Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1995 Feb;221(2):149–155. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199502000-00004

Laparoscopic antegrade sphincterotomy. A new technique for the management of complex choledocholithiasis.

M J Curet 1, D E Pitcher 1, D T Martin 1, K A Zucker 1
PMCID: PMC1234947  PMID: 7857142

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic antegrade sphincterotomy represents a new technique that expands the ability of the surgeon to manage complex choledocholithiasis at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The authors describe their experience with six patients with cholelithiasis and complex common bile duct stone disease who underwent successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy and antegrade sphincterotomies. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Patients with complex choledocholithiasis have represented a technical challenge to the minimally invasive surgeon. Recently, a laparoscopic technique of antegrade biliary sphincterotomy has been reported by DePaulo in Brazil. This technique has been successful at clearing the common bile duct at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: Laparoscopic antegrade sphincterotomy was performed in six patients with multiple common bile duct stones. A standard endoscopic sphincterotome was introduced antegrade via the cystic duct or common bile duct and guided through the ampulla. A side-viewing duodenoscope was used to confirm proper positioning of the sphincterotome. Then a blended current was applied until the sphincterotomy was complete. RESULTS: There was no mortality or morbidity associated with laparoscopic antegrade sphincterotomy. The mean additional operative time to complete laparoscopic antegrade sphincterotomy was 19 minutes. Three of the six patients were noted to have transient, asymptomatic elevation in serum amylase levels immediately after surgery (average 252 international units/L; normal < 115), which normalized within 72 hours. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 2.9 days. At a mean follow-up of 5 months (range 1 to 10 months), five patients remain asymptomatic. One individual with acquired immune deficiency syndrome had persistent symptoms, and a diagnosis of cytomegalovirus pancreatitis was eventually made. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic antegrade sphincterotomy appears to be a safe and effective technique for the management of complex biliary tract disease.

Full text

PDF
149

Images in this article

150Figure 1.
on p.150
151Figure 2.
on p.151
153Figure 4.,Figure 5.,Figure 6.
on p.153

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Benhamou Y., Caumes E., Gerosa Y., Cadranel J. F., Dohin E., Katlama C., Amouyal P., Canard J. M., Azar N., Hoang C. AIDS-related cholangiopathy. Critical analysis of a prospective series of 26 patients. Dig Dis Sci. 1993 Jun;38(6):1113–1118. doi: 10.1007/BF01295729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cotton P. B. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1993 Apr;165(4):474–478. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80944-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cotton P. B., Lehman G., Vennes J., Geenen J. E., Russell R. C., Meyers W. C., Liguory C., Nickl N. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991 May-Jun;37(3):383–393. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(91)70740-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cotton P. B. Non-operative removal of bile duct stones by duodenoscopic sphincterotomy. Br J Surg. 1980 Jan;67(1):1–5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800670102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DePaula A. L., Hashiba K., Bafutto M., Zago R., Machado M. M. Laparoscopic antegrade sphincterotomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1993 Jun;3(3):157–160. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Flowers J. L., Zucker K. A., Graham S. M., Scovill W. A., Imbembo A. L., Bailey R. W. Laparoscopic cholangiography. Results and indications. Ann Surg. 1992 Mar;215(3):209–216. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199203000-00004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gerber A., Apt M. K. The case against routine operative cholangiography. Am J Surg. 1982 Jun;143(6):734–736. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(82)90048-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hunter J. G. Laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration. Am J Surg. 1992 Jan;163(1):53–58. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(92)90252-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Leese T., Neoptolemos J. P., Carr-Locke D. L. Successes, failures, early complications and their management following endoscopic sphincterotomy: results in 394 consecutive patients from a single centre. Br J Surg. 1985 Mar;72(3):215–219. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800720325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Morris J. B., Margolis R., Rosato E. F. Safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy without intraoperative cholangiography. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1993 Feb;3(1):17–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Petelin J. B. Laparoscopic approach to common duct pathology. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991 Mar;1(1):33–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Petelin J. B. Laparoscopic approach to common duct pathology. Am J Surg. 1993 Apr;165(4):487–491. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80947-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pitcher D. E., Martin D. T., Zucker K. A. Laparoscopic and endoscopic management of common bile duct stones. Curr Opin Gen Surg. 1994:203–207. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Reiter J. J., Bayer H. P., Mennicken C., Manegold B. C. Results of endoscopic papillotomy: a collective experience from nine endoscopic centers in West Germany. World J Surg. 1978 Jul;2(4):505–511. doi: 10.1007/BF01563686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Schirmer B. D., Edge S. B., Dix J., Hyser M. J., Hanks J. B., Jones R. S. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Treatment of choice for symptomatic cholelithiasis. Ann Surg. 1991 Jun;213(6):665–677. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199106000-00018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Stiegmann G. V., Goff J. S., Mansour A., Pearlman N., Reveille R. M., Norton L. Precholecystectomy endoscopic cholangiography and stone removal is not superior to cholecystectomy, cholangiography, and common duct exploration. Am J Surg. 1992 Feb;163(2):227–230. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(92)90106-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Traverso L. W., Kozarek R. A., Ball T. J., Brandabur J. J., Hunter J. A., Jolly P. C., Patterson D. J., Ryan J. A., Thirlby R. C., Wechter D. G. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1993 May;165(5):581–586. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80439-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Van Stiegmann G., Pearlman N. W., Goff J. S., Sun J. H., Norton L. W. Endoscopic cholangiography and stone removal prior to cholecystectomy. A more cost-effective approach than operative duct exploration? Arch Surg. 1989 Jul;124(7):787–790. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1989.01410070037008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES