (43.2)
Beds, median (IQR), No. 612.0 (396.0-780.0) 460.0 (300.0-694.0) 645.5 (403.5-749.0) 612.0 (481.0-800.0) 613.0 (437.0-800.0)
Mode of hospitalization
Emergency 263 (33.0) 126 (80.3) 6 (5.8) 5 (4.4) 126 (29.7)
No referral 128 (16.0) 58 (36.9) 10 (9.6) 10 (8.8) 50 (11.8)
Outcome parameters
ICU care 220 (27.6) 67 (42.7) 8 (7.7) 105 (92.9) 40 (9.4)
Hospital mortality 11 (1.4) 4 (2.5) 0 2 (1.8) 5 (1.2)

Abbreviations: ACHD, adult congenital heart disease; ACS, acute coronary syndrome; BMI, body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared); CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; CVIT, Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics; DAPT, dual antiplatelet therapy; DOAC, direct oral anticoagulant; HF, heart failure; IAPB, intra-aortic balloon pumping; ICU, intensive care unit; NOAC, novel oral anticoagulants; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; PCPS, percutaneous cardiopulmonary support; POBA, plain old balloon angioplasty; PTCRA, percutaneous transluminal coronary rotational atherectomy.

Figure. Age Distribution in the Overall Cohort, the Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) Group, the Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) Group, the Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Group, and the Heart Failure or Arrhythmia Group.

Figure.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first nationwide JROAD-DPC analysis of hospitalized adult patients with a history of KD. We found that severe cardiovascular events clustered in young adults without obesity, especially men, with a second surge in their late 30s. One-quarter of participants smoked, and fewer than one-third were discharged on statins, underscoring unmet opportunities for risk factor modification. Disrupted follow-up, reflected by emergency and nonreferral admissions, was independently associated with worse outcomes. Limitations include the absence of a denominator of all adult KD survivors, lack of an age-matched non-KD comparator, reliance on a single ICD-10 code whose sensitivity and specificity for historical KD are unknown, and unavailability of outpatient data or longitudinal follow-up. Findings are therefore descriptive and hypothesis-generating but highlight critical gaps in lifelong care.

In conclusion, the present findings emphasize the critical need for structured lifelong follow-up programs, systematic health care transition strategies, and increased awareness among adult health care clinicians. Prospective registries incorporating comprehensive KD cohorts and systematic risk factor modification are warranted to clarify absolute risk and improve clinical trajectories.

Supplement 1.

eMethods.

eReferences.

Supplement 2.

Data Sharing Statement

References

  • 1.McCrindle BW, Rowley AH, Newburger JW, et al. ; American Heart Association Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease Committee of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention . Diagnosis, treatment, and long-term management of Kawasaki disease: a scientific statement for health professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135(17):e927-e999. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000484 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fukazawa R, Kobayashi J, Ayusawa M, et al. ; Japanese Circulation Society Joint Working Group . JCS/JSCS 2020 guideline on diagnosis and management of cardiovascular sequelae in Kawasaki disease. Circ J. 2020;84(8):1348-1407. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-1094 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jone PN, Tremoulet A, Choueiter N, et al. ; American Heart Association Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease Committee of the Council on Lifelong Congenital Heart Disease and Heart Health in the Young; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; and Council on Clinical Cardiology . Update on diagnosis and management of Kawasaki disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2024;150(23):e481-e500. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001295 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fukazawa R, Kobayashi T, Mikami M, et al. Nationwide survey of patients with giant coronary aneurysm secondary to Kawasaki disease 1999-2010 in Japan. Circ J. 2017;82(1):239-246. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0433 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mitani Y, Tsuda E, Kato H, et al. Emergence and characterization of acute coronary syndrome in adults after confirmed or missed history of Kawasaki disease in Japan: a Japanese nationwide survey. Front Pediatr. 2019;7:275. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00275 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yasuda S, Miyamoto Y, Ogawa H. Current status of cardiovascular medicine in the aging society of Japan. Circulation. 2018;138(10):965-967. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035858 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement 1.

eMethods.

eReferences.

Supplement 2.

Data Sharing Statement


Articles from JAMA Network Open are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES