Skip to main content
PMC home page
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1995 Sep;222(3):256–262. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199509000-00004

Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. A prospective randomized comparison.

L C Martin 1, I Puente 1, J L Sosa 1, A Bassin 1, R Breslaw 1, M G McKenney 1, E Ginzburg 1, D Sleeman 1
PMCID: PMC1234801  PMID: 7677456

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors compare open and laparoscopic appendectomy in a randomized fashion with regard to length of operation, complications, hospital stay, and recovery time. METHODS: Adult patients (older than 14 years of age) with the diagnosis of acute appendicitis were randomized to either open or laparoscopic appendectomy over a 9-month period. All patients received preoperative antibiotics. The operative time was calculated as beginning with the incision and ending when the wound was fully closed. Patients that were converted from laparoscopic to open appendectomy were considered a separate group. Return to normal activity and work were determined by questioning during postoperative clinic, telephone, or mailed questionnaire. RESULTS: There was a total of 169 patients randomized, 88 to the open and 81 to the laparoscopic group. The groups were similar demographically. Of the 81 laparoscopic patients, 13 (16%) were converted to open. In the open group, 70 patients (79.5%) had acute appendicitis and 21 (23.9%) had perforative appendicitis. In the laparoscopic group, 62 patients (76.5%) had acute appendicitis and 10 (12.3%) had perforative appendicitis. There was no statistical difference in the return to activity or work between the laparoscopic and open groups. The operative time was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group (102.2 minutes vs. 81.7 minutes, p < 0.01). The hospital stay of 2.2 days in the laparoscopic group and 4.3 days in the open group was statistically (p = 0.007). There was no difference in the hospital stay for those with acute appendicitis (1.89 days vs. 2.61 days, p = 0.067) compared with those with a normal appendix but with pelvic inflammatory disease (1.1 days vs. 2.3 days, p = 0.11). There was a significant difference in patients with perforative appendicitis (1.5 days vs. 9.5 days, p < 0.01). The hospital cost for patients having laparoscopic appendectomy was $6077 and for an open appendectomy $7227 (p = 0.164). There were no increased complications associated with the laparoscopic technique. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic appendectomy is comparable to open appendectomy with regard to complications, hospital stay, cost, return to activity, and return to work. There was a greater operative time involved with the laparoscopic technique. Laparoscopic appendectomy does not offer any significant benefit over the open approach for the routine patient with appendicitis.

Full text

PDF
256

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. The Southern Surgeons Club. N Engl J Med. 1991 Apr 18;324(16):1073–1078. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199104183241601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Attwood S. E., Hill A. D., Murphy P. G., Thornton J., Stephens R. B. A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Surgery. 1992 Sep;112(3):497–501. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bonanni F., Reed J., 3rd, Hartzell G., Trostle D., Boorse R., Gittleman M., Cole A. Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 1994 Sep;179(3):273–278. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Daniell J. F., Gurley L. D., Kurtz B. R., Chambers J. F. The use of an automatic stapling device for laparoscopic appendectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Oct;78(4):721–723. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Deutsch A. A., Zelikovsky A., Reiss R. Laparoscopy in the prevention of unnecessary appendicectomies: a prospective study. Br J Surg. 1982 Jun;69(6):336–337. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800690615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dunn E. L., Moore E. E., Elerding S. C., Murphy J. R. The unnecessary laparotomy for appendicitis-can it be decreased? Am Surg. 1982 Jul;48(7):320–323. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Frazee R. C., Roberts J. W., Symmonds R. E., Snyder S. K., Hendricks J. C., Smith R. W., Custer M. D., 3rd, Harrison J. B. A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg. 1994 Jun;219(6):725–731. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199406000-00017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gangal H. T., Gangal M. H. Laparoscopic appendicectomy. Endoscopy. 1987 May;19(3):127–129. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1018257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Leape L. L., Ramenofsky M. L. Laparoscopy for questionable appendicitis: can it reduce the negative appendectomy rate? Ann Surg. 1980 Apr;191(4):410–413. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198004000-00004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Nakhgevany K. B., Clarke L. E. Acute appendicitis in women of childbearing age. Arch Surg. 1986 Sep;121(9):1053–1055. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1986.01400090083014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nowzaradan Y., Westmoreland J., McCarver C. T., Harris R. J. Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: indications and current use. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1991 Oct;1(5):247–257. doi: 10.1089/lps.1991.1.247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ortega A. E., Hunter J. G., Peters J. H., Swanstrom L. L., Schirmer B. A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group. Am J Surg. 1995 Feb;169(2):208–213. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)80138-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pier A., Götz F., Bacher C. Laparoscopic appendectomy in 625 cases: from innovation to routine. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991 Mar;1(1):8–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Richards W., Watson D., Lynch G., Reed G. W., Olsen D., Spaw A., Holcomb W., Frexes-Steed M., Goldstein R., Sharp K. A review of the results of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993 Nov;177(5):473–480. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Saye W. B., Rives D. A., Cochran E. B. Laparoscopic appendectomy: three years' experience. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991 Jun;1(2):109–115. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Schirmer B. D., Schmieg R. E., Jr, Dix J., Edge S. B., Hanks J. B. Laparoscopic versus traditional appendectomy for suspected appendicitis. Am J Surg. 1993 Jun;165(6):670–675. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80785-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Scott-Conner C. E., Hall T. J., Anglin B. L., Muakkassa F. F. Laparoscopic appendectomy. Initial experience in a teaching program. Ann Surg. 1992 Jun;215(6):660–668. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199206000-00013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Semm K. Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy. 1983 Mar;15(2):59–64. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1021466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Soper N. J., Barteau J. A., Clayman R. V., Ashley S. W., Dunnegan D. L. Comparison of early postoperative results for laparoscopic versus standard open cholecystectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992 Feb;174(2):114–118. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sosa J. L., Sleeman D., McKenney M. G., Dygert J., Yarish D., Martin L. A comparison of laparoscopic and traditional appendectomy. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1993 Apr;3(2):129–131. doi: 10.1089/lps.1993.3.129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Spirtos N. M., Eisenkop S. M., Spirtos T. W., Poliakin R. I., Hibbard L. T. Laparoscopy--a diagnostic aid in cases of suspected appendicitis. Its use in women of reproductive age. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Jan;156(1):90–94. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(87)90212-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Stoker M. E., Vose J., O'Mara P., Maini B. S. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A clinical and financial analysis of 280 operations. Arch Surg. 1992 May;127(5):589–595. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1992.01420050117015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Vallina V. L., Velasco J. M., McCulloch C. S. Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Ann Surg. 1993 Nov;218(5):685–692. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199321850-00016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Whitworth C. M., Whitworth P. W., Sanfillipo J., Polk H. C., Jr Value of diagnostic laparoscopy in young women with possible appendicitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1988 Sep;167(3):187–190. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES