Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2025 Aug 13;20(8):e0328760. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328760

Is waist to height ratio better at assessing cause-specific mortality risk than body mass index or waist circumference? A prospective analysis in a large U.S.-based cohort

Alpa V Patel 1,*, Kierstin Faw 1, Erika Rees-Punia 1, Brad Heltemes 2, Clara Bodelon 1, Anita Peoples 1, Lauren E McCullough 1,3, Lauren R Teras 1
Editor: Neftali Eduardo Antonio-Villa4
PMCID: PMC12349718  PMID: 40802716

Abstract

Introduction

Excess body fatness is an established risk factor for various types of chronic disease and all-cause mortality. Most previous studies are based on body mass index (BMI) as a general measure of adiposity, but whether measures of central adiposity that better represent metabolically active visceral fat, such as waist-to-height ratio (WtHR), may be better at predicting disease and mortality risks is less known.

Materials and Methods

Data from a large, prospective cohort in the U.S. including 50,618 women and 43,783 men (mean age of 67.3 years, predominantly non-Hispanic White), among whom 21,565 women and 26,758 men died during follow-up (1997–2018), were used to calculate multivariable-adjusted hazard rate ratios and 95% CIs for WtHR, BMI, and waist circumference in relation to total and cause-specific mortality.

Results

WtHR was strongly correlated with BMI (r = 0.81). After adjustment for BMI and other covariates, WtHR (≥0.55 vs. < 0.50) was positively associated with all-cause mortality risk in women (RR = 1.23, 95% CI 1.17–1.29) and men (RR = 1.11, 95% CI 1.06–1.17). BMI and WC were also independently, positively associated with subsequent mortality risk at a similar magnitude to WtHR. Associations persisted for all grouped causes of death in women and men, with the exception of cancer and Alzheimer’s disease mortality in men. Mortality associations with WtHR were generally stronger among individuals younger than age 70 years compared to older individuals.

Discussion

WtHR was associated with all-cause, cardiovascular disease, cancer, respiratory disease, and Alzheimer’s disease mortality in women and men at a magnitude similar to BMI or WC. Excess adiposity is an established major risk factor for premature death, but different measures may better predict mortality in different populations defined by age or other factors.

Introduction

Excess body fatness is an established risk factor for premature mortality and for several chronic diseases including cardiovascular disease, type II diabetes, and at least 13 types of cancer [13]. Most studies have relied on body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) to estimate excess body fatness due to ease of measurement, ability to compare across different study populations, and its strong correlation to various aspects of excess body fatness (r > 0.7) [4]. However, whether other measures of excess body fatness that focus more on central adiposity, such as waist circumference (WC) or waist to height ratio (WtHR), may better measure visceral fat and therefore be more predictive of future disease risk is unclear [5].

Many previous studies of abdominal adiposity have focused on WC and most have shown that WC predicts mortality risk, with and without adjusting for BMI. In the largest study to date [6], mortality risk increased by 7% per 5 cm increase in waist circumference among men and by 9% per 5 cm increase among women. Given WC does not account for differences in height, more recent studies have begun examining WtHR as another potential measure of excess adiposity [7]. Though limited, studies to date have reported WtHR associations with mortality and cardiometabolic risk, often with better discriminatory power than BMI or WC [79]. Individual studies have been relatively small, but in a recent meta-analysis [10] including 20 studies, all-cause mortality increased by 16% when examining WtHR continuously (per 1 standard deviation). Furthermore, studies have suggested that keeping waist circumference to less than half of one’s height is associated with additional years of life [8] and leading the European Association for the Study of Obesity to recommend the use of WtHR > 0.5 as part of the diagnosis and treatment planning of obesity [11].

While WtHR has been gaining attention in the scientific community as a potentially better predictor of overall chronic disease risk compared to BMI or WC, the studies to date are relatively small and insufficient to draw conclusions, particularly for cause-specific mortality. Thus, we examined associations between WtHR, WC, and BMI in relation to all-cause mortality as well as grouped causes of mortality that are among the most common causes of death including cardiovascular disease, cancer, respiratory diseases, and Alzheimer’s disease/dementia in a large prospective cohort of US men and women.

Materials and methods

Men and women in this analysis were drawn from the 184,190 participants in the CPS-II Nutrition Cohort, a prospective study of cancer incidence and mortality established by the American Cancer Society in 1992 as a subgroup of the larger 1982 CPS-II baseline mortality cohort [12]. Most participants were age 50–74 years at enrollment in 1992. At baseline, they completed a ten-page, self-administered, mailed questionnaire that included questions on demographic, medical, behavioral, environmental, and dietary factors. Beginning in 1997, follow-up questionnaires were sent to cohort members every two years to update exposure information and to ascertain newly diagnosed cancers. All follow-up questionnaire response rates (after multiple mailings) among living cohort members were at least 88%. End of mortality follow-up for the present analysis was December 31, 2018. All aspects of CPS-II have been reviewed and approved by the Emory University Institutional Review Board.

For this analysis, participants were eligible for inclusion if they returned the 1997 follow-up survey when waist circumference was measured (n = 160,300). We subsequently excluded participants with missing waist circumference or BMI (n = 26,813), underweight BMI < 18.5 kg/m2 (n = 1,222), top/bottom 0.1% of waist circumference or BMI (n = 397), missing smoking status (n = 1,714), and history of cancer or emphysema at study entry in 1997 (n = 35,753). Underweight was excluded because there were too few individuals in this group and their low BMI may be due to underlying illness. Top/bottom 0.1% of WC and BMI were excluded because these extremes were deemed likely implausible values. After exclusions, the final analytic cohort consisted of 50,618 women and 43,783 men with a mean age of 67.3 years (± 6.2 SD) at the start of this study in 1997.

The primary endpoint was death from any cause occurring between the 1997 survey return date and December 31, 2018. Deaths were identified through biennial automated linkage of the entire cohort with the National Death Index [13]. Death certificates or codes for cause of death have been obtained for 98.7% of all known deaths. Causes of death were classified by using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), Tenth Revision [14]. Specific primary causes of death were grouped into 5 broad categories: cardiovascular disease (codes I00–I99); cancer (codes C00–C76 and C80–C97); respiratory diseases (codes J00-J999); Alzheimer’s disease and dementia (codes F00-F059, G30-G309); and all other causes combined. Grouped causes of death were examined if an adequate number of deaths were available for analysis. There were 48,323 deaths from all causes (21,565 in women, 26,758 in men) that occurred by the end of follow-up.

BMI (weight in kg/height in m2) at baseline in 1997 was calculated using self-reported weight and height and categorized as follows: 18.5- < 22.0, 22.0- < 25.0 (reference), 25.0- < 27.5, 27.5- < 30, and ≥ 30.0 kg/m2. Participants were sent a tape measure and asked to measure their waist circumference (just above the navel for women and at the navel for men) in inches (in.), round down to the nearest quarter of an inch, and record the measurement on their survey. Waist circumference was categorized as <30.25, 30.25- < 33.50, 33.50- < 37.00, and ≥ 37.00 inches for women and <36.00, 36.00- < 38.25, 38.25- < 41.25, and ≥41.25 inches for men. WtHR was calculated as waist circumference (in.) divided by height (in.) and categorized as <0.50 (reference), 0.50- < 0.55, and ≥0.55, consistent with the European Association for the Study of Obesity recommendation [11].

Multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to compute hazard ratios (HR) corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations between various measures of excess body fatness (WtHR, BMI and WC) and mortality outcomes (all-cause, cardiovascular disease, cancer, respiratory diseases, Alzheimer’s disease/dementia, and all other causes combined) in men and women separately. Person-years of follow-up for each participant were computed as the time from the 1997 survey return date to date of death or end of follow-up on December 31, 2018, whichever came first. For each specific exposure variable, risk was assessed in 3 models: [1] adjusted for age only (single year) and [2] additionally adjusted for other potential confounders found to be relevant in previous CPS-II studies of obesity including: smoking (status and time since quitting among former smokers), physical activity MET-hours per week, diet score based on American Cancer Society dietary guidelines [15], alcohol intake, and pre-existing comorbidities score (includes type II diabetes, hypertension, high cholesterol, and cardiovascular disease; coded as 0, 1, 2+), and 3) additionally adjusted for BMI in WC and WtHR. Models among women were also adjusted for age at menopausal status, postmenopausal hormone use (PMH), and parity.

A stratified analysis by age (<70, ≥ 70 years) and a sensitivity analysis restricted to lifelong nonsmokers were also conducted. Finally, an analysis reexamining WtHR using sex-specific quartiles instead of the pre-defined cutpoints to allow for the differences in the distribution of WtHR values by sex. Statistical Analysis Software (SAS) Studio Version 9.4 was used for all analyses, and analyses were performed using de-identified data between March 1, 2023- November 1, 2024.

Results

Among women, the mean BMI was 25.8 kg/m2 (SD ± 4.6), mean waist circumference was 34.1 in (SD ± 5.0) and mean WtHR was 0.53 (SD ± 0.08). Among men, the mean BMI was 26.5 kg/m2 (SD ± 3.7), mean waist circumference was 38.9 in (SD ± 3.9) and mean WtHR was 0.55 (SD ± 0.05). WtHR was strongly correlated with BMI (r = 0.81). Men and women with greater excess body fatness according to WtHR had a greater number of comorbidities, engaged in less moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, were less likely to consume any alcohol, and had a lower overall diet quality score (Table 1).

Table 1. Select baseline participant characteristics by categories of waist-to-height ratio among women and men in the Cancer Prevention Study-II Nutrition Cohort, 1997.

Wasit to Height Ratio
Women Men
Characteristic < 0.50
(N = 19,811)
0.50- < 0.55
(N = 12,971)
≥ 0.55
(N = 17,836)
< 0.50
(N = 5,925)
0.50- < 0.55
(N = 17,113)
≥0.55
(N = 20,745)
Comorbidity Score, N (%)
 0 8,373 (42.3) 3,823 (29.5) 3,774 (21.2) 2,237 (37.8) 4,990 (29.2) 4,638 (22.4)
 1 7,672 (38.7) 5,306 (40.9) 6,695 (37.5) 2,071 (34.9) 6,001 (35.1) 7,029 (33.9)
 2+ 3,766 (19.0) 3,842 (29.6) 7,367 (41.3) 1,617 (27.3) 6,122 (35.8) 9,078 (43.8)
BMI (kg/m 2 ), N (%)
 18.5 – < 22.0 9,444 (47.7) 1,030 (7.9) 174 (1.0) 2,247 (37.9) 989 (5.8) 88 (0.4)
 22.0 – < 25.0 7,997 (40.4) 5,005 (38.6) 1,681 (9.4) 3,090 (52.1) 7,547 (44.1) 1,664 (8.0)
 25.0 – < 27.5 2,017 (10.2) 4,748 (36.6) 4,103 (23.0) 550 (9.3) 6,725 (39.3) 6,295 (30.3)
 27.5 – < 30 280 (1.4) 1,562 (12.0) 4,193 (23.5) 31 (0.5) 1,600 (9.3) 6,205 (29.9)
 30+ 73 (0.4) 626 (4.8) 7,685 (43.1) 7 (0.1) 252 (1.5) 6,493 (31.3)
Physical Activity (Mets/Week), N (%)
 None 760 (3.8) 685 (5.3) 1,629 (9.1) 282 (4.8) 923 (5.4) 1,949 (9.4)
 0- < 7.5 6,300 (31.8) 4,963 (38.3) 7,805 (43.8) 1,457 (24.6) 4,981 (29.1) 7,708 (37.2)
 7.5+ 12,504 (63.1) 7,092 (54.78) 8,010 (44.9) 4,067 (68.6) 10,834 (63.3) 10,512 (50.7)
 Unknown 247 (1.2) 231 (1.8) 392 (2.2) 119 (2.0) 375 (2.2) 576 (2.8)
Smoking Status, N (%)
 Never Smoker 11,146 (56.3) 7,358 (56.7) 10,354 (58.0) 2,540 (42.9) 6,231 (36.4) 6,455 (31.1)
 Former Smoker, quit less than 20 years ago 2,674 (13.5) 1,975 (15.2) 3,008 (16.9) 789 (13.3) 3,043 (17.8) 4,824 (23.2)
 Former Smoker, quit 20- < 30 years ago 1,833 (9.2) 1,119 (8.6) 1,530 (8.6) 704 (11.9) 2,419 (14.1) 3,483 (16.8)
 Former Smoker, quit 30 + years ago 3,118 (15.7) 1,854 (14.3) 2,189 (12.3) 1,501 (25.3) 4,635 (27.1) 5,120 (24.7)
 Current Smoker, < 40 years duration 375 (1.9) 213 (1.6) 239 (1.3) 76 (1.3) 158 (0.9) 168 (0.8)
 Current Smoker, ≥ 40 years duration 665 (3.4) 452 (3.5) 516 (2.9) 315 (5.3) 627 (3.7) 695 (3.3)
Alcohol Intake, N (%)
 Not current or <1 drink per week 11,361 (57.3) 8,420 (64.9) 13,435 (75.3) 2,798 (47.2) 8,274 (48.3) 10,999 (53.0)
 1-6 Drinks per week 6,219 (31.4) 3,270 (25.2) 3,131 (17.5) 1,930 (32.6) 5,315 (31.1) 5,537 (26.7)
 1 + Drink per day 2,231 (11.3) 1,281 (9.9) 1,270 (7.1) 1,197 (20.2) 3,524 (20.6) 4,209 (20.3)
Waist to Height Ratio
Women Men
< 0.50 0.50- < 0.55 ≥ 0.55 < 0.50 0.50- < 0.55 ≥0.55
ACS Diet Score, N (%)
 0-2 3,580 (18.1) 2,949 (22.7) 5,021 (28.1) 950 (16.0) 3,153 (18.4) 5,046 (24.3)
 3-5 8,921 (45.0) 5,906 (45.5) 7,931 (44.5) 2,350 (39.7) 7,460 (43.6) 9,200 (44.3)
 6-9 5,993 (30.2) 3,215 (24.8) 3,418 (19.2) 2,171 (36.6) 5,182 (30.3) 4,712 (22.7)
 Missing 1,317 (6.6) 901 (6.9) 1,466 (8.2) 454 (7.7) 1,318 (7.7) 1,787 (8.6)
Age at Interview (1997), Mean (SD) 65.75 (6.3) 66.76 (6.3) 66.96 (6.3) 67.86 (5.9) 68.35 (5.8) 68.43 (5.7)
Waist Circumference (in), Mean (SD) 29.56 (2.0) 33.73 (1.6) 39.35 (3.6) 33.96 (1.6) 36.92 (1.6) 41.84 (3.2)

After adjustment for BMI and other covariates, WtHR was positively associated with all-cause mortality risk in women (≥0.55 vs. < 0.50 RR = 1.23, 95% CI 1.17–1.29) and men (RR = 1.11, 95% CI 1.06–1.17) (Table 2 and 3, respectively). Multivariable-adjusted relative risks were positively associated with all grouped causes of death in women with similar magnitude of association for all causes of death examined (Table 2). In men, WtHR was positively associated with all causes of mortality except cancer and Alzheimer’s disease (Table 3). BMI and WC were also independently, positively associated with subsequent mortality risk at a similar magnitude to WtHR (S1–S2 Tables in S1 File). In women and men, BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 was associated with 22% higher risk of total mortality compared to normal weight (BMI 22- < 25 kg/m2), and positive associations were seen for all grouped causes of death other than Alzheimer’s disease. WC was also positively associated with total mortality and cause-specific mortality other than Alzheimer’s disease in both women and men at a magnitude similar to that of BMI and WtHR.

Table 2. Multivariable adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between waist to height ratio and mortality, women.

Waist to Height Ratio
< 0.50 0.50 – < 0.55 ≥0.55
All Cause Death
 Deaths/ Total person-years 7,354/104,509 5,382/75,711 8,829/121,189
 Age-adjusted, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 1.03
(1.00, 1.07)
1.31
(1.27, 1.35)
 Multivariate adjusted1, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 0.96
(0.93, 1.00)
1.12
(1.09, 1.16)
 Multivariate adjusted plus BMI, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 1.05
(1.01, 1.10)
1.23
(1.17, 1.29)
Cancer
 Deaths/ Total person-years 1,746/21,812 1,227/14,951 1,963/23,319
 Age-adjusted, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 1.05
(0.97, 1.12)
1.28
(1.20, 1.36)
 Multivariate adjusted1, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 1.02
(0.95, 1.10)
1.22
(1.14, 1.31)
 Multivariate adjusted plus BMI, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 1.04
(0.96, 1.14)
1.21
(1.10, 1.34)
Cardiovascular Disease
 Deaths/ Total person-years 2,363/33,983 1,864/26,420 3,171/44,123
 Age-adjusted, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 1.08
(1.02, 1.15)
1.42
(1.35, 1.50)
 Multivariate adjusted1, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 0.97
(0.92, 1.04)
1.14
(1.07, 1.20)
 Multivariate adjusted plus BMI, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 1.06
(0.99, 1.13)
1.21
(1.11, 1.31)
Coronary Heart Disease
 Deaths/Total person-years
 Age-adjusted, HR (95% CI) 783/10,764 682/9,170 1,226/16,239
 Multivariate adjusted1, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 1.19
(1.08, 1.32)
1.65
(1.51, 1.80)
 Multivariate adjusted plus BMI, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 1.04
(0.94, 1.16)
1.24
(1.12, 1.36)
Stroke
 Deaths/ Total person-years 1.00 (Referent) 1.13
(1.01, 1.27)
1.36
(1.19, 1.55)
 Age-adjusted, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 1.03
(0.91, 1.16)
1.09
(0.98, 1.21)
 Multivariate adjusted1, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 0.95
(0.85, 1.07)
0.93
(0.83, 1.04)
 Multivariate adjusted plus BMI, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 1.09
(0.95, 1.25)
1.17
(0.99, 1.37)
Respiratory Disease
 Deaths/ Total person-years 594/8,773 415/6,171 697/9,910
 Age-adjusted, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 0.98
(0.86, 1.11)
1.28
(1.14, 1.43)
 Multivariate adjusted1, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 0.90
(0.79, 1.02)
1.08
(0.96, 1.21)
 Multivariate adjusted plus BMI, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 1.03
(0.89, 1.19)
1.18
(1.00, 1.40)
Alzheimer’s Disease and Dementia
 Deaths/Total person-years 1,283/20,455 825/13,217 1,093/17,738
 Age-adjusted, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 0.88
(0.81, 0.96)
0.91
(0.84, 0.99)
 Multivariate adjusted1, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 0.86
(0.79, 0.94)
0.87
(0.79, 0.94)
 Multivariate adjusted plus BMI, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 1.02
(0.92, 1.13)
1.18
(1.04, 1.33)
All Other Causes Combined
 Deaths/ Total person-years 1,368/19,486 1,051/14,952 1,905/26,099
 Age-adjusted, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 1.09
(1.01, 1.19)
1.53
(1.43, 1.64)
 Multivariate adjusted1, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 1.00
(0.92, 1.08)
1.25
(1.16, 1.34)
 Multivariate adjusted plus BMI, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 1.11
(1.01, 1.22)
1.36
(1.22, 1.51)

1Multivariate adjusted w/o BMI is adjusted for age, parity, PMH use and kind, ACS diet score, alcohol intake, smoking status, physical activity, comorbidity score, and age at menopause.

Table 3. Multivariable adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between waist to height ratio and mortality, men.

Waist to Height Ratio
< 0.50 0.50 – < 0.55 ≥0.55
All Cause Death
 Deaths/ Total person-years 3,305/41,318 9,953/126,692 13,500/169,107
 Age-adjusted, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 1.00 (0.96, 1.04) 1.21 (1.16, 1.25)
 Multivariate adjusted1, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 0.94 (0.90, 0.98) 1.04 (1.00, 1.08)
 Multivariate adjusted plus BMI, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 1.02 (0.98, 1.07) 1.11 (1.05, 1.17)
Cancer
 Deaths/ Total person-years 802/9,580 2,426/28,852 3,114/36,220
 Age-adjusted, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 1.02 (0.94, 1.10) 1.15 (1.06, 1.24)
 Multivariate adjusted1, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 0.98 (0.91, 1.06) 1.05 (0.97, 1.14)
 Multivariate adjusted plus BMI, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 0.95 (0.87, 1.04) 0.94 (0.85, 1.04)
Cardiovascular Disease
 Deaths/ Total person-years 1,140/13,776 3,651/45,369 5,335/65,072
 Age-adjusted, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 1.06 (0.99, 1.13) 1.38 (1.29, 1.47)
 Multivariate adjusted1, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 0.96 (0.90, 1.03) 1.13 (1.05, 1.20)
 Multivariate adjusted plus BMI, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 1.04 (0.97, 1.13) 1.17 (1.07, 1.28)
Coronary Heart Disease
 Deaths/ Total person-years 566/6,210 1,829/21,520 2,818/32,583
 Age-adjusted, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 1.06 (0.97, 1.17) 1.45 (1.32, 1.59)
 Multivariate adjusted1, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 0.95 (0.86, 1.04) 1.14 (1.04, 1.25)
 Multivariate adjusted plus BMI, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 1.08 (0.97, 1.20) 1.29 (1.14, 1.46)
Stroke
 Deaths/ Total person-years 188/2,385 613/7,572 776/9,415
 Age-adjusted, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 1.08 (0.91, 1.27) 1.22 (1.04, 1.43)
 Multivariate adjusted1, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 1.03 (0.87, 1.21) 1.08 (0.92, 1.27)
 Multivariate adjusted plus BMI, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 1.10 (0.91, 1.32) 1.17 (0.95, 1.45)
Respiratory Disease
 Deaths/ Total person-years 302/4,007 812/10,922 1,111/14,822
 Age-adjusted, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 0.89 (0.78, 1.01) 1.08 (0.95, 1.23)
 Multivariate adjusted1, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 0.83 (0.73, 0.95) 0.90 (0.79, 1.03)
 Multivariate adjusted plus BMI, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 1.01 (0.87, 1.18) 1.15 (0.96, 1.37)
Alzheimer’s Disease and Dementia
 Deaths/ Total person-years 376/5,457 995/14,853 1,064/16,299
 Age-adjusted, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 0.87 (0.77, 0.98) 0.85 (0.75, 0.96)
 Multivariate adjusted1, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 0.85 (0.75, 0.96) 0.80 (0.71, 0.90)
 Multivariate adjusted plus BMI, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 1.03 (0.90, 1.18) 1.08 (0.92, 1.27)
All Other Causes Combined
 Deaths/ Total person-years 685/8,498 2,069/26,696 2,876/36,695
 Age-adjusted, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 1.01 (0.92, 1.10) 1.25 (1.15, 1.36)
 Multivariate adjusted1, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 0.95 (0.87, 1.03) 1.07 (0.98, 1.16)
 Multivariate adjusted plus BMI, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 1.08 (0.98, 1.19) 1.21 (1.08, 1.36)

1Multivariate adjusted without BMI is adjusted for age, ACS diet score, alcohol intake, smoking status, physical activity, and comorbidity score.

In both women and men, associations between WtHR and overall and cause-specific mortality outcomes were largely unchanged when restricted to lifelong nonsmokers whereas associations with BMI and WC became stronger for cancer and respiratory disease mortality among nonsmokers (Table 4). In analyses stratified by age (<70, ≥ 70 years), associations for all mortality outcomes were modestly stronger for younger women compared to older women (all-cause <70 years RR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.20–1.39 vs. ≥ 70 years RR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.07–1.23, p-interaction <0.01) (S3 Table). On the contrary, the magnitude of associations with WtHR and mortality appeared slightly stronger among older men (<70 years RR = 1.03, 95% CI 0.95–1.12 vs. ≥ 70 years RR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.07–1.23, p-interaction = 0.38), and associations for cardiovascular disease and respiratory disease mortality among younger men were no longer statistically significant (S4 Table). S5–6 Tables show associations between sex-specific quartiles of WtHR and mortality risks. When using sex-specific quartiles, associations between the lowest and highest quartiles are more pronounced than when using pre-defined cutpoints, particularly among women. Finally, to address the potential for reverse causation, we examined associations excluding the first two years of follow-up and tested for an interaction with follow-up time, and results remained unchanged (data not shown).

Table 4. Multivariable adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between waist to height ratio and mortality among non-smokers for women and men.

Waist to Height Ratio for Life-Long Non-Smokers
Women Men
< 0.50 0.50 – 0.55 ≥0.55 < 0.50 0.50 – 0.55 ≥0.55
All Cause Death
 Number of Deaths 4,007 2,969 4,956 1,234 3,235 3,893
 Multivariate Adjusted, Model, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 1.07 (1.01, 1.13) 1.24 (1.16, 1.32) 1.00 (Referent) 1.05 (0.97, 1.13) 1.14 (1.04, 1.24)
Cancer Death
 Number of Deaths 823 591 958 255 653 760
 Multivariate Adjusted Model, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 1.09 (0.96, 1.23) 1.20 (1.04, 1.39) 1.00 (Referent) 0.94 (0.80, 1.11) 0.95 (0.78, 1.16)
CVD Death
 Number of Deaths 1,385 1,095 1,831 454 1,257 1,599
 Multivariate Adjusted, Model, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 1.05 (0.96, 1.15) 1.19 (1.07, 1.32) 1.00 (Referent) 1.09 (0.96, 1.23) 1.18 (1.02, 1.36)
 CHD Death
  Number of Deaths 466 382 684 214 601 801
  Multivariate Adjusted, Model, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 1.05 (0.90, 1.22) 1.27 (1.07, 1.52) 1.00 (Referent) 1.18 (0.99, 1.40) 1.35 (1.10, 1.66)
   Model, HR (95% CI)
 Stroke Death
  Number of Deaths 375 309 408 81 229 243
  Multivariate Adjusted, Model, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 1.16 (0.98, 1.38) 1.18 (0.96, 1.46) 1.00 (Referent) 1.07 (0.80, 1.43) 1.03 (0.73, 1.45)
Respiratory Death
  Number of Deaths 259 192 354 71 211 258
  Multivariate Adjusted, Model, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 1.07 (0.86, 1.33) 1.31 (1.02, 1.67) 1.00 (Referent) 1.23 (0.91, 1.67) 1.29 (0.90, 1.85)
Alzheimer’s Disease and Dementia Death
   Number of Deaths 759 499 681 165 352 357
   Multivariate Adjusted, Model, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 1.05 (0.92, 1.19) 1.20 (1.03, 1.40) 1.00 (Referent) 0.98 (0.79, 1.22) 1.08 (0.83, 1.40)
All Other Cause Death
   Number of Deaths 781 592 1,132 289 762 919
  Multivariate Adjusted, Model, HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Referent) 1.10 (0.98, 1.25) 1.37 (1.19, 1.58) 1.00 (Referent) 1.07 (0.92, 1.25) 1.24 (1.03, 1.49)

*Women’s models are adjusted for age, parity, PMH use and kind, ACS diet score, alcohol intake, physical activity, comorbidity score, age at menopause, and BMI.

*Men’s models are adjusted for age, ACS diet score, alcohol intake, physical activity, comorbidity score, and BMI.

Discussion

In this study, the largest to date, WtHR was associated with all-cause, cardiovascular disease, cancer, respiratory disease, and Alzheimer’s disease mortality in women and all causes except cancer and Alzheimer’s disease mortality in men at a magnitude similar to BMI or WC. Associations remained largely unchanged after adjustment for BMI further supporting that central adiposity is independently associated with mortality risk. These findings are largely consistent with some, but not all, previous studies.

In a previous study including 21,109 participants using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), WtHR was associated with incidence of hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes, but was only associated with cardiovascular disease, cancer, and all-cause mortality among women aged ≥ 65 years [16]. In contrast, in a British study including 7,414 women and men, WtHR was a better predictor of subsequent mortality and a greater number of years of life lost than BMI [8]. In that study, authors concluded “Keep your waist circumference to less than half your height.” A recent meta-analysis including 17 studies that included 74,520 total participants found that WtHR similarly predicted hypertension, dyslipidemia, and hyperglycemia compared to BMI and WC [17]. Another recent meta-analysis reported 16% higher mortality risk per one standard deviation of WtHR (95% CI 1.07–1.25), a risk estimate similar to that reported in the present study [10]. Importantly, not all of the causes of death examined in this study have been previously studied, thus additional studies are needed to confirm these results. Of note, the lack of association with Alzheimer’s disease mortality in men requires further investigation as no previous study has reported on this outcome. Additionally, while the lack of association with cancer mortality in men was also observed in the previous NHANES study [16], it could be due to the contribution of individual cancers to the whole (e.g., a large number of lung cancers would likely attenuate overall cancer associations).

WtHR was more strongly associated with risk among women under age 70 years. While there was no statistically significant difference by age among men, associations appeared to be stronger in men aged 70 years or older. These results are similar to a prior study of BMI and mortality risk in this same study population [18], where we found that BMI was most strongly associated with mortality before age 70 years. Disease- and age-related weight loss, which tends to be driven by loss of lean mass, may make BMI a poorer measure of excess mortality risk in older adults [19], whereas abdominal adiposity, even as overall weight decreases, is retained as adults age. Thus, WC and WtHR may be better predictors of disease risk in older adults. This is similarly seen in individuals who smoke cigarettes, because they tend to be leaner overall but retain visceral fat [20]. In the present study, associations with WtHR and mortality did not substantively change when restricting to lifelong nonsmokers, suggesting that smoking history is not confounding the association whereas in our previous study of BMI, associations were strongest among lifelong non-smokers [18] While it is unclear why WtHR may not be confounded by smoking history and studies are needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms, these findings suggest that different measures of adiposity may be more appropriate to use depending on underlying patient characteristics.

There are several strengths that should be noted. This was the largest study to date examining WtHR, and collection of multiple measures of adiposity allowed for direct comparison of these measures in the same population. Other strengths include the ability to account for various confounders and long-term follow-up. The study has notable limitations. Specifically, the main limitation is the reliance on a single self-reported measure of weight and height. However, when compared with measured weight and height, self-reported data tended to overestimate height in men and underestimate weight in women, but the magnitude of this error is likely small [21]. Additionally, waist circumference was self-measured by participants, but past studies have found that self-recorded waist circumference data are valid and reliable [22].

In conclusion, in the largest study to date to examine WtHR in relation to mortality, WtHR, WC, and BMI similarly predicted all-cause, cardiovascular disease, cancer, respiratory disease, and Alzheimer’s disease mortality. While excess adiposity has been established as a major risk factor for premature death, different measures of excess adiposity that can all be easily assessed in clinical settings may be more predictive in different populations defined by age or other factors. Additional studies are needed to understand differences by sex, age, race and ethnicity, as well as other factors such as smoking history.

Supporting information

S1 File. Supplementary Table 1.

Multivariable adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between body mass index (BMI) and mortality and waist circumference and mortality, women. Supplementary Table 2. Multivariable adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between body mass index (BMI) and mortality and waist circumference and mortality for men.

(DOCX)

pone.0328760.s001.docx (49.6KB, docx)

Acknowledgments

The authors express sincere appreciation to all Cancer Prevention Study-II participants, and to each member of the study and biospecimen management group.

Data Availability

Data cannot be shared publicly due to privacy requirements from our ethics board. Data are available upon request (email cohort.data@cancer.org to submit request to data access committee or access form on www.cancer.org) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Di Angelantonio E, Bhupathiraju SN, Wormser D, Gao P, Kaptoge S, Global BMI Mortality Collaboration. Body-mass index and all-cause mortality: individual-participant-data meta-analysis of 239 prospective studies in four continents. Lancet. 2016;388(10046):776–86. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30175-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lauby-Secretan B, Scoccianti C, Loomis D, Grosse Y, Bianchini F, Straif K. Body Fatness and Cancer--Viewpoint of the IARC Working Group. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(8):794–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1606602 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Powell-Wiley TM, Poirier P, Burke LE, Després JP, Gordon-Larsen P, Lavie CJ, et al. Obesity and cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2021;143(21):e984–1010. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000973 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jeong SM, Lee DH, Rezende LFM, Giovannucci EL. Different correlation of body mass index with body fatness and obesity-related biomarker according to age, sex and race-ethnicity. Scientific Reports. 2023;13(1):3472. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30527-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pray R, Riskin S. The history and faults of the body mass index and where to look next: a literature review. Cureus. 2023;15(11):e48230. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48230 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cerhan JR, Moore SC, Jacobs EJ, Kitahara CM, Rosenberg PS, Adami HO. A pooled analysis of waist circumference and mortality in 650,000 adults. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014;89(3):335–45. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.11.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ashwell M, Gunn P, Gibson S. Waist-to-height ratio is a better screening tool than waist circumference and BMI for adult cardiometabolic risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis. Obesity Reviews. 2012;13(3):275–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00952.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ashwell M, Mayhew L, Richardson J, Rickayzen B. Waist-to-Height Ratio Is More Predictive of Years of Life Lost than Body Mass Index. PLOS ONE. 2014;9(9):e103483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Butt JH, Petrie MC, Jhund PS, Sattar N, Desai AS, Køber L, et al. Anthropometric measures and adverse outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: revisiting the obesity paradox. European Heart Journal. 2023;44(13):1136–53. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad083 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Abdi Dezfouli R, Mohammadian Khonsari N, Hosseinpour A, Asadi S, Ejtahed HS, Qorbani M. Waist to height ratio as a simple tool for predicting mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Obes (Lond). 2023;47(12):1286–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Busetto L, Dicker D, Frühbeck G, Halford JCG, Sbraccia P, Yumuk V. A new framework for the diagnosis, staging and management of obesity in adults. Nature Medicine. 2024;30(9):2395–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Calle EE, Rodriguez C, Jacobs EJ, Almon ML, Chao A, McCullough ML, et al. The American Cancer Society Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort: Rationale, Study Design, and Baseline Characteristics. Cancer. 2002;94(9):2490–501. doi: 10.1002/cncr.101970 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Calle EE, Terrell DD. Utility of the National Death Index for Ascertainment of Mortality among Cancer Prevention Study II Participants. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1993;137(2):235–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.ICD-10: international statistical classification of diseases and related health problems: tenth revision. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rock CL, Thomson CA, Sullivan KR, Howe CL, Kushi LH, Caan BJ, et al. American Cancer Society Nutrition and Physical Activity Guideline for Cancer Survivors. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2022;72(3):230–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lo K, Huang YQ, Shen G, Huang JY, Liu L, Yu YL. Effects of waist to height ratio, waist circumference, body mass index on the risk of chronic diseases, all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality. Postgrad Med J. 2021;97(1147):306–11. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-137542 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chan V, Cao L, Wong MMH, Lo K, Tam W. Diagnostic accuracy of waist-to-height ratio, waist circumference, and body mass index in identifying metabolic syndrome and its components in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Dev Nutr. 2024;8(1):102061. doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2023.102061 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Patel AV, Hildebrand JS, Gapstur SM. Body mass index and all-cause mortality in a large prospective cohort of white and black U.S. adults. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e109153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Borkan GA, Hults DE, Gerzof SG, Robbins AH, Silbert CK. Age changes in body composition revealed by computed tomography. J Gerontol. 1983;38(6):673–7. doi: 10.1093/geronj/38.6.673 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kim JH, Shim KW, Yoon YS, Lee SY, Kim SS, Oh SW. Cigarette smoking increases abdominal and visceral obesity but not overall fatness: an observational study. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Stevens J, Keil JE, Waid LR, Gazes PC. Accuracy of current, 4-year, and 28-year self-reported body weight in an elderly population. Am J Epidemiol. 1990;132(6):1156–63. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115758 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kushi LH, Kaye SA, Folsom AR, Soler JT, Prineas RJ. Accuracy and reliability of self-measurement of body girths. Am J Epidemiol. 1988;128(4):740–8. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 File. Supplementary Table 1.

Multivariable adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between body mass index (BMI) and mortality and waist circumference and mortality, women. Supplementary Table 2. Multivariable adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between body mass index (BMI) and mortality and waist circumference and mortality for men.

(DOCX)

pone.0328760.s001.docx (49.6KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

Data cannot be shared publicly due to privacy requirements from our ethics board. Data are available upon request (email cohort.data@cancer.org to submit request to data access committee or access form on www.cancer.org) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.


Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES