Skip to main content
mBio logoLink to mBio
. 2025 Jun 24;16(8):e01570-25. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01570-25

Interferons in human inborn errors of disease

Laurel Stine 1,#, Sara Cahill 1,#, Fiachra Humphries 1,
Editor: Jacob Yount2
PMCID: PMC12345149  PMID: 40552831

ABSTRACT

Interferons are ubiquitously produced cytokines with diverse cellular functions. IFNs play essential functions in responding to viral infections and tumorigenesis by initiating an interferon-stimulated gene response and triggering the adaptive immune response. However, excessive, prolonged IFN production disrupts cellular homeostasis and can lead to an array of severe inflammatory conditions. Due to developments in whole genome sequencing and elucidation of key signaling pathways, excessive IFN production and its associated interferon-stimulated gene expression signature is now an established molecular diagnostic of Mendelian inborn errors in immunity termed “interferonopathies.” In addition, identification of Mendelian loss-of-function mutations in critical mediators of the IFN response has been identified as the causal factors of immune deficiencies and susceptibility to viral infections. Thus, IFNs and their preceding signaling pathways now represent major therapeutic targets. In this review, we outline the existing evidence on the role IFNs play in human disease and the genetic mechanisms that underlie excessive IFN production or immune deficiencies.

KEYWORDS: innate immunity, interferons, viruses, TLR signaling, cGAS STING

INTRODUCTION

Interferons (IFNs) are a family of pleiotropic cytokines traditionally associated with anti-viral and anti-tumor immunities (1). IFNs are ubiquitously produced in response to infection, damage, or cellular stress, following the detection of pattern-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) by pathogen-recognition receptors (PRRs), such as toll-like receptors (TLRs) and nucleic acid sensors (2, 3). IFNs are categorized into three distinct subsets: type I, type II, and type III (4). Type I IFN can be ubiquitously expressed by many cell types, and type II IFN is typically produced by immune cells. Type III IFNs, which distinctly signal through the type III receptor, are produced at mucosal surfaces such as respiratory epithelial cells and intestinal epithelial cells. Although all subgroups display distinct functions and tissue-specific expression, their downstream signaling cascades are mediated through a class of adaptor proteins and transcription factors known as Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT), which trigger the transcription of IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs). ISGs are a diverse set of proteins that can restrict viral replication by directly targeting numerous elements of viral entry and replication mechanisms (5). Additionally, IFNs can stimulate the activation of CD8 T cells, regulate APC function, stimulate antibody production from B cells, and induce the production of chemokines that can promote the recruitment of immune cells and tissue damage (6, 7). Although IFNs play important roles in host immunity, their potent nature requires significant regulation by several checkpoint mechanisms to limit pathogenic effects (8, 9).

Many monogenic autoinflammatory diseases have been attributed to single-gene mutations in innate immune-signaling pathways that present early in life as sterile inflammation, mirroring symptoms of infection (10). Excessive IFN production and associated ISG signatures have been identified as important indicators of monogenic immune-mediated diseases termed “interferonpathies” (10, 11). Interferonopathies are a form of inherited autoinflammatory disease characterized by constitutive activation of the IFNAR pathway (10, 12). Due to the recent advances in genome sequencing, the majority of interferonopathies have been attributed to the loss-of-function (LOF) or gain-of-function (GOF) monogenic mutations in proteins that regulate the detection of nucleic acids or IFNAR signaling (1320). Despite common underlying signaling defects, specific in-born errors can lead to an array of clinical manifestations. In addition, the sporadic, periodic nature of some interferonopathies creates challenges for treatment. Thus, further understanding of the molecular and cell-specific signaling events that precede IFN production and the ISG signature is essential for differentiating DNA- and RNA-driven disease and developing more targeted precision therapies.

In this review, we discuss the key innate immune receptors and signaling events that precede IFN production, the underlying genetic causes of excessive IFN production, and the ISG signature as a danger signal in human disease. We also discuss the existing evidence for ISG signatures in other non-Mendelian autoimmune diseases and explore the danger signals that precede excessive ISG activation. Finally, we describe the signaling events and hierarchy of clinical symptoms within a group of immunodeficiencies resulting from LOF mutations PRR pathways.

PRODUCTION OF IFN

Toll-like receptors

TLRs are a conserved family of PPRs that induces the production of IFNs following the detection of PAMPs (2). Plasma membrane and endosomal TLRs signal via the TIR adaptors Myd88, TRIF, and TRAM to induce type I IFN in response to infection (21). TLR-4 is a lipopolysaccharide (LPS) sensor localized to the plasma membrane. Following the detection of LPS, TLR-4 is endocytosed via its interaction with the adaptor proteins TRIF and TRAM (22). TRIF and TRAM recruit the E3-ligase TRAF3 to facilitate TBK1 activation and IRF3 phosphorylation (23). Phosphorylated dimeric IRF3 then translocates to the nucleus and associates with IRF-binding elements in the promoter of anti-viral genes, including IFNβ (24). Expression of IFNβ occurs following assembly of the IFNβ enhanceosome. A heterodimer of NF-κB p50 and p65 and a heterodimer of the basic region-leucine zipper (bZIP) proteins ATF-2 and c-jun bind to PRDII and PRDIV, respectively. PRDIII and PRDI are recognized by a protein complex containing IFN regulatory factor 3 (IRF-3) (25).

Endosomal TLRs (TLR3,7, 8, and 9) detect nucleic acids, including DNA and RNA, enabling a broad-spectrum immune response to a wide range of pathogenic bacteria and viruses (26). Endosomal TLRs are synthesized in the ER and transported to endosomes via the chaperone protein UNC93B1. UNC931B is required for correct folding of endosomal TLRs and ligand recognition. TLR-7 remains bound to UNC93B1 at the endosome in association with syntenin-1 to internalize TLR-7 in micro-vesicles and restrict TLR-7 activation by single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) (27). TLR-8 is primarily activated by RNA degradation products, specifically catabolic uridine and purine-2′,3′-cyclophosphate-terminated oligoribonucleotides, generated by the lysosomal endoribonuclease RNase T2 (28). In contrast, TLR-9 is regulated differently and is released by UNC93B1 in order to bind CpG DNA and trigger downstream signaling (26). These unique trafficking mechanisms play important roles in limiting TLR-7- and 9-dependent autoimmune conditions (6, 29). UNC93B1 deficiency results in impaired TLR-3, 7, and 9 responses and hyper-susceptibility to viral infections (30). In pDCs, activation of TLR-7 and TLR-9 induce IFN-α expression via the transcription factor IRF7. Following activation, TLR-7 and TLR-9 recruit a complex comprised of MyD88 IRAK1/4 and the E3 ligase TRAF6 (31, 32). TRAF6-mediated activation of IKK-α leads to the phosphorylation and translocation of IRF7 to initiate IFNα expression (33) (Fig. 1A).

Fig 1.

Schematic presents TLR, cGAS-STING, and RIG-I-MAVS signaling pathways leading to IRF3, IRF7, and NFκB activation. Resulting transcription induces type I interferon and cytokine expression via phosphorylated transcription factors.

(A) TLR Signaling and IRF transcription factors promote IFN production. TLRs located at the plasma membrane or endosomes detect conserved microbial patterns, leading to the recruitment of TIR-containing adaptor proteins and the activation of Myd88-dependent or -independent signaling cascades that result in IFN expression via the transcription factors IRF3 and IRF7. Recruitment of Myd88 triggers the activation of TRAF6 and the IKK complex, which facilitates IRF7 activation and expression of IFN-α. TRIF and TRAM recruitment induces the auto-ubiquitination of TRAF3 and activation of the kinases TBK1 and IKKε. TBK1 and IKKε phosphorylate IRF3, which translocates and induces the expression of type I IFN-β. Signaling via TLR3 occurs in a Myd88-independent manner via the adaptors TRIF, TRAF3, TBK1, and IKKε. (B) DNA- and RNA-sensing pathways and type I IFN production. Schematic representation detailing the detection and signaling mediated via nucleic acid sensors. Detection of dsDNA results in a conformational change and the activation of cGAS enzymatic activity. cGAS synthesizes cGAMP from the precursors ATP and GTP. cGAMP binds to STING dimers at the ER membrane, which triggers conformational changes to facilitate STING oligomerization and translocation to the ER–Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC) and Golgi, where STING recruits TBK1. STING-mediated TBK1 recruitment leads to TBK1 autophosphorylation, STING phosphorylation recruitment of IRF3. Phosphorylated IRF3 can then dimerize and translocate to the nucleus to induce the expression of type I interferons. In addition to IRF3, STING also promotes NF-κB activity and the formation of LC3-bound autophagosomes through a non-canonical autophagy pathway. RIG-I and MDA5 can sense immunostimulatory RNA that enters the cytosol, from viral or endogenous sources. Following the detection of RNA, RIG-I or Mda5 undergoes conformational changes to allow exposure and multimerization of CARD domains. CARD–CARD multimers form interactions with the downstream adaptor protein MAVS. MAVS is localized to the outer membranes of mitochondria and peroxisomes. Following activation, MAVS forms prion-like oligomers, which facilitate the activation of TBK1 IKKε, which can activate IRF3 and NF-κB to induce the expression of type I IFNs and proinflammatory cytokines.

Unlike all other TLRs, TLR3, which is activated by double-stranded RNA, signals in a Myd88-independent manner via the adaptor protein TRIF. Downstream of TLR-3, TRIF recruits the E3 ligase TRAF3 and initiates the activation of TBK1- and IRF3-induced IFN expression (23, 34). Endosomal TLRs are essential mediators of human anti-viral immunity. Indeed, loss-of-function mutations in components of the endosomal TLR-signaling pathway result in susceptibility to herpes simplex virus infection (HSV1) (6, 30, 3537). In contrast, endosomal TLRs have also been implicated in the pathogenesis of autoimmune conditions such as SLE (29, 38, 39)

NUCLEIC ACID SENSORS

cGAS/STING signaling

Cyclic GMP-AMP (cGAMP) synthase, cGAS, is an innate immune sensor of cytosolic DNA (40). Binding of cGAS to pathogen- or host-derived dsDNA promotes a conformational change activating cGAS catalytic activity and the conversion of ATP and GTP into the non-canonical cyclic dinucleotide cGAMP (40, 41). cGAMP then binds and activates the stimulator of interferon genes (STING) (3, 40). Following cGAMP binding, TBK1 is recruited to the C-terminal tail of STING, which induces auto-activation and phosphorylation of TBK1, followed by phosphorylation of STING on Ser366 (42). STING can also be activated directly via bacterial-derived cyclic dinucleotides (43). Conformational changes in STING promote its oligomerization and induction of downstream-signaling pathways, such as type I IFN, NFκB, and autophagy (34, 4447). Upon activation, STING is trafficked from the ER to the Golgi and finally to the lysosome for degradation. Given the damaging consequences of DNA accumulation, several regulatory mechanisms exist to restrict spontaneous cGAS STING signaling. Under resting conditions, STING translocation is restricted by the ER protein STIM1 and by COPI vesicles via the adaptor protein SURF4 (48, 49). Autophagy can also be activated downstream of STING, which results in the phosphorylation of STING by ULK1 to limit pathway activation (50) In addition, several regulatory mechanisms restrict cGAS binding to host DNA. cGAS is localized to both the cytosol and nuclear compartment in close proximity to genomic DNA (51). In the nucleus, cGAS is tightly bound to chromatin and locked in an inactive state whereby steric hindrance prevents the association of its DNA binding domain with genomic DNA (5155). Disruption of STING trafficking and cGAS localization underpin the mechanisms of such as COPA syndrome, SAVI, and certain forms of AGS (5658) (Fig. 1B). In addition to cGAS and STING, other dsDNA sensors play important roles in responding to pathogens. The STING-independent DNA-sensing pathway (SIDSP) is mediated by DNA-PK in human cells to initiate a broad anti-viral response. (59)

RIG-I/Mda5 signaling

RIG-I-like receptors (RLRs) receptors are cytosolic sensors of viral RNA. The RLR family of sensors is comprised of RIG-I, Mda5, and LGP2 (60). RLRs sense unique viral RNA products from viral species such as picornaviruses, flaviviruses, and paramyxoviruses (61). Furthermore, RLRs are activated by host-derived RNAs (62). Upon detection of viral RNA, the RLRs recruit the adaptor protein mitochondrial antiviral signaling (MAVS) (63). Both RIG-I and Mda5 contain an N-terminal caspase recruitment domain (CARD), which facilitates the recruitment of MAVS. Although RIG-I and Mda5 have conserved homology, the specific RNA types and structures they detect are different. RIG-I specifically detects RNA molecules bearing a triphosphate (PPP) group at their 5′ end (64). 5′-PPP RNA structures are found in viral RNA molecules but not in the majority of host cytosolic RNAs, enabling RIG-I to be highly selective in detecting pathogen RNA. In contrast to RIG-I, Mda5 can be activated by viral, host, and synthetic RNA with length and secondary structure of the RNA being essential factors in Mda5 RNA sensing (41). Indeed, Mda5 is activated by higher-order dsRNA molecules (65). LGP2 was originally identified as a negative regulator of RIG-I and Mda5 signaling due to the lack of CARD domain and its ability to bind viral RNA with high affinity. Subsequent studies identified a key role for LGP2 in mediating RIG and Mda5 signaling (60). Ubiquitin chains play important roles in both TLR and Mda5 activation. K63-linked ubiquitination of RIG-I by TRIM25 is essential for the activation and recruitment of MAVS (66). RIG-I is also negatively regulated by the E3 ligases Cbl, RNF122, and RNF125 via K48-linked ubiquitination (67, 68). Linear ubiquitination by the LUBAC complex has been shown to destabilize the RIG-I TRIM25 interaction to suppress activation (69). Mda5 ubiquitination by TRIM65 is a prerequisite for Mda5 oligomerization. In addition, activation of RIG-I and Mda5 can also be achieved via unanchored ubiquitin chains (70). Deubiquitination is also a key step in regulating the RIG-I pathway. Deubiquitinating enzymes such as CYLD, USP3, and USP21 impair RIG-I activity via the removal of K63-linked chains (60). Oligomerization of MAVS into prion aggregate-like structures facilitates the recruitment of TRAF2, 5, and 6 and the downstream activation of the kinases TBK1 and IKKε (71, 72). TBK1 and IKKe phosphorylate and activate IRF3 and IRF7 to induce type I IFN and ISG expression. Both RIG-I and Mda5 activities are restricted by basal phosphorylation events (60). Phosphorylation of RIG-I impairs auto activity by repressing its interaction with TRIM25. Additionally, dephosphorylation is a key step in Mda5 activation (70).

Mda5 plays an important role in limiting RNA virus infection, and a large body of genetic evidence has highlighted the importance of Mda5 in the context of disease and anti-viral immunity. Inborn errors in IFIH1, the gene encoding Mda5, have also been attributed to the development of interferonopathies and other autoimmune conditions mediated by IFNs. Indeed, GOF function mutations in Mda5 result in constitutive IFN signaling and the development of AGS (17, 19, 73). Furthermore, the Mda5 A946T allele has been identified as a risk factor in the development of a number of autoimmune diseases including type 1 diabetes, SLE, and multiple sclerosis (74). Loss-of-function mutations in Mda5 have also been identified in children with severe respiratory viral infections (75). In addition to RIG-I and Mda5, dsRNA sensors PKR and OAS also respond to viral infections (7678).

INTERFERON SIGNALING

Type I interferon

Production of type I IFN is an essential early component of the anti-viral immune response and is ubiquitously produced by many cell types. Type I IFNs include IFN-α isoforms along with IFN-β, IFN-ε, IFN-κ, IFN-ω, IFN-δ, IFN-ζ, and IFN-τ. Human IFNβ and α monomers bind to the ubiquitously expressed heterodimer IFNAR1 and IFNAR2 receptors. Ligation of IFNs to their cognate receptors mediates high affinity binding and signal transduction via the kinases TYK2 via IFNAR1 and JAK1 via IFNAR2, resulting in phosphorylation of IFNAR1, which enables the recruitment of STAT2, followed by phosphorylation of STAT2 and recruitment of STAT1 (79). STAT1 is a latent cytoplasmic transcription factor, which becomes activated in response to type I, II, and III IFNs. STAT1 STAT2 heterodimers can then translocate to the nucleus in tandem with the transcription factor IRF9 to form an interferon-stimulated gene factor 3 heterotrimer (ISGF3). ISGF3 binds to interferon-stimulated response elements (ISRE) in the promoters of target genes via the DNA-binding domains of STAT1 and IRF9 (80). IFN signaling can also induce the expression of IRF7, which facilitates a positive feed-forward loop to further enhance IFN- α production (81) (Fig. 2).

Fig 2.

Schematic presents type I, II, and III interferon signaling through JAK1 and TYK2 activation, leading to STAT phosphorylation, ISGF3 or STAT1 dimer formation, and induction of interferon-stimulated genes via ISRE or GAS promoter elements.

Type 1, type II, and type III IFN signaling. Schematic representation of type I-III IFN receptor activation and the resulting signaling cascades. Type I, III, and type II IFNs trigger activation of both JAK1 and the TYK2 adaptor protein, which facilitates STAT phosphorylation. Phosphorylated STAT1 can then form heterodimers with STAT2 to recruit IRF9. STAT1, STAT2, and IRF9 then form the interferon-stimulated gene factor 3 (ISGF3) transcription factor complex. ISGF3 translocates to the nucleus and binds the interferon-stimulated regulatory element (ISRE) sequences for induction of ISG expression.

Type II interferon

Type II IFN, IFNγ, plays critical roles in anti-viral and anti-bacterial immunity. IFNγ is primarily produced by natural killer cells during infection. Like type I IFNs, IFNγ promotes an anti-viral response via the induction of ISGs. Type I IFN, IL-12, IL-15, and IL-18 stimulation of NK results in the expression of IFNγ (82). IL-18 can induce the production of IFNγ via the transcription factors STAT1 or STAT4 (83). IFNγ binds the IFNγ receptors IFNGR1 and IFNGR2 and signals downstream to activate JAK1 and JAK2 (84). IFNγ plays broader anti-viral roles by enhancing antigen presentation to T cells, stimulating nitric oxide production to inhibit viral replication, and promoting vasodilation (85). IFNγ can also promote M1 macrophage polarization for efficient production of IL-12, TNF- α, and IL-1β (86) (Fig. 2).

Type III interferon

Like type I and type II, type III IFNs play important roles in anti-viral immunity. Type III IFNs consist of IFNλ subtypes 1-4 in humans. IFNλ signal through a dimeric receptor consisting of the IFNLR1 and the β-subunit of the IL-10 receptor (87). Expression of IFNλ is limited to epithelial cells, B cells, and neutrophils. Thus, IFNλ plays an important role in restricting viral replication at mucosal surfaces and barrier sites. IFNλ also signals via the JAK-STAT signaling pathway to induce an ISG response. However, type III signaling is regulated differently and provides a more sustained ISG response in epithelia when compared with other cell types (88, 89) (Fig. 2).

NUCLEIC ACID-ASSOCIATED INTERFERONOPATHIES

Aicardi Goutières syndrome (AGS)

AGS is a genetically heterogeneous disease primarily affecting the skin and the brain. AGS is clinically defined as a viral encephalitis-like syndrome, which leads to demyelination, basal ganglia calcifications of the CNS, and developmental delay (90). In all cases, AGS is characterized by excessive production of type I IFN. The AGS-associated ISG molecular signature in patient cells has become a key biomarker of AGS and an important early diagnostic tool (10, 14). To date, mutations in nine different genes have been attributed to AGS including TREX1 (13), SAMHD1 (15), ADAR1 (16), MDA5 (17), RNASEH2 subunits A, B, and C (91), LSM11, and RNU7-1 (20) (Table 1. All mutations result in constitutive IFN production and ISG expression because of aberrant accumulation and detection of immunostimulatory nucleic acids. Mutations in AGS-linked genes lead to the accumulation of host-derived DNA and RNA as a result of a breakdown of regulatory mechanisms, which normally restrict the detection of nucleic acids in the cytosol. Detection of host-derived nucleic acids in the cell leads to the persistent activation of type I IFN and its associated ISG signature via a range of nucleic acid sensors. Given the comparable symptoms with congenital infections exclusion of viral infection is first confirmed in diagnosing AGS, followed by genome sequencing to identify possible AGS-linked mutations (10). Genome sequencing of patients exhibiting the clinical symptoms of AGS has enabled the identification of new AGS mutations in previously uncharacterized cases. In recent years, the mechanistic basis of AGS has been attributed to the constitutive activation of the cGAS STING DNA-sensing pathway or the RLR receptors RIG-I and Mda5.

TABLE 1.

Summary of conditions associated with mutations in the IFN pathway

Condition Gene Mutations Mutation phenotype Pathology Treatment References
Aicardi Goutières syndrome (AGS) TREX1 R114H LOF Developmental delay, encephalopathy, skin rash JAK inhibitors, steroids (13, 92)
SAMHD1 H123Y, R143H/C, R145Q LOF Developmental delay, encephalopathy, skin rash JAK inhibitors, steroids (15, 93)
ADAR1 P193A LOF Developmental delay, encephalopathy, skin rash JAK inhibitors, steroids (16, 94, 95)
IFIH1 R720H, R779H, R337G, R779H, A779C, G495R, N393V, R720G GOF Developmental delay, encephalopathy, skin rash JAK inhibitors, steroids (73, 96, 97)
RNASEH2 A177T LOF Developmental delay, encephalopathy, skin rash JAK inhibitors, steroids (98100)
LSM11 G211S LOF Developmental delay, encephalopathy, skin rash JAK inhibitors, steroids (20, 101)
RNU7-1 LOF Developmental delay, encephalopathy, skin rash JAK inhibitors, steroids (20, 101)
Sting-associated vasculopathy with onset in infancy (SAVI) STING V155M, N154S, V147L, R281Q GOF Interstitial lung disease, skin lesions Cyclophosphamide JAK inhibitors (57, 102107)
COPA syndrome STING P145S,K230N,R233H,W240R,
E241K, E241A, D243N, A239P
LOF Interstitial lung disease JAK inhibitors (48, 56)
Chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis (CMC) STAT1 R274Q GOF Candida infection Anti-fungals (108110)
ISG15 deficiency ISG15 V104M LOF Cerebral calcification, skin lesions, systemic inflammation JAK inhibitors (8, 111113)
USP18 deficiency USP18 I60N LOF Cerebral calcification, skin lesions, systemic inflammation JAK inhibitors (113, 114)
CANDLE/PRAAS PSMB8 G197E LOF Glucocorticoids, JAK inhibitors (106, 115118)
PSMB9 G156D LOF Glucocorticoids, JAK inhibitors (115119)
PSMB10 G201R LOF Glucocorticoids, JAK inhibitors (115119)
Otulin related autoinflammatory syndrome (ORAD) OTULIN G281R, L272P LOF Systemic inflammation Prednisone, colchicine, bone marrow transplant (120, 121)
Severe viral disease TLR3 P554S LOF HSV1 encephalitis, severe respiratory virus infection Acyclovir, Paxlovid, vaccination (35)
TRIF S186L LOF HSV1 encephalitis, severe respiratory virus infection Acyclovir, Paxlovid, vaccination (37)
UNC93B1 P404S LOF HSV1 encephalitis, severe respiratory virus infection Acyclovir, Paxlovid, vaccination (122, 123)
TRAF3 R118W LOF HSV1 encephalitis, severe respiratory virus infection Acyclovir, Paxlovid, vaccination (23, 36)
TBK1 D50A, G159A LOF HSV1 encephalitis, severe respiratory virus infection Acyclovir, Paxlovid, vaccination (122, 124)
IRF3 R285Q LOF HSV1 encephalitis, severe respiratory virus infection Acyclovir, Paxlovid, vaccination (122, 125)
IFNAR 1,675 bp deletion LOF HSV1 encephalitis, severe respiratory virus infection Acyclovir, Paxlovid, vaccination (122, 126)

DNA accumulation and cGAS/STING-mediated AGS

TREX1 is an abundant 3′-5′ exonuclease, which digests cytoplasmic DNA and prevents unwanted activation of nucleic acid sensors (92). TREX1 mutations were first identified in AGS patients presenting with severe encephalitis, intracranial calcifications, and elevated type I IFN in the CSF (13). In addition to AGS, mutations in TREX1 have also been identified in familial chilblain lupus, retinal vasculopathy, and SLE (127). Since its attribution to AGS, many experimental studies demonstrated that Trex1 deficiency results in the abnormal accumulation of DNA species in the cytosol and the constitutive activation of cGAS and STING (13, 92, 128131). Indeed, Trex1-deficient mice have reduced post-natal survival and develop severe myocarditis (128). Trex1-deficient mice exhibit systemic inflammation, production of autoantibodies to dsDNA, and renal disease (129). In contrast to human AGS mutations in TREX1, to date, no neurological phenotypes have been identified in Trex1-deficient mice.

RNase H2 enzymes are ubiquitously expressed and partner with RNase H1 enzymes to degrade cellular RNA:DNA hybrids that arise during nuclear DNA replication and R-loop formation (98). RNase H2 catalyzes ribonucleotide excision repair through the cleavage and removal of single ribonucleotides incorporated into DNA (99). LOF mutations in the RNase H2 genes RNASEH2A, RNASEH2B, and RNASEH2C result in a decrease in stability and reduced levels of cellular ribonucleotide excision repair. RNase H2 mutations account for half of AGS mutations. However, approximately 30% of AGS patients with RNASEH2B mutations do not present with a constitutively active ISG signature. Despite accounting for many AGS cases, there has been a limited number of mechanistic studies investigating how disruption of the RNase H2 complex results in AGS. An experimental knock-in mouse model incorporating a common RNase H2B mutation, A177T (RnaseH2BA177T/A177T) recapitulated the constitutive ISG signature observed in patients (100). Despite recapitulation of the ISG signature, RnaseH2BA177T/A177T did not develop any age-associated defects or neurological symptoms observed in AGS patients. Interestingly, RnaseH2BA177T/A177T crossed to Sting-deficient mice resulted in a significant reduction in the ISG signature when compared with RnaseH2BA177T/A177T mice (100).

SAMHD1 is a dGTP-stimulated triphosphohydrolase that converts deoxynucleoside triphosphates into deoxynucleotides and inorganic triphosphate. Since its discovery, several broad regulatory functions have been attributed to SAMHD1 dNTPase activity including restriction of viral replication, maintenance of genome stability, cell cycle progression, tumor suppression, and immune responses (15, 93, 132, 133). Mutations in SAMHD1 represent a small subset of AGS patients and impair the oligomerization and enzymatic activity of SAMHD1 (15). SAMHD1-linked AGS patients present with early onset encephalitis, intracranial calcifications, and the accumulation of IFN-α in the cerebrospinal fluid (15). SAMHD1 is highly expressed in dendritic cells and has been identified as an HIV-1 restriction factor (132). During infection, SAMHD1 prevents the reverse transcription and the synthesis of retroviral cDNA such as HIV through the hydrolysis of cellular dNTPs. Indeed, HIV replicates more readily in SAMHD1-deficient monocytes and T cells (132).

SAMHD1 is heavily regulated by post-translation modifications including phosphorylation in cycling cells via CDK1 kinase (134). Phosphorylation of SAMHD1 at T592 destabilizes the SAMHD1 tetramer and impairs its triphosphohydrolase activity in cells undergoing mitosis. SAMHD1 is dephosphorylated by PP2A in terminally differentiated cells, thus limiting its activity to non-cycling cells (135). In addition to phosphorylation, SAMHD1 is also regulated by acetylation and cysteine oxidation (133, 136). During mitosis, ARD1-mediated acetylation of K405 in SAMHD1 enhances dNTPase activity, leading to a reduction in the cellular levels of dNTPs (133). Cysteine oxidation of SAMHD1 constitutes a redox switch during proliferation, which impairs tetramerization, catalytic activity, and nuclear localization (136). SAMHD1-deficient mice display a constitutive ISG signature but do not develop any clinical symptoms of AGS (137). Although the precise nature of SAMHD1-mediated suppression of type I remains unclear, it has been proposed that SAMHD1 deficiency may permit the accumulation of retroviral nucleic acids that trigger nucleic acid sensors and the induction of IFN and ISG expressions. The constitutive expression and tight regulation of SAMHD1 by PTMs represent opportunities for direct therapeutic targeting to regulate SAMDH1 activity. Furthermore, the manipulation of SAMHD1 acetylation and cysteine oxidation may also be an alternative strategy for limiting retroviral replication.

The most recent forms of AGS have been attributed to LOF mutations in LSM11 and RNU7-1. Using exome sequencing, mutations in LSM11 and RNU7-1 were identified in AGS patients without a genetic diagnosis (20). LSM11 and RNU7-1 are components of the U7 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP) complex, which processes replication-dependent pre-mRNAs. In the absence of appropriate histone pre-mRNA processing accumulation of aberrant mRNA isoforms with poly(A) tails occurs. Analysis of patients with biallelic mutations in LSM11 revealed an enrichment of misprocessed aberrantly polyadenylated transcripts and impairment of chromatin-bound histone stoichiometry. Thus, disrupting the nuclear distribution of cGAS. As discussed, nuclear-localized cGAS is tethered tightly to nucleosomes and prevented from detecting self-DNA. Patients’ fibroblasts displayed a constitutive ISG signature because of the constitutive production of cGAMP from soluble nuclear cGAS.

RNA sensor-mediated AGS

Adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADARs) are adenosine deaminases that convert adenosine to inosine in dsRNA via a process known as hydrolytic deamination (138). ADAR1 also plays a role in metabolizing basally transcribed retroelements to prevent the accumulation of dsRNA in the cell (139). ADAR1 has two isoforms, p150 and p110. p150 is located in the cytoplasm and is IFN inducible, whereas p110 is constitutively expressed in the nucleus (78). LOF ADAR1 mutations result in the development of AGS because of aberrant activation of the RNA sensor Mda5 and a constitutive IFN response. Conversion of adenosine to inosine by ADAR1 impairs the ability of Mda5 to bind dsRNA, thus preventing immune recognition of cellular RNA products (94). Mutations in the dsRNA binding regions of the catalytic domain of ADAR1 create protein instability and loss of deamination activity (16). Like other forms of AGS, patients with ADAR1-driven AGS display severe neurological symptoms including intracranial calcification, white matter disease, and severe developmental delay (16). Autosomal-dominant and autosomal-recessive mutations in ADAR1 have also been identified in AGS patients suffering from bilateral striatal necrosis (BSN) and spastic paraplegia with all patients displaying an active ISG signature (95). Both patients with ADAR1 AGS mutations or ADAR1-deficient mice experience a severe type I interferonopathy because of cytoplasmic accumulation of dsRNA and activation of RNA sensors (16, 77). Development of mouse models of ADAR1 deficiency has provided overwhelming evidence for the important role ADAR1 plays in negatively regulating Mda5 activation (77, 78, 140, 141). Furthermore, the embryonic lethality of ADAR1-deficient mice is rescued by concurrent deletion with Mda5 or MAVS (78, 94). More recently, the precise signaling events downstream of Mda5 activation in ADAR1 deficiency have been delineated using a mouse model of AGS. Mice expressing a single copy of the ADAR1 AGS allele P195A coupled to a p150 null allele (AdarP195A/p150-) displayed severe disease, which was dependent on Mda5, LGP2, type I IFNs, and PKR. Furthermore, pharmacological inhibition of the PKR-mediated integrated stress response (ISR) alleviated disease (77).

In addition to driving ADAR1-associated AGS, GOF mutations in the helicase domain of Mda5, encoded by IFIH1, have also been identified as an underlying cause of AGS (17, 73). As discussed, Mda5 is an important anti-viral sensor of dsRNA, which signals via the adaptor protein MAVS. GOF mutation in IFIH1 results in enhanced RNA binding and an increase in the basal- and ligand-induced IFN responses. IFIH1-related AGS results in a constitutively active IFN response and ISG signature in patients. In addition to AGS IFIH1, SNP risk alleles have also been identified in a range of autoinflammatory and autoimmune conditions such as type 1 diabetes, vitiligo, psoriasis, arthritis, multiple sclerosis, and SLE (74, 96, 142145).

STING-associated vasculopathy with onset in infancy (SAVI)

GOF mutations in the gene encoding STING have been attributed to a rare interferonopathy known as STING-associated vasculopathy with onset in infancy (SAVI) (18, 146). Patients suffering from SAVI exhibit an elevated ISG expression signature in peripheral cells as well as respiratory failure, skin rash, and pulmonary fibrosis (147). An asparagine to serine mutation (N154S) has been identified as one of the most common mutations found in SAVI patients (148). However additional autosomal-dominant and autosomal-recessive mutations have been identified in the connector helix loop (N154S, V155M, and V147L) and the polymerization interface (G207E, R281Q, and R284G/R284S) (18, 102, 149). Considering these findings, studies using mouse models expressing SAVI mutations recapitulated human disease (103, 104, 150). Interestingly, heterozygous mice harboring one copy of the N153s allele display similar clinical symptoms to SAVI patients (103, 104). N153s mice also display defects in adaptive immune cell development, myeloid cell expansion, and a reduction of T cells in the thymus, blood, and spleen (104). Surprisingly, Irf3 or Ifnar deficiency did not alleviate disease in N153S mice, suggesting that SAVI occurs independently of type I IFN (103, 104, 150). In contrast, the loss of TCRbeta T cells protects mice from disease (105, 150). In addition, N153S mice also develop chronic colitis in a microbiome-dependent manner (105). To date, there have been no published reports of colitis in SAVI patients. The severe interstitial lung disease, which presents in SAVI, is not collectively seen in all type I interferonopathies, indicating that the shared ISG signature can function as a diagnostic or danger signal for other interferon-independent mechanisms contributing to disease.

COPA syndrome

COPA is a subunit of the coatomer protein complex (COPI), which facilitates the retrograde transport of cargo proteins between the ER and Golgi and the localization of vesicles within the Golgi (151). A range of clinical symptoms in COPA syndrome have been reported, including a constitutive ISG signature, interstitial lung disease, renal disease, arthritis, and arthralgia. Myositis, macrophage activation syndrome, and autoantibodies have also been reported in patients with COPA syndrome (56). Interestingly, clinical penetrance can vary in COPA syndrome, including patients with an elevated ISG expression signature. Thus, additional environmental or genetic factors may influence the development of clinical disease (56). Given the clinical similarities with SAVI, it was hypothesized that COPA syndrome may be STING-dependent. Further analysis identified aberrant trafficking of STING from the ER to the Golgi as the underlying cause of COPA syndrome (48, 49, 56). Mutant COPA results in the accumulation of STING in the Golgi and constitutive activation of IFN signaling (49).

Stat1 gain-of-function mutations

STAT1 is a latent transcription factor activated downstream of type I, II, III IFNs, and IL-127 (79). STAT1 GOF mutations render patients highly susceptible to fungal infections because of decreased IL-17-producing T cells. Type I and I IFNs, which signal via STAT1, inhibit Th17 cells; thus, enhancement of IFN-induced STAT1 signaling has been attributed to impaired IL-17 production and susceptibility to Candida infection. Chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis (CMC) and hypothyroidism are common clinical manifestations of STAT1 GOF mutations (152). Other autoimmune symptoms include enterocolitis, immune cytopenia, endocrinopathies, and SLE (108). In comparison to other interferonopathies, STAT1 gain-of-function mutations result in high-level disease penetrance, with more than 65 recurrent GOF mutations in STAT1 identified in 400 patients globally (109). Mechanistically, STAT1 GOF mutations impair STAT1 dephosphorylation and create a locked conformation, which prevents nuclear to cytoplasmic shuttling (109). In addition, phosphorylated tyrosine 701 becomes inaccessible to phosphatases. Given the requirement of STAT1 in driving an ISG expression signature, the differential phenotypes of cGAS/STING-driven inflammatory conditions versus STAT1-driven disease may be attributed to IFN-independent pathways.

UBIQUITIN ACCUMULATION IN INTERFERONOPATHIES

Cytosolic accumulation of ubiquitin chains has been attributed to a range of conditions associated with excessive type I IFN and an ISG molecular signature as a result of proteotoxic stress (115, 116). Dysregulated or damaged mitochondria have been associated with ubiquitin labeling and mtDNA release to the cytosol in neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s; however, a growing number of interferonopathies also display evidence of ubiquitin accumulation and may represent an under-utilized danger signal to supplement genome sequencing-based diagnostics and ISG signatures. Inborn errors in the proteasome system and negative regulators of the TNFR1 and IFNAR pathways share underlying defects in eliminating ubiquitin chains and ubiquitin-like molecules (120). Ubiquitin chains serve as an anchor and scaffold between signaling complexes to sustain pathway activation and can contribute to the sustained activation of the type I IFN signaling pathway (71). In addition, the accumulation of ubiquitin on damaged proteins and organelles creates cellular stress and toxicity to trigger activation of innate immune signaling pathways and type I IFN production (115117, 153) (Fig. 3). With respect to Mendelian inborn errors, numerous syndromes display constitutive ISG signatures because of the presence or absence of ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like molecules.

Fig 3.

Schematic presents PSMB mutant-driven proteotoxic stress, OTULIN pathway regulating LUBAC and TNFR signaling, and USP18 or ISG15-deficient IFNAR2 signaling to amplify STAT1-STAT2-IRF9-mediated ISG expression through sustained JAK1-TYK2 activation.

Ubiquitin accumulation promotes interferonopathies. Schematic representation of inborn error mutations that perturb ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like signaling molecules. (A) PSMB mutations disrupt the normal function of the proteasome. In the absence of a functioning proteasome, ubiquitinated proteins accumulate in the cell and promote proteotoxic stress and release of danger signals, which can trigger the activation of nucleic acid sensors and induction of an IFN response. (B) OTULIN counters LUBAC auto-ubiquitination, reduces LUBAC levels, and impairs the recruitment of LUBAC into complex I downstream of TNFR1. Impaired TNF-induced NFkB activation in OTULIN-deficient mice led to an increase in necroptosis, apoptosis, and embryonic lethality. Furthermore, in the absence of OTULIN, Caspase 8, and RIPK3, RIPK1 induced a robust type I IFN and ISG signature. (C) IFNAR activation stimulates the expression of USP18 and ISG15 as a negative feedback loop to limit IFNAR signaling. USP18/ISG15 deficiency promotes constitutive sustained activation of the IFNAR signaling pathway via enhanced interaction of JAK1 with STAT1 and promotes constitutive ISG expression.

ISG15/USP18 deficiency

Interferon-stimulated gene 15 (ISG15) is a member of the ubiquitin family of proteins and plays important functions in limiting viral replication and also regulates the IFNAR signaling pathway (154). Expression of ISG15 and the ISG15 conjugation machinery is induced by type I IFNs. Conjugation of ISG15 to host and viral proteins plays important roles in limiting viral replication and IFNAR signaling (5). Pro-ISG15 is expressed as a 17 kDa precursor and proteolytically cleaved into an active 15 kDa ubiquitin-like protein. ISG15 is covalently ligated to a target protein by a process known as ISGylation. ISG15 is a broad anti-viral effector protein. Indeed, Isg15-deficient mice are viable but are highly susceptible to a number of viral infections (155). Additionally, viruses can subvert ISGylation through the expression of ISG15 deconjugases to promote viral replication. Monogenic mutations in ISG15 have been identified in patients with symptoms including mycobacterial disease, dermatological disease, and an interferonopathy akin to AGS (8, 111, 112). The predominant AGS-like phenotype and interferonopathy have been attributed to constitutive IFNAR signaling. Following activation of the IFNAR pathway, IRF9 induces the expression of the ubiquitin-specific peptidase USP18 to bind IFNAR2 and sterically impair JAK1 binding. ISGylation of USP18 allows USP18 to stabilize and accumulate, thus impairing JAK1 signaling (156). In the absence of ISG15, USP18 is destabilized, resulting in constitutive activation of the IFNAR pathway. Despite the reported roles of ISG15 in suppressing viral replication no ISG15-deficient patients have presented with chronic viral infections.

Like ISG15 deficiency, USP18 deficiency leads to the development of a severe type I interferonopathy. USP18 deficiency results in the rapid onset of hydrocephalus, necrotizing cellulitis, systemic inflammation, and respiratory failure in the perinatal period (114). Homozygous mutation in USP18 results in the expression of a catalytically inactive form of USP18 (156). In the absence of USP18, sustained JAK-STAT signaling occurs and promotes the constitutive expression of an ISG signature. Remarkably, USP18-mediated inhibition of JAK1 occurs in a protease-independent manner (113, 156). Interestingly, type III IFN signaling is not regulated by USP18, and IFNλ signaling is sustained kinetically in comparison to IFNAR1/2 signaling.

CANDLE/PRAAS

Proteasomes are complex structures that play critical roles in maintaining cellular homeostasis via the degradation of non-lysosomal, K48-ubiquinated proteins. IFNγ induced expression of β-subunits results in the formation of the immunoproteasome. β-subunits of the immunoproteasome consist of PSMB9, PSMB10, and PSMB8 (157). The immunoproteasome plays an essential role in coping with the metabolic demands of an immune response. Loss of proteasome function results in the accumulation of polyubiquitinated proteins, cellular stress, and constitutive expression of type I IFNs (158). Recently, mutations in the immunoproteasomes have been identified as the underlying cause of a severe inflammatory disorder termed chronic atypical neutrophilic dermatosis with lipodystrophy and elevated temperature (CANDLE), a class of proteasome-associated autoinflammatory syndrome (PRAAS) (115, 118, 119). CANDLE, although triggered by numerous mutations, is characterized by the sustained production of type I IFN, which is a key feature of each phenotype. Periodic flares of CANDLE have been attributed to events such as cold stress and viral infections. Interestingly, skin lesions are a common feature of CANDLE and range from acral periotic lesions, to annular plaques, and periocular edema. Neurological defects are not common in CANDLE patients; however, encephalitis and basal ganglia calcifications have been identified in some groups of patients (115, 117). Lipodystrophic fat loss is also a key manifestation of CANDLE (116, 159).

A missense mutation in PSMB8, G197E, results in the reduced expression of PSMB8, elevated IL-6 production, and lipodystrophy through disturbed adipocyte differentiation, high-level neutrophilia in the dermis, and accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins in PSMB8 mutated cells (157, 158). In another study, patient mutations in the proteasome genes PSMA3, PSMB4, PSMB9, and POMP resulted in proteasome dysfunction and constitutive induction of type I IFN and an associated ISG signature. CANDLE-associated mutations specifically exhibit constitutive upregulation of IFN-α and IFN-β but not IFNλ. Additionally, cellular analysis of patient PMBCs identified NK cells and pDCs as the major source of type I IFN in CANDLE (118). Anti-TNF-directed therapies have proved ineffective at treating CANDLE (115). More recently, CANDLE patients treated with JAK inhibitors showed significant clinical improvement (106, 119). Psmb8 knockout mice fail to recapitulate CANDLE phenotypes; thus, the precise molecular mechanisms that underpin CANDLE remain underexplored (160). Indeed, it is unclear which precise nucleic acid sensors dysfunctional proteasomes trigger to induce the IFN production and ISG expression observed in CANDLE patients. It has been proposed that the accumulation of defective ribosomal products and polyubiquitinated proteins may trigger a proteotoxic response through a nucleic acid sensor that leads to type IFN production (11). However, proteasome inhibition in vitro retains constitutive ISG activation in STING-deficient cells, suggesting that CANDLE occurs independently of cGAS and STING (118). Furthermore, cGAMP has not been detected in CANDLE patients.

OTULIN-related autoinflammatory syndrome (ORAS)

OTULIN is a deubiquitinating enzyme that specifically hydrolyzes linear polyubiquitin chains (161). Hydrolysis of linear ubiquitin chains by OTULIN is essential for regulating downstream signaling of TNFR1 and IFNAR (158, 162). More recently, a reanalysis of linear ubiquitin signaling revealed that OTULIN counters LUBAC auto-ubiquitination, reduces LUBAC levels, and impairs the recruitment of LUBAC into complex I downstream of TNFR1 (163). Impaired TNF-induced NFκB activation in OTULIN-deficient mice led to an increase in necroptosis, apoptosis, and embryonic lethality. Furthermore, in the absence of OTULIN, Caspase 8, and RIPK3, RIPK1 induced a robust type I IFN and ISG signature (163). The severe inflammatory phenotypes identified in mouse models of OTULIN deficiency have also been recapitulated in human genetic inborn errors. To date, three missense or frameshift LOF mutations have been identified in ORAS. Mechanistically, ORAS mutations result in the loss of OTULIN deubiquitinating activity and reduced stability. In the absence of OTULIN, linear ubiquitin chains accumulate, which results in increased proinflammatory cytokine and neutrophilic dermatitis, panniculitis, and developmental delay. Liver disease is also recurrent in ORAS patients (164). ORAS patients also display fat loss and skin lesions, which are common features of CANDLE (165). Elevated levels of IL-18 and IFNγ have been routinely detected in patient serum. In addition, elevated expression of the ISGs IRF7, IFIT2, and Mx1 were also detected in whole blood and fibroblasts from patients with ORAS mutations. In another study, a homozygous missense, hypomorphic mutation in OTULIN was identified as the cause of an autoinflammatory condition. The resulting L272P mutation impaired ubiquitin binding and loss of stability. However, ISG expression was not assessed (121). Despite the recurrent detection of IFNγ and ISGs in ORAS patients, it remains unclear what role interferons play in the pathogenesis of ORAS.

TYPE I IFN DEFICIENCY AND SUSCEPTIBILITY TO VIRAL INFECTION

Many viral infections range from asymptomatic to mild disease with self-limiting symptoms. However, severe viral infections can lead to hospitalization and death. Of note, respiratory infections account for 21% of all childhood mortality (166, 167). Type I and type III IFNs play critical roles in anti-viral immunity, and control of viral infection, and impaired IFN responses are commonly associated with susceptibility to viral infection. In recent years, human immunodeficiencies affecting IFN production and IFN responses have been identified in children with severe viral infections (168). Based on numerous studies, a hierarchy of clinical manifestations has emerged with respect to the pathway location of each LOF mutation. In addition, through genetic analysis of these patients, the essential roles and redundancy of receptors, adaptors, and transcription factors have been identified for immunity to specific human viruses.

Herpes simplex encephalitis in IFN deficiencies

Children with germline mutations in components of the TLR-3 pathway are highly susceptible to herpes simplex encephalitis (HSE) due to impaired IFN responses (30, 3537, 168, 169). HSV1 is a double-stranded DNA virus recognized by TLR-3 (170). TLR-3 plays a redundant role in responding to most microbes but is indispensable for natural immunity against HSV1 in the brain (Fig. 4). TLR-3 is expressed in the CNS in addition to dendritic and epithelial cells. HSV1 infects epithelial cells in the oral and nasal mucosa and permeates to the CNS via the trigeminal ganglia and olfactory nerves (171). HSE is a rare complication of HSV1 infection and presents in children with single-gene inborn errors of the TLR-3 pathway, including TLR-3, TRIF, UNC93B1, TRAF3, TBK1, and IRF3 (30, 3537, 124, 168).

Fig 4.

Schematic presents HSV1-induced TLR3 endosomal signaling via TRIF activating TRAF3-TBK1-IKKi complex leading to IRF3 phosphorylation and type I IFN expression, initiating IFNAR-STAT1-STAT2-IRF9 mediated ISRE-dependent ISG transcription.

TLR3 signaling is essential for HSV1 immunity. Schematic representation of the TLR3 signaling pathway required for HSV1 immunity. Detection of viral RNA by TLR3 results in the recruitment of TRIF, TRAF3 ubiquitination, and recruitment of TBK1 and IKK. TBK1 and IKKε phosphorylate IRF3, which translocates and induces expression of IFN-β. IFN-β then induces the expression of anti-viral ISGs required for anti-HSV1 immunity. Loss-of-function mutations in TLR3, TRIF, TRAF3, TBK1, and IRF3 all lead to HSV1 susceptibility.

Dominant negative mutations in TLR-3 have been identified in children with severe forms of HSE (35). Typically, patients present with bilateral hemorrhagic lesions and a positive HSV1 PCR test. TLR-3-deficient patient fibroblasts and MDDCs also display impaired TLR3 responses to Poly (I:C). HSE has also been attributed to autosomal-recessive (AR) and autosomal-dominant (AD) TRIF deficiency (37). AR and AD mutations in TRIF resulted in loss of protein expression or the expression of a non-functioning protein, respectively. Interestingly, in cases of TRIF deficiency, relatives with TRIF deficiency positive for HSV1 infection did not present with HSE, indicating incomplete disease penetrance (37). UNC93B1 is an essential mediator of endosomal TLR signaling. AR UNC93B1 deficiency can also manifest as HSE as a result of impaired endosomal TLR responses (30).

In addition to TLR-3 and TRIF, AD mutations in TRAF3 have also been identified in children with HSE. TRAF3 mutant alleles were associated with loss of function-dominant negative forms of TRAF3 with impaired but not abolished TRAF3-dependent TLR-3 responses (36). Given that TRAF3-deficient mice die in the neonatal period, there lack definitive experimental data on the physiological functions of TRAF3 with respect to viral infection. TLR-3-independent pathways can compensate for the loss of TLR3 to restrict HSV1 replication. Indeed, activation of cGAS STING in microglia is essential for HSV1 immunity and production of IFN. Indeed, it has been proposed that IFN produced downstream of cGAS/STING promotes the upregulation of TLR-3 to potentiate anti-HSV1 immunity (171). However, there may exist non-redundant functions for TLR-3 in other cell types and tissues infected with HSV1. Based on these studies, converging PRR pathways require IFN and IFNAR signaling, given the severity associated with inborn errors in the TLR-3 pathway. Despite strong evidence supporting a role for cGAS and STING in anti-HSV1 immunity in experimental murine models, the current genetic evidence supports an indispensable role for TLR-3 signaling in controlling HSV1 infection in the CNS (7, 171, 172). Additionally, to date, the LOF STING haplotype, HAQ, which impairs STING responses, has not been attributed to susceptibility to HSV1 infection (173).

As discussed previously, TBK1 is an essential mediator of IRF3-induced type I IFN and inflammatory cytokine production. LOF mutations in TBK1 have further identified a requirement for TLR-3 signaling and TBK1-mediated IFN production in controlling HSV1 infection in the CNS. Indeed, loss-of-function mutations in TBK1 have been identified in patients with heterozygous mutations D50A and G159A, resulting in protein instability and loss of kinase function, respectively (124). In these cases, elevated viral replication and cell death responses to HSV1 and VSV were observed in patient fibroblasts due to loss of IFN. More recently, TBK1 function has extended beyond IFN production and is identified as an important mediator of autophagy and suppression of RIPK1-dependent TNFR1-induced cell death (174177).

RNA virus immune deficiencies

Considering the SARS-CoV2 pandemic, many genetic studies have identified the type I IFN response as an essential mediator of SARS-Cov2 immunity and prevention of severe disease (122). Indeed, patients with neutralizing autoantibodies targeting IFN-alpha2 IFN were present in 10% of severe COVID-19 cases. In addition, several patients with severe forms of SARS-CoV2 infections harbored autosomal-recessive deficiencies in IRF7 and IFNAR or autosomal-dominant deficiencies in TLR-3, UNC93B1, TRIF, TBK1, IRF3, IRF7, IFNAR1, and IFNAR2 (122). Inborn errors in the TLR-3 pathway and IRF7-dependent type I response were causative factors in a percentage of severe COVID-19 cases. In addition to SARS-CoV2 mutations in the transcription factor, IRF7 has been identified as a risk allele for severe H1N1 influenza infection. IRF7 is an ISG induced to amplify type I and type III IFN and plays an important role in pDCs. The RNA-sensor Mda5 (IFIH1) is an essential mediator of type I IFN production following infection with Rhinovirus or respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). In one study, 120 otherwise healthy children with severe respiratory viral infections were sequenced. Loss-of-function variants in IFIH1 encoding Mda5 were identified as the cause of elevated viral replication. Mda5 mutations impaired IFNB as a result of reduced stability and loss of ATPase activity (75). In addition, another study identified homozygous missense mutations in Mda5 that failed to recognize Poly IC. Increased viral replication was observed in the nasal epithelial cells. Thus, Mda5 deficiencies result in impaired sensing and IFN responses leading to enhanced susceptibility to common infections such as IAV, RSV, and rhinovirus (178).

FUTURE OUTLOOK

The pathogenic role of IFNs in disease has been a well-established feature of many inflammatory diseases. More recently, elucidation of the key signaling pathways that precede IFN production coupled with the availability of exome sequencing for diagnostic use has revealed, at a molecular level, the causal factors that perturb innate immune signaling pathways and initiate the development of interferonopathies. Despite the broad detection of ISG signatures as an indicator of interferonopathy, the preceding pathways that are triggered are more complex and contribute to disease independently of IFN. Indeed, ISG signatures in inborn errors outside the IFNAR pathway represent a secondary response to the primary perturbed pathway. In addition, type I, II, and III interferon will activate comparable ISG signatures despite originating from diverse cell types and signaling pathways. Upregulation of USP18 represents a definitive marker of type I IFN dysregulation is not upregulated by type III IFN. Thus, its inclusion in diagnostic ISG panels may indicate more specificity in patient tissue analysis. Although the ISG signature offers a very valuable diagnostic tool, a wider analysis of the pathway-specific factors would offer significant value for early diagnosis. For example, the differentiation between diseases triggered by RNA sensors versus DNA sensors often requires a significant amount of molecular elucidation prior to defining the mechanistic basis of a novel interferonopathy. More routine quantification of cGAMP levels and improved cGAMP detection methods would assist with defining diseases that promote constitutive activation of cGAS and STING.

Current treatment options for interferonopathies rely on direct targeting of the IFNAR receptor or JAK inhibition. Thus, any IFN-independent pathologies associated with the disease are not impacted. Unsurprisingly, therapies targeting type I IFN have failed to gain significant traction as a frontline therapy for interferonopathies. Furthermore, evidence is now emerging that certain interferonopathies are driven independently of IFN. Indeed, in experimental models of SAVI, lung and intestinal pathologies occur independently of type I IFN. This indicates that other pathways downstream of STING mediate interstitial lung disease associated with SAVI. Furthermore, STING-driven diseases such as SAVI and COPA syndrome uniquely display severe interstitial lung disease, typically, not seen in other conditions such as AGS. The differential manifestation of diseases that share excessive IFN is especially relevant to the success of how these diseases are treated in the future. As our knowledge of the underlying mechanisms of these diseases grows, there is now a huge focus on developing the next generation of therapies to directly target key proteins that mediate interferonopathies such as nucleic acid sensors like cGAS, STING, and Mda5.

Despite the essential roles of STING in mediating protective immunity against DNA viruses in experimental models, very little evidence exists for anti-viral STING functions in human systems. Therefore, direct targeting of STING may not render patients vulnerable to viral infections as seen with anti-IFNAR therapies. As discussed, TLR3 signaling is an essential component of immunity to HSV1 infection and protection of HSE. The HAQ STING allele is a LOF function variant that impairs the induction of type I IFN. Despite being the second most common allele, the HAQ variant does not affect HSE susceptibility. It is unclear if the HAQ allele impacts disease penetrance in cGAS/STING-driven interferonopathies. To date, no LOF cGAS mutations have been identified. Viral tropism and infectivity of specific cell types where cGAS and STING may not be expressed might also contribute to cGAMP redundancy in anti-viral immunity. Furthermore, DNA viruses do not typically spread as efficiently as RNA respiratory viruses. Thus, in a viral context, the physiological relevance of cGAMP may be limited to host-derived DNA.

Contributor Information

Fiachra Humphries, Email: fiachra.humphries@umassmed.edu.

Jacob Yount, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Trinchieri G. 2010. Type I interferon: friend or foe? J Exp Med 207:2053–2063. doi: 10.1084/jem.20101664 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Fitzgerald KA, Kagan JC. 2020. Toll-like receptors and the control of immunity. Cell 180:1044–1066. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Chen Q, Sun L, Chen ZJ. 2016. Regulation and function of the cGAS–STING pathway of cytosolic DNA sensing. Nat Immunol 17:1142–1149. doi: 10.1038/ni.3558 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Schreiber G. 2017. The molecular basis for differential type I interferon signaling. J Biol Chem 292:7285–7294. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R116.774562 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Schoggins JW. 2019. Interferon-stimulated genes: what do they all do? Annu Rev Virol 6:567–584. doi: 10.1146/annurev-virology-092818-015756 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Marshak-Rothstein A. 2006. Toll-like receptors in systemic autoimmune disease. Nat Rev Immunol 6:823–835. doi: 10.1038/nri1957 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Humphries F, Shmuel-Galia L, Jiang Z, Wilson R, Landis P, Ng S-L, Parsi K-M, Maehr R, Cruz J, Morales-Ramos A, Ramanjulu JM, Bertin J, Pesiridis GS, Fitzgerald KA. 2021. A diamidobenzimidazole STING agonist protects against SARS-CoV-2 infection. Sci Immunol 6:eabi9002. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abi9002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Zhang X, Bogunovic D, Payelle-Brogard B, Francois-Newton V, Speer SD, Yuan C, Volpi S, Li Z, Sanal O, Mansouri D, et al. 2015. Human intracellular ISG15 prevents interferon-α/β over-amplification and auto-inflammation. Nature 517:89–93. doi: 10.1038/nature13801 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Crow MK, Olferiev M, Kirou KA. 2015. Targeting of type I interferon in systemic autoimmune diseases. Transl Res 165:296–305. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2014.10.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Crow YJ, Manel N. 2015. Aicardi-Goutières syndrome and the type I interferonopathies. Nat Rev Immunol 15:429–440. doi: 10.1038/nri3850 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Sanchez GAM, de Jesus AA, Goldbach-Mansky R. 2013. Monogenic autoinflammatory diseases: disorders of amplified danger sensing and cytokine dysregulation. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 39:701–734. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2013.08.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Motwani M, Pesiridis S, Fitzgerald KA. 2019. DNA sensing by the cGAS-STING pathway in health and disease. Nat Rev Genet 20:657–674. doi: 10.1038/s41576-019-0151-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Crow YJ, Hayward BE, Parmar R, Robins P, Leitch A, Ali M, Black DN, van Bokhoven H, Brunner HG, Hamel BC, et al. 2006. Mutations in the gene encoding the 3′-5′ DNA exonuclease TREX1 cause Aicardi-Goutières syndrome at the AGS1 locus. Nat Genet 38:917–920. doi: 10.1038/ng1845 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Uggetti C, La Piana R, Orcesi S, Egitto MG, Crow YJ, Fazzi E. 2009. Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome: neuroradiologic findings and follow-up. Am J Neuroradiol 30:1971–1976. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1694 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Rice GI, Bond J, Asipu A, Brunette RL, Manfield IW, Carr IM, Fuller JC, Jackson RM, Lamb T, Briggs TA, et al. 2009. Mutations involved in Aicardi-Goutières syndrome implicate SAMHD1 as regulator of the innate immune response. Nat Genet 41:829–832. doi: 10.1038/ng.373 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Rice GI, Kasher PR, Forte GMA, Mannion NM, Greenwood SM, Szynkiewicz M, Dickerson JE, Bhaskar SS, Zampini M, Briggs TA, et al. 2012. Mutations in ADAR1 cause Aicardi-Goutières syndrome associated with a type I interferon signature. Nat Genet 44:1243–1248. doi: 10.1038/ng.2414 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Rice GI, Del Toro Duany Y, Jenkinson EM, Forte GM, Anderson BH, Ariaudo G, Bader-Meunier B, Baildam EM, Battini R, Beresford MW, et al. 2014. Gain-of-function mutations in IFIH1 cause a spectrum of human disease phenotypes associated with upregulated type I interferon signaling. Nat Genet 46:503–509. doi: 10.1038/ng.2933 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Jeremiah N, Neven B, Gentili M, Callebaut I, Maschalidi S, Stolzenberg M-C, Goudin N, Frémond M-L, Nitschke P, Molina TJ, Blanche S, Picard C, Rice GI, Crow YJ, Manel N, Fischer A, Bader-Meunier B, Rieux-Laucat F. 2014. Inherited STING-activating mutation underlies a familial inflammatory syndrome with lupus-like manifestations. J Clin Invest 124:5516–5520. doi: 10.1172/JCI79100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Buers I, Rice GI, Crow YJ, Rutsch F. 2017. MDA5-associated neuroinflammation and the Singleton–Merten syndrome: two faces of the same type I interferonopathy spectrum. J Interferon Cytokine Res 37:214–219. doi: 10.1089/jir.2017.0004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Uggenti C, Lepelley A, Depp M, Badrock AP, Rodero MP, El-Daher M-T, Rice GI, Dhir S, Wheeler AP, Dhir A, et al. 2020. cGAS-mediated induction of type I interferon due to inborn errors of histone pre-mRNA processing. Nat Genet 52:1364–1372. doi: 10.1038/s41588-020-00737-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. O’Neill LAJ, Bowie AG. 2007. The family of five: TIR-domain-containing adaptors in Toll-like receptor signalling. Nat Rev Immunol 7:353–364. doi: 10.1038/nri2079 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Kagan JC, Su T, Horng T, Chow A, Akira S, Medzhitov R. 2008. TRAM couples endocytosis of Toll-like receptor 4 to the induction of interferon-beta. Nat Immunol 9:361–368. doi: 10.1038/ni1569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Tseng P-H, Matsuzawa A, Zhang W, Mino T, Vignali DAA, Karin M. 2010. Different modes of ubiquitination of the adaptor TRAF3 selectively activate the expression of type I interferons and proinflammatory cytokines. Nat Immunol 11:70–75. doi: 10.1038/ni.1819 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Fitzgerald KA, Rowe DC, Barnes BJ, Caffrey DR, Visintin A, Latz E, Monks B, Pitha PM, Golenbock DT. 2003. LPS-TLR4 signaling to IRF-3/7 and NF-κB involves the toll adapters TRAM and TRIF. J Exp Med 198:1043–1055. doi: 10.1084/jem.20031023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Thanos D, Maniatis T. 1995. Virus induction of human IFNβ gene expression requires the assembly of an enhanceosome. Cell 83:1091–1100. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90136-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Majer Olivia, Liu B, Woo BJ, Kreuk LSM, Van Dis E, Barton GM. 2019. Release from UNC93B1 reinforces the compartmentalized activation of select TLRs. Nature 575:371–374. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1611-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Majer O., Liu B, Kreuk LSM, Krogan N, Barton GM. 2019. UNC93B1 recruits syntenin-1 to dampen TLR7 signalling and prevent autoimmunity. Nature 575:366–370. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1612-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Greulich W, Wagner M, Gaidt MM, Stafford C, Cheng Y, Linder A, Carell T, Hornung V. 2019. TLR8 is a sensor of RNase T2 degradation products. Cell 179:1264–1275. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.11.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Smith N, Rodero MP, Bekaddour N, Bondet V, Ruiz-Blanco YB, Harms M, Mayer B, Bader-Meunier B, Quartier P, Bodemer C, Baudouin V, Dieudonné Y, Kirchhoff F, Sanchez Garcia E, Charbit B, Leboulanger N, Jahrsdörfer B, Richard Y, Korganow A-S, Münch J, Nisole S, Duffy D, Herbeuval J-P. 2019. Control of TLR7-mediated type I IFN signaling in pDCs through CXCR4 engagement-A new target for lupus treatment. Sci Adv 5:eaav9019. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aav9019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Casrouge A, Zhang S-Y, Eidenschenk C, Jouanguy E, Puel A, Yang K, Alcais A, Picard C, Mahfoufi N, Nicolas N, et al. 2006. Herpes simplex virus encephalitis in human UNC-93B deficiency. Science 314:308–312. doi: 10.1126/science.1128346 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Honda K, Ohba Y, Yanai H, Negishi H, Mizutani T, Takaoka A, Taya C, Taniguchi T. 2005. Spatiotemporal regulation of MyD88-IRF-7 signalling for robust type-I interferon induction. Nature 434:1035–1040. doi: 10.1038/nature03547 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Honda K, Yanai H, Mizutani T, Negishi H, Shimada N, Suzuki N, Ohba Y, Takaoka A, Yeh W-C, Taniguchi T. 2004. Role of a transductional-transcriptional processor complex involving MyD88 and IRF-7 in Toll-like receptor signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:15416–15421. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0406933101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Moynagh PN. 2014. The roles of Pellino E3 ubiquitin ligases in immunity. Nat Rev Immunol 14:122–131. doi: 10.1038/nri3599 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Fitzgerald KA, McWhirter SM, Faia KL, Rowe DC, Latz E, Golenbock DT, Coyle AJ, Liao S-M, Maniatis T. 2003. IKKε and TBK1 are essential components of the IRF3 signaling pathway. Nat Immunol 4:491–496. doi: 10.1038/ni921 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Zhang S-Y, Jouanguy E, Ugolini S, Smahi A, Elain G, Romero P, Segal D, Sancho-Shimizu V, Lorenzo L, Puel A, et al. 2007. TLR3 deficiency in patients with herpes simplex encephalitis. Science 317:1522–1527. doi: 10.1126/science.1139522 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Pérez de Diego R, Sancho-Shimizu V, Lorenzo L, Puel A, Plancoulaine S, Picard C, Herman M, Cardon A, Durandy A, Bustamante J, Vallabhapurapu S, Bravo J, Warnatz K, Chaix Y, Cascarrigny F, Lebon P, Rozenberg F, Karin M, Tardieu M, Al-Muhsen S, Jouanguy E, Zhang S-Y, Abel L, Casanova J-L. 2010. Human TRAF3 adaptor molecule deficiency leads to impaired toll-like receptor 3 response and susceptibility to herpes simplex encephalitis. Immunity 33:400–411. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.08.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Sancho-Shimizu V, Pérez de Diego R, Lorenzo L, Halwani R, Alangari A, Israelsson E, Fabrega S, Cardon A, Maluenda J, Tatematsu M, et al. 2011. Herpes simplex encephalitis in children with autosomal recessive and dominant TRIF deficiency. J Clin Invest 121:4889–4902. doi: 10.1172/JCI59259 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Celhar T, Magalhães R, Fairhurst AM. 2012. TLR7 and TLR9 in SLE: when sensing self goes wrong. Immunol Res 53:58–77. doi: 10.1007/s12026-012-8270-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Fillatreau S, Manfroi B, Dörner T. 2021. Toll-like receptor signalling in B cells during systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Rev Rheumatol 17:98–108. doi: 10.1038/s41584-020-00544-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Sun L, Wu J, Du F, Chen X, Chen ZJ. 2013. Cyclic GMP-AMP synthase is a cytosolic DNA sensor that activates the type I interferon pathway. Science 339:786–791. doi: 10.1126/science.1232458 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Ablasser A, Goldeck M, Cavlar T, Deimling T, Witte G, Röhl I, Hopfner K-P, Ludwig J, Hornung V. 2013. cGAS produces a 2’-5’-linked cyclic dinucleotide second messenger that activates STING. Nature 498:380–384. doi: 10.1038/nature12306 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Zhang C, Shang G, Gui X, Zhang X, Bai X-C, Chen ZJ. 2019. Structural basis of STING binding with and phosphorylation by TBK1. Nature 567:394–398. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1000-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Burdette DL, Vance RE. 2013. STING and the innate immune response to nucleic acids in the cytosol. Nat Immunol 14:19–26. doi: 10.1038/ni.2491 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Tanaka Y, Chen ZJ. 2012. STING specifies IRF3 phosphorylation by TBK1 in the cytosolic DNA signaling pathway. Sci Signal 5:ra20. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2002521 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Ishikawa H, Barber GN. 2008. STING is an endoplasmic reticulum adaptor that facilitates innate immune signalling. Nature 455:674–678. doi: 10.1038/nature07317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Liu D, Wu H, Wang C, Li Y, Tian H, Siraj S, Sehgal SA, Wang X, Wang J, Shang Y, Jiang Z, Liu L, Chen Q. 2019. STING directly activates autophagy to tune the innate immune response. Cell Death Differ 26:1735–1749. doi: 10.1038/s41418-018-0251-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Gui X, Yang H, Li T, Tan X, Shi P, Li M, Du F, Chen ZJ. 2019. Autophagy induction via STING trafficking is a primordial function of the cGAS pathway. Nature 567:262–266. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1006-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Deng Z, Chong Z, Law CS, Mukai K, Ho FO, Martinu T, Backes BJ, Eckalbar WL, Taguchi T, Shum AK. 2020. A defect in COPI-mediated transport of STING causes immune dysregulation in COPA syndrome. J Exp Med 217:e20201045. doi: 10.1084/jem.20201045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Mukai K, Ogawa E, Uematsu R, Kuchitsu Y, Kiku F, Uemura T, Waguri S, Suzuki T, Dohmae N, Arai H, Shum AK, Taguchi T. 2021. Homeostatic regulation of STING by retrograde membrane traffic to the ER. Nat Commun 12:61. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20234-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Konno H, Konno K, Barber GN. 2013. Cyclic dinucleotides trigger ULK1 (ATG1) phosphorylation of STING to prevent sustained innate immune signaling. Cell 155:688–698. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Volkman HE, Cambier S, Gray EE, Stetson DB. 2019. Tight nuclear tethering of cGAS is essential for preventing autoreactivity. Elife 8:e47491. doi: 10.7554/eLife.47491 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Michalski S, de Oliveira Mann CC, Stafford CA, Witte G, Bartho J, Lammens K, Hornung V, Hopfner K-P. 2020. Structural basis for sequestration and autoinhibition of cGAS by chromatin. Nature 587:678–682. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2748-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Guey B, Wischnewski M, Decout A, Makasheva K, Kaynak M, Sakar MS, Fierz B, Ablasser A. 2020. BAF restricts cGAS on nuclear DNA to prevent innate immune activation. Science 369:823–828. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw6421 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Zhao B, Xu P, Rowlett CM, Jing T, Shinde O, Lei Y, West AP, Liu WR, Li P. 2020. The molecular basis of tight nuclear tethering and inactivation of cGAS. Nature 587:673–677. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2749-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Boyer JA, Spangler CJ, Strauss JD, Cesmat AP, Liu P, McGinty RK, Zhang Q. 2020. Structural basis of nucleosome-dependent cGAS inhibition. Science 370:450–454. doi: 10.1126/science.abd0609 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Lepelley A, Martin-Niclós MJ, Le Bihan M, Marsh JA, Uggenti C, Rice GI, Bondet V, Duffy D, Hertzog J, Rehwinkel J, et al. 2020. Mutations in COPA lead to abnormal trafficking of STING to the Golgi and interferon signaling. J Exp Med 217:e20200600. doi: 10.1084/jem.20200600 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Melki I, Rose Y, Uggenti C, Van Eyck L, Frémond M-L, Kitabayashi N, Rice GI, Jenkinson EM, Boulai A, Jeremiah N, et al. 2017. Disease-associated mutations identify a novel region in human STING necessary for the control of type I interferon signaling. J Allergy Clin Immunol 140:543–552. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.10.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Wang H, Bloom O, Zhang M, Vishnubhakat JM, Ombrellino M, Che J, Frazier A, Yang H, Ivanova S, Borovikova L, Manogue KR, Faist E, Abraham E, Andersson J, Andersson U, Molina PE, Abumrad NN, Sama A, Tracey KJ. 1999. HMG-1 as a late mediator of endotoxin lethality in mice. Science 285:248–251. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5425.248 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Burleigh K, Maltbaek JH, Cambier S, Green R, Gale M Jr, James RC, Stetson DB. 2020. Human DNA-PK activates a STING-independent DNA sensing pathway. Sci Immunol 5:eaba4219. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aba4219 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Rehwinkel J, Gack MU. 2020. RIG-I-like receptors: their regulation and roles in RNA sensing. Nat Rev Immunol 20:537–551. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-0288-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Yoneyama M, Onomoto K, Jogi M, Akaboshi T, Fujita T. 2015. Viral RNA detection by RIG-I-like receptors. Curr Opin Immunol 32:48–53. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2014.12.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Zhao Y, Ye X, Dunker W, Song Y, Karijolich J. 2018. RIG-I like receptor sensing of host RNAs facilitates the cell-intrinsic immune response to KSHV infection. Nat Commun 9:4841. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07314-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Seth RB, Sun L, Ea C-K, Chen ZJ. 2005. Identification and characterization of MAVS, a mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein that activates NF-κB and IRF3. Cell 122:669–682. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Hornung V, Ellegast J, Kim S, Brzózka K, Jung A, Kato H, Poeck H, Akira S, Conzelmann K-K, Schlee M, Endres S, Hartmann G. 2006. 5’-Triphosphate RNA is the ligand for RIG-I. Science 314:994–997. doi: 10.1126/science.1132505 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Pichlmair A, Schulz O, Tan C-P, Rehwinkel J, Kato H, Takeuchi O, Akira S, Way M, Schiavo G, Reis e Sousa C. 2009. Activation of MDA5 requires higher-order RNA structures generated during virus infection. J Virol 83:10761–10769. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00770-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Gack MU, Shin YC, Joo C-H, Urano T, Liang C, Sun L, Takeuchi O, Akira S, Chen Z, Inoue S, Jung JU. 2007. TRIM25 RING-finger E3 ubiquitin ligase is essential for RIG-I-mediated antiviral activity. Nature 446:916–920. doi: 10.1038/nature05732 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Wang W, Jiang M, Liu S, Zhang S, Liu W, Ma Y, Zhang L, Zhang J, Cao X. 2016. RNF122 suppresses antiviral type I interferon production by targeting RIG-I CARDs to mediate RIG-I degradation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:9581–9586. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1604277113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Arimoto K, Takahashi H, Hishiki T, Konishi H, Fujita T, Shimotohno K. 2007. Negative regulation of the RIG-I signaling by the ubiquitin ligase RNF125. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:7500–7505. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611551104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Inn K-S, Gack MU, Tokunaga F, Shi M, Wong L-Y, Iwai K, Jung JU. 2011. Linear ubiquitin assembly complex negatively regulates RIG-I- and TRIM25-mediated type I interferon induction. Mol Cell 41:354–365. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.12.029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Lang X, Tang T, Jin T, Ding C, Zhou R, Jiang W. 2017. TRIM65-catalized ubiquitination is essential for MDA5-mediated antiviral innate immunity. J Exp Med 214:459–473. doi: 10.1084/jem.20160592 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Liu S, Chen J, Cai X, Wu J, Chen X, Wu Y-T, Sun L, Chen ZJ. 2013. MAVS recruits multiple ubiquitin E3 ligases to activate antiviral signaling cascades. Elife 2:e00785. doi: 10.7554/eLife.00785 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Hou F, Sun L, Zheng H, Skaug B, Jiang Q-X, Chen ZJ. 2011. MAVS forms functional prion-like aggregates to activate and propagate antiviral innate immune response. Cell 146:448–461. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.06.041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Oda H, Nakagawa K, Abe J, Awaya T, Funabiki M, Hijikata A, Nishikomori R, Funatsuka M, Ohshima Y, Sugawara Y, Yasumi T, Kato H, Shirai T, Ohara O, Fujita T, Heike T. 2014. Aicardi-Goutières syndrome is caused by IFIH1 mutations. Am J Hum Genet 95:121–125. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.06.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Cen H, Wang W, Leng R-X, Wang T-Y, Pan H-F, Fan Y-G, Wang B, Ye D-Q. 2013. Association of IFIH1 rs1990760 polymorphism with susceptibility to autoimmune diseases: a meta-analysis. Autoimmunity 46:455–462. doi: 10.3109/08916934.2013.796937 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Asgari S, Schlapbach LJ, Anchisi S, Hammer C, Bartha I, Junier T, Mottet-Osman G, Posfay-Barbe KM, Longchamp D, Stocker M, Cordey S, Kaiser L, Riedel T, Kenna T, Long D, Schibler A, Telenti A, Tapparel C, McLaren PJ, Garcin D, Fellay J. 2017. Severe viral respiratory infections in children with IFIH1 loss-of-function mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:8342–8347. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1704259114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Wang Y, Holleufer A, Gad HH, Hartmann R. 2020. Length dependent activation of OAS proteins by dsRNA. Cytokine 126:154867. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2019.154867 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Maurano M, Snyder JM, Connelly C, Henao-Mejia J, Sidrauski C, Stetson DB. 2021. Protein kinase R and the integrated stress response drive immunopathology caused by mutations in the RNA deaminase ADAR1. Immunity 54:1948–1960. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2021.07.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Pestal K, Funk CC, Snyder JM, Price ND, Treuting PM, Stetson DB. 2015. Isoforms of RNA-editing enzyme ADAR1 independently control nucleic acid sensor MDA5-driven autoimmunity and multi-organ development. Immunity 43:933–944. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.11.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Ivashkiv LB, Donlin LT. 2014. Regulation of type I interferon responses. Nat Rev Immunol 14:36–49. doi: 10.1038/nri3581 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Platanitis E, Demiroz D, Schneller A, Fischer K, Capelle C, Hartl M, Gossenreiter T, Müller M, Novatchkova M, Decker T. 2019. A molecular switch from STAT2-IRF9 to ISGF3 underlies interferon-induced gene transcription. Nat Commun 10:2921. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10970-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Siednienko J, Jackson R, Mellett M, Delagic N, Yang S, Wang B, Tang LS, Callanan JJ, Mahon BP, Moynagh PN. 2012. Pellino3 targets the IRF7 pathway and facilitates autoregulation of TLR3- and viral-induced expression of type I interferons. Nat Immunol 13:1055–1062. doi: 10.1038/ni.2429 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Pegram HJ, Andrews DM, Smyth MJ, Darcy PK, Kershaw MH. 2011. Activating and inhibitory receptors of natural killer cells. Immunol Cell Biol 89:216–224. doi: 10.1038/icb.2010.78 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Nakahira M, Tomura M, Iwasaki M, Ahn HJ, Bian Y, Hamaoka T, Ohta T, Kurimoto M, Fujiwara H. 2001. An absolute requirement for STAT4 and a role for IFN-γ as an amplifying factor in IL-12 induction of the functional IL-18 receptor complex. J Immunol 167:1306–1312. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.3.1306 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Lee AJ, Ashkar AA. 2018. The dual nature of type I and type II interferons. Front Immunol 9:2061. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02061 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. MacMicking J, Xie QW, Nathan C. 1997. Nitric oxide and macrophage function. Annu Rev Immunol 15:323–350. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.15.1.323 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Kang K, Park SH, Chen J, Qiao Y, Giannopoulou E, Berg K, Hanidu A, Li J, Nabozny G, Kang K, Park-Min K-H, Ivashkiv LB. 2017. Interferon-γ represses M2 gene expression in human macrophages by disassembling enhancers bound by the transcription factor MAF. Immunity 47:235–250. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.07.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Zhou J, Wang Y, Chang Q, Ma P, Hu Y, Cao X. 2018. Type III interferons in viral infection and antiviral immunity. Cell Physiol Biochem 51:173–185. doi: 10.1159/000495172 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Fink SL, Cookson BT. 2006. Caspase-1-dependent pore formation during pyroptosis leads to osmotic lysis of infected host macrophages. Cell Microbiol 8:1812–1825. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00751.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Amezcua-Guerra LM, Márquez-Velasco R, Chávez-Rueda AK, Castillo-Martínez D, Massó F, Páez A, Colín-Fuentes J, Bojalil R. 2017. Type III interferons in systemic lupus erythematosus: association between interferon λ3, disease activity, and anti-Ro/SSA antibodies. J Clin Rheumatol 23:368–375. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000000581 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Livingston JH, Stivaros S, Van Der Knaap MS, Crow YJ. 2013. Recognizable phenotypes associated with intracranial calcification. Develop Med Child Neuro 55:46–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2012.04437.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Crow YJ, Leitch A, Hayward BE, Garner A, Parmar R, Griffith E, Ali M, Semple C, Aicardi J, Babul-Hirji R, et al. 2006. Mutations in genes encoding ribonuclease H2 subunits cause Aicardi-Goutières syndrome and mimic congenital viral brain infection. Nat Genet 38:910–916. doi: 10.1038/ng1842 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Stetson DB, Ko JS, Heidmann T, Medzhitov R. 2008. Trex1 prevents cell-intrinsic initiation of autoimmunity. Cell 134:587–598. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Coquel F, Silva M-J, Técher H, Zadorozhny K, Sharma S, Nieminuszczy J, Mettling C, Dardillac E, Barthe A, Schmitz A-L, Promonet A, Cribier A, Sarrazin A, Niedzwiedz W, Lopez B, Costanzo V, Krejci L, Chabes A, Benkirane M, Lin Y-L, Pasero P. 2018. SAMHD1 acts at stalled replication forks to prevent interferon induction. Nature 557:57–61. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0050-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Liddicoat BJ, Piskol R, Chalk AM, Ramaswami G, Higuchi M, Hartner JC, Li JB, Seeburg PH, Walkley CR. 2015. RNA editing by ADAR1 prevents MDA5 sensing of endogenous dsRNA as nonself. Science 349:1115–1120. doi: 10.1126/science.aac7049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Livingston JH, Lin J-P, Dale RC, Gill D, Brogan P, Munnich A, Kurian MA, Gonzalez-Martinez V, De Goede CGEL, Falconer A, Forte G, Jenkinson EM, Kasher PR, Szynkiewicz M, Rice GI, Crow YJ. 2014. A type I interferon signature identifies bilateral striatal necrosis due to mutations in ADAR1. J Med Genet 51:76–82. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2013-102038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Nejentsev S, Walker N, Riches D, Egholm M, Todd JA. 2009. Rare variants of IFIH1, a gene implicated in antiviral responses, protect against type 1 diabetes. Science 324:387–389. doi: 10.1126/science.1167728 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Crow Y, Keshavan N, Barbet JP, Bercu G, Bondet V, Boussard C, Dedieu N, Duffy D, Hully M, Giardini A, Gitiaux C, Rice GI, Seabra L, Bader-Meunier B, Rahman S. 2020. Cardiac valve involvement in ADAR-related type I interferonopathy. J Med Genet 57:475–478. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106457 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Eder PS, Walder RY, Walder JA. 1993. Substrate specificity of human RNase H1 and its role in excision repair of ribose residues misincorporated in DNA. Biochimie 75:123–126. doi: 10.1016/0300-9084(93)90033-o [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Sparks JL, Chon H, Cerritelli SM, Kunkel TA, Johansson E, Crouch RJ, Burgers PM. 2012. RNase H2-initiated ribonucleotide excision repair. Mol Cell 47:980–986. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.06.035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Mackenzie KJ, Carroll P, Lettice L, Tarnauskaitė Ž, Reddy K, Dix F, Revuelta A, Abbondati E, Rigby RE, Rabe B, Kilanowski F, Grimes G, Fluteau A, Devenney PS, Hill RE, Reijns MA, Jackson AP. 2016. Ribonuclease H2 mutations induce a cGAS/STING-dependent innate immune response. EMBO J 35:831–844. doi: 10.15252/embj.201593339 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Humphries F, Fitzgerald KA. 2020. Loosening the grip on nuclear cGAS. Nat Genet 52:1269–1270. doi: 10.1038/s41588-020-00746-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Lin B, Berard R, Al Rasheed A, Aladba B, Kranzusch PJ, Henderlight M, Grom A, Kahle D, Torreggiani S, Aue AG, Mitchell J, de Jesus AA, Schulert GS, Goldbach-Mansky R. 2020. A novel STING1 variant causes a recessive form of STING-associated vasculopathy with onset in infancy (SAVI). J Allergy Clin Immunol 146:1204–1208. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.06.032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Motwani M, Pawaria S, Bernier J, Moses S, Henry K, Fang T, Burkly L, Marshak-Rothstein A, Fitzgerald KA. 2019. Hierarchy of clinical manifestations in SAVI N153S and V154M mouse models. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116:7941–7950. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1818281116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Warner JD, Irizarry-Caro RA, Bennion BG, Ai TL, Smith AM, Miner CA, Sakai T, Gonugunta VK, Wu J, Platt DJ, Yan N, Miner JJ. 2017. STING-associated vasculopathy develops independently of IRF3 in mice. J Exp Med 214:3279–3292. doi: 10.1084/jem.20171351 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Shmuel-Galia L, Humphries F, Lei X, Ceglia S, Wilson R, Jiang Z, Ketelut-Carneiro N, Foley SE, Pechhold S, Houghton J, Muneeruddin K, Shaffer SA, McCormick BA, Reboldi A, Ward D, Marshak-Rothstein A, Fitzgerald KA. 2021. Dysbiosis exacerbates colitis by promoting ubiquitination and accumulation of the innate immune adaptor STING in myeloid cells. Immunity 54:1137–1153. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2021.05.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Sanchez GAM, Reinhardt A, Ramsey S, Wittkowski H, Hashkes PJ, Berkun Y, Schalm S, Murias S, Dare JA, Brown D, et al. 2018. JAK1/2 inhibition with baricitinib in the treatment of autoinflammatory interferonopathies. J Clin Invest 128:3041–3052. doi: 10.1172/JCI98814 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Ergun SL, Fernandez D, Weiss TM, Li L. 2019. STING polymer structure reveals mechanisms for activation, hyperactivation, and inhibition. Cell 178:290–301. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Okada S, Asano T, Moriya K, Boisson-Dupuis S, Kobayashi M, Casanova J-L, Puel A. 2020. Human STAT1 gain-of-function heterozygous mutations: chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis and type I interferonopathy. J Clin Immunol 40:1065–1081. doi: 10.1007/s10875-020-00847-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Liu L, Okada S, Kong X-F, Kreins AY, Cypowyj S, Abhyankar A, Toubiana J, Itan Y, Audry M, Nitschke P, et al. 2011. Gain-of-function human STAT1 mutations impair IL-17 immunity and underlie chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis. J Exp Med 208:1635–1648. doi: 10.1084/jem.20110958 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Agarwal S, Vierbuchen T, Ghosh S, Chan J, Jiang Z, Kandasamy RK, Ricci E, Fitzgerald KA. 2020. The long non-coding RNA LUCAT1 is a negative feedback regulator of interferon responses in humans. Nat Commun 11:6348. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20165-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Martin-Fernandez M, Bravo García-Morato M, Gruber C, Murias Loza S, Malik MNH, Alsohime F, Alakeel A, Valdez R, Buta S, Buda G, et al. 2020. Systemic type I IFN inflammation in human ISG15 deficiency leads to necrotizing skin lesions. Cell Rep 31:107633. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107633 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Bogunovic D, Byun M, Durfee LA, Abhyankar A, Sanal O, Mansouri D, Salem S, Radovanovic I, Grant AV, Adimi P, et al. 2012. Mycobacterial disease and impaired IFN-γ immunity in humans with inherited ISG15 deficiency. Science 337:1684–1688. doi: 10.1126/science.1224026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Jiménez Fernández D, Hess S, Knobeloch K-P. 2019. Strategies to target ISG15 and USP18 toward therapeutic applications. Front Chem 7:923. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2019.00923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Meuwissen MEC, Schot R, Buta S, Oudesluijs G, Tinschert S, Speer SD, Li Z, van Unen L, Heijsman D, Goldmann T, et al. 2016. Human USP18 deficiency underlies type 1 interferonopathy leading to severe pseudo-TORCH syndrome. J Exp Med 213:1163–1174. doi: 10.1084/jem.20151529 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Torrelo A, Patel S, Colmenero I, Gurbindo D, Lendínez F, Hernández A, López-Robledillo JC, Dadban A, Requena L, Paller AS. 2010. Chronic atypical neutrophilic dermatosis with lipodystrophy and elevated temperature (CANDLE) syndrome. J Am Acad Dermatol 62:489–495. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.04.046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Cavalcante MPV, Brunelli JB, Miranda CC, Novak GV, Malle L, Aikawa NE, Jesus AA, Silva CA. 2016. CANDLE syndrome: chronic atypical neutrophilic dermatosis with lipodystrophy and elevated temperature—a rare case with a novel mutation. Eur J Pediatr 175:735–740. doi: 10.1007/s00431-015-2668-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Torrelo A. 2017. CANDLE syndrome as a paradigm of proteasome-related autoinflammation. Front Immunol 8:927. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00927 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Brehm A, Liu Y, Sheikh A, Marrero B, Omoyinmi E, Zhou Q, Montealegre G, Biancotto A, Reinhardt A, Almeida de Jesus A, et al. 2015. Additive loss-of-function proteasome subunit mutations in CANDLE/PRAAS patients promote type I IFN production. J Clin Invest 125:4196–4211. doi: 10.1172/JCI81260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Montealegre G, Reinhardt A, Brogan P, Berkun Y, Zlotogorski A, Brown D, Chira P, Gao L, Dare J, Schalm S, et al. 2015. Preliminary response to Janus kinase inhibition with baricitinib in chronic atypical neutrophilic dermatosis with lipodystrophy and elevated temperatures (CANDLE). Pediatr Rheumatol 13. doi: 10.1186/1546-0096-13-S1-O31 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Damgaard RB, Elliott PR, Swatek KN, Maher ER, Stepensky P, Elpeleg O, Komander D, Berkun Y. 2019. OTULIN deficiency in ORAS causes cell type-specific LUBAC degradation, dysregulated TNF signalling and cell death. EMBO Mol Med 11:e9324. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201809324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Damgaard RB, Walker JA, Marco-Casanova P, Morgan NV, Titheradge HL, Elliott PR, McHale D, Maher ER, McKenzie ANJ, Komander D. 2016. The deubiquitinase OTULIN is an essential negative regulator of inflammation and autoimmunity. Cell 166:1215–1230. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.07.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Zhang Q, Bastard P, Liu Z, Le Pen J, Moncada-Velez M, Chen J, Ogishi M, Sabli IKD, Hodeib S, Korol C, et al. 2020. Inborn errors of type I IFN immunity in patients with life-threatening COVID-19. Science 370:eabd4570. doi: 10.1126/science.abd4570 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Tucker MH, Yu W, Menden H, Xia S, Schreck CF, Gibson M, Louiselle D, Pastinen T, Raje N, Sampath V. 2023. IRF7 and UNC93B1 variants in an infant with recurrent herpes simplex virus infection. J Clin Invest 133:e154016. doi: 10.1172/JCI154016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Herman M, Ciancanelli M, Ou Y-H, Lorenzo L, Klaudel-Dreszler M, Pauwels E, Sancho-Shimizu V, Pérez de Diego R, Abhyankar A, Israelsson E, Guo Y, Cardon A, Rozenberg F, Lebon P, Tardieu M, Heropolitanska-Pliszka E, Chaussabel D, White MA, Abel L, Zhang S-Y, Casanova J-L. 2012. Heterozygous TBK1 mutations impair TLR3 immunity and underlie herpes simplex encephalitis of childhood. J Exp Med 209:1567–1582. doi: 10.1084/jem.20111316 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Andersen LL, Mørk N, Reinert LS, Kofod-Olsen E, Narita R, Jørgensen SE, Skipper KA, Höning K, Gad HH, Østergaard L, Ørntoft TF, Hornung V, Paludan SR, Mikkelsen JG, Fujita T, Christiansen M, Hartmann R, Mogensen TH. 2015. Functional IRF3 deficiency in a patient with herpes simplex encephalitis. J Exp Med 212:1371–1379. doi: 10.1084/jem.20142274 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Bastard P, Manry J, Chen J, Rosain J, Seeleuthner Y, AbuZaitun O, Lorenzo L, Khan T, Hasek M, Hernandez N, et al. 2021. Herpes simplex encephalitis in a patient with a distinctive form of inherited IFNAR1 deficiency. J Clin Invest 131:e139980. doi: 10.1172/JCI139980 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Richards A, van den Maagdenberg AMJM, Jen JC, Kavanagh D, Bertram P, Spitzer D, Liszewski MK, Barilla-Labarca M-L, Terwindt GM, Kasai Y, et al. 2007. C-terminal truncations in human 3’-5’ DNA exonuclease TREX1 cause autosomal dominant retinal vasculopathy with cerebral leukodystrophy. Nat Genet 39:1068–1070. doi: 10.1038/ng2082 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Morita M, Stamp G, Robins P, Dulic A, Rosewell I, Hrivnak G, Daly G, Lindahl T, Barnes DE. 2004. Gene-targeted mice lacking the Trex1 (DNase III) 3’-->5’ DNA exonuclease develop inflammatory myocarditis. Mol Cell Biol 24:6719–6727. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.15.6719-6727.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Grieves JL, Fye JM, Harvey S, Grayson JM, Hollis T, Perrino FW. 2015. Exonuclease TREX1 degrades double-stranded DNA to prevent spontaneous lupus-like inflammatory disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:5117–5122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1423804112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Gao D, Li T, Li X-D, Chen X, Li Q-Z, Wight-Carter M, Chen ZJ. 2015. Activation of cyclic GMP-AMP synthase by self-DNA causes autoimmune diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:E5699–E5705. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1516465112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Gray EE, Treuting PM, Woodward JJ, Stetson DB. 2015. Cutting edge: cGAS Is required for lethal autoimmune disease in the Trex1-deficient mouse model of Aicardi–Goutières syndrome. J Immunol 195:1939–1943. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1500969 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Goldstone DC, Ennis-Adeniran V, Hedden JJ, Groom HCT, Rice GI, Christodoulou E, Walker PA, Kelly G, Haire LF, Yap MW, de Carvalho LPS, Stoye JP, Crow YJ, Taylor IA, Webb M. 2011. HIV-1 restriction factor SAMHD1 is a deoxynucleoside triphosphate triphosphohydrolase. Nature 480:379–382. doi: 10.1038/nature10623 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Lee EJ, Seo JH, Park J-H, Vo TTL, An S, Bae S-J, Le H, Lee HS, Wee H-J, Lee D, Chung Y-H, Kim JA, Jang M-K, Ryu SH, Yu E, Jang SH, Park ZY, Kim K-W. 2017. SAMHD1 acetylation enhances its deoxynucleotide triphosphohydrolase activity and promotes cancer cell proliferation. Oncotarget 8:68517–68529. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19704 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Cribier A, Descours B, Valadão ALC, Laguette N, Benkirane M. 2013. Phosphorylation of SAMHD1 by cyclin A2/CDK1 regulates its restriction activity toward HIV-1. Cell Rep 3:1036–1043. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.03.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Schott K, Fuchs NV, Derua R, Mahboubi B, Schnellbächer E, Seifried J, Tondera C, Schmitz H, Shepard C, Brandariz-Nuñez A, Diaz-Griffero F, Reuter A, Kim B, Janssens V, König R. 2018. Dephosphorylation of the HIV-1 restriction factor SAMHD1 is mediated by PP2A-B55α holoenzymes during mitotic exit. Nat Commun 9:2227. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04671-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Mauney CH, Rogers LC, Harris RS, Daniel LW, Devarie-Baez NO, Wu H, Furdui CM, Poole LB, Perrino FW, Hollis T. 2017. The SAMHD1 dNTP triphosphohydrolase is controlled by a redox switch. Antioxid Redox Signal 27:1317–1331. doi: 10.1089/ars.2016.6888 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Rehwinkel J, Maelfait J, Bridgeman A, Rigby R, Hayward B, Liberatore RA, Bieniasz PD, Towers GJ, Moita LF, Crow YJ, Bonthron DT, Reis e Sousa C. 2013. SAMHD1-dependent retroviral control and escape in mice. EMBO J 32:2454–2462. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2013.163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Nishikura K. 2010. Functions and regulation of RNA editing by ADAR deaminases. Annu Rev Biochem 79:321–349. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060208-105251 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Nishikura K. 2006. Editor meets silencer: crosstalk between RNA editing and RNA interference. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7:919–931. doi: 10.1038/nrm2061 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. Hartner JC, Walkley CR, Lu J, Orkin SH. 2009. ADAR1 is essential for the maintenance of hematopoiesis and suppression of interferon signaling. Nat Immunol 10:109–115. doi: 10.1038/ni.1680 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Ward SV, George CX, Welch MJ, Liou L-Y, Hahm B, Lewicki H, de la Torre JC, Samuel CE, Oldstone MB. 2011. RNA editing enzyme adenosine deaminase is a restriction factor for controlling measles virus replication that also is required for embryogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:331–336. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1017241108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. Smyth DJ, Cooper JD, Bailey R, Field S, Burren O, Smink LJ, Guja C, Ionescu-Tirgoviste C, Widmer B, Dunger DB, Savage DA, Walker NM, Clayton DG, Todd JA. 2006. A genome-wide association study of nonsynonymous SNPs identifies a type 1 diabetes locus in the interferon-induced helicase (IFIH1) region. Nat Genet 38:617–619. doi: 10.1038/ng1800 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143. Martínez A, Varadé J, Lamas JR, Fernández-Arquero M, Jover JA, de la Concha EG, Fernández-Gutiérrez B, Urcelay E. 2008. Association of the IFIH1-GCA-KCNH7 chromosomal region with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 67:137–138. doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.073213 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144. Cunninghame Graham DS, Morris DL, Bhangale TR, Criswell LA, Syvänen A-C, Rönnblom L, Behrens TW, Graham RR, Vyse TJ. 2011. Association of NCF2, IKZF1, IRF8, IFIH1, and TYK2 with systemic lupus erythematosus. PLOS Genet 7:e1002341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002341 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145. Sheng Y, Jin X, Xu J, Gao J, Du X, Duan D, Li B, Zhao J, Zhan W, Tang H, et al. 2014. Sequencing-based approach identified three new susceptibility loci for psoriasis. Nat Commun 5:4331. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5331 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146. Picard C, Thouvenin G, Kannengiesser C, Dubus J-C, Jeremiah N, Rieux-Laucat F, Crestani B, Belot A, Thivolet-Béjui F, Secq V, Ménard C, Reynaud-Gaubert M, Reix P. 2016. Severe pulmonary fibrosis as the first manifestation of interferonopathy (TMEM173 mutation). Chest 150:e65–e71. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.02.682 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147. Bennion BG, Ingle H, Ai TL, Miner CA, Platt DJ, Smith AM, Baldridge MT, Miner JJ. 2019. A human gain-of-function STING mutation causes immunodeficiency and gammaherpesvirus-induced pulmonary fibrosis in mice. J Virol 93:e01806-18. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01806-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148. Liu Y, Jesus AA, Marrero B, Yang D, Ramsey SE, Montealegre Sanchez GA, Tenbrock K, Wittkowski H, Jones OY, Kuehn HS, et al. 2014. Activated STING in a vascular and pulmonary syndrome. N Engl J Med 371:507–518. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1312625 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149. Liu Y, Jesus AA, Marrero B, Yang D, Ramsey SE, Sanchez GAM, Tenbrock K, Wittkowski H, Jones OY, Kuehn HS, et al. 2014. Activated STING in a vascular and pulmonary syndrome. N Engl J Med 371:507–518. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1312625 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150. Luksch H, Stinson WA, Platt DJ, Qian W, Kalugotla G, Miner CA, Bennion BG, Gerbaulet A, Rösen-Wolff A, Miner JJ. 2019. STING-associated lung disease in mice relies on T cells but not type I interferon. J Allergy Clin Immunol 144:254–266. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.01.044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151. Brandizzi F, Barlowe C. 2013. Organization of the ER-Golgi interface for membrane traffic control. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 14:382–392. doi: 10.1038/nrm3588 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152. Dorman SE, Holland SM. 1998. Mutation in the signal-transducing chain of the interferon-gamma receptor and susceptibility to mycobacterial infection. J Clin Invest 101:2364–2369. doi: 10.1172/JCI2901 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153. Sliter DA, Martinez J, Hao L, Chen X, Sun N, Fischer TD, Burman JL, Li Y, Zhang Z, Narendra DP, Cai H, Borsche M, Klein C, Youle RJ. 2018. Parkin and PINK1 mitigate STING-induced inflammation. Nature 561:258–262. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0448-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 154. Perng Y-C, Lenschow DJ. 2018. ISG15 in antiviral immunity and beyond. Nat Rev Microbiol 16:423–439. doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0020-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155. Lenschow DJ, Lai C, Frias-Staheli N, Giannakopoulos NV, Lutz A, Wolff T, Osiak A, Levine B, Schmidt RE, García-Sastre A, Leib DA, Pekosz A, Knobeloch K-P, Horak I, Virgin HW IV. 2007. IFN-stimulated gene 15 functions as a critical antiviral molecule against influenza, herpes, and Sindbis viruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:1371–1376. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0607038104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156. Arimoto K, Löchte S, Stoner SA, Burkart C, Zhang Y, Miyauchi S, Wilmes S, Fan J-B, Heinisch JJ, Li Z, Yan M, Pellegrini S, Colland F, Piehler J, Zhang D-E. 2017. STAT2 is an essential adaptor in USP18-mediated suppression of type I interferon signaling. Nat Struct Mol Biol 24:279–289. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3378 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157. Agarwal AK, Xing C, DeMartino GN, Mizrachi D, Hernandez MD, Sousa AB, Martínez de Villarreal L, dos Santos HG, Garg A. 2010. PSMB8 encoding the β5i proteasome subunit is mutated in joint contractures, muscle atrophy, microcytic anemia, and panniculitis-induced lipodystrophy syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 87:866–872. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.10.031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158. Kitamura A, Maekawa Y, Uehara H, Izumi K, Kawachi I, Nishizawa M, Toyoshima Y, Takahashi H, Standley DM, Tanaka K, Hamazaki J, Murata S, Obara K, Toyoshima I, Yasutomo K. 2011. A mutation in the immunoproteasome subunit PSMB8 causes autoinflammation and lipodystrophy in humans. J Clin Invest 121:4150–4160. doi: 10.1172/JCI58414 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159. Ramot Y, Czarnowicki T, Maly A, Navon-Elkan P, Zlotogorski A. 2011. Chronic atypical neutrophilic dermatosis with lipodystrophy and elevated temperature syndrome: a case report. Pediatr Dermatol 28:538–541. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.2010.01163.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160. Stohwasser R, Kuckelkorn U, Kraft R, Kostka S, Kloetzel PM. 1996. 20S proteasome from LMP7 knock out mice reveals altered proteolytic activities and cleavage site preferences. FEBS Lett 383:109–113. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(96)00110-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161. Ikeda F, Deribe YL, Skånland SS, Stieglitz B, Grabbe C, Franz-Wachtel M, van Wijk SJL, Goswami P, Nagy V, Terzic J, Tokunaga F, Androulidaki A, Nakagawa T, Pasparakis M, Iwai K, Sundberg JP, Schaefer L, Rittinger K, Macek B, Dikic I. 2011. SHARPIN forms a linear ubiquitin ligase complex regulating NF-κB activity and apoptosis. Nature 471:637–641. doi: 10.1038/nature09814 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162. Zuo Y, Feng Q, Jin L, Huang F, Miao Y, Liu J, Xu Y, Chen X, Zhang H, Guo T, Yuan Y, Zhang L, Wang J, Zheng H. 2020. Regulation of the linear ubiquitination of STAT1 controls antiviral interferon signaling. Nat Commun 11:1146. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14948-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163. Heger K, Wickliffe KE, Ndoja A, Zhang J, Murthy A, Dugger DL, Maltzman A, de Sousa E Melo F, Hung J, Zeng Y, Verschueren E, Kirkpatrick DS, Vucic D, Lee WP, Roose-Girma M, Newman RJ, Warming S, Hsiao Y-C, Kőműves LG, Webster JD, Newton K, Dixit VM. 2018. OTULIN limits cell death and inflammation by deubiquitinating LUBAC. Nature 559:120–124. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0256-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164. Damgaard RB, Jolin HE, Allison MED, Davies SE, Titheradge HL, McKenzie ANJ, Komander D. 2020. OTULIN protects the liver against cell death, inflammation, fibrosis, and cancer. Cell Death Differ 27:1457–1474. doi: 10.1038/s41418-020-0532-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165. Zhou Q, Yu X, Demirkaya E, Deuitch N, Stone D, Tsai WL, Kuehn HS, Wang H, Yang D, Park YH, et al. 2016. Biallelic hypomorphic mutations in a linear deubiquitinase define otulipenia, an early-onset autoinflammatory disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:10127–10132. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1612594113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166. Nair H, Simões EA, Rudan I, Gessner BD, Azziz-Baumgartner E, Zhang JSF, Feikin DR, Mackenzie GA, Moiïsi JC, Roca A, et al. 2013. Global and regional burden of hospital admissions for severe acute lower respiratory infections in young children in 2010: a systematic analysis. Lancet 381:1380–1390. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61901-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167. Liu L, Oza S, Hogan D, Perin J, Rudan I, Lawn JE, Cousens S, Mathers C, Black RE. 2015. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality in 2000–13, with projections to inform post-2015 priorities: an updated systematic analysis. Lancet 385:430–440. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61698-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168. Jouanguy E, Zhang S-Y, Chapgier A, Sancho-Shimizu V, Puel A, Picard C, Boisson-Dupuis S, Abel L, Casanova J-L. 2007. Human primary immunodeficiencies of type I interferons. Biochimie 89:878–883. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2007.04.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169. Armangue T, Baucells BJ, Vlagea A, Petit-Pedrol M, Esteve-Solé A, Deyà-Martínez A, Ruiz-García R, Juan M, Pérez de Diego R, Dalmau J, Alsina L. 2019. Toll-like receptor 3 deficiency in autoimmune encephalitis post-herpes simplex encephalitis. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 6:e611. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000611 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170. Alexopoulou L, Holt AC, Medzhitov R, Flavell RA. 2001. Recognition of double-stranded RNA and activation of NF-κB by Toll-like receptor 3. Nature 413:732–738. doi: 10.1038/35099560 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171. Reinert LS, Lopušná K, Winther H, Sun C, Thomsen MK, Nandakumar R, Mogensen TH, Meyer M, Vægter C, Nyengaard JR, Fitzgerald KA, Paludan SR. 2016. Sensing of HSV-1 by the cGAS-STING pathway in microglia orchestrates antiviral defence in the CNS. Nat Commun 7:13348. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172. Ishikawa H, Ma Z, Barber GN. 2009. STING regulates intracellular DNA-mediated, type I interferon-dependent innate immunity. Nature 461:788–792. doi: 10.1038/nature08476 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173. Patel S, Jin L. 2019. TMEM173 variants and potential importance to human biology and disease. Genes Immun 20:82–89. doi: 10.1038/s41435-018-0029-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174. Richter B, Sliter DA, Herhaus L, Stolz A, Wang C, Beli P, Zaffagnini G, Wild P, Martens S, Wagner SA, Youle RJ, Dikic I. 2016. Phosphorylation of OPTN by TBK1 enhances its binding to Ub chains and promotes selective autophagy of damaged mitochondria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:4039–4044. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1523926113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175. Li F, Xu D, Wang Y, Zhou Z, Liu J, Hu S, Gong Y, Yuan J, Pan L. 2018. Structural insights into the ubiquitin recognition by OPTN (optineurin) and its regulation by TBK1-mediated phosphorylation. Autophagy 14:66–79. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2017.1391970 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176. Lafont E, Draber P, Rieser E, Reichert M, Kupka S, de Miguel D, Draberova H, von Mässenhausen A, Bhamra A, Henderson S, Wojdyla K, Chalk A, Surinova S, Linkermann A, Walczak H. 2018. TBK1 and IKKε prevent TNF-induced cell death by RIPK1 phosphorylation. Nat Cell Biol 20:1389–1399. doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0229-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177. Xu D, Jin T, Zhu H, Chen H, Ofengeim D, Zou C, Mifflin L, Pan L, Amin P, Li W, Shan B, Naito MG, Meng H, Li Y, Pan H, Aron L, Adiconis X, Levin JZ, Yankner BA, Yuan J. 2018. TBK1 suppresses RIPK1-driven apoptosis and inflammation during development and in aging. Cell 174:1477–1491. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.07.041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178. Lamborn IT, Jing H, Zhang Y, Drutman SB, Abbott JK, Munir S, Bade S, Murdock HM, Santos CP, Brock LG, et al. 2017. Recurrent rhinovirus infections in a child with inherited MDA5 deficiency. J Exp Med 214:1949–1972. doi: 10.1084/jem.20161759 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from mBio are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES