Skip to main content
Journal of Anatomy logoLink to Journal of Anatomy
. 1977 Jul;123(Pt 3):615–635.

The growth patterns of three hindlimb muscles in the chicken.

C Helmi, J Cracraft
PMCID: PMC1234722  PMID: 885779

Abstract

This study was designed to investigate the growth patterns of three hindlimb muscles of the chicken relative to the functional-biomechanical demands of increasing body size. The biceps femoris, a bipennate non-postural muscle, grew relatively faster in terms of wet and dry weight than did the parallel-fibred adductor superficialis or the unipennate adductor profundus, both postural muscles. All three muscles exhibited positive allometry (relative to body weight) in muscle length but only biceps femoris and adductor profundus showed positive allometry in cross sectional area adductor superficialis having isometric growth in this parameter. In biceps femoris and adductor superficialis the lengths of the longest and shortest fasciculi grew at equal rates, whereas in adductor profundus the shortest fasciculi grew faster than the longest. We conclude that muscle weight alone is an insufficient indicator of changing function in growing muscle. Hence, growth studies should include other functionally relevant parameters such as cross sectional area, which is proportional to the force-producing capabilities of the muscle, or fibre (fasciculus) length, which is indicative of the absolute amount of stretching or shortening that is possible and of the contraction velocity.

Full text

PDF
615

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bryden M. M. Growth patterns of individual muscles of the elephant seal, Mirounga leonina (L.). J Anat. 1973 Oct;116(Pt 1):121–133. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. CHURCH L. E., JOHNSON L. C. GROWTH OF LONG BONES IN THE CHICKEN. RATES OF GROWTH IN LENGTH AND DIAMETER OF THE HUMERUS, TIBIA, AND METATARSUS. Am J Anat. 1964 May;114:521–538. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001140310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. CRAWFORD G. N. An experimental study of muscle growth in the rabbit. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1954 May;36-B(2):294–303. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.36B2.294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Davies A. S. Postnatal changes in the histochemical fibre types of procine skeletal muscle. J Anat. 1972 Nov;113(Pt 2):213–240. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gans C., Bock W. J. The functional significance of muscle architecture--a theoretical analysis. Ergeb Anat Entwicklungsgesch. 1965;38:115–142. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Goldberg A. L. Work-induced growth of skeletal muscle in normal and hypophysectomized rats. Am J Physiol. 1967 Nov;213(5):1193–1198. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1967.213.5.1193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gutmann E., Schiaffino S., Hanzliková V. Mechanism of compensatory hypertrophy in skeletal muscle of the rat. Exp Neurol. 1971 Jun;31(3):451–464. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(71)90248-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. James N. T. Compensatory hypertrophy in the extensor digitorum longus muscle of the rat. J Anat. 1973 Oct;116(Pt 1):57–65. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mackay B., Harrop T. J. An experimental study of the longitudinal growth of skeletal muscle in the rat. Acta Anat (Basel) 1969;72(1):38–49. doi: 10.1159/000143234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Müller W., Vogell L. Temporal progress of muscle adaptation to endurance training in hind limb muscles of young rats. A histochemical and morphometrical study. Cell Tissue Res. 1974;156(1):61–87. doi: 10.1007/BF00220102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rayne J., Crawford G. N. The growth of the muscles of mastication in the rat. J Anat. 1972 Dec;113(Pt 3):391–408. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rowe R. W., Goldspink G. Muscle fibre growth in five different muscles in both sexes of mice. J Anat. 1969 May;104(Pt 3):519–530. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. SCHWARTZ N. B. Changing size, composition, and contraction strength of gastrocnemius muscle. Am J Physiol. 1961 Jul;201:164–170. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1961.201.1.164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Williams P. E., Goldspink G. The effect of immobilization on the longitudinal growth of striated muscle fibres. J Anat. 1973 Oct;116(Pt 1):45–55. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Anatomy are provided here courtesy of Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland

RESOURCES